Abstract
Introduction:
Bamboo is the largest member of the family Poaceae, and these fast-growing plants have many beneficial ecological effects. Both mutualistic and pathogenic fungi associate with bamboo, however, only a limited number of such fungal species have been identified, and information concerning the diversity of fungi that parasitizes bamboo leaves is sparse.
Methods:
Fungi were isolated from diseased leaves of bamboo from Fujian Province, China. Nucleotide sequences of four genetic loci were used for taxonomic and phylogenetic reconstruction. In addition, the morphological characteristics of fungal structures as well as growth parameters were characterized.
Results:
We report two new fungal species, one each within the Didymosphaeriaceae and Magnaporthaceae, both diverse genera that include saprophytes, endophytes, and pathogens. Based on combined morphological and phylogenetic analyses, including the nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the 28S large subunit of ribosomal RNA (LSU), the 18S small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (SSU), the large subunit of RNA polymerase I (rpb1), and the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (tef1-α), the two new species described herein have been named as Bifusisporella magnum sp. nov., and Letendraea bambusae sp. nov. Detailed descriptions and morphological features of the species are provided.
Discussion:
These data identify and describe new species within the Didymosphaeriaceae and Magnaporthaceae, expanding the diversity and distribution of fungi associating with bamboo.
1 Introduction
Bamboo (Bambusoideae, Poales) is one of the most important forms of wood in the world (Wysocki et al., 2015), with rich species diversity. It is found in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions on several continents, albeit rare in Europe (Phookamsak et al., 2022). Global bamboo resources are abundant, with a total of 140 genera and over 1,750 species. In China, there are ~770 species of bamboo, along with five hybrids and 203 forms or varieties, spread across 42 genera (Yang et al., 2024). China boasts the richest bamboo resources, the highest diversity, and the largest total cultivation area, accounting for more than 50% of the world's bamboo species (Liu et al., 2018; Dlamini et al., 2022). Bamboo species are widely distributed from cold mountain regions to hot tropical regions, form beneficial associations with a variety of fungi, but can also be vulnerable to fungal infection. Plant-associated fungi can be endophytic, living within plant tissues, exist on the surface of the plant as epiphytes, function as saprobes, and/or form parasitic interactions, leading to plant disease (Mu et al., 2024). Currently, more than 1,100 species of fungi associated with bamboo have been documented or described globally (Dai et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2022). Intriguingly, several “bambusicolous” fungi have been used in Chinese medicine to treat various human diseases and are known to produce a variety of bioactive functional metabolites (Yan et al., 2023).
Studies of bambusicolous fungi have been carried out since the 18th century, the earliest of which was initiated by Léveillé (1845), and aspects of their molecular phylogeny developed by Tanaka et al. (2009), who established a new family, Tetraplosphaeriaceae, and assigned it within the order Pleosporales. A second, diverse family of bamboo associating fungi, Didymosphaeriaceae, also within Pleosporales, has further been defined (Ariyawansa et al., 2014b; Dai et al., 2016). Species within these families are widely distributed globally, can grow on and/or parasitize a variety of hosts, including plants and occasionally other fungi and animals including human. These families encompass endophytes, epiphytes, saprophytes, and pathogens typically found on woody branches, herb stems, leaves, pods, and soil (Ren et al., 2022).
Munk (1953) introduced Didymosphaeriaceae in the order Melanommatales, with the type genus Didymosphaeria Fuckel (Barr, 1990). The sexual morph of these fungi is characterized by one-septal ascospores and trabeculate pseudoparaphyses which anastomose mostly above the asci (Ariyawansa et al., 2014a). The asexual morphs of Didymosphaeriaceae are diverse (Wijayawardene et al., 2022). Members of the genus of Montagnulaceae display one to multi-septate ascospores and generally cellular pseudoparaphyses. However, Ariyawansa et al. (2014a) compared the new species Didymosphaeria rubi-ulmifolii with the type species, D. futilis (Berk. & Broome) Rehm, based on multilocus phylogenetic analyses, demonstrating that D. rubi-ulmifolii clustered as a separate genus in Montagnulaceae, indicating that Montagnulaceae and Didymosphaeriaceae are synonymous (Ariyawansa et al., 2014b). Letendraea belongs to the Didymosphaeriaceae of the Pleosporales. Some species in the genus Letendraea, such as Letendraea sp. WZ07, are considered endophytic fungi that can colonize healthy plant tissues without causing obvious disease symptoms, and these fungi have been shown to produce secondary metabolites with anti-inflammatory activity (Qiao et al., 2022; Yan et al., 2024).
The order Magnaporthales, belongs to the class Sordariomycetes within the phylum Ascomycota. Wijayawardene et al. (2022) proposed five families and 39 genera within this order. Magnaporthaceae is the most diverse family within the Magnaporthales (Feng et al., 2024). Cannon (1994) proposed the Magnaporthaceae family to accommodate Magnaporthe and its related genus Buergenerula. As early as 2009, Magnaporthaceae was independently classified as a new order, Magnaporthales, based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of LSU and SSU genes (Thongkantha et al., 2009). Asexual forms appear as simple, unbranched or branched conidia, conidia straight or curved, transparent to light brown, septate, conidiogenous cells have pigment (Klaubauf et al., 2014). Members of the Magnaporthaceae include important plant pathogens of rice, grasses, and cereals. During an investigation of endophytic fungi in Brazilian Sorghum bicolor leaves, two isolates were discovered that exhibited morphological and phylogenetic differences from previously known members within the Magnaporthaceae. Consequently, Silva et al. (2019) established a new genus, Bifusisporella to accommodate these isolates.
In this study, we report on the identification and characterization of two species isolated from diseased bamboo plants, namely: Bifusisporella magnum sp. nov. (Magnaporthaceae) and Letendraea bambusae sp. nov. (Didymosphaeriaceae), based on phylogenetic (molecular) and morphological analyses. Phylogenetic reconstruction involved a multi-locus approach, combining data from five genetic loci: the intervening 5.8S nrRNA gene (ITS), the 28S large subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (LSU), the 18S small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (SSU), the large subunit of RNA polymerase I (rpb1), and the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (tef1-α) nucleotide sequences. These results expand the diversity of fungi infecting bamboo plants and provide distinguishing characteristics of bambusicolous fungi to better elucidate relationships between species.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Sampling and isolation
Fungal specimens isolated from diseased leaves of bamboo were collected in Fujian Province, China. Diseased leaves with obvious fungal necrosis and/or typical blight-spot symptoms were cut into ~25 mm2 pieces. The fragments were soaked in 75% ethanol solution for 60 s, washed once, then soaked in sterile deionized water for 20 s, then transferred to 5% sodium hypochlorite for 30–40 s, and then washed in sterile deionized water for three times for 45–60 s. The washed fragments were placed on sterilized filter paper to dry, then transferred to PDA plates and incubated at 25°C for 7 days (Su et al., 2021). Fungal hyphae on the growing edges of colonies were transferred to a new PDA plate until pure fungal cultures were obtained. Spore production and visual appearance of the colonies were examined on SNA plates amended with sterilized pine needles or bamboo leaf fragments, and plates were incubated at 25°C under a regimen of 12 h of near-ultraviolet light and 12 h of darkness (Zhang et al., 2023).
2.2 Morphological observation
After 7–14 days of incubation, fungal colonies were photographed with a digital camera (Canon EOS 6D MarkII, Tokyo, Japan) to detail the morphology of the conidiomata, conidiophores, and conidiogenous cells using a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ745, Tokyo, Japan) and biological microscope (Ni-U, Tokyo, Japan) with a digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Images were analyzed using Digimizer 5.4.4 software for various size parameters of fungal structures. A single colony derived from the purified culture was cut into 1 cm2 pieces and preserved in 10% glycerol and sterile water at 4°C for further detailed study.
2.3 DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing
A fungal DNA Mini-kit (OMEGA-D3390, Feiyang Biological Engineering Corporation, Guangzhou, China) was used to extract fungal genomic DNA from growing hyphae. Genetic loci corresponding to the ITS region were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990; Zou et al., 2022), with primers LR0R and LR5 used to amply the LSU region (Vilgalys and Hester, 1990), primers NS1 and NS4 for the SSU region (White et al., 1990), and primers fRPB1-Ac and fRPB1-Cr for amplification of the rpb1 gene (Matheny et al., 2002; Castlebury et al., 2004), The tef1-α locus was amplified using EF1-983F and EF1-2218R (Rehner and Buckley, 2005). Primer sequences are given in Table 1.
Table 1
| Gene | Primers | Sequence (5′-3′) | PCR cycles | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | ITS5 | GGA AGT AAA AGT CGT AAC AAG G | (95°C: 30 s, 55°C: 30 s, 72°C: 1 min) × 35 cycles | White et al., 1990 |
| ITS4 | TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC | |||
| LSU | LR0R | GTA CCC GCT GAA CTT AAG C | (95°C: 30 s, 52°C: 30 s, 72°C: 1 min) × 35 cycles | Vilgalys and Hester, 1990 |
| LR5 | TCC TGA GGG AAA CTT CG | |||
| SSU | NS1 | GTA GTC ATA TGC TTG TCT C | (95°C: 30 s, 50°C: 30 s, 72°C: 1 min) × 35 cycles | White et al., 1990 |
| NS4 | CTT CCG TCA ATT CCT TTA AG | |||
| rpb1 | fRPB1-Ac | GAR TGY CCD GGD CAY TTY GG | (95°C: 30 s, from 57°C to 72°C at 0.2°C/s:30 s, 72°C: 1 min) × 35 cycles | Matheny et al., 2002; Castlebury et al., 2004 |
| fRPB1-Cr | CCNGCDATNTCRTTRTCCATRTA | |||
| tef1-α | EF1-983F | GCYCCYGGHCAYCGTGAYTT | (95°C: 30 s, 57°C: 30 s, 72°C: 1 min) × 35 cycles | Rehner and Buckley, 2005 |
| EF1-2218R | ATGACACCRACRGCRACRGTYTGYAT |
Gene regions and PCR primers and programs used in this study.
PCR amplification was performed using a Bio-Rad thermal cycler (Hercules, CA, USA). Amplification reactions were performed in 25 μl reaction volumes consisting of 12.5 μl 2 × Rapid Taq Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 1 μl forward and reverse primers (10 μM) (Sangon, Shanghai, China), and 1 μl template genomic DNA, adjusted with sterile deionized water to a total of 25 μl. The integrity and sizes of PCR products were estimated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. All PCR products were purified, and their nucleotide sequences were determined by a commercial service (Tsingke Company Limited, Fuzhou, China). Sequence assembly was performed using MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016). The new sequences generated in this study have been uploaded to GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accession numbers given in Table 2).
Table 2
| Species | Culture/voucher | Country | GenBank accession number | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | LSU | SSU | tef1-α | rpb1 | |||
| Barretomyces calatheae | CBS 129274 = CPC 18464 | Brazil | KM484831 | KM484950 | – | – | KM485045 |
| Bambusicularia brunnea | CBS 133599 | Japan | KM484830 | KM484948 | – | – | KM485043 |
| Bambusicularia brunnea | CBS 133600 | Japan | AB274436 | KM484949 | – | – | KM485044 |
| Bifusisporella bambooensis | CGMCC3.25653 | China | PP159031 | PP159039 | – | PP488459 | PP488463 |
| Bifusisporella bambooensis | CGMCC3.27207 | China | PP477445 | PP477439 | – | PP488461 | PP488465 |
| Bifusisporella fujianensis | CGMCC3.25651 | China | PP159030 | PP159038 | – | PP488458 | PP488462 |
| Bifusisporella fujianensis | CGMCC3.27206 | China | PP477444 | PP477438 | – | PP488460 | PP488464 |
| Bifusisporella fusispora | SICAU 23-0027 | China | OR405944 | OR405925 | – | OR947488 | – |
| Bifusisporella graminicola | YNE00934 | China | MW479074 | MW478089 | – | MW482636 | MW482801 |
| Bifusisporella graminicola | YNE01000 | China | MW479075 | MW478090 | – | MW482641 | MW482802 |
| Bifusisporella graminis | YNE01143 | China | MW479087 | MW478068 | – | MW482644 | MW482809 |
| Bifusisporella graminis | YNE00994 | China | MW479084 | MW478066 | – | MW482643 | MW482808 |
| Bifusisporella magnumsp. nov. | CGMCC3.27816T | China | PQ380230 | PQ380232 | – | PQ45631 | PQ456329 |
| Bifusisporella magnumsp. nov. | CGMCC3.27817 | China | PQ380231 | PQ380233 | – | PQ45632 | PQ45630 |
| Bifusisporella sorghi | URM 7442 | Brazil | MK060155 | MK060153 | – | MK060157 | MK060159 |
| Bifusisporella sorghi | URM 7864 | Brazil | MK060156 | MK060154 | – | MK060158 | MK060160 |
| Bifusisporella sichuanensis | SICAUCC 22-0073 | China | ON227097 | ON227101 | – | ON244427 | ON244428 |
| Bussabanomyces longisporus | CBS 125232 | Thailand | KM484832 | KM484951 | – | KM009202 | KM485046 |
| Buergenerula spartinae | ATCC 22848 | USA | JX134666 | DQ341492 | – | JX134692 | JX134720 |
| Falciphora oryzae | CBS 125863 = R 5-6-l | China | EU636699 | KJ026705 | – | JN857963 | KJ026706 |
| Falciphoriella solaniterrestris | CBS 117.83 | Netherlands | KM484842 | KM484959 | – | – | KM485058 |
| Gaeumannomycella graminis | CPC 26020 = CBS 141384 | USA | KX306498 | KX306568 | – | KX306701 | KX306633 |
| Gaeumannomycella graminicola | CPC 26025 = CBS 141381 | USA | KX306495 | KX306565 | – | KX306698 | KX306630 |
| Gaeumannomycella caricis | CPC 26262 = CBS 141374 | UK | KX306478 | KX306548 | – | KX306675 | KX306671 |
| Gaeumannomycella caricis | CBS 388.81 | UK | KM484843 | KM484960 | – | KX306674 | – |
| Gaeumannomyces floridanus | CPC 26037 | USA | KX306491 | KX306561 | – | KX306693 | KX306626 |
| Gaeumannomyces fusiformis | CPC 26068 | USA | KX306492 | KX306562 | – | KX306694 | KX306627 |
| Gaeumannomyces glycinicola | CPC 26266 | USA | KX306494 | KX306564 | – | KX306696 | KX306629 |
| Gaeumannomyces glycinicola | CPC 26057 | USA | KX306493 | KX306563 | – | KX306695 | KX306628 |
| Gaeumannomyces graminicola | CBS 352.93 | – | KM484834 | DQ341496 | – | KX306697 | KM485050 |
| Gaeumannomyces graminis | CPC 26045 | – | KX306505 | KX306575 | – | KX306708 | KX306640 |
| Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis | M33 | – | JF710374 | JF414896 | – | JF710411 | JF710442 |
| Gaeumannomyces graminis var. graminis | M54 | – | JF414848 | JF414898 | – | JF710419 | JF710444 |
| Gaeumannomyces hyphopodioides | CBS 350.77 | UK | KX306506 | KX306576 | – | – | – |
| Gaeumannomyces hyphopodioides | CBS 541.86 | Germany | KX306507 | KX306577 | – | KX306709 | – |
| Gaeumannomyces oryzicola | CPC 26063 | USA | KX306516 | KX306586 | – | KX306717 | KX306646 |
| Gaeumannomyces oryzinus | CPC 26030 | Bahamas | KX306517 | KX306587 | – | KX306718 | KX306647 |
| Gaeumannomyces radicicola | CBS 296.53 | Canada | KM009170 | KM009158 | – | KM009206 | KM009194 |
| Gaeumannomyces setariicola | CPC 26059 | South Africa | KX306524 | KX306594 | – | KX306725 | KX306654 |
| Gaeumannomyces tritici | CBS 273.36 | Argentina | KX306525 | KX306595 | – | KX306729 | KX306655 |
| Gaeumannomyces walkeri | CPC 26028 | USA | KX306543 | KX306613 | – | KX306746 | KX306670 |
| Gaeumannomyces wongoonoo | BRIP:60376 | Australia | KP162137 | KP162146 | – | – | – |
| Kohlmeyeriopsis medullaris | CBS 117849 = JK5528S | USA | KM484852 | KM484968 | – | – | KM485068 |
| Macgarvieomyces borealis | CBS 461.65 | UK | MH858669 | DQ341511 | – | KM009198 | KM485070 |
| Macgarvieomyces juncicola | CBS 610.82 | Netherlands | KM484855 | KM484970 | – | KM009201 | KM485071 |
| Magnaporthaceae incertaesedis | CPC 26284 = GP57 | UK | KX306546 | KX306616 | – | KX306677 | – |
| Magnaporthiopsis sp. | CPC 26038 | USA | KX306545 | – | – | KX306676 | KX306672 |
| Magnaporthiopsis incrustans | M35 | – | JF414843 | JF414892 | – | – | JF710437 |
| Magnaporthiopsis maydis | CBS 133165 | Israel | KX306544 | KX306614 | – | – | – |
| Magnaporthiopsis maydis | CBS 662.82A | Egypt | KM484856 | KM484971 | – | – | KM485072 |
| Magnaporthiopsis cynodontis | RS7-2 = CBS 141700 | USA | KJ855508 | KM401648 | – | KP282714 | KP268930 |
| Magnaporthiopsis cynodontis | RS5-5 | USA | KJ855506 | KM401646 | – | KP282712 | KP268928 |
| Magnaporthiopsis cynodontis | RS3-1 | USA | KJ855505 | KM401645 | – | KP282711 | KP268927 |
| Magnaporthiopsis meyeri-festucae | FF2 | – | MF178146 | MF178151 | – | MF178167 | MF178162 |
| Magnaporthiopsis meyeri-festucae | SCR11 | – | MF178150 | MF178155 | – | MF178171 | MF178166 |
| Magnaporthiopsis panicorum | CM2S8 | – | KF689643 | KF689633 | – | KF689623 | KF689613 |
| Magnaporthiopsis panicorum | CM10s2 | – | KF689644 | KF689634 | – | KF689624 | KF689614 |
| Magnaporthiopsis rhizophila | M22 | – | JF414833 | JF414882 | – | JF710407 | JF710431 |
| Nakataea oryzae | CBS 332.53 | USA | KM484867 | KM484981 | – | – | KM485083 |
| Nakataea oryzae | CBS 252.34 | Burma | KM484862 | KM484976 | – | – | KM485078 |
| Nakataea oryzae | CBS 288.52 | Japan | KM484864 | KM484978 | – | – | KM485080 |
| Neogaeumannomyces bambusicola | MFLUCC 11-0390 | Thailand | KP744449 | KP744492 | – | – | – |
| Neopyricularia commelinicola | CBS 128307 = KACC 44083 | Korea | FJ850125 | KM484984 | – | KM009199 | KM485086 |
| Neopyricularia commelinicola | CBS 128308 | Korea | FJ850122 | KM484985 | – | – | KM485087 |
| Omnidemptus affinis | ATCC 200212 | Australia | JX134674 | KX134686 | – | JX134700 | JX134728 |
| Omnidemptus affinis | YNE00716 | – | MW478951 | – | – | MW482673 | MW482812 |
| Omnidemptus affinis | YNE00622 | – | MW478950 | MW478069 | – | MW482672 | MW482811 |
| Omnidemptus graminis | CBS 138107 | – | MK487758 | MK487734 | – | MK495980 | – |
| Omnidemptus graminis | ZJE01803 | – | MW478956 | – | – | – | – |
| Ophioceras dolichostomum | CBS 114926 = HKUCC 3936 = KM 8 | China | JX134677 | JX134689 | – | JX134703 | JX134731 |
| Ophioceras leptosporum | CBS 894.70 = ATCC 24161 = HME 2955 | UK | JX134678 | JX134690 | – | JX134704 | JX134732 |
| Proxipyricularia zingiberis | CBS 132355 | Japan | AB274433 | KM484987 | – | – | KM485090 |
| Proxipyricularia zingiberis | CBS 133594 | Japan | AB274434 | KM484988 | – | – | KM485091 |
| Pseudophialophora eragrostis | CM12m9 | USA | KF689648 | KF689638 | – | KF689628 | KF689618 |
| Pseudopyricularia cyperi | CBS 133595 | Japan | KM484872 | KM484990 | – | – | AB818013 |
| Pseudopyricularia kyllingae | CBS 133597 | Japan | KM484876 | KM484992 | – | KT950880 | KM485096 |
| Pyricularia grisea | BR0029 | Brazil | KM484880 | KM484995 | – | – | KM485100 |
| Pyricularia grisea | CR0024 | Korea | KM484882 | KM484997 | – | – | KM485102 |
| Pyricularia ctenantheicola | GR0001 = Ct-4 = ATCC 200218 | Greece | KM484878 | KM484994 | – | – | KM485098 |
| Pyricularia oryzae | CBS 365.52 = MUCL 9451 | Japan | KM484890 | KM485000 | – | – | KM485110 |
| Slopeiomyces cylindrosporus | CBS 609.75 | UK | KM484944 | KM485040 | – | JX134693 | KM485158 |
| Utrechtiana cibiessia | CBS 128780 = CPC 18916 | Netherlands | JF951153 | JF951176 | – | – | KM485047 |
| Xenopyricularia zizaniicola | CBS 132356 | Japan | KM484946 | KM485042 | – | KM009203 | KM485160 |
| Kalmusia araucariae | CPC 37475 | USA | MT223805 | MT223900 | – | – | – |
| Kalmusia cordylines | ZHKUCC 21-0092 | China | NR_184482 | NG_088312 | – | – | – |
| Kalmusia cordylines | ZHKU 21-0003 | China | – | OL818333 | OL818335 | – | – |
| Kalmusia ebuli | CBS 123120 | – | – | JN644073 | JN851818 | – | – |
| Kalmusia erioi | MFLU 18-0832 | Thailand | – | MN473052 | – | MN481599 | – |
| Kalmusia spartii | MFLUCC 14-0560 | – | – | NG_070926 | NG_063569 | – | – |
| Kalmusia italica | MFLUCC 13-0066 | Thailand | – | NG_070925 | NG_070109 | – | – |
| Kalmusia longispora | T15142 | – | MN945157 | MN945151 | – | – | – |
| Kalmusia longispora | CBS:582.83 | Canada | – | MH873371 | – | – | – |
| Kalmusia longispora | CBS:824.84 | Germany | MH861838 | MH873526 | – | – | – |
| Kalmusia sarothamni | CBS 116474 | China | KF796676 | KF796673 | KF796672 | – | – |
| Kalmusia sarothamni | CBS 113833 | China | – | KF796671 | KF796670 | – | – |
| Kalmusia spartii | MFLU 14-0751 | Thailand | KP744441 | KP744487 | KP753953 | – | – |
| Kalmusia utahensis | CBS:127794 | USA | MH864709 | MH876142 | – | – | – |
| Kalmusia variispora | CBS 121517 | Syria | MH863113 | MH874668 | – | – | – |
| Laburnicola hawksworthii | MFLUCC 13-0602 | Thailand | KU743194 | KU743195 | KU743196 | – | – |
| Laburnicola muriformis | MFLUCC 16-0290 | Thailand | KU743197 | KU743198 | KU743199 | KU743213 | – |
| Laburnicola muriformis | MFLUCC 14-0921 | Thailand | KU743200 | KU743201 | KU743202 | – | – |
| Letendraea magnoliae | MFLUCC 19-0052 | Thailand | MW222160 | – | – | MW233021 | – |
| Letendraea bambusaesp. nov. | CGMCC3.28309T | China | PQ218951 | PQ218949 | PQ218947 | PQ282134 | – |
| Letendraea bambusaesp. nov. | CGMCC3.28310 | China | PQ218952 | PQ218950 | PQ218948 | PQ282135 | – |
| Letendraea cordylinicola | MFLUCC 11_0148 | Thailand | NR_154118 | NG_059530 | NG_068362 | – | – |
| Letendraea cordylinicola | MFLUCC11_0150 | Thailand | KM213996 | KM213999 | KM214001 | – | – |
| Letendraea helminthicola | MFLUCC:19-0055 | – | MW222161 | MW209732 | MW209735 | MW233020 | – |
| Letendraea helminthicola | CBS884_85 | China | MK404145 | AY016362 | AY016345 | MK404174 | – |
| Letendraea padouk | CBS485.70 | China | – | AY849951 | – | – | – |
| Letendraea eurotioides | CBS 212.31 | – | – | AY787935 | – | – | – |
| Letendraea sp. | UTHSC:DI16-267 | – | LT796861 | LN907410 | – | LT797101 | – |
| Letendraea sp. | UTHSC:DI16-370 | – | LT796908 | LN907513 | – | LT797148 | – |
| Letendraea sp. | UTHSC:DI16-351 | – | LT796897 | LN907494 | – | LT797137 | – |
| Spegazzinia tessarthra | SH 287 | Japan | – | AB807584 | AB797294 | AB808560 | – |
| Spegazzinia radermacherae | C264 | Thailand | MK347740 | MK347957 | MK347848 | – | – |
Species and GenBank accession numbers of DNA sequences used in this study, with new sequences indicated in bold.
Ex-type strains are labeled with “T” in this study.
2.4 Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
Sets of orthologous sequences for all loci were downloaded from GenBank. All sequences were aligned using the MAFFT v. 7 online service (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, accessed on 27 September 2024) (Katoh et al., 2019) and manually adjusted in BioEdit v .7.2.6.1 (He et al., 2022) and MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016). Using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses, phylogenetic trees were constructed to explore the evolutionary relationships of fungi within the Magnaporthaceae and Didymosphaeriaceae families, respectively. Spegazzinia tessarthra (SH 287) and Spegazzinia radermacherae (C264) were selected as outgroup taxa of Didymosphaeriaceae. Ophioceras dolichostomum (CBS 114926) and Ophioceras leptosporum (CBS 894.70) (Ophioceraceae, Magnaporthales) were used as outgroup taxa of Magnaporthaceae (Zhao et al., 2024).
Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) was assessed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods (Rannala and Yang, 1996; Zhaxybayeva and Gogarten, 2002). Two parallel runs were conducted, each with four chains, starting from 2,000,000 generations of random trees, sampling every 100 generations, resulting in a total of 20,000 trees, the average standard deviation of split frequencies was set to be < 0.01, starting from random trees (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003). The first 25% of the trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining 75% were used to calculate the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) for the majority rule consensus tree (Ji et al., 2022). The consensus trees were visualized in FigTree v.1.4.4 (https://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree; Rambaut, 2018) and were embellished using Adobe Illustrator CS 6.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., USA). Maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (≥0.90) were considered as significantly supported branches. The new sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; accessed on 12 October 2024).
3 Results
3.1 Phylogenetic analysis
A total of two samples were collected from diseased bamboo leaves. Of these, four purified fungal colonies were obtained. Genomic DNA was extracted from all specimens and the nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the 28S large subunit of ribosomal RNA (LSU), the 18S small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (SSU), the large subunit of RNA polymerase I (rpb1), the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (tef1-α) gene were determined as detailed in the Materials and Methods section.
For construction of the phylogenetic tree of isolates matching Magnaporthaceae, the concatenated sequence dataset of ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and rpb1 was used in analyses which included 83 taxa with Ophioceras dolichostomum (CBS 114926) and Ophioceras leptosporum (CBS 894.70) as the outgroup (Figure 1). For each fungal isolate, 2,869 bp of nucleotide sequences corresponding to portions of the ITS, LSU, rpb1, and tef1-α loci (ITS: 1–433; LSU: 434–1,213; rpb1: 1,214–1,981; tef1-α: 1,982–2,869) were isolated. Based on these and morphological data, a new species, Bifusisporella magnum, was identified, related to Bifusisporella bambooensis (CGMCC3.25653), with high support (ML-BS: 98% and BYPP: 1). For Bifusisporella magnum, 1,346 distinct and 398 variable nucleotide sequences, including gaps were identified, with 909 patterns parsimony informative. ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) was used to select the best-fit model using AIC criterion, maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al., 2015) under the GTR+R4+F model for 5000 ultrafast (Minh et al., 2013) bootstraps, as well as the Shimodaira–Hasegawa–like approximate likelihood-ratio test (Guindon et al., 2010) (Lsetnst = 1, rates = Invgamma). Average standard deviation of split frequencies was 0.004924. Based on these analyses, the two isolates of Bifusisporella described herein represent one novel species.
Figure 1
For the Letendraea isolates, in our dataset, the ITS + LSU + SSU + tef1-α concatenated sequence dataset had an aligned length of 2,654 total characters (ITS: 1–405, LSU: 406–1,176, SSU: 1,177–1,941, tef1-α: 1,942–2,654) including gaps, of which 2,282 characters were constant, 151 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 221 bp were parsimony-informative. ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) was employed to choose the best-fit model based on AIC criterion, maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al., 2015) under the TIM2e+R2 model for 5,000 ultrafast (Minh et al., 2013) bootstraps, as well as the Shimodaira–Hasegawa–like approximate likelihood-ratio test (Lsetnst = 1, rates = Equal) (Guindon et al., 2010). Bayesian analyses resulted in an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.003168. The topology shown by ML and BI were almost identical, although there were slight differences in statistical support for some branches (Figure 2). Based on phylogenetic resolution and morphological analysis, we report a new species of Didymosphaeriaceae: Letendraea bambusae, with the two strains studied herein representing one novel species. The new species Letendraea bambusae clustered alongside Letendraea sp. (UTHSC: DI16-267) and formed a clade sister to Letendraea sp. (UTHSC: DI16-267) with a posterior probability of 1.
Figure 2
3.2. Taxonomy
Bifusisporella magnum sp. nov. Z.Y. Zhao, X.Y. Guan and J.Z. Qiu (Figure 3).
Figure 3
MycoBank: MB856574
Holotype: China, Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (119°14′35.14″E, 26°5′2.55″N), from diseased leaves of bamboo in China, March 2023, Z.Y. Zhao (holotype HMAS353209; ex-type living culture CGMCC3.27816).
Etymology: From Latin magnus (“great”). In reference to the large sized conidiogenous cells.
Description: The oval-shaped leaf spots feature a gradient of color, shifting from white at the periphery to brown at the center. Conidiomata emits droplets that form distinct, black, spherical protrusions on the agar surface. Conidiophores reduced to conidiophores cells. Conidiogenous cells are cylindrical or pot-shaped, solitary or clustered, curved, and elongated in shape. 18.8–30.4 × 4.6–6.4 μm, mean ± SD = 22.5 ± 4.7 × 5.4 ± 0.9 μm, n = 20. Conidia are sickle-shaped or crescent-shaped, with a smooth or cracked surface, and are transparent. 0–4 septa, 11.8–28.9 × 2.1–4.3 μm, mean ± SD = 21.2 ± 4.4 × 3.5 ± 0.6 μm, n = 30.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA are fluffy, velvety, and grayish-white, calculated growth rate of 0.6 cm/day at 25°C.
Material examined: China, Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (119°14′35.14″E, 26°5′2.55″N), from diseased leaves of bamboo in China, March 2023, Z.Y. Zhao (paratype HMAS353210; ex-paratype living culture CGMCC3.27817).
Notes: In this study, two isolates corresponding to the genus Bifusisporella was collected from the Bambusoideae. The strain of the genus Bifusisporella was identified as a new species, with the two isolates representing one species. Phylogenetic analysis utilizing four genomic loci revealed that B. magnum constitutes a distinct clade, closely related to B. bambooensis (CGMCC3.25653), and this classification is strongly supported by statistical evidence (98% ML/1 pp). Compared to B. bambooensis, B. magnum sp. nov. has larger conidiogenous cells and smaller conidia (18.8–30.4 × 4.6–6.4 vs. 7.2–21.0 × 4.2–6.4 μm; 11.8–28.9 × 2.1–4.3 vs. 10.8–45.0 × 2.8–4.9 μm); Molecularly, an unnamed sequence that is at least 97% similar to a fully annotated type-derived sequence in a global ITS alignment can be annotated at the family level and often at the genus level (Nilsson et al., 2019), the nucleotide comparison of ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and rpb1 (CGMCC3.27816) showed differences with the sequences of B. bambooensis (CGMCC3.25653), similarities are 16.1% (86/534), 2.8% (22/779), 3.7% (32/869), and 11.6% (73/628), therefore, the strain of the genus Bifusisporella was identified as a new species.
Letendraea bambusae sp. nov. Z.Y. Zhao, X.Y. Guan and J.Z. Qiu (Figure 4).
Figure 4
MycoBank: MB856575
Holotype: China, Fujian Province, Hua'an Bamboo Garden (117°32′23.35″E, 25°0′29.47″N), from diseased leaves of bamboo. June 2023, Z.Y. Zhao (holotype HMAS353152; ex-type living culture CGMCC3.28309).
Etymology: The epithet “bambusae” refers to the host, which is bamboo.
Description: The leaf spots are irregular, with colors transitioning from reddish-brown on the outer edges to white at the center. Conidiomata bulging on agar, transparent to pink, spherical in aggregate; conidiophores hyaline, smooth, subcylindrical, conidia are round or oval, with smooth surface, initially transparent and becoming olive or brown upon maturation, 3.6–5.9 × 2.1–3.9 μm, mean ± SD = 4.7 ± 0.6 × 3.0 ± 0.4 μm, n = 40.
Culture characteristics: the colonies on PDA are fluffy and velvety, with the colony surface appearing white, the reverse side of the colony transitions from a nearly circular, pale-yellow center to a reddish-brown color as it extends outwards. The growth rate was 0.7 cm/day.
Material examined: China, Fujian Province, Hua'an Bamboo Garden (117°32′23.35″E, 25°0′29.47″N), from diseased leaves of bamboo. June 2023, Z.Y. Zhao (paratype HMAS353153; ex-paratype living culture CGMCC3.28310).
Notes: In this study, the two isolates originated from diseased bamboo leaves. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these isolates represent the same species and cluster together with Letendraea sp. (UTHSC: DI16-267) on a single clade, with high statistical support for their differences (BYPP = 1, ML-BS = 84%), the nucleotide comparison of ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α (CGMCC3.28309) showed differences with the sequences of a closely related species Letendraea helminthicola (MFLUCC 19-0055), similarities were 19.0% (104/548), 57.5% (454/790), 1.0% (10/954), and 73.6% (559/759).
4 Discussion
The subtropical region of China is considered as an important area rich in biodiversity and a significant nature reserve for endemic plants (Dai et al., 2018). Fujian Province is located in the eastern part of the subtropical region, and rainfall comes from the East Asian monsoon, which determines the vegetation characteristics of East Asia (Webster et al., 1998). The main vegetation are evergreen broad-leaved forests, and the main tree species in Fujian include Masson's pine, bamboo forests, and willow trees (Zhu and Tan, 2024). The diversity of tree species in Fujian, combined with a warm and humid climate, is an important factor in promoting the proliferation of related fungi (Liu et al., 2024). In this study, two new species (Bifusisporella magnum sp. nov., and Letendraea bambusae sp. nov.) from Fujian Province, China are identified and described.
Members of the Magnaporthaceae family exists in all trophic levels of plants, including roots, stems, and leaves (Shearer et al., 1999). Many of these fungi display host preferences, especially those parasitic on the plants of Poaceae and Cyperaceae (Luo and Zhang, 2013; Yuan et al., 2010). In a study of endophytic fungi in Brazilian two-color sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) leaves, Bifusisporella was proposed as a new genus based on asexual morphological characteristics such as macroconidia and microconidia (Silva et al., 2019). Currently, four Bifusisporella species have been reported isolated healthy sorghum leaves (Silva et al., 2019). B. sichuanensis was proposed by Zeng et al. (2022) for strains isolated from the leaves of poplar trees in Sichuan Province, China, while B. fujianensis and B. bambooensis were proposed by Zhao et al. (2024) for strains isolated from diseased bamboo leaves. Here, B. magnum sp. nov. is also proposed for strains isolated from diseased bamboo leaves. It is likely that these fungi evolved from endophytic predecessors, as evidenced by conserved traits of appressorium development and lignocellulose-degrading enzyme secretion (Bhunjun et al., 2024). Many endophytic fungi within the Magnaporthales order possess the enzymatic machinery for cellulose and lignin decomposition, despite these functions being non-essential for their endophytic existence. The majority of Bifusisporella species generate melanized appressoria that closely resemble those observed in pathogenic fungi in both morphology and structure. Phylogenetic conservation of infection structures (appressoria) and lignocellulolytic machinery among Magnaporthales endophytes indicates evolutionary predisposition for niche flexibility, including possible pathogenic/saprobic conversions under ecological pressures (Konta et al., 2023; Feng et al., 2024).
Saccardo (1880) introduced the genus Letendraea, with L. eurotioides as its type species. Species of Letendraea often cause infections in various terrestrial habitats and have been associated with leaf spot diseases in the asparagus (Cordyline sp.) family. These fungi exhibit a similar morphology to Wilmia, a monotypic genus, containing the single species Wilmia brasiliensis. However, Wilmia (formerly known as Phaeosphaeriaceae) has been demonstrated to be synonymous with Letendraea (Didymosphaeriaceae) (Ariyawansa et al., 2014b). Currently, Letendraea contains four strains with L. eurotioides (CBS 212.31), L. padouk (CBS 485.70), L. helminthicola (CBS 884.85), L. cordylinicola (MFLUCC11-0148T, MFLUCC 11-0150). Our data add one new species to this group, L. bambusae sp. nov., along with a detailed description and its morphological illustration.
The taxonomic study of bambusicolous fungi has become an important research topic due to the increasing cultivation and use of bamboo worldwide (Dai et al., 2018; Phookamsak et al., 2022). East Asia, as the global center of bamboo distribution (especially China, Japan, and Korea), has rich bamboo species resources (Bambusoideae), but in-depth studies on the phylogenetic classification of bambusicolous fungi remain scarce (Hyde et al., 2002), resulting in a lack of molecular data that could help elucidate a significantly greater proportion of the diversity of bamboo associating fungi. Our data describe two new species and provides additional resources in the exploration of the ecology of bambusicolous fungi in East Asia. These results expand our knowledge of bambusicolous fungi, and also provides new insights into the range and potential specificity of their interactions in East Asia.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article.
Author contributions
XG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. NK: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. TM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MZhe: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. LY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. YM: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. JS: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – original draft. JY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. HP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – original draft. MZhu: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. HLv: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. ZH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. HLi: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. LF: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. XM: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. HM: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. ZQ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. JQ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The research was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32270029, U1803232, and 31670026), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFE0122000), a Social Service Team Support Program Project (No. 11899170165), Science and Technology Innovation Special Fund (Nos. KFB23084, CXZX2019059S, and CXZX2019060G) of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, a Fujian Provincial Major Science and Technology Project (No. 2022NZ029017), an Investigation and evaluation of biodiversity in the Jiulong River Basin (No. 082·23259-15), Macrofungal and microbial resource investigation project in Longqishan Nature Reserve (No. SMLH2024(TP)-JL003#), and an Investigation of macrofungal diversity in Junzifeng National Nature Reserve, Fujian Province (No. Min Qianyu Sanming Recruitment 2024-23).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Weibin Zhang, Jinhui Chen, Chenjie Yang, Sen Liu at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China, for their help with collecting samples. The authors would also like to thank China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center and Fungarium (HMAS), Institute of Microbiology, CAS for strain and sample storage help.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AriyawansaH. A.CamporesiE.ThambugalaK. M.MapookA.KangJ. C.AliasS. A.et al. (2014a). Confusion surrounding Didymosphaeria — phylogenetic and morphological evidence suggest Didymosphaeriaceae is not a distinct family. Phytotaxa176, 102–119. 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.12
2
AriyawansaH. A.TanakaK.ThambugalaK. M.PhookamsakR.TianQ.CamporesiE.et al. (2014b). A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Didymosphaeriaceae (= Montagnulaceae). Fungal Divers. 68, 69–104. 10.1007/s13225-014-0305-6
3
BarrM. E. (1990). Melanommatales (Loculoascomycetes). N. Am. Fl.13, 1–129.
4
BhunjunC. S.PhukhamsakdaC.HydeK. D.McKenzieE. H. C.SaxenaR. K.LiQ.et al. (2024). Do all fungi have ancestors with endophytic lifestyles?Fungal Divers. 125, 73–98. 10.1007/s13225-023-00516-5
5
CannonP. F. (1994). The newly recognized family Magnaporthaceae and its interrelationships. Syst. Ascomycetum13, 25–42.
6
CastleburyL. A.RossmanA. Y.SungG. H.HytenA. S.SpataforaJ. W. (2004). Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotrys chartarum, the indoor air fungus. Mycol. Res.108, 864–872. 10.1017/S0953756204000607
7
DaiD. Q.BahkaliA. H.AriyawansaH. A.LiW. J.BhatJ. D.ZhaoR. L.et al. (2016). Neokalmusia didymospora (Didymosphaeriaceae), a new species from bamboo. Sydowia68, 17–25. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.01.020
8
DaiD. Q.TangL. Z.WangH. B. (2018). A review of Bambusicolous Ascomycetes. Bamboo Curr. Future Prospect. 2018, 165–183. 10.5772/intechopen.76463
9
DlaminiL. C.FakudzeS.MakombeG. G.MuseS.ZhuJ. (2022). Bamboo as a valuable resource and its utilization in historical and modern-day China. BioResources17, 1926–1938. 10.15376/biores.17.1.Dlamini
10
FengJ. W.ChenX. Y.ChenK. Y.DruzhininaI. S.VoglmayrH.CrousP. W.et al. (2024). A reappraisal of families within the order Magnaporthales and description ofnew endophytic taxa associated with Poaceae plants in China. Mycosphere15, 6240–6346. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/26
11
GuindonS.DufayardJ. F.LefortV.AnisimovaM.HordijkW.GascuelO.et al. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol.59, 307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010
12
HeJ.HanX.LuoZ. L.XianL.TangS. M.LuoH. M.et al. (2022). Species diversity of Ganoderma (Ganodermataceae, Polyporales) with three new species and a key to Ganoderma in Yunnan Province, China. Front. Microbiol.13:1035434. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1035434
13
HydeK. D.ZhouD. Q.DalisaylT. (2002). Bambusicolous fungi: a review. Fungal Divers. 9, 1–14.
14
JiX.ZhouJ. L.SongC. G.XuT. M.WuD. M.CuiB. K.et al. (2022). Taxonomy, phylogeny and divergence times of Polyporus (Basidiomycota) and related genera. Mycosphere13, 1–52. 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/1
15
JiangH. B.PhookamsakR.HongsananS.BhatD. J.MortimerP. E.SuwannarachN.et al. (2022). A review of bambusicolous Ascomycota in China with an emphasis on species richness in southwest China. Studi. Fungi7:20. 10.48130/SIF-2022-0020
16
KalyaanamoorthyS.MinhB. Q.WongT. K. F.von HaeselerA.JermiinL. S. (2017). ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods14, 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285
17
KatohK.RozewickiJ.YamadaK. D. (2019). MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform.20, 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108
18
KlaubaufS.TharreauD.FournierE.GroenewaldJ. Z.CrousP. W.De VriesR. P.et al. (2014). Resolving the polyphyletic nature of Pyricularia (Pyriculariaceae). Stud. Mycol.79, 85–120. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.004
19
KontaS.TibprommaS.KarunarathnaS. C.SamarakoonM. C.StevenL. S.MapookA.et al. (2023). Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal ten novel taxa in Ascomycota from terrestrial palm substrates (Arecaceae) in Thailand. Mycosphere14, 107–152. 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/2
20
KumarS.StecherG.TamuraK. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol.33, 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054
21
LéveilléJ. H. (1845). Champignons exotiques. Ann. Sci. Nat.3, 38–71.
22
LiuS.ZhuM. J.KeyhaniN. O.WuZ. Y.LvH. J.HengZ. A.et al. (2024). Three new species of Russulaceae (Russulales, Basidiomycota) from Southern China. J. Fungi.10:70. 10.3390/jof10010070
23
LiuW. Y.HuiC. M.WangF.WangM.LiuG. L. (2018). Review of the resources and utilization of bamboo in China. Bamboo Curr. Future Prospect.8, 133–142. 10.5772/intechopen.76485
24
LuoJ.ZhangN. (2013). Magnaporthiopsis, a new genus in Magnaporthaceae (Ascomycota). Mycologia105, 1019–1029. 10.3852/12-359
25
MathenyP. B.LiuY. J.AmmiratiJ. F.HallB. D. (2002). Using RPB1 sequences to improve phylogenetic inference among mushrooms (Inocybe, Agaricales). Am. J. Bot.89, 688–698. 10.3732/ajb.89.4.688
26
MinhB. Q.NguyenM. A.von HaeselerA. (2013). Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol.30, 1188–1195. 10.1093/molbev/mst024
27
MuT. C.LinY. S.KeyhaniN. O.PuH. L.LvZ. Y.LanC. H.et al. (2024). Phylogenetic and morphological evidence for three new species of Diaporthales (Ascomycota) from Fujian Province, China. J. Fungi.10:383. 10.3390/jof10060383
28
MunkA. (1953). The system of the pyrenomycetes. A contribution to avnatural classification of the group Sphaerialessensu Lindau. vDansk Bot Ark15, 1–163.
29
NguyenL. T.SchmidtH. A.von HaeselerA.MinhB. Q. (2015). IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol.32, 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300
30
NilssonR. H.LarssonK. H.TaylorA. F. S.Bengtsson-PalmeJ.JeppesenT. S.SchigelD.et al. (2019). The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res.47, D259–D264. 10.1093/nar/gky1022
31
PhookamsakR.JiangH. B.SuwannarachN.LumyongS.XuJ. C.XuS.et al. (2022). Bambusicolous Fungi in Pleosporales: introducing four novel taxa and a new habitat record for Anastomitrabeculia didymospora. J. Fungi.8:630. 10.3390/jof8060630
32
QiaoZ. P.WangM. Y.LiuJ. F.WangQ. Z. (2022). Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using a novel endophytic fungus Letendraea sp. WZ07: characterization and evaluation of antioxidant, antibacterial and catalytic activities (3-in-1 system). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 138:109301. 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109301
33
RambautA. (2018). Molecular Evolution, Phylogenetics and epidemiology. FigTree ver.1.4.4 software. Available online at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (accessed October 2022).
34
RannalaB.YangZ. H. (1996). Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol.43, 304–311. 10.1007/BF02338839
35
RehnerS. A.BuckleyE. (2005). A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia97, 84–98. 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84
36
RenG.WanasingheD. N.de FariasA. R. G.HydeK. D.YasanthikaE.XuJ.et al. (2022). Taxonomic novelties of woody litter fungi (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) from the greater Mekong subregion. Biology11:1660. 10.3390/biology11111660
37
RonquistF.HuelsenbeckJ. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics19, 1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
38
SaccardoP. A. (1880). Fungi Gallicilecti a cl. viris P. Brunaud, Abb. Letendre, A. Malbranche, J. Therry, velediti in Mycotheca Gallica C. Roumeguèri. Series II. Michelia. 2, 39–135.
39
ShearerC. A.CraneJ. L.ChenW. (1999). Freshwater Ascomycetes: Ophioceras species. Mycologia91, 145–156. 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061004
40
SilvaR. M. F.OliveiraR. J. V.BezerraJ. D. P.BezerraJ. L.Souza-MottaC. M.SilvaG. A.et al. (2019). Bifusisporellasorghi gen. et sp. nov. (Magnaporthaceae) to accommodate an endophytic fungus from Brazil. Mycol. Prog.18, 847–854. 10.1007/s11557-019-01494-2
41
SuD.ZhangW. H.SunR.ZhangZ. T.LyuG. (2021). First report of Botryosphaeria dothidea causing leaf spot on Kadsura coccinea in China. Plant Dis.105:2714. 10.1094/PDIS-01-21-0150-PDN
42
TanakaK.HirayamaK.YonezawaH.HatakeyamaS.HaradaY.SanoT.et al. (2009). Molecular taxonomy of bambusicolous fungi, Tetraplosphaeriaceae, a new pleosporalean family with Tetraploa-like anamorphs. Stud. Mycol.64, 175–209. 10.3114/sim.2009.64.10
43
ThongkanthaS.JeewonR.VijaykrishnaD.LumyongS.McKenzieE. H. C.HydeK. D.et al. (2009). Molecular phylogeny of Magnaporthaceae (Sordariomycetes) with a new species, Ophioceras chiangdaoense from Dracaena loureiroi in Thailand. Fungal Divers.34, 157–173. 10.1002/yea.1657
44
VilgalysR.HesterM. (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol.172, 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
45
WebsterP. J.MaganaV. O.PalmerT. N.ShuklaJ.TomasR. A.YanaiM.et al. (1998). Monsoons: processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction. J. Geophys. Res.103, 14451–14510. 10.1029/97JC02719
46
WhiteT. J.BrunsT. D.LeeS. B.TaylorJ. W. (1990). “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (San Diego, NY: Academic PRess), 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
47
WijayawardeneN. N.HydeK. D.DaiD. Q.Sánchez-GarcíaM.GotoB. T.SaxenaR. K.et al. (2022). Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere13, 53–453. 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2
48
WysockiW. P.ClarkL. G.AttigalaL.Ruiz-SanchezE.DuvallM. R. (2015). Evolution of the bamboos (Bambusoideae; Poaceae): a full plastome phylogenomic analysis. BMC Evol. Biol.15:50. 10.1186/s12862-015-0321-5
49
YanH. J.ZhangJ. P.TanZ. L.ChenY. C.LiC. N.LiS.et al. (2024). Secondary metabolites from the endophytic fungus Letendraea helminthicola A820 with Anti-inflammatory activity. Chem Biodivers.22:e202402114. 10.1002/cbdv.202402114
50
YanK.ZhangJ.CaiY.CaoG.MengL.SoaudS. A.et al. (2023). Comparative analysis of endophytic fungal communities in bamboo species Phyllostachys edulis, Bambusa rigida, and Pleioblastus amarus. Sci. Rep.13:20910. 10.1038/s41598-023-48187-1
51
YangC. L.XuX. L.ZengQ.LiuL. J.LiuF.DengY.et al. (2024). Bambusicolous mycopathogens in China with an update on taxonomic diversity, novel species, pathogenicity, and new insights. Mycosphere15, 4788–4918. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/21
52
YuanZ. L.LinF. C.ZhangC. L.KubicekC.P. (2010). A new species of Harpophora (Magnaporthaceae) recovered from healthy wild rice (Oryza granulata) roots, representing a novel member of beneficial dark septate endophyte. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.307, 94–101. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01963.x
53
ZengQ.LvY. C.XuX. L.DengY.WangF. H.LiuS. Y.et al. (2022). Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with Phyllostachys (Poaceae) in Sichuan, China. J. Fungi.8:702. 10.3390/jof8070702
54
ZhangZ. X.LiuX. Y.TaoM. F.LiuX. Y.XiaJ. W.ZhangX. G.et al. (2023). Taxonomy, phylogeny, divergence time estimation, and biogeography of the Family Pseudoplagiostomataceae (Ascomycota, Diaporthales). J. Fungi.9:82. 10.3390/jof9010082
55
ZhaoZ. Y.MuT. C.KeyhaniN. O.PuH. L.LinY.LvZ.et al. (2024). Diversity and new species of ascomycota from bamboo in China. J. Fungi.10:454. 10.3390/jof10070454
56
ZhaxybayevaO.GogartenJ. P. (2002). Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genomics3, 1–15. 10.1186/1471-2164-3-4
57
ZhuH.TanY. (2024). The origin of evergreen broad-leaved forests in East Asia from the evidence of floristic elements. Plants13:1106. 10.3390/plants13081106
58
ZouY.HouJ. G.GuoS. N.LiC. T.LiZ.StephensonS. L.et al. (2022). Diversity of dictyostelid cellular slime molds, including two species new to science, in forest soils of Changbai Mountain, China. Microbiol. Spectr.10:e0240222. 10.1128/spectrum.02402-22
Summary
Keywords
Didymosphaeriaceae, Magnaporthaceae, fungal phylogenetics, taxonomy, fungal morphology
Citation
Guan X, Zhao Z, Keyhani NO, Mu T, Zheng M, Yang L, Mao Y, Shang J, Yang J, Pu H, Lin Y, Zhu M, Lv H, Heng Z, Liang H, Fan L, Ma X, Ma H, Qiu Z and Qiu J (2025) Two new species of Ascomycota on bamboo leaves in Fujian, China. Front. Microbiol. 16:1555501. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1555501
Received
04 January 2025
Accepted
22 May 2025
Published
20 June 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Wen-Jun Li, Sun Yat-sen University, China
Reviewed by
Jing Si, Beijing Forestry University, China
ZongLong Luo, Dali University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Guan, Zhao, Keyhani, Mu, Zheng, Yang, Mao, Shang, Yang, Pu, Lin, Zhu, Lv, Heng, Liang, Fan, Ma, Ma, Qiu and Qiu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhenxing Qiu qiuzhenxing2006@126.comJunzhi Qiu junzhiqiu@126.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.