Impact Factor 4.848 | CiteScore 3.5
More on impact ›

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 16 July 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01118

Repositioning Quinacrine Toward Treatment of Ovarian Cancer by Rational Combination With TRAIL

Rui Liang1,2, Yuanfei Yao1,3, Guangyu Wang1,3, Er Yue1, Guangchao Yang1, Xiuying Qi1, Yang Wang1, Ling Zhao1, Tongsen Zheng1,3, Yanqiao Zhang3 and Edward Wenge Wang1*
  • 1Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, United States
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Suzhou Vocational Health College, Suzhou, China
  • 3Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China

Quinacrine has been identified as a potent DR5-inducing agent that sensitizes cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In the current study, we found that quinacrine increased DR5 mRNA levels significantly in ovarian cancer cell lines regardless of p53 status. Further study showed the half-life of DR5 in quinacrine-treated cells was significantly prolonged, indicating that DR5 protein degradation was inhibited by quinacrine. We tested if the combination of TRAIL and quinacrine could be effective in ovarian cancer treatment in vitro and in ovarian cancer xenograft mouse models. We found that quinacrine enhanced TRAIL sensitivity or reversed TRAIL resistance in all the ovarian cancer cell lines tested. Mice treated with quinacrine and TRAIL remained disease-free for up to 20 weeks, however, mice treated with TRAIL or quinacrine alone and in control group died within ~8 weeks after treatment. Intraperitoneal delivery of quinacrine and TRAIL is rational and practical with extraordinary synergistic anti-cancer effects in preclinical models of ovarian cancer. Clinical investigation of combining quinacrine with TRAIL for ovarian cancer treatment is warranted.

Introduction

The extrinsic apoptotic pathway has been well-investigated and characterized; however, targeting this pathway for cancer treatment has not been successful (1, 2). The death receptor ligand TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) appears to be an ideal cancer therapeutic with minimal toxicity in preclinical models. It can induce cell death in cancer cells but not normal cells (35). Phase I studies of recombinant human TRAIL showed it was well-tolerated with a half-life range from 0.56 to 1.02 h (6). However, further clinical studies on various human cancers in combination with different standard chemotherapy regimens showed no remarkable synergistic anti-cancer effects (79), and in a trial for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, TRAIL plus chemotherapy only moderately prolonged progression free survival (PFS) (10). Due to limited clinical benefit, clinical trials using recombinant human TRAIL, as well as agonist antibodies to DR4 and DR5 (death receptors) were suspended.

TRAIL induces apoptosis in cancer cells by engaging death receptors, DR4 and DR5. Subsequently pro-caspase 8 is cleaved to become active caspase 8 by recruiting FADD (fas-associated death domain) to form DISC (death-inducing signaling complex). Cleaved caspase 8 then induces a series of caspase reactions and eventually activates caspase 3/7 to execute extrinsic apoptosis pathway. In most circumstances, cleaved caspase 8 also activates bid, which sends death signals to mitochondrion and simultaneously promotes intrinsic pathways to induce apoptosis. Death signaling in normal cells is well-controlled and regulated, either by limiting production of death receptors or facilitating degradation to keep a low level of death receptors. It has been reported that negative regulators such as FLIP (FLICE [Fas-associated death-domain-like IL-1beta-converting enzyme]-inhibitory proteins) could prevent DISC activation (11). Subcellular localization of death receptors may also restrict access of TRAIL to its receptors and result in TRAIL resistance (12). The discrepancy between preclinical and clinical outcomes with respect to TRAIL may be explained by TRAIL resistance in primary cancer cells from patients (1) that have a higher threshold for reactivation of the extrinsic pathway than in preclinical models. TRAIL and other agonist antibodies against death receptors are not potent enough to elicit a significant anti-cancer effect in clinical studies. Therefore, overcoming TRAIL resistance in cancer cells is critical to successfully targeting the extrinsic pathway for cancer treatment.

Despite attempts to reverse TRAIL resistance using DNA-damaging agents (13), kinase inhibitors (14), immune checkpoint inhibitors (15), and other targeting agents, none have shown clinical significance. While searching for small molecules targeting p53 (1618), we identified a category of small molecules including quinacrine that induced substantial high levels of DR5 and enhanced TRAIL sensitivity or reversed TRAIL resistance in almost all cancer cell lines tested (16, 17, 19). Further studies revealed the underlying mechanism by which these small molecules block the lysosomal degradation pathway and result in accumulation of death receptors and the associated DISC in the cytoplasm, sustaining death signaling and reversing TRAIL resistance. Quinacrine, a bioactive acridine derivative that has been used as an anti-malarial agent for treatment and prophylaxis, stood out as a potent extrinsic pathway activator able to reverse TRAIL resistance in human cancer cells, including ovarian cancer cell lines. These studies provided the rationale to test the combination of quinacrine and TRAIL for ovarian cancer treatment.

In this work, we demonstrated that quinacrine induced high level of DR5 and reversed TRAIL resistance in human ovarian cancer cell lines. Quinacrine not only significantly induces high mRNA level of DR5, but also reducesDR5 protein degradation, most likely in lysosomes. Further experiments showed that quinacrine induces permeabilization of lysosomal membranes, as manifested by aggregation of galectin-3 in lysosome, which may also contribute to the synergistic effect of quinacrine and TRAIL in executing cancer cell death. Surprisingly, interperitoneally delivery of TRAIL and quinacrine showed remarkable synergistic effect in treating mice bearing A2780 ovarian cancer xenografts. Our data provides conclusive evidence for rational combination of quinacrine and TRAIL for ovarian cancer treatment.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and Chemicals

Ovarian cell lines SK-OV-3, OVCAR-4, OVCAR-8, and A2780 were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Neuromics, Edina, MN), L-glutamine and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified incubator (5% CO2) at 37°C. Quinacrine, z-VAD-fmk, and cycloheximide (CHX) were obtained from Millipore Sigma (St. Louis, MO). D-Luciferin, potassium salt, was purchase from BioVision (Milpitas, CA).

Cell Viability Assay

The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) for cell viability assay was purchased from Dojindo Molecular Technologies (Rockville, MD). Cells were plated in 96-well plates in culture overnight and treated with TRAIL, quinacrine, or in combination at indicated concentrations for 16 h. CCK-8 solution was added to each well; 10 μl/well. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured by the Tecan Spark 10M multimode microplate reader. Drug synergy analysis was conducted using CompuSyn software (20). Alternatively, we used Coomassie blue stain to visualize live cells attached to culturing plate. OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells growing nearly 100% confluency in 12-well plates were treated with TRAIL 100 ng/ml, quinacrine 20 μM, or in combination for 16 h. Then died or floating cells were washed out with PBS for 3 times. Attached live cells were stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Research Products International, Mt Prospect, IL) in 50% methanol and 10% glacial acetic acid for 10 min. The plate wells were washes 3 times with tab water and dried for image scan.

Caspase Assay

The Caspase-Glo® 3/7 Assay kit was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Ovarian cancer cells were plated in a black 96-well plate with clear bottom. After overnight incubation, cells were treated for 16 h with TRAIL, quinacrine, pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk or in combination. Luminescence intensity was recorded by a Tecan Spark 10M multimode microplate reader and caspase 3/7 activity was calculated per the manufacturer's instructions.

Plasmid Construction, Recombinant Protein Purification, Retrovirus, and Lentivirus Production

The human TRAIL cDNA fragment (coding amino acids 94–281) was codon optimized, synthesized by IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. Coralville, Iowa) and inserted into a bacterial expression vector, pQE80L (Qiagen) to generate a His-tagged human recombinant TRAIL, which was purified per a protocol published previously (21). The human DR5 cDNA fragment (coding amino acids from 1 to 334) was codon optimized and synthesized by IDT, fused with EGFP at the C-terminus, and cloned into the pBabe-puro retroviral vector. The ORF of galectin-3 was codon optimized and synthesized by IDT and cloned into thepLVEF-1a lentivirus expression vector (kindly provided by Dr. Guihua Sun, Diabetes & Metabolism Research Institute at City of Hope) fused with mCherry at the N-terminus. For retrovirus production, the pBabe/DR5-EGFP plasmid was transfected into Phoenix cells for packaging. Virus containing supernatant was harvested 48–72 h post-transfection for target cell infection in the presence of polybrene at 10 μg/ml. The lentivirus vector pLVEF-1a-mCherry-galection-3 was co-transfected into 293T cells with packaging plasmids for lentivirus production. Virus containing supernatant was harvested 48–72 h post-transfection and purified for target cell infection in the presence of polybrene at 10 μg/ml.

Antibodies and Western Blotting

Antibodies against human caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9, and DR5 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Antibodies against p53, DO1, was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX). The Ran antibody was purchased from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ). Cell lysates were prepared using RIPA lysis buffer. Protein samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 4–20% mini-protein TGX gels (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) and transferred onto Immobilon™ membranes (Millipore, MA). The membrane was blocked using blocking buffer for 1 h and probed with primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C, washed, and then subjected to secondary antibodies labeled with IRDye (LI-COR Biosciences; Lincoln, NE). Blots were scanned using the Odyssey CLx Imaging System (LI-COR).

Quantitative Real Time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Complementary DNA was synthesized using the Super-script III first-strand cDNA synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For quantitative real-time PCR, cDNA and specific primer pairs were mixed with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK), and run on the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). The following primers were used for amplification of DR5: DR5 (sense) 5′-ATGGAACAACGGGGACAGAAC-3′ and (antisense) 5′-CTGCTGGGGAGCTAGGTCT-3′. The threshold cycle number (Ct) for gene expression was calculated, and GAPDH was used as a reference. Delta-delta Ct values for gene expression were presented as relative fold induction.

Flow Cytometry

Cells were treated with the test compounds for 16 h and cells were collected upon trypsinization and centrifugation. The pellets were washed with PBS and incubated with Annexin V and DAPI (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) in binding buffer for 15 min. Then, 400 μl of cells in binding buffer was loaded and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

Immunofluorescent Staining

A2780 cells in a chamber slide treated with quinacrine (15 μM, 4 h) were fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) for 10 min in room temperature, then blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min. Anti-Lamp2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) was added and incubated for 1 h. Goat anti-rabbit IgG AlexaFluor-568 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used as secondary antibody. Nucleus was counterstained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories Burlingame, CA). Images were captured with a ZEISS LSM 880 confocal laser scanning microscope (White Plains, NY).

Tumor Xenograft Studies

All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with animal care guidelines approved by the Institution Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of City of Hope. Female NSG mice (6–8 weeks old with body weight range from 19 to 23 grams) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. The animals were acclimated for 1 week prior to the study. A2780-luc cells (5 × 106) in 100 μL of PBS were injected intraperitoneally into NSG mice. Five days later tumor cells in the mice were imaged after intraperitoneal injection of 2 mg/mouse D-luciferin by SPECTRAL Lago X Imaging System (Spectral Instruments Imaging, Tucson, AZ). Bioluminescent images were captured and the intensity was quantified using the Aura Imaging Software developed by Spectral Instruments Imaging as a baseline on day 0. Mice were then randomly divided into four groups and treated with quinacrine, TRAIL, quinacrine plus TRAIL, or control with vehicle as follows: quinacrine was delivered at a dose of 50 mg/kg on day 1. TRAIL was injected intraperitoneally at 10 mg/kg on day 1, 2, 3, and 4. On day 5, mice were reimaged using the Lago X Imaging System. A repeated cycle was started on day 7. Mice were monitored closely and euthanized when cancer-related symptoms developed such as weight loss, dehydration, abdomen distention, and impaired ambulation per the IACUC protocol.

Statistical Analysis

For data analysis, experimental samples were compared to control by one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and two-way variance analysis. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant when the p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism program (GraphPad Software Inc.). Combination index was calculated using CompuSyn software (22) developed by ComboSyn, Inc. Synergy, additivity, and antagonism are defined as CI < 1, CI = 1, and CI > 1, respectively.

Results

Quinacrine Synergizes With TRAIL in Inducing Apoptosis in Ovarian Cancer Cells

We chose four commonly used ovarian cancer cell lines and tested their sensitivity to TRAIL—A2780, an ovarian adenocarcinoma, endometrioid type cell line; OVCAR-4, a grade 2 ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line; OVCAR-8, a grade 3 ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line; and SK-OV-3, a high grade serous ovarian carcinoma cell line. OVCAR-4 and SK-OV-3 were relatively sensitive to TRAIL, while A2780 and OVCAR-8 were resistant to TRAIL (Figure 1). After treatment with TRAIL alone at a concentration of 25 ng/ml for 16 h, less than half of SK-OV-3 cells and OVCAR-4 cells died, while following treatment together with quinacrine, almost all the cells died over 16 h, indicating a significant synergistic effect of quinacrine and TRAIL with a combination index (CI) below 1 (Supplementary Figure 1). The synergistic effect of the combination is more robust in TRAIL-resistant OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells (Figures 1C,D and Supplementary Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. In vitro synergistic anti-cancer effect of quinacrine in combination with TRAIL against human ovarian cancer cells. Ovarian cancer cell lines were treated with TRAIL (A) or quinacrine (QC) (B) with the indicated dose for 16 h and subjected to the CCK-8 assay. (C) SK-OV-3 and OVCAR-4 were treated with 25 ng/ml TRAIL, 10 μM quinacrine, or in combination for 16 h; OVCAR-8 and A2780 cell lines were treated with 100 ng/ml TRAIL, 20 μM quinacrine, or in combination for 16 h. (D) OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells in 12-well plates were treated with TRAIL 100 ng/ml, quinacrine 20 μM, or in combination for 16 h, then subjected Coomassie blue stain. ***p < 0.001. All experiments were performed at least three times, reproducible.

We further confirmed that quinacrine induces apoptosis in combination with TRAIL by flow cytometry using Annexin V and DAPI stain (Figure 2). Apoptosis is defined as positivity of Annexin V and DAPI stain (Figure 2B). Quinacrine or TRAIL alone failed to induce significant apoptotic cells, while combination of quinacrine and TRAIL induced significant apoptosis in cells double positive for Annexin V and DAPI stain (Figures 2A,B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Apoptosis induced by quinacrine and TRAIL in ovarian cancer cells. (A) Flow cytometry analysis by Annexin V/DAPI dual staining on cells treated with quinacrine (QC), TRAIL, or combination. (B) Apoptotic cells positive for Annexin V and DAPI, ***p < 0.001. (C) SK-OV-3 and OVCAR-4 were treated with 25 ng/ml TRAIL and 10 μM quinacrine, or in combination with caspase inhibitor zVad (20 μM); OVCAR-8 and A2780 were treated with 100 ng/ml TRAIL and 20 μM quinacrine, or in combination with zVad (20 μM). Cell viability tested by CCK-8 assay. (D) OVCAR-8 was treated with 100 ng/ml TRAIL and 20 μM quinacrine alone or in combination, and with the caspase inhibitor zVad (20 μM). Caspase 3/7 activity was tested 12 h after treatment by Promega caspase-glo 3/7 assay. ***p < 0.001. (E) Western blot of PARP, DR5, caspase-8 and caspase-9, caspase-3, in OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells treated with 100 ng/ml TRAIL, 20 μM quinacrine, or combination for 16 h.

We measured caspase 3/7 activity in quinacrine and TRAIL treated cells. Combination of TRAIL and quinacrine induced significant caspase 3/7 activity, while quinacrine or TRAIL alone failed to induce significant caspase 3/7 activity at the concentration and the time point illustrated (Figure 2D). Pre-treatment with z-Vad-fmk (zVad), a pan-caspase inhibitor (23), significantly rescued TRAIL/quinacrine-induced cell death in all four cell lines (Figure 2C). Caspase 3/7 activity induced by combination of quinacrine and TRAIL was also effectively blocked by zVad (Figure 2D). Cleavage of both caspase 8, a key caspase in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, and caspase 9, a key caspase in the intrinsic pathway, indicated both apoptotic pathways were activated by combination of quinacrine and TRAIL (Figure 2E). As a consequence, caspase 3 in the common pathway was also cleaved, as well as PARP1 (Figure 2E), indicating an irreversible apoptosis process induced by TRAIL and quinacrine.

Quinacrine Induces DR5 mRNA Levels and Blocks DR5 Protein Degradation

We tested TRAIL receptor DR5 protein and mRNA levels. As shown in Figures 2E, 3A, treatment with quinacrine induced significant protein levels of DR5 in the four ovarian cancer cell lines tested. We also tested p53 level in these cell lines treated with quinacrine because it is well-known that DR5 is a transcriptional target of p53 and quinacrine can stabilize p53 in a manner that is different from DNA-damage (16, 17). We used Adriamycin, a DNA-damage agent, as a positive control for p53 activation. Treatment of quinacrine or Adriamycin increased p53 protein levels equivalently in A2780 cells that carry a wild-type p53, while DR5 levels were significantly higher in quinacrine-treated A2780 cells compared to Adriamycin-treated cells (Figure 3A). No p53 was detected by Western blot in SKOV3 cell line, which is known to be a p53-deficient (24). The levels of p53 in OVCAR-4 and OVCAR-8 cells, both carry a mutant p53, were not changed after treatment of quinacrine or Adriamycin.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Quinacrine up-regulates DR5 through increasing of DR5 transcription and blocking DR5 protein degradation. (A) Ovarian cancer cell lines were treated with the indicated dose of Adriamycin (ADR) (μg/ml) or quinacrine (μM) for 8 h; p53, DR5, and Ran (loading control) were detected by Western blotting. p53 was not detected in p53-null SK-OV-3 cells (data not shown). (B) OVCAR-8 and A2780 were treated with quinacrine for 8 h. The mRNA level of DR5 was determined by real-time PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal control. ***p < 0.01 compared to the control. (C) OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells were treated with 20 μM quinacrine for 2 h, and then cycloheximide (CHX) was added at 50 μg/ml. Cells were collected at the indicated time points for Western blotting.

We further investigated whether the elevated DR5 protein level is due to increased production or reduced degradation. We treated OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells with quinacrine at indicated concentrations for 8 h. DR5 mRNA levels were significantly induced in OVCAR-8 and A2780 cells by quinacrine (Figure 3B). In the meantime, we tested the half-life of DR5 protein in these cells. Once protein synthesis was blocked by cycloheximide (CHX), DR5 protein decreased rapidly within 1–2 h. However, quinacrine stabilized DR5 protein level without significant decrease in up to 8 h tested (Figure 3C). These data indicate that quinacrine is a unique agent that can not only increase DR5 production by activating mRNA transcription but also block protein degradation.

Quinacrine Induces Subcellular Localization Change of DR5 and Accumulation in Lysosomes

To track DR5 in the cells, we constructed a retroviral vector, pBabe/Puro/DR5-EGFP, expressing a fragment from amino acid 1–334 with the death domain deleted, fused with EGFP, and codon optimized for better expression in mammalian cells. Cancer cells infected with the retrovirus carrying DR5-EGFP and selected by puromycin showed weak expression of DR5 on the cell surface with rare intracellular deposits visualized under a laser microscope. After treatment with quinacrine for as little as 1 h, intracellular deposits of DR5-EGFP manifested as bright dots or vesicular structures increased significantly (Figure 4A). We counterstained the cells with an antibody against lysosomal membrane marker LAMP-2 (lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2) and confirmed quinacrine-induced DR5 localization in lysosomes (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Quinacrine induces LMP and DR5 accumulation in lysosome. (A) OVCAR-8 expressed with DR5-EGFP was treated with 15 μM quinacrine for 2, 4, 8 h. Left, confocal images. Scan bar, 20 μm. Right, quantified fluorescence intensity. Quantification of the fluorescent intensity was performed using Image J. ***p < 0.001. All experiments were performed at least three times, reproducible. (B) Colocalization of DR5 and Lamp-2 was observed after treatment with 15 μM quinacrine for 4 h in A2780 cells. Scan bar, 20 μm. (C) Quinacrine induces LMP after 4 h as indicated by aggregated galectin-3 puncta (red, middle) in A2780. Quinacrine is a fluoresced chemical visualized in green under a laser microscope (left panel). Colocalization of quinacrine and galectin-3 puncta in lysosome (right panel). The image below is an enlargement of framed image above. Scan bar, 20 μm.

As fluoresce of EGFP is usually quenched in an acidic environment such as in lysosomes, the bright green signal of DR5-EGFP accumulation indicates elevated pH in lysosomes. One of the major causes of pH elevation in lysosome is lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP). To assess whether quinacrine treatment led to LMP, we constructed a lentivirus vector expressing galectin-3 fused with mCherry at the N-terminus, codon optimized for optimized expression in mammalian cells, and overexpressed in A2780 cells. We treated the cells with quinacrine and then visualized the expression pattern of galectin-3, which is normally diffused in the cytoplasm and nucleus but translocates to leaky lysosomes rapidly to form visible puncta when LMP takes place (25). We found that at as early as 1 h after treatment with quinacrine, mCherry-galectin-3 puncta were visualized (Figure 4C). Quinacrine is a fluoresced chemical, which is known to be intercalative to DNA and lysosomotropic to lysosome as shown in the left panel of Figure 4C, colocalized with gelactin-3 puncta in lysosomes (right panel). Therefore, we hypothesized that quinacrine blocks lysosomal degradation of DR5, and possibly other components of DISC, likely by inducing LMP. Lysosomal degradation of death receptors and its role in extrinsic apoptotic pathways require further investigation.

Anti-tumor Effect of Quinacrine in Combination With TRIAL in Ovarian Cancer Xenograft Model

We chose ovarian cancer for our in vivo study because of its unique feature of local spreading within abdomen and pelvis and practical intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapeutics that has been proved more effective than systemic delivery under certain circumstances. After treatment, we detected minimum bioluminescence in the group of mice treated with quinacrine and TRAIL, while mice treated with quinacrine or TRAIL alone showed no difference compared to the vehicle control group (Figure 5A, one representative mouse from each group; Figure 5B, bioluminescent intensity captured on day 5). Treatment was repeated with an additional cycle to each group and then subjected to observation. Mice in control group, and groups of quinacrine alone and TRAIL alone died in about 8 weeks (Figure 5C), however, mice treated with combination of TRAIL and quinacrine survived for 20 weeks without tumor growth when they were euthanized.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Quinacrine overcome TRAIL resistance in vivo. A2780-luc cells were injected into the peritoneum of NSG mice, 5 × 106 cells/mouse, on day −5. Five days after inoculation, mice were imaged on day 0 using the Lago X system. Mice were treated with intraperitoneal injection of quinacrine at 50 mg/kg on day 1 and TRAIL at 10 mg/kg on day 1, 2, 3, and 4. On day 5, mice were reimaged. (A) Bioluminescent images of one representative mouse of each group before and after treatment. (B) Bioluminescence signal of intraperitoneal tumors treated for 4 weeks compared with pretreated tumors (data are means ± S.D.; n = 5, ***p < 0.001). (C) Kaplan-Meier survival of mice with different treatment (n = 5/group).

Discussion

Ovarian cancer (epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer) (26) is the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death of women in the US with an estimated 22,530 new cases and 13,980 deaths in 2019 (American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019). Due to lack of an effective screening test (27), ovarian cancer typically presents at a later stage (Stage III or IV) and one third of patients have malignant ascites at initial presentation (28). Current treatment of ovarian cancer is primarily limited to surgery and chemotherapy (NCCN guidelines). Five-year survival is ~47.6% in the United States (SEER Cancer Statistics Review). Thus, new treatments are urgently needed to help patients suffering from this deadly disease.

Quinacrine, introduced in the 1920's, was originally used for malaria treatment and prophylaxis (29, 30), treatment of giardiasis (31), lupus (32), rheumatoid arthritis (33), and for female sterilization (34). Quinacrine was initially developed as an oral drug absorbed in the gastrointestinal track that accumulates in liver with a concentration 20,000 times higher than that of plasma (35). An injectable formulation of quinacrine was developed in the United States in 1964, which was approved for treatment of ascites associated with various cancers (36, 37); but drug marketing was discontinued in 1977, and the NDA (New Drug Application) was withdrawn in 2003 (38, 39).

Most recently, quinacrine emerged as a potential anti-cancer agent. Quinacrine is actively involved in multiple signaling pathways including apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, autophagy, and arachidonic acid metabolism (29, 30) by targeting p53 (17, 40), DR5 (16, 41), MCL-1 (16, 42), NFkB (40), and others in cancer cells. The anti-cancer effects of quinacrine have been tested in various preclinical cancer models (4346). Quinacrine by itself administered either by oral gavage or intraperitoneal delivery has shown limited anticancer effects in animal models. It shows more or less synergistic effective in combination with other anticancer agents in tumor suppression (42) or survival prolongation (47). Clinical trials using quinacrine as a single agent or in combination with other therapeutics are ongoing in various cancers [colorectal cancer [NCT01844076], prostate cancer [NCT00417274], non-small cell lung cancer [NCT01839955], renal cancer [NCT00574483], and thyroid cancer (42)]. Overall, quinacrine is well-tolerated with well-established pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in human subjects (48, 49). The question remains how we can step forward to make use of this multi-target, bioactive agent for cancer treatment.

Based on our previous findings that quinacrine can significantly induce DR5 protein levels and synergize with TRAIL to induce apoptosis (16), we combined quinacrine with TRAIL and investigated the antitumor activity of this drug combination in ovarian cancer models. We confirmed synergism between TRAIL and quinacrine in all ovarian cancer cell lines tested, including TRAIL-sensitive (SK-OV-3 and OVCAR-4) and TRAIL resistant (A2780 and OVCAR-8) cells. We further investigated the mechanism of quinacrine-induced DR5 accumulation and found that not only can quinacrine induce significant high levels of DR5 mRNA but can also block DR5 degradation evidenced by significantly prolonged DR5 half-life in quinacrine-treated cells. From a mechanistic standpoint, quinacrine is therefore superior to other DR5 inducers that enhance DR5 mRNA (DNA-damaging agents activate DR5 transcription dependent of p53 (50, 51) or reduce DR5 degradation [by proteasomal inhibitors (52)]. We also found that quinacrine induces DR5 subcellular localization changes and accumulates in lysosomes—an observation that warrants further investigation of the metabolism of death receptor and death signaling. Our preliminary data show that quinacrine induces LMP (lysosomal membrane permeabilization) as indicated by aggregation of galectin-3.

The anti-cancer effects of quinacrine in combination with TRAIL in ovarian cancer xenograft models we observed are extraordinary. Two cycles of one dose of quinacrine (50 mg/kg) followed by four doses of TRAIL (10 mg/kg) resulted in mice that were cancer free for 20 weeks when euthanized while all other mice (vehicle control, quinacrine alone, and TRAIL alone) died ~8 weeks after cancer cell inoculation. No therapeutic effect of TRAIL or quinacrine alone was observed at the doses delivered in our experiments. The remarkable synergistic effect we observed may be partly explained by the route of administration—intraperitoneal injection of quinacrine and TRAIL, instead of oral delivery and systemic injection, respectively, which we hypothesize may lead to longer exposure of cancer cells to therapeutic agents in higher concentrations within the peritoneum.

Intraperitoneal delivery of therapeutics in the adjuvant setting is a practical approach and has been exclusively practiced as an effective way to treat ovarian cancer allowing close contact of tumor cells with therapeutic agents at higher concentrations in the peritoneal cavity, which is the principle site of spread and recurrence of ovarian cancer (53, 54). It has been shown that intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin or carboplatin on day 1, and intraperitoneal paclitaxel on day 8 every 21 days for 6 cycles for stage II, III, or IV ovarian cancer patients who obtained optimal surgical debulking showed significant prolonged overall survival (55). In our experiments, intraperitoneal delivery of quinacrine and TRAIL showed significant therapeutic efficacy to eliminate cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity.

In summary, we show that intraperitoneal delivery of quinacrine and TRAIL is rational and practical with remarkable synergistic anti-cancer effects in preclinical models of ovarian cancer. Clinical investigation of combining quinacrine TRAIL for ovarian cancer treatment is warranted.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics Statement

This animal study was reviewed and approved by City of Hope IACUC.

Author Contributions

RL: design and carry out most of the laboratory work and drafted the manuscript. YY: LMP assay and animal work. GW: TRAIL purification and animal work. EY: revise work of figures and manuscript. GY: animal work. XQ and LZ: tissue culture and cytotoxicity assay. YW: TRAIL expression vector construction and purification. TZ: design of the work and critical input in interpretation of the work. YZ: critical input and analysis and interpretation of data for the work. EW: substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, draft, revise, and finalize the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. K12CA001727. This content was solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. RL was a visiting scholar at City of Hope, supported by Jiangsu Overseas Visiting Scholar Program for University Prominent Young & Middle-aged Teachers and Presidents, Suzhou Applied Basic Research Program (No. SYSD2019082), Scientific and Technological Innovation Team Building Program of Suzhou Vocational Health College (No. SZWZYTD201801), and the Science and Technology Project of Suzhou Vocational Health College (No. szwzy201709).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nicola Welch, Ph.D., CMPP for editorial assistance and critical review of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.01118/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1. Combination index of TRAIL and quinacrine in SK-OV-3, OVCAR-4, OVCAR-8, and A2780 cell lines as calculated by CompuSyn software. Synergy, additivity, and antagonism are defined as CI < 1, CI = 1, and CI > 1, respectively.

References

1. Ashkenazi A. Targeting the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in cancer: lessons learned and future directions. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125:487–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI80420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Arcaini L, Dulanermin in indolent lymphomas: an ineffective approach. Lancet Haematol. (2015) 2:e136–7. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00044-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, Din WS, Huang CP, Nicholl JK, et al. Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity. (1995) 3:673–82. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90057-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kelley SK, Harris LA, Xie D, Deforge L, Totpal K, Bussiere J, et al. Preclinical studies to predict the disposition of Apo2L/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in humans: characterization of in vivo efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2001) 299:31–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

5. Ashkenazi A, Holland P, Eckhardt SG. Ligand-based targeting of apoptosis in cancer: the potential of recombinant human apoptosis ligand 2/tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (rhApo2L/TRAIL). J Clin Oncol. (2008) 26:3621–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Herbst RS, Eckhardt SG, Kurzrock R, Ebbinghaus S, O'Dwyer PJ, Gordon MS, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of recombinant human Apo2L/TRAIL, a dual proapoptotic receptor agonist, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2010) 28:2839–46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.1991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cheah CY, Belada D, Fanale MA, Janikova A, Czucman MS, Flinn IW, et al. Dulanermin with rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma: an open-label phase 1b/2 randomised study. Lancet Haematol. (2015) 2:e166–74. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00026-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wainberg ZA, Messersmith WA, Peddi PF, Kapp AV, Ashkenazi A, Royer-Joo S, et al. A phase 1B study of dulanermin in combination with modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. (2013) 12:248–54. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2013.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Soria JC, Mark Z, Zatloukal P, Szima B, Albert I, Juhasz E, et al. Randomized phase II study of dulanermin in combination with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2011) 29:4442–51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ouyang X, Shi M, Jie F, Bai Y, Shen P, Yu Z, et al. Phase III study of dulanermin (recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand/Apo2 ligand) combined with vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. (2018) 36:315–22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0536-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Thome M, Schneider P, Hofmann K, Fickenscher H, Meinl E, Neipel F, et al. Viral FLICE-inhibitory proteins (FLIPs) prevent apoptosis induced by death receptors. Nature. (1997) 386:517–21. doi: 10.1038/386517a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mert U, Sanlioglu AD. Intracellular localization of DR5 and related regulatory pathways as a mechanism of resistance to TRAIL in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2017) 74:245–55. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2321-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wu GS, Burns TF, McDonald ER, 3rd, Jiang W, Meng R, Krantz ID, et al. KILLER/DR5 is a DNA damage-inducible p53-regulated death receptor gene. Nat Genet. (1997) 17:141–3. doi: 10.1038/ng1097-141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bao YX, Zhao XD, Deng HB, Lu CL, Guo Y, Lu X, et al. Schedule-dependent cytotoxicity of sunitinib and TRAIL in human non-small cell lung cancer cells with or without EGFR and KRAS mutations. Cell Oncol. (2016) 39:343–52. doi: 10.1007/s13402-016-0278-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hendriks D, He Y, Koopmans I, Wiersma VR, van Ginkel RJ, Samplonius DF, et al. Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-targeted TRAIL combines PD-L1-mediated checkpoint inhibition with TRAIL-mediated apoptosis induction. Oncoimmunology. (2016) 5:e1202390. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1202390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wang W, Gallant JN, Katz SI, Dolloff NG, Smith CD, Abdulghani J, et al. Quinacrine sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to TRAIL and chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Biol Therapy. (2011) 12:229–38. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.3.17033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wang W, Ho WC, Dicker DT, MacKinnon C, Winkler JD, Marmorstein R, et al. Acridine derivatives activate p53 and induce tumor cell death through Bax. Cancer Biol Therapy. (2005) 4:893–8. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.8.2134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang W, Kim SH, El-Deiry WS. Small-molecule modulators of p53 family signaling and antitumor effects in p53-deficient human colon tumor xenografts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:11003–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604507103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gallant JN, Allen JE, Smith CD, Dicker DT, Wang W, Dolloff NG, et al. Quinacrine synergizes with 5-fluorouracil and other therapies in colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Therapy. (2011) 12:239–51. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.3.17034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chou TC. Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. Cancer Res. (2010) 70:440–6. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kim SH, Kim K, Kwagh JG, Dicker DT, Herlyn M, Rustgi AK, et al. Death induction by recombinant native TRAIL and its prevention by a caspase 9 inhibitor in primary human esophageal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:40044–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404541200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Chou TC, Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul. (1984) 22:27–55. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(84)90007-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Graczyk PP. Caspase inhibitors as anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic agents. Prog Med Chem. (2002) 39:1–72. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6468(08)70068-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. O'Connor PM, Jackman J, Bae I, Myers TG, Fan S, Mutoh M, Kohn KW, et al. Characterization of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in cell lines of the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screen and correlations with the growth-inhibitory potency of 123 anticancer agents. Cancer Res. (1997) 57:4285–300.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

25. Aits S, Kricker J, Liu B, Ellegaard AM, Hamalisto S, Tvingsholm S, et al. Sensitive detection of lysosomal membrane permeabilization by lysosomal galectin puncta assay. Autophagy. (2015) 11:1408–24. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1063871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. PDQ Board ATE. Ovarian Epithelial. Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer Treatment (PDQ®): Health Professional Version, PDQ Cancer Information Summaries. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute (US) (2002).

Google Scholar

27. Nebgen DR, Lu KH, Bast RC. Jr. Novel approaches to ovarian cancer screening. Curr Oncol Rep. (2019) 21:75. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0816-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Oien DB, Pathoulas CL, Ray U, Thirusangu P, Kalogera E, Shridhar V. Repurposing quinacrine for treatment-refractory cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.09.021. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Gurova K. New hopes from old drugs: revisiting DNA-binding small molecules as anticancer agents. Future Oncol. (2009) 5:1685–704. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Escobedo AA, Hanevik K, Almirall P, Cimerman S, Alfonso M. Management of chronic Giardia infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. (2014) 12:1143–57. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.942283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Grammer AC, Ryals MM, Heuer SE, Robl RD, Madamanchi S, Davis LS, et al. Drug repositioning in SLE: crowd-sourcing, literature-mining and big data analysis. Lupus. (2016) 25:1150–70. doi: 10.1177/0961203316657437

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wallace DJ. The use of quinacrine (Atabrine) in rheumatic diseases: a reexamination. Semin Arthritis Rheu. (1989) 18:282–96. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(89)90050-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lippes J. Quinacrine sterilization (QS): time for reconsideration. Contraception. (2015) 92:91–5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ehsanian R, Van Waes C, Feller SM. Beyond DNA binding - a review of the potential mechanisms mediating quinacrine's therapeutic activities in parasitic infections, inflammation, and cancers. Cell Commun Signal. (2011) 9:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-9-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Lee M, Boyes DA. The use of quinacrine hydrochloride for the control of malignant serous effusions. J Obstetr Gynaecol Br Commonw. (1971) 78:843–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb00350.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ultmann JE, Gellhorn A, Osnos M, Hirschberg E. The effect of quinacrine on neoplastic effusions and certain of their enzymes. Cancer. (1963) 16:283–8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196303)16:3<283::aid-cncr2820160303>3.0.co;2-j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Food and Drug Administration. Eli Lilly and Co. et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 80 New Drug Applications and 75 Abbreviated New Drug Applications (Docket 2003N-0335). Federal Register (2003). p. 49481–8.

Google Scholar

39. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Summary of a Kit for Intrauterine Insertion of Quinacrine Hydrochloride Pellets for Female Sterilization (1998).

Google Scholar

40. Gurova KV, Hill JE, Guo C, Prokvolit A, Burdelya LG, Samoylova E, et al. Small molecules that reactivate p53 in renal cell carcinoma reveal a NF-kappaB-dependent mechanism of p53 suppression in tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2005) 102:17448–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508888102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Das S, Tripathi N, Preet R, Siddharth S, Nayak A, Bharatam PV, et al. Quinacrine induces apoptosis in cancer cells by forming a functional bridge between TRAIL-DR5 complex and modulating the mitochondrial intrinsic cascade. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:248–67. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Abdulghani J, Gokare P, Gallant JN, Dicker D, Whitcomb T, Cooper T, et al. Sorafenib and quinacrine target anti-apoptotic protein MCL1: a poor prognostic marker in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (ATC). Clin Cancer Res. (2016) 22:6192–203. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2792

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Preet R, Mohapatra P, Mohanty S, Sahu SK, Choudhuri T, Wyatt MD, et al. Quinacrine has anticancer activity in breast cancer cells through inhibition of topoisomerase activity. Int J Cancer. (2012) 130:1660–70. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kim HG, Kim CW, Lee DH, Lee JS, Oh ET, Park HJ. Quinacrine-mediated inhibition of Nrf2 reverses hypoxia-induced 5-fluorouracil resistance in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:4366. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Jung D, Khurana A, Roy D, Kalogera E, Bakkum-Gamez J, Chien J, et al. Quinacrine upregulates p21/p27 independent of p53 through autophagy-mediated downregulation of p62-Skp2 axis in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:2487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20531-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kalogera E, Roy D, Khurana A, Mondal S, Weaver AL, He X, et al. Quinacrine in endometrial cancer: repurposing an old antimalarial drug. Gynecol Oncol. (2017) 146:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.04.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Eriksson A, Chantzi E, Fryknas M, Gullbo J, Nygren P, Gustafsson M, et al. Towards repositioning of quinacrine for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia - promising synergies and in vivo effects. Leuk Res. (2017) 63:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Bhateja P, Dowlati A, Sharma N. Phase I study of the combination of quinacrine and erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. (2018) 36:435–41. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0515-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Brocks DR, Mehvar R. Stereoselectivity in the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the chiral antimalarial drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet. (2003) 42:1359–82. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342150-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Meng RD, El-Deiry WS. p53-independent upregulation of KILLER/DR5 TRAIL receptor expression by glucocorticoids and interferon-gamma. Exp Cell Res. (2001) 262:154–69. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.5073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Takimoto R, El-Deiry WS. Wild-type p53 transactivates the KILLER/DR5 gene through an intronic sequence-specific DNA-binding site. Oncogene. (2000) 19:1735–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203489

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Gras Navarro. Espedal H, Joseph JV, Trachsel-Moncho L, Bahador M, Gjertsen BT, Kristoffersen EK, et al. Pretreatment of glioblastoma with bortezomib potentiates natural killer cell cytotoxicity through TRAIL/DR5 mediated apoptosis and prolongs animal survival. Cancers. (2019) 11:996. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070996

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Kyang LS, Alzahrani NA, Valle SJ, Rahman MK, Arrowaili A, Liauw W, et al. Long-term survival outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: single-institutional experience with 1225 cases. J Surg Oncol. (2019) 120:794–802. doi: 10.1002/jso.25642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. (2006) 354:34–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Krasner CN, Castro C, Penson RT, Roche M, Matulonis UA, Morgan MA, et al. Final report on serial phase II trials of all-intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced carcinoma of Mullerian origin. Gynecol Oncol. (2019) 153:223–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: quinacrine, TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing Ligand/Apo2L), DR5, ovarian cancer, lysosomal permeabilization, intraperitoneal (IP), xenograft animal model

Citation: Liang R, Yao Y, Wang G, Yue E, Yang G, Qi X, Wang Y, Zhao L, Zheng T, Zhang Y and Wenge Wang E (2020) Repositioning Quinacrine Toward Treatment of Ovarian Cancer by Rational Combination With TRAIL. Front. Oncol. 10:1118. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01118

Received: 29 January 2020; Accepted: 04 June 2020;
Published: 16 July 2020.

Edited by:

Wafik S. El-Deiry, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, United States

Reviewed by:

Gen Sheng Wu, Wayne State University School of Medicine, United States
Jean-Nicolas Gallant, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States

Copyright © 2020 Liang, Yao, Wang, Yue, Yang, Qi, Wang, Zhao, Zheng, Zhang and Wenge Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Edward Wenge Wang, edwang@coh.org

These authors have contributed equally to this work