%A Hennus,Pauline M. L. %A Hoenjet,Esther %A Kieft,Jan H. %A de Jong,Tom P. V. M. %A de Kort,Laetitia M. O. %D 2017 %J Frontiers in Pediatrics %C %F %G English %K bladder neck incision,boys,long-term follow-up,Retrograde ejaculation,incontinence %Q %R 10.3389/fped.2017.00152 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2017-July-13 %9 Original Research %+ Pauline M. L. Hennus,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht,Netherlands,paulinehennus@gmail.com %# %! The long-term effect of superficial bladder neck incision in boys %* %< %T The Long-term Effect of Superficial Bladder Neck Incision on Ejaculation and Incontinence in Boys with Primary and Secondary Bladder Neck Obstruction %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2017.00152 %V 5 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 2296-2360 %X ObjectiveSuperficial bladder neck incision (SBNI) is controversial at young age, with retrograde ejaculation after puberty as main concern. The aim of the study is to investigate the long-term effect of SBNI on ejaculation and incontinence in boys with primary and secondary bladder neck obstruction (BNO).Materials and methodsIn boys with infravesical obstruction, SBNI was performed in case of a persistent BNO after earlier desobstruction or in case of primary severely obstructive bladder neck. SBNI was performed with a diathermy hook, always superficially (2–3 mm) and unilaterally at 7 O’clock. Males that had SBNI during childhood after posterior urethral valve incision or relief of other obstruction between 1986 and 2003 were included. Evaluation was done by International Continence Society male sex questionnaire, International Prostate Symptom Score, developmental International Consultation Modular Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence, frequency volume chart, and uroflowmetry.ResultsOf 79 traceable patients, 40 (50.6%) participated. Of these, 37 (92.5%) completed all questionnaires and 28 (70%) performed uroflowmetry. Median age at SBNI was 4.7 years [interquartile range (IQR) 0.6–8.5] and was 19.6 years (IQR 17.3–20.9) at follow-up. All men had antegrade ejaculation, 4/37 (10.8%) reported possibly reduced ejaculatory volume. Eight (22%) had moderate lower urinary tract symptoms and two (5.4%) had moderate incontinence. Median maximum flow rate was 30.1 mL/s (IQR 24.4–42.6).ConclusionSBNI in boys with severe infravesical obstruction can be done safely with preservation of antegrade ejaculation and no additional lower urinary tract dysfunction.