Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 17 November 2025

Sec. Surgical Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1621760

Case Report: Metastatic benign fibrous histiocytoma: a case series and review of diagnostic and therapeutic challenge

Xuesi Liu,&#x;Xuesi Liu1,2†Zhengwang Sun,&#x;Zhengwang Sun1,2†Huajian Wu&#x;Huajian Wu3†Qingrong Ye,&#x;Qingrong Ye1,2†Chunmeng Wang,*Chunmeng Wang1,2*Yangbai Sun,*Yangbai Sun1,2*Wangjun Yan,*Wangjun Yan1,2*
  • 1Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Department of Oncology, Shanghai, China
  • 3Department of Orthopedic, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Xiamen Hospital, Xiamen, China

Background: Benign Fibrous Histiocytoma (BFH), also known as dermatofibroma, is a common benign mesenchymal tumor of the skin. Although typically non-aggressive, rare cases of metastatic BFH pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Methods: This study reviews 10 cases of metastatic BFH diagnosed at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 2009 and 2024, with a detailed examination of three cases involving recurrent and metastatic behavior. Immunohistochemical markers and radiological imaging findings were analyzed to characterize tumor progression and treatment responses.

Results: The cases highlighted distinct patterns of recurrence and metastasis, including lymphatic and distant organ involvement. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated variable expression of markers such as Vimentin, CD68, CD163, Ki67, and SMA.

Conclusions: Metastatic BFH remains a rare but clinically significant condition. Early recognition, accurate histopathological diagnosis, and multimodal therapies are crucial for effective management.

Introduction

Benign Fibrous Histiocytoma (BFH), also known as dermatofibroma, is a common mesenchymal tumor of the skin. BFH is a benign tumor arising from fibroblasts and histiocytes affecting the dermis and subcutaneous soft tissues (1). It typically presents as an isolated cutaneous nodule that is firm or cystic, skin-colored or brown, later developing into a polypoid nodule or raised plaque (2). BFH primarily affects adults and is frequently found on the extremities (35). There are multiple pathological subtypes of BFH, including the classic dermal FH, as well as cellular, aneurysmal, and atypical variants. Metastasis of BFH is extremely rare, with only a few reports documented in the literature (2, 59). This paper summarizes 10 cases of metastatic BFH diagnosed at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 2009 to 2024, with detailed reports on three cases. In this article, we use BFH as an umbrella term that includes the conventional cutaneous form and a range of histologic variants. These variants comprise cellular, aneurysmal, and atypical forms, as well as less common lipidized, palisaded, and myxoid patterns. By low-grade malignant fibrohistiocytic tumors, we refer specifically to atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) under contemporary criteria, which is classified as BFH in this study.

Case presentation

Among the ten cases reviewed, three were classified as cellular variants, and one as a hemangioma variant. The primary tumor sites included two cases in the head and neck, four in the limbs, one in the chest wall, one in the shoulder, one in the testis, and one with an unknown origin. Metastatic patterns included five cases with pulmonary metastases, five with lymph node metastases, two with subcutaneous metastases, and one with pleural metastasis (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Clinical information of ten patients with benign fibrous histiocytoma metastasis.

Case 1

A 27-year-old male discovered a 0.5 cm subcutaneous nodule on his left upper arm in May 2021 (Supplementary Figure S1). The nodule gradually enlarged to form a 2 cm red mass protruding from the skin. In August 2021, he underwent “left shoulder mass excision,” and postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of benign fibrous histiocytoma. Immunohistochemistry showed positive results for Vimentin, CD68, CD163, S100 (partial), P16 (partial), CD34, INI1, and Ki67 (5%) with negative results for SSTR2, SOX10, STAT6, EMA, CK8/18, CK19, E-cad, ALK-1A4, and ALK (D5F3).

In February 2022, a left axillary nodule was detected, and he underwent “left axillary lymph node dissection,” with pathology confirming metastasis to two left axillary lymph nodes. In April 2022, a second surgery for “extended excision of the left upper arm tumor bed” showed a cellular fibrous histiocytoma with clean resection margins. Immunohistochemistry revealed positive Vimentin, b-catenin, Bcl-2, SMA (slightly), CD163 (partial), CD68 (slightly), and Ki67 (10%) and negative results for Desmin, CD34, S100, STAT6, CK, and TLE1.

In January 2023, the tumor recurred (Figure 1A). In February 2023, further excision of the left upper arm and axillary tumor was performed, confirming lymph node metastases. Immunohistochemistry showed positive Vimentin, CD68, CD163, S100 (scattered), and Ki67 (5-30%) and negative CD34, SMA, CD117, DOG1, and STAT6.

Figure 1
Panels A and B show PET scans with highlighted areas. Panel C displays a side view of a patient's torso with surgical markings. Panel D shows a front view of the patient's torso with surgical markings. Panel E depicts an open surgical site with tools. Panel F displays excised tissue next to a ruler on a surgical drape.

Figure 1. (A) The patient’s PET-CT results indicated lymph node metastasis in the left axilla in January 2023. (B) The patient’s PET-CT results revealed left axillary lymph node metastases in April 2023. (C) Preoperative photograph of the recurrent tumor mass in the patient’s left upper arm awaiting excision. (D) Preoperative photograph of the metastatic lymph nodes in the patient’s left axilla awaiting dissection. (E) Intraoperative photos of the patient. (F) Photos of the removed mass.

In April 2023, MRI and PET-CT scans revealed left axillary lymph node metastases (Figure 1B). The patient underwent five cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide, ending in July 2023. Despite treatment, recurrence occurred in June 2023, requiring further excision in August 2023 (Figures 1C–F). MRI in May 2024 suggested possible local recurrence. The patient remains under regular follow-up and disease monitoring.

Case 2

A 28-year-old female initially presented in 2012 with a mass in the right occipital region, which was surgically excised (Supplementary Figure S2). Pathology indicated a low-grade malignant fibrohistiocytic tumor. Additional surgeries were performed in 2014 and 2016, followed by left cervical metastasis surgery in 2017 and right cervical and submental metastasis surgeries in 2020. Pathology described the tumors as locally invasive or low-grade malignant fibrohistiocytic tumors. Immunohistochemistry results included positive results for H3K27ME3 and CD10, with negative results for S100, Desmin, CD34, and SMA.

In November 2020, a firm 2 × 2 cm mass was noted in the submandibular region. PET-CT in January 2021 showed multiple subcutaneous nodules, predominantly in the neck and chest, with increased FDG metabolism, suggesting tumor infiltration (Figure 2A). The patient had weakened leg strength and difficulty walking. Surgery in January 2021 excised neck, supraclavicular, and submandibular tumors, confirmed as cellular fibrohistiocytic tumors. Immunohistochemistry results included negative SMA, CD34, Desmin, Calponin, Caldesmon, and positive Ki67 (30%).

Figure 2
Medical imaging showing various scans from PET/CT studies. Panel A displays a sequence in axial, coronal, and sagittal views illustrating a specific region with highlighted areas. Panel B shows similar scans, including whole-body imaging with marked black spots indicating areas of interest, possibly representing abnormal metabolic activity. Both panels include crosshair markers and scale bars, with color-coded regions signifying intensity levels.

Figure 2. (A) The patient’s PET-CT results indicated multiple subcutaneous metastases in January 2021. (B) The patient’s PET-CT results revealed multiple subcutaneous and lung metastases in November 2024.

In April 2021, radiotherapy was applied to the left clavicular region. Targeted therapy with anlotinib began in April 2024. By November 2024, recurrent and metastatic lesions were detected in multiple areas, including the neck, back, chest wall, and thighs. PET-CT revealed diffuse pulmonary nodules with mild FDG uptake, suggesting metastases (Figure 2B). A combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors was recommended, along with ongoing follow-up.

Case 3

In 2020, a 19-year-old male developed a tumor in his right foot, which was surgically excised (Supplementary Figure S3). Recurrence in July 2022 led to a second surgery. In September 2023, a third recurrence required extensive excision, skin grafting, and reconstruction. Pathology suggested a low-grade malignant histiocytic tumor with clear margins. Immunohistochemistry showed positive results for CD1α (slightly), P16 (partial), CD34 (vascular), CD163, PGM1, and Ki67 (20% positive) with negative results for SMA, Desmin, MyoD1, ALK, S100, Clusterin, CD23, AE1/AE3, CD117, F8, and BRAF.

By August 2024, the patient experienced leg swelling and a palpable right groin mass. Biopsy confirmed a metastatic low-grade malignant histiocytic tumor. Immunohistochemistry results included positive OCT2 (partial), CD163, and Ki67 (20%) with negative S100, Desmin, CD1α, Langerin, MPO, CD4, and CD45. MRI revealed a right groin mass (Figures 3A–C). PET-CT showed multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the right popliteal fossa, inguinal region, and iliac fossa, with the largest measuring 126 × 94 mm (Figure 3D). Additionally, two nodular lesions were observed under the skin of the left pelvic wall (Figure 3E).

Figure 3
MRI and PET scans are displayed, showcasing a large tumor on a patient's knee and pelvis in images A, B, and C. Images D and E show additional cross-sectional scans. Photos F and G depict a leg and foot, demonstrating postoperative outcomes, with visible scars and healed skin.

Figure 3. (A-C) MRI revealed a right groin mass in August 2024. (D) The patient’s PET-CT results indicated lymph nodes metastasis in the right popliteal fossa in September 2024. (E) The patient’s PET-CT results revealed subcutaneous metastasis in left pelvic wall in September 2024. (F, G) Photograph of the right foot mass at the time of the patient’s visit in November 2024.

Chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide, combined with anlotinib, was administered for two cycles. In November 2024, the patient presented with a recurrent tumor in the right foot and commenced treatment with a combination of temozolomide and anlotinib (Figures 3F–G). Following treatment initiation, the patient reported experiencing nausea and vomiting. Treatment continued while awaiting genetic testing results.

Discussion

BFH is primarily composed of fibroblasts and histiocytes, exhibiting benign yet diverse histological features (2, 6). Common variants include cellular, aneurysmal, and atypical forms, along with less frequent variants such as lipidized, palisaded, and myxoid types (6). These subtypes differ in pathology and prognosis. For example, cellular FH is characterized by larger cells, higher density, and less intercellular collagen, whereas atypical FH displays a mixture of pleomorphic spindle and polygonal cells with multinucleated giant cells, prominent nucleoli, and hemosiderin deposits (10, 11). Immunohistochemistry aids in the differentiation and diagnosis of BFH from other benign lesions, such as neurofibromas, leiomyomas, amelanotic melanomas, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). DFSP typically exhibits high CD34 expression, while BFH is often CD34-negative (2, 6, 1214). Smooth muscle actin (SMA) is a marker for smooth muscle tumors and is generally negative in BFH but positive in leiomyomas (15). Amelanotic melanomas often show diffuse S-100 positivity, whereas BFH is S100 negative (2). In our cases, immunohistochemical analyses of both primary and metastatic lesions were performed to confirm tumor type and metastasis. Diagnostic markers used included Vimentin, S100, SMA, CD34, CD68, CD163, Desmin, AE1/AE3, and Ki67. AE1/AE3 serves as an epithelial tumor marker, Vimentin identifies fibroblasts, CD68 highlights monocytes, histiocytes, osteoclasts, mast cells, and giant cells, and Desmin is specific for skeletal muscle tumors. Beyond morphology and immunophenotype, recent studies point to several molecular clues related to metastasis. In general, metastasizing BFH carries a higher burden of copy-number alterations, most often gains of chromosome 7 and 8q and loss of Xq (10). PKC-related gene fusions such as CD63::PRKCD have also been documented, particularly in aneurysmal lesions, and metastasizing specimens may display recurrent gains of chromosomes 1, 3, 8, and 11 (16).

BFH predominantly occurs in the extremities of middle-aged adults, although it can develop in any anatomical site and at any age. Different subtypes share similar predilection sites and age ranges (2, 11, 17). Recurrence risks vary by subtype. Conventional FH and most variants rarely recur even with incomplete excision (1-2%). However, cellular, aneurysmal, and atypical BFH have recurrence rates as high as 20% (10, 11, 17, 18). Metastasis of BFH is exceedingly rare, and most cases reported involve the lungs and lymph nodes. Although histological features associated with recurrence and metastasis include larger size, aneurysmal changes, high cellularity, pleomorphism, high mitotic rates, and necrosis (6), subsequent studies suggest that morphology alone cannot reliably predict aggressive behavior (5, 10). Studies indicate that recurrent or large-cell variants of FH are more prone to metastasis (5). Among the three patients detailed in this study, all exhibited BFH metastasis and multiple recurrences. One case involved a rare occipital primary BFH with submental and pulmonary metastases, later progressing to widespread soft tissue metastases. The other two cases demonstrated lymph node metastases, with one patient also exhibiting subcutaneous metastasis. These patterns of metastasis are clinically uncommon.

Surgical excision remains the primary treatment for BFH. Most patients achieve a cure through surgery. However, when tumor location or disease burden makes resection infeasible or unacceptably morbid, radiotherapy or systemic therapy should be considered in consultation with a multidisciplinary team. In the absence of formal guidelines for radiotherapy or chemotherapy in BFH, management is typically extrapolated from other soft-tissue tumors. To date, these modalities have not shown clear efficacy. A case report described a patient with aneurysmal-type FH and metastasis who could not undergo surgery due to tumor vascularity and disease severity (19). This patient received palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy without success, ultimately succumbing to the disease. Another patient with pulmonary metastases received chemotherapy, starting with ifosfamide and then single-agent doxorubicin (20). The disease progressed despite both treatments. One case series reported five patients who received chemotherapy and five who received radiotherapy (5). Chemotherapy regimens included doxorubicin–ifosfamide, sorafenib, and gemcitabine. Four of the five patients experienced disease progression. Among those treated with radiotherapy, one patient died. Thus, disease-specific radiotherapy protocols and effective systemic therapies for BFH remain undefined, highlighting the need for therapeutic development and prospective evaluation.

Compared with prior publications—most of which are single-case reports or very small series (2, 4, 6, 8, 21)—our study offers several advantages. First, we report a single-center cohort of 10 patients collected over 15 years with uniform pathology review, enhancing internal comparability. Second, all cases are previously unreported. Third, we expand the clinicopathologic spectrum by documenting uncommon presentations and atypical metastatic patterns, notably multifocal subcutaneous deposits. Fourth, we integrate radiologic and pathologic assessment and apply a pragmatic immunohistochemical framework to both primary and metastatic lesions, helping to reduce misclassification between BFH and other soft-tissue tumors. Fifth, we report real-world experience with multimodal combined therapy, including various permutations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Using patient-level timelines, we delineate recurrence windows and initial metastatic sites. These observations inform treatment strategies for patients with metastatic BFH. Such integrated information is rarely consolidated in prior reports. Finally, we propose core data elements for standardized reporting to facilitate cross-study comparisons and future registry-based aggregation. Taken together, these features make our series a more informative, practice-oriented reference than the existing literature on metastatic BFH.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

This study is a retrospective case series involving anonymized clinical data from patients who provided written informed consent for the publication of their information and images. The study did not involve any prospective data collection, intervention, or experimentation. According to the policy of our institutional review board, ethical approval is not required for retrospective analyses of de-identified case reports. Therefore, a formal waiver of ethical approval was not necessary. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

XL: Writing – original draft. ZS: Writing – review & editing. HW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. QY: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. CW: Resources, Writing – review & editing. YS: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. WY: Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 8257114622).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1621760/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Chen TC, Kuo T, and Chan HL. Dermatofibroma is a clonal proliferative disease. J Cutaneous Pathol. (2000) 27:36–9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2000.027001036.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fuentes-Sánchez J, Pena-Burgos EM, Tapia-Viñe M, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, and Pozo-Kreilinger JJ. Recurrent and metastatic cellular cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma: A case report and literature review. J Cutaneous Pathol. (2024) 51:214–20. doi: 10.1111/cup.14574

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gonzalez S and Duarte I. Benign fibrous histiocytoma of the skin. A morphologic study of 290 cases. Pathol Res Pract. (1982) 174:379–91. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(82)80019-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gleason BC and Fletcher CD. Deep “benign” fibrous histiocytoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 69 cases of a rare tumor indicating occasional metastatic potential. Am J Surg Pathol. (2008) 32:354–62. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31813c6b85

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Doyle LA and Fletcher CD. Metastasizing “benign” cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. (2013) 37:484–95. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827070d4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A and Ptaszyński K. Benign fibrous histiocytoma of the skin metastasizing to the inguinal lymph node. Polish J Pathol: Off J Polish Soc Pathol. (2011) 62:183–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Lodewick E, Avermaete A, Blom WA, Lelie B, Block R, Keuppens M, et al. Fatal case of metastatic cellular fibrous histiocytoma: case report and review of literature. Am J Dermatopathol. (2014) 36:e156–62. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e318299f28c

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Colome-Grimmer MI and Evans HL. Metastasizing cellular dermatofibroma. A Rep Two Cases Am J Surg Pathol. (1996) 20:1361–7. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199611000-00007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mentzel T, Wiesner T, Cerroni L, Hantschke M, Kutzner H, Rütten A, et al. Malignant dermatofibroma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of seven cases. Modern Pathol: An Off J United States Can Acad Pathol Inc. (2013) 26:256–67. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Charli-Joseph Y, Saggini A, Doyle LA, Fletcher CD, Weier J, Mirza S, et al. DNA copy number changes in tumors within the spectrum of cellular, atypical, and metastasizing fibrous histiocytoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2014) 71:256–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kaddu S, Mcmenamin ME, and Fletcher CD. Atypical fibrous histiocytoma of the skin: clinicopathologic analysis of 59 cases with evidence of infrequent metastasis. Am J Surg Pathol. (2002) 26:35–46. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200201000-00004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tsunoda K, Oikawa H, Maeda F, Takahashi K, and Akasaka T. A case of cellular fibrous histiocytoma on the right elbow with repeated relapse within a short period. Case Rep Dermatol. (2015) 7:10–6. doi: 10.1159/000371790

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Abenoza P and Lillemoe T. CD34 and factor XIIIa in the differential diagnosis of dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Dermatopathol. (1993) 15:429–34. doi: 10.1097/00000372-199310000-00003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Altman DA, Nickoloff BJ, and Fivenson DP. Differential expression of factor XIIIa and CD34 in cutaneous mesenchymal tumors. J Cutaneous Pathol. (1993) 20:154–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1993.tb00233.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Alves JV, Matos DM, Barreiros HF, and Bártolo EA. Variants of dermatofibroma–a histopathological study. Anais Brasileiros Dermatol. (2014) 89:472–7. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142629

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Takeda N, Makise N, Lin J, Kageyama H, Oikawa M, Sugiyama T, et al. Metastasizing aneurysmal dermatofibroma initially diagnosed as angiosarcoma confirmed by CD63::PRKCD fusion gene detection with nanopore sequencing. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. (2024) 63:e23246. doi: 10.1002/gcc.23246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Calonje E and Fletcher CD. Aneurysmal benign fibrous histiocytoma: clinicopathological analysis of 40 cases of a tumour frequently misdiagnosed as a vascular neoplasm. Histopathology. (1995) 26:323–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1995.tb00193.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Calonje E, Mentzel T, and Fletcher CD. Cellular benign fibrous histiocytoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 74 cases of a distinctive variant of cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma with frequent recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol. (1994) 18:668–76. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199407000-00002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chamberlin M, Khan S, Hernandez C, Miettinen M, Wei JS, Khan J, et al. Aneurysmal fibrous histiocytoma: A large soft tissue tumor with metastases treated with palliative radiation therapy and targeted therapy. Case Rep Oncol. (2021) 14:17–23. doi: 10.1159/000511073

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. De Hertogh G, Bergmans G, Molderez C, et al. Cutaneous cellular fibrous histiocytoma metastasizing to the lungs. Histopathology. (2002) 41:85–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.t01-1-01368.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wood KA, Easson AM, Ghazarian D, and Kamil S. Metastatic aneurysmal fibrous histiocytoma in a 20-year-old woman: A rare case report with review of the literature and discussion of its genomic features. J Cutaneous Pathol. (2020) 47:870–5. doi: 10.1111/cup.13738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: benign fibrous histiocytoma, metastasis, recurrence, case report, treatment

Citation: Liu X, Sun Z, Wu H, Ye Q, Wang C, Sun Y and Yan W (2025) Case Report: Metastatic benign fibrous histiocytoma: a case series and review of diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Front. Oncol. 15:1621760. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1621760

Received: 01 May 2025; Accepted: 24 October 2025;
Published: 17 November 2025.

Edited by:

Francesco Giovinazzo, Saint Camillo Hospital, Italy

Reviewed by:

Alessandro De Vita, Scientific Institute of Romagna for the Study and Treatment of Tumors (IRCCS), Italy
Sushila Dahiya, AIIMS, India

Copyright © 2025 Liu, Sun, Wu, Ye, Wang, Sun and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Wangjun Yan, eWFud2pAZnVkYW4uZWR1LmNu; Yangbai Sun, ZHJzdW55YkBmdWRhbi5lZHUuY24=; Chunmeng Wang, Y213YW5nMTk3NUAxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.