Advances in the Application of Radionuclide-Labeled HER2 Affibody for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a highly expressed tumor marker in epithelial ovarian cancer, and its overexpression is considered to be a potential factor of poor prognosis. Therefore, monitoring the expression of HER2 receptor in tumor tissue provides favorable conditions for accurate localization, diagnosis, targeted therapy, and prognosis evaluation of cancer foci. Affibody has the advantages of high affinity, small molecular weight, and stable biochemical properties. The molecular probes of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody have recently shown broad application prospects in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer; the aim is to introduce radionuclides into the cancer foci, display systemic lesions, and kill tumor cells through the radioactivity of the radionuclides. This process seamlessly integrates the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. Current research and development of new molecular probes of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody should focus on overcoming the deficiencies of non-specific uptake in the kidney, bone marrow, liver, and gastrointestinal tract, and on reducing the background of the image to improve image quality. By modifying the amino acid sequence; changing the hydrophilicity, surface charge, and lipid solubility of the affibody molecule; and using different radionuclides, chelating agents, and labeling conditions to optimize the labeling method of molecular probes, the specific uptake of molecular probes at tumor sites will be improved, while reducing radioactive retention in non-target organs and obtaining the best target/non-target value. These measures will enable the clinical use of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody molecular probes as soon as possible, providing a new clinical path for tumor-specific diagnosis, targeted therapy, and efficacy evaluation. The purpose of this review is to describe the application of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody in the imaging and treatment of ovarian cancer, including its potential clinical value and dilemmas.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the disease with the highest mortality rate after cervical cancer secondary to female reproductive tract malignant tumors; in 2020, 313,959 new patients with ovarian cancer and 207,252 new deaths from ovarian cancer were reported worldwide. Although ovarian cancer is generally more common in developed countries, studies have shown an increasing incidence in China (1, 2). Several risk factors for ovarian cancer include genetics, reproduction, sex hormones, and lifestyle behaviors (3). Specifically, a family history of ovarian cancer in first- or second-degree relatives, polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, gynecological inflammation, increased estrogen/androgen, high-fat diet, etc. are associated with a high risk of cancer. However, fertility, contraception including the intrauterine device and oral contraceptives, tubal ligation, and breastfeeding can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer (4–14). Ovarian cancer has an insidious onset and lacks specific clinical symptoms in the early stage, and the clinical diagnostic process is relatively unsatisfactory. Approximately 60% of patients with ovarian cancer are in the advanced stage of the disease by the time symptoms are recognized or medical help is sought. Therefore, the prognosis of patients is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 30% (15, 16).

Overview of HER2 and Affibody

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), also known as receptor tyrosine protein kinase erbB-2, is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family (17). The oncogenic mechanisms of HER2 include inhibiting tumor cell apoptosis, increasing tumor cell invasiveness, promoting tumor cell proliferation, and promoting tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis (18). HER2 is rarely expressed in normal ovarian epithelial cells, but is highly positive in epithelial ovarian cancers, including 45.5% of mucinous carcinomas, 41.7% of clear cell carcinomas, and 17.5% of serous carcinomas (19). Studies confirmed that the positive expression of HER2 is significantly correlated with patient prognosis (20, 21). Therefore, it is significantly important to obtain HER2-positive expression accurately and effectively for the precise diagnosis and targeted therapy of HER2-positive ovarian cancer.

The use of multiple methods to detect the presence of relevant mutations in tumor specimens and the optimal targets of targeted therapy, which are useful for prognosis and treatment, is the best strategy to strengthen and improve patients with ovarian cancer (22–24). Clinically, the state of HER2 expression is often determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on biopsy tissue (25). IHC uses the principle of specific binding of antigen and antibody, and determines the antigen in tissue cells through a chemical reaction to develop the color of the chromogenic reagent labeled with the antibody. However, the stability of this method is poor, and various technical variables, different antibody sensitivities, and resulting evaluation systems during the operation may affect the test results (26). FISH is a molecular cytogenetic technique that uses fluorescent probes that bind only to parts of chromosomes with a high degree of sequence complementarity. DNA is analyzed under the microscope by fluorescence detection (25, 26). By using gene-specific DNA probes to determine the copy number of the HER2 gene, the detection results are reliable due to the relative stability of the DNA; however, this method is expensive and technically complicated. Furthermore, the expression of the protein is regulated by many factors; therefore, the HER2 gene is regulated by many factors and the amplification of the HER2 gene is not always consistent with the overexpression of protein (27, 28). In addition, both IHC and FISH are invasive tests, which only reflect the local situation of the biopsy tissue. These tests cannot reflect the HER2 expression of the tumor as a whole and other metastases. Hillig et al. showed that the misdiagnosis rate of HER2 expression measured by IHC or FISH is 20% (29). Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can obtain functional information about the organization of biological chemistry. Advantages of these methods include noninvasiveness, accuracy, and safety. become one of the hot spot of the HER2 receptor positive tumors. The positive rate of HER2 expression in ovarian cancer is low. Although the nuclear medicine molecular probe targeting the HER2 receptor is not suitable for the screening and diagnosis of ovarian cancer directly, it can be used as an important complementary means to IHC or FISH. This method can obtain a general expression of HER2 positive, including primary tumor location, the extent of the tumor invasion into the surrounding tissue, and the detection of metastasis sites. In addition, targeting the HER2 receptor helps clinicians monitor the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in patients and facilitates stratified patient studies, laying a solid foundation for the integration of ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Affibody is an artificial protein molecule with a single-chain structure, and is a new type of protein ligand that evolved from the B segment of the immunoglobulin binding region of Staphylococcus protein A, with a relative molecular weight of 6.5 kDa. Affibody has the ability to bind to other proteins (30). SPA is a cell wall protein of type A Staphylococcus aureus, containing 7 domains (S, E, D, A, B, C, and X), among which the B domain contains 58 amino acid residues and is the main functional fragment that mediates the binding of SPA to the FC segment of IgG (except IgG3) (31). These amino acid defects constitute three α-helix structures. In 1995, to improve the chemical stability of the affinity body, the Swedish scholar Nord et al. replaced the 29th glycine of the B domain with alanine and renamed it as the Z domain (32). The amino acids at 13 positions in the first and second helices of the Z domain are Q9 (glutamine), Q10 (glutamine), N11 (asparagine), F13 (benzene), Y14 (tyrosine), L17 (leucine), and H18 (histidine) of the first α-helix, and (alanine), E24 (glutamic acid), E25 (glutamic acid), R27 (arginine), N28 (asparagine), Q32 (glutamine), and K35 (lysine) of the second α-helix, which have no obvious effect on the higher-order structure of the Z domain. The Z domain retains the binding function of the Fc segment (33). Random replacement of these 13 amino acid codons with degenerate codon NNK (K = G, Guanylate or T, Thymine, including 32 codons and 20 amino acids) can theoretically generate 3,213 gene sequences and 2,013 amino acid sequences; these constitute the affibody library. The affibody library can basically be combined with any protein molecule, and the affinity body of a certain protein molecule can be obtained after screening (32, 34). In addition to HER2, a variety of proteins such as fibrinogen, transferrin, tumor necrosis factor Q, interleukin-8, CD28, human serum albumin, IgA, IgE, IgM, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been discovered, and their affinity is in the range of μmol/L to pmol/L according to the characteristics of the bound proteins and the structure of the affibody (35). Due to the small size and high affinity of HER2 affibody that can specifically bind to HER2 receptor both in vitro and in vivo, rapid clearance from blood and non-targeted tissues, ease of structural modification, and selectivity for cancer-related targets, this affibody is suitable as a radionuclide molecular probe and has excellent potential for use in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer (36–41). The schematic representation of the HER2 affibody and its interaction with the target molecule, HER2, is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The first-generation HER2 affibody Z_HER2:4 has a low affinity; therefore, researchers combined its head and tail to form a dimer (Z_HER2:4)2, and its dissociation equilibrium constant KD value changed from the original 50 nM to 3 nM, leading to obvious improvement in its affinity (42, 43). The second-generation HER2 affibody is mainly Z_HER2:342, which has a triple-helix structure through modification of the first generation; its affinity is 2,200 times that of the first generation (44). The third-generation affibody is mainly Z_HER2:2395, which is made by introducing a cysteine at the carboxy terminus of Z_HER2:342 to obtain a unique attachment site, using bifunctional chelators, linking molecules or other thiol-reactive carriers, such as maleimide or iodoacetamide, which can be directionally coupled to this particular cysteine. Z_HER2:2395 has an affinity of approximately 27 pM, which is comparable to that of the second generation (45, 46). A recent study reported the replacement of the -NDA-sequence near the C segment of the affibody Z_HER2:2395 with the -SES-sequence, which further improved the stability and hydrophilicity of the affibody, resulting in an affinity that is close to Z_HER2:2395 (47). The detailed evolution process of the affibody is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overview of Radionuclide-Labeled HER2 Affibody Molecular Probes

Molecular probes targeting HER2 affibody can evaluate the expression status of tumor HER2 receptors and predict early efficacy after treatment, and significant progress has been made in the research on the integration of tumor diagnosis and treatment. The main applications of radionuclide-labeled HER2 molecular probes are summarized in Table 1.

HER2 Affibody Molecular Probes as SPECT Tracers

[¹¹¹In]: Indium-11 (¹¹¹In) is a pure γ-ray emitter with a half-life of 2.81 days, making it an ideal radionuclide tracer for SPECT imaging. Benzyl-dtpa,-CHX-A”-DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) and DOTA (1,4,7,l0-tetraazacyclodo-decane-N,N,N,N-tetra acetic acid) have been used as chelating agents for affibody Z_HER2:342. When labeled with ¹¹¹In, which showed a good labeling yield (>95%) and a high affinity (21-65 pM), the molecular probe with specific uptake by the SKOV3 ovarian cancer xenograft tumor tissues with high HER2 receptor expression showed high tumor targeting binding properties (48–52). Unfortunately, in addition to tumor uptake of these molecular probes, renal uptake is also high, increasing the potential for renal toxicity. Based on this disadvantage, Honarvar et al. (76) designed a 15-mer HP1 PNA recognition tag and a complementary HP2 hybridization probe ¹¹¹In-Z_HER2:342-SR-HP1 to reduce the uptake of the molecular probe in the kidney. Moreover, a number of studies have used DOTA as a chelating agent to bind to the affibodies Z_HER2:342min, Z_HER2:2395, and Z_HER2:2395-Cys, and then labeled with the radionuclide ¹¹¹In. This method shows good potential for targeted imaging (77–80). However, one disadvantage of using DOTA as a chelator is that the liver uptake is relatively high. Researchers then compared the results of using DOTAGA (2-[1,4,7,10-Tetraazacyclododecane-4,7,10-tris(t-butyl acetate)]-pentanedioic acid-1t-butyl ester) instead of DOTA as a chelator, and found that the change improved the biodistribution of molecular probes in vivo, reducing uptake by the liver (81).

[^99mTc]: Technetium-99m (^99mTc) emits γ-rays of 140 keV and has a half-life of 6.02 h. It can be obtained by the ⁹⁹Mo-^99mTc generator and is inexpensive; therefore, it is widely used in clinical and basic research. An early study used the indirect labeling method to add chelating agent maGGG (mercaptoacetyl-glycyl-glycyl-glycyl) to the N-terminal of the affibody Z_HER2:342, and successfully labeled affibody Z_HER2:342 with ^99mTc. The researchers further completed a series of in vivo biodistribution and imaging studies, and the results showed that the molecular probe was specifically absorbed by SKOV3 ovarian cancer xenograft tumor with high expression of the HER2 receptor and high targeting ability (79). However, the liver and gastrointestinal tract uptake of this molecular probe is high, thus affecting the detection rate of abdominal lesions. Subsequently, the research team replaced the chelating agent maGGG with maGSG (mercaptoacetyl-glycyl-seryl-glycyl), maG(D-S)G (mercaptoacetyl-glycyl-D-seryl-glycyl), and maSSS (mercaptoacetyl-seryl-seryl-seryl), respectively, and labeled it with ^99mTc. Results showed that when the glycine residue in the chelating agent maSSS was replaced with a hydrophilic serine amino group, the hydrophilic activity of the chelating agent maGGG was increased. Therefore, the uptake of the molecular probe in the liver and gastrointestinal tract was significantly reduced, resulting in a significant increase in the detection rate of abdominal tumor lesions. However, the excretion route was shifted from the liver to the kidney, increasing the potential for kidney toxicity (80). To overcome this shortcoming, the team further optimized the study design and compared the ^99mTc labeling studies using maGEG (mercaptoacetyl-Gly-Glu-Gly), maEEE (Mercaptoacetyl-Glu-Glu-G1u), maESE (mercaptoacetyl-glutamyl-seryl-glutamyl), maEES (mercaptoacetyl-glutamyl-glutamyl-seryl), maSEE (mercaptoacetyl-seryl-glutamyl-glutamyl), maSKS (mercaptoacetyl-seryl-lysyl-seryl), and maKKK (mercaptoacetyl-trilysyl) as chelators. The results showed that the use of the molecular probes ^99mTc-maEEE-Z_HER2:342, ^99mTc-maSKS-Z_HER2:342, and ^99mTc-maESE-Z_HER2:342 with maEEE, maSKS, and maESE as chelators significantly reduced the radioactive uptake in the kidney. In addition, the radioactive uptake of ^99mTc- maESE-Z_HER2:342 was found to be the most obvious, further improving the abdominal image quality (55, 56, 81). Furthermore, other studies introduced a chelating agent at the C-terminus or/and N-terminus of the affibody Z_HER2:342 for ^99mTc labeling, and obtained molecular probes ^99mTc-(HE)₃-Z_HER2:342-GGGC, ^99mTc-Z_HER2:342-GGGC, ^99mTc-Z_HER2:V2, etc. The researchers performed in vivo biodistribution and imaging studies, and results showed that these molecular probes are stable in vitro and in vivo, with high specificity and high targeting (82–84).

[¹²³I/¹²⁵I]: Iodine-123 (¹²³I) has a half-life of 13.3 h and can emit 159 keV γ rays, which is suitable for SPECT imaging. ¹²⁵I has a long half-life (59.4 days) and is a convenient replacement nuclide usually used in the development of radioactive iodization technology instead of ¹²³I and ¹²⁴I (85). An early study used ¹²⁵I labeling for the affibody (Z_HER2:4)2, but SPECT imaging showed high radioactivity retention in the kidney and liver in addition to tumor uptake. This resulted in substandard image quality (86). To address the prevention of affibody destruction by radionuclides upon labeling, further studies were performed with iodobenzoate (PIB) and [4-isothiocyanate-amino]-undecahydro-o-dodecaborate (DABI) as chelators to label affibody molecule Z_HER2:342 with ¹²⁵I, and molecular probes ¹²⁵I-PIB-Z_HER2:342 and ¹²⁵I-DABI-Z_HER2:342 were prepared. Results showed that ¹²⁵I-PIB-Z_HER2:342 expressed high contrast imaging and low renal radioretention of HER2 in the mice bearing SKOV-3 xenografts; however, a disadvantage was that the molecular probe did not bind specifically to the tumor (44, 87). Subsequently, the team used HPEM(4-hydroxyphenyl-ethyl-maleimide) as a chelating agent to design and synthesize the molecular probe ¹³¹I/¹²⁵I-HPEM-Z_HER2:342-C. Compared with the previous molecular probe ¹²⁵I-PIB-Z_HER2:342, HPEM provided a site-specific conjugate for indirect radioiodination of cysteine-containing affibody Z_HER2:342, and preserved the specificity of binding to HER2-expressing cells (88). Several studies have shown that the labeling strategy of using HPEM as a chelator further reduces renal uptake, but increases hepatobiliary and gastric uptake; thus, this strategy is detrimental to the detection of abdominal metastases (85, 87, 88). To solve this problem, the HEHEHE sequence was recently introduced into the amino terminal of the affibody, and the molecular probe ¹²⁵I-PIB-(HE)₃-G₃ was prepared by using PIB as a chelating agent. This process reduces the radioactive retention of the liver and kidney while maintaining the highly specific binding of tumor cells, and enables the obtainment of high contrast imaging of tumors expressing HER2 receptor in vivo (89).

HER2 Affibody Molecular Probes as PET Tracers

PET can provide molecular information such as function and metabolism, and has important clinical value in early diagnosis, staging and restaging of tumors, finding primary tumor or metastases, guiding tumor treatment, evaluating treatment efficacy, and predicting recurrence (90). Compared with SPECT imaging, PET imaging has the advantages of high spatial resolution, good sensitivity, and quantification (91). The radionuclide fluorine-18 (¹⁸F), gallium-68 (⁶⁸Ga), copper-64 (⁶⁴Cu), rhenium-186/188 (^186/188Re), and other labeled HER2 affibodies have been used in preclinical research on ovarian cancer, showing good prospects for clinical application (54, 67, 68, 78, 92–97).

[¹⁸F]: The half-life of ¹⁸F is 109.8 min, and the positron energy produced by ¹⁸F is low (average of 0.25 MeV). Its annihilation distance in tissues is short (approximately 2.4 mm), which enables the obtainment of high-resolution images. Therefore, ¹⁸F is considered as the most ideal nuclide for PET imaging. An early study used FBO (N-[4-flfluorobenzylidene]oxime) as a chelating agent to label the affibody Z_HER2:477 to obtain the molecular probe ¹⁸F-FBO-Z_HER2:477. The results of animal PET imaging showed that the molecular probe can specifically bind to the HER2 receptor in vitro and in vivo, and obvious radionuclide uptake can be seen in the SKOV3 tumor tissue. However, due to the large amount of radioactive retention in the liver and kidney, the molecular probe is not clinically applicable (94). Kramer-Marek et al. used N-[2-(4-fluoro-benzamido)ethyl] maleimide (FBEM) as a chelating agent to prepare the molecular probe ¹⁸F-FBEM-Z_HER2:342, and animal PET imaging results showed that the molecular probe had high radiation uptake and high image contrast in mice bearing SKBR3 and SKOV-3 xenografts with high HER2 expression, but no obvious uptake in mice bearing MDA-MB-468 xenografts with low HER2 expression. However, the high radioactive uptake in the kidney and bone also limits its clinical application (67). Recently, researchers have used FET (fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine) as a linker to prepare a molecular probe [¹⁸F]FET-Z_HER2:342, and a preclinical study has shown that the molecular probe specifically binds to tumors and has a lower radioactive uptake in the liver. Unfortunately, its radiochemical yield is relatively low (68). Moreover, different methods of ¹⁸F labeling for Z_HER2:2395 and Z_HER2:2891 have been reported, but their clinical transformation has been hindered by a large amount of radioactive retention in the kidney or the complex manufacturing process and low yield of molecular probes (62, 63, 73 ).

[⁶⁸Ga]: The half-life of ⁶⁸Ga is 68 min, and the positron decay rate is 89%. ⁶⁸Ga can be prepared by a ⁶⁸Ge-⁶⁸Ga generator. It is suitable for labeling small molecules that can rapidly distribute in vivo and reach the target, and high-quality images can be obtained approximately 1 h after intravenous injection. An early animal study of PET imaging used DOTA as a chelating agent to label the HER2 affibody Z_HER2:342 and the small-molecule protein MUT-DS of HER2, respectively, with ⁶⁸Ga (69). The results showed that the tumor tissue with high expression of HER2 receptor showed obvious radionuclide aggregation, which was quickly cleared in the blood, with low background and high image quality. However, the disadvantage was that there was also a high radioactive uptake in the kidney. Recently, a number of studies have successively used DOTA, NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N,N-triacetic acid), and NODAGA [1-(1,3-carboxypropyl)-4,7-carboxymethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane] as chelating agents to label the affibodies Z_HER2:S1, Z_HER2:2395, and Z_HER2:2891, respectively, and performed molecular probe research in vivo and in vitro. The results showed that NODAGA as a chelator for ⁶⁸Ga-labeled synthesis of molecular probes provided the best tumor-to-organ ratio, and was the best chelator for ⁶⁸Ga-labeled HER2 affibody, indicating excellent prospects for clinical application (81, 92, 93).

[⁶⁴Cu]:⁶⁴Cu can simultaneously release β^- with a maximum energy of 580 keV and β⁺ with a maximum energy of 656 keV, which can be used for PET imaging and radionuclide therapy. The half-life of ⁶⁴Cu is 12.7 h, and it can be produced by nuclear reactors and medical accelerators (98, 99). Researchers first used DOTA as a chelating agent to label the affibody Z_HER2:477 with ⁶⁴Cu and performed PET imaging studies in tumor-bearing nude mice with high HER2 receptor expression. The results showed that the molecular probe can be significantly taken up by tumor tissue. However, the disadvantage is that there is also a large amount of aggregation in the liver and kidney, and the uptake of radioactivity in liver and kidney is significantly higher than that in tumor tissue, thus affecting the detection of abdominal lesions (100). Subsequently, the research team further introduced cysteine into different positions of the affibody Z_HER2:342 for ⁶⁴Cu labeling to prepare molecular probes ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-Cys-Z_HER2:342, ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-Z_HER2:342(Cys39), and ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-Z_HER2:342-Cys. All three probes showed good affinity and stability in in vitro studies, and ⁶⁴Cu-DOTA-Cys-Z_HER2:342 had the highest affinity and in vivo stability. However, the problem of high renal radioactivity retention remained unresolved (72). In addition, some researchers conducted in vitro and in vivo studies and compared the use of NOTA and NODAGA as chelators for ⁶⁴Cu labeling of affibodies. The results showed that the tumor-to-organ ratio was higher when NODAGA was used as a chelator than when NOTA was used as a chelator. The disadvantage was that the molecular probes had higher radioactive retention in the kidney and bone marrow (101). Therefore, research of ⁶⁴Cu-labeled HER2 affibody molecular probe needs to be further optimized and perfected.

[^186/188Re]: The two isotopes of rhenium, ¹⁸⁶Re and ¹⁸⁸Re, can simultaneously emit γ rays and β rays, enabling their use for both imaging and therapy. ¹⁸⁶Re is produced by the reactor and has a half-life of 3.72 days. ¹⁸⁶Re can emit β rays with a maximum energy of 1.08 MeV and γ rays with an energy of 155 keV at a time. ¹⁸⁸Re has a half-life of 17.0 h, can be produced by a ¹⁸⁸W/¹⁸⁸Re generator, and can emit β rays with a maximum energy of 2.1 MeV and γ rays with an energy of 137 keV. Orlova et al. (102) first used maGGG and maGSG as chelators to label affibody Z_HER2:342 with ¹⁸⁶Re and compared the resulting molecular probe with the ^99mTc-labeled molecular probe. The results showed that the molecular probe ¹⁸⁶Re-maGSG-Z_HER2:342 showed obvious radioactive uptake in the tumors of mice bearing SKOV3 xenografts at 4 h after injection. Compared with the ^99mTc-labeled molecular probe, the ¹⁸⁶Re-labeled molecular imaging probe significantly reduces the renal uptake; its renal uptake is only 1/4 of the ^99mTc-labeled molecular probe. However, the excretion of molecular probes through the hepatobiliary tract leads to relatively high uptake in the liver, which may affect the detection of liver lesions. Subsequently, the same research team attached different amino acid sequences to the carboxy-terminus to label the affibodies with ¹⁸⁸Re and compared them in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that the uptake of the molecular probe ¹⁸⁸Re-Z_HER2:V2 with GGGC sequence linked to the carboxyl terminus was significantly higher than that of any organ tissue (including liver and kidney) at 4 h after injection. Furthermore, the uptake of the kidney was 5 times lower than that of the tumor, indicating that this molecular probe is a promising candidate for imaging and treatment of tumors with high expression of HER2 receptor (73, 74).

In addition, preclinical studies of PET molecular probes labeled to HER2 affibody by radionuclides such as astatine-211 (²¹¹At), scandium-44 (⁴⁴Sc), zirconium-89 (⁸⁹Zr), and carbon-11 (¹¹C) through different chelating agents in SKOV3 ovarian tumors with high HER2 expression have also been reported in the literature, and the results show good potential for clinical application (103–106).

Radionuclide-Labeled HER2 Affibody as Targeted Therapeutic Probes

Ovarian cancer is traditionally treated with radical tumor resection and platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Most tumors eventually become resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, leading to disease recurrence and progression (107). Recent studies have shown significant efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, especially in patients with germline breast-related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) mutations. However, its clinical application value in patients without BRCA1/2 mutation remains controversial (108–110). The HER2 proto-oncogene is closely related to the occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer; therefore, it provides an ideal target for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, olaparib, and lapatinib are widely approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HER2-positive cancers. However, clinical studies have shown that HER2-poszitive cancers are prone to become resistant to trastuzumab and pertuzumab; resistance mainly involves crosstalk with heterologous receptors, amplification, and the destruction of binding sites to HER2 receptors (111, 112), which may be related to the abnormal activation of the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway leading to PI3KCA mutation, phosphatase, and tensin homologue loss (113–115). It is estimated that approximately half of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer do not respond to trastuzumab (116). Lapatinib has shown positive efficacy in patients with HER2-positive ovarian cancer, but its efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer is only 22% to 30% (117, 118). Therefore, many researchers have recently focused on finding new methods and approaches for the comprehensive treatment of ovarian cancer through radioimmunotherapy. To date, many studies have focused on the targeted therapy of a variety of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody, including lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu), ⁶⁴Cu, and yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y). Nevertheless, studies have shown that molecular probes of the radionuclide ⁶⁴Cu and ⁹⁰Y-labeled HER2 affibody need to be further optimized due to higher radioactive uptake in kidney or bone marrow and longer retention time (100, 119). ¹⁷⁷Lu, with a half-life of 6.7 days, can emit β^- particles with three energies of 498 keV (79.3%), 380 keV (9.1%), and 176 keV (12.2%). Due to its relatively low particle energy, the normal tissue around the lesion is less damaged, making it a very suitable radionuclide for therapy (120). In 2007, Tolmachev et al. first used CHX-A”-DTPA as a chelating agent to label affibody Z_HER2:342 with ¹⁷⁷Lu; the results showed that ¹⁷⁷Lu-CHX-A”-DTPA-ABD-(Z_HER2:342)2 could prevent the growth of SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells highly expressing the HER2 receptor, compared with the control group injected with PBS and simultaneously injected with non-labeled affibody, ¹⁷⁷Lu-CHX-A”-DTPA-ABD-(Z_HER2:342)2 blocking group. The survival time of nude mice injected with ¹⁷⁷Lu-CHX-A”-DTPA-ABD-(Z_HER2:342)2 was significantly prolonged; however, a disadvantage of this affibody is the high radioactive retention in the blood and bone marrow (75). Subsequently, the researchers further linked high-affinity ABD035 to the N-terminus of the affibody Z_HER2:2891 and linked a DOTA derivative maleimide group to the C-terminus, namely, Z_HER2:2891-ABD035-DOTA, and then labeled it with ¹⁷⁷Lu to obtain molecular probe ¹⁷⁷Lu-ABY-027. This was then compared with that of the previous molecular probe ¹⁷⁷Lu-CHX-A”-DTPA-ABD-(Z_HER2:342)2. The results showed that the uptake of the former in the tumor was twice that of the latter, and the radioactive retention in the liver and kidney was significantly reduced (75). To further improve the radioactive uptake of molecular probes by tumors and reduce the radioactive retention of normal organs such as the kidneys, the research team further optimized the molecular probes in a series of studies in which they conducted comparative evaluations in vivo and in vitro. The results showed that the molecular probe [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-HP16, containing 9 nucleic acid bases, has the highest tumor/kidney uptake ratio and is a promising molecular probe for targeted therapy of HER2-positive ovarian cancer (121–123).

Although there are many advantages that make radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibodies particularly suitable for molecular imaging, many challenges and hurdles remain in the development of these affibodies. One disadvantage is that labeling methods can lead to increased lipophilicity, often leading to off-target interactions with normal tissues and binding to blood proteins (124). Another disadvantage may be the bacterial source of the protein scaffold, as repeated use in patient treatment leads to an increased risk of immunogenicity (125).

Discussion

HER2 is found in the cytoplasm of normal cells, mainly in the mitochondrial cristae, with little amounts occurring on the cell membrane; HER2 is found only on the cell membrane in tumor cells. The expression of HER2 in normal ovarian epithelium is very low; however, the expression in epithelial ovarian tumor tissue has been reported to be high at 55 times that of normal ovarian epithelium (126). Epithelial ovarian cancer consists of histological subtypes, which include serous carcinoma (prevalence 75%), mucinous carcinoma (20%), endometrioid carcinoma (2%), and clear cell carcinoma (<1%). Regarding HER2 positivity, serous (29%) and mucinous carcinomas (38%) had higher positivity than endometrioid (20%) and clear cell carcinomas (23.1%), while the differential expressions of HER2 among different tissue types in epithelial ovarian carcinoma were important biomarkers for prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer (127).

Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) labeled with radionuclide ¹⁸F is widely used in clinical practice and has been proved to be highly accurate in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian masses (128, 129). However, a study of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to evaluate the expression status of HER2 receptor has not been reported. Affibody has high affinity for HER2-expressing tumors, low molecular weight, stable biological activity, and fast blood clearance time (130). Recently, the use of molecular probes from radionuclide-labeled affibody has shown promise in tumor molecular imaging research. However, there are many difficulties in the preparation of molecular probes from radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody that need to be addressed to enable more effective use in clinical practice. Most notably, research needs to focus on the reduction of non-specific uptake in the liver, kidney, bone marrow, and gastrointestinal tract. To this end, researchers have modified the amino acid sequence to change the molecular surface charge, lipid solubility, and affinity, and used different radionuclides to optimize the labeling method, improving the specific uptake of molecular probes at the tumor site, reducing the uptake of non-target organs, thereby optimizing the distribution in vivo. Moreover, different chelating agents have been introduced into the radionuclide labeling of HER2 affibody. Increasing the hydrophilicity of the chelating agent can reduce the non-specific uptake of the liver, enable the molecular probe to be excreted through the kidney, reduce the uptake of the gastrointestinal tract, and thus reduce the background of the image, increase the target/non-target ratio, and lead to an improved image. To date, more than 20 chelating agents have been introduced into molecular probes for radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody. The advantages and disadvantages of commonly used chelators are shown in Table 2.

The median survival of patients with ovarian cancer has been significantly improved recently through the introduction of novel drug treatments and minimally invasive surgical techniques (22). However, the symptomatology, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian cancer still pose great challenges. Multidisciplinary cooperation and multiple detection methods are needed to provide gynecological oncologists with as much detailed clinical data as possible to optimally design appropriate treatment plans for each patient (22, 131). HER2 is overexpressed or amplified in various malignancies. Therefore, therapeutic drugs that target the linkage of HER2-positive tumor cells to a peptide with a high affinity for the HER2 receptor should be developed to target a variety of HER2-positive malignancies (132). To date, a variety of HER2-targeting therapeutic drugs have been developed, including HER2 addressing therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies, and affibodies. Several of these drugs have entered the clinical trial stage, and the results of clinical studies have shown that they benefit patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the study and use of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody have been hampered by its short residence time in the blood (133).

In conclusion, the molecular probe of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody can accurately evaluate the expression status of HER2 receptor in epithelial ovarian cancer, which provides favorable conditions for the localization, diagnosis of cancer foci, targeted therapy, and prognosis evaluation. The research and development of new molecular probes for nuclear medicine aims to introduce radionuclides into cancer foci in a targeted manner, display systemic lesions, and kill tumor cells through radionuclides’ radioactivity. Continued progress will result in improved methods for the integration of the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. Nuclear medicine imaging technology is an important imaging method for basic and clinical research on malignant tumors. A variety of radionuclide-labeled HER2 affibody molecular probes have been successfully developed and have shown potential in preclinical experimental studies of ovarian cancer, laying a foundation for multi-center clinical trials. In the future, the research and development of HER2 affibody molecular probes will focus on optimizing the labeling method of radionuclides, using different chelating agents, or modifying the amino acid sequence to further improve the specific uptake of molecular probes in tumor sites, while reducing the uptake of non-target organs, especially in the liver, kidney, bone marrow, and gastrointestinal tract. This will optimize the distribution in the body, and the radionuclide-labeled HER2 small-molecule targeting binding protein can then be used in clinical practice as soon as possible to enable tumor-specific diagnosis, and to promote the evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of targeted therapy drugs objectively at an early stage.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China, NSFC (grant number: 81571712), Zunyi Medical College Research Start Fund 2018ZYFY03, and QianKeHe platform talents [2017] (grant number: 5733-035).

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1

  SungHFerlayJSiegelRLLaversanneMSoerjomataramIJemalAet al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  WangBLiuSZZhengRSZhangFChenWQSunXB. Time Trends of Ovarian Cancer Incidence in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev (2014) 15(1):191–3. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.191

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  HuangZZhengYWenWWuCBaoPWangCet al. Incidence and Mortality of Gynaecological Cancers: Secular Trends in Urban Shanghai, China Over 40 Years. Eur J Cancer (2016) 63:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  WesthoffC. Ovarian Cancer. Annu Rev Publie Health (1996) 17:85–96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.000505

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  HoekstraARodriguezGC. Chemoprevention of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Treat Res (2009) 149:3–34. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-98094-2_1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  HannaLAdamsM. Prevention of Ovarian Cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol (2006) 20:339–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.10.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  ShanWLiuJ. Inflammation: A Hidden Path to Breaking the Spell of Ovarian Cancer. Cell Cycle (2009) 8:3107–11. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.19.9590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  ToriolaATGrankvistKAgborsangayaCBLukanovaALehtinenMSurcelHM. Changes in Pre-Diagnostic Serum C-Reactive Protein Concentrations and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Longitudinal Study. Ann Oncol (2011) 22(8):1916–21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq694

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  LinHWTuYYLinSYSuWJLinWLLinWZet al. Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Women With Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: A Population-Based Study. Lancet Oncol (2011) 12(9):900–4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70165-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ChittendenBGFullertonGMaheshwariABhattacharyaS. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Risk of Gynaecological Cancer: A Systematic Review. Reprod BioMed Online (2009) 19(3):398–405. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60175-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  Al-SabbaghMLamEWBrosensJJ. Mechanisms of Endometrial Progesterone Resistance. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2012) 358(2):208–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.10.035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  WhitemanDCSiskindVPurdieDMGreenAC. Timing of Pregnancy and the Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2003) 12(1):42–6.

  • Google Scholar

• 13

  Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian CancerBeralVDollRHermonCPetoRReevesG. Ovarian Cancer and Oral Contraceptives: Collaborative Reanalysis of Data From 45 Epidemiological Studies Including 23,257 Women With Ovarian Cancer and 87,303 Controls. Lancet (2008) 371(9609):303–14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60167-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  DanforthKNTworogerSSHechtJLRosnerBAColditzGAHankinsonSE. Breastfeeding and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Two Prospective Cohorts. Cancer Causes Control (2007) 18(5):517–23. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-0130-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  TerryKLSchockHFortnerRTHüsingAFichorovaRNYamamotoHSet al. A Prospective Evaluation of Early Detection Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer in the European EPIC Cohort. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22(18):4664–75. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  MathieuKBBediDGThrowerSLQayyumABastRCJr.. Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Imaging Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol (2018) 51(3):293–303. doi: 10.1002/uog.17557

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  SchechterALSternDFVaidyanathanLDeckerSJDrebinJAGreeneMIet al. The Neu Oncogene: An Erb-B-Related Gene Encoding a 185,000-Mr Tumour Antigen. Nature (1984) 312(5994):513–6. doi: 10.1038/312513a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  ConnellCMDohertyGJ. Activating HER2 Mutations as Emerging Targets in Multiple Solid Cancers. ESMO Open (2017) 2(5):e000279. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000279

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  LeeESLeeYSuhDKangJKimI. Detection of HER-2 and EGFR Gene Amplification Using Chromogenic in-Situ Hybridization Technique in Ovarian Tumors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol (2010) 18(1):69–74. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3181af7d3f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  CorkeryDPLe PageCMeunierLProvencherDMes-MassonAMDellaireG. PRP4K Is a HER2-Regulated Modifier of Taxane Sensitivity. Cell Cycle (2015) 14(7):1059–69. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1007775

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  ClovenNGKyshtoobayevaABurgerRAYuIRFruehaufJP. In Vitro Chemoresistance and Biomarker Profiles are Unique for Histologic Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2004) 92(1):160–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  FalzoneLScandurraGLombardoVGattusoGLavoroADistefanoABet al. A Multidisciplinary Approach Remains the Best Strategy to Improve and Strengthen the Management of Ovarian Cancer (Review). Int J Oncol (2021) 59(1):53. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5233

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  OrrBEdwardsRP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am (2018) 32(6):943–64. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  DilleyJBurnellMGentry-MaharajARyanANeophytouCApostolidouSet al. Ovarian Cancer Symptoms, Routes to Diagnosis and Survival - Population Cohort Study in the ‘No Screen’ Arm of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Gynecol Oncol (2020) 158(2):316–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  MoelansCBde WegerRAvan der WallEvan DiestPJ. Current Technologies for HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2011) 80(3):380–92. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.12.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  SchlüterBGerhardsRStrumbergDVoigtmannR. Combined Detection of Her2/neu Gene Amplification and Protein Overexpression in Effusions From Patients With Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2010) 136(9):1389–400. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0790-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  JiangDImHJSunHValdovinosHFEnglandCGEhlerdingEBet al. Radiolabeled Pertuzumab for Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression in Ovarian Cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2017) 44(8):1296–305. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3663-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  SchlüterBGerhardsRStrumbergDVoigtmannR. Combined Detection of Her2/neu Gene Amplification and Protein Overexpression in Effusions From Patients With Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2010) 136(9):1389–400. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0790-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  HilligTThodeJBreinholtMFFranzmannMBPedersenCLundFet al. Assessing HER2 Amplification by IHC, FISH, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis (Real-Time PCR) Following LCM in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissue From 40 Women With Ovarian Cancer. APMIS (2012) 120(12):1000–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02929.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  NilssonBMoksTJanssonBAbrahmsénLElmbladAHolmgrenEet al. A Synthetic IgG-Binding Domain Based on Staphylococcal Protein a. Protein Eng (1987) 1(2):107–13. doi: 10.1093/protein/1.2.107

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  BraistedACWellsJA. Minimizing a Binding Domain From Protein a. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1996) 93(12):5688–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5688

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  NordKNilssonJNilssonBUhlénMNygrenPA. A Combinatorial Library of an Alpha-Helical Bacterial Receptor Domain. Protein Eng (1995) 8(6):601–8. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.6.601

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  LöfblomJFeldwischJTolmachevVCarlssonJStåhlSFrejdFY. Affibody Molecules: Engineered Proteins for Therapeutic, Diagnostic and Biotechnological Applications. FEBS Lett (2010) 584(12):2670–80. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  NordKGunneriussonERingdahlJStåhlSUhlénMNygrenPA. Binding Proteins Selected From Combinatorial Libraries of an Alpha-Helical Bacterial Receptor Domain. Nat Biotechnol (1997) 15(8):772–7. doi: 10.1038/nbt0897-772

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  NygrenPA. Alternative Binding Proteins: Affibody Binding Proteins Developed From a Small Three-Helix Bundle Scaffold. FEBS J (2008) 275(11):2668–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06438.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  JamousMHaberkornUMierW. Synthesis of Peptide Radiopharmaceuticals for the Therapy and Diagnosis of Tumor Diseases. Molecules (2013) 18(3):3379–409. doi: 10.3390/molecules18033379

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  WeidleUHAuerJBrinkmannUGeorgesGTiefenthalerG. The Emerging Role of New Protein Scaffold-Based Agents for Treatment of Cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics (2013) 10(4):155–68.

  • Google Scholar

• 38

  AntunesPGinjMWalterMA. Influence of Different Spacers on the Biological Profile of a DOTA-Somatostatin Analogue. Bioconjug Chem (2007) 18(1):84–92. doi: 10.1021/bc0601673

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  StåhlSGräslundTEriksson KarlströmAFrejdFYNygrenPÅLöfblomJ. Affibody Molecules in Biotechnological and Medical Applications. Trends Biotechnol (2017) 35(8):691–712. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  BaumRPPrasadVMüllerDSchuchardtCOrlovaAWennborgAet al. Molecular Imaging of HER2-Expressing Malignant Tumors in Breast Cancer Patients Using Synthetic 111In or 68Ga 1abeled Affibody Molecules. J Nucl Med (2010) 51(6):892–97. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073239

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  SörensenJSandbergDSandströmMWennborgAFeldwischJTolmachevVet al. First-In-Human Molecular Imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer Metastases Using the 111In-ABY-025 Affibody Molecule. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(5):730–5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.131243

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  SteffenACWikmanMTolmachevVAdamsGPNilssonFYStåhlSet al. In Vitro Characterization of a Bivalent Anti-HER-2 Affibody With Potential for Radionuclide-Based Diagnostics. Cancer Biother Radiopharm (2005) 20(3):239–48. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2005.20.239

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  SteffenACOrlovaAWikmanMNilssonFYStåhlSAdamsGPet al. Affibody-Mediated Tumour Targeting of HER-2 Expressing Xenografts in Mice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2006) 33(6):631–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0012-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  OrlovaAMagnussonMErikssonTLNilssonMLarssonBHöidén-GuthenbergIet al. Tumor Imaging Using a Picomolar Affinity HER2 Binding Affibody Molecule. Cancer Res (2006) 66(8):4339–48. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3521

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  AhlgrenSOrlovaARosikDSandströmMSjöbergABaastrupBet al. Evaluation of Maleimide Derivative of DOTA for Site-Specific Labeling of Recombinant Affibody Molecules. Bioconjug Chem (2008) 19(1):235–43. doi: 10.1021/bc700307y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  AltaiMPerolsAKarlströmAESandströmMBoschettiFOrlovaAet al. Preclinical Evaluation of Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecules Site-Specifically Labeled With 111In Using a Maleimido Derivative of NODAGA. Nucl Med Biol (2012) 39(4):518–29. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.10.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  OroujeniMRinneSSVorobyevaALofteniusAFeldwischJJonassonPet al. Preclinical Evaluation of 99mtc-ZHER2:41071, a Second-Generation Affibody-Based HER2-Visualizing Imaging Probe With a Low Renal Uptake. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(5):2770. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052770

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  TolmachevVVelikyanISandströmMOrlovaA. A HER2-Binding Affibody Molecule Labelled With 68Ga for PET Imaging: Direct In Vivo Comparison With the 111In-Labelled Analogue. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2010) 37(7):1356–67. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1367-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  WållbergHOrlovaA. Slow Internalization of Anti-HER2 Synthetic Affibody Monomer 111In-DOTA-ZHER2:342-Pep2: Implications for Development of Labeled Tracers. Cancer Biother Radiopharm (2008) 23(4):435–42. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2008.0464

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  TolmachevVNilssonFYWidströmCAnderssonKRosikDGeddaLet al. 111In-Benzyl-DTPA-ZHER2:342, an Affibody-Based Conjugate for In Vivo Imaging of HER2 Expression in Malignant Tumors. J Nucl Med (2006) 47(5):846–53.

  • Google Scholar

• 51

  RosikDOrlovaAMalmbergJAltaiMVarastehZSandströmMet al. Direct Comparison of 111In-Labelled Two-Helix and Three-Helix Affibody Molecules for In Vivo Molecular Imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2012) 39(4):693–702. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2016-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  OrlovaARosikDSandströmMLundqvistHEinarssonLTolmachevV. Evaluation of [(111/114m)In]CHX-A”-DTPA-ZHER2:342, an Affibody Ligand Coniugate for Targeting of HER2-Expressing Malignant Tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2007) 51(4):314–23.

  • Google Scholar

• 53

  BaumRPPrasadVMullerDSchuchardtCOrlovaAWennborgAet al. Molecular Imaging of HER2-Expressing Malignant Tumors in Breast Cancer Patients Using Synthetic 111In- or 68Ga-Labeled Affibody Molecules. J Nucl Med (2010) 51(6):892–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073239

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  AltaiMPerolsAKarlströmAESandströmMBoschettiFOrlovaAet al. Preclinical Evaluation of Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecules Site-Specifically Labeled With 111In Using a Maleimido Derivative of NODAGA. Nucl Med Biol (2012) 39(4):518–29. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.10.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  EngfeldtTOrlovaATranTBruskinAWidströmCKarlströmAEet al. Imaging of HER2-Expressing Tumours Using a Synthetic Affibody Molecule Containing the 99mtc-Chelating Mercaptoacetyl-Glycyl-Glycyl-Glycyl (MAG3) Sequence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2007) 34(5):722–33. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0266-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  TranTEngfeldtTOrlovaASandströmMFeldwischJAbrahmsénLet al. (99m)Tc-maEEE-Z(HER2:342), an Affibody Molecule-Based Tracer for the Detection of HER2 Expression in Malignant Tumors. Bioconjug Chem (2007) 18(6):1956–64. doi: 10.1021/bc7002617

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  EngfeldtTTranTOrlovaAWidströmCFeldwischJAbrahmsenLet al. 99mtc-Chelator Engineering to Improve Tumour Targeting Properties of a HER2-Specific Affibody Molecule. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2007) 34(11):1843–53. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0474-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  EkbladTTranTOrlovaAWidströmCFeldwischJAbrahmsénLet al. Development and Preclinical Characterisation of 99mtc-Labelled Affibody Molecules With Reduced Renal Uptake. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2008) 35(12):2245–55. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0845-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  TranTAEkbladTOrlovaASandströmMFeldwischJWennborgAet al. Effects of Lysine-Containing Mercaptoacetyl-Based Chelators on the Biodistribution of 99mtc-Labeled Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecules. Bioconjug Chem (2008) 19(12):2568–76. doi: 10.1021/bc800244b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  HanJZhaoYZhaoXMaTHaoTLiuJet al. Therapeutic Efficacy and Imaging Assessment of the HER2-Targeting Chemotherapy Drug ZHER2:V2-Pemetrexed in Lung Adenocarcinoma Xenografts. Invest New Drugs (2020) 38(4):1031–43. doi: 10.1007/s10637-019-00876-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  JiaoHZhaoXLiuJMaTZhangZZhangJet al. In Vivo Imaging Characterization and Anticancer Efficacy of a Novel HER2 Affibody and Pemetrexed Conjugate in Lung Cancer Model. Nucl Med Biol (2019) 68-69:31–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.11.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  WållbergHOrlovaAAltaiMHosseinimehrSJWidströmCMalmbergJet al. Molecular Design and Optimization of 99mtc-Labeled Recombinant Affibody Molecules Improves Their Biodistribution and Imaging Properties. J Nucl Med (2011) 52(3):461–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.083592

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  YangYZhaoXXingYYuTZhangJWangJ. Preclinical Evaluation of 99mtc Direct Labeling ZHER2:V2 for HER2 Positive Tumors Imaging. Oncol Lett (2018) 16(4):5361–66. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9279

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  CaiJLiXMaoFWangPLuoYZhengKet al. Non-Invasive Monitoring of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer Patients With 99mtc-Affibody SPECT/Ct. Iran J Radiol (2020) 17(1):e96419. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.96419

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  StrandJNordemanPHonarvarHAltaiMOrlovaALarhedMet al. Site-Specific Radioiodination of HER2-Targeting Affibody Molecules Using 4-Iodophenethylmaleimide Decreases Renal Uptake of Radioactivity. ChemistryOpen (2015) 4(2):174–82. doi: 10.1002/open.201402097

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  Kramer-MarekGBernardoMKiesewetterDOBagciUKubanMArasOet al. PET of HER2-Positive Pulmonary Metastases With 18F-ZHER2:342 Affibody in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer: Comparison With 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med (2012) 53(6):939–46. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.100354

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  Kramer-MarekGKiesewetterDOMartiniovaLJagodaELeeSBCapalaJ. [18f]FBEM-Z(HER2:342)-Affibody Molecule-a New Molecular Tracer for In Vivo Monitoring of HER2 Expression by Positron Emission Tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2008) 35(5):1008–18. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0658-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  YanaiAHaradaRIwataRYoshikawaTIshikawaYFurumotoSet al. Site-Specific Labeling of F-18 Proteins Using a Supplemented Cell-Free Protein Synthesis System and O-2-[18f]Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine: [18f]FET-HER2 Affibody Molecule. Mol Imaging Biol (2019) 21(3):529–37. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1266-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  RenGZhangRLiuZWebsterJMMiaoZGambhirSSet al. A 2-Helix Small Protein Labeled With 68Ga for PET Imaging of HER2 Expression. J Nucl Med (2009) 50(9):1492–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.064287

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  SandstromMLindskogKVelikyanIWennborgAFeldwischJSandbergDet al. Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of the Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecule 68Ga-ABY-025 in Breast Cancer Patients. J Nucl Med (2016) 57(6):867–71. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169342

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  SorensenJVelikyanISandbergDWennborgAFeldwischJTolmachevVet al. Measuring HER2-Receptor Expression in Metastatic Breast Cancer Using [68Ga]ABY-025 Affibody PET/Ct. Theranostics (2016) 6(2):262–71. doi: 10.7150/thno.13502

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  QiSHoppmannSXuYChengZ. PET Imaging of HER2-Positive Tumors With Cu-64-Labeled Affibody Molecules. Mol Imaging Biol (2019) 21(5):907–16. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-01310-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  AltaiMWållbergHHonarvarHStrandJOrlovaAVarastehZet al. 188Re-ZHER2:V2, a Promising Affibody-Based Targeting Agent Against HER2-Expressing Tumors: Preclinical Assessment. J Nucl Med (2014) 55(11):1842–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.140194

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  AltaiMHonarvarHWållbergHStrandJVarastehZRosestedtMet al. Selection of an Optimal Cysteine-Containing Peptide-Based Chelator for Labeling of Affibody Molecules With (188)Re. Eur J Med Chem (2014) 87:519–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.09.082

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  TolmachevVOrlovaAPehrsonRGalliJBaastrupBAnderssonKet al. Radionuclide Therapy of HER2-Positive Microxenografts Using a 177Lu-Labeled HER2-Specific Affibody Molecule. Cancer Res (2007) 67(6):2773–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1630

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  HonarvarHWesterlundKAltaiMSandströmMOrlovaATolmachevVet al. Feasibility of Affibody Molecule-Based PNA-Mediated Radionuclide Pretargeting of Malignant Tumors. Theranostics (2016) 6(1):93–103. doi: 10.7150/thno.12766

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  AhlgrenSOrlovaAWållbergHHanssonMSandströmMLewsleyRet al. Targeting of HER2-Expressing Tumors Using 111In-ABY-025, a Second-Generation Affibody Molecule With a Fundamentally Reengineered Scaffold. J Nucl Med (2010) 51(7):1131–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073346

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  HeskampSLavermanPRosikDBoschettiFvan der GraafWTOyenWJet al. Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Expression With 18F-Labeled Affibody Molecule ZHER2:2395 in a Mouse Model for Ovarian Cancer. J Nucl Med (2012) 53(1):146–53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  TolmachevVXuHWållbergHAhlgrenSHjertmanMSjöbergAet al. Evaluation of a Maleimido Derivative of CHX-A” DTPA for Site-Specific Labeling of Affibody Molecules. Bioconjug Chem (2008) 19(8):1579–87. doi: 10.1021/bc800110y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  AltaiMVarastehZAnderssonKEekABoermanOOrlovaA. In Vivo and In Vitro Studies on Renal Uptake of Radiolabeled Affibody Molecules for Imaging of HER2 Expression in Tumors. Cancer Biother Radiopharm (2013) 28(3):187–95. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1304

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  WesterlundKHonarvarHNorrströmEStrandJMitranBOrlovaAet al. Increasing the Net Negative Charge by Replacement of DOTA Chelator With DOTAGA Improves the Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Second-Generation Synthetic Affibody Molecules. Mol Pharm (2016) 13(5):1668–78. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00089

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  LindbergHHofströmCAltaiMHonorvarHWållbergHOrlovaAet al. Evaluation of a HER2-Targeting Affibody Molecule Combining an N-Terminal HEHEHE-Tag With a GGGC Chelator for 99mtc-Labelling at the C Terminus. Tumour Biol (2012) 33(3):641–51. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0305-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  WållbergHOrlovaAAltaiMHosseinimehrSJWidströmCMalmbergJet al. Molecular Design and Optimization of 99mtc-Labeled Recombinant Affibody Molecules Improves Their Biodistribution and Imaging Properties. J Nucl Med (2011) 52(3):461–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.083592

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  YangYZhaoXXingYYuTZhangJWangJ. Preclinical Evaluation of 99mtc Direct Labeling ZHER2:V2 for HER2 Positive Tumors Imaging. Oncol Lett (2018) 16(4):5361–6. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9279

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  StrandJNordemanPHonarvarHAltaiMOrlovaALarhedMet al. Site-Specific Radioiodination of HER2-Targeting Affibody Molecules Using 4-Iodophenethylmaleimide Decreases Renal Uptake of Radioactivity. ChemistryOpen (2015) 4(2):174–82. doi: 10.1002/open.201402097

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  SteffenACOrlovaAWikmanMNilssonFYStåhlSAdamsGPet al. Affibody-Mediated Tumour Targeting of HER-2 Expressing Xenografts in Mice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2006) 33(6):631–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0012-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  TranTOrlovaASivaevISandströmMTolmachevV. Comparison of Benzoate- and Dodecaborate-Based Linkers for Attachment of Radioiodine to HER2-Targeting Affibody Ligand. Int J Mol Med (2007) 19(3):485–93. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.19.3.485

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  TolmachevVMumeESjöbergSFrejdFYOrlovaA. Influence of Valency and Labelling Chemistry on In Vivo Targeting Using Radioiodinated HER2-Binding Affibody Molecules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2009) 36(4):692–701. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-1003-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  VorobyevaASchulgaARinneSSGüntherTOrlovaADeyevSet al. Indirect Radioiodination of DARPin G3 Using N-Succinimidyl-Para-Iodobenzoate Improves the Contrast of HER2 Molecular Imaging. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(12):3047. doi: 10.3390/ijms20123047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  BeyerTTownsendDWBrunTKinahanPECharronMRoddyRet al. A Combined PET/CT Scanner for Clinical Oncology. J Nucl Med (2000) 41(8):1369–79.

  • Google Scholar

• 91

  VahidfarNFarzanefarSAhmadzadehfarHMolloyENEppardE. A Review of Nuclear Medicine Approaches in the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) (2022) 14(7):1779. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071779

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  AltaiMStrandJRosikDSelvarajuRKEriksson KarlströmAet al. Influence of Nuclides and Chelators on Imaging Using Affibody Molecules: Comparative Evaluation of Recombinant Affibody Molecules Site-Specifically Labeled With ⁶⁸Ga and ¹¹¹In via Maleimido Derivatives of DOTA and NODAGA. Bioconjug Chem (2013) 24(6):1102–9. doi: 10.1021/bc300678y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  StrandJHonarvarHPerolsAOrlovaASelvarajuRKKarlströmAEet al. Influence of Macrocyclic Chelators on the Targeting Properties of (68)Ga-Labeled Synthetic Affibody Molecules: Comparison With (111)In-Labeled Counterparts. PloS One (2013) 8(8):e70028.

  • Google Scholar

• 94

  ChengZDe JesusOPNamavariMDeALeviJWebsterJMet al. Small-Animal PET Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Expression With Site-Specific 18F-Labeled Protein Scaffold Molecules. J Nucl Med (2008) 49(5):804–13. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047381

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  IvesonPBGlaserMIndrevollBShalesJMantzilasDOmtvedtLet al. FASTlab Radiosynthesis of the 18F-Labelled HER2-Binding Affibody Molecule [18F]GE-226. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm (2019) 62(14):925–32. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3789

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  TrousilSHoppmannSNguyenQDKaliszczakMTomasiGIvesonPet al. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With 18F-Labeled ZHER2:2891 Affibody for Detection of HER2 Expression and Pharmacodynamic Response to HER2-Modulating Therapies. Clin Cancer Res (2014) 20(6):1632–43. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  HeskampSLavermanPRosikDBoschettiFvan der GraafWTOyenWJet al. Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Expression With 18F-Labeled Affibody Molecule ZHER2:2395 in a Mouse Model for Ovarian Cancer. J Nucl Med (2012) 53(1):146–53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  ZinnKRChaudhuriTRChengTPMorrisJSMeyerWAJr.. Production of No-Carrier-Added 64Cu From Zinc Metal Irradiated Under Boron Shielding. Cancer (1994) 73(3 Suppl):774–8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3+<774::AID-CNCR2820731305>3.0.CO;2-L

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  KimJYParkHLeeJCKimKMLeeKCHaHJet al. A Simple Cu-64 Production and Its Application of Cu-64 ATSM. Appl Radiat Isot (2009) 67(7-8):1190–4. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  ChengZDe JesusOPKramerDJDeAWebsterJMGheysensOet al. 64Cu-Labeled Affibody Molecules for Imaging of HER2 Expressing Tumors. Mol Imaging Biol (2010) 12(3):316–24. doi: 10.1007/s11307-009-0256-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  TolmachevVYimCBRajanderJPerolsAKarlströmAEHaaparanta-SolinMet al. Comparative Evaluation of Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecules Labeled With 64Cu Using NOTA and NODAGA. Contrast Media Mol Imaging (2017) 2017:8565802. doi: 10.1155/2017/8565802

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  OrlovaATranTAEkbladTKarlströmAETolmachevV. (186)Re-maSGS-Z (HER2:342), a Potential Affibody Conjugate for Systemic Therapy of HER2-Expressing Tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2010) 37(2):260–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1268-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  SteffenACAlmqvistYChyanMKLundqvistHTolmachevVWilburDSet al. Biodistribution of 211At Labeled HER-2 Binding Affibody Molecules in Mice. Oncol Rep (2007) 17(5):1141–7. doi: 10.3892/or.17.5.1141

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  HonarvarHMüllerCCohrsSHallerSWesterlundKKarlströmAEet al. Evaluation of the First 44Sc-Labeled Affibody Molecule for Imaging of HER2-Expressing Tumors. Nucl Med Biol (2017) 45:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.10.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  XuYWangLPanDYanJWangXYangRet al. Synthesis of a Novel 89Zr-Labeled HER2 Affibody and Its Application Study in Tumor PET Imaging. EJNMMI Res (2020) 10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-00649-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  WållbergHGrafströmJChengQLuLMartinsson AhlzénHSSaménEet al. HER2-Positive Tumors Imaged Within 1 Hour Using a Site-Specifically 11C-Labeled Sel-Tagged Affibody Molecule. J Nucl Med (2012) 53(9):1446–53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.102194

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  PuglisiFMinisiniAMDe AngelisCArpinoG. Overcoming Treatment Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Potential Strategies. Drugs (2012) 72(9):1175–93. doi: 10.2165/11634000-000000000-00000

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  LoizziVRanieriGLaforgiaMGadaletaCDGarganoGKardhashiAet al. PARP Inhibitors and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Development and Future Prospective. Oncol Lett (2020) 20(4):90. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11951

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  LavoroAScalisiACandidoSZanghìGNRizzoRGattusoGet al. Identification of the Most Common BRCA Alterations Through Analysis of Germline Mutation Databases: Is Droplet Digital PCR an Additional Strategy for the Assessment of Such Alterations in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Families? Int J Oncol (2022) 60(5):58. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5349

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  BoussiosSKarathanasiACookeDNeilleCSadauskaiteAMoschettaMet al. PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: The Route to “Ithaca”. Diagnostics (Basel) (2019) 9(2):55. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9020055

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  PuglisiFMinisiniAMDe AngelisCArpinoG. Overcoming Treatment Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Potential Strategies. Drugs (2012) 72(9):1175–93. doi: 10.2165/11634000-000000000-00000

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  PernasSTolaneySM. HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: New Therapeutic Frontiers and Overcoming Resistance. Ther Adv Med Oncol (2019) 11:1758835919833519. doi: 10.1177/1758835919833519

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  HankerABPfefferleADBalkoJMKubaMGYoungCDSánchezVet al. Mutant PIK3CA Accelerates HER2-Driven Transgenic Mammary Tumors and Induces Resistance to Combinations of Anti-HER2 Therapies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013) 110(35):14372–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303204110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  NagataYLanKHZhouXTanMEstevaFJSahinAAet al. PTEN Activation Contributes to Tumor Inhibition by Trastuzumab, and Loss of PTEN Predicts Trastuzumab Resistance in Patients. Cancer Cell (2004) 6(2):117–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  SinghJCJhaveriKEstevaFJ. HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Optimizing Patient Outcomes and Opportunities for Drug Development. Br J Cancer (2014) 111(10):1888–98. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.388

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  SlamonDJLeyland-JonesBShakSFuchsHPatonVBajamondeAet al. Use of Chemotherapy Plus a Monoclonal Antibody Against HER2 for Metastatic Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med (2001) 344(11):783–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  LuiVWLauCPHoKNgMHChengSHTsaoSWet al. Anti-Invasion, Anti-Proliferation and Anoikis-Sensitization Activities of Lapatinib in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells. Invest New Drugs (2011) 29(6):1241–52. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9470-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  WerohaSJObergALZieglerKLDakhilmSRRowlandKMHartmannLCet al. Phase II Trial of Lapatinib and Topotecan (LapTop) in Patients With Platinum-Refractory/Resistant Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol (2011) 122(1):116–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  FortinMAOrlovaAMalmströmPUTolmachevV. Labelling Chemistry and Characterization of [90Y/177Lu]-DOTA-ZHER2:342-3 Affibody Molecule, a Candidate Agent for Locoregional Treatment of Urinary Bladder Carcinoma. Int J Mol Med (2007) 19(2):285–91. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.19.2.285

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  PillaiMRChakrabortySDasTVenkateshMRamamoorthyN. Production Logistics of 177Lu for Radionuclide Therapy. Appl Radiat Isot (2003) 59(2-3):109–18. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(03)00158-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  AltaiMWesterlundKVellettaJMitranBHonarvarHKarlströmAE. Evaluation of Affibody Molecule-Based PNA-Mediated Radionuclide Pretargeting: Development of an Optimized Conjugation Protocol and 177Lu Labeling. Nucl Med Biol (2017) 54:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.07.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  WesterlundKAltaiMMitranBKonijnenbergMOroujeniMAtterbyCet al. Radionuclide Therapy of HER2-Expressing Human Xenografts Using Affibody-Based Peptide Nucleic Acid-Mediated Pretargeting: In Vivo Proof of Principle. J Nucl Med (2018) 59(7):1092–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.208348

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  TanoHOroujeniMVorobyevaAWesterlundKLiuYXuTet al. Comparative Evaluation of Novel 177lu-Labeled PNA Probes for Affibody-Mediated PNA-Based Pretargeting. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(3):500. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030500

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  TolmachevVOrlovaA. Affibody Molecules as Targeting Vectors for PET Imaging. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(3):651. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030651

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  FeldwischJTolmachevV. Engineering of Affibody Molecules for Therapy and Diagnostics. Methods Mol Biol (2012) 899:103–26. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  CongJLiuRHouJWangXJiangHWangJ. Effects of Trastuzumab on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Ovarian Cancer Cells. Neoplasma (2019) 66(2):240–4. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_180724N524

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  ShangAQWuJBiFZhangYJXuLRLiLLet al. Relationship Between HER2 and JAK/STAT-SOCS3 Signaling Pathway and Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Biol Ther (2017) 18(5):314–22. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1310343

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  HuXLiangZZhangCWangGCaiJWangP. The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol (2022) 12:840433. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840433

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  HuXLiDLiangZLiaoYYangLWangRet al. Indirect Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer (2021) 21(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08815-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  HonarvarHJokilaaksoNAnderssonKMalmbergJRosikDOrlovaAet al. Evaluation of Backbone-Cyclized HER2-Binding 2-Helix Affibody Molecule for In Vivo Molecular Imaging. Nucl Med Biol (2013) 40(3):378–86. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.12.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  XuTWangLJiaYJiaZLiZCuiSet al. Long-Term Multidisciplinary Integrative Therapy Management Resulted in Favorable Outcomes for Ovarian Cancer During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Ovarian Res (2019) 12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0584-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  SiavoshiniaLJamalanMZeinaliMPourshohodAKoushkiMMoradipoodehBet al. Improvement of Targeted Chemotherapy of HER2-Positive Ovarian Malignant Cell Line by ZHER2-Idarubicin Conjugate: An In Vitro Study. Iran J Pathol (2021) 16(2):109–18. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.120392.2310

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  AltunayBMorgenrothABeheshtiMVoggAWongNCLTingHHet al. HER2-Directed Antibodies, Affibodies and Nanobodies as Drug-Delivery Vehicles in Breast Cancer With a Specific Focus on Radioimmunotherapy and Radioimmunoimaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2021) 48(5):1371–89. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05094-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar