Impact Factor 4.137 | CiteScore 4.28
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Oncol., 15 October 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01075

Skeletal Muscle Depletion Predicts the Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy

Joongyo Lee, Yeona Cho, Sangjoon Park, Jun Won Kim and Ik Jae Lee*
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Background: Sarcopenia is gaining attention as a poor prognostic factor for various types of malignancies. This study evaluated the prevalence and prognostic significance of sarcopenia and its association with survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) to the primary site.

Materials and Methods: Between January 2009 and November 2016, 156 patients with HCC that underwent RT to the liver were retrospectively studied. Sarcopenia was defined as an L3 skeletal muscle index of <49 cm2/m2 for men and <41 cm2/m2 for women as proposed by Korean-specific cut-off value. Sarcopenia was identified pre- and post-RT (within 3 months from the end of RT).

Results: Pre-RT sarcopenia occurred in 99 (63.5%) patients and was significantly associated with higher levels of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), lower percentage of overweight/obesity (body-mass index), higher percentage of previous systemic chemotherapy, and lower total RT dose. At a median follow-up of 9.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in patients with pre-RT sarcopenia than in those without (7.1 vs. 15.3 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis [reporting hazard ratio (HR): 95% confidence interval (CI)], albumin-bilirubin score (2.35: 1.33–4.17; p = 0.003), total dose (0.44: 0.27–0.71; p = 0.001), and pre-RT sarcopenia (2.38: 1.53–3.70; p < 0.001) were independent OS prognostic factors. Among patients without pre-RT sarcopenia, 20 newly developed sarcopenia after RT and showed significantly lower OS compared to those without sarcopenia after RT (n = 35) (median 14.1 vs. 17.5 months, p = 0.018). Multivariate logistic regression analysis [reporting odds ratio (OR)] demonstrated older age (310.190; p = 0.007), Child-Pugh classification B or C (15.239; p = 0.047), higher alpha-fetoprotein (128.486; p = 0.008), higher PIVKA-II (118.536; p = 0.027), and larger planning target volume (51.310; p = 0.026) as significant factors for newly developed post-RT sarcopenia.

Conclusion: Newly developed sarcopenia after RT, as well as pre-RT sarcopenia, were associated with poor survival for HCC patients who underwent RT to the liver. This result suggests the possibility that early intervention such as nutritional support and exercise therapies before and during RT could prevent muscle wasting and may be effective in improving the prognosis of HCC patients.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies with poor prognosis, and the incidence of HCC has been steadily rising (1). With the progress in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC, local treatment such as resection, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), transcatheter arterial chemotherapy infusion (TACI), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) became the standard treatment, resulting in great improvement in survival and disease control. In addition, conventional radiotherapy (RT) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT) achieved substantial tumor regression and survival as reported in various studies (25). Despite the development of various treatment strategies, the prognosis of HCC is still poor, and several studies are underway to find the prognostic factors to improve outcome.

Poor general condition, low hepatic functional reserve, and protein energy malnutrition causing impaired immunity and dysregulated metabolism lead to poor long-term prognosis of HCC (6, 7). The concept of cachexia has been commonly used to describe the general condition of such cancer patients. The agreed diagnostic criterion for cachexia was weight loss >5%, or weight loss >2% in individuals already showing depletion according to current bodyweight and height [body-mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2] or skeletal muscle mass (8). However, cachexia can sometimes be misdiagnosed because the assessment of weight change depends on patient's response during a physical examination (9). Furthermore, changes in body weight do not fully reflect body composition change, and weight loss is uncertain for patients with large tumor, pleural effusion, or severe body edema (10). Therefore, a more qualified indicator of this wasting condition is needed to predict the prognosis of HCC.

Sarcopenia is defined by the loss of skeletal muscle mass, quality, and strength. The causes of sarcopenia include aging, disuse (poor performance status), nutritional deficiencies, advanced organ failure, inflammatory disease, and cancer treatment-related toxicities (11). Noteworthy is that there is evidence that sarcopenia is prevalent in cancer patients, regardless of stage of disease and nutritional status (12) and it is identified as a poor prognostic factor for various types of malignancies (1316). Particularly, sarcopenia occurs frequently in cases of HCC after treatment (1719) and many studies on the association of HCC prognosis with sarcopenia were performed. These studies have shown that sarcopenia was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with HCC following partial hepatectomy, intra-arterial HCC therapy, or after sorafenib (1720). However, few studies have investigated that sarcopenia is an independent predictor of prognosis in patients receiving RT for HCC.

In this study, we investigated the prevalence and prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients that underwent RT for HCC. In addition, we also evaluated the associated factors that induce sarcopenia after RT.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection

The medical records and radiology database at Gangnam Severance hospital were searched for patients with primary HCC stage I-IVB (Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan [LCSGJ]) that underwent RT to the liver from January 2009 to November 2016. HCC was diagnosed based on typical dynamic study findings of enhanced staining in the early phase and attenuation in the delayed phase (21). Patients who did not receive RT directly to the liver or those who did not complete RT were excluded. We evaluated 156 patients who were eligible for our study.

Treatment

In this study, the aim of RT was classified as definitive, salvage, and palliative. Definitive aim meant treating the first diagnosed HCC for the purpose of complete remission. Salvage aim meant retreatment if previous local treatment of HCC failed. Palliative aim was defined as treatment for symptom control when cure was difficult to achieve.

Patients were treated with RT alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). In the CCRT group, concurrent hepatic arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was delivered during RT. Most patients received conventional RT (30–70 Gy in 10–30 fractions) with 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), and a small number of patients received SBRT (36–60 Gy in four fractions).

Treatment before RT was classified as surgery, systemic chemotherapy, or local treatment (TACE or TACI or RFA). All surgeries were partial hepatectomies, and most of the patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy received sorafenib regimen.

Definition of Sarcopenia

Sarcopenia was identified at two-time points: pre- and post-RT. Pre-RT sarcopenia was diagnosed with data from the simulation computed tomography (CT) prior to RT, while post-RT sarcopenia was diagnosed with data from the follow-up CT taken within 3 months from the end of RT.

We retrospectively measured the cross-sectional area of muscle at the level of the third lumbar vertebra using baseline CT images. The muscles were quantified within a Hounsfield unit (HU) range of −29 to +150, and muscle boundaries were manually corrected as needed (Figure 1) (22, 23). Then, we calculated the L3 skeletal muscle index (L3-SMI) as follows:

The cross-sectional area of muscle at L3 spine level on CT (cm2)Height × Height (m2)

Sarcopenia defined by international consensus of cancer cachexia was <55 cm2/m2 for men and <39 cm2/m2 for women (8). However, this is based on studies among Westerners, and different standards are needed for Asians with differences in their intrinsic muscles. Therefore, we used the Korean-specific cut off values defined in other studies. Sarcopenia was defined as an L3-SMI of <49 cm2/m2 for men and <41 cm2/m2 for women as proposed by Korean-specific cut off values (24).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Segmented computed tomography (CT) images of patients with (A) and without (B) sarcopenia who had similar body mass indices. Skeletal muscle was measured using the MIM Vista software (MIM corp., version 6.1, OH, USA).

Data Collection

Demographic and treatment characteristics of individual patients were obtained from the medical records, including age at diagnosis, sex, tumor stage, liver enzymes, Child-Pugh classification, tumor marker, and treatment before RT. All patients underwent initial and response evaluation based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Height and weight were recorded at first visit to our department. The BMI grouping based on the World Health Organization criteria is as follows: BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (underweight), BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2 (normal weight), BMI 25–30 kg/m2 (overweight), and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (obesity).

Information was collected on the following variables to analyze the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS): age; sex; viral infection (hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus); total dose of RT; RT modality; planning target volume (PTV); CCRT; Child-Pugh classification (A vs. B + C); HCC stage at the time of RT; portal vein tumor thrombus; prior treatment (resection, chemotherapy, TACE or TACI or RFA); alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, cut off value 20 ng/mL); protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II, cut off value 40 mAU/mL); serum total protein (cut off value 6.0 g/dL); serum albumin level (cut off value 3.4 g/dL); albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade; and BMI. The ALBI score was derived from the formula (log10 bilirubin [μmol/L] × 0.66) + (albumin [g/L] × −0.0852).

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics of patients with and without sarcopenia were compared via the Pearson χ2 test for categorical data and independent t-test for continuous data.

OS was defined as the time from start of RT until death or last patient contact. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariate survival analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression, and variables with a p < 0.10 in univariate analysis were included. The multivariate analysis for risk factor of post-RT sarcopenia was also performed using logistic regression analysis.

All p-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS, version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Patient and Treatment Characteristics

The baseline characteristics of total 156 patients are listed in Table 1. For all the patients, the median L3-SMI for pre-RT was 46.4 cm2/m2 (range 29.5–66.6 cm2/m2) in men and 38.4 cm2/m2 (range 26.1–57.5 cm2/m2) in women. According to Korean-specific cut off standard, 99 patients (63.5%) had pre-RT sarcopenia; 81 patients (81.8%) were men and 18 (18.2%) women.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristics of total patients with HCC and patients with HCC according to the presence of pre-RT sarcopenia.

Of the 156 patients, 90 patients had stage IV disease, of whom 21 patients had distant metastasis. Most patients were Child-Pugh class A (n = 96, 61.5%) and few were Child-Pugh class C (n = 3, 1.9%). According to the BMI, patients with normal weight were the most frequent (n = 104, 66.7%), followed by those who were overweight (n = 41, 26.3%). Pre-RT sarcopenia group had higher PIVKA-II (p = 0.001), lower serum total protein level (p = 0.027), lower serum albumin level (p = 0.015), and lower percentage of overweight/obesity BMI (p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, pre-RT sarcopenic patients had poorer Child-Pugh class and more advanced stage.

Regarding treatment characteristics, 81 patients (51.9%) were treated with concurrent intra-arterial chemotherapy, and 75 patients (48.1%) were treated with RT alone. Most of the patients (n = 153, 98.1%) received conventional RT, and only three patients (1.9%) received SBRT. Median prescribed equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, assuming α/β = 10 (EQD210) was 52.1 Gy. Compared with the group without pre-RT sarcopenia, the pre-RT sarcopenia group had a higher percentage of patients with previous systemic chemotherapy (p = 0.011), lower total prescribed dose (p = 0.029), and larger PTV (p = 0.017). Pre-RT sarcopenic patients had more RT for palliative treatment than pre-RT non-sarcopenic patients, even though no statistically significant difference was found.

Analysis of Survival

Over a median follow-up duration of 9.3 months (range 1.2–81.2 months), 125 patients died. Patients in the pre-RT sarcopenia group showed poorer OS than those in the pre-RT non-sarcopenia group (median OS: 7.1 months vs. 15.3 months, p < 0.001; Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival in patients with or without pre-RT sarcopenia.

The evaluation of post-RT sarcopenia was available in 148 patients. Only four patients in pre-RT sarcopenia group had overcome the sarcopenia after RT. Among the 57 patients who did not have sarcopenia before RT, 20 developed sarcopenia after RT (35.1%). Compared to those without sarcopenia after RT (n = 35), these 20 patients showed significantly lower OS (median 14.1 vs. 17.5 months, p = 0.018, Figure 3). The prognosis of these patients was as poor as those with sarcopenia before RT.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival in patients without pre-RT sarcopenia. Comparing overall survival between patients with newly developed sarcopenia after receiving RT and patients who still had no sarcopenia after RT. RT, radiotherapy.

Prognostic Factors for Survival

The results of Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for OS are shown in Table 2. In univariate analysis, advanced stage at the time of RT (HR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.28–5.40; p = 0.009); Child-Pugh classification B or C (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02–2.10; p = 0.041); higher AFP (HR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.10–2.41; p = 0.015); lower serum albumin level (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.35–0.73; p < 0.001); higher ALBI score (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.47–2.75; p < 0.001); lower total dose of RT (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31–0.64; p < 0.001); and larger PTV (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00–1.04; p = 0.021) were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS. Pre-RT sarcopenia (HR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.76–3.89; p < 0.001) was also significant for OS.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS.

Then we performed multivariate analysis; ALBI score (HR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.33–4.17; p = 0.003); total dose [hazard ratio (HR): 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27–0.71; p = 0.001); and pre-RT sarcopenia (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.53–3.70; p < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS.

In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in 57 patients without pre-RT sarcopenia. As a result, lower total dose (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24–0.89; p = 0.021), higher BMI (HR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.22–4.71; p = 0.011), and newly developed sarcopenia after RT (HR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.28–5.02; p = 0.008) significantly affected survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Risk Factors for Newly Developed Sarcopenia After RT

We performed logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors associated with patients with newly developed sarcopenia after RT (Table 3). Older age [odd ratio (OR): 310.19; p = 0.007]; Child-Pugh classification B or C (OR: 15.24; p = 0.047); higher AFP (OR: 128.49; p = 0.008); higher PIVKA-II (OR: 118.54; p = 0.027); and larger PTV (OR: 51.31; p = 0.026) were significant factors for newly developed sarcopenia after RT.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of newly developed sarcopenia after RT.

Discussion

We showed that sarcopenia is an independent factor affecting survival rates in HCC patients who have received RT to liver. In addition, pre-RT sarcopenia and newly developed sarcopenia after RT was significantly associated with poor survival. Patients who were older and had higher PIVKA-II level before treatment were more likely to develop sarcopenia after RT.

Recently, many hospitals have been using sarcopenia as a predictor of prognosis in cancer patients instead of cachexia, which better reflects nutrition and general condition. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in the Elderly recommended the use of the presence of both reduced muscle mass and muscle function to identify sarcopenia (25). Methods for measuring muscle mass include measuring the total skeletal muscle mass using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry or obtaining L3-SMI through CT. Muscle function can be determined by measuring gait speed or handgrip strength. However, muscle function has the disadvantage of a difficult and subjective measurement, and several studies use only muscle mass measurement. In our study, we measured the skeletal muscle mass through CT, since this makes it easy to diagnose pre-RT sarcopenia, because the simulation CT is always taken for RT. If sarcopenia is observed on simulation CT performed for RT, we can expect that the prognosis of RT will be poor.

The hypothesis that liver disease induces sarcopenia has been reported in several studies. There are several studies showing that sarcopenia is significantly increased in patients who undergo surgery, received chemotherapy, or local therapy in HCC (1820). Liver cirrhosis also has a similar relationship (26). Although the mechanism of this association has not been elucidated yet, low hepatic functional reserve and protein energy malnutrition due to liver disease may be the main causes of sarcopenia. In addition, reduced protein synthesis and degeneration of proteins by pro-inflammatory cytokines released from tumor cells may lead to a decrease in the amount of skeletal muscle mass. Our finding, which showed sarcopenia at a lower serum albumin and total protein level, may be attributed to protein energy malnutrition, consistent with previous studies (1820, 26). However, Child-Pugh classification and ALBI score, which more accurately reflects liver function, did not differ between the two (Pre-RT sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic) groups (Table 1). In addition, higher PIVKA-II level, was presumed to be related to tumor burden, but the pathophysiological mechanism is also unknown. An additional biological approach would be needed to explain this result.

Chemotherapy, which is used for cancer treatment, is also suggested to induce sarcopenia by decreasing protein synthesis by expressing molecules (such as Ras, Raf, MEK, and ER) and decreasing proliferation of muscle-cell by expressing mTOR (27, 28). Like the observations in those studies, Pre-RT sarcopenia group had higher percentage of patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy before receiving RT in our study. Other studies have also shown that sarcopenia is significantly more frequent in advanced renal cell carcinoma or HCC patients with sorafenib, which is consistent with our findings (29, 30). However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis, previous systemic chemotherapy was not a significant factor, and this might have been due to the small number of patients who received chemotherapy prior to RT.

In some studies, sarcopenia has been suggested to be due to decreased appetite, general condition, and dysphagia (31, 32). In our study, sarcopenic patients have a lower BMI than non-sarcopenic patients. Because of this result, it may seem that there is no difference between sarcopenia and cachexia. However, sarcopenia and cachexia are independent because only about 4% of sarcopenic patients were underweight status (BMI <18.5 kg/m2).

Several studies have also been published regarding the fact that sarcopenia causes poor prognosis in the treatment of cancer. Sarcopenia is significantly associated with prognosis of cancer treatment in colon, breast, lung, head and neck cancer, and HCC (1315). Especially in HCC, prognosis is poor when sarcopenia is present in patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy, and or local therapy (TACE, TACI, RFA) (1820). This tendency is found not only in HCC but also in liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis, hepatitis, and liver transplantation (26, 33, 34). Our study also showed that survival was significantly poor when sarcopenia accompanied HCC. The mechanism by which sarcopenia causes poor prognosis in cancer treatment is not yet known. At present, a possible mechanism is that sarcopenia may reduce muscle strength, resulting in poor physical performance, which may reduce tolerability for cancer treatment (14). In addition, another possible mechanism is that as the amount of stored protein decreases due to sarcopenia, the metabolism and immunity decrease proportionally to this, leading to a decrease in antitumor response and an increase in mortality (35). However, the molecular mechanism of sarcopenia remains poorly understood, and further studies are needed.

In our study, univariate and multivariate analyses of OS showed that ALBI score, total irradiated dose, and pre-RT sarcopenia were significant factors. OS was significantly better when the total dose was higher than EQD2 52.1 Gy (median dose), which was in line with previous findings (36).

Consistent with the hypothesis that the low hepatic functional reserve will cause sarcopenia, ALBI score was significantly associated with survival. Compared to Child-Pugh classification, which scores clinical measures including encephalopathy, ALBI only scores objective values (albumin and bilirubin). Therefore, other studies have recently shown that the ALBI score can be used to evaluate the liver function more accurately than Child-Pugh classification (37, 38).

Among those who did not have pre-RT sarcopenia, 20 patients had newly developed sarcopenia after receiving RT. These 20 patients were significantly older, higher Child-Pugh classification B or C, higher level of AFP and PIVKA-II, and larger PTV than in patients who still had no sarcopenia after RT. Older age effect seems to be accounted for by age-related degradation of metabolism and RT tolerance. AFP and PIVKA-II may also be related to tumor burden, but the pathophysiologic mechanism is still unknown. Child-Pugh classification is a factor that is related to liver function. The larger the PTV, the greater the effect on liver function. It is very important to set up the RT field in these patients because older age, decreased liver function, and larger tumor burden eventually decrease the patient's nutritional status and reduce the muscle mass. Similarly, the total functional liver volume in sarcopenia patients is small and should be considered in surgery, when resection is performed (39). Therefore, from the radiation oncologist's point of view, if the patient needs large volume treatment, there is need to confirm whether these conditions exist in the patients.

Patients with sarcopenia prior to RT, and those newly developing sarcopenia after RT had significantly lower OS than patients who had no sarcopenia before and after receiving RT. One possibility is that sarcopenia may occur due to low hepatic functional reserve induced by progression of HCC, which may result in lower OS. Therefore, in addition to patients who have already developed sarcopenia prior to RT, patients at high risk of sarcopenia after RT—that is those of older age, with Child-Pugh classification B or C, higher AFP and PIVKA-II, larger PTV, and poor prognostic factor of HCC—also need intensive nutritional support during RT to prevent the development of sarcopenia after treatment. According to the study conducted in our hospital, repetitive and intensive nutritional counseling is needed to improve the quality of life and prevent deterioration of nutritional status in patients with cancer around the head and neck, thorax, and abdomen receiving RT (40). Nutritional interventions in HCC are also expected to show good results in sarcopenia patients. In our prospective study on the effect of oral supplementation in HCC patients undergoing RT, we found that serum albumin levels increased significantly in the group given oral supplementation with branched-chain amino acid (41). Therefore, oral supplementation in patients receiving RT for HCC is very important, in terms of nutritional support. In our hospital, nutritional counseling is given to all patients regardless of sarcopenia before RT in HCC patients. This may likely improve survival rate in these patients.

One of the limitations of this study was that because of the retrospective analysis, not all variables and possible confounders could be assessed in all patients. In our study, pre-RT sarcopenic patients group was significantly larger in PTV than the non-sarcopenic group. Therefore, this result is probably related to the higher RT dose in non-sarcopenia patients. In Cox regression analysis to determine the OS-related prognostic factors (Table 2), RT dose had a significant effect on OS, but not PTV volume. In patients with low disease extent and good performance status, the treatment volume would be small and such patients could be given a high dose. Likewise, patients' characteristics and treatment were heterogeneous, suggesting the possibility that various confounding factors may exist, which is considered a limitation of retrospective study.

There were also significant differences in previous chemotherapy, RT dose, serum albumin level, and total protein level between patients with and without pre-RT sarcopenia. This is because the degree of disease had varied considerably by the time the HCC patients reached the point of considering RT. However, there were no significant differences in indicators of liver function such as Child-Pugh classification and ALBI score. Moreover, there were no clinically significant differences between each of the two groups in Table 1 (Pre-RT sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic) and Supplementary Table 1 (Newly developed sarcopenic and sustained non-sarcopenic) characteristics. Nevertheless, these findings could be due to selection bias and unmeasured confounders and are considered to be the limitations of this study. Therefore, from a physician's point of view, efforts such as matching based on these factors may help to reduce the selection bias and unmeasured confounders. However, the disease status and treatment were too heterogeneous relative to the number of patients, making matching difficult. In addition, we did not analyze the treatment after RT, and further analysis is needed because it may also affect prognosis. Nonetheless, this study is one of the largest analyses to assess the prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with HCC who received RT. Also, as far as we know, the strength of this study is that it is one of the few studies that analyzed the prognostic significance of sarcopenia in cancer patients receiving RT, especially in patients with HCC.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that sarcopenia is frequent in patients with HCC, especially in those with lower liver function, higher tumor markers, and larger PTV; thus, these patients are more likely to develop sarcopenia after RT. Thus, the RT field should be carefully determined for these patients from the point of view of the radiation oncologist. Assessment of skeletal muscle depletion by CT imaging is an objective tool useful for diagnosing sarcopenia. In addition, pre-RT sarcopenia and newly developed sarcopenia after RT, as determined by simulation CT for RT, was significantly associated with poorer OS in HCC patients. Early intervention such as nutritional support and exercise therapies could prevent muscle wasting and could be effective in improving the prognosis of HCC patients. Prospective studies are needed to clarify optimum reference values of sarcopenia for predicting cancer-specific outcomes for HCC patients.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Health System (No. 3-2019-0039). Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

JL, YC, and IL: study concept and design and manuscript preparation. JK and IL: data acquisition and quality control of data. JL, YC, SP, and IL: data analysis and interpretation. SP and JK: manuscript review.

Funding

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Yonsei University Health System (No. 3-2019-0039). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (No. NRF-2019R1A2C1085958).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The abstract of this study was accepted for poster viewing at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), San Antonio, Texas, USA October 2018.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.01075/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Singal AG, El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma from epidemiology to prevention: translating knowledge into practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2015) 13:2140–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Seong J, Park HC, Han KH, Chon CY. Clinical results and prognostic factors in radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 158 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2003) 55:329–36. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03929-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sanuki N, Takeda A, Oku Y, Mizuno T, Aoki Y, Eriguchi T, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective outcome analysis in 185 patients. Acta Oncol. (2014) 53:399–404. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.820342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kim SW, Oh D, Park HC, Lim DH, Shin SW, Cho SK, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiation therapy for treatment-naive patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol J. (2014) 32:14–22. doi: 10.3857/roj.2014.32.1.14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yoon SM, Ryoo BY, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Shin JH, An JH, et al. Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiotherapy vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic vascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. (2018) 4:661–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. op den Winkel M, Nagel D, Sappl J, op den Winkel P, Lamerz R, Zech CJ, et al. Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e45066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045066

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Tajika M, Kato M, Mohri H, Miwa Y, Kato T, Ohnishi H, et al. Prognostic value of energy metabolism in patients with viral liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. (2002) 18:229–34. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00754-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. (2011) 12:489–95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Baracos VE, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Gioulbasanis I, Antoun S. Body composition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a contemporary view of cancer cachexia with the use of computed tomography image analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. (2010) 91:1133S−7S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28608C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kim EY, Kim YS, Park I, Ahn HK, Cho EK, Jeong YM. Prognostic significance of CT-determined sarcopenia in patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. (2015) 10:1795–9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, Bhasin S, Morley JE, Newman AB, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2011) 12:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wallengren O, Iresjö B-M, Lundholm K, Bosaeus I. Loss of muscle mass in the end of life in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. (2015) 23:79–86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2332-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Grossberg AJ, Chamchod S, Fuller CD, Mohamed AS, Heukelom J, Eichelberger H, et al. Association of body composition with survival and locoregional control of radiotherapy-treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. (2016) 2:782–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Prado CM, Lieffers JR, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Sawyer MB, Martin L, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. (2008) 9:629–35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Tan BH, Birdsell LA, Martin L, Baracos VE, Fearon KC. Sarcopenia in an overweight or obese patient is an adverse prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2009) 15:6973–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cho Y, Kim JW, Keum KC, Lee CG, Jeung HC, Lee IJ. Prognostic significance of sarcopenia with inflammation in patients with head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol. (2018) 8:457. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Dodson RM, Firoozmand A, Hyder O, Tacher V, Cosgrove DP, Bhagat N, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following intra-arterial therapy of hepatic malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg. (2013) 17:2123–32. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2348-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Yamashita YI, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Soejima Y, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of prognosis in patients following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. (2013) 100:1523–30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Iritani S, Imai K, Takai K, Hanai T, Ideta T, Miyazaki T, et al. Skeletal muscle depletion is an independent prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. (2015) 50:323–32. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0964-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Imai K, Takai K, Hanai T, Ideta T, Miyazaki T, Kochi T, et al. Skeletal muscle depletion predicts the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Int J Mol Sci. (2015) 16:9612–24. doi: 10.3390/ijms16059612

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Korean Liver Cancer Association, National Cancer Center K. 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association–National Cancer Center Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Liver. (2019) 13:227–99. doi: 10.5009/gnl19024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Mourtzakis M, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2008) 33:997–1006. doi: 10.1139/H08-075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner R, Heymsfield S, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol. (1998) 85:115–22. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kim Y-S, Lee Y, Chung Y-S, Lee D-J, Joo N-S, Hong D, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in the Korean population based on the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2012) 67:1107–13. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European Working Group on sarcopenia in older people: sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. (2010) 39:412–23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Montano–Loza AJ, Meza–Junco J, Prado CM, Lieffers JR, Baracos VE, Bain VG, et al. Muscle wasting is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2012) 10:166–73.e161. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2013) 10:90. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Yakabe M, Ogawa S, Akishita M. Clinical manifestations and pathophysiology of sarcopenia. Biomed Sci. (2015) 1:10–7. doi: 10.11648/j.bs.20150102.11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Antoun S, Birdsell L, Sawyer MB, Venner P, Escudier B, Baracos VE. Association of skeletal muscle wasting with treatment with sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from a placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol. (2010) 28:1054–60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Mir O, Coriat R, Boudou-Rouquette P, Ropert S, Durand J-P, Cessot A, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma pre-treated with sorafenib. Med Oncol. (2012) 29:2793–9. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0208-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ali S, Garcia JM. Sarcopenia, cachexia and aging: diagnosis, mechanisms and therapeutic options - a mini-review. Gerontology. (2014) 60:294–305. doi: 10.1159/000356760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Yoshimura Y, Wakabayashi H, Bise T, Tanoue M. Prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with activities of daily living and dysphagia in convalescent rehabilitation ward inpatients. Clin Nutr. (2018) 37:2022–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Englesbe MJ, Patel SP, He K, Lynch RJ, Schaubel DE, Harbaugh C, et al. Sarcopenia and mortality after liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. (2010) 211:271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bhanji RA, Narayanan P, Allen AM, Malhi H, Watt KD. Sarcopenia in hiding: the risk and consequence of underestimating muscle dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. (2017) 66:2055–65. doi: 10.1002/hep.29420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Prado CM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ, Reiman T, Mourtzakis M, Tonkin K, et al. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res. (2009) 15:2920–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Park HC, Seong J, Han KH, Chon CY, Moon YM, Suh CO. Dose-response relationship in local radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2002) 54:150–5. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02864-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, Satomura S, Teng M, Reeves H, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach—the ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol. (2015) 33:550–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Toyoda H, Lai PB, O'Beirne J, Chong CC, Berhane S, Reeves H, et al. Long-term impact of liver function on curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: application of the ALBI grade. Br J Cancer. (2016) 114:744–50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Dello SA, Lodewick TM, van Dam RM, Reisinger KW, van den Broek MA, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Sarcopenia negatively affects preoperative total functional liver volume in patients undergoing liver resection. HPB. (2013) 15:165–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00517.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Um MH, Choi MY, Lee SM, Lee IJ, Lee CG, Park YK. Intensive nutritional counseling improves PG-SGA scores and nutritional symptoms during and after radiotherapy in Korean cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. (2014) 22:2997–3005. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2304-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lee IJ, Seong J, Bae JI, You SH, Rhee Y, Lee JH. Effect of oral supplementation with branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) during radiotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a double-blind randomized study. Cancer Res Treat. (2011) 43:24–31. doi: 10.4143/crt.2011.43.1.24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcopenia, radiotherapy, treatment outcome, survival

Citation: Lee J, Cho Y, Park S, Kim JW and Lee IJ (2019) Skeletal Muscle Depletion Predicts the Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 9:1075. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01075

Received: 14 May 2019; Accepted: 30 September 2019;
Published: 15 October 2019.

Edited by:

Charles A. Kunos, Investigational Drug Branch, National Cancer Institute (NIH), United States

Reviewed by:

Salma Jabbour, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, United States
Kristen Spencer, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, United States

Copyright © 2019 Lee, Cho, Park, Kim and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ik Jae Lee, IKJAE412@yuhs.ac