Abstract
Dark septate endophytes (DSEs) can form reciprocal symbioses with most terrestrial plants, providing them with mineral nutrients in exchange for photosynthetic products. Although the mechanism of plant-DSEs is well understood at the transcriptional level, little is known about their post-transcriptional regulation, and microRNAs (miRNAs) for the symbiotic process of DSE infestation of raspberry have not been identified. In this study, we comprehensively identified the miRNAs of DSE-infested raspberry symbiosis using Illumina sequencing. A total of 361 known miRNAs and 95 novel miRNAs were identified in the roots. Similar to other dicotyledons, most of the identified raspberry miRNAs were 21 nt in length. Thirty-seven miRNAs were differentially expressed during colonization after inoculation with Phialocephala fortinii F5, suggesting a possible role for these miRNAs in the symbiotic process. Notably, two miRNAs (miR171h and miR396) previously reported to be responsive to symbiotic processes in alfalfa also had altered expression during raspberry symbiosis. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses suggests that miRNAs are mainly involved in regulatory mechanisms, such as biological processes, cellular metabolic processes, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, plant–pathogen interactions, and phytohormone signaling pathways. This study revealed the potential conservation of miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation in symbiotic processes among plants and provides some novel miRNAs for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of DSE–raspberry symbiosis.
Introduction
Dark septate endophytes (DSEs) are dominant endophytic fungal groups that colonize plant roots and are mainly characterized by dark-colored hyphae with distinct transverse septa that colonize the epidermis, cortex, or intercellular spaces of healthy plant roots, with few developing pathological features similar to pathogenic fungi within the root tissue (Hou et al., 2020). DSEs have similar functions to mycorrhizal fungi and enable reciprocal symbiosis with host plants (Fracchia et al., 2011; Monica et al., 2015). DSEs contribute to the mineralization of insoluble organic and inorganic phosphorus, promote the uptake and utilization of soil nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and enhance plant stress resistance (Yan et al., 2011; Khastini et al., 2012). DSEs have colonization advantages over arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) in extreme environments, such as alpine and polar regions, and gradually replace mycorrhizal fungi and perform diverse ecological functions (Jumpponen and Trappe, 1998; Mandyam and Jumpponen, 2005). However, the mechanism of the interaction between DSEs and host plants is not as clear as that of AMF. Therefore, further research is needed to improve plant growth and quality with DSEs.
Plant microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous non-coding small molecule RNAs of 18–25 nt in length that are involved in regulating the expression of various genes during plant growth, development, and metabolism (Kurihara and Watanabe, 2004). Recently, the discovery of small RNA sheds light on post-transcriptional gene regulation. High-throughput sequencing has been widely used to identify conserved and novel miRNAs in plants, which has enlarged the realm of miRNA research (Simsek et al., 2017; Jiu et al., 2019). Through small RNA sequencing technology, some known miRNAs and novel miRNAs in non-model plants, such as grass pea (Bhat et al., 2020), cardamom (Anjali et al., 2019), white lupin (Zhu et al., 2010), and Brazilian pine (Galdino et al., 2019), have been successfully identified or predicted. Studies have confirmed that miRNAs play vital roles in plant–microbe symbioses. miR171h has been found to regulate arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi colonization of medicinal plants by targeting NSP2. Studies have also proposed that miRNAs play a role in the arbuscular mycorrhizal signal transduction of tomato by analyzing miRNA expression patterns (Gu et al., 2010; Lauressergues et al., 2012). In addition, Chien et al. found that miRNA mycorrhizal signal transduction is related to nutrient transport, among which miR156 can affect the regulatory pathway of strigolactone in symbiosis formation, and miR171, miR398, miR399, and miR408 play a role in the regulation of phosphorus homeostasis (Chen et al., 2015; Chien et al., 2017; Hussain et al., 2018). Scholars have a preliminary understanding of the regulatory mechanism of miRNA involved in the formation and function of symbioses, but more studies are still at the basic stage of mining and identifying symbiosis-related miRNA and the change in expression level. Therefore, functional studies of miRNA in the symbiosis process still need to be carried out.
Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) is a shrub with special characteristics in cold regions (Kim et al., 2016). Raspberry leaves are rich in trace elements, gallic acid, salicylic acid, and many other active substances with health functions (Djordjević et al., 2015). Its fruits have been proven to have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-cancer, and antibacterial functions (Jung et al., 2015; Akkari et al., 2016). In recent years, raspberries are popular as emerging small berries, and the planting area is expanding (Carew et al., 2015; Lebedev et al., 2018). We previously examined miRNAs in raspberry root, stem and leaf tissues using high-throughput sequencing technology to further elucidate the role of miRNAs in raspberry growth and development (Yan et al., 2020). Similar to other plants, raspberries recruit fungi to their roots as they grow, thus facilitating the host’s uptake of water and minerals from the soil, which in turn promotes plant growth (Oszust and Frc, 2020).
At present, most studies on the molecular mechanisms of symbiotic miRNAs are based on herbaceous and woody model plants (Zhu et al., 2010; Anjali et al., 2019). The mechanism of action of symbiotic miRNAs in Rosaceae is still unclear, and a study of raspberry and symbiosis-related miRNAs has not been reported. The formation of symbiosis is a dynamic and complex regulatory process, and after mycelial invasion, plant cells undergo a complex reconstruction process, leading to a series of complex morphological and physiological changes. Based on the important regulatory role of miRNAs in plant growth and development, this study identified raspberry-DSE symbiosis-related miRNAs and target genes influencing plant performance traits by regulating the expression levels of related miRNAs in plants to screen miRNAs that positively regulate the symbiosis formation process and promote the effective colonization of raspberry roots by fungi and their proliferation.
Materials and methods
Dark septate endophytes and plant materials
Phialocephala fortinii F5 was stored at −4°C on potato dextrose agar (PDA, containing 200 g/l−1 potato extract, 20 g/l−1 glucose, and 20 g/l−1 agar, pH 7.0). The sequence of this strain’s rDNA internal transcribed space was submitted to the NCBI database under accession number KY910213.1. After 2 weeks of culture on PDA, the mycelia of F5 were collected using a sterile 5-mm diameter cork borer.
Raspberry seeds were sterilized in 75% alcohol solution for 30 s, washed three times with sterilized water, transferred to 2% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, and then washed 5 times with sterilized water. The micropropagated seedlings of raspberry were transferred to a WPM medium. The seedlings were grown in the culture room at 28°C. After 3 months, aseptic raspberry seedlings were planted in a soil matrix (80% turfy soil and 20% vermiculite) and grown in a controlled growth room (25°C, 16/8 h, day/night, 1,600 lux). Twenty seedlings were inoculated with an F5 mycelium pellet obtained by liquid culture, and the remaining 20 were grown without F5 treatment as a control. The samples were labeled CK (control check, without inoculation), BI (presymbiotic phase, 3 weeks after inoculation), and UI (symbiotic phase, 5 weeks after inoculation). Sample roots were collected and separated into two parts. One part was used to check the F5 colonization rate, and the other part was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for RNA extraction. To determine growth parameters, such as plant height, root length, fresh weight, and root activity (Peng et al., 2022), three biological replicates were performed to calculate the mean expression and standard deviation (SD).
Analyses of F5 colonization in roots
Raspberry roots were fixed with formalin–acetic acid–alcohol (FAA) for 12 h. The roots were then treated with 10% KOH and heated for 1 h, followed by treatment with 1% HCl for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, the roots were stained with Trypan Blue (Liu et al., 2016). Dyed roots were detected after transparency with lactic acid and glycerin.
Total RNA extraction, library construction, and small RNA sequencing
Total RNA was extracted from the collected root samples with TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA concentration and purity were measured by a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific), and total RNA integration and quality were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA molecules that were less than 50 nt in length were enriched and ligated with proprietary adapters. The RNA samples ligated with adapters were reverse transcribed and amplified by PCR to produce sequencing libraries. The three sRNA libraries from raspberry roots were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2,500 (Santiago, CA, United States) platform at Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2021) in National Genomics Data Center (Nucleic Acids Res 2022), China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA008006) that are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa.
Identification of known and novel miRNAs
High-quality reads were generated by removing the adaptor reads, low-quality sequences, and fragments of less than 18 nt or more than 30 nt from the raw reads. To classify the clean reads, they were aligned with the small RNAs and annotated to Rfam databases (Rfam 11.0, rfam. janelia.org) to identify and filter out the ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transport RNA (tRNA), nuclear small RNA (snRNA), nucleolar small RNA (snoRNA), and repeat sequences. After the removal of known miRNAs, the remaining sequences were used to identify novel miRNAs according to their hairpin structures predicted by Mireap_V0.2 software. Novel miRNAs were predicted from non-annotated sRNA sequences using miRDeep2 software (Friedländer et al., 2012). The basic criteria were used to screen for new candidate miRNAs (Zhang et al., 2015).
Identification of F5-responsive miRNAs in raspberry
To identify F5 symbiosis-responsive miRNAs, raw miRNA counts from each sample were used to normalize miRNA expression. The fold changes in miRNA levels in treated samples were calculated relative to those in the control. The miRNAs with a fold-change in expression log2 (treatment/control) ≥ 2 and an adjusted value of p < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed and referred to as the F5 fungus-responsive miRNAs. Tool DEseq (version 1) was used to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs.
Prediction of target genes
Based on the sequences of known and novel miRNAs, the putative target genes were predicted by the software psRNATarget algorithm with the following parameters: (1) maximum expectation is less than 5.0; (2) length for complementary scoring (hspsize) is shorter than 19; (3) range of central mismatch leading to translational inhibition is 10–11 nt. The mature sequences of all miRNAs were submitted to predict target genes; and (4) the minimum free energy (MFE) of the miRNA/target duplex should be greater than or equal to 74% of its miRNA bound to a perfect complement.
To elucidate the regulatory function and pathways involved in symbiosis, the predicted target genes were further annotated and enriched against GO using Blast2GO (version 2.8, accessed online)1 and against the KEGG pathway database using KAAS (KEGG Automatic Annotation Server, accessed online)2, respectively.
Stem-loop qRT-PCR identification
Stem-loop primers were designed for qRT-PCR, as described by Chen et al. (2005). The primers are shown in Supplementary Table S1. To verify the relative expression of the miRNAs in the CK, BI, and UI groups, a reverse transcriptase reaction was performed using a HiFiScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (CW2569M, CWBIO, Beijing, China). The 20 ml mixture contained 0.5 mM each of dNTPs, stem-loop primers, 5 mg RNA template, 10 mM DTT, 200 U HiFiScript, and RNase-free water. Then, reverse transcription products were mixed with TB Green Premix Ex Taq (Tli RNaseH Plus, TaKaRa, Dalian, China) in a 96-well plate to start the real-time PCR reaction with a Roche LightCycler 480 II system using the following conditions: an initial denaturation step of 30 s at 95°C, 40 cycles of denaturation for 5 s at 95°C, 30 s at 60°C for annealing, and 30 s extension at 72°C. The relative expression of miRNAs was calculated based on the abundance of the reference gene U6 snRNA. The 2–△△CT method was adopted to assess the relative miRNA expression from the qRT-PCR experiments (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Three biological replicates with three technical replicates were performed for each sample.
Results
Effects of F5 on the morphological and physiological of raspberry
To evaluate the plant growth of DSE F5 on the growth of raspberry, we used F5 to inoculate R. idaeus seedlings. After 3 months, F5 inoculation had a dramatically positive effect on the fresh weight, plant height, root length, and root activity of raspberry. The F5-colonized raspberry seedlings exhibited more vigorous growth than the controls (Figures 1A,B). In particular, the root length of the F5-treated raspberry seedlings had significant advantages over that of the control. After 3 months of growth, F5-inoculated seedlings had a 43% greater fresh weight and 56% greater plant height than the control seedlings. Similarly, the root length and root activity of the F5-treated raspberry seedlings were 1.5 times greater than those of the controls (Figure 1G).
Figure 1
Microscopic observation confirmed that the fungal hyphae of F5 colonized the raspberry roots. Darkly pigmented hyphae were observed within the epidermal and cortical cells of F5-inoculated root hairs using trypan blue staining (Figures 1D–F). The features were identical to those previously described for DSEs. In contrast, the root cells of uninoculated seedlings were cleaner and showed no signs of infestation (Figure 1C).
Overview of small RNAs from raspberry via high-throughput sequencing
This study aimed to identify miRNAs responsive to symbiosis between raspberry and DSEs. A total of nine sRNA libraries comprising three samples (CK: control check; BI: the period before infection; UI: the period under infection) were generated using the Illumina sequencing platform. Three biological replicates were performed per treatment. Sequencing results showed that there were 15,157,505, 13,487,132, and 10,542,855 raw reads for CK, BI, and UI, respectively, while the clean reads comprised over 73.20% of all reads in the appropriate sizes of 18–35 nt without low-quality or substandard reads (Table 1). By analyzing the lengths of clean read sequences in samples from different periods, the sRNA sequence lengths were found to be mainly distributed between 18 and 30 nt, and mainly concentrated in 21–24 nt, with the largest number of sRNAs at 21 nt. The sequence length decreased sharply in abundance after 25 nt (Figure 2). The distribution of sRNAs in this study was similar to that in other dicotyledons (Rajagopalan et al., 2006; Moxon et al., 2008). Different lengths of sRNAs have different biological functions. This difference in abundance suggests that the expression of miRNAs in samples at different stages can be significantly different.
Table 1
| Read data | CK | BI | UI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw reads | 15,157,505 | 13,487,132 | 10,542,855 |
| High-quality reads | 15,067,606 | 13,408,253 | 10,484,440 |
| 3′ adapter null | 98,171 | 54,666 | 258,887 |
| Insert null | 123,243 | 110,387 | 80,796 |
| 5′ adapter contaminants | 24,446 | 29,250 | 11,594 |
| PolyA | 375 | 321 | 162 |
| Clean reads | 13,300,281 | 10,090,123 | 31,99,676 |
Statistics of small RNA libraries analyzed by high-throughput sequencing.
Figure 2
Identification of known and novel miRNAs
After the sequencing data were filtered and quality-controlled, the clean reads were compared using the GenBank and Rfam databases to count those annotated to rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA. The proportion of rRNA was much higher than the proportion of other types, followed by tRNA and snRNA, and the lowest proportion was of snoRNA (Supplementary Table S2). The number of all annotated known and novel miRNAs distributed among the three comparisons of raspberry is shown in Figure 3. After removing small non-coding RNAs, such as rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA, the remaining valid sequences were compared with the mature sequences of plant miRNAs in the miRBase database.
Figure 3
A total of 361 known miRNAs were identified from three libraries. We describe the top 20 largest miRNA family reads among all miRNAs in Figure 4. Most miRNAs with high expression (> 100 in each group) were 21 nt in length. The hairpin structure of 50 miRNAs was successfully predicted using mireap_v0.2; the length of the miRNA hairpin ranged from 79 to 295 nt. The minimal folding free energy index (MFEI) of hairpin structures ranged from 0.51 to 1.18, and over 94% of the MFEIs of miRNAs were greater than 0.80. Detailed miRNA information is shown in Supplementary Table S3. These miRNA families were characterized by the presence of numerous miRNAs, as expected. Some miRNAs were only detected in a particular group, showing that certain miRNAs were group-specific (Supplementary Table S4). Most of these miRNA families were highly conserved in plants, such as miR159, miR166, and miR396. Among these, miR396 was the most conserved and existed in 46 plant species. This was followed by miR166 and miR159, which were present in 45 and 10 plant species, respectively. In general, the expression of known miRNAs in raspberry was not abundant; 85 known miRNAs were present in three comparisons at high abundance (> 100), and 276 known miRNAs were at low abundance (about 100). Most of these miRNAs have unknown functions in F5–raspberry symbiosis.
Figure 4
After removal of the known miRNAs and other noncoding RNAs, the remaining clean reads mapped to the raspberry transcriptome were used to predict novel miRNAs based on the secondary structure. Using Mireap_V0.2 software, 95 types of novel miRNAs were identified, and a list of novel miRNA sequences, hairpin MFEIs, precursor sequences, and structures are shown in Supplementary Table S5.
The expression levels of the novel miRNAs among the CK, BI, and UI libraries were compared (Figure 5). In CK, BI, and UI, 81, 85, and 59 novel miRNAs, respectively, were identified, showing that the number of novel miRNAs was much smaller than the number of known miRNAs. Based on Figure 5, we concluded that most of the novel miRNAs were equally expressed among the three libraries, while several of the differentially expressed novel miRNAs deserve further attention to discern their functions. For example, novel miRNAs, such as novel-m0090-5p, novel-m0091-3p, novel-m0094-3p, and novel-m0095-3p, were highly expressed only in the BI group; novel-m0072-5p, novel-m0073-5p, novel-m0076-5p, and novel-m0078-5p were highly expressed in the CK and BI groups but not in the UI group. Detailed information on the predicted novel miRNAs is listed in Supplementary Table S6.
Figure 5
Identification of putative F5-responsive miRNAs in raspberry
To identify the differentially expressed miRNAs related to F5 in raspberry, we detected miRNA expression levels in nine sRNA libraries (including three biological duplicates). The relative expression of miRNAs from different libraries was calculated using log2, with a fold change ≥ 2 and p-value < 0.05 as screening conditions. The results showed that 13, 22, and 21 miRNAs were differentially expressed in CK vs. BI (6 upregulated and 7 downregulated), BI vs. UI (15 upregulated and 7 downregulated), and CK vs. UI (16 upregulated and 5 downregulated), respectively (Supplementary Tables S7–S9).
Differential expression analysis revealed potential key regulatory miRNAs during F5 infestation in raspberry. A total of 25 known miRNAs were differentially expressed in the three comparisons. A total of 6 (4 upregulated and 2 downregulated) differentially expressed miRNAs were found in the CK vs. BI comparison group. In total, 15 and 16 known miRNAs were upregulated in the BI vs. UI and CK vs. UI comparison groups, respectively, of which 14 miRNAs were identical. The log2 of miR171-z, miR396, miR11532-z, miR11561-z, and miR1311-x exceeded 19.05, while miR156-y and miR7767-x were downregulated in both groups, indicating that the symbiosis-related miRNAs formed in vivo by F5 remained largely unchanged at the middle and late stages of raspberry infestation, acting together to promote symbiosis formation.
Additionally, we analyzed novel miRNA expression patterns. Fourteen novel miRNAs were differentially expressed, with a total of 7 (2 upregulated and 5 downregulated) differentially expressed miRNAs in CK vs. BI. A total of 4 miRNAs were downregulated in BI vs. UI, and 4 (1 upregulated and 3 downregulated) differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in CK vs. UI. Among them, novel-m0002-3p and novel-m0021-3p were downregulated in both the BI vs. UI and CK vs. UI comparison groups. Overall, the upregulated miRNAs were more abundant than the downregulated miRNAs in plants during the F5 infestation of raspberry. These results suggest that both known and novel miRNAs may play specific and important roles in the response of raspberry to DSE infestation.
Prediction and functional analysis of putative target genes of DSE-responsive miRNAs
miRNAs perform their functions by regulating the expression of their target genes or repressing their translation. Therefore, the prediction and identification of target genes is an important part of understanding the various biological functions of miRNAs. We performed target gene prediction using psRNATarget, and all miRNAs were predicted to have corresponding target genes. Among the identified miRNA-target pairs, target gene prediction was generally not a simple one-to-one relationship but rather a mismatched relationship. A single miRNA may regulate multiple target genes. In this article, 24,112 target genes were predicted for known miRNAs, while 1,367 target genes were obtained for novel miRNAs (Supplementary Tables S10, S11).
There was significant differential miRNA expression between CK, BI and UI (Figure 6). To further investigate the role of responsive symbiotic miRNAs in F5–raspberry symbiosis, we selected miRNAs differentially expressed in F5-infected raspberries for target gene prediction in the middle and late stages. A total of 561 target genes targeted by 37 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified. The annotations of some of the target genes responding to the co-expressed miRNAs are shown in Table 2. A large proportion of these target genes had specific or presumed functions, and these target genes were involved in the regulation of diverse metabolic processes.
Figure 6
Table 2
| miRNA | Description of target gene | References |
|---|---|---|
| miR11011-z | TMV resistance protein N-like, probable disease resistance protein At4g272ss20 | Guo et al. (2016), Dang et al. (2021) |
| miR11315-z | F-box protein CPR30-like | Gou et al. (2012) |
| miR11561-z | LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase At3g47570 | Sun et al. (2015) |
| miR396-y | GRF transcription factors; ceramidasegenes leaf and cotyledon development | Krebs et al. (2007) |
| miR1511-z | 40S ribosomal protein S26E, glutamate receptor 2.8-like, chitinase-like protein 1 | Tartar and Boucias (2004), Berek et al. (2009) |
| miR171-z | toll/interleukin-1 receptor-like protein, Scarecrow-like protein | Ding et al. (2012), Ru et al. (2015) |
| miR390-x | high affinity inorganic phosphate transporter, leucine-rich repeat receptor, Auxin response factor | Preuss et al. (2011), Yamaguchi et al. (2006) |
| miR403-y | DNA replication complex GINS protein SLD5 | Joshi et al. (2016) |
| miR5213-x | BURP domain-containing protein 5-like, calcium-dependent protein kinase 2-like | Boudsocq et al. (2012), Dinh and Kang (2017) |
| miR6300-z | RING finger protein ETP1-like, zinc finger BED domain-containing protein RICESLEEPER 2-like | Shen et al. (2014) |
| miR951-z | Growth-regulating factor | Kuijt et al. (2014) |
| miR8007-y | domain-containing protein, polyubiquitin 3 | Christensen et al. (1992) |
| miR156-y | 60S ribosomal protein L9, Auxin response factor | Yu et al. (2012) |
| miR7767-x | nodulation protein H, cell wall-associated hydrolase | Bloemberg et al. (2010), Liu et al. (2017) |
| miR827-z | cryptochrome1 | Keller et al. (2011) |
| novel-m0008-3p | sucrose synthase 2 | Zrenner et al. (2010) |
| novel-m0029-5p | senescence-associated protein, heme-binding protein | Kasaras et al. (2012), Shanmugabalaji et al. (2020) |
| novel-m0011-5p | metallothiol transferases FosB | Thompson et al. (2015) |
| novel-m0021-3p | DUF538 family protein | Takahashi et al. (2013) |
| novel-m0032-3p | protein-lysine methyltransferase | Sheng et al. (2016) |
Prediction of target genes in response to F5 symbiotic miRNA in raspberry.
To further analyze the possible regulatory pathways involved in miRNA target genes, GO and KEGG functional enrichment analyses were performed for all target genes in this study. GO enrichment analysis showed that many target genes were associated with biological process (GO:0008150), metabolic process (GO:0008152), cellular process (GO:0009987), organic substance metabolic process (GO:0071704), and cellular metabolic process (GO:0044237) in the biological process. For cellular components, the main terms were cell (GO:0005623), cell part (GO:0044464), and membrane (GO:0016020), and important terms for molecular functions were binding (GO:0005488), catalytic activity (GO:0003824), and transferase activity (GO:0016740; Figure 7).
Figure 7
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes functional enrichment showed that the pathways with the highest enrichment of target genes were Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (ko01110), Plant–pathogen interaction (ko04626), Glycerophospholipid metabolism (ko00564), Oxidative phosphorylation (ko00190), and Biosynthesis of amino acids (ko01230; Figure 8). Notably, five genes were annotated to the plant–pathogen interaction pathway, namely Unigene0062736 (CPK2), Unigene0014710 (MEKK1), Unigene0047782 (EFR), Unigene0017630 (CML38), and Unigene0020119 (At4g27190). All five genes are involved in plant immune responses, which play an important role in symbiosis formation between plants and rhizosphere microorganisms and are usually specifically repressed from rhizosphere microorganisms, thus promoting the invasion and proliferation of rhizosphere microorganisms (Cao et al., 2017). In this study, five genes were targeted by miR11011-z, miR2109-z, miR8007-y, and miR390-x. All four miRNAs were upregulated in symbiosis; therefore, it was hypothesized that miRNAs may affect F5–raspberry symbiosis by regulating plant immune responses.
Figure 8
Quantitative PCR expression analysis
Based on the identification of symbiotic miRNAs, quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR analysis was used to verify the expression patterns of five representative miRNAs. Although the expression levels of each miRNA differed between the high-throughput sequencing and qRT-PCR analyses, the overall trend was consistent, indicating that the relative expression level identified by the sequencing data was reliable and suitable for further analyses (Figure 9).
Figure 9
Discussion
Raspberry has high economic, nutritional, and medicinal value and is known as “the king of fruits” in the international market (Jagtap and Bapat, 2015). It is a “third-generation fruit” that is currently popular throughout the world. In recent years, the global raspberry planting area has increased, and the traditional root-tiller division, cutting propagation, and in vitro culture cannot meet the increasing demand due to slow propagation speed (Georgieva et al., 2016; Vadim et al., 2018). Data have shown that raspberry can form beneficial symbioses with various soil fungi, which can play an important role in promoting the absorption of nutrients and water and in improving environmental stress resistance (Correia et al., 2019; Hilje-Rodríguez and Molina-Bravo, 2020). Therefore, in this study, a dark septate endophyte (DSE) named F5, which was preserved in the laboratory, was selected to inoculate raspberry plants, and after 3 months of inoculation, it significantly improved plant growth.
Numerous studies have shown that DSEs have positive effects on host plants (Monica et al., 2015; Hou et al., 2020). However, it is controversial whether all species of DSES have a positive effect on plants. Newsham discussed 18 studies using meta-analysis to investigate the effect of DSE on plants. The results showed that DSE had a positive effect on plants, increasing total biomass as well as stem nitrogen and phosphorus content (Newsham, 2011). In contrast, another meta-analysis showed that inoculating plants with root fungal endophytes (including DSEs) had negative or neutral effects on plant biomass and nitrogen content (Mayerhofer et al., 2013). F5 in this experiment is the strain screened and isolated by ourselves, which can form a good symbiotic relationship with blueberry and raspberry, both of which can promote the growth of host plants and enhance the absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus in plants. To investigate the reasons for the increased growth of raspberry after F5 inoculation, we compared miRNAs from non-inoculated, 3-week inoculated, and 5-week inoculated raspberry plants by high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. We screened for symbiotic-regulated miRNAs and predicted their target genes to further reveal the molecular mechanism of F5–raspberry symbiosis.
Analysis of high-throughput sequencing results showed that the sRNA sequence lengths were mainly distributed in 21–24 nt, with the largest number of sRNAs at 21 nt. The distribution of sRNAs in this study was similar to that of other dicotyledons (Rajagopalan et al., 2006; Moxon et al., 2008). A total of 361 known miRNAs and 95 novel miRNAs were identified by bioinformatics analysis. It has been reported that the expression of known miRNAs in most plants is higher than that of novel miRNAs (Yang et al., 2013; Dan et al., 2018). Among them, the expression of most miRNAs was very low, indicating that sRNA sequencing technology is an effective strategy for the comprehensive identification of miRNAs in plants. Furthermore, we predicted the sequences, targets, and secondary structures of these miRNAs in different groups to determine their functions and interference mechanisms during F5–raspberry symbiosis.
In this study, approximately 34 highly conserved miRNA families (total reads > 100) were detected; miR159 had the most reads, followed by miR166 and miR396. Surprisingly, the highly expressed miRNAs in raspberry showed similar expression patterns to those in other plants (Baksa et al., 2015; Dan et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018). The results of this study were also consistent with the fact that miRNAs are highly conserved in plants. These highly expressed miRNAs may play an important regulatory role in plant growth, as well as in F5–raspberry symbiosis.
The regulation of MYB by miR159 plays an important role in plant growth, flowering induction, male reproduction, flower organ development, plant fertility, fruit development, and stress response. Currently, studies based on the miR159-MYB pathway have been conducted in-depth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Progress has also been made in rice, cucumber, grape, barley, strawberry, tobacco, and other plants (Allen et al., 2005; Alonso-Peral et al., 2010). Some studies have shown that miR166 can participate in the growth and development of plant roots by cutting the target mRNA of the HDZIP III gene (Gutierrez et al., 2009; Xue et al., 2017). Under drought stress, plants can effectively resist and adapt to drought stress by increasing root growth, changing root morphological structures, and reducing the damage to plants caused by drought stress (Peng et al., 2013). miR396 targets mRNA coding for growth-regulating factor (GRF) transcription factors, rhodenase-like protein, and kinesin-like protein B (Kong et al., 2022). Some members of the miR482 family can produce secondary siRNAs through targeted cleavage of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat-like (NBS-LRR-like) genes, thereby silencing and regulating a variety of genes related to plant disease resistance, including NBS-LRR-like genes (Sagi et al., 2017).
Although deep sequencing has been widely used to explore miRNAs, reports of symbiosis-associated miRNAs are still scarce. Symbiosis-related miRNAs have been studied mainly in the legume–rhizobia system, as well as in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi–plant interactions (Gu et al., 2010; Bazin et al., 2012). miRNAs, which do not encode proteins themselves, participate in physiological processes, such as organogenesis, growth and development, hormone secretion, signal transduction, and stress response of eukaryotes by regulating target genes with corresponding functions. Target gene prediction and identification are prerequisites for in-depth studies of the functions of miRNAs in various biological processes in plants. In this study, 37 miRNAs responding to F5–raspberry symbiosis were identified by testing three root samples. The target genes of miRNAs in all symbiotic processes were predicted using psRNATarget. Among the miRNAs whose expression was repressed, miR171-h was highly induced by symbiosis in raspberry roots. Currently, studies on miR171-h family members, such as miR171-h and miR171-z, have mainly focused on mycorrhizal symbiosis. Lauressergues et al., 2012 analyzed the interaction between miR171-h and its target genes. When mycorrhizal fungi colonized the plant, miR171-h expression was upregulated in the root extension region. Mycorrhizal colonization was significantly reduced after miR171-h overexpression, while it was significantly increased by the expression of mutant target genes resistant to miR171-h shearing. It has been hypothesized that mycorrhizal factors (Myc-LCOs) induce mycorrhizal invasion, and the plant negatively regulates the target genes through miRNA to prevent excessive fungal colonization. In this study, miR171-z was also found to target the NSP2 gene in raspberry by target gene prediction. This indicates that the miR171 family is highly conserved across species by regulating NSP2 genes to suppress fungal–plant symbiosis.
miR396 has been reported to regulate root division and mycorrhizal colonization in M. truncatula. Overexpression of the miR396b precursor caused downregulation of six growth regulator factors (Mt-GRF) and two transcription factor bHLH79-like genes, as well as a decrease in mycorrhizal number and root growth, whereas miR36 inhibition increased the mycorrhizal number and root mass (Bazin et al., 2013). The study also found that miR396 was highly induced by symbiosis in raspberry, implying that miR396 regulates fungi–plant symbiosis by targeting GRFs that are highly conserved across species. These results demonstrate the conserved nature of symbiosis regulation in plants and further prove the reliability of the data in the present study. The target genes of miR156 regulate auxin biosynthesis and are involved in the regulation of cell division, organ growth, lateral root and adventitious root development, and signal transduction (Ellis et al., 2005; Nguyen et al., 2015). The target genes of miR827 were OsSPX-MFS1 and OsSPX-MFS2, which encode SPX-MFS proteins predicted to be implicated in phosphate sensing or transport (Lin et al., 2010).
The identification of fungal–plant symbiotic miRNAs and target gene prediction have been conducted in soybean (Subramanian et al., 2008), alfalfa (Fan et al., 2014), and tomato (Gu et al., 2010), which was important for understanding the regulatory mechanism of F5–raspberry symbiosis from GO and KEGG functional pathway enrichment results. The analysis of raspberry root miRNAs and their target genes under symbiotic conditions revealed that the expression of conserved miR399 and miR398 was increased, while miR396, miR827, miR171, and other conserved miRNAs were repressed by symbiosis. Further functional prediction analysis of miRNA-mediated target genes revealed that most of these target genes are transcription factors or functional proteins involved in the regulation of basic metabolism and abiotic stress for plant growth and development. In addition, GO and KEGG enrichment showed that they are mainly involved in biological processes, cellular metabolic processes, and regulatory mechanisms, including secondary metabolite biosynthesis, plant–pathogen interactions, and phytohormone signaling pathways. These findings provide valuable information for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of F5–raspberry symbiosis involving miRNAs.
In conclusion, 361 known miRNAs and 95 novel miRNAs were identified in this systematic analysis of the F5–raspberry root system. Thirty-seven miRNAs responding to F5–raspberry symbiosis were identified, and the functions of these miRNAs or target genes need to be further validated. This study not only demonstrated that miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of F5–raspberry symbiosis is conserved in plants but also provided candidate miRNAs for studying the molecular mechanism of F5–raspberry symbiosis.
Funding
The work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2572021AW18), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971694 and 32071806), and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2020C101).
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
ZY, HZ, and JJ performed the experiments and analyzed the data. ZY, HZ, and LY detected the expression of miRNAs. ZY, HY, and LL wrote the manuscript. HY and LL designed the experiments and provided lab space and funding for this work. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1082494/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AkkariH.HajajiS.B'chirF.RekikM.GharbiM. (2016). Correlation of polyphenolic content with radical-scavenging capacity and anthelmintic effects of Rubus ulmifolius (Rosaceae) against Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol.221, 46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.007
2
AllenE.XieZ.GustafsonA. M.CarringtonJ. C. (2005). microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cells121, 207–221. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004
3
Alonso-PeralM. M.LiJ.LiY.AllenR. S.SchnippenkoetterW.OhmsS.et al. (2010). The microRNA159-regulated GAMYB-like genes inhibit growth and promote programmed cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.154, 757–771. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160630
4
AnjaliN.NadiyaF.ThomasJ.SabuK. K. (2019). Identification and characterization of drought responsive microRNAs and their target genes in cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton). Plant Growth Regul.87, 201–216. doi: 10.1007/s10725-018-0462-9
5
BaksaI.NagyT.BartaE.HaveldaZ.VárallyayÉ.SilhavyD.et al. (2015). Identification of Nicotiana benthamiana microRNAs and their targets using high throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. BMC Genom.16:1025. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2209-6
6
BazinJ.Bustos-SanmamedP.HartmannC.Lelandais-BrièreC.CrespiM. (2012). Complexity of miRNA-dependent regulation in root symbiosis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.367, 1570–1579. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0228
7
BazinJ.KhanG. A.CombierJ. P.Bustos-SanmamedP.DebernardiJ. M.RodriguezR.et al. (2013). miR396 affects mycorrhization and root meristem activity in the legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J.74, 920–934. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12178
8
BerekI.BeckerA.SchröderH.HärtlA.HölltV.GreckschG. (2009). Ampullosporin A, a peptaibol from Sepedonium ampullosporum HKI-0053 with neuroleptic-like activity. Behav. Brain Res.203, 232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.05.012
9
BhatK. V.MondalT. K.GaikwadA. B.KoleP. R.MohapatraT. (2020). Genome-wide identification of drought-responsive mirnas in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Plant Gene21, 100210–100212. doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2019.100210
10
BloembergG. V.Thomas-OatesJ. E.LugtenbergB.SpainkH. P. (2010). Nodulation protein NodL of Rhizobium leguminosarum O-acetylates lipo-oligosaccharides, chitin fragments and N-acetylglucosamine in vitro. Mol. Microbiol.11, 793–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00357.x
11
BoudsocqM.DroillardM.-J.RegadL.LaurièreC. (2012). Characterization of Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinases: activated or not by calcium?Biochem. J.447, 291–299. doi: 10.1042/BJ20112072
12
CaoY.HalaneM. K.GassmannW.StaceyG. (2017). The role of plant innate immunity in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.68, 535–561. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041030
13
CarewJ. G.GillespieT.WhiteJ.WainwrightH.BrennanR.BatteyN. H. (2015). The control of the annual growth cycle in raspberry. J. Horticult. Sci. Biotechnol.75, 495–503. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2000.11511275
14
ChenZ.GaoX.ZhangJ. (2015). Alteration of Osa-miR156e expression affects rice plant architecture and strigolactones (SLs) pathway. Plant Cell Rep.34, 767–781. doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1740-x
15
ChenC.RidzonD. A.BroomerA. J.ZhouZ.LeeD. H.NguyenJ. T.et al. (2005). Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res.33:e179. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni178
16
ChienP. S.ChiangC. B.WangZ.ChiouT. J. (2017). MicroRNA-mediated signaling and regulation of nutrient transport and utilization. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.39, 73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.007
17
ChristensenA. H.SharrockR. A.QuailP. H. (1992). Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Mol. Biol.18, 675–689. doi: 10.1007/BF00020010
18
CorreiaM.HelenoR.Da-SilvaL.-P.CostaJ.-M.Rodríguez-EcheverríaS. (2019). First evidence for the joint dispersal of mycorrhizal fungi and plant diaspores by birds. New Phytol.222, 1054–1060. doi: 10.1111/nph.15571
19
DanM.HuangM.LiaoF.QinR.LiangX.ZhangE.et al. (2018). Identification of ethylene responsive miRNAs and their targets from newly harvested banana fruits using high-throughput sequencing. J. Agric. Food Chem.66, 10628–10639. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01844
20
DangP. M.LambM. C.ChenC. Y. (2021). Association of differentially expressed R-gene candidates with leaf spot resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Mol. Biol. Rep.48, 323–334. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-06049-3
21
DingY.NdamukongI.XuZ.LapkoH.FrommM.AvramovaZ. (2012). ATX1-generated H3K4me3 is required for efficient elongation of transcription, not initiation, at ATX1-regulated genes. PLoS Genet.8:e1003111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003111
22
DinhS.-N.KangH. (2017). An endoplasmic reticulum-localized Coffea arabica BURP domain-containing protein affects the response of transgenic Arabidopsis plants to diverse abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep.36, 1829–1839. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2197-x
23
DjordjevićR.GibsonB.SandellM.De BillerbeckG. M.BugarskiB.Leskosek CukalovicI.et al. (2015). Raspberry wine fermentation with suspended and immobilized yeast cells of two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast32, 271–279. doi: 10.1002/yea.3060
24
EllisC. M.NagpalP.YoungJ. C.HagenG.GuilfoyleT. J.ReedJ. W. (2005). Auxin response factor1 and auxin response factor2 regulate senescence and floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development132, 4563–4574. doi: 10.1242/dev.02012
25
FanW.ShiP.WangC. (2014). Deep sequencing of the microRNA expression in fall dormant and non-dormant alfalfa. Genom. Data.2, 305–307. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2014.09.007
26
FracchiaS.KrapovickasL.Aranda-RickertA.ValentinuzziV. S. (2011). Dispersal of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes by ctenomys cf. knighti (rodentia) in the northern Monte desert of Argentina. J. Arid Environ.75, 1016–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.04.034
27
FriedländerM. R.MackowiakS. D.LiN.ChenW.RajewskyN. (2012). miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res.40, 37–52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr688
28
GaldinoJ. H.EguiluzM.GuzmanF.MargisR. (2019). Novel and conserved miRNAs among Brazilian pine and other gymnosperms. Front. Genet.10:222. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00222
29
GeorgievaL.TsvetkovI.GeorgievaM.KondakovaV. (2016). New protocol for in vitro propagation of berry plants by tis bioreactor. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci.22, 745–751.
30
GouM.ShiZ.ZhuY.BaoZ.WangG.HuaJ. (2012). The F-box protein CPR1/CPR30 negatively regulates R protein SNC1 accumulation. Plant J.69, 411–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04799.x
31
GuM.XuK.ChenA.ZhuY.TangG.XuG. (2010). Expression analysis suggests potential roles of microRNAs for phosphate and arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling in Solanum lycopersicum. Physiol. Plant.138, 226–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01320.x
32
GuoD. L.XiF. F.YuY. H.ZhangX. Y.ZhangG. H.ZhongG. Y. (2016). Comparative RNA-Seq profiling of berry development between table grape 'Kyoho' and its early-ripening mutant 'Fengzao'. BMC Genom.17:795. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3051-1
33
GutierrezL.BussellJ. D.PacurarD. I.SchwambachJ.PacurarM.BelliniC. (2009). Phenotypic plasticity of adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis is controlled by complex regulation of Auxin Response Factor transcripts and microRNA abundance. Plant Cell21, 3119–3132. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064758
34
Hilje-RodríguezI.Molina-BravoR. (2020). Inoculation and co-inoculation of two monosporic fungi onto surface-sterile blackberry fruits for quantification experiments. MethodsX.7:101092. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101092
35
HouL.YuJ.ZhaoL.HeX. (2020). Dark septate endophytes improve the growth and the tolerance of Medicago sativa and Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under cadmium stress. Front. Microbiol.10:3061. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03061
36
HussainS. S.HussainM.IrfanM.SiddiqueK. (2018). “Legume, microbiome, and regulatory functions of miRNAs in systematic regulation of symbiosis” in Plant Microbiome: Stress Response. eds. EgamberdievaD.AhmadP. (Singapore: Springer), 255–282.
37
JagtapU. B.BapatV. A. (2015). Wines from fruits other than grapes: current status and future prospectus. Food Biosci.9, 80–96. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2014.12.002
38
JiuS.LengX.HaiderM. S.DongT.GuanL.XieZ.et al. (2019). Identification of copper (cu) stress-responsive grapevine microRNAs and their target genes by high-throughput sequencing. R. Soc. Open Sci.6:180735. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180735
39
JoshiK.ShahV. J.MaddikaS. (2016). GINS complex protein Sld5 recruits SIK1 to activate MCM helicase during DNA replication. Cell. Signal.28, 1852–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.08.018
40
JumpponenA.TrappeJ. M. (1998). Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol.140, 295–310. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00265.x
41
JungH.LeeH. J.ChoH.LeeK.KwakH.HwangK. T. (2015). Anthocyanins in Rubus fruits and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in RAW 264.7 cells. Food Sci. Biotechnol.24, 1879–1886. doi: 10.1007/s10068-015-0246-1
42
KasarasA.MelzerM.KunzeR. (2012). Arabidopsis senescence-associated protein DMP1 is involved in membrane remodeling of the ER and tonoplast. BMC Plant Biol.12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-54
43
KellerM. M.JaillaisY.PedmaleU. V.MorenoJ. E.ChoryJ.BallaréC. L. (2011). Cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B control shade-avoidance responses in Arabidopsis via partially independent hormonal cascades. Plant J.67, 195–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04598.x
44
KhastiniR. O.OhtaH.NarisawaK. (2012). The role of a dark septate endophytic fungus, Veronaeopsis simplex Y34, in Fusarium disease suppression in Chinese cabbage. J. Microbiol.50, 618–624. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-2105-6
45
KimM. J.SuttonK. L.HarrisG. K. (2016). Raspberries and related fruits. Encyclopedia Food Health, 586–591. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00586-9
46
KongL.ZhuoY.XuJ.MengX.WangY.ZhaoW.et al. (2022). Identification of long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs involved in anther development in the tropical Camellia oleifera. BMC Genom.23:596. doi: 10.1186/s128ss64-022-08836-7
47
KrebsS.MedugoracI.RötherS.SträsserK.FörsterM. (2007). A missense mutation in the 3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase FVT1 as candidate causal mutation for bovine spinal muscular atrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104, 6746–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607721104
48
KuijtS. J.GrecoR.AgalouA.ShaoJ.HoenC. C.OvernäsE.et al. (2014). Interaction between the growth-regulating factor and knotted1-like homeobox families of transcription factors. Plant Physiol.164, 1952–1966. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222836
49
KuriharaY.WatanabeY. (2004). Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 12753–12758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403115101
50
LauresserguesD.DelauxP. M.FormeyD.Lelandais-BrièreC.FortS.CottazS.et al. (2012). The microRNA miR171h modulates arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Medicago truncatula by targeting NSP2. Plant J.72, 512–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05099.x
51
LebedevV.ArkaevM.DremovaM.PozdniakovI.ShestibratovK. (2018). Effects of growth regulators and gelling agents on ex vitro rooting of raspberry. Plants (Basel)8:3. doi: 10.3390/plants8010003
52
LinS. I.SantiC.JobetE.LacutE.El-KholtiN.KarlowskiW. M.et al. (2010). Complex regulation of two target genes encoding SPX-MFS proteins by rice miR827 in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 2119–2131. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq170
53
LiuQ.XingW.QinJ.ChengS.Won-SikY.LeiH.et al. (2017). The ATP-dependent protease ClpP inhibits biofilm formation by regulating Agr and cell wall hydrolase Sle1 in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.7:181. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00181
54
LiuF.XuY. J.JiangH. H.JiangC. S.DuY. B.GongC.et al. (2016). Systematic identification, evolution and expression analysis of the Zea mays PHT1 gene family reveals several new members involved in root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Int. J. Mol. Sci.17:930. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060930
55
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods25, 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
56
MandyamK.JumpponenA. (2005). Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi. Stud. Mycol.53, 173–189. doi: 10.3114/sim.53.1.173
57
MayerhoferM. S.KernaghanG.HarperK. A. (2013). The effects of fungal root endophytes on plant growth: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza23, 119–128. doi: 10.1007/s00572-012-0456-9
58
MonicaI.SaparratM.GodeasA. M.ScervinoJ. M. (2015). The co-existence between DSE and AMF symbionts affects plant p pools through p mineralization and solubilization processes. Fungal Ecol.17, 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.04.004
59
MoxonS.JingR.SzittyaG.SchwachF.Rusholme-PilcherR. L.MoultonV.et al. (2008). Deep sequencing of tomato short RNAs identifies microRNAs targeting genes involved in fruit ripening. Genome Res.18, 1602–1609. doi: 10.1101/gr.080127.108
60
NewshamK. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. New Phytol.190, 783–793. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x
61
NguyenG. N.RothsteinS. J.SpangenbergG.KantS. (2015). Role of microRNAs involved in plant response to nitrogen and phosphorous limiting conditions. Front. Plant Sci.6:629. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00629
62
OszustK.FrcM. (2020). First report on the microbial communities of the wild and planted raspberry rhizosphere–a statement on the taxa, processes and a new indicator of functional diversity. Ecol. Indic.121:107117. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107117
63
PengS.DanL.ZhangZ. J.YinW. L.XiaX. L. (2013). Identification of drought-responsive and novel Populus trichocarpa microRNAs by high-throughput sequencing and their targets using degradome analysis. BMC Genom.14:233. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-233
64
PengX.LiJ.SunL.GaoY.CaoM.LuoJ. (2022). Impacts of water deficit and post-drought irrigation on transpiration rate, root activity, and biomass yield of Festuca arundinacea during phytoextraction. Chemosphere294:133842. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133842
65
PreussC. P.HuangC. Y.TyermanS. D. (2011). Proton-coupled high-affinity phosphate transport revealed from heterologous characterization in Xenopus of barley-root plasma membrane transporter, HvPHT1;1. Plant Cell Environ.34, 681–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02272.x
66
RajagopalanR.VaucheretH.TrejoJ.BartelD. P. (2006). A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev.20, 3407–3425. doi: 10.1101/gad.1476406
67
RuK.FengS.ZhengY.ZhangY.YanL.GuoZ.et al. (2015). Inducible expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein by interleukin-1α, interleukin-1β and toll-like receptor 2 promoters in goat mammary epithelial cells in response to bacterial challenges. Vet. J.203, 85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.029
68
SagiM. S.DeokarA. A.Tar'anB. (2017). Genetic analysis of NBS-LRR gene family in chickpea and their expression profiles in response to Ascochyta blight infection. Front. Plant Sci.8:838. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00838
69
ShanmugabalajiV.GrimmB.KesslerF. (2020). Characterization of a plastoglobule-localized SOUL4 Heme-binding protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci.11:2. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00002
70
ShenL.ThongZ.GongX.ShenQ.GanY.YuH. (2014). The putative PRC1 RING-finger protein AtRING1A regulates flowering through repressing mads affecting flowering genes in Arabidopsis. Development141, 1303–1312. doi: 10.1242/dev.104513
71
ShengM.Martin-LaffonJ.MininnoM.GigarelO.BrugièreS.BastienO.et al. (2016). Molecular evolution of the substrate specificity of chloroplastic aldolases/rubisco lysine methyltransferases in plants. Mol. Plant9, 569–581. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.003
72
SimsekO.DonmezD.KacarY. A. (2017). RNA-Seq analysis in fruit science: a review. Am. J. Plant Biol.2:1. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.s.2017020501.11
73
SubramanianS.FuY.SunkarR.BarbazukW. B.ZhuJ. K.YuO. (2008). Novel and nodulation-regulated microRNAs in soybean roots. BMC Genom.9:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-160
74
SunT. J.LuY.NarusakaM.ShiC.YangY. B.WuJ. X.et al. (2015). A novel pyrimidin-like plant activator stimulates plant disease resistance and promotes growth. PLoS One10:e0123227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123227
75
TakahashiS.YoshikawaM.KamadaA.OhtsukiT.UchidaA.NakayamaK.et al. (2013). The photoconvertible water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein of Chenopodium album is a member of DUF538, a superfamily that distributes in Embryophyta. J. Plant Physiol.170, 1549–1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.06.001
76
TartarA.BouciasD. G. (2004). A pilot-scale expressed sequence tag analysis of Beauveria bassiana gene expression reveals a tripeptidyl peptidase that is differentially expressed in vivo. Mycopathologia158, 201–209. doi: 10.1023/b:myco.0000041905.17948.42
77
ThompsonM. K.KeithlyM. E.SulikowskiG. A.ArmstrongR. N. (2015). Diversity in fosfomycin resistance proteins. Perspect. Sci.4, 17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.pisc.2014.12.004
78
VadimG.MarcelV. R.Magda-ViolaH.MonikaH.ErikS.HenrykF. (2018). Evaluation of Rubus genetic resources on their resistance to cane disease. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.65, 1979–1993. doi: 10.1007/s10722-018-0670-1
79
XueT.DaiX.WangR.WangJ.LiuZ.XiangF. (2017). ARGONAUTE10 inhibits in vitro shoot regeneration via repression of miR165/166 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol.58, 1789–1800. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx117
80
YamaguchiY.PearceG.RyanC. A. (2006). The cell surface leucine-rich repeat receptor for AtPep1, an endogenous peptide elicitor in Arabidopsis, is functional in transgenic tobacco cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 10104–10109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603729103
81
YanZ.TaoL.LiL.ZhaoZ. W. (2011). The colonization of plants by dark septate endophytes (dse) in the valley-type savanna of Yunnan, Southwest China. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.5, 5340–5347. doi: 10.5897/AJMR10.389
82
YanG.ZhangJ.JiangM.GaoX.YangH.LiL. (2020). Identification of known and novel microRNAs in raspberry organs through high-throughput sequencing. Front. Plant Sci.11:728. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00728
83
YangJ.LiuX.XuB.ZhaoN.YangX.ZhangM. (2013). Identification of miRNAs and their targets using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis in cytoplasmic male-sterile and its maintainer fertile lines of Brassica juncea. BMC Genom.14:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-9
84
YuS.GalvãoV. C.ZhangY. C.HorrerD.ZhangT. Q.HaoY. H.et al. (2012). Gibberellin regulates the Arabidopsis floral transition through miR156-targeted SQUAMOSA promoter binding-like transcription factors. Plant Cell24, 3320–3332. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.101014
85
ZhangZ.JiangL.WangJ.GuP.ChenM. (2015). MTide: an integrated tool for the identification of miRNA-target interaction in plants. Bioinformatics31, 290–291. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu633
86
ZhouL.QuanS.XuH.MaL.NiuJ. (2018). Identification and expression of miRNAs related to female flower induction in walnut (Juglans regia L.). Molecules23:1202. doi: 10.3390/molecules23051202
87
ZhuY. Y.ZengH. Q.DongC. X.YinX. M.ShenQ. R.YangZ. M. (2010). MicroRNA expression profiles associated with phosphorus deficiency in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Sci.178, 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.09.011
88
ZrennerR.SalanoubatM.WillmitzerL.SonnewaldU. (2010). Evidence of the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J.7, 97–107. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.07010097.x
Summary
Keywords
dark septate endophytes, miRNA, symbiosis, raspberry, post-transcriptional regulation
Citation
Yang Z, Yuan L, Zhu H, Jiang J, Yang H and Li L (2022) Small RNA profiling reveals the involvement of microRNA-mediated gene regulation in response to symbiosis in raspberry. Front. Microbiol. 13:1082494. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1082494
Received
28 October 2022
Accepted
30 November 2022
Published
21 December 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Jingping Ge, Heilongjiang University, China
Reviewed by
Yinshan Guo, Shenyang Agricultural University, China; Yanfang Yang, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Yang, Yuan, Zhu, Jiang, Yang and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hongyi Yang, 18830701@nefu.edu.cnLili Li, lilili0622@126.com
This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.