Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation: Neither Interventional Nor Surgery Fits All
Antonio F. Corno1,2*- 1East Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- 2Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
Introduction: PV implantation is indicated for severe PV regurgitation after surgery for congenital heart defects, but debates accompany the following issues: timing of PV implantation; choice of the approach, percutaneous interventional vs. surgical PV implantation, and choice of the most suitable valve.
Timing of pulmonary valve implantation: The presence of symptoms is class I evidence indication for PV implantation. In asymptomatic patients indication is agreed for any of the following criteria: PV regurgitation > 20%, indexed end-diastolic right ventricular volume > 120–150 ml/m2 BSA, and indexed end-systolic right ventricular volume > 80–90 ml/m2 BSA.
Choice of the approach: percutaneous interventional vs. surgical: The choice of the approach depends upon the morphology and the size of the right ventricular outflow tract, the morphology and the size of the pulmonary arteries, the presence of residual intra-cardiac defects and the presence of extremely dilated right ventricle.
Choice of the most suitable valve for surgical implantation: Biological valves are first choice in most of the reported studies. A relatively large size of the biological prosthesis presents the advantage of avoiding a right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and also of allowing for future percutaneous valve-in-valve implantation. Alternatively, biological valved conduits can be implanted between the right ventricle and pulmonary artery, particularly when a reconstruction of the main pulmonary artery and/or its branches is required.
Hybrid options: combination of interventional and surgical: Many progresses extended the implantation of a PV with combined hybrid interventional and surgical approaches. Major efforts have been made to overcome the current limits of percutaneous PV implantation, namely the excessive size of a dilated right ventricular outflow tract and the absence of a cylindrical geometry of the right ventricular outflow tract as a suitable landing for a percutaneous PV implantation.
Conclusion: Despite tremendous progress obtained with modern technologies, and the endless fantasy of researchers trying to explore new forms of treatment, it is too early to say that either the interventional or the surgical approach to implant a PV can fit all patients with good long-term results.
Introduction
The pulmonary valve (PV) regurgitation following the surgical repair of congenital heart defects is generally tolerated quite well in the immediate post-operative period and for the first few years (1). However, on longer-term clinical observations the presence of severe PV regurgitation can be associated with exercise intolerance, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias with syncope episodes and sudden death (2–10). These symptoms are related to right ventricular volume and/or pressure overload, inducing dilatation and dysfunction, and ultimately right ventricular failure (5, 8, 9, 11); sometimes the clinical conditions are further deteriorated by the subsequent impairment of the left ventricular function (8).
PV implantation reduces the right ventricular end diastolic volume, preventing pathological right ventricular remodeling, and restores the right ventricular function, preventing progressive dilatation toward right ventricular failure (7, 9, 11–16).
With regard to the need for a PV implantation in the presence of severe PV regurgitation, extensive debates accompany the following issues:
a) timing of PV implantation, particularly in asymptomatic patients (5–7, 9, 13– 24)
b) choice of the approach, percutaneous interventional (5, 25–38) vs. surgical (7, 9, 11–18, 39–44) PV implantation
c) choice of the most suitable valve (2, 39–43, 45–53).
Timing of Pulmonary Valve Implantation
In the presence of PV regurgitation, the presence of clinical symptoms clearly corresponds to class I evidence of indication for PV implantation in both the European (19) and North-American (20) guidelines (5, 7, 9, 13–18, 21–24).
In asymptomatic patients the criteria for indications for PV implantation, and particularly the choice of the best timing, are less clearly defined (54). General agreement exists on the indication in asymptomatic patients in the presence of any of the following criteria, as judged by echocardiography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (13, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24):
a) PV regurgitation > 20%
b) indexed end-diastolic right ventricular volume >120–150 ml/m2 BSA
c) indexed end-systolic right ventricular volume > 80–90 ml/m2 BSA
Choice of the Approach: Percutaneous Interventional vs. Surgical
The choice between the approach with percutaneous interventional (5, 25–38) vs. surgical (8, 9, 11–18, 39–43) PV implantation is generally the result of a decision making process taking into consideration:
a) morphology and size of the right ventricular outflow tract, in particular in the presence of a previously implanted trans-annular patch
b) morphology and size of the pulmonary arteries in the case a required enlargement or reconstruction
c) presence of residual intra-cardiac defects
d) presence of extremely dilated and dysfunctional right ventricle (52, 55–57)
If reconstruction of the pulmonary artery branches, or closure of residual intra-cardiac defects, or remodeling of a hugely dilated right ventricle, are required in association with the PV implantation, and these cannot be accomplished by a procedure of interventional cardiology, then the indication is given for surgical implantation of a PV or a right-ventricle to pulmonary artery valved conduit (7, 9, 11–18, 39–44).
Choice of the Most Suitable Valve for Surgical Implantation
Regarding the choice of the most suitable valve to implant in PV position, the first choice is not for a mechanical prosthesis, despite the proven longevity, because of the risks of thromboembolic phenomena and the requirement for life-long anticoagulation (41, 48), with tissue valves considered as the first choice for PV implantation (2, 39–49). Despite the various models of biological valves available for implantation in PV position, the optimal valve choice remains unknown, partly because long-term out-comes are deficient owing to structural valve deterioration necessitating further treatment (48).
The Trifecta® (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA) valve, tri-leaflet stented pericardial valve designed for implantation in aortic position, with a supra-annular sewing cuff, pericardial-covered posts, pericardial leaflets taking origin from the exterior of the valve construct, increasing the effective orifice area for any external diameter, provided good results in PV position (51, 52).
These characteristics should provide a reduced rate of structural valve deterioration over time, particularly because previous studies showed that PV implantation performed in young patients, with relatively smaller size biological valves, correlated with a higher risk of valve failure and need for early valve re-replacement (45, 46).
Regarding the size of the valve to implant in PV position, our choice is to implant a relatively large size of the biological prosthesis, adequate for the effective orifice area of the native PV indexed for the patient BSA (52). This choice presents the advantage not only of avoiding a right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, but also of allowing for future percutaneous valve-in-valve implantation in the case of degeneration of the currently implanted valve (52). Of course we very carefully avoided oversizing the valve, because of the well-known reduced duration of oversized biological valves.
Alternatively, biological valved conduits, such as homografts, bovine jugular veins, or Hancock® conduits (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA), can be used as PV, with the implantation accomplished between the right ventricle and pulmonary artery. As this surgical approach is more extensive than the simple PV implantation, the choice of right ventricle to pulmonary artery biological conduit for PV regurgitation is particularly utilized when the reconstruction of the main pulmonary artery and/or its branches is required (50, 53, 58).
Hybrid Options: Combination of Interventional and Surgery
Since the first clinical report of interventional implantation of a pulmonary valve in a right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit with valve dysfunction (59) and our report of the first of-bypass surgical implantation of a pulmonary valve of large size, through a purse string on the anterior surface of the right ventricle, in an experimental model (60), many progresses have been made to extend the implantation of a pulmonary valve with combined hybrid interventional and surgical approaches, with generally good results (61–68).
The major efforts have been made to extend the PV implantation in the presence of dilated right ventricular outflow tract, previously the major limit to the use of interventional technique (63–67). These included pre-stenting in preparation for the later implant of the biological valve (63), simultaneous pre-stenting and implantation (64), valve implantation after a PTFE graft positioning in the dilated right ventricular outflow tract with surgical approach on cardiopulmonary bypass, using the PTFE graft as landing site for the valve (65), and surgical implantation of a percutaneous biological valve after placing a 4 mm PTFE graft wrapped around the valve (67).
All the above reported techniques, very recently reported in the literature, clearly express the attempt of overcoming the current limits of percutaneous PV implantation, namely the excessive size of a dilated right ventricular outflow tract and the absence of a cylindrical geometry of the right ventricular outflow tract as a suitable landing for a percutaneous PV implantation.
Conclusion
Despite the tremendous progress obtained with the availability of modern technologies, and the endless fantasy of researchers trying to explore new forms of treatment, at the moment it is too early to say that either the interventional or the surgical approach to implant a PV can fit all patients with good long-term results.
Author Contributions
AC provided the conception and design of the article, drafted the work and revised for the content, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Babu-Narayan SV, Diller G, Gheta RR, Bastin AJ, Karonis T, Li W, et al. Clinical outcomes of surgical pulmonary valve replacement after repair of tetralogy of Fallot and potential prognostic value of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation (2014) 129:18–27. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001485
2. Nollert G, Fischlein T, Bouterwek S, Böhmer C, Klinner W, Reichart B. Long-term survival in patients with repair of tetralogy of Fallot: 36-year follow-up of 490 survivors of the first year after surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. (1997) 30:1374–83. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00318-5
3. Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, Siu SC, Hokanson JS, Poile C, et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicenter study. Lancet (2000) 356:975–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02714-8
4. Geva T, Sandweiss BM, Gauvreau K, Lock JE, Powell AJ. Factors associated with impaired clinical status in long-term survivors of tetralogy of Fallot repair evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2004) 43:1068–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.045
5. Tretter JT, Friedberg MK, Wald RM, McElhinney DB. Defining and refining indications for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: contributions from anatomical and functional imaging. Int J Cardiol. (2016) 221:916–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.120
6. Kim YY, Ruckdeschel E. Approach to residual pulmonary valve dysfunction in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Heart (2016) 102:1520–6. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309067
7. Bokma JP, Winter MM, Oosterhof T, Vliegen HW, van Dijk AP, Pieper PG, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement after repair of pulmonary stenosis compared with tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2016) 67:1123–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.032
8. Westhoff-Bleck M, Kornau F, Haghikia A, Horke A, Bertram H, Treptau J, et al. NT- proBNP indicates left ventricular impairment and adverse clinical outcome in patients with tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary regurgitation. Can J Cardiol. (2016) 32:1247–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.013
9. Gursu HA, Varan B, Sade E, Erdogan I, Ozkan M. Analysis of right ventricle function with strain imaging before and after pulmonary valve replacement. Cardiol J. (2016) 23:195–201. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0007
10. Joynt MR, Yu S, Dorfman AL, Ghadimi Mahani M, Agarwal PP, Lu JC. Differential impact of pulmonary regurgitation on patients with surgically repaired pulmonary stenosis versus tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol. (2016) 15:289–94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.025
11. Gorter TM, Van Melle JP, Hillege HL, Pieper PG, Ebels T, Hoendermis ES, et al. Ventricular remodeling after pulmonary valve replacement: comparison between pressure-loaded and volume-loaded right ventricles. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2014) 19:95–101. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu097
12. Buechel ER, Dave HH, Kellenberger CJ, Dodge-Khatami A, Pretre R, Berger F, et al. Remodelling of the right ventricle after early pulmonary valve replacement in children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance Eur Heart J. (2005) 26:2721–7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi581
13. Therrien J, Siu SC, McLaughlin PR, Liu PP, Williams WG, Webb GD. Pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: are we operating too late? J Am Coll Cardiol. (2000) 36:1670–5. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00930-X
14. Bigdelian H, Mardani D, Sedighi M. The effect of pulmonary valve replacement surgery on hemodynamics of patients who underwent repair of tetralogy of Fallot. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. (2015) 7:122–5. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2015.26
15. Hallbergson A, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, Geva T. Right ventricular remodeling after pulmonary valve replacement: early gains, late losses. Ann Thorac Surg. (2015) 99:660–6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.015
16. Dawson AG, Corno AF. Pulmonary valve replacement: what did we learn? Ann Thorac Surg. (2015) 100:2418–9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.076
17. Tang D, Del Nido PJ, Yang C, Zuo H, Huang X, Rathod RH, et al. Patient-specific MRI-based right ventricle models using different zero-load diastole and systole geometries for better cardiac stress and strain calculations and pulmonary valve replacement surgical outcome predictions. PLoS ONE (2016) 11:e0162986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162986
18. Tang D, Yang C, Del Nido PJ, Zuo H, Rathod RH, Huang X, et al. Mechanical stress is associated with right ventricular response to pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 151:687–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.106
19. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, de Groot NMS, de Haan F, Deanfiel JE, Galie N, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J. (2010) 31:2915–57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq249
20. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, Child JS, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2008) 52:e143–e63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.001
21. Geva T. Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. (2011) 13:9–33. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-9
22. Legendre A, Richard R, Pontnau F, Jais JP, Dufour M, Grenier O, et al. Usefulness of maximal oxygen pulse in timing of pulmonary valve replacement in patients with isolated pulmonary regurgitation. Cardiol Young (2016) 26:1310–8. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115002504
23. Alvarez-Fuente M, Garrido-Lestache E, Fernandez- Pineda L, Romera B, Sánchez I, Centella T, et al. Timing of pulmonary valve replacement: how much can the right ventricle dilate before it looses its remodeling potential? Pediatr Cardiol. (2016) 37:601–5. doi: 10.1007/s00246-015-1320-4
24. Greutmann M. Tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary valve replacement, and right ventricular volumes: are we chasing the right target? Eur Heart J. (2016) 37:836–9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv634
25. McElhinney DB, Hellenbrand WE, Zahn EM, Jones TK, Cheatham JP, Lock JE, et al. Short- and medium-term outcomes after transcatheter pulmonary valve placement in the expanded multicenter US Melody valve trial. Circulation (2010) 122:507–16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.921692
26. Gillespie MJ, Rome JJ, Levi DS, Williams RJ, Rhodes JF, Cheatham JP, et al. Melody valve implant within failed bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary position: a multicenter experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2012) 5:862–70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.972216
27. Boudjemline Y, Legendre A, Ladouceur M, Boughenou MF, Patel M, Bonnet D, et al. Branch pulmonary artery jailing with a bare metal stent to anchor a transcatheter pulmonary valve in patients with patched large right ventricular outflow tract. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2012) 5:e22–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968610
28. Malekzadeh-Milani S, Ladouceur M, Cohen S, Iserin L, Boudjemline Y. Results of transcatheter pulmonary valvulation in native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. (2014) 107:592–8. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.07.045
29. Caiazzo A, Guibert R, Boudjemline Y, Vignon-Clementel IE. Blood flow simulations for the design of stented valve reducer in enlarged ventricular outflow tracts. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. (2015) 6:485–500. doi: 10.1007/s13239-015-0240-z
30. Virk SA, Liou K, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S, Cao C. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Int J Cardiol. (2015) 201:487–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.119
31. Jones TK, Rome JJ, Armstrong AK, Berger F, Hellenbrand WE, Cabalka AK, et al. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement reduces tricuspid regurgitation in patients with right ventricular volume/pressure overload. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2016) 68:1525–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.734
32. Beaudoin J, Bédard É, Pibarot P. Fate and management of tricuspid regurgitation following transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2016) 68:1536–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.001
33. Sosnowski C, Matella T, Fogg L, Ilbawi M, Nagaraj H, Kavinsky C, et al. Hybrid pulmonary artery plication followed by transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement: comparison with surgical PVR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2016) 88:804–10. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26620
34. Husain J, Praichasilchai P, Gilbert Y, Qureshi SA, Morgan GJ. Early European experience with the Venus P-valve®: filling the gap in percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Eurointervention (2016) 12:643–51. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I5A105
35. Lindsay I, Aboulhosn J, Salem M, Levi D. Aortic root compression during transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2016) 88:814–21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26547
36. Holzer RJ, Hijazi ZM. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement; state of the art. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2016) 87:117–8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26263
37. Promphan W, Prachasilchai P, Siripornpitak S, Qureshi SA, Layangool T. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation with the Venus P-valve: clinical experience and early results. Cardiol Young (2016) 26:698–710. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115001067
38. Gillespie MJ, Benson LN, Bergersen L, Bacha EA, Cheatham SL, Crean AM, et al. Patient selection process for the Harmony transcatheter pulmonary valve early feasibility study. Am J Cardiol. (2017) 120:1387–92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.034
39. McKenzie ED, Khan MS, Dietzman TW, Guzmán-Pruneda FA, Samayoa AX, Liou A, et al. Surgical pulmonary valve replacement: a benchmark for outcomes comparisons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2014) 148:1450–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.060
40. Shinkawa T, Lu CK, Chipman C, Tang X, Gossett JM, Imamura M. The midterm outcomes of bioprosthetic pulmonary valve replacement in children. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2015) 27:310–8. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.07.010
41. Mitchell MB. Pulmonary valve replacement for congenital heart disease: what valve substitute should we be using? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 152:1230–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.031
42. Nomoto R, Sleeper LA, Borisuk MJ, Bergerson L, Pigula FA, Emani S, et al. Outcome and performance of bioprosthetic pulmonary valve replacement in patients with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 152:1333–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.064
43. Halvorsen F, Haller C, Hickey E. Pulmonary valve replacement in older children using stented bioprostheses. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. (2016) 2016:mmw003. doi: 10.1093/mmcts/mmw003
44. Li WF, Pollard H, Karimi M, Asnes JD, Hellenbrand WE, Shabanova V, et al. Comparison of valvar and right ventricular function following transcatheter and surgical pulmonary valve replacement. Congenit Heart Dis. (2018) 13:140–6. doi: 10.1111/chd.12544
45. Troost E, Meyns B, Daenen W, Van de werf F, Gewillig M, Van Deyk K, et al. Homograft survival after tetralogy of Fallot repair: determinants of accelerated homograft degeneration. Eur Heart J. (2007) 28:2503–9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm376
46. Chen PC, Sager MS, Zurakowski D, Pigula FA, Baird CW, Mayer JE Jr, et al. Younger age and valve oversizing are predictors of structural valve deterioration after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2012) 143:352–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.079
47. Batlivala SP, Emani S, Mayer JE, McElhinney DB. Pulmonary valve replacement function in adolescents: a comparison of bioprosthetic valves and homograft conduits. Ann Thorac Surg. (2012) 93:2007–16. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.039
48. Abbas JR, Hoschtitzky JA. Which is the best tissue valve used in the pulmonary position, late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot? Interactive Cardio-Vasc Thorac Surg. (2013) 17:854–60. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt332
49. Abbas JR, Hoschtitzky JA. Is there a role for mechanical valve prostheses in pulmonary valve replacement late after tetralogy of Fallot repair? Interactive Cardio-Vasc Thorac Surg. (2014) 18:661–6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt541
50. Mosca RS. Pulmonary valve replacement after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: evolving strategies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 151:623–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.008
51. Gulack BC, Benrashid E, Jaquiss RDB, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement with a Trifecta valve is associated with reduced transvalvular gradient. Ann Thorac Surg. (2017) 103:655–62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.018
52. Corno AF, Dawson AG, Bolger AP. Trifecta St. Jude medical® aortic valve in pulmonary position. Nano Reviews Exp. (2017) 8:1–7. doi: 10.1080/20022727.2017.1299900
53. Poinot N, Fils JF, Demanet H, Dessy H, Biarent D, Wauthy P, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with homograft versus Contegra: a case control comparison of mortality and morbidity. J Cardiothoracic Surg. (2018) 13:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0698-5
54. Quail MA, Frigiola A, Giardini A, Muthurangu V, Hughes M, Lurz P, et al. Impact of pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary regurgitation: a comparison of intervention and non-intervention. Ann Thorac Surg. (2012) 94:1619–26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.06.062
55. Del Nido PJ. Surgical management of right ventricular dysfunction late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: right ventricular remodeling surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. (2006) 9:29–34. doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2006.02.007
56. Ghez O, Tsang VT, Frigiola A, Coats L, Taylor A, Van Doorn C, et al. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction for pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Preliminary results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2007) 31:654–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.031
57. Geva T, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, Cecchin F, Rhodes J, Geva J, et al. Randomised trial of pulmonary valve replacement with and without right ventricular remodeling surgery. Circulation (2010) 122:S201–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.951178
58. Corno AF, Qanadli SD, Sekarski N, Artemisia S, Hurni M, Tozzi P, et al. Bovine valved xenograft in pulmonary position: medium-term follow-up with excellent hemodynamics and freedom from calcification. Ann Thorac Surg. (2004) 78:1382–8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.095
59. Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Saliba Z, Merckx J, Aggoun Y, Bonnet D, et al. Percutaneous replacement of pulmonary valve in a right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit with valve dysfunction. Lancet (2000) 356:1403–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02844-0
60. Zhou JQ, Corno AF, Huber CH, Tozzi P, von Segesser LK. Self-expandable valved stent of large size: off-bypass implantation in pulmonary position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2003) 24:212–6. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00178-7
61. Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Qureshi SA, Le Bidois J, Iserin L, Acar P, et al. Percutaneous insertion of the pulmonary valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2002) 39:1664–9. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01822-3
62. Cabalka AK, Asnes JD, Balzer DT, Cheatham JP, Gillespie MJ, Jones TK, et al. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the melody valve for treatment of dysfunctional surgical bioprostheses: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2017)
63. Torres AJ. Pre-stenting and melody valve stent fracture: when more is less. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2017) 10:1760–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.008
64. Boudjemline Y. A new one-step procedure for pulmonary valve implantation of the Melody valve: simultaneous pre-stenting and valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2018) 91:64–70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27332
65. Trezzi M, Bandisole VM, Kavarana MN, Bradley SM. Surgical technique for placement of the melody valve in a dilated right ventricular outflow tract. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2018) 155:739–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.082
66. Si MS. Open melody implant in a vascular graft: an alternative to the bioprosthetic valve? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2018) 155:742–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.040
67. Honjo O, Luo S. For a better landing. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2018) 155:744–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.110
Keywords: congenital heart defects, pulmonary valve regurgitation, pulmonary valve implantation, percutaneous invitation, pulmonary artery
Citation: Corno AF (2018) Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation: Neither Interventional Nor Surgery Fits All. Front. Pediatr. 6:169. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00169
Received: 14 March 2018; Accepted: 22 May 2018;
Published: 07 June 2018.
Edited by:
Giovanni Biglino, University of Bristol, United KingdomReviewed by:
Yogen Singh, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United KingdomElena Giulia Milano, University of Verona, Italy
Copyright © 2018 Corno. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Antonio F. Corno, afc10@leicester.ac.uk