In the original article, there were errors. Three numbers were incorrectly added due to mistaken data import from SPSS into the submitted manuscript. A correction has been made to Discussion, The Type and Length of the Stent, Paragraph 1. The corrected paragraph is shown below.
In our controlled study, the rate of ISR ≥ 50% was significantly higher in the balloon-mounted stent group than in the self-expandable stent group (33.3 vs. 12.5%). The rate of restenosis was slightly higher than that in our earlier study (20.3%) with coronary artery stents and the VISSIT study (26.5%) (4, 16), but was similar to Jin's study, which showed that the restenosis rate with the Apollo stent was 27.5% (24/87) vs. the Wingspan, which was 24.6% (17/69). In a recent study, Baik et al. reported insertion of a balloon-expandable stent (BES) with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis, and the overall incidence of restenosis or reocclusion was 14.7% (5/34) with long-term follow-up (17). We concluded that 19 patients presented restenosis by performing balloon-mounted stents, including seven cases with basilar artery stenosis and four cases with intracranial vertebral artery stenosis. Therefore, in-stent restenosis of endovascular treatment for stenosis with this type of stent could be associated with the location of lesions, particularly in the posterior circulation.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
cerebrovascular disease, stroke, endovascular treatment, interventional neurology, intracranial in-stent restenosis
Citation
Guo X, Ma N, Gao F, Mo D-P, Luo G and Miao Z-R (2021) Corrigendum: Long-Term Risk Factors for Intracranial In-Stent Restenosis From a Multicenter Trial of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis Registry in China. Front. Neurol. 12:673264. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.673264
Received
27 February 2021
Accepted
01 March 2021
Published
30 March 2021
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
12 - 2021
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Guo, Ma, Gao, Mo, Luo and Miao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhong-Rong Miao zhongrongm@163.com
This article was submitted to Endovascular and Interventional Neurology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
†ORCID: Xu Guo orcid.org/0000-0002-8617-3476
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.