The Alteration of Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets During Tacrolimus Therapy in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and Its Correlation With Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Objectives:

We aimed to explore the alteration of circulating lymphocyte subsets before and after tacrolimus (TAC) therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and its correlation with clinical outcomes.

Methods:

Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-ab)-positive patients with NMOSD treated with TAC were followed and clinically evaluated at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation of TAC. Flow cytometry was employed to detect the proportion of various whole blood lymphocyte subsets at every time point. Correlation analysis was further performed to explore the association between annualized relapse rate (ARR), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and the proportion of circulating lymphocyte subsets before and after TAC therapy.

Results:

A total of 13 eligible patients with NMOSD were included. The proportion of CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi/CD19⁺ and CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1d^hi/CD19⁺ lymphocyte subsets increased significantly after TAC therapy (p = 0.010 and p < 0.001). The proportion of CD19⁺BAFFR⁺, CD19⁺IFN-γ⁺, and CD19⁺IL-10⁺ subsets decreased significantly after TAC therapy (p = 0.015, 0.018, and 0.042, respectively). There was a negative correlation between CD4⁺CD25^hi subset and EDSS score (p = 0.016, r = −0.652).

Conclusion:

Possibly through increasing regulatory B and suppressing BAFFR⁺ B and interferon (IFN)-γ⁺ B subsets, TAC could decrease relapse. EDSS score may be correlated with some lymphocyte subsets after TAC therapy.

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) is one of the central nervous systems inflammatory diseases mainly mediated by antiaquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-ab) and involving the optic nerve, spinal cord, and specific brain regions (1). Previous immunological studies have shown that NMOSD was dominated by humoral immunity, with AQP4-ab deposition and complement activation in the lesions (2, 3).

Numerous B cell subsets play important roles in the pathogenesis of NMOSD, including naïve B cells, regulatory B cells, memory B cells, and plasmablasts (4). Follicular helper T cells (Tfh) could promote the differentiation of B cells in the germinal center into memory B cells and plasma cells, thereby participating in the pathogenesis of NMOSD (5). It was generally believed that T helper cell 17 (Th17)-related cytokines such as interleukin-17 (IL-17) and B cell cytokines such as B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) were elevated in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with NMOSD, and whether there were abnormalities in the number and function of regulatory T cells in NMOSD was still controversial (6, 7). Studies have found that the proportion of Tfh in NMOSD during relapse was significantly higher than that in the remission period and healthy controls while the proportion of regulatory B cells and IL-10 during the acute attack was significantly lower than healthy controls (8, 9). High-dose methylprednisolone therapy in NMOSD could significantly reduce the proportion of Tfh and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in B cells (8, 10).

Tacrolimus (TAC) was originally a macrolide compound extracted from the genus Streptomyces tsukubanesis. Although TAC and cyclosporin A (CsA) both belong to calcineurin inhibitors, the potency of TAC is 10–100 times of CsA (11). TAC plays a major role in cellular immunity. It binds to TAC binding protein 12 in the cell and forms a complex to inhibit phosphatase activity, thereby preventing the dephosphorylation and translocation of nuclear factor of activated T cell, inhibiting the transcription of cytokines including IL-2, interfering with the differentiation and proliferation of T cells, thereby inhibiting the inflammation and alleviating the symptoms of autoimmune diseases (12). Studies have shown that TAC could specifically inhibit the number and proportion of Tfh in lymph nodes and blood in kidney transplant patients without affecting regulatory T cells and other subgroups (13). In addition, the proportion of CD19⁺BAFFR⁺ cells in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) decreased after taking TAC (14).

Tacrolimus was previously applied in the field of solid organ transplantation (15). There were also studies using TAC as a maintenance therapy for NMOSD in remission, which proved to be effective in preventing the relapse of NMOSD, reducing annual relapse rate (ARR) and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (16–18). Tacrolimus was less likely to cause leukopenia and liver function damage, making it one of the alternatives for patients who were intolerant of azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Although the imbalance of Tfh and regulatory B cells has been clarified in the immunopathogenesis of NMOSD, there still lacked whether the effectiveness of TAC was related to it. In this study, we aimed to explore the correlation between clinical outcomes and immunological measures during TAC therapy.

Materials and Methods

Participants and Data Collection

This was a single-center prospective observational cohort study. Patients with NMOSD taking TAC (3 mg/d) as maintenance therapy were prospectively included in the Department of Neurology of Huashan Hospital from December 2017 to October 2018. The inclusion criteria were: (1) taking TAC (3 mg/d) combined with or without small dose oral glucocorticoid; (2) not simultaneously receiving other immunosuppressive treatment such as AZA, MMF, cyclophosphamide (CTX), and rituximab (RTX); (3) meeting the diagnostic criteria of NMOSD established by the International Panel in 2015; (4) age ≥ 18 years. Demographics and clinical data were collected, including the number of patients, gender, onset age, disease duration, disease course, serum AQP4-ab or MOG-ab titer, and previous immunotherapy. These patients were followed-up and evaluated during the baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after TAC initiation to record relevant outcomes, including ARR and EDSS scores before and after treatment. Blood samples were taken to detect the proportion of whole blood lymphocyte subsets during each follow-up. We confirmed that no symptoms or data related to infection were detected when blood samples were obtained. During TAC therapy, if the patient had relapsed and received high-dose methylprednisolone therapy, it would affect the proportion of lymphocyte subsets, which were not included in further analysis. Those discontinuing TAC or changing the immunosuppressive agent because of the adverse events within 1 year would not be included in further analysis.

AQP4-ab and MOG-ab Detection

All patients at Huashan Hospital had undergone serum AQP4-ab and MOG-ab detection using fixed cell-based indirect immune-fluorescence test (Euroimmun AG, Lüebeck, Germany) as part of a routine diagnostic approach.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

We separated 200 μl of EDTA-anticoagulated whole venous blood into four tubes. Each was immunostained with fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibodies for 30 min at 4°C in darkness. After red blood cell lysis using FACS Lysing Solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA), the samples were washed twice and resuspended in 200 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The frequencies of different lymphocyte subsets were determined with Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Isotype controls were performed to establish appropriate gating (Table 1).

Cytokine Detection

Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis Missouri, USA) was performed to separate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 6 ml of heparinized blood. Cells from the interface were collected and washed with PBS. Then the cell concentration was adjusted to 1 × 10⁶ cells/ml in RPMI 1,640 including L-glutamine and NaHCO₃ (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) and 10% FBS in 24-well U-bottom plates (Nunc, Langenselbold, Germany). To increase surface expression of B cells, the PBMCs were stimulated with 0.1 mg/ml CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN) 2006 (InvivoGen, San Diego, California, USA) at 37°C with 5% CO₂ for 22 h. During the last 5 h, a 2 μl/ml cell stimulation cocktail (eBioscience, San Jose, California, USA) was added. Then, the cells were immunostained with antihuman CD4 FITC or CD19 PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, San Jose, California, USA) for T or B cells, respectively. Subsequently, the cells were washed, fixed, and permeabilized with the Fix&Perm Kit (Invitrogen, Camarillo California, USA). Antihuman IL-17-PE or IFN-γ FITC and IL-10 PE (eBioscience, San Jose California, USA) were added to the permeabilized T or B cells for intracellular cytokine detection. Appropriate isotype controls were conducted to determine the cytokine detection gates.

Statistical Analysis

In this study, FlowJo X10.0 (FlowJo, LLC., Ashland, Oregon) was used to gate and analyze the FCS files. The data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) while figures were made with Graphpad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software inc., La Jolla CA, USA). Counting data was expressed as count (%). Quantitative data conforming to normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± SD, and one-way repeated measurement ANOVA was applied to compare the proportion of lymphocytes during each follow-up. Bonferroni method was used to correct the significance level of posthoc pairwise comparison. Non-normally distributed quantitative data were presented as median and range, and Friedman rank-sum test was applied to compare the proportion of lymphocytes during each follow-up. Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis was used for the correlation between clinical outcomes and flow cytometry assessment. Correlation and clustering analysis was performed with the corr package in R, version 4.0.3 (http://www.r-project.org/). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Demographic and Clinical Findings

There were 20 patients with NMOSD taking TAC prospectively. After excluding five patients having relapse within 1 year and 2 patients with MOG-ab or seronegative status, 13 AQP4-ab-positive patients were included in this study, with antibody titer ranging from 1:10 to 1:1,000. There were 11 patients taking oral glucocorticoid as a combined therapy. The average onset age was 40.6 ± 15.8 years while the disease course was 42.9 ± 20.6 months. A total of nine patients had a relapsing course while the other patients had a monophasic course before TAC therapy. Five patients used to take immunosuppressive agents and experienced 4–8 weeks of washout period. During the 12 months follow-up period after TAC initiation, no patients experienced NMOSD relapse. The EDSS score and ARR before TAC therapy were 4 (1–5.5) and 1 (0–3). After 12 months of TAC therapy, the EDSS score and ARR were 3 (0–4) and 0 (0–0). The demographical and clinical characteristics of this cohort were listed in Table 2.

Memory, Naïve, Regulatory, and BAFFR⁺B Cells

The proportions of CD19⁺CD27⁺ memory B cells, CD19⁺CD27⁻ naïve B cells, CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi, and CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1d^hi regulatory B cells were measured and compared during each follow-up. The proportion of CD19⁺CD27⁺ memory B cells in total lymphocytes decreased from 3.90 ± 1.95% to 2.92 ± 1.52% gradually (p = 0.113) (Figures 1A, 2A) while the percentage of CD19⁺CD27⁻ naïve B cells in total lymphocytes reduced from 6.39 ± 3.12% to 5.61 ± 2.23% (p = 0.400), which both did not change significantly (Figures 1A, 2B) after TAC therapy. The frequencies of CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi regulatory B cells in CD19+ B lymphocytes increased from 0.69 ± 1.92% to 4.45 ± 3.83% (p = 0.010) (Figures 1B, 2C), while CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1d^hi regulatory B cells in CD19⁺ B lymphocytes enhanced from 11.76 ± 5.94% to 24.63 ± 10.52% with highly statistical significance after TAC therapy (p < 0.001) (Figures 1C, 2D). Compared with baseline, posthoc pairwise comparison exhibited the differences of CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi regulatory B cells (p = 0.023) and CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1d^hi regulatory B cells (p = 0.002) were both statistically significant in 12 months. The proportion of CD19⁺BAFFR⁺ cells in total lymphocytes had a gradual decrease from 11.26 ± 4.13% to 8.00 ± 2.18% with statistical significance after TAC therapy (p = 0.015) (Figures 1D, 2E). And the difference nearly reached statistical significance in 12 months compared to baseline in posthoc pairwise comparison (p = 0.057).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Tfh and Regulatory T Cells

The proportions of CD4⁺CXCR5⁺ICOS⁺ Tfh and CD4⁺CD25^hi regulatory T cells were measured and compared during each follow-up. The percentage of CD4⁺CXCR5⁺ICOS⁺ Tfh in CD4⁺ T lymphocytes enhanced from 0.64 ± 0.37% to 0.87 ± 0.61% (p = 0.412) (Figures 1E, 2F), while CD4⁺CD25^hi regulatory T cells in total lymphocytes increased from 1.24 ± 1.21% to 1.37 ± 1.27% (p = 0.412) (Figures 1F, 2G), which both did not change significantly after TAC therapy.

The Expression of Cytokines in Circulating T and B Cells

The proportion of IL-17 expressing T cells in the total lymphocytes changed slightly from 0.58 ± 0.21% to 0.61 ± 0.27%, which exhibited no statistical difference after TAC therapy (p = 0.794) (Figures 1G, 2H). The frequencies of circulating IFN-γ expressing B cells in the total lymphocytes decreased from 3.36 ± 1.74% to 1.79 ± 1.37% significantly (p = 0.018) (Figures 1H, 2I) while IL-10 expressing B cells in the total lymphocytes decreased from 0.56 ± 0.50% to 0.23 ± 0.15 % significantly (p = 0.042) (Figures 1I, 2J) after TAC therapy, although, in a posthoc analysis, the difference did not reach statistical significance in 12 months compared with baseline.

Correlation and Clustering Analysis

We found that the EDSS score after TAC therapy was negatively correlated with the proportion of CD4⁺CD25^hi cell subsets (p = 0.016, r = −0.652) (Figure 3A). We did not observe the correlation between the change in EDSS score or ARR and the change in the ratio of lymphocyte subsets after TAC therapy. The correlation and clustering analysis of all lymphocyte subsets and clinical outcomes during TAC therapy were exhibited in Figure 3B.

Figure 3

Discussion

This study preliminarily explored the influence of TAC on the proportion of circulating lymphocytes. TAC may reduce relapse by increasing the proportion of regulatory B cells and inhibiting the proportion of BAFFR⁺B cells and IFN-γ⁺ B cells. EDSS score may be correlated with some lymphocyte subsets before and after TAC therapy.

Memory B cells were generally classified as CD19⁺CD27⁺, which mainly secreted inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) while seldom secreted anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, thereby promoting the relapse of NMOSD. And naïve B cells were mainly defined as CD19⁺CD27⁻, which mainly secreted IL-10 while seldom secreted IFN-γ, thereby inhibiting the relapse of NMOSD (4, 19). Compared with the aforementioned studies, our research results further showed that the proportion of circulating memory B cells gradually decreased during TAC therapy. Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.113) possibly from the small sample size, this result could explain the decreased secretion of IFN-γ with a highly statistically significant difference (p = 0.018). The proportion of circulating naïve B cells had a decreased trend during TAC therapy, and the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 400). As the proportion of B cells secreting IFN-γ decreased, this could explain the similar decrease in the proportion of B cells secreting IL-10, and the difference reached statistical significance (p = 0.042). Previous studies demonstrated that the serum IFN-γ and IL-10 in patients with MG under TAC therapy were reduced, which was consistent with our study (14). Therefore, suppressing the proportion of memory B cells may be one of the mechanisms by which TAC exerted an immunosuppressive effect.

Regulatory B cells had different subsets including CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi and CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1d^hi, with the function of secreting IL-10, inducing the function of regulatory T cells, inhibiting Th1, Th17, effector T cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells (20). Studies have shown that the ratio of CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi and IL-10 levels during the acute attack stage were significantly lower than those of healthy control (9). Compared with the aforementioned results, ours further demonstrated that the ratio of CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi and CD19⁺CD5⁺CD1d^hi increased during TAC therapy with statistical significance (p = 0.010 and p < 0.001, respectively). Therefore, increasing the proportion of regulatory B cells may be another mechanism by which TAC performed an immunosuppressive function.

BAFF maintained the survival and differentiation of B cells by binding BAFFR which was mainly expressed on the surface of B cells (21). Previous studies have shown that the levels of cerebrospinal fluid and serum BAFF in patients with NMOSD were increased, which was positively correlated with the EDSS score (22). Studies have also shown that the proportion of CD19⁺BAFFR⁺ cells in patients with MG increased, while the proportion of CD19⁺BAFFR⁺ cells in patients with MG decreased after taking TAC, which was correlated with the improvement of clinical symptoms (14, 23). Similar to the aforementioned results, our study found that the proportion of CD19⁺BAFFR⁺ cells decreased during TAC therapy, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.015). But we did not find a correlation between CD19⁺BAFFR⁺ cells and ARR or EDSS score. This may come from the different pathogenesis and outcome measures of MG and NMOSD.

Tfh, which could help B cells differentiate into memory B cells and plasma cells, played a very important role in autoimmune diseases. Tfh had many types and CD4⁺CXCR5⁺ICOS⁺ was one of the subsets (24). Studies have found that the proportion of follicular helper T cells during relapse was significantly higher than that in the remission period and healthy control (8). It was generally believed that Th17 cell-related cytokines and chemokines in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of NMOSD were elevated, and whether there were abnormalities in the number and function of regulatory T cells in NMOSD was still controversial (6, 7). Previous studies have found that TAC could specifically inhibit the number and proportion of Tfh in lymph nodes and blood in kidney transplant patients without affecting regulatory T cells and other subpopulations (13). Similar to the aforementioned results, we did not find differences in the ratio of CD4⁺CD25^hi cells, CD4⁺CXCR5⁺ICOS⁺ cells, and CD4⁺IL-17⁺ cells during TAC therapy (p = 0.412, 0.245, and 0.794, respectively). The reason might be that the patient was in the remission period and the proportion of T cells in the aforementioned three groups was relatively small. However, we found that the EDSS score after treatment had a negative correlation with the proportion of CD4⁺CD25^hi cells (p = 0.016, r = −0.652). Therefore, the changes in the proportion of T cells in the aforementioned three groups might affect the clinical outcomes of NMOSD after TAC therapy.

Our study had some limitations. First, the number of included patients and follow-up time were limited, therefore, the immunological measures before and after TAC therapy could not be fully evaluated. Second, some patients took small doses of prednisone during TAC therapy, which may have an impact on the immunological measures. In addition, some patients having relapses during TAC therapy were not included. Studies with a larger sample size were needed to further analyze the correlation between clinical and immunological measures.

Conclusion

Possibly through increasing regulatory B and suppressing BAFFR⁺ B and IFN-γ⁺ B subsets, TAC could decrease relapse. EDSS score may be correlated with some lymphocyte subsets after TAC therapy.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82171341 and 81771296), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018SHZDZX01) and ZHANGJIANG LAB, and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0901504).

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1.

  JariusSPaulFWeinshenkerBGLevyMKimHJWildemannB. Neuromyelitis optica. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2020) 6:85. 10.1038/s41572-020-0214-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  HinsonSRPittockSJLucchinettiCFRoemerSFFryerJPKryzerTJet al. Pathogenic potential of IgG binding to water channel extracellular domain in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. (2007) 69:2221–31. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000289761.64862.ce

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  LucchinettiCFMandlerRNMcGavernDBruckWGleichGRansohoffRMet al. A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic's neuromyelitis optica. Brain. (2002) 125:1450–61. 10.1093/brain/awf151

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  BennettJLO'ConnorKCBar-OrAZamvilSSHemmerBTedderTFet al. B lymphocytes in neuromyelitis optica. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. (2015) 2:e104. 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  FanXLinCHanJJiangXZhuJJinT. Follicular helper CD4+ T cells in human neuroautoimmune diseases and their animal models. Mediators Inflamm. (2015) 2015:638968. 10.1155/2015/638968

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  UzawaAMoriMKuwabaraS. Cytokines and chemokines in neuromyelitis optica: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. Brain Pathol. (2014) 24:67–73. 10.1111/bpa.12097

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  WangZYanY. Immunopathogenesis in myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1785. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01785

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  LiYJZhangFQiYChangG-QfuYSuLet al. Association of circulating follicular helper T cells with disease course of NMO spectrum disorders. J Neuroimmunol. (2015) 278:239–46. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.11.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  QuanCYuHQiaoJXiaoBZhaoGWuZet al. Impaired regulatory function and enhanced intrathecal activation of B cells in neuromyelitis optica: distinct from multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. (2013) 19:289–98. 10.1177/1352458512454771

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  QuanCZhangBaoJLuJZhaonCCaiTWangBet al. The immune balance between memory and regulatory B cells in NMO and the changes of the balance after methylprednisolone or rituximab therapy. J Neuroimmunol. (2015) 282:45–53. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.03.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  BiererBEHollanderGFrumanDBurakoffSJ. Cyclosporin A and FK506: molecular mechanisms of immunosuppression and probes for transplantation biology. Curr Opin Immunol. (1993) 5:763–73. 10.1016/0952-7915(93)90135-F

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  FlanaganWMCorthesyBBramRJCrabtreeGR. Nuclear association of a T-cell transcription factor blocked by FK-506 and cyclosporin A. Nature. (1991) 352:803–7. 10.1038/352803a0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  WallinEFHillDLLintermanMAWoodKJ. The Calcineurin Inhibitor Tacrolimus Specifically Suppresses Human T Follicular Helper Cells. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1184. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01184

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  ZhaoCBZhangXZhangHHuX-QLuJ-HLuC-Zet al. Clinical efficacy and immunological impact of tacrolimus in Chinese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2011) 11:519–24. 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.12.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  ZhangXLinGTanLLiJ. Current progress of tacrolimus dosing in solid organ transplant recipients: Pharmacogenetic considerations. Biomed Pharmacother. (2018) 102:107–14. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.054

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  ChenBWuQKeGBuB. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:831. 10.1038/s41598-017-00860-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  TanakaMKinoshitaMTanakaK. Corticosteroid and tacrolimus treatment in neuromyelitis optica related disorders. Mult Scler. (2015) 21:669. 10.1177/1352458514546793

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  WangLTanHHuangWet al. Low-dose tacrolimus in treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2021) 48:102707. 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102707

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  DuddyMNiinoMAdatiaFet al. Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. (2007) 178:6092–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6092

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  RosserECMauriC. Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity. (2015) 42:607–12. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  HoekKLCarlessoGClarkESKhanWN. Absence of mature peripheral B cell populations in mice with concomitant defects in B cell receptor and BAFF-R signaling. J Immunol. (2009) 183:5630–43. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901100

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  WangHWangKZhongXet al. Cerebrospinal fluid BAFF and APRIL levels in neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis patients during relapse. J Clin Immunol. (2012) 32:1007–11. 10.1007/s10875-012-9709-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  LiXXiao BG XiJYLuCZLuJH. Decrease of CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells and elevation of CD19(+)BAFF-R(+) B cells and soluble ICAM-1 in myasthenia gravis. Clini Immunol. (Orlando, Fla). (2008) 126:180–8. 10.1016/j.clim.2007.10.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  CrottyS. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH). Annu Rev Immunol. (2011) 29:621–63. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101400

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar