CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 26 February 2026

Sec. Hematologic Malignancies

Volume 16 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1656404

Case Report: KMT2A amplification in two adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

  • MG

    Min Gao 1

  • YC

    Yunjia Chen 1

  • KB

    Kimo Bachiashvili 2

  • PJ

    Pankit J. Vachhani 2

  • OJ

    Omer Jamy 2

  • SH

    Shuko Harada 3

  • AC

    Alexander Craig Mackinnon 3

  • NS

    Nirupama Singh 3

  • AR

    Aishwarya Ravindran 3

  • BV

    Baleed Vishnu Reddy 3

  • AJ

    Andrew J. Carroll 1

  • FM

    Fady M. Mikhail 1*

  • 1. Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States

  • 2. Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States

  • 3. Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States

Article metrics

View details

284

Views

18

Downloads

Abstract

The KMT2A gene, located at chromosome band 11q23, encodes a lysine methyltransferase essential for hematopoietic gene regulation. While KMT2A rearrangements are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), KMT2A amplification is rare, occurring in ~1% of AML cases and even less frequently in B-ALL. Given its rarity, understanding KMT2A amplification in B-ALL is crucial for improving diagnostics and therapy. We report two adult B-ALL cases with KMT2A amplification. Patient 1, a 58-year-old male, had KMT2A amplification (6~18 copies in 68.5% of bone marrow cells), a complex karyotype, and a pathogenic TP53 variant (c.524G>A, p.Arg175His). He underwent induction chemotherapy but passed away after two months due to complications. Patient 2, a 66-year-old female, had KMT2A amplification (8~11 copies in 87.5% of peripheral blood cells) and CRLF2 rearrangement, representing the first reported case of de novo Ph-like B-ALL with KMT2A amplification in an adult. She deteriorated rapidly and died within four days. In addition to these two cases from our cohort, we review nine published cases with KMT2A amplification in B-ALL, which showed frequent TP53 alterations, emphasizing the clinical and genetic characteristics of this aggressive leukemia subtype. These cases highlight the high-risk nature of KMT2A-amplified B-ALL, particularly in older adults, where prognosis is poor and linked to TP53 variants or CRLF2 rearrangement. Our review underscores the need for genetic profiling to improve risk stratification and treatment. Given the limited documented cases, further research is essential to develop better therapeutic strategies for KMT2A-amplified B-ALL.

Introduction

KMT2A (lysine methyltransferase 2A), formerly known as MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia), is a gene on chromosome band 11q23, which encodes a histone methyltransferase that methylates H3K4, activating key developmental genes and regulating self-renewal and differentiation in hematopoietic stem cells (1). KMT2A rearrangements are frequently observed in both myeloid and lymphoid leukemias, particularly in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) (2, 3). Unlike KMT2A rearrangements, which involve the fusion of KMT2A with various partner genes, KMT2A amplification arises through mechanisms such as extrachromosomal double minutes or intrachromosomal tandem duplications, often presenting as homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) (4). KMT2A amplification is a rare genetic abnormality, occurring in approximately 1% of AML cases (57) and even less frequently in B-ALL, with only a few reported cases in the literature (8, 9).

Despite its rarity in B-ALL, KMT2A amplification has been associated with distinct clinical and genetic features. One notable aspect is its frequent association with TP53 pathogenic variants, including single nucleotide variants or structural variants, further contributing to the aggressive nature of the disease (9). TP53 is a crucial tumor suppressor that regulates genomic stability and apoptosis. TP53 pathogenic variants impair its function, leading to uncontrolled proliferation, therapy resistance, and poor clinical outcomes (10, 11). KMT2A-amplified B-ALL cases with TP53 pathogenic variants are particularly challenging to treat, demonstrating limited responses to standard therapies and a high risk of relapse (9). Given this association, understanding the interplay between KMT2A amplification and TP53 variants is crucial for risk stratification and development of targeted therapies to improve patient outcomes.

CRLF2 rearrangements, a hallmark of Ph-like B-ALL, contribute to cytokine receptor-mediated leukemogenesis by activating the JAK-STAT pathway, leading to enhanced proliferation and poor prognosis (12, 13). About 55–68% of CRLF2-rearranged cases also have JAK-pathway mutations (most often JAK2) (14). CRLF2 rearrangements have not been documented in KMT2A-amplified B-ALL. Recent adult cohort data from a resource-limited setting confirmed that Ph-like B-ALL is common and enriched for adverse features such as MRD positivity and IKZF1 deletions, underscoring its aggressive clinical behavior (15). Since both CRLF2 rearrangements and KMT2A amplification define high-risk B-ALL subtypes and are associated with treatment resistance and poor clinical outcomes, it remains unclear whether they coexist or represent distinct oncogenic mechanisms. If both alterations co-occur, epigenetic dysregulation and JAK-STAT hyperactivation may drive an ultra-high-risk leukemia, requiring combined JAK inhibitors and epigenetic modulators. Further research is needed to assess their coexistence, interactions, and treatment strategies.

Given the rarity of KMT2A amplification in B-ALL, systematic documentation and analysis of cases are essential to improve our understanding of its pathogenesis and refine the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In this study, we report two adult B-ALL patients with complex karyotypic abnormalities and KMT2A amplification, including one patient with a TP53 pathogenic variant (p.Arg175His) and another with a CRLF2 rearrangement, marking the first documented case of KMT2A amplification coexisting with Ph-like B-ALL in an adult. Additionally, we review our cases along with nine recently reported cases, providing further insight into the clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular characteristics of KMT2A-amplified B-ALL, and addressing associated management challenges.

Materials and methods

Flow cytometry analysis

Bone marrow specimens from our patients underwent flow cytometry analysis at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Pathology Lab. The analysis was conducted following standard flow cytometry protocols to ensure accuracy and reproducibility. The cell markers analyzed by flow cytometry included T-cell markers (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8), B-cell markers (CD9, CD10, CD19, CD20, CD22, Kappa, Lambda), myeloid and progenitor markers (CD13, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD33, CD34, CD38, CD58, CD64, CD117), and the pan-leukocyte marker CD45.

G-banded chromosome and FISH analyses

Bone marrow or peripheral blood specimens from our patients underwent comprehensive cytogenomic analyses, including G-banded chromosome and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses, at the UAB Cytogenetics Lab. G-banded chromosome analysis was performed using standard cytogenetic protocols. Interphase and/or metaphase FISH analyses were conducted following the manufacturer’s protocols, as previously described (16). The B-ALL FISH panel (Abbott) included BCR/ABL1 dual-fusion probes, KMT2A break-apart probes, ETV6/RUNX1 dual-fusion probes, and centromeric probes for chromosome 4, 10, and 17. The Ph-like B-ALL FISH panel (OGT Cytocell) included break-apart probes for ABL2 (1q25.2), PDGFRB (5q32), JAK2 (9p24.1), ABL1 (9q34.1), and CRLF2 (Xp22.33/Yp11.32). The TP53 probe mixture (Abbott) includes a TP53 (17p13.1) probe and a chromosome 17 centromere probe. Findings were reported in accordance with the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (ISCN) 2020.

Targeted next-generation sequencing panel analysis

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel analysis was conducted on bone marrow biopsy samples at the UAB Pathology Lab to detect gene fusions and somatic variants using an RNA-based myeloid fusion panel and a myeloid mutation panel, following established protocols (17, 18). The RNA-based myeloid fusion panel targeted key fusion driver genes, including ABL1, ABL2, BCL2, BRAF, CCND1, CREBBP, EGFR, ETV6, FGFR1, FGFR2, FUS, HMGA2, JAK2, KAT6A (MOZ), KAT6B, KMT2A, KMT2A-PTDs, MECOM, MET, MLLT10, MRTFA (MKL1), MYBL1, MYH11, NTRK2, NTRK3, NUP214, NUP98, PAX5, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, RARA, RUNX1, TCF3, TFE3, and ZNF384. The myeloid mutation panel assessed hotspot variants in genes such as ABL1, ANKRD26, BRAF, CBL, CSF3R, DDX41, DNMT3A, FLT3, GATA2, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, WT1, MPL, MYD88, NPM1, NRAS, PPM1D, PTPN11, SETBP1, SF3B1, SMC1A, SMC3, SRSF2, and U2AF1, along with full-gene sequencing of ASXL1, BCOR, CALR, CEBPA, ETV6, EZH2, IKZF1, NF1, PHF6, PRPF8, RB1, RUNX1, SH2B3, STAG2, TET2, TP53, and ZRSR2.

Data visualization and statistical analysis

Data visualization and statistical analysis were performed in R (v.4.3.1). A violin plot was generated using the ggviolin function in the ggpubr (v.0.6.0) package in R, while pie charts were created using the pie3D function in the plotrix (v.3.8-6) package. These visualizations illustrate the age distribution, clinical outcomes, and sex distribution of 11 B-ALL patients with KMT2A amplification, with the violin plot representing age distribution and the pie chart depicting clinical outcomes and sex proportions. Tables summarizing patient characteristics and analytical results were generated using the GT (v.0.10.1) package, ensuring clear and structured data presentation. A Student’s t-test was applied for comparisons between deceased and remission groups, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Case presentations

Patient 1

A 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and anxiety/depression was transferred from an outside hospital for suspected newly diagnosed acute leukemia. He was admitted to UAB for comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. The patient’s clinical course and diagnostic workup are shown in Figure 1A. Flow cytometry of the bone marrow aspirate identified 54.11% leukemic blasts, positive for CD13dim, CD19, CD22dim, CD34, CD38, CD45, CD58, and nTdT, and negative for NK/T, other myeloid, and monocytic markers, confirming a B-ALL diagnosis (Supplementary Table S1). Bone marrow morphology assessment revealed a hypercellular marrow (approximately 90% cellularity) with markedly reduced trilineage hematopoiesis. Most blasts on touch imprint exhibited cytoplasmic vacuolization. These findings are consistent with B-ALL.

Figure 1

Interphase FISH analysis of uncultured bone marrow cells, using the B-ALL FISH panel, identified 6~18 copies of KMT2A in 68.5% of cells (Figures 1B, C), along with copy number alterations affecting several genes, including ABL1 (3~5 copies in 68% of cells), ETV6 (2~5 copies in 67.5% of cells), RUNX1 (3~4 copies in 9.5% of cells), and chromosomes 4, 10, and 17 (3~5 copies each) (Supplementary Table S1). G-banded chromosome analysis of unstimulated bone marrow cells revealed the presence of a stemline clone with complex karyotype involving chromosomes 3, 5, 10, 11, 14, 16, 18, and 20, in addition to the presence of 1~3 marker chromosomes, and a subclone that represents the inexact doubling product of the stemline clone: 41~44,XY,-3,-5,-10,add(11)(q23),add(14)(p11.2),-16,add(18)(q23),-20,+1~3mar[cp4]/70~80<3n>,XXY,+2,-3,-5,+6,-10,+11,add(11)(q23)x2,+13,+13,add(14)(p11.2),+15,-16,add(16)(q24),add(18)(q23),+21,+22,+2~5mar[cp10] (Figure 1D).

A targeted myeloid NGS panel identified a clinically significant TP53 missense variant (c.524G>A, p.Arg175His) with a 91% variant allele frequency (VAF) (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting a potential role in leukemogenesis and treatment resistance. Additionally, no fusion transcripts were detected using a targeted RNA-based myeloid fusion NGS panel.

The patient was started on induction chemotherapy (Figure 1A), which was complicated by febrile neutropenia, necessitating the removal of his mediport as a potential infection source. During hospitalization, he developed progressive hypoxia, pleural effusions, and encephalopathy, requiring multiple Medical Emergency Team (MET) activations, including one for unresponsiveness, which improved with Narcan. Bronchoscopy showed minimal secretions and arytenoid inflammation, suggesting aspiration. His condition worsened, requiring MET activation for altered mental status and hypotension. He developed severe lactic acidosis (lactate level of 11 mmol/L), tested positive for COVID19, and had persistent pseudomonas and klebsiella bacteremia. Despite maximum vasopressor support, he remained profoundly hypotensive. He ultimately succumbed to refractory septic shock and multiorgan failure after a two-month hospitalization.

Patient 2

A 66-year-old female with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, GERD, HTN, obstructive sleep apnea, and HLD presented to an outside hospital with dizziness, ear drainage, gait difficulty, shortness of breath, and cough. Patient’s workup revealed leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, raising suspicion for acute leukemia. She was transferred to UAB for further evaluation. The patient’s diagnostic timeline and treatment course are illustrated in Figure 2A. Flow cytometry of the peripheral blood demonstrated 89.71% leukemic blasts that were positive for CD10, CD13, CD19, CD22dim, CD34, CD38, CD58, nTdT, and negative for NK/T, other myeloid, and monocytic cell markers, supporting a diagnosis of B-ALL (Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 2

Interphase FISH analysis using the B-ALL FISH panel identified KMT2A amplification, with 8~11 copies detected in 87.5% of peripheral blood cells (Figure 2B). Additionally, the Ph-like B-ALL FISH panel analysis detected a CRLF2 gene rearrangement in 85% of bone marrow cells (Figure 2C), with the classic fusion signal disruption suggestive of the t(X;14)(p22.3;q32.3) and resulting in IGH::CRLF2 fusion. This is an alteration commonly associated with high-risk leukemia and poor treatment response. Further FISH analysis of the TP53 gene in bone marrow cells showed no deletions or structural rearrangements (Supplementary Table S1). G-banded chromosome analysis of peripheral blood cells was unsuccessful, but limited analysis indicated additional material attached to chromosome 11 at band 11q23 (Figure 2D), a region frequently involved in KMT2A-related leukemias.

During hospitalization, the patient developed pulmonary edema and decompensated cirrhosis, accompanied by altered mental status and respiratory distress, requiring MET activation, Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure support, and eventual intubation. Despite treatment with Lasix, Solumedrol, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and blood transfusions, her condition worsened due to septic shock, acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and cirrhosis with varices. Given her multiorgan failure and poor prognosis, goals of care discussions led to a comfort care transition. She was later found unresponsive with no pulse, and electrocardiogram confirmed no cardiac rhythm. She passed away four days after hospitalization (Figure 2A). Due to her rapid clinical deterioration and subsequent death, targeted NGS could not be performed.

Cases review

This report reviews two cases from our cohort and nine published cases of KMT2A-amplified B-ALL (Table 1), summarizing distributions by age (9/11, 82% >55 years; 2/11, 18% <16 years), outcome (7/11, 64% deceased; 2/11, 18% in remission; 2/11, 18% not available), and sex (6/11, 55% male; 5/11, 45% female). Both pediatric patients (6, 19) (18%) achieved remission, whereas the majority of adult patients (64%) experienced fatal outcomes, suggesting a strong age-associated difference in clinical course. Patients in the remission group clustered at markedly younger ages than those in the deceased group, and fatal cases were predominantly observed among older adults (Figures 3A, B). Among the eleven cases analyzed, one case (9%) was classified as Ph-like B-ALL, two cases (18%) as pre-B ALL (9, 20), three cases (27%) as therapy-related B-ALL (21, 22), and one case (9%) exhibited transformation from B-ALL to T-ALL (23). CD10 expression varied, with three cases positive (27%) and seven negative (63%), indicating immunophenotypic diversity. KMT2A amplification (3 to >20 copies) was frequently associated with complex karyotypes, particularly involving chromosome band 11q23. TP53 alterations were found in five cases (45%), including missense variants or structural variants. Additional genetic changes included CRLF2 rearrangement (1/11, 9%), multiple copies of ABL1, BCR, ETV6, and RUNX1, as well as chromosomal deletions. These findings highlight the need for further research and novel therapies for this high-risk leukemia subtype.

Table 1

CaseReferenceSexAge (Yrs)DiagnosisCD10 (FC)KaryotypeKMT2A (FISH)TP53Other resultsOutcome
1Current case 1M59B-ALLNeg41~44,XY,-3,-5,-10,add(11)(q23),add(14)(p11.2),-16,add(18)(q23),-20,+1~3mar[cp4]/70~80<3n>,XXY,+2,-3,-5,+6,-10,+11,add(11)(q23)x2,+13,+13,add(14)(p11.2),+15,-16,add(16)(q24),add(18)(q23),+21,+22,+2~5mar[cp10]6~18c.524G>A, p.Arg175His, VAF 91%3–5 copies of ABL1, BCR, ETV6, RUNX1, chr 4, 10, 17.Deceased
2Current case 2F66Ph-like B-ALLPosChromosome analysis failed, but metaphases revealed unknown material on chromosome 11q238~11No deletion/duplicationPos for CRLF2-RDeceased
3PMID: 12604431F86pre-B ALLNeg44,XX,del(5)(q13q31),dic(6;17)(p25;q11),hsr(11)(pter_q23::hsr::q21::hsr::qter),-16,-17[18]/46,XX[2]MultipleChr 17 lossNADeceased
4PMID: 23238285_1M80Therapy-related B-ALLNeg42,XY,−3,hsr(11)(q23),−14,−16,−20[cp6]/43,idem,+mar[cp3]/46,XY[11]MultipleNANeg for BCR::ABL1, FLT3NA
5PMID: 38735761F70pre-B ALLNeg44-47,XX,del(5)(q22q35),-7,dic(12;18)?(?p12;p11.3),der(15)t(?7;15)(p11.2;p11.2),-20, del(22)(q13.1),+1~4mar[cp6]/44,idem,der(11),add(11)(p15)add(11)(q23)[cp6]/83–87<4n>,XXXX,-2,-3,-4,del(5)(q22q35)x2,-7,-9,-11,add(11)(q?23)x2,-13,-14,-15,-15,-19,-20,-21,+8~10mar[cp4]/46,XX[2]≥4Biallelic p.Val173Met, p.Val216Met, VAFs 37% and 40%, respectivelyNADeceased
6PMID: 36964033M69B-ALLNegNA>20Deletion3–4 copies of BCR, ABL1Deceased
7Proc UCLA Healthc 19 (2015)F67Therapy-related B-ALLPos45-46,XX,add(8)(q24.3),add(16)(q22),+21,del(21)(q22),-22,add(22)(q11.2),+mar[cp8]/46,XX[8]3~4NANeg for BCR::ABL1Deceased
8PMID: 35402256F65B-ALL to T-ALLNeg44,X,-X,add(1)(p13),add(2)(q21),-4,-5,-10,del(11)(q)?,-12,-14,-17,-18,+r1,+mar1, +mar2,+mar3,+mar4,+mar5 [3]/46,XX[4]8c.455dupC, p.Pro153Alafs*28, VAFs 49.5-94.1%Neg for BCR::ABL1Deceased
9PMID: 23238285_2M62Therapy-related B-ALLNeg44-45,XY,−5,hsr(11)(q23),−15,+mar1[cp3]/48–50,sl,+6,+8,+20,+22[cp2]/57−59,sdl1,+1,+del(1)(q12),+2,+7,+10,+hsr(11)(q23)a,+12,+13,+21,−mar1,+mar2(cp3)/59,sdl2,+X,−1,−del(1)(q12),+del(1)(q25),+5,+10,+11[cp6]/73–77,sdl2,+Y,+del(1)(q12),+3,+4,+5,+6,+8,+9,+10,+11,−hsr(11),+12,+13,+14,+15,+16,+17,+17,+18,+18,+19,+22,−mar2,+mar3x2[cp7]MultipleNANeg for FLT3NA
10PMID: 22052166M12B-ALLPos47,X,-Y,+1,del(1)(q25),del(1)(q12),dup(11)(q24q23),add(12)(p11.2),+213NANARemission
11PMID: 11069023
(case 7)
M7B-ALLNAFailed>2NAFailed for SBRemission

Clinical features of B-ALL patients with KMT2A amplification.

VAF, Variant Allele Frequency; B-ALL, B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; BCR::ABL1, BCR::ABL1 Fusion; Chr, Chromosome; CRLF2-R, CRLF2 Rearrangement; FC, Flow Cytometry; F, Female; FISH, Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization; FLT3, FLT3 Variant; KMT2A, KMT2A Copies; M, Male; NA, Not Available; Ph-like, Philadelphia Chromosome-Like; SB, Southern Blot; Yrs, Years; Pos, Positive; Neg, Negative.

Figure 3

Discussion

KMT2A amplification is a rare genetic abnormality in B-ALL, with few documented cases (Table 1). The aggregated cases summarized in Table 1 indicate that KMT2A-amplified B-ALL predominantly affects older adults, is frequently associated with complex karyotypes involving chromosome band 11q23, a high rate of TP53-related alterations including TP53 variants in three cases and loss of chromosome 17 in one case (45%), CD10 negativity (63%), and carries a poor overall prognosis, with nearly two-thirds of reported patients deceased. Our findings further confirm its strong association with TP53 pathogenic variants. Patient 1 exhibited a clinically significant TP53 missense variant (c.524G>A, p.Arg175His, VAF 91%), a known driver of genomic instability and poor prognosis in hematologic malignancies. This variant disrupts DNA binding, impairing tumor suppression, and promoting genomic instability, therapy resistance, and cancer progression. Additionally, this variant exhibits oncogenic properties, enhancing proliferation, invasion, metabolic reprogramming, and angiogenesis (24). TP53 single nucleotide variants or structural variants were also identified in five previously reported cases, supporting its role as a cooperative oncogenic event in KMT2A-amplified B-ALL. Case 3 exhibited a chromosome 17 loss (20), while case 5 had biallelic TP53 variants (p.Val173Met and p.Val216Met, VAFs 37% and 40%, respectively) (9), suggesting significant TP53 loss. Case 6 showed a TP53 deletion (8), reinforcing the link between TP53 loss and genomic instability, while case 8 carried a TP53 frameshift variant (c.455dupC, p.Pro153Alafs*28, VAFs 49.5–94.1%) (23). Given the frequent co-occurrence of TP53 pathogenic variants and KMT2A amplification, future studies should explore TP53-targeted therapies for this high-risk B-ALL subset. Prior work in therapy-related leukemia has reported an association between KMT2A copy-number gain and germline TP53 alterations (25). However, germline testing was not performed for our patients due to lack of an appropriate non-tumor specimen, and family history was non-contributory based on available documentation. Notably, a very high variant allele fraction (VAF) of 91% was observed for the TP53 variant in Patient 1, which may reflect a homozygous TP53 variant due to copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or a hemizygous TP53 variant resulting from a deletion of the other allele involving this region. However, in the absence of germline testing or detailed family history, it is uncertain what underlies the high allele frequency for this TP53 variant and whether this variant is germline. Future studies should systematically evaluate germline TP53 status in this rare subgroup to clarify inherited versus acquired risk.

KMT2A abnormalities in B-ALL are most described as KMT2A rearrangements, which are frequent in infant ALL. In contrast, KMT2A amplification is a mechanistically distinct alteration involving copy-number gain rather than gene fusion. Although KMT2A rearrangements have been reported in Ph-like ALL, KMT2A amplification has not previously been described in adult Ph-like B-ALL, to the best of our knowledge. Increased KMT2A dosage may lead to partial functional convergence with rearranged cases through dysregulation of shared transcriptional programs such as the HOXA/MEIS1 axis. In this context, this case report identifies the first documented co-occurrence of KMT2A amplification and CRLF2 rearrangement in an adult with de novo Ph-like B-ALL. However, targeted NGS could not be performed for Patient 2 due to rapid clinical deterioration, representing a limitation of this study and an important area for future investigation. CRLF2 rearrangements, a hallmark of Ph-like B-ALL, result in either IGH::CRLF2 or P2RY8::CRLF2 fusion with CRLF2 overexpression, which drive JAK-STAT activation, and are associated with poor treatment response and high relapse rates (12, 13). While well-studied in Ph-like B-ALL, their co-presence in KMT2A-amplified cases remains unreported. Although clonal co-localization could not be directly demonstrated, the high percentage of both abnormalities and the presence of a single dominant blast population strongly support their occurrence within the same leukemic clone, suggesting particularly aggressive disease biology.

Recognition of KMT2A amplification, especially with TP53 alterations and/or CRLF2 rearrangement, has management implications beyond prognosis and should prompt early, genomically informed escalation of care. Menin inhibitors (revumenib, ziftomenib) represent a rational strategy to disrupt KMT2A-associated transcriptional programs (26, 27), while JAK inhibition (ruxolitinib) is supported for CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like B-ALL (28). Combined pathway targeting may be considered in dual-positive cases. Given poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy, early clinical trial referral is warranted, and immunotherapies (blinatumomab, inotuzumab, CAR-T) may serve as bridge or salvage options (2931).

Cytogenetic complexity is another key feature of KMT2A-amplified B-ALL. Both patients exhibited complex karyotypes with multiple chromosomal abnormalities, particularly involving chromosome band 11q23, consistent with previous reports linking KMT2A amplification to genomic instability. Additional copy number abnormalities in genes such as ABL1, BCR, ETV6, and RUNX1 suggest that secondary genetic alterations may further drive disease aggressiveness and therapeutic resistance.

Our review of 11 KMT2A-amplified B-ALL cases (two from our cohort and nine published) highlights key clinical trends. Most patients (82%) were older adults (median age 66), with a poor prognosis, as 81.8% succumbed to the disease. The two survivors were pediatric cases, suggesting age may influence prognosis due to differences in disease biology or treatment response. The observed outcome difference between the deceased and remission groups likely reflects an age-associated difference in clinical course, with pediatric cases clustering in the remission group and older adults predominating among fatal cases. However, this observation is presented for exploratory and descriptive purposes only, as formal statistical comparison is limited by marked age imbalance and small sample size, which limit adjustment for confounders. The CD10 negativity (63%) was common, aligning with the aggressive nature of KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL. Pre-B ALL accounted for 18% of cases, therapy-related B-ALL for 27%, and B-ALL to T-ALL transformation for 9%, with one case of Ph-like B-ALL further expanding the spectrum of high-risk genetic alterations. Given the poor survival and limited treatment options, novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Standard chemotherapy appears ineffective, as shown by rapid disease progression and high mortality. The co-occurrence of KMT2A amplification in this B-ALL entity with TP53 pathogenic variants or CRLF2 rearrangement suggests that targeted therapies, including p53 reactivators, JAK inhibitors, and/or epigenetic modulators, should be explored. The potential role of immunotherapy, such as CAR-T cells or bispecific antibodies, also warrants further investigation.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by UAB IRB-approved protocol (IRB-130710002) titled “Cytogenetics Laboratory Patients Phenotype Information Database.”. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from the human samples used in this study were obtained under a UAB IRB-approved protocol (IRB-130710002) titled “Cytogenetics Laboratory Patients Phenotype Information Database.” This protocol permits the use of phenotypic data collected from patients evaluated in the UAB Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory who were found to have abnormalities through clinical testing. The data were used exclusively for research purposes, including publication, in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

MG: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Investigation. YC: Methodology, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. KB: Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing, Resources. PV: Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis, Resources. OJ: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis. SH: Resources, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. AM: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Formal Analysis. NS: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis. AR: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing – review & editing. BR: Resources, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. AC: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. FM: Resources, Visualization, Data curation, Project administration, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Software, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the patients and their family for their invaluable contribution to this research.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1656404/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    CastiglioniSDi FedeEBernardelliCLettieriAParodiCGrazioliPet al. KMT2A: umbrella gene for multiple diseases. Genes (Basel). (2022) 13:514. doi: 10.3390/genes13030514

  • 2

    GoreckiMKoziolIKopysteckaABudzynskaJZawitkowskaJLejmanM. Updates in KMT2A gene rearrangement in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biomedicines. (2023) 11:746. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030821

  • 3

    Hernandez-SanchezAGonzalezTSobasMStrangECastellaniGAbaigarMet al. Rearrangements involving 11q23.3/KMT2A in adult AML: mutational landscape and prognostic implications - a HARMONY study. Leukemia. (2024) 38:1929–37. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02333-4

  • 4

    HessJL. Mechanisms of transformation by MLL. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. (2004) 14:235–54. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.v14.i4.10

  • 5

    TangGDiNardoCZhangLRavandiFKhouryJDHuhYOet al. MLL gene amplification in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes is associated with characteristic clinicopathological findings and TP53 gene mutation. Hum Pathol. (2015) 46:6573. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.09.008

  • 6

    CuthbertGThompsonKMcCulloughSWatmoreADickinsonHTelfordNet al. MLL amplification in acute leukaemia: a United Kingdom Cancer Cytogenetics Group (UKCCG) study. Leukemia. (2000) 14:1885–91. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401919

  • 7

    AndersenMKChristiansenDHKirchhoffMPedersen-BjergaardJ. Duplication or amplification of chromosome band 11q23, including the unrearranged MLL gene, is a recurrent abnormality in therapy-related MDS and AML, and is closely related to mutation of the TP53 gene and to previous therapy with alkylating agents. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. (2001) 31:3341. doi: 10.1002/gcc.1115

  • 8

    WrenCRebeiroPTeggE. KMT2A amplification in B lymphoblastic leukaemia. Pathology. (2023) 55:738–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.12.356

  • 9

    WangHYLouisHMSCostelloCLMurraySSDell’AquilaML. A CD10-negative adult B-lymphoblastic leukaemia with amplification of KMT2A without rearrangement: A case report and review of the English literature. Br J Haematol. (2024) 205:364–7. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19520

  • 10

    RoblesAIJenJHarrisCC. Clinical outcomes of TP53 mutations in cancers. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2016) 6:a026294. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026294

  • 11

    RivlinNBroshROrenMRotterV. Mutations in the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene: Important Milestones at the Various Steps of Tumorigenesis. Genes Cancer. (2011) 2:466–74. doi: 10.1177/1947601911408889

  • 12

    JainNRobertsKGJabbourEPatelKEterovicAKChenKet al. Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a high-risk subtype in adults. Blood. (2017) 129:572–81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-726588

  • 13

    AlghandourRSakrDHShaabanY. Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the journey from molecular background to the role of bone marrow transplant-review article. Ann Hematol. (2023) 102:1287–300. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05241-2

  • 14

    RobertsKGLiYPayne-TurnerDHarveyRCYangYLPeiDet al. Targetable kinase-activating lesions in Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2014) 371:1005–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403088

  • 15

    GuptaDGVarmaNSreedharanunniSAbdulkadirSANaseemSSachdevaMUSet al. ‘Evaluation of adverse prognostic gene alterations & MRD positivity in BCR::ABL1-like B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients, in a resource-constrained setting. Br J Cancer. (2023) 129:143–52. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02294-y

  • 16

    GaoMChenYLertwilaiwittayaPHurstACEAl-BeshriACarrollAJet al. Constitutional mosaic pericentromeric trisomy 8 in a female patient with aplastic anemia. Am J Med Genet A. (2025) 197:e63951. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63951

  • 17

    HaradaSCalioAJanowskiKMMorloteDRodriguez PenaMDCanete-PortilloSet al. Diagnostic utility of one-stop fusion gene panel to detect TFE3/TFEB gene rearrangement and amplification in renal cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol. (2021) 34:2055–63. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00858-y

  • 18

    HanbazazhMHaradaSReddyVMackinnonACHarbiDMorloteD. The interpretation of sequence variants in myeloid neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol. (2021) 156:728–48. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab039

  • 19

    MaterDVGoodmanBKWangEGacaAMWechslerDS. MLL duplication in a pediatric patient with B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2012) 34:e120–3. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182273b57

  • 20

    EspinetBFlorensaLSalidoMSoleF. MLL intrachromosomal amplification in a pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. (2003) 88:EIM03.

  • 21

    RackeFColeCWalkerAJonesJHeeremaNA. Therapy-related pro-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report of two patients with MLL amplification. Cancer Genet. (2012) 205:653–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.11.001

  • 22

    KeungY-KHJensenHuE. Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia associated with MLL amplification in a patient with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Proc UCLA Health. (2015) 19.

  • 23

    TakedaRYokoyamaKFukuyamaTKawamataTItoMYusaNet al. Repeated lineage switches in an elderly case of refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with MLL gene amplification: A case report and literature review. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:799982. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.799982

  • 24

    ChiangYTChienYCLinYHWuHHLeeDFYuYL. The function of the mutant p53-R175H in cancer. Cancers (Basel). (2021) 13:4088. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164088

  • 25

    FelixCAMegonigalMDChervinskyDSLeonardDGTsuchidaNKakatiSet al. Association of germline p53 mutation with MLL segmental jumping translocation in treatment-related leukemia. Blood. (1998) 91:4451–6.

  • 26

    IssaGCAldossIDiPersioJCuglievanBStoneRArellanoMet al. The menin inhibitor revumenib in KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutant leukaemia. Nature. (2023) 615:920–4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05812-3

  • 27

    WangESIssaGCErbaHPAltmanJKMontesinosPDeBottonSet al. Ziftomenib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (KOMET-001): a multicentre, open-label, multi-cohort, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. (2024) 25:1310–24. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00386-3

  • 28

    BöhmJWSiaKCSJonesCEvansKMarianaAPangIet al. Combination efficacy of ruxolitinib with standard-of-care drugs in CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. (2021) 35:3101–12. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01248-8

  • 29

    KantarjianHSteinAGokbugetNFieldingAKSchuhACRiberaJMet al. Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376:836–47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609783

  • 30

    KantarjianHMDeAngeloDJStelljesMMartinelliGLiedtkeMStockWet al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:740–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509277

  • 31

    MaudeSLLaetschTWBuechnerJRivesSBoyerMBittencourtHet al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:439–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866

Summary

Keywords

B-ALL, complex karyotype, CRLF2 rearrangement, KMT2A amplification, TP53 variant

Citation

Gao M, Chen Y, Bachiashvili K, Vachhani PJ, Jamy O, Harada S, Mackinnon AC, Singh N, Ravindran A, Reddy BV, Carroll AJ and Mikhail FM (2026) Case Report: KMT2A amplification in two adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front. Oncol. 16:1656404. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1656404

Received

30 June 2025

Revised

02 February 2026

Accepted

09 February 2026

Published

26 February 2026

Volume

16 - 2026

Edited by

Adam Finn Binder, Thomas Jefferson University, United States

Reviewed by

Patricia Pérez-Vera, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico

Dikshat Gopal Gupta, Northwestern University, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Fady M. Mikhail,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics