Abstract
In the evolving modern era of neuromodulation for movement disorders in adults and children, much progress has been made recently characterizing the human motor network (MN) with potentially important treatment implications. Herein is a focused review of relevant resting state fMRI functional and effective connectivity of the human motor network across the lifespan in health and disease. The goal is to examine how the transition from functional connectivity to dynamic effective connectivity may be especially informative of network-targeted movement disorder therapies, with hopeful implications for children.
Introduction
The brain motor networks to supports movement are comprised of complex circuits of cortical and subcortical locations. A common clinical application goal of functional neuroimaging has been to develop the ability to make inferences about phenotype and treatment. Since movement disorders are ultimately network disorders, functional neuroimaging investigations of motor networks and movement benefit from being grounded in the context of network activity (i.e., connectivity). Resting state fMRI, in particular, is attractive to consider due to the relative ease and low patient/subject demand during scans. A question then is in what context is rs-fMRI of potential use.
This review is divided into two main sections with sub-sections. The first section āFunctional Connectivityā briefly introduces the concepts of structural and functional connectivity as well as the neural systems that support them in the context of movement. We then go on to provide a focused review of resting state fMRI functional connectivity in the context of healthy adults, development/aging, movement disorders, and treatment. In the second major section āAdvancements through Effective Connectivity,ā we briefly introduce concepts and methods of effective connectivity and give a focused review of effective connectivity findings related to healthy adults and movement disorders and the potential gains from using effective connectivity methods. In order to appreciate the context of the topics discussed in this review, it is additionally important to understand it in the context that flexible motor behavior is characterized by the ability to attain the same task outcomes using different movement plans, often in a way that adapts to the environment (1).
Functional Connectivity
Motor Network Functional Connectivity in Healthy Adults
Studies of motor network (MN) resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) functional connectivity (FC) build upon those from structural connectivity (SC) in healthy adults. SC refers to anatomical connections and FC refers to correlated activity. While SC often implies and is thought to support FC, the absence of a known anatomical (structural) connection does not negate the possibility of a functional connection (most commonly measured as correlated activity). This is, in part, due to the way that SC and FC are differently determined (physical connection vs. correlated activity) and, in part, because FC can be indirect or the structural connections supporting it may be unknown. Together, studies of SC and FC show that flexible motor behavior is generated and tightly regulated by sophisticated physiological networks residing in the cortex and subcortical structures through a series of topographically organized parallel loops, known as the direct, indirect, and hyperdirect pathways (2ā7). The direct pathway is thought to initiate movement (8, 9), the indirect pathway and the hyperdirect pathway both are involved in movement suppression (5, 8, 9).
Although these network loops are configured in parallel, as evidenced by neuron tracing studies in primates and non-primate animal models and corroborated in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography in healthy adults, they are not completely independent (4, 7, 8, 10). These pathways use several common structures to support movement. These circuits are classically organized as follows: In the direct pathway (simplified), the striatum (consisting of the caudate nucleus and the putamen) receives excitatory cortical input, the putamen, which handles a significant amount of motor input to the striatum, sends inhibitory signal to the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), which, in turn, disinhibits the thalamus. Since the thalamus is generally excitatory toward cortex, this causes excitation toward cortex that supports movement (9). In contrast, in the indirect pathway, motor cortex sends excitatory signal to the striatum, which then inhibits the external segment of the globus pallidus (GPe) causing a disinhibition of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). In turn, the STN sends excitatory signal the GPi/SNr causing the GPi/SNr to inhibit the thalamus ultimately stopping the thalamus from sending excitatory signal to cortex (9). As such, the āstart and stopā supported by these two pathways both initiates and ends movements as well as supports smooth, coordinated movement when functioning together appropriately. Dysfunctions in one or both of these pathways can lead to non-volitional and jerky movements and/or difficulty initiating movements (9, 11, 12). The final (known), more recently discovered pathway, the hyperdirect pathway, also ultimately inhibits the thalamus (and suppresses movement), though more quickly (5). It does so by bypassing the striatum and GPe with an excitatory projection directly to the STN which then follows the same progression as in the indirect pathway, ultimately inhibiting (or rather, not exciting) movement (5). In addition to the hyperdirect pathway, understanding of cortical-subcortical motor loops has also been expanded to incorporate connections with the cerebellum (13, 14) [see Quartarone et al. (10) and Milardi et al. (15) for review].
Such parallel yet interdependent networks yield means to compensate for local network pathology. Evidence for the compensation-yielding loops is shown through isolated lesions of pallidum and striatum in adults, which are not always associated with severe motor dysfunction (10, 16). This suggests that, although these pathways appear pivotal to movement, there are likely mechanisms within them that compensate for a degree of perturbation or irregularity. Thus, the inherently static measures of SC and FC have provided additional insight and support of prior modalities', such as neuron tracings, findings of MN configuration and function.
Motor Network Functional Connectivity and Age
For the purpose of this review, further mentions of functional connectivity (FC) refers to resting state functional connectivity unless otherwise specified. FC has revealed age-dependent basal ganglia (BG) and related motor phenotype differences (3, 17ā19). In a study of healthy 7ā18-year-olds the used independent component analysis (ICA), age was positively correlated with FC within multiple BG network components including: right postcentral cortex (primary somatosensory cortex) extending to right precuneus, left caudate and thalami, and the left olfactory region extending to left putamen and amygdala (19). In the same study, in the default mode network component, FC in the right pallidum and putamen were positively correlated with age (19). Additionally, in 18ā49 year-olds, FC between BG regions (e.g., between caudate head and body, between caudate body and putamen, between posterior putamen and pallidum) increased with age (3). Finally, in a study of 12ā71 year-olds, FC of BG was positively correlated with age (17). In contrast, in a study of 60ā82 year-olds, FC within bilateral caudate and putamen was negatively correlated with age (18). Together, this may suggest that BG FC primarily increases from age seven to middle adulthood and then decreases in the healthy aging elderly (17ā19).
In terms of connections from BG to other regions, a study in adults ages 18ā49 showed that FC of both the putamen and pallidum to areas of the default mode network (specifically ventromedial prefrontal cortex/posterior cingulate cortex) increased linearly with age while BG connectivity to regions in the ātask-positiveā (specifically somatomotor cortex) network decreased linearly with age (3). Thus, in this study, changes in FC from early to mid-adulthood are more varied between the BG and cortical regions (e.g., increased connectivity to regions such as ventromedial prefrontal cortex but decreased connectivity to somatomotor cortex) than between subcortical motor regions (primarily increased FC with age), indicating the subcortical and cortical motor structures have different age-dependent connectivity trajectories in adulthood (3). Overall, motor network FC across development does have age-related changes with primarily increased FC within deep gray structures with age (3, 17, 19), until old age, at which time it begins to decrease (18) and more variable changes in FC between deep gray and cortical networks through young to middle adulthood (3).
Motor Network Functional Connectivity and Motor Skill
In the healthy, MN FC is associated with motor skill and training. A recent study of trained young adult dancers showed that, compared to non-dancers, dancers had greater short-range functional connectivity density [FCD; a voxelwise data-driven metric that identifies local (short-range) and global (long-range) correlations; (20)] in bilateral sensorimotor cortex and increased long-range FCDs in bilateral putamen and right superior occipital gyrus (21). Dancers also had increased FC between the putamen and middle cingulate cortex (MCC) and enhanced functional integration, meaning increased correlational FC, of cortico-basal ganglia loops via the MCC. Specifically, this meant that when seeded FC was used (correlations from one specified region), the left putamen, right putamen, and left postcentral gyrus all had increased FC to MCC in dancers (21). Additionally, FCD in the sensorimotor cortex was positively correlated with the average time spent training in a week (21). This suggests that FC in these regions is related to the amount of time spent using motor programs and regions, which is relevant for clinical conditions that may affect those regions. A study investigating FC in musicians with and without musician's dystonia found that, FC within in the right putamen was increased overall in musicians with musician's dystonia compared to musicians without musician's dystonia (hyperconnectivity), and that this difference was greatest in the right anterior putamen (22). However, increased FC within the anterior right putamen was correlated with piano skill playing level in healthy controls (HC), but not those with musician's dystonia (22). Together, the results of these two studies suggest that the FC of the putamen is particularly important when it comes to motor skill building and that while increased putaminal FC supports skill building, ātoo muchā (hyperconnectivity) may be detrimental. Thus, MN FC is associated with and is modulated by MN-utilization skills and this appears to be distinguishable from disease-related FC.
In contrast with the MN FC increases associated with motor skill training of specific complex skills, in one study of healthy aging adults (60ā82 years old) no relationship between BG FC and motor skill was detected (18). Since this study was only in aging adults, it's not clear if this is the effect of age, the covariates used (e.g., Pegboard tasks in the aging study (18), as opposed to trained skill level, time spent training, disease, etc.), or a combination thereof. It is interesting to note that, in both an aging sample (18) and a sample with BG affecting disease (dystonia) (22), the degree of FC did not correlate with the respective motor skill measures for each study. Given the overall difference in the different connectivity patterns (i.e., overall, those with musician's dystonia showed increased FC in the right anterior putamen but aging was associated with decreased bilateral putaminal FC), this suggests that aging and onset of acquired disease (in this case, dystonia) may not have the same relationship with motor network FC changes and may be at two ends of the connectivity spectrum. However, it is important to note that methodological differences (e.g., ROI selection, analysis method) in these studies could have contributed to findings.
Motor Network Functional Connectivity in Clinical Populations
Neurodegenerative Disease
MN FC demonstrates disease differentiating and severity attributes. Compared to healthy aging controls (HC), patients with Parkinson's disease, a neurodegenerative disease characterized by nigro-striatal dopaminergic function loss (23), show reduced FC between striatum and the thalamus, midbrain, pons, and cerebellum, and a relative absence of anti-correlations between striatum and cortical regions including sensorimotor, visual and subgenual prefrontal areas (24). Parkinson's disease FC has also shown additional broader range reduced connectivity in the supplementary motor area (SMA), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and left putamen, and increased FC in the left primary motor cortex (M1), parietal cortex, and cerebellum compared to HC (25). Further, in Parkinson's disease, midbrain-cortical FC is associated with freezing of gait (26). These changes and associations appear largely specific to motor-related regions. This is important for potential clinical applications because this suggests FC is both sensitive to neurodegeneration and specifically spatially localizing instead of being associated with more generalized differences.
While the above studies demonstrate FC differences associated with a neurodegenerative disease with prominent motor symptoms (amongst other symptomology including some cognitive impairments) compared to typical aging, it is not clear from these studies if the FC differences seen are more specific to Parkinson's disease or are general to neurodegenerative disease. One way to investigate disease specificity is to compare to another disease with neurodegenerative pathology, such as Alzheimer's disease. While Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease are both neurodegenerative, they have largely differentiated neurodegenerative patterns across the brain. Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease is primarily cortical with some subcortical neurodegeneration (27) while Parkinson's disease neurodegeneration is largely within BG (23). As such, they provide an informative contrast when investigating functional brain networks. A recent meta-analysis and systematic review of FC in Alzheimer's disease found consistent differences (reduced FC) compared to typical aging in the default mode network, salience network and, to an extent, limbic networks (28). The authors note, however, that many studies restrict their investigation to specific networks (e.g., default mode), which calls into question whether differences in the DMN are truly larger than in other networks (28).
If FC is sensitive to and localizes disease process neurodegeneration, direct comparisons of atypical FC between Parkinson's and Alzheimer's patients should show, at least, spatial differences. This was demonstrated in a recent study comparing FC of BG in patients with Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and healthy controls (HC) (29). In this study, patients with Parkinson's disease specifically showed decreased BG FC (hypoconnectivity), compared to HC and Alzheimer's disease (29). Additionally, while another study showed that Parkinson's and Alzheimer's patients both had reduced striatal FC with other regions compared to controls, reduced FC between middle striatum and was negatively correlated with different cognitive deficit's in Parkinson's (executive functions) and Alzheimer's (memory performance) disease (30). Furthermore, Parkinson's, but not Alzheimer's patients with mild cognitive impairment had decreased FC between dorsal striatum and primary sensorimotor and visual regions (30). Taken together, FC differences have been noted between Parkinson's and Alzheimer's patients when within-region FC is investigated (29) and when between-region FC is investigated (30). Thus, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, while both neurodegenerative diseases, are differentiable by BG FC changes (29, 30).
Brain Insult (Early Life)
Differences in MN FC are not limited to neurodegenerative motor conditions. Perinatal brain insults associated with motor deficits have shown FC correlates. Neonatal prematurity showed association between thalamus-motor and BG-motor network connectivity and behavioral motor outcome scores (31). In a systematic review, neonatal diaschisis resulting in later outcomes of severe childhood motor impairments were associated with MN FC (32). Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that the presence and typicality of FC BG networks (identified from independent component analysis; ICA) in neonates during the acute period of brain injury predicted clinically noted developmental delay and motor-tone outcomes within 6 months (33). Finally, severity of motor deficits (chronic spastic quadriplegia) after anoxic brain injury from drowning have also been correlated with the āhealthā of motor rs-fMRI ICA networks in children and that this can be independent of cognitive function and cognitive networks (34). Together, studies of FC after brain injury, particularly anoxic brain injury, imply that motor deficits and movement disorders can be correlated with MN FC after brain insult.
Acquired Movement/Motor Disorders
FC differences have also been noted in patients with acquired movement disorders, such as focal dystonias. Dystonia is a movement disorder that is characterized by involuntary muscle contractions that lead to odd postures, repetitive movements, or both (35, 36). Focal dystonia refers to dystonias that are restricted to one part of the body (35). Examples include cervical dystonia [characterized by involuntary contractions of neck muscles, causing the head to turn to one side or tilt forward or backward; (37)] and blepharospasm [characterized by involuntary eye movements such as blinking and twitching; (38)]. FC has demonstrated differences between patients with focal dystonia and HC and that these differences can be specific to the type of focal dystonia. In cervical dystonia, patients were shown to have decreased FC between the primary and secondary sensory cortices compared to controls, but increased FC within the BG, between the BG and thalamus, and between the somatosensory and motor cortices (39). In contrast, patients with blepharospasm showed only widespread reduced FC, both regional (between neighboring cortical or cerebellar regions, but not within deep gray structures) and long-range (40).
Some acquired dystonias are task specific, meaning that they almost solely occur during a specific activity (35). Task specific dystonias are thought to be, in part, due to repetitive movement associated with an activity (35). For example, writer's cramp is a focal dystonia that involves the dominant hand (and sometimes arm) and musician's dystonia generally involves the hands or the mouth (embouchure dystonia) (35). Right-handed patients with writers' cramp show FC decreases in the left primary somatosensory area as well as between the left superior parietal lobule and left dorsal premotor hand area and FC increases in left putamen (41, 42). As stated above, FC within the right anterior putamen is increased in patients with musician's dystonia compared to HC (22). Additionally, patients with spasmodic dysphonia have been shown to have a mixture of increased and decreased FC between deep gray, cerebellar, and cortical regions thought to subserve language and articulation compared to controls and FC between left thalamus and left caudate was correlated with disease severity (43). Spasmodic dysphonia (also called laryngeal dystonia) is a voice disorder that causes involuntary spasms of the larynx (44). As such, the FC abnormalities in regions associated with articulation in patients with spasmodic dysphonia mentioned above may represent specificity for abnormal muscle movements of the larynx. Thus, FC abnormalities in task specific focal dystonia appear to show some differentiation between focal dystonia type, particularly in cortical locations associated with the affected body part. In contrast to Parkinson's disease (neurodegenerative) who generally show hypoconnectivity within BG regions, patients with focal dystonias appear to often have hyperconnectivity within BG regions. Thus, MN FC in neonatal, pediatric, and adult pathology is associated with motor impairments and adult MN pathologies of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease show FC-disease differentiating attributes and widespread network effects.
There is also evidence that abnormal regional FC contributes to disruption of global FC in dystonia (45). However, another study determined that, while patients with focal dystonia had decreased functional connectivity regionally (within the striatum and between lateral primary sensorimotor cortex and the ventral intraparietal area), whole-brain global FC measures did not distinguish dystonia from HC after motion correction using global signal regression (46). In summary, focal dystonia in adults also show FC differences compared to controls, these differences appear to be primarily hyper connective within deep gray structures and often, but not always, hypoconnective in the cerebral cortex.
Functional Connectivity and Treatment of Movement Disorders
There have been several recent advances in knowledge about the potential utility of FC in predicting the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease, in particular, including the development of specialized toolboxes that provide pipelines for processing and integrating neuroimaging data for DBS (47, 48). Using a combination of normative healthy adult data and data from adults with Parkinson's disease, Horn et al. (49) demonstrated that anti-correlated FC between the subthalamic nucleus (DBS lead target) lead location and primary motor cortex based on normative or referenced FC data is predictive of clinical improvement after STN-DBS implantation. Preoperative FC between STN and the ipsilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) has also been shown to be positively correlated with clinical improvement after STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease (50). In contrast, there is far less known about preoperative FC and DBS outcomes in patients with idiopathic generalized dystonia, however, a recent study positively correlated preoperative FC between lead site (GPi) and primary sensorimotor cortex, motor thalamus, and cerebellum (51). It should be noted that several of these connectivity studies also utilize structural connectivity (T2 diffusion imaging) although FC often independently predicts DBS outcomes (49, 51).
Finally, studies have also shown changes in FC to be associated with treatment for movement disorders. While this proves challenging for DBS (a pre-post FC design is technically difficult due to the challenges of MRI after DBS including both safety and susceptibility artifact introduced from DBS lead sites), there have been some observational studies investigating FC changes after treatment with botulinum toxin in focal (cervical) dystonia and blepharospasm (39, 40, 52ā54). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that brain network changes associated with clinical treatment in movement disorders can be, respectively, measured with FC. For a summary of FC findings discussed, (see Table 1).
Table 1
| Condition | Summary |
|---|---|
| Parkinson's disease | FC in Parkinson's commonly follows a pattern of hypoconnectivity, particularly in BG but also often between BG and other regions. Methodologies focusing on the BG differentiate FC differences in Parkinson's compared to Alzheimer's disease. Methodologies not primarily focusing on BG may also see FC reductions associated with cortical-midbrain connections. Pre-op FC between STN and GPi is positively correlated with STN-DBS improvement. Normative (non-patient) FC between superimposed lead locations and M1 (anticorrelation) and SMA, anterior cingulate, and PFC (positive correlation) are associated with STN-DBS outcomes. |
| Dystonia | FC in dystonia seems to follow a pattern of almost always hyperconnectivity within/between deep-gray regions and then a mixture of hyper and hypo connectivity between deep gray and cortical/cerebellar regions as well as a mixture of hypo and hyperconnectivity between motor, sensory, association, and cognitive regions. At times, this is variable by study method. Hypoconnectivity between BG and cortical regions may also vary by type of dystonia (e.g., area affected by dystonia). |
| Generalized idiopathic dystonia | In patients, preoperative FC between GPi-DBS lead locations and M1/S1, motor thalamus, and cerebellum are positively correlated with outcomes, while FC between GPi-DBS lead locations and SMA and premotor cortex are negatively associated with outcomes. |
| Cervical dystonia | Often increased FC in BG and between BG and thalamus compared to controls. Some studies show hypoconnective FC between BG/thalamus and M1/S1 regions. Whole-brain studies show mixtures of increased and decreased FC between cortical regions. FC with regions of the cerebellum, within BG, and between BG and thalamus, M1, and S1 are reduced with botox injections. Some atypical (compared to HC) cortical FC is made normal or more HC-like after botox injections. |
| Blepharospasm/ Orofacial dystonia | Widespread reduced FC between caudate/putamen and cortical regions, as well as between cerebellar regions and between cerebellar and motor and visual regions compared to HC. After botox, widespread reduced FC including between BG and cerebellum, between BG structures, between cerebellar and visual and premotor (including frontal eye field) regions, between thalamus and premotor/SMA regions. Additionally, botox is associated with FC increases between cerebellum and associative visual cortex. |
| Writer's cramp | Increased BC FC (left putamen) and decreased FC within S1 and between motor hand area and superior parietal lobule. Additionally, FC in the intraparietal sulcus (associated with coordination of hand-eye movement) has been negatively corelated with disease duration and FC in parts of the superior parietal lobule associated with somatosensory guidance of movement were positively correlated with disease severity (Less FC with greater severity). |
| Musician's dystonia | Increased BG FC (right anterior putamen), these increases were not correlated with skill. |
| Spasmodic dysphonia | Increased FC between thalamus and BG as well as FC increases between many (cortical) sensorimotor, auditory, and cerebellar locations. Reduced FC between insula and semantic processing regions and well are between thalamus and motor (speech) regions. Connectivity between thalamus and caudate was positively associated with clinical severity. |
| Brain insult (perinatal-4 years) | Reduction of FC networks can be widespread and associated with motor outcomes, especially motor, sensory, BG, and cerebellar networks. Additionally, increased intra-hemispheric, decreased interhemispheric, and impaired lateralization of FC is associated with motor outcomes. However, very preterm infants had less association between BG networks and motor function scores and BG/thalamic networks were associated with posture). |
Summary of functional connectivity findings reviewed by disease.
BG, basal ganglia; DBS, deep brain stimulation, FC, functional connectivity; GPi, globus pallidus internus; HC, healthy controls; M1, primary motor cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; Pre-op, preoperative; S1, primary somatosensory cortex; SMA, supplemental motor cortex; STN, subthalamic nucleus.
Advancements Through Effective Connectivity
FC demonstrates the potential of rs-fMRI signal to capture MN relevant characterizations both within and between regions of the brain and changes associated with age, ability, disease, and treatment. Although FC has revealed MN location and connectivity changes with age and disease, a different rs-fMRI connectivity approach, effective connectivity (EC), may be uniquely informative for clinically relevant dynamic MN-informed characterizations. EC is the causal influence that one node in a network (in this case, a neural system such as a brain region) over another (55) and generally is grounded in dynamic systems theory (56). Importantly, EC allows the user to not only infer functional connectivity between two regions (a descriptive relationship), but the direction of influence. That is, EC methods interrogate causal relationships of activation between brain regions (nodes) in order to find a reliable model for how data were caused specifically by addressing the temporal dynamics of the system [for wider review, see (55, 56)]. Given the complex neural circuitry involved in movement (such as the counterbalance of the direct and indirect pathways), this may prove beneficial for understanding not only why regions appear hyper- or hypo- connected but also the mechanistic changes of treatments.
Perhaps the most prevalent EC method using fMRI data is dynamic causal modeling [DCM - (57)]. DCM uses Bayesian model (comparison) framework to identify the model with the highest level of evidence. While there are multiple types of DCMs, in general, they specify a biophysically informed generative model including priors and use differential equations to describe hidden neuronal and physiological states based on observed data. This model space necessarily includes endogenous connections between nodes and may also include exogenous influences on nodes and/or connections (edges). In practice, at least two potential models are specified, inverted, and then their evidence is compared to determine which most likely explains the data. Methodologically, DCM in rs-fMRI, most performed using cross-spectral DCM (58) but also performed with stochastic DCM (59), is new compared to task-based (deterministic time series) fMRI DCM methods. In addition to DCM, common EC methods used include Granger causality analysis [GCA; (60, 61)] and Structural Equation Modeling [SEM; (7)]. In GCA, linear vector autoregressive models are fit to time-series data and compared per connection, often using likelihood ratio tests, using concepts of Granger causality. A more recent development of GCA is Granger causality mapping (GCM) which benefits from not requiring a priori specification of a model, thus allowing the user to take a more exploratory approach to identifying all EC for a given location (61, 62). SEM in functional neuroimaging makes inferences based on co-variances of neural activity among disparate regions within neuroanatomically-based models using a path analysis framework (63).
An important aside on EC methods: active task-based EC (active-EC) requires patient cooperation, whereas passive task-based EC (passive-EC) and purely resting state EC (rs-EC) have little to no patient cooperation demand, respectively, which has age-capacity success implications. For this review, active-EC refers to EC inferred from a volitional task requiring participation (e.g., finger tapping), passive-EC refers to EC inferred āepochā-based periods during a scanning session but the difference during this period is not volitional on the part of the participant and they are instructed to be in a resting state (e.g., tremor-onset, activation of DBS). As studies of MN related rs-EC (or passive-EC) are relatively limited compared to FC, these sections will also review passive and active-EC studies.
Motor Network Effective Connectivity in Healthy Adults
Healthy adults' active-EC is predictive of immediate future motor performance and downstream signaling network paradigms. For example, during adult response inhibition active-EC increases from the GPi to the thalamus, predicting both increased response inhibition and downstream active-EC from pre-SMA to right caudate (64). Such immediate behavioral and MN prediction capacity could hypothetically inform adjustment to deep brain stimulator (DBS) neuromodulation settings in disease. Also, this dynamic active-EC signaling paradigm is consistent with the indirect and hyperdirect model of BG signaling inhibition (64). These active-EC measures also correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score and the finding that use of levodopa normalizes atypical FC patterns (64). Taken together, this suggests that active-EC measures have pathophysiologic meaning and could hypothetically accelerate DBS motor related improvements via informed stimulation parameter adjustments.
Active-EC in MN is also affected by implicit motor-sequence learning (finger tapping sequence) and shows different effects at the encoding stage [initial learning; (65, 66)] and after memory consolidation [repeating the task after sleeping; (66)]. Specifically, encoding has been associated with inhibitory effects from each M1 to the contralateral cerebellum (65) and inhibitory modulation from left M1 to right cerebellum, right premotor cortex to left cerebellum, and putamen to cerebellum bilaterally (66). In contrast, performance after memory consolidation was only associated with inhibition from left cerebellum to right putamen (66). Together, these studies suggest that both initial and more long-term stages of implicit, procedural, motor memory are associated with active-EC changes. This, again, has potential implications for identifying and guiding changes in treatments related to movements.
Motor Network Effective Connectivity in Clinical Populations
Altered active-EC and passive-EC in adult BG circuitry has also been observed in movement disorders including Parkinson's disease passive-EC (67ā69), and active-EC (68, 70) and focal dystonia active-EC (71, 72) (see Table 2 for summary of findings highlighted). For example, adults with writer's cramp dystonia compared to HC showed a mixture of abnormal excitatory and inhibitory active-EC within connections between motor cortex and the cerebellum, as well as BG, during a finger tapping task with the non-dominant hand (72). In a passive visual task, patients with cervical dystonia compared to HC showed greater āfeedbackā excitatory influence from bilateral striatum to the superior colliculus, a major hub for integrating sensory information (71). Thus, active-EC was able to localize the atypical connections during both active and passive tasks in patients with movement disorders. Additionally, in a study designed to identify whether DCM (active-EC) findings were reproducible in HC and if effects of Parkinson's disease and dopamine therapy were identifiable, Rowe et al. (70) found that a winning model was the same across two task sessions for HCs and also for medicated patients with Parkinson's, but the winning model was different for un-medicated Parkinson's patients. The authors state that winning model selection (circuit/model architecture) may be reliable enough to differentiate clinical populations, but do caution against relying on comparisons of parameter estimates (connection strengths) between groups (70). In addition to onset of actions, EC has been shown vary with symptoms. In a recent study by Dirkx et al. (69) in patients with Parkinson's, changes in Parkinsonian tremor amplitude (measured with EMG simultaneous to fMRI) were identified to have originated in the GPi which then drove changes throughout the cerebello-thalamo-cortico loop via first a GPi ā M1 connection. Taken together, onset-based EC appears promising for identifying both onset of actions and symptoms.
Table 2
| Condition | Summary |
|---|---|
| Parkinson's disease | In passive-EC: DCM reliably differentiates HC from unmedicated Parkinson's patients (active-EC; 68). Passive-EC reliably identifies changes in BG directed connectivity from STN-DBS, including decreased strength of all connections to and from STN, and increased strength in connections in the direct pathway. The strength of connections in the direct and hyperdirect pathways are negatively correlated with clinical impairment and the degree of change in these pathways from STN-DBS is correlated with clinical efficacy of STN-DBS (67, 68). Additionally, the pathways modulated by STN-DBS are different at rest (hyperdirect and indirect) vs. during an active task (direct, indirect, hyperdirect, and CER ā BG, M1 and CER self-connections) (68). Using passive-EC (STN-DBS stimulation): M1 and CER have bidirectional connectivity, but CER does not have EC connections with BG/thalamus (68). Using passive-EC (changes in tremor amplitude): Changes in tremor amplitude (simultaneous EMG-fMRI) are driven by GPi, these changes are propagated by a GPi ā M1 connection through the cerebello-thalamo-cortico circuit and are not driven by an STN ā CER connection (69). |
| Essential tremor | Using rs-EC pre and post thalamotomy: Transient increased self-inhibition of VL-thal, sustained effects of decreased excitation for SMA ā DN, VL-thal ā DN all compared to baseline. Additionally, increased Thal ā DN excitation and reduced SMA ā DN and VL-thal ā DN excitation are associated with better posture scores, while only decreased SMA ā DN is associated with better clinical motor action scores. In sum, transient changes are in the VL-thal self-connection, but sustained changes are in connections to DN. SMA ā DN appears particularly important as it is also associated with clinical scores (73). |
| Dystonia | |
| Cervical dystonia | Using passive-EC (passive loom-recede visual stimulus): CD has greater Striatum ā SC feedback connectivity than HC for looming stimulus, group differences were only seen when using a model that included āfeedbackā connections. (SC ā striatum ā thalamus ā SC) (71). |
| Writer's cramp | Using active-EC during finger tapping task, WC show more excitation bidirectionally between M1 and CER and more inhibition from M1 ā Put and Put ā GPi. WC show less excitation bidirectionally between M1 and SMA, and between CER and Put; WC also show less GPi ā M1 inhibition during task. This shows abnormalities in intracortical connections (hypo-excited), cortico-basal ganglia circuitry (both hyper and hypo excited), and cortico-cerebellar circuitry (hyper-excited) (72). |
| Spasmodic dysphonia | Using rs-EC: SD patients show stronger L IPC ā L Putamen and stronger R to L PMC connections. SD with voice tremor also had stronger self-inhibition at locations compared to SD without voice tremor (74). |
Summary of highlights of effective connectivity findings reviewed by disease.
CER, cerebellum; CD, cervical dystonia; DBS, deep brain stimulation DCM, dynamic causal modeling; DN, dentate nucleus (cerebellum); EC, effective connectivity; EMG, electromyography; HC, Healthy Control; GP, globus pallidus; GPi, globus pallidus internus; M1, primary motor cortex; PMC, premotor cortex; SC, superior colliculus; SD, spasmodic dysphonia; SMA, supplementary motor area; STN, subthalamic nucleus; Thal, thalamus; VL-thal, ventrolateral thalamic nucleus; WC, Writer's cramp.
Differences in EC have also been noted with rs-EC. In adults with spasmodic dysphonia, both top-down (parieto-putaminal) and interhemispheric (right-to-left pre-motor) rs-EC is hyperexcitable and patients with and without tremor can be further differentiated by the fact that patients with tremor additionally show less self-inhibition for the left parietal cortex, left putamen, and right premotor cortex (74). Thus, rs-EC was able to localize atypical directional connectivity in focal dystonia as well as differentiate sub-groups of similar patient groups.
Importantly, passive-EC and rs-EC have demonstrated potential for localizing and characterizing pathological dynamic network signal on an individual basis to guide effective surgical therapies in adults, such as the positioning of modulatory intracerebral leads or ablations (67, 73). Such proof of concept is exemplified in Parkinson's disease, where passive-EC by dynamic causal modeling (DCM) has been used to model the effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS on BG circuitry, and changes of directional modulation induced with āonā STN-DBS are associated with clinical efficacy of DBS (67). Specifically, they found that the endogenous strength of the connections within the direct (putamen ā thalamus) and hyperdirect pathways (M1 ā STN) were negatively correlated with clinical impairment and modulation of these pathways from STN-DBS was positively correlated with clinical improvement from STN-DBS. Additionally, the strength of the connection putamen ā STN was positively correlated with clinical impairment. Importantly, the primary modulatory effects of STN-DBS were reproduced in subsequent study using the same paradigm in a different cohort of patients (68). Reproducing these effects, although at the same institution and with the same group, speaks to a strength of this paradigm and also highlights the importance of considering methodological differences when results to different studies seem paradoxical. This is of particular importance when considering clinical groups and the potential to inform biomarkers/diagnosis and treatment.
One additional advantage of passive-EC and rs-EC paradigms for investigating the effects of DBS is that directional computational modeling techniques, such as DCM, can model āhiddenā nodes in a network. This is beneficial because, post DBS implant, an MRI susceptibility artifact will occur at lead locations, thus making it not possible to measure the BOLD response at lead location. However, as techniques such as DCM are able to model lead-inferred location activity (LILA) within a network of regions by placing a āhiddenā node at the lead location, it can use rs-fMRI to infer the effect of DBS on brain-network dynamics (59, 67, 68, 75). Crucially, while using this technique (67, 68) identified several changes centering around the āhiddenā STN node, suggesting that it correctly identified STN as a location pivotal to clinical changes despite having not directly measured the STN. Similarly, rs-EC in essential tremor, pre and post-thalamotomy, also predicts post-operative dynamic MN changes and clinical motor-symptom scores without the use of āhidden nodes,ā and some clinical correlations included regions affected by surgery (73). This suggests that rs-EC also characterizes casual network dynamics with high enough integrity to guide surgical strategy and is associated with clinical outcomes in adults with essential tremor. Specifically, rs-EC allows for the identification of regions that are functionally connected, as well as the direction and nature of those connections. Certain techniques also allow for LILA, opening possibilities for inferring neural activity at lead sites and identifying causal network dynamic changes (not restricted to lead sites) as a function of DBS. As such, rs-EC may lead to higher specificity and precision in identifying underlying network neuropathology.
Limitations
While rs-EC (and passive-EC) is a promising method for investigating and developing clinically relevant and actionable biomarkers, it is important to note the limitations and methodological considerations. fMRI itself faces limitations. A recent paper called into question the ability for fMRI techniques and analyses to adequately control for false-positives, reporting a potential false positive rate of up to 70% for clusterwise inferences if inadequate corrections are performed (76). This is particularly relevant if whole-brain activation analysis is used to identify potential regions of interest for model nodes in EC and for FC whole-brain analyses. Care must be taken to use appropriate analysis methods and multiple comparisons corrections in whole-brain analyses (particularly those that use familywise error) when using activation-based ROIs. Additionally, it is critical to note the importance of adequately denoising rs-fMRI data, especially in the context of movement (46, 77, 78). Movement is a prevalent source of noise in rs-fMRI and the risk of movement is generally higher in children and clinical populations. Finally, in terms of methodological considerations, it is important to note that reproducibility of findings can be influenced by differences in data-acquisition, pre-processing, analysis paradigm, ROI selection, and more.
Conclusion
Functional connectivity builds upon the work established by structural modalities in characterizing MN configuration, is associated with lifespan MN related changes, has pathology-localizing potential, has potential to localize FC related changes after medical treatments including medications and botulinum injection, and relates to motor behavior in health and disease across neonatal to adult age groups. However, effective connectivity may prove to be particularly useful in brain-invasive (DBS) MN-informed therapies due to its potential to demonstrate lead-inferred location activity, especially as DBS systems have begun to be compatible with 3T MRI. Passive-EC and rs-EC potential may hold promise in childhood movement disorder therapies, given the lower to no patient demand during a resting state fMRI scan.
Impact Statement
While functional connectivity has elucidated much MN properties with relation to age, disease, and behavior, effective connectivity has been shown to be useful in MN-informed therapies in adults. Thus, effective connectivity may have potential to impact childhood movement disorder therapies, given the lower to no patient demand.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
BS, SW, VB, and MK: drafting the work. BS, VB, MK, SW, AW, JH, MG, and PDA: conception and design of article, revising for intellectual content, final approval of version to be published, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
Article previously published in preprint server. This article was published as a preprint to 2021120119 as https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202112.0119.v1.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
RanganathanRLeeMH. Newell KM. Repetition without repetition: challenges in understanding behavioral flexibility in motor skill. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:2018. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02018
2.
BarnesKCohenAPowerJNelsonSDosenbachYMiezinFet al. Identifying basal ganglia divisions in individuals using resting-state functional connectivity MRI. Front Syst Neurosci. (2010) 4:18. 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00018
3.
ManzaPZhangSHuSChaoHHLeungHCLiCR. The effects of age on resting state functional connectivity of the basal ganglia from young to middle adulthood. Neuroimage. (2015) 107:311ā22. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.016
4.
HaberSN. The primate basal ganglia: parallel and integrative networks. J Chem Neuroanat. (2003) 26:317ā30. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2003.10.003
5.
NambuATokunoHTakadaM. Functional significance of the corticoāsubthalamoāpallidal āhyperdirectā pathway. Neurosci Res. (2002) 43:111ā7. 10.1016/S.0168-0102(02)00027-5
6.
RobinsonSBassoGSoldatiNSailerUJovicichJBruzzoneLet al. A resting state network in the motor control circuit of the basal ganglia. BMC Neurosci. (2009) 10:137. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-137
7.
CacciolaAMilardiDBertinoSBasileGACalamuneriAChillemiGet al. Structural connectivity-based topography of the human globus pallidus: Implications for therapeutic targeting in movement disorders. Mov Disord. (2019) 34:987ā96. 10.1002/mds.27712
8.
AlexanderGEDelongMRStrickPL. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci. (1986) 9:357ā81. 10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041
9.
AlbinRLYoungABPenneyJB. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. (1989) 12:366ā75. 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90074-X
10.
QuartaroneACacciolaAMilardiDGhilardiMFCalamuneriAChillemiGet al. New insights into cortico-basal-cerebellar connectome: clinical and physiological considerations. Brain. (2019) 143:396ā406. 10.1093/brain/awz310
11.
SimonyanKChoHHamzehei SichaniARubien-ThomasEHallettM. The direct basal ganglia pathway is hyperfunctional in focal dystonia. Brain. (2017) 140:3179ā90. 10.1093/brain/awx263
12.
FujitaKEidelbergD. Imbalance of the direct and indirect pathways in focal dystonia: a balanced view. Brain. (2017) 140:3075ā7. 10.1093/brain/awx305
13.
BostanACDumRPStrickPL. The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:8452ā6. 10.1073/pnas.1000496107
14.
BostanACStrickPL. The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2018) 19:338ā50. 10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7
15.
MilardiDQuartaroneABramantiAAnastasiGBertinoSBasileGAet al. The cortico-basal ganglia-cerebellar network: past, present and future perspectives. Front Syst Neurosci. (2019) 13:61. 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00061
16.
BhatiaKPMarsdenCD. The behavioural and motor consequences of focal lesions of the basal ganglia in man. Brain. (1994) 117:859ā76. 10.1093/brain/117.4.859
17.
AllenEAErhardtEBDamarajuEGrunerWSegallJMSilvaRFet al. A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting-state networks. Front Syst Neurosci. (2011) 5:2. 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00002
18.
GriffantiLStratmannPRolinskiMFilippiniNZsoldosEMahmoodAet al. Exploring variability in basal ganglia connectivity with functional MRI in healthy aging. Brain Imaging Behav. (2018) 12:1822ā7. 10.1007/s11682-018-9824-1
19.
SolĆ©-PadullĆ©sCCastro-FornielesJDe La SernaECalvoRBaezaIMoyaJet al. Intrinsic connectivity networks from childhood to late adolescence: effects of age and sex. Dev Cogn Neurosci. (2016) 17:35ā44. 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.004
20.
TomasiDVolkowND. Functional connectivity density mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:9885ā90. 10.1073/pnas.1001414107
21.
LiGHeHHuangMZhangXLuJLaiYet al. Identifying enhanced cortico-basal ganglia loops associated with prolonged dance training. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:10271. 10.1038/srep10271
22.
KitaKRokickiJFuruyaSSakamotoTHanakawaT. Resting-state basal ganglia network codes a motor musical skill and its disruption From dystonia. Mov Disord. (2018) 33:1472ā80. 10.1002/mds.27448
23.
DauerWPrzedborskiS. Parkinson's disease: mechanisms and models. Neuron. (2003) 39:889ā909. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00568-3
24.
HackerCDPerlmutterJSCriswellSRAncesBMSnyderAZ. Resting state functional connectivity of the striatum in Parkinson's disease. Brain. (2012) 135:3699ā711. 10.1093/brain/aws281
25.
WuTWangLChenYZhaoCLiKChanP. Changes of functional connectivity of the motor network in the resting state in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. (2009) 460:6ā10. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.046
26.
DrobyAPelosinEPutzoluMBommaritoGMarcheseRMazzellaLet al. A multimodal imaging approach demonstrates reduced midbrain functional network connectivity is associated with freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. Front Neurol. (2021) 12:583593. 10.3389/fneur.2021.583593
27.
IkonomovicMDKlunkWEAbrahamsonEEMathisCAPriceJCTsopelasNDet al. Post-mortem correlates of in vivo PiB-PET amyloid imaging in a typical case of Alzheimer's disease. Brain. (2008) 131:1630ā45. 10.1093/brain/awn016
28.
BadhwarATamADansereauCOrbanPHoffstaedterFBellecP. Resting-state network dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. (2017) 8:73ā85. 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.03.007
29.
RolinskiMGriffantiLSzewczyk-KrolikowskiKMenkeRALWilcockGKFilippiniNet al. Aberrant functional connectivity within the basal ganglia of patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage Clin. (2015) 8:126ā32. 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.003
30.
AnderkovaLBartonMRektorovaI. Striato-cortical connections in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases: relation to cognition. Mov Disord. (2017) 32:917ā22. 10.1002/mds.26956
31.
WheelockMDAustinNCBoraSEggebrechtATMelzerTRWoodwardLJet al. Altered functional network connectivity relates to motor development in children born very preterm. Neuroimage. (2018) 183:574ā83. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.051
32.
NĆ BhroinMMolloyEJBokdeALW. Relationship between resting-state fMRI functional connectivity with motor and language outcome after perinatal brain injury ā A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2021) 33:36ā49. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.05.007
33.
BoerwinkleVLSussmanBLManjĆ³nIMireaLSulemanSWyckoffSNet al. Association of network connectivity via resting state functional MRI with consciousness, mortality, and outcomes in neonatal acute brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. (2022) 34:102962. 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102962
34.
IshaqueMManningJHWoolseyMDFranklinCGTullisEWBeckmannCFet al. Functional integrity in children with anoxic brain injury from drowning. Hum Brain Mapp. (2017) 38:4813ā31. 10.1002/hbm.23745
35.
AlbaneseABhatiaKBressmanSBDelongMRFahnSFungVSet al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. (2013) 28:863ā73. 10.1002/mds.25475
36.
FahnS. The varied clinical expressions of dystonia. Neurol Clin. (1984) 2:541ā54. 10.1016/S0733-8619(18)31090-9
37.
FahnSMarsdenCDCalneDB. (1987) Classification investigation of dystonia. In: MARSDENCDFAHNS. (eds.) Movement Disorders. London: Butterworths.
38.
MarsdenCD. The problem of adult-onset idiopathic torsion dystonia and other isolated dyskinesias in adult life (including blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, dystonic writer's cramp, and torticollis, or axial dystonia). Adv Neurol. (1976) 14:259ā76.
39.
BrodoehlSWagnerFPrellTKlingnerCWitteOWGuntherA. Cause or effect: altered brain and network activity in cervical dystonia is partially normalized by botulinum toxin treatment. Neuroimage Clin. (2019) 22:101792. 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101792
40.
JochimALiYGora-StahlbergGMantelTBerndtMCastropFet al. Altered functional connectivity in blepharospasm/orofacial dystonia. Brain Behav. (2017) 8:e00894. 10.1002/brb3.894
41.
MohammadiBKolleweKSamiiABeckmannCFDenglerRMĆ¼nteTF. Changes in resting-state brain networks in writer's cramp. Hum Brain Mapp. (2012) 33:840ā8. 10.1002/hbm.21250
42.
DelnoozCCSHelmichRCToniIVan De WarrenburgBP. Reduced parietal connectivity with a premotor writing area in writer's cramp. Mov Disord. (2012) 27:1425ā31. 10.1002/mds.25029
43.
KiyunaAKiseNHiratsukaMKondoSUeharaTMaedaHet al. Brain activity in patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Voice.31:379.e1-379.e11. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.018
44.
LudlowCL. Spasmodic dysphonia: a laryngeal control disorder specific to speech. J Neurosci. (2011) 31:793ā7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2758-10.2011
45.
BattistellaGTermsarasabPRamdhaniRAFuertingerSSimonyanK. Isolated focal dystonia as a disorder of large-scale functional networks. Cereb Cortex. (2017) 27:1203ā15. 10.1093/cercor/bhv313
46.
NorrisSAMorrisAECampbellMCKarimiMAdeyemoBPanielloRCet al. Regional, not global, functional connectivity contributes to isolated focal dystonia. Neurology. (2020) 95:e2246āe2258. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010791
47.
HornAKĆ¼hnAA. Lead-DBS: a toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations. Neuroimage. (2015) 107:127ā35. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.002
48.
HornALiNDembekTAKappelABoulayCEwertSet al. Lead-DBS v2: towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging. Neuroimage. (2019) 184:293ā316. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.068
49.
HornAReichMVorwerkJLiNWenzelGFangQet al. Connectivity predicts deep brain stimulation outcome in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. (2017) 82:67ā78. 10.1002/ana.24974
50.
YounceJRCampbellMCHersheyTTanenbaumABMilchenkoMUsheMet al. Resting-state functional connectivity predicts STN DBS clinical response. Mov Disord. (2021) 36:662ā71. 10.1002/mds.28376
51.
OkromelidzeLTsuboiTEisingerRSBurnsMRCharbelMRanaMet al. Functional and structural connectivity patterns associated with clinical outcomes in deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus for generalized dystonia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2020) 41:508ā514. 10.3174/ajnr.A6429
52.
DelnoozCCSPasmanJWBeckmannCFVan De WarrenburgBPC. Task-free functional MRI in cervical dystonia reveals multi-network changes that partially normalize with botulinum toxin. PloS ONE. (2013) 8:e62877. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062877
53.
FengLYinDWangXXuYXiangYTengFet al. Brain connectivity abnormalities and treatment-induced restorations in patients with cervical dystonia. Eur J Neurol. (2021) 28:1537ā47. 10.1111/ene.14695
54.
HokPHvizdoÅ”ovĆ”LOtrubaPKaiserovĆ”MTrneÄkovĆ”MTĆ¼dƶsZet al. Botulinum toxin injection changes resting state cerebellar connectivity in cervical dystonia. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:8322. 10.1038/s41598-021-87088-z
55.
FristonKJ. Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. (2011) 1:13ā36. 10.1089/brain.2011.0008
56.
StephanKEFristonKJ. Analyzing effective connectivity with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. (2010) 1:446ā59. 10.1002/wcs.58
57.
FristonKJHarrisonLPennyWD. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage. (2003) 19:1273ā302. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
58.
FristonKJKahanJBiswalBRaziA. A DCM for resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. (2014) 94:396ā407. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.009
59.
DaunizeauJFristonKJKiebelSJ. Variational Bayesian identification and prediction of stochastic nonlinear dynamic causal models. Physica D. (2009) 238:2089ā118. 10.1016/j.physd.2009.08.002
60.
GrangerCWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. (1969) 37:424ā38. 10.2307/1912791
61.
SethAKBarrettABBarnettL. Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. J Neurosci. (2015) 35:3293ā7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4399-14.2015
62.
RoebroeckAFormisanoEGoebelR. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage. (2005) 25:230ā42. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017
63.
MclntoshARGonzalez-LimaF. Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. (1994) 2:2ā22. 10.1002/hbm.460020104
64.
JahfariSWaldorpLVan Den WildenbergWPMScholteHSRidderinkhofKRForstmannBU. Effective connectivity reveals important roles for both the hyperdirect (Fronto-Subthalamic) and the indirect (Fronto-Striatal-Pallidal) fronto-basal ganglia pathways during response inhibition. J Neurosci. (2011) 31:6891ā9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5253-10.2011
65.
TzviEMĆ¼nteTFKrƤmerUM. Delineating the cortico-striatal-cerebellar network in implicit motor sequence learning. NeuroImage. (2014) 94:222ā30. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.004
66.
TzviEStoldtAWittKKrƤmerUM. Striatalācerebellar networks mediate consolidation in a motor sequence learning task: an fMRI study using dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage. (2015) 122:52ā64. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.077
67.
KahanJUrnerMMoranRFlandinGMarreirosAManciniLet al. Resting state functional MRI in Parkinson's disease: the impact of deep brain stimulation on āeffectiveā connectivity. Brain. (2014) 137:1130ā44. 10.1093/brain/awu027
68.
KahanJManciniLFlandinGWhiteMPapadakiAThorntonJet al. Deep brain stimulation has state-dependent effects on motor connectivity in Parkinson's disease. Brain. (2019) 142:2417ā31. 10.1093/brain/awz164
69.
DirkxMFDen OudenHAartsETimmerMBloemBRToniIet al. The cerebral network of Parkinson's tremor: an effective connectivity fMRI study. J Neurosci. (2016) 36:5362ā72. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3634-15.2016
70.
RoweJBHughesLEBarkerRAOwenAM. Dynamic causal modelling of effective connectivity from fMRI: are results reproducible and sensitive to Parkinson's disease and its treatment?NeuroImage. (2010) 52:1015ā26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.080
71.
DugganONarasimhamSGovernEMKillianOO'riordanSHutchinsonMet al. A study of the midbrain network for covert attentional orienting in cervical dystonia patients using dynamic causal modelling. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. (2019). 3519ā22. 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857152
72.
RothkirchIGranertOKnutzenAWolffSGƶvertFPedersenAet al. Dynamic causal modeling revealed dysfunctional effective connectivity in both, the cortico-basal-ganglia and the cerebello-cortical motor network in writers' cramp. Neuroimage Clin. (2018) 18:149ā59. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.015
73.
ParkHJPaeCFristonKJJangCRaziAZeidmanPet al. Hierarchical dynamic causal modeling of resting-state fMRI reveals longitudinal changes in effective connectivity in the motor system after thalamotomy for essential tremor. Front Neurol. (2017) 8:346. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00346
74.
BattistellaGSimonyanK. Top-down alteration of functional connectivity within the sensorimotor network in focal dystonia. Neurology. (2019) 92:e1843āe1851. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007317
75.
DaunizeauJStephanKEFristonKJ. Stochastic dynamic causal modelling of fMRI data: should we care about neural noise?Neuroimage. (2012) 62:464ā81. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.061
76.
EklundANicholsTEKnutssonH. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:7900ā5. 10.1073/pnas.1602413113
77.
ParkesLFulcherBYĆ¼celMFornitoA. An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI. Neuroimage. (2018) 171:415ā36. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.073
78.
PowerJDSchlaggarBLPetersenSE. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. (2015) 105:536ā51. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044
Summary
Keywords
resting state functional MRI, effective connectivity, dystonia, movement disorders, subcortical, basal ganglia
Citation
Sussman BL, Wyckoff SN, Heim J, Wilfong AA, Adelson PD, Kruer MC, Gonzalez MJ and Boerwinkle VL (2022) Is Resting State Functional MRI Effective Connectivity in Movement Disorders Helpful? A Focused Review Across Lifespan and Disease. Front. Neurol. 13:847834. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.847834
Received
03 January 2022
Accepted
23 March 2022
Published
14 April 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Ji Hyun Ko, University of Manitoba, Canada
Reviewed by
Iman Beheshti, University of Manitoba, Canada; Alexandru Hanganu, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de GƩriatrie de MontrƩal (CRIUGM), Canada
Updates
Copyright
Ā© 2022 Sussman, Wyckoff, Heim, Wilfong, Adelson, Kruer, Gonzalez and Boerwinkle.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bethany L. Sussman bsussman@phoenixchildrens.com
This article was submitted to Movement Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.