Interleukin-1 receptor blockade in perinatal brain injury
- 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- 2Department of Neuroscience, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- 3Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a potent inflammatory cytokine that can be produced by a variety of cell types throughout the body. While IL-1 is a central mediator of inflammation and response to infection, the role of IL-1 signaling in adult and pediatric brain injury is becoming increasingly clear. Although the mechanisms of IL-1 expression are largely understood, the downstream effects and contributions to excitotoxicity and oxidative stress are poorly defined. Here, we present a review of mechanisms of IL-1 signaling with a focus on the role of IL-1 in perinatal brain injury. We highlight research models of perinatal brain injury and the use of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) as an agent of therapeutic potential in preventing perinatal brain injury due to exposure to inflammation.
Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is the name given to two cytokine peptides, IL-1α and IL-1β, that bind and activate the IL-1 receptor (IL-1R). IL-1 was first called endogenous pyrogen and described as a protein isolated from polymorphonuclear leukocytes, that, when injected into humans or animals, causes fever (1, 2). IL-1 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that mediates the immune response to infection and inflammation and influences a broad range of physiologic activity that includes acute-phase response gene expression, T and B lymphocyte stimulation, cell survival, glial activation, fever, hypotension, and leukopenia (3–6).
Mounting evidence suggests that IL-1 signaling plays a central role in mediating chronic and acute brain injury in both adult and pediatric populations. IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) is an endogenous inhibitor of IL-1 signaling and recombinant IL-1RA is widely used in adults for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease (5). There is emerging evidence that perinatal administration of IL-1RA may confer neuroprotective effects during births at high risk for brain injury (7, 8). Here, we offer a review of IL-1 and the therapeutic potential of IL-1RA in preventing brain injury in neonates following exposure to inflammation [either intrauterine inflammation preceding preterm birth, chorioamnionitis, or birth following hypoxia–ischemia (HI)].
The IL-1R is comprised of two membrane proteins, IL-1R1 and IL-1R accessory protein (IL-1RAcP), and binds IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1RA, and IL-38. IL-1R1 and IL-1RAcP contain an intracellular Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) homology domain that recruits myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MyD88) upon receptor heterodimerization (4, 9). MyD88, an adapter protein, recruits the IL-1R associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), which initiates a signaling cascade by phosphorylating and activating IRAK1, which, in turn, activates and recruits TRAF6 to the IL-1R complex. TRAF6 mediates signaling through two pathways. One pathway leads to the activation of the transcription factor NFκB through the activation of TAB2 and TAK1. The other pathway leads to the activation of the c-jun/c-fos heterodimeric activating protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factor complex through the MAPK/JNK pathway. NFκB and AP-1 activation drives expression of the pro-inflammatory genes TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1, generating an acute-phase response (10, 11).
A decoy receptor made up of IL-1R2 and IL-1RAcP also binds IL-1β but IL-1R2 lacks an intracellular activation domain (12). IL-1α and IL-1β bind IL-1R2 with much greater affinity than IL-1R1. The difference in affinity for the decoy receptor effectively creates a cytokine trap that neutralizes free IL-1 without inflammatory signaling (13). Additionally, an endogenous receptor antagonist, discussed in greater detail below, has a much lower affinity for IL-R2. Together, the decoy receptor and antagonist provide a potent mechanism of regulating IL-1 signaling.
IL-1α and IL-1β
Both IL-1α and IL-1β transcripts are translated into precursor peptides. However, while pro-IL-1β requires proteolytic cleavage to generate the mature, active form of the cytokine, pro-IL-α is functionally active. Thus, IL-1α, which is expressed in epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract, kidney, liver, lung, endothelial cells, and astrocytes, rapidly initiates inflammatory responses when released by necrotic cell death, as occurs following ischemic events. IL-1β is expressed in hematopoietic cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells, monocytes, and microglia, and in endothelial cells. Expression of IL-1β is triggered by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling, IL-6 signaling, or by IL-1β itself. As many cell types express the IL-1R, IL-1 signaling can be paracrine or autocrine. The production and release of IL-1β is highly regulated by cells. TLR signaling is required for the expression and translation of pro-IL-1β. Maturation of IL-1β requires cleavage of pro-IL-1β by Caspase 1. Caspase 1 activity is regulated by the NLRP3 inflammasome. The inflammasome can be activated by numerous stimuli, including pathogen associate molecular patterns (PAMPS), external ATP and glucose, and molecules that signal of stress or danger (14, 15).
IL-1 Receptor Antagonist
The IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) is an endogenous ligand that binds the IL-1R but does not recruit the IL-1RAcP, thereby preventing activation of the receptor (Figure 1). IL-1RA also has a higher affinity for the IL-1R than IL-1α or IL-1β and serves to limit pro-inflammatory IL-1 signaling by blocking binding of the active cytokines (16). Deficiencies in IL-1RA result in a reduction of regulatory function and can result in severe inflammation and autoinflammatory disorders such as arthritis, vasculitis, and skin lesions in humans (17–19). IL-1RA knockout mice develop similar phenotypes to those seen in human disease, including arthropathy and arterial inflammation (20–22).
Figure 1. Mechanism of interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) blockade. IL-1 is produced in response to hypoxia or Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation. The IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) is comprised of an IL-1R1 subunit and an IL-1R accessory protein (IL-1RAcP). IL-1RA binds IL-1R1 with a higher affinity than IL-1α or IL-1β, but does not recruit IL-1RAcP. Without heterodimerization of the IL-1 receptor complex, no signaling occurs. Binding of IL-1α or IL-1β to IL-1R1 recruits IL-1RAcP and intracellular signaling is initiated, leading to the expression of acute-phase response genes such as IL-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). In the brain, these pro-inflammatory cytokines induce neuroinflammation, including neuronal injury and astrogliosis.
IL-1RA, IL-1α, and IL-1β have been shown to cross the blood–brain barrier by a saturable mechanism (23). In rat models of stroke, rIL-RA, delivered subcutaneously or intravenously, can reach therapeutic concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid within 45 min (24, 25). While the placenta can secrete IL-RA in response to lipopolysaccharide, to date, no studies have addressed placental transfer of rIL-1RA (26). Placental perfusion studies have found that several cytokines, including IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6, do not cross the placenta and this may hold true for rIL-1RA (27–29). Pharmacokinetic studies are warranted to determine the potential efficacy of maternally administered rIL-1RA in the setting of preterm birth. In considering possible future clinical applications, rIL-1RA may need to be delivered via amniocentesis if placental transfer is insufficient to generate therapeutic doses in the fetal compartment. With future advances and knowledge of molecular action of IL-1RA, we speculate that small molecules may be designed that will mimic IL-1RA activity and would be able to cross the placenta.
Clinical Trials with IL-1RA
In 1993, Amgen introduced the first drug targeting IL-1 signaling, a recombinant IL-1RA (rIL-1RA), Anakinra (Kineret). rIL-1RA is produced in E. coli and was approved by the FDA for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in 2001. In 2012, rIL-RA was approved for treatment of neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID). Five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that included over 3000 patients were conducted (30–34). Mertens and Singh offer a critical review of the rIL-1RA clinical trials (35). Briefly, the trials found rIL-1RA to be significantly more effective than placebo in improving outcomes with no difference in adverse events, deaths, and study withdrawals.
Interest in recombinant rIL-1RA therapy for additional diseases continues, and at this time there are 21 ongoing clinical trials to treat a range of diseases including diabetes, breast cancer, chronic fatigue, and heart failure (Table 1). Recent mechanistic studies have reported that rIL-1RA has neuroprotective effects in rodent models of perinatal brain injury (7, 8, 24, 25).
IL-1RA in Brain Injury
Many antenatal, perinatal, or postnatal factors, whether genetic or environmental, can lead to postnatal brain injury. Chronic events prior to parturition may be of greater importance than acute events, as the chronic conditions may be overlooked until postnatal clinical symptoms are evident. Additionally, the timing of the insult influences the nature of the brain injury. Preterm infants are more likely to suffer from intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, while term infants experience focal ischemia, injury to basal ganglia, and subcortical hemorrhage (36).
Pathogen-induced inflammation and/or HI are the major insults resulting in postnatal neurological impairment through the release of inflammatory mediators, such as members of the IL-1 family (37–43). Human neuropathological studies and experimental animal models of postnatal brain injury reveal that pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-1β, are implicated in the cascade leading to brain damage at different developmental stages (41, 44–50). Therefore, postnatal systemic administration of IL-1RA may be a potential therapeutic intervention of postnatal brain injury (7, 51).
IL-1RA and Pathogenic Models of Postnatal Brain Injury
Several models of inflammatory postnatal brain injury have been developed in different species, including mouse (52–56), rat (57–59), rabbit (60, 61), dog (62), and others (63). Rodent models are most widely used due to ease of use and relatively short reproductive cycle. Administration of pathogens, such as virus (52), bacteria (64), pathogenic infectious components (57, 61), and pro-inflammatory cytokines (46, 65) varies widely between models in timing, from prenatal to postnatal stage, and route of delivery, whether intranasal (52, 66), intravenous (67), intrauterine (68, 69), intraperitoneal (59), or intracerebral injection (70).
IL-1RA has been shown to be neuroprotective (71–73) in animal models of traumatic brain injury and excitotoxicity in vivo and in vitro, in which IL-1β exerts a dominant role pathologically. In rodent models of postnatal brain injury, the elevation of IL-1β and other pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed (69, 74, 75), indicating the importance of the IL-1β signaling pathway in postnatal brain injury. Leitner et al. applied rIL-1RA systemically at embryonic day 15, 30 min prior to administration of intrauterine injection of lipopolysaccharide. They found rIL-1RA improved fetal cortical neuronal injury without affecting the rate of preterm birth. This might be via the blockade of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (8). Furthermore, Girard et al. administrated a low dose of rIL-1RA to pups in a systemic inflammatory animal model and a hypoxic-ischemia model postnatally (7, 76). This treatment preserved motor function and exploratory behavior. Neuroprotective effects were evident by increased neural stem cell populations, prevention of myelin loss, and decreased gliosis. This study provides a potential candidate for postnatal treatment of brain injury, especially in the earliest days of life in the term infant. Savard et al. used systemic infection–inflammation combined with HI in a rat model at postnatal day 12, which exerted a synergistic detrimental effect on rat brain, leading to a peculiar pattern of parasagittal cortical–subcortical infarcts mimicking those in the human full-term newborn with subsequent severe neurodevelopmental impairments. rIL-1RA administration reduced the extent of brain lesions by MRI observation (50).
IL-1RA and Hypoxia–Ischemia Associated Postnatal Brain Injury Model
Hypoxia–ischemia is another common cause of postnatal brain injury. The most widely used HI model is the Vannucci model, which combines permanent unilateral ligation of the carotid artery in 7-day-old rat pups, along with exposure to hypoxia (77–80). Increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β is associated with HI-induced postnatal brain injury (81–83).
Experimental administration of rIL-1RA has been demonstrated to reduce HI-induced postnatal brain injury (84–86). Martin et al. injected rIL-1RA subcutaneously in a postnatal rat HI model and found prior to or after HI, rIL-1RA ameliorated the ischemia damage as measured by hemisphere dry weights and prevented neuronal loss in the striatum (87). Hu et al. injected 2 μg rIL-1RA intra-cerebroventricularly 2 h after HI and found a significant reduction in cell death and Caspase 3 activity. The observed increase in cytoplasmic NFκB activation and nuclear translocation of Bcl-3 24 h after HI was also significantly attenuated by IL-1 blockade, suggesting that HI-induced IL-1 activation is via both the NFκB activation and the nuclear translocation of Bcl-3 (88).
Though a rapidly expanding body of evidence indicates that rIL-1RA is a promising therapeutic for postnatal brain injury, the specific signaling mechanisms triggered by rIL-1RA responsible for the effects are still not fully known. A number of drawbacks of rIL-1RA limit its broader use; these include injection site reactions (89, 90), broad immunosuppression (90), and high costs. Trials to test safety in a pediatric population are sorely needed as a lack of efficacy and safety data limits the adoption of rIL-1RA for perinatal brain injury.
During infection and inflammation, the potent effects of IL-1 signaling can lead to devastating tissue damage with long-lasting effects. Therapies that block IL-1 signaling have been successful in reducing negative outcomes in autoinflammatory diseases in adults for over a decade now. Exciting research in the area of neonatal encephalopathy suggests that the benefits of IL-1 blockade in reducing injury in autoinflammatory diseases may be extended to neonatal brain injury and offer much needed neuroprotection for a population with limited effective treatment options.
Neonatal encephalopathy affects up to 1% of live births (91–93) and the causes can vary from hypoxic–ischemic events to intrauterine inflammation (37, 38, 40–43). Treatment options are limited and the current standard of care prescribes therapeutic hypothermia (94). Hypothermia, however, does not confer complete neuroprotection and as many as 50% of treated neonates will experience moderate to severe neurologic disability (95). Common processes that contribute to neuronal injury, including oxidative stress, apoptosis, inflammation, and excitotoxicity, are increasingly the targets of emerging therapies for neonatal encephalopathy.
As a Class B drug, rIL-1RA is approved for use in pregnant women and may be offered in the future as a perinatal intervention to prevent perinatal brain injury due to neonatal encephalopathy or due to exposure to intrauterine inflammation. However, rIL-1RA is not approved for the treatment or prevention of perinatal brain injury, and further studies are needed to determine its safety and efficacy. At this time, little is known in regards to the importance of IL-1 in brain formation or the development of the immature immune system; therefore, further evaluation of this molecule is necessary to establish appropriate safe timing of its administration for variety of etiologies of perinatal brain injury. Furthermore, no studies have yet been conducted to assess the efficacy of rIL-1RA in combination with other therapies, such as hypothermia, although other combination therapies (hypothermia and erythropoietin) have shown promise in rodent models (96, 97). Mechanistic studies of r-IL1RA, as we are conducting, are ongoing to evaluate maternal–fetal transfer and developmental effects in animal models.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
7. Girard S, Sebire H, Brochu ME, Briota S, Sarret P, Sebire G. Postnatal administration of IL-1Ra exerts neuroprotective effects following perinatal inflammation and/or hypoxic-ischemic injuries. Brain Behav Immun (2012) 26(8):1331–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2012.09.001
8. Leitner K, Al Shammary M, McLane M, Johnston MV, Elovitz MA, Burd I. IL-1 receptor blockade prevents fetal cortical brain injury but not preterm birth in a mouse model of inflammation-induced preterm birth and perinatal brain injury. Am J Reprod Immunol (2014) 71(5):418–26. doi:10.1111/aji.12216
9. Dunne A, O’Neill LA. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal transduction during inflammation and host defense. Sci STKE (2003) 2003(171):re3. doi:10.1126/stke.2003.171.re3
11. Casanova JL, Abel L, Quintana-Murci L. Human TLRs and IL-1Rs in host defense: natural insights from evolutionary, epidemiological, and clinical genetics. Annu Rev Immunol (2011) 29:447–91. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101335
12. McMahan CJ, Slack JL, Mosley B, Cosman D, Lupton SD, Brunton LL, et al. A novel IL-1 receptor, cloned from B cells by mammalian expression, is expressed in many cell types. EMBO J (1991) 10(10):2821–32.
13. Hannum CH, Wilcox CJ, Arend WP, Joslin FG, Dripps DJ, Heimdal PL, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist activity of a human interleukin-1 inhibitor. Nature (1990) 343(6256):336–40. doi:10.1038/343336a0
14. Mariathasan S, Newton K, Monack DM, Vucic D, French DM, Lee WP, et al. Differential activation of the inflammasome by caspase-1 adaptors ASC and Ipaf. Nature (2004) 430(6996):213–8. doi:10.1038/nature02664
17. Aksentijevich I, Masters SL, Ferguson PJ, Dancey P, Frenkel J, van Royen-Kerkhoff A, et al. An autoinflammatory disease with deficiency of the interleukin-1-receptor antagonist. N Engl J Med (2009) 360(23):2426–37. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807865
19. Reddy S, Jia S, Geoffrey R, Lorier R, Suchi M, Broeckel U, et al. An autoinflammatory disease due to homozygous deletion of the IL1RN locus. N Engl J Med (2009) 360(23):2438–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0809568
20. Horai R, Asano M, Sudo K, Kanuka H, Suzuki M, Nishihara M, et al. Production of mice deficient in genes for interleukin (IL)-1alpha, IL-1beta, IL-1alpha/beta, and IL-1 receptor antagonist shows that IL-1beta is crucial in turpentine-induced fever development and glucocorticoid secretion. J Exp Med (1998) 187(9):1463–75. doi:10.1084/jem.187.9.1463
21. Horai R, Saijo S, Tanioka H, Nakae S, Sudo K, Okahara A, et al. Development of chronic inflammatory arthropathy resembling rheumatoid arthritis in interleukin 1 receptor antagonist-deficient mice. J Exp Med (2000) 191(2):313–20. doi:10.1084/jem.191.2.313
24. Greenhalgh AD, Galea J, Denes A, Tyrrell PJ, Rothwell NJ. Rapid brain penetration of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in rat cerebral ischaemia: pharmacokinetics, distribution, protection. Br J Pharmacol (2010) 160(1):153–9. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00684.x
25. Galea J, Ogungbenro K, Hulme S, Greenhalgh A, Aarons L, Scarth S, et al. Intravenous anakinra can achieve experimentally effective concentrations in the central nervous system within a therapeutic time window: results of a dose-ranging study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2011) 31(2):439–47. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.103
26. Amash A, Holcberg G, Sapir O, Huleihel M. Placental secretion of interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in preeclampsia: effect of magnesium sulfate. J Interferon Cytokine Res (2012) 32(9):432–41. doi:10.1089/jir.2012.0013
27. Reisenberger K, Egarter C, Vogl S, Sternberger B, Kiss H, Husslein P. The transfer of interleukin-8 across the human placenta perfused in vitro. Obstet Gynecol (1996) 87(4):613–6. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00473-4
30. Bresnihan B, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Cobby M, Doherty M, Domljan Z, Emery P, et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Arthritis Rheum (1998) 41(12):2196–204. doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199812)41:12<2196::AID-ART15>3.3.CO;2-U
31. Cohen S, Hurd E, Cush J, Schiff M, Weinblatt ME, Moreland LW, et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in combination with methotrexate: results of a twenty-four-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum (2002) 46(3):614–24. doi:10.1002/art.10103
32. Fleischmann RM, Schechtman J, Bennett R, Handel ML, Burmester GR, Tesser J, et al. Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (r-metHuIL-1ra), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a large, international, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 48(4):927–34. doi:10.1002/art.10870
33. Cohen SB, Moreland LW, Cush JJ, Greenwald MW, Block S, Shergy WJ, et al. A multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of anakinra (Kineret), a recombinant interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with background methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis (2004) 63(9):1062–8. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.016014
34. Genovese MC, Cohen S, Moreland L, Lium D, Robbins S, Newmark R, et al. Combination therapy with etanercept and anakinra in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50(5):1412–9. doi:10.1002/art.20221
36. Van den Broeck C, Himpens E, Vanhaesebrouck P, Calders P, Oostra A. Influence of gestational age on the type of brain injury and neuromotor outcome in high-risk neonates. Eur J Pediatr (2008) 167(9):1005–9. doi:10.1007/s00431-007-0629-2
41. Arrode-Bruses G, Bruses JL. Maternal immune activation by poly I:C induces expression of cytokines IL-1beta and IL-13, chemokine MCP-1 and colony stimulating factor VEGF in fetal mouse brain. J Neuroinflammation (2012) 9:83. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-9-83
42. Hagberg H, Gressens P, Mallard C. Inflammation during fetal and neonatal life: implications for neurologic and neuropsychiatric disease in children and adults. Ann Neurol (2012) 71(4):444–57. doi:10.1002/ana.22620
44. Allan SM, Pinteaux E. The interleukin-1 system: an attractive and viable therapeutic target in neurodegenerative disease. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord (2003) 2(5):293–302. doi:10.2174/1568007033482742
46. Cai Z, Lin S, Pang Y, Rhodes PG. Brain injury induced by intracerebral injection of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the neonatal rat. Pediatr Res (2004) 56(3):377–84. doi:10.1203/01.PDR.0000134249.92944.14
48. Thornton P, Pinteaux E, Gibson RM, Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Interleukin-1-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by glia and requires caspase activation and free radical release. J Neurochem (2006) 98(1):258–66. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03872.x
50. Savard A, Lavoie K, Brochu ME, Grbic D, Lepage M, Gris D, et al. Involvement of neuronal IL-1beta in acquired brain lesions in a rat model of neonatal encephalopathy. J Neuroinflammation (2013) 10:110. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-10-110
51. Green HF, Treacy E, Keohane AK, Sullivan AM, O’Keeffe GW, Nolan YM. A role for interleukin-1beta in determining the lineage fate of embryonic rat hippocampal neural precursor cells. Mol Cell Neurosci (2012) 49(3):311–21. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2012.01.001
52. Fatemi SH, Emamian ES, Sidwell RW, Kist DA, Stary JM, Earle JA, et al. Human influenza viral infection in utero alters glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity in the developing brains of neonatal mice. Mol Psychiatry (2002) 7(6):633–40. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001046
53. Aden U, Favrais G, Plaisant F, Winerdal M, Felderhoff-Mueser U, Lampa J, et al. Systemic inflammation sensitizes the neonatal brain to excitotoxicity through a pro-/anti-inflammatory imbalance: key role of TNFalpha pathway and protection by etanercept. Brain Behav Immun (2010) 24(5):747–58. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2009.10.010
54. Chang EY, Zhang J, Sullivan S, Newman R, Singh I. N-acetylcysteine attenuates the maternal and fetal proinflammatory response to intrauterine LPS injection in an animal model for preterm birth and brain injury. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med (2011) 24(5):732–40. doi:10.3109/14767058.2010.528089
56. Dada T, Rosenzweig JM, Al Shammary M, Firdaus W, Al Rebh S, Borbiev T, et al. Mouse model of intrauterine inflammation: sex-specific differences in long-term neurologic and immune sequelae. Brain Behav Immun (2014) 38:142–50. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2014.01.014
58. Auvin S, Shin D, Mazarati A, Nakagawa J, Miyamoto J, Sankar R. Inflammation exacerbates seizure-induced injury in the immature brain. Epilepsia (2007) 48(Suppl 5):27–34. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01239.x
59. Beloosesky R, Ginsberg Y, Khatib N, Maravi N, Ross MG, Itskovitz-Eldor J, et al. Prophylactic maternal N-acetylcysteine in rats prevents maternal inflammation-induced offspring cerebral injury shown on magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2013) 208(3):e211–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.023
60. Hagberg H, Peebles D, Mallard C. Models of white matter injury: comparison of infectious, hypoxic-ischemic, and excitotoxic insults. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev (2002) 8(1):30–8. doi:10.1002/mrdd.10020
61. Kannan S, Saadani-Makki F, Muzik O, Chakraborty P, Mangner TJ, Janisse J, et al. Microglial activation in perinatal rabbit brain induced by intrauterine inflammation: detection with 11C-(R)-PK11195 and small-animal PET. J Nucl Med (2007) 48(6):946–54. doi:10.2967/jnumed.106.038539
62. Young RS, Hernandez MJ, Yagel SK. Selective reduction of blood flow to white matter during hypotension in newborn dogs: a possible mechanism of periventricular leukomalacia. Ann Neurol (1982) 12(5):445–8. doi:10.1002/ana.410120506
63. Yawno T, Schuilwerve J, Moss TJ, Vosdoganes P, Westover AJ, Afandi E, et al. Human amnion epithelial cells reduce fetal brain injury in response to intrauterine inflammation. Dev Neurosci (2013) 35(2–3):272–82. doi:10.1159/000346683
64. Debillon T, Gras-Leguen C, Verielle V, Winer N, Caillon J, Roze JC, et al. Intrauterine infection induces programmed cell death in rabbit periventricular white matter. Pediatr Res (2000) 47(6):736–42. doi:10.1203/00006450-200006000-00009
65. Fan LW, Tien LT, Zheng B, Pang Y, Rhodes PG, Cai Z. Interleukin-1beta-induced brain injury and neurobehavioral dysfunctions in juvenile rats can be attenuated by alpha-phenyl-n-tert-butyl-nitrone. Neuroscience (2010) 168(1):240–52. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.024
67. Meyer U, Feldon J, Schedlowski M, Yee BK. Immunological stress at the maternal-foetal interface: a link between neurodevelopment and adult psychopathology. Brain Behav Immun (2006) 20(4):378–88. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2005.11.003
68. Cai Z, Pan ZL, Pang Y, Evans OB, Rhodes PG. Cytokine induction in fetal rat brains and brain injury in neonatal rats after maternal lipopolysaccharide administration. Pediatr Res (2000) 47(1):64–72. doi:10.1203/00006450-200001000-00013
69. Burd I, Brown A, Gonzalez JM, Chai J, Elovitz MA. A mouse model of term chorioamnionitis: unraveling causes of adverse neurological outcomes. Reprod Sci (2011) 18(9):900–7. doi:10.1177/1933719111398498
70. Cai Z, Fan LW, Lin S, Pang Y, Rhodes PG. Intranasal administration of insulin-like growth factor-1 protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced injury in the developing rat brain. Neuroscience (2011) 194:195–207. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.08.003
71. Hagan P, Barks JD, Yabut M, Davidson BL, Roessler B, Silverstein FS. Adenovirus-mediated over-expression of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist reduces susceptibility to excitotoxic brain injury in perinatal rats. Neuroscience (1996) 75(4):1033–45. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(96)00225-4
72. Ide CF, Scripter JL, Coltman BW, Dotson RS, Snyder DC, Jelaso A. Cellular and molecular correlates to plasticity during recovery from injury in the developing mammalian brain. Prog Brain Res (1996) 108:365–77. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62552-2
73. Scripter JL, Ko J, Kow K, Arimura A, Ide CF. Regulation by interleukin-1beta of formation of a line of delimiting astrocytes following prenatal trauma to the brain of the mouse. Exp Neurol (1997) 145(2 Pt 1):329–41. doi:10.1006/exnr.1997.6470
74. Yoon BH, Romero R, Jun JK, Park KH, Park JD, Ghezzi F, et al. Amniotic fluid cytokines (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, and interleukin-8) and the risk for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1997) 177(4):825–30. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70276-X
75. Kadhim H, Tabarki B, De Prez C, Sebire G. Cytokine immunoreactivity in cortical and subcortical neurons in periventricular leukomalacia: are cytokines implicated in neuronal dysfunction in cerebral palsy? Acta Neuropathol (2003) 105(3):209–16. doi:10.1007/s00401-002-0633-6
76. Girard S, Sebire G, Kadhim H. Proinflammatory orientation of the interleukin 1 system and downstream induction of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in the pathophysiology of human perinatal white matter damage. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol (2010) 69(11):1116–29. doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181f971e4
80. Falahati S, Breu M, Waickman AT, Phillips AW, Arauz EJ, Snyder S, et al. Ischemia-induced neuroinflammation is associated with disrupted development of oligodendrocyte progenitors in a model of periventricular leukomalacia. Dev Neurosci (2013) 35(2–3):182–96. doi:10.1159/000346682
84. Park EM, Cho BP, Volpe BT, Cruz MO, Joh TH, Cho S. Ibuprofen protects ischemia-induced neuronal injury via up-regulating interleukin-1 receptor antagonist expression. Neuroscience (2005) 132(3):625–31. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.021
85. Quiniou C, Kooli E, Joyal JS, Sapieha P, Sennlaub F, Lahaie I, et al. Interleukin-1 and ischemic brain injury in the newborn: development of a small molecule inhibitor of IL-1 receptor. Semin Perinatol (2008) 32(5):325–33. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2008.07.001
86. Wang CH, Wang WT, Cheng SY, Hung WT, Wu TL, Hsueh CM. Leptin and interleukin-1beta modulate neuronal glutamate release and protect against glucose-oxygen-serum deprivation. Curr Neurovasc Res (2010) 7(3):223–37. doi:10.2174/156720210791184925
87. Martin D, Chinookoswong N, Miller G. The interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) protects against cerebral infarction in a rat model of hypoxia-ischemia. Exp Neurol (1994) 130(2):362–7. doi:10.1006/exnr.1994.1215
88. Hu X, Nesic-Taylor O, Qiu J, Rea HC, Fabian R, Rassin DK, et al. Activation of nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathway by interleukin-1 after hypoxia/ischemia in neonatal rat hippocampus and cortex. J Neurochem (2005) 93(1):26–37. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02968.x
89. Campion GV, Lebsack ME, Lookabaugh J, Gordon G, Catalano M. Dose-range and dose-frequency study of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The IL-1Ra Arthritis Study Group. Arthritis Rheum (1996) 39(7):1092–101. doi:10.1002/art.1780390704
90. Nuki G, Bresnihan B, Bear MB, McCabe D. Long-term safety and maintenance of clinical improvement following treatment with anakinra (recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: extension phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum (2002) 46(11):2838–46. doi:10.1002/art.10578
92. Pierrat V, Haouari N, Liska A, Thomas D, Subtil D, Truffert P. Prevalence, causes, and outcome at 2 years of age of newborn encephalopathy: population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed (2005) 90(3):F257–61. doi:10.1136/adc.2003.047985
93. Graham EM, Ruis KA, Hartman AL, Northington FJ, Fox HE. A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2008) 199(6):587–95. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.094
94. D’Alton ME, Hankins GDV, Berkowitz RL, Bienstock J, Ghidini A, Goldsmith J, et al. Executive summary: neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ task force on neonatal encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol (2014) 123(4):896–901.
95. Edwards AD, Brocklehurst P, Gunn AJ, Halliday H, Juszczak E, Levene M, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. BMJ (2010) 340:c363. doi:10.1136/bmj.c363
96. Fan X, van Bel F, van der Kooij MA, Heijnen CJ, Groenendaal F. Hypothermia and erythropoietin for neuroprotection after neonatal brain damage. Pediatr Res (2013) 73(1):18–23. doi:10.1038/pr.2012.139
Keywords: IL-1, rIL-RA, perinatal brain injury, IL-1beta, Kineret
Citation: Rosenzweig JM, Lei J and Burd I (2014) Interleukin-1 receptor blockade in perinatal brain injury. Front. Pediatr. 2:108. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00108
Received: 23 July 2014; Accepted: 23 September 2014;
Published online: 07 October 2014.
Edited by:Maged Costantine, University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
Reviewed by:Laura Haneline, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA
Sunil K. Jain, University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
Antonio Saad, University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
Copyright: © 2014 Rosenzweig, Lei and Burd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Irina Burd, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Phipps 228, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA e-mail: email@example.com