Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolases and Human Malignancies: The Novel Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications for Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs), a subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), have been found in a variety of tumor entities and play distinct roles in the pathogenesis and development of various cancers including head and neck cancer (HNC). HNC is a heterogeneous disease arising from the mucosal epithelia of the upper aerodigestive tract, including different anatomic sites, distinct histopathologic types, as well as human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and negative subgroups. Despite advances in multi-disciplinary treatment for HNC, the long-term survival rate of patients with HNC remains low. Emerging evidence has revealed the members of UCHs are associated with the pathogenesis and clinical prognosis of HNC, which highlights the prognostic and therapeutic implications of UCHs for patients with HNC. In this review, we summarize the physiological and pathological functions of the UCHs family, which provides enlightenment of potential mechanisms of UCHs family in HNC pathogenesis and highlights the potential consideration of UCHs as attractive drug targets.

Introduction

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents the seventh most prevalent human malignancies with an annual incidence of 890,000 new cases worldwide, including 76,000 cases in China and 18,260 cases in Germany (1, 2). Anatomically, HNC occurs at distinct sites including lip, oral cavity, nasal cavity, sinonasal cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and salivary glands, and etiologic risk factors, epidemiology, treatment strategies as well as clinical outcome differ among individual subsites (3). Over 90% of cases are diagnosed as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which arises from the mucosal epithelia of the upper aerodigestive tract. High incidence areas for oral cavity cancer include Middle and South Asia, Western and Southern Europe as well as South Africa. The incidence of oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC) is elevated in Europe and North America. Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is most common in East and Southeast Asia, especially in South China (4). Tobacco smoking and heavy alcohol consumption have been identified as the most important risk factors in developed countries (5). In developing countries, risk factors also include EpsteinBarr virus (EBV) infection for NPC, areca nut chewing, consumption of preserved foods, and oral hygiene (6–8). During the past two decades, the overall incidence of HNSCC has gradually decreased in western developed countries. However, a subgroup of HNSCC, particularly OPSCC, has been becoming more prevalent in young adults, which is attributed to high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, predominantly HPV16 (9). High-risk HPV types comprise two oncogenes, E6 and E7, which inactivate the tumor suppressors p53 and retinoblastoma (RB), respectively. As a result, cell cycle progression and cell death in infected cells are disrupted, as initial steps for HPV-related carcinogenesis (10–13). Besides the viral oncogenes E6/E7, HPV E2, E4, and E5 have been shown to facilitate the synergistic effects of viral oncogenesis, which represents an alternative manner to HPV-induced carcinogenesis (14). It has been well-established that HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC have distinct differences in gene expression profiles, genomic alterations, immune landscape, as well as clinical outcomes (15–18). Due to the more favorable prognosis of HPV-positive OPSCC, clinical trials have been launched to investigate HPV-stratified de-escalation treatment based on currently established protocols. However, final results and definitive conclusions are pending, which might improve the post-treatment quality of HPV-related OPSCC patients (19–22).

Despite advances in multi-disciplinary treatment for HNSCC, including surgical approaches, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the overall survival of advanced HNSCC has only improved slightly, and appropriate therapy remains a major challenge. Over the past decade, large-scale genomic profiling and proteomic studies, including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) projects, have highlighted a comprehensive molecular landscape of changes in DNA copy number, somatic mutations, promoter methylation, and protein and gene expression, indicating the critical components and signal pathway in HNSCC pathogenesis (23–25). A better understanding of these molecular underpinnings may inspire novel drug targets as well as molecular biomarkers for personalized treatment.

The proteome is exceedingly complex and has been regarded as the major driver or actuator of fundamental cellular processes. Protein ubiquitination is a post-translational modification process that plays critical roles in numerous biological processes, including cell growth and differentiation, signal transduction, DNA repair, and oncogenesis (26). The conjugation of ubiquitin (Ub) to target proteins is catalyzed by a cascade of ubiquitinating enzymes, including Ub-activating enzymes (E1s), Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and Ub ligases (E3s). Conjugation of Ub to a substrate lysine, its lysines or its N-terminus, results in the generation of different substrate ubiquitin structures, which can be either a mono- or poly-ubiquitylation process and allows targeted proteins to fulfill a diverse range of functions. However, protein ubiquitination is highly reversible. Deubiquitinases or deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) catalyze the removal of ubiquitin from target proteins to generate free monomeric Ub (27). The human genome encodes approximately 100 DUBs categorized into six subfamilies: the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs), the ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs), the ovarian tumor proteases (OTUs), the Josephin or Machado-Joseph disease protein domain proteases (MJDs), the Jab1/MPN domain-associated metalloisopeptidase (JAMM), and the monocyte chemotactic protein-induced protein family (MCPIP) (27). Among these families, UBPs are mostly described to date, with 60 proteases in humans, which have been well-reviewed by a range of publications (28–31). Recent studies have revealed the emerging functions of UCHs in the pathogenesis and progression of human malignancies. However, few studies on UCHs in HNC are available. One member of UCHs family, BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1), was identified to be associated with poor outcome following radiation in HPV-negative HNSCC clinical sample by proteomic and transcriptomic analysis (32). Moreover, another member of UCHs family, UCHL1 was demonstrated as a tumor suppressor gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (33). In this review, we systematically summarize the physiological and pathological functions of the UCHs family in human malignancies, providing enlightenment on potential mechanisms of UCHs family in HNC pathogenesis and the potential consideration of UCHs as novel promising drug targets.

Structures and Functions of UCHs

Among DUBs family, molecular structures of UCHs were the first to be characterized. Four UCHs in humans have been identified: UCHL1/PGP9.5 (protein gene product 9.5), UCHL3, UCHL5/UCH37, and BAP1. All UCHs share a core catalytic domain with 230 amino acids and close homology among family members. They comprise a confined loop that cleaves short ubiquitylated peptides (up to 20–30 amino acids) from the C-terminal glycine residue (Figure 1).

Figure 1

UCHL1

First identified as a member of UCHs family in the 1980s, UCHL1 is an abundant neuronal protein containing only one UCH domain with very short N- and C- terminal extensions. It possesses one of the most complicated protein knotted structure, which is regarded to protect UCHs from degradation in the proteasome as well as to maintain proper proteasomal function. Besides its DUB function in the recycling of free Ub, UCHL1 is also known to have a ubiquitin ligase activity as a mono-Ub stabilizer by preventing its degradation (34). It was reported that the generation rate of monomeric Ub by UCHL1 in vitro is enhanced by the catalytic residues C90 and H161 (35). Analysis of the crystal structure suggests that UCHL1 preferentially binds monomeric or small adducts of Ub, but does not act on large polymers of Ub (36). Therefore, UCHL1 has the potential for numerous ubiquitination-dependent biological processes.

UCHL1 is predominantly expressed in the brain, where it comprises up to 5% of total neuronal proteins. Although the precise function of UCHL1 is not fully clarified in many pathological processes, better understandings of functional UCHL1 has been largely reported in neuronal dysfunction and neurodegenerative disorders (34, 37–39). For instance, the specific distribution and activity of UCHL1 in human tissues has the potential clinical significance for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), might be a major target of reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage (40). Although most cases of PD are sporadic, a small subgroup of PD has been linked to specific genomic mutations (41). Interestingly, The I93M point mutation in UCHL1 has been reported to be associated with PD susceptibility by decreasing hydrolytic activity (42). By contrast, an S18Y variation in UCHL1 shows a protective enzyme with a reduced risk of PD by a reduction of α-synuclein (43). A study has shown that modification of the UCHL1 C152 site decreases injury to gray and white matter, resulting in the recovery of motor function after middle cerebral artery occlusion (44). Another potential feature of UCHL1 is an ATP-independent E3 ligase activity, which promotes Lys63 (K63) polyubiquitination of α-synuclein (34). Moreover, UCHL1 was demonstrated as a novel interactor and substrate of PD linked E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase parkin by the autophagy-lysosome pathway (45).

It has also been reported at much lower levels in kidney, breast epithelium, and reproductive tissues (46, 47), and to be expressed context-dependent in individual cells, such as human fibroblasts during wound healing (48). Uniform cytoplasmic staining of UCHL1 was observed in neurons, but UCHL1 can translocate into the nucleus and regulate microtubule dynamics (49). Although it is absent in most other normal tissues, UCHL1 appears to be aberrantly expressed in many non-neuronal tumors, including breast, prostate, colorectal, gastric, head and neck, and pancreatic ductal carcinomas (33, 50–55). The functions and potential mechanisms of UCHL1 in tumorigenesis have been reviewed by several excellent publications (56, 57). The interactive proteins with UCHL1 as well as other UCH family members in human malignancies are summarized in Table 1. In addition, altered expression levels of UCHs in various cancers have also been reviewed in Table 2.

Recent findings have revealed significant functions for UCHL1 in immune response and regulation. UCHL1 was found in mouse kidney, spleen, and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, and its expression and activity were strongly regulated by the immune stimuli LPS and IFN-γ (113). UCHL1 modulates antigen processing by affecting the colocalization of intracellular MHC I with late endosomal/lysosomal compartments necessary for cross priming of CD8 T cells (113). Interestingly, an induced UCHL1 expression was also demonstrated in multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) upon stimulation with proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ plus TNF-α, and negatively regulated the immunosuppressive capacity and survival of MSC. This discovery may provide potential MSC-based immunotherapy for inflammatory diseases by modulation of UCHL1 (114).

UCHL3

UCHL3 and UCHL1 have significant structural similarity. However, the biological characteristics of UCHL3 are quite distinct concerning expression patterns and ligase activity. Unlike UCHL1, which is mainly restricted to neuronal and neurosecretory tissues, UCHL3 is more widely expressed throughout mammalian tissues. Interestingly, UCHL3 hardly exhibits ligase activity, while its hydrolytic activity is two-hundred-fold higher than UCHL1 toward a fluorogenic ubiquitin C-terminal amide (34). It was reported that UCHL3 enables to cleave the C-terminus of NEDD8, which is a ubiquitin-like protein that exerts the function of Ub to be conjugated to a lysine residue of the substrate (115). Next, UCHL3 has also been demonstrated to alleviate cryptorchid-induced germ cell apoptosis in gad mice. UCHL3 appears to have dual affinities for ubiquitin and Nedd8, and function as a deNEDDylating enzyme in vivo, suggesting that UCHL3 plays a critical role in germ cell apoptosis (116). Several studies using similar UCHL3 knockout mouse models revealed the significant functions in photoreceptor cell degeneration, neurodegeneration, fertilization and embryogenesis, stress responses in skeletal muscle, diet-induced obesity, and osteoblast differentiation (117–122). It is worth mentioning that level of UCHL3 protein in several neurodegenerative diseases is unchanged, while it hydrolyzes the C-terminal extension of a mutant ubiquitin (UBB⁺¹), contributing to the role in neurodegenerative disorders (123).

An increasing number of studies have demonstrated vital functions of UCHL3 on tumorigenesis, including breast, prostate, ovarian, and non-small cell lung cancer (Table 2) (50, 74, 101, 102). Luo et al. found that UCHL3 deubiquitinates RAD51 and subsequently facilitates RAD51-BRCA2 interaction, which is critical for homologous recombination (HR) and contributes to therapeutic resistance in breast cancer (75). By contrast, UCHL3 is reduced in metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, and knockdown of UCHL3 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), contributing to cancer cell invasion and metastasis (102). In contrast, high UCHL3 expression was reported in ovarian cancer and predicted a worse clinical outcome. The elevated UCHL3 facilitates carcinogenesis and enhances inflammation by deubiquitinating and stabilizing TNF Receptor Associated Factor 2 (TRAF2) (74). Taken together, the UCHL3 function in cancer remains controversial, suggesting the roles of UCHL3 is complicated and context-dependent in individual tumor types.

UCH37

UCH37 (also known as UCHL5) was identified first as a 19S-associated deubiquitinating enzyme in the 1990s, which comprises a C-terminal extension (residues 227-329) in addition to an N-terminal UCH domain (residues 1–226) (124). It is specific for the distal subunit of Lys48-linked poly-Ub chains. Isolated full-length UCH37 displays weak catalytic activity due to autonomic inhibition by the C-terminal extension (125). The proteolytic activity requires a Ub receptor called ADRM1 (named hRpn13 in humans) binding to UCH37 via its C-terminal 46 residues (also called the KEKE motif) (125). In addition, hRpn13 was found to directly enhance the de-ubiquitination activity of UCH37 in vitro (125–127). The hRpn13-UCH37 complex hydrolyzes large Ub conjugates with incorporation into the 19S complex. By contrast, UCH37 is inhibited by the chromatin remodeling complex component INO80G mediated by the N-terminal domain of NFRKB (nuclear factor related to κB, NFRKB) (128). Rpn13 and INO80G share a conserved deubiquitinase adaptor (DEUBAD) domain that interacts with the C-terminal of UCH37, revealing conformational plasticity to regulate deubiquitinating activity on or off, respectively (128). Functionally, UCH37 is reported to perform a crucial role in certain protein-protein interactions involving several physiological and pathological processes, including development, cell proliferation, and apoptosis, hippocampal synaptic plasticity, Alzheimer’s disease, pulmonary fibrosis, as well as human malignancies (26, 129–133).

Wicks and colleagues reported UCH37 interacts with Smad7 to control TGF-β/Smad signaling activity, suggesting that UCH37-mediated deubiquitination might contribute to tumorigenesis (134). The first direct evidence of UCH37 in cancer study was described by a chemistry-based functional proteomics approach in cervical carcinoma. Activity profiling showed UCH37 is induced in the majority of carcinoma tissues and HPV E6/E7 immortalized human keratinocytes, indicating a significant role of UCH37 in tumor transformation (103). Subsequently, an increasing number of studies reported the potential functions in tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion, as well as clinical implications (Table 2) (76–78, 135–138).

BAP1

The BAP1 protein consists of 729 amino acids that are encoded by the BAP1 gene located on human chromosome 3p21.1. BAP1 protein was identified as a nuclear-localized DUB. In addition to the N-terminal UCH domain, BAP1 comprises a long C-terminal extension (Figure 1). BAP1 was originally found to interact with the RING finger domain of BRCA1 and to perform the cell growth-suppressive function. BAP1 is also involved in chromatin modification and transcription by deubiquitinating lysine residues in HCF1 and YY1. Both recruit histone-modifying complexes and regulate expression of numerous genes involved in multiple physiological processes (139). Moreover, BAP1 interacts with the transcription factor FOXK1/K2 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, which represses FOXK2-target genes forming a ternary protein complex in which BAP1 bridges FoxK2 and HCF-1. Loss of BAP1 causes the increase of FoxK2 target genes, which is dependent on the Ring1B-Bmi1 complex (140).

Polycomb group proteins exert critical roles in transcriptional regulation, which contributes to a variety of physiological processes, including embryonic development, differentiation, and self-renewal. Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs) are responsible for histone ubiquitination and methylation (139). BAP1 interacts with additional sex combs like 1 (ASXL1), forming a polycomb group repressive deubiquitinase complex (PR-DUB). The transcriptional function is regulated through histones modification via ubiquitination by PRCs and deubiquitination by PR-DUB. Thus BAP1 deficiency significantly alters ubiquitination level of histone 2A, leading to the dysregulation of cell cycle and cellular senescence (141). A recent study found cytoplasm BAP1 localizes at the ER, where it regulates type 3 inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R3), modulating calcium (Ca²⁺) release from the endoplasmic reticulum into the cytosol and mitochondria, promoting apoptosis, which plays a critical role in cellular transformation (92). Another study has identified cystine transporter SLC7A11 as a critical BAP1 target gene in human malignancies, which was repressed by BAP1, causing increasing lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis (95).

BAP1 functions as a tumor suppressor through chromatin modulation, transcriptional regulation, cell cycle control, cellular differentiation, and DNA damage repair (142). Loss or mutation of BAP1 gene is a common event in cancer and serves as a potential pathogenetic mechanism in various human malignancies, including uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, small cell and non-small cell lung carcinomas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), breast cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (Table 2) (107, 143–148). Tumors associated with BAP1 somatic mutations have already been discussed in recent reviews (139, 149). Other alterations in the BAP1 gene have been reported, such as large deletions of exons causing premature protein termination, frameshift mutation, splice site mutations, and base substitutions-induced nonsense and missense mutations (143, 149). BAP1 acts as a tumor suppressor depending on both deubiquitination activity interfered by missense mutations and loss of nuclear localization signal by truncating mutations. Furthermore, several studies showed that BAP1 loss or modification is associated with different tumor phenotypes and clinical outcomes (108, 110, 150–152). For example, BAP1-mutated mesothelioma is significantly correlated with female predominance, younger age at onset, epithelioid differentiation, and better prognosis (153). At the same time, BAP1 mutation is strongly associated with a more aggressive, metastatic phenotype in uveal melanomas (143). BAP1 is frequently mutated in sporadic clear cell RCC with an incidence rate of 6–17%, which is associated with high tumor grade, rhabdoid/sarcomatoid transformation, and poor clinical outcome (154, 155). From a therapeutic standpoint in renal cell carcinoma, inactivation of BAP1 sensitizes tumor cells to irradiation and PARP-inhibitors, which might be due to the impaired ability of double-stranded DNA breaks (87).

UCHs Members in HNC

Although UCHs members have been well investigated in a variety of human malignancies, the exact function of these enzymes in HNSCC pathogenesis and progression remain elusive. Each member of the UCHs family exerts distinct roles depending on the various tumor types. For example, UCHL1 has been controversially considered as a tumor suppressor or tumor promoter in specific tumor types. It was reported that UCHL1 is silenced by promoter CpG hypermethylation in a large panel of primary tumors including HNSCC cell lines and primary tumors, suggesting a tumor-suppressive function (33, 156). The methylation of the CpG locus associated with the UCHL1 gene is dependent on the anatomic site of HNSCC primary tumors, with most hypermethylation of UCHL1 specifically in oral cavity SCC (157). Restored UCHL1 expression significantly suppressed tumor cell proliferation and induced cellular apoptosis through activation of the p14ARF-p53 signaling pathway (33). A more recent study in nasopharyngeal carcinoma revealed a similar conclusion that UCHL1 promoter hypermethylation was validated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissues. In addition, restoration of UCHL1 inhibits tumor invasion and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. UCHL1 exerts tumor suppressor function by inducing K48-linked ubiquitination of CTTN (71). Currently, it is widely accepted that high-risk HPV infection is a risk factor for HNSCC, particularly in the oropharynx. High-risk HPV infects the oropharyngeal epithelium causing host immune suppression and evasion (11). UCHL1 does not assist HPV genome replication and viral propagation, but suppresses keratinocyte-mediated production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, thereby contributing to immune evasion and HPV persistent infection (158). UCHL1 interacts with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3), which acts as a negative regulator of the alternative NF-κB pathway and antiviral type I IFN activation. TRAF3 has been shown as a tumor suppressor that regulates the malignant phenotype of HPV-positive HNSCC (158).

As a tumor suppressor, BAP1 is critical for promoting DNA repair and cellular recovery from DSB via modulation of H2A ubiquitination (159). BAP1 was found to mediate radioresistance in an in vivo xenograft model and HNSCC cell lines via the deubiquitination of H2A and modulation of HR. Moreover, up-regulation of BAP1 was associated with worse clinical outcome in HNSCC, which indicates BAP1 might serve as a potential therapeutic target in HNSCC (32). In summary, it seems that loss of BAP1 foster genomic instability in tumor pathogenesis, however, the activity of BAP1 promotes tumor cell survival and contributes to therapeutic resistance during irradiation.

Induced activity of UCHL1 and UCHL3 were observed in E6/E7 immortalized primary keratinocytes, indicating the potential function of UCHL1 and UCHL3 in HPV-related HNSCC (103). However, few direct evidences concerning the function of UCHL3 and UCH37 in HNSCC have been reported.

Recently, comprehensive epigenetic and genomic profiling studies have highlighted the most frequently altered genes and signaling pathways in HNSCC. The genomic characterization of 279 HNSCCs including HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors, has been published (23). Moreover, the molecular profiling data from over 500 HNSCC patients are available at the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics, which provides interactive exploration and analysis of genetic alterations (160, 161). In addition, the GTEx project provides RNA sequencing data from more than 8,000 normal tissues. Currently, several web-based tools deliver interface-friendly and personalized functions based on TCGA and GTEx data (161, 162). cBioPortal provides visualization for the genomic alteration data. Clinical and genomic analysis of multicohort HNSCC has demonstrated that HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors present heterogeneity in anatomical regions, mutation profiles, molecular characteristics, immune landscapes, and clinical prognosis. Many evidence revealed the diversity and heterogeneity of HNSCC clinicopathology and therapeutic responses depending on HPV status (163). To better understand the UCHs family mutational landscape in HNSCC, the cBioPortal tool was used to display the types of mutations and their positions in the domain structure of proteins (Figures 2A, B). UCHs member genes are altered in 22 (8%) of queried patients. Of these, 20 cases are HPV-negative, and 2 cases are HPV-positive.

Figure 2

UCHL1 alterations accounted for 0.4% in HPV-negative subgroup and no genetic alteration in HPV-positive patients, UCHL3 for 3.3% in HPV-negative and 2.7% in HPV-positive, UCHL5 for 2% in HPV-negative and 2.7% in HPV-positive, and BAP1 for 2.4% in HPV-negative and 0 in HPV-positive. Interestingly, there is no samples overlapped. Concerning the mutation type, one missense mutation in UCH-domain of UCHL3, two missense mutations in UCHL5, two missense mutations and one truncating mutation in BAP1. A web-based tool GEPIA (164) analysis revealed UCHL1 gene expression in HNSCC tissues is significantly elevated as compared to normal tissues, which is different from the previous studies in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (71) (Figure 3A). Survival analyses based on gene expression levels was also applied to evaluate the clinical relevance of UCHs family genes (Figures 3B, C). The quartile cut-off method was determined depending on the optimization and visualization of the online web tool. However, numerous problems remain unsolved. We were not able to divide the cohort into two subtypes due to the incompleteness of the HPV status information. More specific subgroups of HNSCC patients for certain phenotypes need to be discovered depending on the protein expression patterns of UCHs family, which may contribute to illuminate the clinical relevance of UCHs family for HNSCC patients. Moreover, the gene networks regulated by UCHs family genes should be identified by analyzing the RNA-sequencing profiling data. Novel signaling pathways and biological processes related to UCHs family in HNSCC are urgent to be clarified. Functional proteomics represents a useful approach to investigate the UCHs family activity-related biological processes in different subtypes of HNSCC. Only BAP1 protein expression data by reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPAs) are available in the TCPA dataset, where BAP1 serves as a strong prognostic predictor for female-related cancer cohorts including samples of invasive breast carcinoma, Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (25). More large-scale proteomic profiling data on the other UCHs members are urgent to be produced.

Figure 3

Therapeutic Implications for HNC Targeting UCHs members

Research on targeting UCHs members in HNSCC therapy is still in the initial period. To our knowledge, there are no studies focusing on UCHs family molecular inhibitors or drugs for clinical trials, which reflects the lack of theoretical and preclinical research. Encouragingly, UCHs family has been shown to predict therapeutic sensitivity and clinical outcomes for various tumors. For example, UCHL1 strengthens tumor cells chemosensitivity in melanoma and colorectal cancer by stabilizing NOXA (165). BAP1 was also reported to modulate cancer cell sensitivity to radiotherapy and the molecular inhibitors including PARP (olaparib) or histone deacetylase inhibitors (panobinostat), which may become potential therapeutic strategies (87, 166). The small molecule b-AP15 as a previously unidentified class of proteasome inhibitor abrogates the activity of two 19S regulatory-particle-associated deubiquitinases, UCH37/UCHL5, and USP14 (167). In vivo b-AP15 prevents tumor progression in four different solid tumor models, including HNSCC, indicating deubiquitinating activity of UCH37/UCHL5 represents a novel therapeutic target for cancer (167).

Over the last decade, the high-risk HPV infection in HNC plays a critical role in staging and prognosis, which promotes personalized therapy and the de-intensification of currently established treatment protocols based on HPV status (168). The underlying mechanisms of UCHs family in HPV-related carcinogenesis remains an enigma. It is worth mentioning that UCHL1 was specifically up-regulated by high-risk HPV in primary keratinocytes to escape innate immunity. Therefore, the precious functions of UCHL1 and other UCHs family members in HPV-related HNSCC need to be disclosed. One of the current therapeutic challenges is to find more suitable biomarkers or surrogate markers for the identity and selection of subpopulation, which would benefit from personalized and therapy. Response rates of HNSCC patients to cetuximab, the only FDA-approved molecularly target-EGFR monoclonal antibody, are only 10% (169). UCHs members have been described to interact with EGFR (170), suggesting the potential of combination therapy with UCHs members for cetuximab treatment in HNSCC.

HNSCC, like other human malignancies, is an immunosuppressive disease. Therefore, immunomodulatory treatment to overcome immune suppressive phenotypes in HNSCC patients has emerged as novel and effective strategies, which include cancer vaccines (e.g., HPV vaccines, tumor peptide antigens), cytokines (e.g., IL2, IFNγ, TNFα), specific monoclonal antibodies (e.g., anti-PD1/PD-L1, CTLA-4 antibodies) (171). Over the past 10 years, the most remarkable therapeutic advances have been achieved in immune checkpoint blockade in HNSCC. FDA approved several target immune checkpoint agents for the treatment of patients with HNSCC. However, the patients revealed different responses to these agents, with only less than 20% of the responder (172, 173). There are many challenges for the immunotherapy of HNC in the future, such as the selection of responding patients, integration into the spectrum of conventional treatment, reduction of immunosuppression in non-responding patients (174). The DUBs are involved in the regulation of innate and adaptive immune response, which sheds light on the immunoregulatory of UCHs family for combination immunotherapy in HNSCC (114, 175). In addition, a variety of patented compounds targeting UCHs members have been developed, which would prepare a path toward the outstanding achievement of genuinely personalized medicine for the treatment of cancers (176–179).

Conclusion and Perspective

In summary, an increasing number of studies suggest that members of UCHs family exert distinct functions in a variety of human malignancies. However, available studies on UCHs in head and neck cancer are limited. It is an exciting time for HNSCC research based on the comprehensive genomic data, as the molecular landscape and altered signaling pathways has been synthetically described. But there are no genetic and proteomic screening tests routinely incorporated into the HNSCC clinically. Emerging evidence has revealed the members of UCHs are associated with the pathogenesis and clinical prognosis of HNSCC, which highlights the prognostic and therapeutic implications of UCHs for patients with HNC. Based on the available data, we have launched a joint project on the expression and function of UCHs in HNSCC, which aims to provide more evidence that UCHs might be the novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target. There are some emerging unresolved issues in HNSCC, such as: what are the precise substrates and regulators of the UCHs family? What are genetic or epigenetic events, and signaling pathways relevant to the UCHs family? Are UCHs family members able to serve as biomarkers for identifying a subset of patients to receive the optimal treatment? Can the agents targeting UCHs family become one of the novel treatment regimens? Optimization of combination regimens of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the agents targeting UCHs family may be a remarkable challenge for immunotherapy of HNSCC. Finally, whether and how the UCHs family members can be translated into the clinical management of HNC remains a formidable mission for the future.

Funding

CR and SW are supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 20KJB310014, No. 18KJB320017), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20200878). RZ and DS are supported by Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Research Fund Project of Chinese Medical Association (No. 320.6750.19090-19). S-LW is supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC1303800). This study was also supported by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References

• 1

  BrayFFerlayJSoerjomataramISiegelRLTorreLAJemalA. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin (2018) 68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  FerlayJColombetMSoerjomataramIDybaTRandiGBettioMet al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer (Oxford Engl 1990) (2018) 103:356–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  LeemansCRBraakhuisBJBrakenhoffRH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2011) 11(1):9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  ShieldKDFerlayJJemalASankaranarayananRChaturvediAKBrayFet al. The global incidence of lip, oral cavity, and pharyngeal cancers by subsite in 2012. CA: Cancer J Clin (2017) 67(1):51–64. doi: 10.3322/caac.21384

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  ArgirisAKaramouzisMVRabenDFerrisRL. Head and neck cancer. Lancet (2008) 371(9625):1695–709. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60728-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  GuoXJohnsonRCDengHLiaoJGuanLNelsonGWet al. Evaluation of nonviral risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a high-risk population of Southern China. Int J Cancer (2009) 124(12):2942–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24293

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  TsaoSWYipYLTsangCMPangPSLauVMYZhangGet al. Etiological factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol (2014) 50(5):330–8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.02.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  ChuaMLKWeeJTSHuiEPChanATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet (London England) (2016) 387(10022):1012–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00055-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  RietbergenMMvan BokhovenALissenberg-WitteBIHeidemanDAMLeemansCRBrakenhoffRHet al. Epidemiologic associations of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer and (pre)cancerous cervical lesions. Int J Cancer J Int Du Cancer (2018) 143(2):283–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31315

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  GillisonMLKochWMCaponeRBSpaffordMWestraWHWuLet al. Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Institute (2000) 92(9):709–20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.709

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  SabatiniMEChioccaS. Human papillomavirus as a driver of head and neck cancers. Br J Cancer (2020) 122(3):306–14. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0602-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  SyrjanenS. Human papillomavirus (HPV) in head and neck cancer. J Clin Virol (2005) 32 Suppl 1:S59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.11.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  MarurSD’SouzaGWestraWHForastiereAA. HPV-associated head and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic. Lancet Oncol (2010) 11(8):781–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70017-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  RenSGaykalovaDAGuoTFavorovAVFertigEJTamayoPet al. HPV E2, E4, E5 drive alternative carcinogenic pathways in HPV positive cancers. Oncogene (2020) 39(40):6327–39. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01431-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BraakhuisBJSnijdersPJKeuneWJMeijerCJRuijter-SchippersHJLeemansCRet al. Genetic patterns in head and neck cancers that contain or lack transcriptionally active human papillomavirus. J Natl Cancer Institute (2004) 96(13):998–1006. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  SlebosRJYiYElyKCarterJEvjenAZhangXet al. Gene expression differences associated with human papillomavirus status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res An (2006) 12(3 Pt 1):701–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  AngKKHarrisJWheelerRWeberRRosenthalDINguyen-TanPFet al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. New Engl J Med (2010) 363(1):24–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912217

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  SpenceTBruceJYipKWLiuFF. HPV Associated Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) (2016) 8(8). doi: 10.3390/cancers8080075

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  CheraBSAmdurRJTepperJQaqishBGreenRAumerSLet al. Phase 2 Trial of De-intensified Chemoradiation Therapy for Favorable-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2015) 93(5):976–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  MirghaniHAmenFBlanchardPMoreauFGuigayJHartlDMet al. Treatment de-escalation in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma: ongoing trials, critical issues and perspectives. Int J Cancer J Int Du Cancer (2015) 136(7):1494–503. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28847

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and cetuximab followed by cetuximab and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating patients with HPV-associated stage III or stage IV cancer of the oropharynx that can be removed by surgery; NCT01084083. Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BigelowEOSeiwertTYFakhryC. Deintensification of treatment for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer: Current state and future directions. Oral Oncol (2020) 105:104652. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104652

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  Cancer Genome AtlasN. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature (2015) 517(7536):576–82. doi: 10.1038/nature14129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  AkbaniRNgPKWernerHMShahmoradgoliMZhangFJuZet al. A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nat Commun (2014) 5:3887. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4887

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  LiJLuYAkbaniRJuZRoebuckPLLiuWet al. TCPA: a resource for cancer functional proteomics data. Nat Methods (2013) 10(11):1046–7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2650

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  FangYShenX. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolases: involvement in cancer progression and clinical implications. Cancer Metastasis Rev (2017) 36(4):669–82. doi: 10.1007/s10555-017-9702-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  NijmanSMLuna-VargasMPVeldsABrummelkampTRDiracAMSixmaTKet al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell (2005) 123(5):773–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  PfohRLacdaoIKSaridakisV. Deubiquitinases and the new therapeutic opportunities offered to cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer (2015) 22(1):T35–54. doi: 10.1530/ERC-14-0516

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  PalAYoungMADonatoNJ. Emerging potential of therapeutic targeting of ubiquitin-specific proteases in the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res (2014) 74(18):4955–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1211

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  Reyes-TurcuFEVentiiKHWilkinsonKD. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem (2009) 78:363–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082307.091526

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  YoungMJHsuKCLinTEChangWCHungJJ. The role of ubiquitin-specific peptidases in cancer progression. J BioMed Sci (2019) 26(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0522-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  LiuXKumarMYangLMolkentineDPValdecanasDYuSet al. BAP1 Is a Novel Target in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24(3):600–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1573

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  LiLTaoQJinHvan HasseltAPoonFFWangXet al. The tumor suppressor UCHL1 forms a complex with p53/MDM2/ARF to promote p53 signaling and is frequently silenced in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2010) 16(11):2949–58. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3178

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  LiuYFallonLLashuelHALiuZLansburyPTJr.The UCH-L1 gene encodes two opposing enzymatic activities that affect alpha-synuclein degradation and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility. Cell (2002) 111(2):209–18. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01012-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  LarsenCNPriceJSWilkinsonKD. Substrate binding and catalysis by ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases: identification of two active site residues. Biochemistry (1996) 35(21):6735–44. doi: 10.1021/bi960099f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  LarsenCNKrantzBAWilkinsonKD. Substrate specificity of deubiquitinating enzymes: ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases. Biochemistry (1998) 37(10):3358–68. doi: 10.1021/bi972274d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  SakuraiMSekiguchiMZushidaKYamadaKNagamineSKabutaTet al. Reduction in memory in passive avoidance learning, exploratory behaviour and synaptic plasticity in mice with a spontaneous deletion in the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 gene. Eur J Neurosci (2008) 27(3):691–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06047.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  DayINThompsonRJ. UCHL1 (PGP 9.5): neuronal biomarker and ubiquitin system protein. Prog Neurobiol (2010) 90(3):327–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.10.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  SetsuieRWadaK. The functions of UCH-L1 and its relation to neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem Int (2007) 51(2-4):105–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.05.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  ChoiJLeveyAIWeintraubSTReesHDGearingMChinLSet al. Oxidative modifications and down-regulation of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 associated with idiopathic Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. J Biol Chem (2004) 279(13):13256–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314124200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ChaiCLimKL. Genetic insights into sporadic Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Curr Genomics (2013) 14(8):486–501. doi: 10.2174/1389202914666131210195808

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  LeroyEBoyerRAuburgerGLeubeBUlmGMezeyEet al. The ubiquitin pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Nature (1998) 395(6701):451–2. doi: 10.1038/26652

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  MaraganoreDMFarrerMJHardyJALincolnSJMcDonnellSKRoccaWA. Case-control study of the ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 gene in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology (1999) 53(8):1858–60. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.8.1858

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  LiuHPovyshevaNRoseMEMiZBantonJSLiWet al. Role of UCHL1 in axonal injury and functional recovery after cerebral ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2019) 116(10):4643–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821282116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  McKeonJEShaDLiLChinLS. Parkin-mediated K63-polyubiquitination targets ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 for degradation by the autophagy-lysosome system. Cell Mol Life Sci (2015) 72(9):1811–24. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1781-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  BradburyJMThompsonRJ. Immunoassay of the neuronal and neuroendocrine marker PGP 9.5 in human tissues. J Neurochem (1985) 44(2):651–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1985.tb05461.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  SchumacherUMitchellBSKaiserlingE. The neuronal marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) is phenotypically expressed in human breast epithelium, in milk, and in benign and malignant breast tumors. DNA Cell Biol (1994) 13(8):839–43. doi: 10.1089/dna.1994.13.839

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  OlerudJEChiuDSUsuiMLGibranNSAnselJC. Protein gene product 9.5 is expressed by fibroblasts in human cutaneous wounds. J Invest Dermatol (1998) 111(4):565–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00330.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  BhedaAGullapalliACaplowMPaganoJSShackelfordJ. Ubiquitin editing enzyme UCH L1 and microtubule dynamics: implication in mitosis. Cell Cycle (2010) 9(5):980–94. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.5.10934

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  MiyoshiYNakayamaSTorikoshiYTanakaSIshiharaHTaguchiTet al. High expression of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 and -L3 mRNA predicts early recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer. Cancer Sci (2006) 97(6):523–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00202.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  UmmanniRMundtFPospisilHVenzSScharfCBarettCet al. Identification of clinically relevant protein targets in prostate cancer with 2D-DIGE coupled mass spectrometry and systems biology network platform. PloS One (2011) 6(2):e16833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016833

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  FukutomiSSekiNKodaKMiyazakiM. Identification of methylation-silenced genes in colorectal cancer cell lines: genomic screening using oligonucleotide arrays. Scand J Gastroenterol (2007) 42(12):1486–94. doi: 10.1080/00365520701491173

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  LiuSGonzalez-PrietoRZhangMGeurinkPPKooijRIyengarPVet al. Deubiquitinase Activity Profiling Identifies UCHL1 as a Candidate Oncoprotein That Promotes TGFbeta-Induced Breast Cancer Metastasis. Clin Cancer Res (2019). doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1373

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  YamashitaKParkHLKimMSOsadaMTokumaruYInoueHet al. PGP9.5 methylation in diffuse-type gastric cancer. Cancer Res (2006) 66(7):3921–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1511

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  TezelEHibiKNagasakaTNakaoA. PGP9.5 as a Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res (2000) 6:4764–7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.417

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  Hurst-KennedyJChinLSLiL. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase l1 in tumorigenesis. Biochem Res Int (2012) 2012:123706. doi: 10.1155/2012/123706

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  JaraJHFrankDDOzdinlerPH. Could dysregulation of UPS be a common underlying mechanism for cancer and neurodegeneration? Lessons from UCHL1. Cell Biochem Biophys (2013) 67(1):45–53. doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9631-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  XiangTLiLYinXYuanCTanCSuXet al. The ubiquitin peptidase UCHL1 induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through stabilizing p53 and is frequently silenced in breast cancer. PloS One (2012) 7(1):e29783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029783

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  YuJTaoQCheungKFJinHPoonFFWangXet al. Epigenetic identification of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 as a functional tumor suppressor and biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma and other digestive tumors. Hepatology (2008) 48(2):508–18. doi: 10.1002/hep.22343

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  Abdelmaksoud-DammakRSaadallah-KallelAMiladi-AbdennadherIAyediLKhabirASallemi-BoudawaraTet al. CpG methylation of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 1 (UCHL1) and P53 mutation pattern in sporadic colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol (2016) 37(2):1707–14. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3902-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  UmmanniRJostEBraigMLohmannFMundtFBarettCet al. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 1 (UCHL1) is a potential tumour suppressor in prostate cancer and is frequently silenced by promoter methylation. Mol Cancer (2011) 10:129. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  ZhongJZhaoMMaYLuoQLiuJWangJet al. UCHL1 acts as a colorectal cancer oncogene via activation of the beta-catenin/TCF pathway through its deubiquitinating activity. Int J Mol Med (2012) 30(2):430–6. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Sanchez-DiazPCChangJCMosesESDaoTChenYHungJY. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL1) is associated with stem-like cancer cell functions in pediatric high-grade glioma. PloS One (2017) 12(5):e0176879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176879

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  KimHJMageshVLeeJJKimSKnausUGLeeKJ. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 increases cancer cell invasion by modulating hydrogen peroxide generated via NADPH oxidase 4. Oncotarget (2015) 6(18):16287–303. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3843

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  JinYZhangWXuJWangHZhangZChuCet al. UCH-L1 involved in regulating the degradation of EGFR and promoting malignant properties in drug-resistant breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2015) 8(10):12500–8.

  • Google Scholar

• 66

  GotoYZengLYeomCJZhuYMorinibuAShinomiyaKet al. UCHL1 provides diagnostic and antimetastatic strategies due to its deubiquitinating effect on HIF-1alpha. Nat Commun (2015) 6:6153. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7153

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  LiXHattoriATakahashiSGotoYHaradaHKakeyaH. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 promotes hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent tumor cell malignancy in spheroid models. Cancer Sci (2019). doi: 10.1111/cas.14236

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  KwanSYAu-YeungCLYeungTLRynne-VidalAWongKKRisingerJIet al. Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) Promotes Uterine Serous Cancer Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(1). doi: 10.3390/cancers12010118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  HussainSForemanOPerkinsSLWitzigTEMilesRRvan DeursenJet al. The de-ubiquitinase UCH-L1 is an oncogene that drives the development of lymphoma in vivo by deregulating PHLPP1 and Akt signaling. Leukemia (2010) 24(9):1641–55. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.138

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  SeoEYJinSPSohnKCParkCHLeeDHChungJH. UCHL1 Regulates Melanogenesis through Controlling MITF Stability in Human Melanocytes. J Invest Dermatol (2017) 137(8):1757–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.03.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  ZhaoYLeiYHeSWLiYQWangYQHongXHet al. Hypermethylation of UCHL1 Promotes Metastasis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Suppressing Degradation of Cortactin (CTTN). Cells (2020) 9(3). doi: 10.3390/cells9030559

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  HussainSBedekovicsTLiuQHuWJeonHJohnsonSHet al. UCH-L1 bypasses mTOR to promote protein biosynthesis and is required for MYC-driven lymphomagenesis in mice. Blood (2018) 132(24):2564–74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-05-848515

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  HussainSBedekovicsTAliAZaidOMayDGRouxKJet al. A cysteine near the C-terminus of UCH-L1 is dispensable for catalytic activity but is required to promote AKT phosphorylation, eIF4F assembly, and malignant B-cell survival. Cell Death Discov (2019) 5:152. doi: 10.1038/s41420-019-0231-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  ZhangMHZhangHHDuXHGaoJLiCShiHRet al. UCHL3 promotes ovarian cancer progression by stabilizing TRAF2 to activate the NF-kappaB pathway. Oncogene (2020) 39(2):322–33. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0987-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  LuoKLiLLiYWuCYinYChenYet al. A phosphorylation-deubiquitination cascade regulates the BRCA2-RAD51 axis in homologous recombination. Genes Dev (2016) 30(23):2581–95. doi: 10.1101/gad.289439.116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  FangYFuDTangWCaiYMaDWangHet al. Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase 37, a novel predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, promotes cell migration and invasion via interacting and deubiquitinating PRP19. Biochim Biophys Acta (2013) 1833(3):559–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.11.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  FangYHeJJanssenHLAWuJDongLShenXZ. Peroxiredoxin 1, restraining cell migration and invasion, is involved in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. J Dig Dis (2018) 19(3):155–69. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12580

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  GeJHuWZhouHYuJSunCChenW. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L5 inhibits human glioma cell migration and invasion via downregulating SNRPF. Oncotarget (2017) 8(69):113635–49. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23071

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  FukuiSNagasakaKMiyagawaYKikuchi-KoikeRKawataYKandaRet al. The proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor bAP15 downregulates TGF-beta/Smad signaling and induces apoptosis via UCHL5 inhibition in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget (2019) 10(57):5932–48. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27219

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  FangYMuJMaYMaDFuDShenX. The interaction between ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase 37 and glucose-regulated protein 78 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem (2012) 359(1-2):59–66. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-0999-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  HanWLeeHHanJK. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase37 regulates Tcf7 DNA binding for the activation of Wnt signalling. Sci Rep (2017) 7:42590. doi: 10.1038/srep42590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  RandlesLAnchooriRKRodenRBWaltersKJ. The Proteasome Ubiquitin Receptor hRpn13 and Its Interacting Deubiquitinating Enzyme Uch37 Are Required for Proper Cell Cycle Progression. J Biol Chem (2016) 291(16):8773–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.694588

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  JensenDEProctorMMarquisSTGardnerHPHaSIChodoshLAet al. BAP1: a novel ubiquitin hydrolase which binds to the BRCA1 RING finger and enhances BRCA1-mediated cell growth suppression. Oncogene (1998) 16(9):1097–112. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201861

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  DkhissiFAggouneDPontisJSorelNPiccirilliNLeCorfAet al. The downregulation of BAP1 expression by BCR-ABL reduces the stability of BRCA1 in chronic myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol (2015) 43(9):775–80. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.04.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  ShankarGMSantagataS. BAP1 mutations in high-grade meningioma: implications for patient care. Neuro Oncol (2017) 19(11):1447–56. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox094

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  MachidaYJMachidaYVashishtAAWohlschlegelJADuttaA. The deubiquitinating enzyme BAP1 regulates cell growth via interaction with HCF-1. J Biol Chem (2009) 284(49):34179–88. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.046755

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  Pena-LlopisSVega-Rubin-de-CelisSLiaoALengNPavia-JimenezAWangSet al. BAP1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet (2012) 44(7):751–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.2323

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  LeeHSLeeSAHurSKSeoJWKwonJ. Stabilization and targeting of INO80 to replication forks by BAP1 during normal DNA synthesis. Nat Commun (2014) 5:5128. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6128

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  ZarriziRMenardJABeltingMMassoumiR. Deubiquitination of gamma-tubulin by BAP1 prevents chromosome instability in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res (2014) 74(22):6499–508. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0221

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  DaouSBarbourHAhmedOMasclefLBarilCSen NkweNet al. Monoubiquitination of ASXLs controls the deubiquitinase activity of the tumor suppressor BAP1. Nat Commun (2018) 9(1):4385. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06854-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  PengJMaJLiWMoRZhangPGaoKet al. Stabilization of MCRS1 by BAP1 prevents chromosome instability in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett (2015) 369(1):167–74. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  BononiAGiorgiCPatergnaniSLarsonDVerbruggenKTanjiMet al. BAP1 regulates IP3R3-mediated Ca(2+) flux to mitochondria suppressing cell transformation. Nature (7659) 2017) 546:549–53. doi: 10.1038/nature22798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  DaiFLeeHZhangYZhuangLYaoHXiYet al. BAP1 inhibits the ER stress gene regulatory network and modulates metabolic stress response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2017) 114(12):3192–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619588114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  SimeWNiuQAbassiYMasoumiKCZarriziRKohlerJBet al. BAP1 induces cell death via interaction with 14-3-3 in neuroblastoma. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(5):458. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0500-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  ZhangYShiJLiuXFengLGongZKoppulaPet al. BAP1 links metabolic regulation of ferroptosis to tumour suppression. Nat Cell Biol (2018) 20(10):1181–92. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0178-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  ZhangYZhuangLGanB. BAP1 suppresses tumor development by inducing ferroptosis upon SLC7A11 repression. Mol Cell Oncol (2019) 6(1):1536845. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2018.1536845

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  LuoYHeJYangCOrangeMRenXBlairNet al. UCH-L1 promotes invasion of breast cancer cells through activating Akt signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem (2018) 119(1):691–700. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26232

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  Okochi-TakadaENakazawaKWakabayashiMMoriAIchimuraSYasugiTet al. Silencing of the UCHL1 gene in human colorectal and ovarian cancers. Int J Cancer J Int Du Cancer (2006) 119(6):1338–44. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  DingXGuYJinMGuoXXueSTanCet al. The deubiquitinating enzyme UCHL1 promotes resistance to pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer by upregulating thymidylate synthase. Theranostics (2020) 10(13):6048–60. doi: 10.7150/thno.42096

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  BedekovicsTHussainSFeldmanALGalardyPJ. UCH-L1 is induced in germinal center B cells and identifies patients with aggressive germinal center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood (2016) 127(12):1564–74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-656678

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  LiGJinXZhengJJiangNShiW. UCH-L3 promotes non-small cell lung cancer proliferation via accelerating cell cycle and inhibiting cell apoptosis. Biotechnol Appl Biochem (2020). doi: 10.1002/bab.1909

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  SongHMLeeJEKimJH. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L3 regulates EMT process and cancer metastasis in prostate cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2014) 452(3):722–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.144

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  RolenUKobzevaVGasparjanNOvaaHWinbergGKisseljovFet al. Activity profiling of deubiquitinating enzymes in cervical carcinoma biopsies and cell lines. Mol Carcinog (2006) 45(4):260–9. doi: 10.1002/mc.20177

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  ChenYFuDXiJJiZLiuTMaYet al. Expression and clinical significance of UCH37 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci (2012) 57(9):2310–7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2181-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  ShaBChenXWuHLiMShiJWangLet al. Deubiquitylatinase inhibitor b-AP15 induces c-Myc-Noxa-mediated apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Apoptosis An Int J Programmed Cell Death (2019) 24(9-10):826–36. doi: 10.1007/s10495-019-01561-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  LeblayNLepretreFLe StangNGautier-SteinAVilleneuveLIsaacSet al. BAP1 Is Altered by Copy Number Loss, Mutation, and/or Loss of Protein Expression in More Than 70% of Malignant Peritoneal Mesotheliomas. J Thoracic Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer (2017) 12(4):724–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  YoshikawaYSatoATsujimuraTEmiMMorinagaTFukuokaKet al. Frequent inactivation of the BAP1 gene in epithelioid-type malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Sci (2012) 103(5):868–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02223.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  JosephRWKapurPSerieDJEckel-PassowJEParasramkaMHoTet al. Loss of BAP1 protein expression is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with low-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer (2014) 120(7):1059–67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28521

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  SeeTRStalhammarGPhillipsSGrossniklausHE. BAP1 Immunoreactivity Correlates with Gene Expression Class in Uveal Melanoma. Ocul Oncol Pathol (2020) 6(2):129–37. doi: 10.1159/000502550

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  KaliraiHDodsonAFaqirSDamatoBECouplandSE. Lack of BAP1 protein expression in uveal melanoma is associated with increased metastatic risk and has utility in routine prognostic testing. Br J Cancer (2014) 111(7):1373–80. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.417

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  MochelMCPirisANoseVHoangMP. Loss of BAP1 Expression in Basal Cell Carcinomas in Patients With Germline BAP1 Mutations. Am J Clin Pathol (2015) 143(6):901–4. doi: 10.1309/AJCPG8LFJC0DHDQT

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  MoriTSumiiMFujishimaFUenoKEmiMNagasakiMet al. Somatic alteration and depleted nuclear expression of BAP1 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci (2015) 106(9):1118–29. doi: 10.1111/cas.12722

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  ReinickeATRaczkowskiFMuhligMSchmuckerPLischkeTReicheltJet al. Deubiquitinating Enzyme UCH-L1 Promotes Dendritic Cell Antigen Cross-Presentation by Favoring Recycling of MHC Class I Molecules. J Immunol (2019) 203(7):1730–42. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801133

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  GuYDingXHuangJXueMZhangJWangQet al. The deubiquitinating enzyme UCHL1 negatively regulates the immunosuppressive capacity and survival of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(5):459. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0532-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  WadaHKitoKCaskeyLSYehETKamitaniT. Cleavage of the C-terminus of NEDD8 by UCH-L3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1998) 251(3):688–92. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9532

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  KwonJWangYLSetsuieRSekiguchiSSatoYSakuraiMet al. Two closely related ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase isozymes function as reciprocal modulators of germ cell apoptosis in cryptorchid testis. Am J Pathol (2004) 165(4):1367–74. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63394-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  SanoYFurutaASetsuieRKikuchiHWangYLSakuraiMet al. Photoreceptor cell apoptosis in the retinal degeneration of Uchl3-deficient mice. Am J Pathol (2006) 169(1):132–41. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060085

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  KuriharaLJKikuchiTWadaKTilghmanSM. Loss of Uch-L1 and Uch-L3 leads to neurodegeneration, posterior paralysis and dysphagia. Hum Mol Genet (2001) 10(18):1963–70. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.18.1963

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  SetsuieRSuzukiMTsuchiyaYWadaK. Skeletal muscles of Uchl3 knockout mice show polyubiquitinated protein accumulation and stress responses. Neurochem Int (2010) 56(8):911–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.03.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  SetsuieRSuzukiMKabutaTFujitaHMiuraSIchiharaNet al. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L3-knockout mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and show increased activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in skeletal muscle. FASEB J (2009) 23(12):4148–57. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-132217

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  SuzukiMSetsuieRWadaK. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase l3 promotes insulin signaling and adipogenesis. Endocrinology (2009) 150(12):5230–9. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0332

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  KimJYLeeJMChoJY. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L3 regulates Smad1 ubiquitination and osteoblast differentiation. FEBS Lett (2011) 585(8):1121–6. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.053

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  DennissenFJKholodNHermesDJKemmerlingNSteinbuschHWDantumaNPet al. Mutant ubiquitin (UBB+1) associated with neurodegenerative disorders is hydrolyzed by ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L3 (UCH-L3). FEBS Lett (2011) 585(16):2568–74. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.06.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  LamYADeMartinoGNPickartCMCohenRE. Specificity of the ubiquitin isopeptidase in the PA700 regulatory complex of 26 S proteasomes. J Biol Chem (1997) 272(45):28438–46. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28438

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  YaoTSongLXuWDeMartinoGNFlorensLSwansonSKet al. Proteasome recruitment and activation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme by Adrm1. Nat Cell Biol (2006) 8(9):994–1002. doi: 10.1038/ncb1460

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  HamazakiJIemuraSNatsumeTYashirodaHTanakaKMurataS. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J (2006) 25(19):4524–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601338

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  QiuXBOuyangSYLiCJMiaoSWangLGoldbergAL. hRpn13/ADRM1/GP110 is a novel proteasome subunit that binds the deubiquitinating enzyme, UCH37. EMBO J (2006) 25(24):5742–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601450

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  SahtoeDDvan DijkWJEl OualidFEkkebusROvaaHSixmaTK. Mechanism of UCH-L5 activation and inhibition by DEUBAD domains in RPN13 and INO80G. Mol Cell (2015) 57(5):887–900. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  Al-ShamiAJhaverKGVogelPWilkinsCHumphriesJDavisJJet al. Regulators of the proteasome pathway, Uch37 and Rpn13, play distinct roles in mouse development. PloS One (2010) 5(10):e13654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013654

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  YunDZhuangYKreutzMRBehnischT. The role of 19S proteasome associated deubiquitinases in activity-dependent hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology (2018) 133:354–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  KikuchiMOgishimaSMiyamotoTMiyashitaAKuwanoRNakayaJet al. Identification of unstable network modules reveals disease modules associated with the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. PloS One (2013) 8(11):e76162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076162

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  MahanicCSBudhavarapuVGravesJDLiGLinWC. Regulation of E2 promoter binding factor 1 (E2F1) transcriptional activity through a deubiquitinating enzyme, UCH37. J Biol Chem (2015) 290(44):26508–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.659425

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  NanLJackoAMTanJWangDZhaoJKassDJet al. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L5 promotes TGFbeta-1 signaling by de-ubiquitinating and stabilizing Smad2/Smad3 in pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep (2016) 6:33116. doi: 10.1038/srep33116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  WicksSJHarosKMaillardMSongLCohenREDijkePTet al. The deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 interacts with Smads and regulates TGF-beta signalling. Oncogene (2005) 24(54):8080–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208944

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  ChenZNiuXLiZYuYYeXLuSet al. Effect of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase 37 on apoptotic in A549 cells. Cell Biochem Funct (2011) 29(2):142–8. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1734

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  ArpalahtiLLaitinenAHagstromJMustonenHKokkolaABockelmanCet al. Positive cytoplasmic UCHL5 tumor expression in gastric cancer is linked to improved prognosis. PloS One (2018) 13(2):e0193125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193125

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  ArpalahtiLHagstromJMustonenHLundinMHaglundCHolmbergCI. UCHL5 expression associates with improved survival in lymph-node-positive rectal cancer. Tumour Biol (2017) 39(7):1010428317716078. doi: 10.1177/1010428317716078

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  ArpalahtiLSaukkonenKHagstromJMustonenHSeppanenHHaglundCet al. Nuclear ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L5 expression associates with increased patient survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol (2017) 39(6):1010428317710411. doi: 10.1177/1010428317710411

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  WangAPapnejaAHyrczaMAl-HabeebAGhazarianD. Gene of the month: BAP1. J Clin Pathol (2016) 69(9):750–3. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203866

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  OkinoYMachidaYFrankland-SearbySMachidaYJ. BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) deubiquitinase antagonizes the ubiquitin-mediated activation of FoxK2 target genes. J Biol Chem (2015) 290(3):1580–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.609834

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  DaouSHammond-MartelIMashtalirNBarbourHGagnonJIannantuonoNVet al. The BAP1/ASXL2 Histone H2A Deubiquitinase Complex Regulates Cell Proliferation and Is Disrupted in Cancer. J Biol Chem (2015) 290(48):28643–63. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.661553

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  Di NunnoVFregaGSantoniMGattoLFiorentinoMMontironiRet al. BAP1 in solid tumors. Future Oncol (2019) 15(18):2151–62. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0915

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  HarbourJWOnkenMDRobersonEDDuanSCaoLWorleyLAet al. Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas. Science (2010) 330(6009):1410–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1194472

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  TestaJRCheungMPeiJBelowJETanYSementinoEet al. Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma. Nat Genet (2011) 43(10):1022–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.912

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  FanLHTangLNYueLYangYGaoZLShenZ. BAP1 is a good prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Invest Med (2012) 35(4):E182–9. doi: 10.25011/cim.v35i4.17146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  NjauwCNKimIPirisAGabreeMTaylorMLaneAMet al. Germline BAP1 inactivation is preferentially associated with metastatic ocular melanoma and cutaneous-ocular melanoma families. PloS One (2012) 7(4):e35295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035295

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  FarleyMNSchmidtLSMesterJLPena-LlopisSPavia-JimenezAChristieAet al. A novel germline mutation in BAP1 predisposes to familial clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res MCR (2013) 11(9):1061–71. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  HirschTZNegulescuAGuptaBCarusoSNobletBCouchyGet al. BAP1 mutations define a homogeneous subgroup of hepatocellular carcinoma with fibrolamellar-like features and activated PKA. J Hepatol (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  MuraliRWiesnerTScolyerRA. Tumours associated with BAP1 mutations. Pathology (2013) 45(2):116–26. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32835d0efb

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  BaumannFFloresENapolitanoAKanodiaSTaioliEPassHet al. Mesothelioma patients with germline BAP1 mutations have 7-fold improved long-term survival. Carcinogenesis (2015) 36(1):76–81. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu227

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  WangKMcDermottJDSchrockABElvinJAGayLKaramSDet al. Comprehensive genomic profiling of salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas reveals frequent BAP1, PIK3CA, and other actionable genomic alterations. Ann Oncol (2017) 28(4):748–53. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw689

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  DuranteMAWalterSDPaez-EscamillaMTokarevJDecaturCLDubovySRet al. Intraocular Metastasis in Unilateral Multifocal Uveal Melanoma Without Melanocytosis or Germline BAP1 Mutations. JAMA Ophthalmol (2019). doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3941

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  FarzinMToonCWClarksonASiosonLWatsonNAndriciJet al. Loss of expression of BAP1 predicts longer survival in mesothelioma. Pathology (2015) 47(4):302–7. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000250

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  WangSSGuYFWolffNStefaniusKChristieADeyAet al. Bap1 is essential for kidney function and cooperates with Vhl in renal tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2014) 111(46):16538–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414789111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  BiMZhaoSSaidJWMerinoMJAdeniranAJXieZet al. Genomic characterization of sarcomatoid transformation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2016) 113(8):2170–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525735113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  TokumaruYYamashitaKKimMSParkHLOsadaMMoriMet al. The role of PGP9.5 as a tumor suppressor gene in human cancer. Int J Cancer J Int Du Cancer (2008) 123(4):753–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23354

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  LlerasRASmithRVAdrienLRSchlechtNFBurkRDHarrisTMet al. Unique DNA methylation loci distinguish anatomic site and HPV status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 19(19):5444–55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3280

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  ZhangJChenTYangXChengHSpathSSClavijoPEet al. Attenuated TRAF3 Fosters Activation of Alternative NF-kappaB and Reduced Expression of Antiviral Interferon, TP53, and RB to Promote HPV-Positive Head and Neck Cancers. Cancer Res (2018) 78(16):4613–26. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0642

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  YuHPakHHammond-MartelIGhramMRodrigueADaouSet al. Tumor suppressor and deubiquitinase BAP1 promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2014) 111(1):285–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309085110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  GaoJAksoyBADogrusozUDresdnerGGrossBSumerSOet al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal (2013) 6(269):p11. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  CeramiEGaoJDogrusozUGrossBESumerSOAksoyBAet al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discovery (2012) 2(5):401–4. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  LonsdaleJThomasJSalvatoreMPhillipsRLoEShadSet al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet (2013) 45(6):580–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.2653

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  CanningMGuoGYuMMyintCGrovesMWByrdJKet al. Heterogeneity of the Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Immune Landscape and Its Impact on Immunotherapy. Front Cell Dev Biol (2019) 7:52. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00052

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  TangZLiCKangBGaoGLiCZhangZ. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res (2017) 45(W1):W98–102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx247

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  BrinkmannKZigrinoPWittASchellMAckermannLBroxtermannPet al. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 potentiates cancer chemosensitivity by stabilizing NOXA. Cell Rep (2013) 3(3):881–91. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  PivaFSantoniMMatranaMRSattiSGiuliettiMOcchipintiGet al. BAP1, PBRM1 and SETD2 in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: molecular diagnostics and possible targets for personalized therapies. Expert Rev Mol Diagn (2015) 15(9):1201–10. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2015.1068122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  D’ArcyPBrnjicSOlofssonMHFryknasMLindstenKDe CesareMet al. Inhibition of proteasome deubiquitinating activity as a new cancer therapy. Nat Med (2011) 17(12):1636–40. doi: 10.1038/nm.2536

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  VentzSTrippaLSchoenfeldJD. Lessons Learned from De-escalation trials in favorable risk HPV-associated Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer - A Perspective on future trial designs. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25(24):7281–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0945

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  MehannaHRobinsonMHartleyAKongAForanBFulton-LieuwTet al. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet (2019) 393(10166):51–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32752-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  BiH-LZhangX-LZhangY-LXieXXiaY-LDuJet al. The deubiquitinase UCHL1 regulates cardiac hypertrophy by stabilizing epidermal growth factor receptor. J Sci Adv (2020) 6(16):eaax4826. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax4826

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  AzourySCGilmoreRCShuklaV. Molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Discovery Med (2016) 21(118):507–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32752-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  FerrisRL. Immunology and Immunotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol (2015) 33(29):3293–304. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1509

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  WhitesideTL. Head and Neck Carcinoma Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes. Clin Cancer Res An Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res (2017). doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1261

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  GotwalsPCameronSCipollettaDCremascoVCrystalAHewesBet al. Prospects for combining targeted and conventional cancer therapy with immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer (2017) 17(5):286–301. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.17

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  SunSC. Deubiquitylation and regulation of the immune response. Nat Rev Immunol (2008) 8(7):501–11. doi: 10.1038/nri2337

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  FarshiPDeshmukhRRNwankwoJOArkwrightRTCvekBLiuJet al. Deubiquitinases (DUBs) and DUB inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat (2015) 25(10):1191–208. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2015.1056737

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  HarriganJAJacqXMartinNMJacksonSP. Deubiquitylating enzymes and drug discovery: emerging opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2018) 17(1):57–78. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.152

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  IslamMTZhouXChenFKhanMAFuJChenH. Targeting the signalling pathways regulated by deubiquitinases for prostate cancer therapeutics. Cell Biochem Funct (2019) 37(5):304–19. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3401

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  SchauerNJMaginRSLiuXDohertyLMBuhrlageSJ. Advances in Discovering Deubiquitinating Enzyme (DUB) Inhibitors. J Med Chem (2020) 63(6):2731–50. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01138

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar