CORRECTION article

Front. Oncol., 17 July 2023

Sec. Head and Neck Cancer

Volume 13 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1240947

Corrigendum: Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among individuals receiving first-line pembrolizumab therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

  • CM

    Christopher M. Black 1*

  • GJ

    Glenn J. Hanna 2

  • LW

    Liya Wang 1

  • KR

    Karthik Ramakrishnan 1

  • DG

    Daisuke Goto 1

  • VT

    Vladimir Turzhitsky 1

  • GM

    Gleicy M. Hair 1

  • 1. Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States

  • 2. Center for Head & Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States

Article metrics

View details

1

Citations

1,5k

Views

528

Downloads

Error in Figure/Table

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. The mean (SD) for the 1L pembrolizumab + chemotherapy column for CPS<1 should be 18 (16.7), not 18 (6.7) as originally shown. Further, we used the terminology, CPS<1% in the first column and the correct terminology is CPS<1. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

Table 1

Characteristic1L pembrolizumab (all)
(N = 646)
1L pembrolizumab monotherapy
(N = 431)
1L pembrolizumab + chemotherapy
(N = 215)
Age (years)
 Median (95% CI)68.0 (66.8–68.3)69.0 (68.4–70.2)64.0 (62.8–65.3)
 Median (IQR)68.0 (61.0–65.0)69.0 (63.0–78.0)64.0 (59.0–70.0)
Sex
 Male500 (77.4)330 (76.6)170 (79.1)
Race
 White386 (59.8)261 (60.6)125 (58.1)
 Black34 (5.3)21 (4.9)13 (6.0)
 Asian6 (0.9)4 (0.9)2 (0.9)
 Other220 (34.1)145 (33.6)75 (34.9)
Smoking status A
 History of smoking507 (78.5)343 (79.6)164 (76.3)
 No history of smoking138 (21.4)88 (20.4)50 (23.3)
Census region
 South375 (58.0)251 (58.2)124 (57.7)
 Midwest78 (12.1)54 (12.5)24 (11.2)
 West67 (10.4)37 (8.6)30 (14.0)
 Northeast60 (9.3)40 (9.3)20 (9.3)
 Unknown/not documented66 (10.2)49 (11.4)17 (7.9)
Practice type
 Community583 (90.2)384 (89.1)199 (92.6)
 Academic57 (8.8)43 (10.0)14 (6.5)
 Both6 (0.9)4 (0.9)2 (0.9)
Primary tumor site(s)
 Oropharynx297 (46.0)193 (44.8)104 (48.4)
 Larynx166 (25.7)120 (27.8)46 (21.4)
 Oral cavity138 (21.4)89 (20.6)49 (22.8)
 Hypopharynx35 (5.4)23 (5.3)12 (5.6)
 Other B10 (1.5)6 (1.4)4 (1.9)
Disease status
 Distant metastatic disease (HNSCC with distant recurrence OR Stage IVc at initial diagnosis)367 (56.8)238 (55.2)129 (60.0)
 HNSCC with locoregional recurrence C149 (23.1)106 (24.6)43 (20.0)
 HNSCC not cured at initial diagnosis106 (16.4)77 (17.9)29 (13.5)
 HPV-positive Stage IV oropharyngeal tumor at initial diagnosis24 (3.7)10 (2.3)14 (6.5)
Stage at initial diagnosis
 I–II115 (17.8)88 (20.4)27 (12.6)
 III–IVB326 (50.5)232 (53.8)94 (43.7)
 IV24 (3.7)10 (2.3)14 (6.5)
 IVc92 (14.2)41 (9.5)51 (23.7)
 Unknown/not documented89 (13.8)60 (13.9)29 (13.5)
ECOG PS on index date
 0–1427 (66.1)265 (61.5)162 (75.3)
 2–4135 (20.9)103 (23.9)32 (14.9)
 Unknown/not documented84 (13.0)63 (14.6)21 (9.8)
HPV status (all subtypes)
 Positive233 (36.1)163 (37.8)70 (32.6)
 Negative258 (39.9)165 (38.3)93 (43.3)
 Equivocal or unknown155 (24.0)103 (24.9)52 (24.2)
HPV status (oropharynx subtype only)N = 297N = 193N = 104
 Positive192 (64.6)137 (71.0)55 (52.9)
 Negative87 (29.3)47 (24.4)40 (38.5)
 Equivocal or unknown18 (6.1)9 (4.7)9 (8.7)
Evidence of PD-L1 testing D
 Yes463 (71.7)318 (73.8)145 (67.4)
CPS EN = 352N = 244N = 108
 <136 (10.2)18 (7.4)18 (16.7)
 ≥1295 (83.8)211 (86.5)84 (77.8)
 ≥20149 (42.3)109 (44.7)40 (37.0)
 Unknown/not documented21 (6.0)15 (6.1)6 (5.7)

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals receiving 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.

1L, first-line; CI, confidence interval; CPS, combined positive score; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HPV, human papillomavirus; IQR, interquartile range; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1.

All values are given as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

A Smoking status was not documented for 1 individual receiving 1L pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU.

B Includes pharynx not otherwise specified, tongue not otherwise specified, or other unspecified tumor site.

C Includes individuals not cured at first locoregional recurrence, or with second locoregional recurrence.

D PD-L1 testing performed at index date ± 30 days.

E If multiple CPS values were available, the score recorded closest to the index date was reported.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. We used the terminology CPS (referent: <1%) in column one and the correct terminology is CPS (referent: <1). The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.

Table 2

VariableOR95% CIp-value
Age (referent: <65 years)
 ≥65 years2.421.68–3.52<0.001
Sex (referent: male)
 Female1.410.90–2.220.140
ECOG PS on index date (referent: 0–1)
 2–42.031.26–3.340.004
 Unknown/not defined2.301.29–4.230.006
History of smoking (referent: no/unknown)
 Yes1.430.89–2.260.132
Primary tumor site (referent: oropharynx)
 Hypopharynx1.460.61–3.650.403
 Larynx1.841.09–3.120.023
 Oral cavity0.910.52–1.590.740
 Other A0.990.24–4.430.998
HPV status (referent: positive)
 Negative0.590.36–0.930.026
 Unknown0.580.32–1.030.065
CPS (referent: <1)
 1–192.621.12–6.120.026
 ≥203.211.37–7.550.007
 Unknown1.870.85–4.090.117
Census region (referent: Northeast)
 Midwest1.310.59–2.890.495
 South0.880.46–1.640.704
 West0.400.18–0.890.027
 Missing/not defined1.160.50–2.690.720
Advanced diagnostic criteria (referent: HPV-positive Stage IV oropharyngeal tumor at initial diagnosis)
 HNSCC not cured at initial diagnosis4.582.49–8.61<0.001
 Distant metastatic disease (HNSCC with distant recurrence OR Stage IVc at initial diagnosis)4.832.90–8.17<0.001
 HNSCC with locoregional recurrence4.622.61–8.35<0.001

Factors associated with use of 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy: stepwise logistic regression model.

1L, first-line; CI, confidence interval; CPS, combined positive score; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HPV, human papilloma virus; OR, odds ratio. Statistically significant p-values (<0.05) are presented in bold.

A Includes pharynx not otherwise specified, tongue not otherwise specified, or other unspecified tumor site.

Text Correction

In the published article, there was an error to the text in Results, Study population, where "CPS<1" was referred to as "CPS<1%".

This sentence previously stated: “A CPS of <1% was recorded for 10.2% of this latter group, while 83.8% had a score of ≥1 and 42.3% had a score of ≥20.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“A CPS of <1 was recorded for 10.2% of this latter group, while 83.8% had a score of ≥1 and 42.3% had a score of ≥20.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that these does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, antineoplastic agents, immunological, antibodies, Kaplan-Meier estimate, patient outcomes, real-world observational study, treatment patterns

Citation

Black CM, Hanna GJ, Wang L, Ramakrishnan K, Goto D, Turzhitsky V and Hair GM (2023) Corrigendum: Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among individuals receiving first-line pembrolizumab therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 13:1240947. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1240947

Received

17 June 2023

Accepted

30 June 2023

Published

17 July 2023

Volume

13 - 2023

Edited and reviewed by

Fernanda Visioli, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Christopher M. Black,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics