Clinical presentation of pediatric patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center in Mexico City

Introduction

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 is broad, from asymptomatic cases to severe cases and death. Since the beginning of the pandemic, reports in the literature informed that children have a milder presentation and lower rates of hospitalization compared to adults. Severe cases and deaths are scarce (1).

Mexico is one of the countries most affected by the pandemic, according to data from the Ministry of Health as of 30 June 2022, 5.99 million cases had accumulated, with 326,000 deaths. In children (<18 years), 378,043 cases had been reported, 54.9% of them in adolescents who were 12–17 years old. A total of 1,276 deaths had been informed with a mortality rate of 0.33% (2).

The Directorate-General for Epidemiology established guidelines for epidemiological surveillance of viral respiratory disease (VRD). From the beginning and during the pandemic, the guidelines were modified to include COVID-19 cases. The definition of a suspected case is any person of any age who in the last 10 days has had one of the following signs and symptoms: cough, dyspnea, fever, or headache (in children under 5 years of age may be replaced by irritability) accompanied by at least one of the following: myalgias, arthralgias, sore throat, chills, chest pain, rhinorrhea, polypnea, anosmia, dysgeusia, and conjunctivitis. The process for notification to the National Epidemiological Surveillance System was established through the Electronic Platform for Epidemiological Surveillance System for Respiratory Diseases (SISVER for its acronym in Spanish) (3).

Given that there are few clinical-epidemiological publications that describe pediatric patients with COVID-19 in Mexico, the objective of this study is to analyze the clinical course of patients with confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and to describe patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) attended during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in a third-level pediatric hospital in Mexico City.

Materials and methods

Patient cohort

A prospective study was conducted at the Pediatric Hospital, National Medical Center XXI Century, a tertiary care level hospital of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS). During the pandemic, it was one of the three pediatric hospitals in Mexico City designated to provide care for COVID-19 patients. Before the conversion, the hospital had 184 beds and two intensive care units (neonatal and pediatric). With the emergency, a special in-patient unit with 6 beds and one area with 40 beds were enabled to receive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Any patient classified as a suspected case of COVID-19, regardless of the health insurance status, was evaluated at the emergency department. The period of study was from 21 March 2020 to 13 January 2021.

Patients were included if met the operational definition of suspected VRD in accordance with the standardized guidelines for epidemiological and laboratory surveillance or were suspected cases of COVID-19 without respiratory symptoms. In both cases, only confirmed COVID-19 patients were analyzed, and no patient was excluded. The epidemiological and demographic data were provided by the primary caregiver, and a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal sample was taken for a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test (rRT-PCR). According to the definitions of the guidelines and the test results, the patients were classified as follows:

(a) Negative case of COVID-19: a suspected case of VRD with a negative rRT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. (b) Positive case of COVID-19: a suspected case of VRD with a positive rRT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.

Also, patients referred from other hospitals with a positive rRT-PCR test were admitted directly to COVID units.

Epidemiological and demographic data were collected in the surveillance formats. Clinical records of hospitalized patients were reviewed for demographic information, underlying diseases, signs, and symptoms of infection, duration of disease, clinical course, and outcome.

Disease severity was classified as follows: (a) mild, in case of the presence of fever and/or asthenia and/or symptoms compatible with the upper respiratory infection without respiratory distress and/or instrumental evidence of pneumonia; (b) moderate, in the presence of respiratory distress and/or reduced nutrition and hydration and/or instrumental evidence of pneumonia; (c) severe, in the presence of severe respiratory distress and/or desaturation (SpO2 < 92% in ambient air) and/or intermittent cyanosis or apnea and/or systemic symptoms such as lethargy, dehydration, convulsions or suspected sepsis; and (d) critical, if acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure (MOF), septic shock, or coma occurs (4).

Also, patients were evaluated and classified as cases of MIS-C associated with COVID-19 according to the definition by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5): an individual aged <21 years presenting with fever (>38.0°C for ≥24 h, or report of subjective fever lasting ≥24 h), laboratory evidence of inflammation [one or more of the following: an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, procalcitonin, D-dimer, ferritin, lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), or interleukin 6 (IL-6), elevated neutrophils, reduced lymphocytes and low albumin], and evidence of clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization, with multisystem (>2) organ involvement (cardiac, renal, respiratory, hematologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, or neurological); and no alternative plausible diagnoses; and positive for current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection by rRT-PCR, serology, or antigen test; or COVID-19 exposure within 4 weeks prior to the onset of symptoms.

Follow-up of ambulatory patients was done daily by the hospital epidemiology staff by telephone calls, seeking for signs of alarm (fever >38.5 for more than 72 h, fast breathing, chest wall indrawing, inability to feed, or cyanosis) until resolution of signs and symptoms of the disease.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pediatric Hospital and conducted in agreement with the ethical principles.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages, and numerical data as the median and interquartile range (IQR) or minimum and maximum values, since they did not show normal distribution. Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare characteristics between groups. A logistic regression model was constructed to identify clinical or laboratory characteristics that differentiated patients with critical conditions from those with moderate and severe disease. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the analyses were performed with SPSS version 24.

Results

From 21 March 2020 to 13 January 2021, 697 patients with a median age of 8 years (1 day to 17 years) underwent rRT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing (nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal sample). Gender distribution demonstrated male predominance with 385 patients (55.2%). Most were inhabitants of the Mexico City (n = 503, 72.1%), followed by the State of Mexico (n = 62, 8.8%), states of Morelos (n = 25, 3.5%), Chiapas (n = 19, 2.7%), and Guerrero (n = 19, 2.7%).

A total of one hundred eighty-one patients (26%) had a positive rRT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test and 516 (74%) patients had a negative result. The frequency of positive cases was higher in the >12 year’s group with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) in comparison with other age groups (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Age group and clinical characteristic of patients with a positive and negative RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test.

Figure 1 describes the frequency of suspected cases with a symptomatic infection who were treated during the study period; as shown, the highest number of cases and positivity rate were in May and December 2020.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 positive cases and positivity rate from 21 March 2020, to 13 January 2021, Pediatric Hospital National Medical Center, Mexico City.

Table 1 compares the age and symptoms of patients with rRT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative tests. Fever was the most common clinical manifestation, and headache/irritability, cough, sore throat, vomiting, anosmia, and dysgeusia more frequent among positive patients, which was statistically significant.

SARS-CoV-2 positive cases

Of the 181 patients, 121 (66.8%) had a mild disease and were treated as outpatients, while 60 patients (33.1%) with a moderate, severe, or critical disease were hospitalized; 48/121 (26.5%) had epidemiological contact with a suspected or confirmed case. Of the outpatients, the median age was 10 years (range 2 months to 17 years); 66 were males (54.5%); 26/121 had some comorbidity (21.4%). The main comorbidities were lung/asthma disease in six patients (4.9%), cancer in 6 patients (4.9%), and overweight in 5 (4.1%).

Table 2 shows that the most common symptoms globally reported were fever, headache or irritability, cough, and sore throat. However, inpatients had a statistically significant higher frequency of fever, general malaise, dyspnea, chills, polypnea, and cyanosis in comparison with outpatients. Having sore throat and rhinorrhea were more frequent in outpatients.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Clinical characteristics in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Of the 60 inpatients, the median age was 9 years; 38 were males (64.4%); 49/60 patients had one or more comorbidities (81.6%) in comparison with outpatients (21.4%), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The main comorbidities were cancer in 25 patients (41.6%), followed by overweight in 9 patients (15%). A total of ten patients (16.6%) reported epidemiological contact with a suspected or confirmed case. The median hospital stay was 9 days.

Inpatients’ clinical presentation and management

Of the 60 patients, 27 (45%) had a moderate illness, 16 (26.6%) had a severe illness, and 17 (28.3%) critical illness. Patients with severe and critical illnesses received intensive care. All critically ill patients except 2 had an underlying disease; 100% required mechanical ventilation support (median 4 days, range 1–22 days), 15 vasopressor support, 5 low-molecular-weight heparin, and 4 intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

A total of thirty-one patients (16 with severe illness and 15 with moderate illness) received supplemental oxygen (including low-flow nasal cannula or face mask, high-flow nasal cannula, or non-invasive ventilation). All patients with supplemental oxygen received corticosteroids (48/60, 80%).

A total of fifteen critically ill patients received antimicrobial treatment due to a diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia or bacterial sepsis at admission (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, or cefepime), 11 cancer patients received piperacillin/tazobactam for an episode of fever and neutropenia, and 6 patients received antivirals during the first months of the pandemic (oseltamivir, acyclovir, and lopinavir/ritonavir). Three patients received cefotaxime plus metronidazole as they were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Six patients had a healthcare-associated infection (ventilation-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and surgical site infection). Overall, 68.3% of the patients received antimicrobials during their hospital stay.

A total of six patients met the criteria for MIS-C. The median age was 9 years 5 months, and 3 of them had obesity. Four had a positive rRT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection, one had a confirmed household contact (mother), and one had a positive serology (IgG). The cardiac evaluation was normal in 4 patients; one patient had myocarditis (who also presented arrhythmia); and one pericardial effusion. All patients received IVIG and corticosteroids. One patient received a second dose of IVIG due to the persistence of fever and inflammation parameters (CRP and D-dimer). A total of four patients required supplemental oxygen and vasopressor support, and only one mechanical ventilation support. None of the six MIS-C patients died.

Laboratory and imaging studies

Table 3 compares data from laboratory tests at admission between critically ill patients (n = 17) and those with moderate and severe disease (n = 43). As shown, the levels of hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelet counts were somewhat similar between the two groups.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Comparison of laboratory data between critically ill patients and the group with moderate-severe COVID-19.

While CRP (median 29.2 vs. 25.3 mg/L), procalcitonin (median 0.80 vs. 0.34 ng/ml), and D-dimer (median 693 vs. 552 ng/ml) values were higher in the critical condition group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The ferritin values were lower in the critically ill group (median 878.5 vs. 1,131 ng/ml), although only 36/60 patients had a result for this biomarker.

The laboratory results for the MIS-C patients showed a median hemoglobin value of 10 g/dl (IQR 9.4–14), leukocytes/mm³ median value 16,020 (IQR 7,367–26,005), neutrophils/mm³ median value 13,960 (IQR 6,090–233,375), lymphocytes/mm³ median value 955 (IQR 525–1,155), and platelets/mm³ median value 100,000 (IQR 46,500–261,000). A total of three patients presented acute renal injury with a median creatinine value of 1 mg/dl (IQR 0.57–4.41). All had elevated CRP levels, median 226 mg/L (IQR 122.5–361), and hypoalbuminemia, with a median albumin value of 2.2 g/L (IQR 1.84–2.46). Elevated D-dimer levels were observed with a median of 2,447 ng/ml (IQR 891–5,872) and fibrinogen values with a median of 138 mg/dl (IQR 363–577). Only three patients had ferritin reports with a median of 761 ng/ml (minimum 481 and maximum 761).

At admission, all hospitalized patients had a chest X-ray taken and in 13 it was reported as normal. The alterations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection were bilateral interstitial infiltrates, micro and/or macronodular reticular infiltrates, pulmonary nodules, ground-glass opacities, air bronchogram, and crazy-paving pattern. Other abnormalities corresponded to the underlying disease or condition (cardiomegaly, pulmonary hypertension, lung metastases, pulmonary overdistention, and lymphadenopathy). Table 4 compares the radiological findings in detail according to the severity of COVID-19. Patients with alterations associated with the SARS-CoV-2 infection in chest X-rays had a higher risk of having a severe and critical illness in comparison with a normal study (40.7 vs. 6%), p = 0.001.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Radiologic findings in 60 hospitalized patients according to clinical severity of COVID-19.

A total of eight patients underwent CT scans, five reported images of bilateral ground-glass opacities, and areas of consolidation in two. In the remaining three, CT was requested for the underlying disease and no alterations secondary to the SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported.

Unusual presentations

A total of five patients (8.3%) had an elevation of pancreatic enzymes three times the normal value, one was confirmed with Balthazar B pancreatitis by abdominal tomography, and in the rest, the imaging studies were inconclusive.

A total of four patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, three presented with acute abdomen, two were diagnosed with stage 4 appendicitis, and one with stage 1 appendicitis. The fourth patient had non-Hodgkin lymphoma and surgery was performed as part of the diagnostic approach.

A total of two infants (3.3%), 6 and 12 months of age, presented with encephalitis, one of them with a fatal outcome.

There was one obese patient with metabolic syndrome (1.6%) who presented with a thrombotic event at the hospital. At first, SARS-CoV-2 infection was not suspected. He denied previous respiratory or any infection symptoms. CT-angiography reported thrombosis of the popliteal artery and anterior and posterior tibial arteries, as well as popliteal vein thrombophlebitis. He received treatment with anticoagulants without improvement, so a supracondylar amputation was performed.

Outcome

In the follow-up telephone calls, the staff collected information on the symptoms and overall status. None of the patients returned to the emergency department due to the worsening of the disease. Patients reported rapid improvement in a few days (3–5 days) and all of them recovered on the 10th day after the positive rRT-PCR test.

Table 5 shows the logistic regression model of clinical characteristics associated with a critical illness. Two variables were statistically significant: patients who developed pneumonia had a higher risk of critical condition (OR 9.879; 95% CI, 1.520–64.196), while older age was associated with a better prognosis (OR 0.987; 95% CI, 0.972–1.001). Abnormal chest radiograph findings had a high OR (9.071; 95% CI, 0.862–102.641); however, this was not statistically significant. Furthermore, in the logistic regression model, no laboratory data were associated with a critical COVID-19.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Logistic regression analysis to determine factors associated to critical illness in hospitalized pediatric patients with COVID-19.

A total of 13 patients died (mortality 7.1%). All classified as having critical illness and requiring mechanical ventilation support. The median hospital stay of these patients was 12 days. All but one had comorbidities: four had cancer, four congenital heart disease, one chronic kidney disease and epilepsy, one Epstein–Barr virus-induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, one obesity, and one diabetes mellitus. In 84.6% of the lethal cases, SARS-CoV-2 infection was among the conditions leading to the immediate cause of death. Table 6 enlists the causes and conditions leading to the fatal outcome.

TABLE 6

Table 6. Cause-of-death according to the official certificate in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Discussion

The behavior of a new virus cannot be anticipated until the first reports of the disease appear. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, it seemed that in the pediatric population, SARS-CoV-2 infection had a milder course, with fewer hospitalizations and low mortality compared to adults. In children, household contacts were the main source of contagion (6) also. It was assumed that, like other respiratory viruses, children would be responsible to maintain the chain of transmission in the community due to a higher rate of viral excretion and a greater number of asymptomatic cases (1). The estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infection were imprecise because children were not routinely evaluated. In a large series in China, infection was reported in 2.2% of the studied patients (7); in the United States, a retrospective cohort including 135,794 patients younger than 25 years, from 1 January through 8 September 2020, 4% were infected (8). In Mexico, a rate of 6.3% was reported in patients younger than 18 years until 26 June 2022 (2).

Of the total number of patients evaluated in this study, 181 (26%) had a positive rRT-PCR test. The percentage of positivity varied over time as the pandemic evolved in Mexico City. The demographic data coincide with the systematic review and meta-analysis by Liu et al. reporting 29 studies published from 12 December 2019 to 10 May 2020, including 4,300 children, with a higher proportion of cases in males, and scholars and adolescents (9). In another systematic review by Patel that included 2,832 patients from January to April 2020, COVID-19 was also reported more frequently in male patients 56.4% (10). In this study, percentage of the male gender was higher in hospitalized patients (64.4%), although it did not reach a statistically significant difference.

There are no distinctive clinical presentations of COVID-19 in children. The most common symptoms of positive cases in order of frequency were fever, headache or irritability, and cough, which is consistent with various publications (1, 8–10). These last two symptoms plus sore throat, dysgeusia, and anosmia were associated with having a positive result. Even though, dysgeusia and anosmia were referred in less than 6% of the cases. The symptoms associated with hospitalization were general malaise, dyspnea, chills, polypnea, and cyanosis. The clinical spectrum is broad but other symptoms occur less frequently, some less than 20% and there are few studies evaluating combinations of symptoms (11). Other authors had emphasized the presence of gastrointestinal signs and symptoms, but in our patients, abdominal pain and diarrhea presented with similar frequency in positive and negative cases. Gastrointestinal disorders include patients with acute appendicitis. In a study reporting acute abdomen and appendicitis in 1,010 pediatric patients with COVID-19 or MIS-C from Latin America, 38 children (3.8%) underwent abdominal surgery due to suspected appendicitis, 34 of them (89.7%) had an intraoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis, and four of them had non-surgical findings (12). In this small cohort, three patients were confirmed with acute appendicitis. A retrospective cohort of 12,306 pediatric COVID-19 patients in the United States found a broad spectrum of non-specific symptoms across the age groups. Only 25.1% of the children had at least one of the typical symptoms (fever, cough, or shortness of breath), and 74.9% of the children did not have any of the typical COVID-19 symptoms (13).

According to the evidence in 15 contact-tracing studies (14), children and adolescents seem to have a lower susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection than adults, with a pooled OR of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37–0.85). Some reports have informed a high frequency of contact with a confirmed or suspected case of SARS-CoV-2 infection (11). In this cohort, the frequency was less than 30%. This low rate may have different explanations. COVID-19 increased the stigma against people suspected to have contact with COVID-19 patients (15). In the case of pediatric patients, parents were informed that children needed to be isolated, and visits would be restricted. Few were willing to accept this condition, so, they omitted contact information. Also, as most of the children had comorbidities, they continued visiting hospitals and clinics for medical attention, increasing the risk of exposition to SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high levels of community transmission.

Mild presentation of the disease (67%) and recognized alarm signs facilitated the follow-up program for ambulatory patients. As we did not continue the follow-up for a longer period, we lost the opportunity to identify patients with new or persistent symptoms or long-COVID cases. This entity, well recognized in adults, has been difficult to ascertain in children. In the meta-analysis by Behnood et al., there was a lack of a clear case definition, so the real prevalence of post-COVID-19 syndrome was not reported. Also, the primary analysis of controlled studies found that the frequency of the majority of reported persistent symptoms was similar in SARS-CoV-2 positive cases and controls (16). Workload and increasing acute cases demanding attention, as well as limited resources make it difficult to assess the long-term behavior in mild cases of COVID-19 in pediatric patients.

Published studies show that the immune response of children and adults to mild SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar but differs in severe diseases (17). The association of severe COVID-19 in children and adults with pre-existing medical conditions emphasizes the contributions of these comorbidities. The Pediatric Hospital is a tertiary care level specialty center and was one of the three pediatric hospitals designated to treat COVID-19 pediatric patients in Mexico City. Even though the hospital is for social security patients, during the pandemic any patient requesting care was received. In several studies, patients requiring hospitalization had a high frequency of comorbidities comparable to the report by Bustos-Cordova et al. from another tertiary care-level pediatric hospital in Mexico City—of the 50 patients with COVID-19, 52% had a previous medical condition (18). In a case series report from a second-level public hospital in Sinaloa, Mexico, during the first months of the pandemic (March–May 2020), only 10/51 confirmed cases were hospitalized, 50% had comorbidities, and one patient died (19). In our cohort, 81.6% of the inpatients had at least one comorbidity, higher than other reports. In the multicenter retrospective study of 1,063 children from 10 different Latin American countries, including Mexico, the presence of any comorbidity was associated with hospitalization (OR 5.3; 95% CI, 3.10–9.15), and the factors associated with ICU admission were residing in a rural area, metabolic or endocrine disorder, immune deficiency, and preterm birth (20). In contrast, in the present study, we could not verify that comorbidities were associated with critical illness, probably because 80% of the 60 hospitalized patients had an underlying disease. However, we determined that patients who developed pneumonia are at increased risk of a critical condition.

WHO’s interim guidance on the clinical management of COVID-19 published in May 2020 incorporates antibiotic stewardship principles with specific recommendations (21). The guidance does not recommend antibiotic therapy unless signs and symptoms of a bacterial infection exist, based on host factors and local epidemiology, along with daily assessments for de-escalation. At the beginning of the pandemic, little knowledge about the disease and a clinical presentation as severe pneumonia with elevated inflammatory biomarkers, led to an increase in antimicrobial use. Also, critical patients, with multiple invasive procedures and suboptimal practices of infection control and prevention, were associated with an increase in healthcare-associated infections. In our cohort, cancer patients with an episode of febrile neutropenia and COVID-19 received antimicrobial treatment according to the current guidelines. Also, 15/20 critical patients were suspected to have a bacterial infection, along with the patients with acute appendicitis and healthcare-associated infections, accounting for 68% of patients receiving at least one antibiotic. The use of antivirals occurred only in the first 4 months of the pandemic when scarce information was available. In comparison, in the systematic review that included 141 articles from 28 different countries, and 28,093 patients combined, 58.7% received antibiotics. In children it was 57% and in adults with comorbidity 74%. Most articles did not report bacterial coinfection, and more than 40 different antimicrobials were used to manage patients with COVID-19 disease (22). In a report from five Latin American countries (23), including 990 children with COVID-19 and MIS-C, the antibiotic prescription was 24.5%. The authors found that the rate of antibiotic prescriptions was significantly higher in children with MIS-C as well as those requiring respiratory support. Those with radiologic evidence of pneumonia/ARDS and those with fever, and the need for admission to the hospital were associated with a higher rate of antibiotic prescription. In our cohort, none of the ambulatory patients received antibiotics. If we consider a total of 181 patients with a positive rRT-PCR test, the antibiotic use was similar (22.6%).

In the Mexican population, the risk of death by age group and according to the presence of comorbidities has been analyzed in COVID-19 cases between 22 February 2020 and 18 April 2021. There were 52,432 total cases in Mexico and 52 deaths in the population group of those younger than 20 years in Mexico City. For the pediatric group, the case-fatality rate was below 0.3% (24), and the highest lethality was found in children <1 year with any comorbidity (5.8%). In our study, older patients had a lower risk of critical disease. This was similar to the findings of a retrospective cohort of 86 patients in another pediatric hospital in Mexico City, from 1 April to 28 September 2020, with four (5%) deaths: one previously healthy, two obese, and one a bone marrow transplant patient (25). In this report, mortality was greater (7.1%), and in most cases, SARS-CoV-2 infection was the condition leading to the cause of death. In the United States, COVID-NET reported, among 3,116 hospitalized children and adolescents with COVID-19 from 1 March 2020 to 19 June 2021, that only 21 (0.7%) died. And later, from 20 June to 31 July 2021, during the predominance of the delta variant, the mortality was higher, among 164 patients, three patients died (1.8%), but the difference between both periods was not statistically significant (26).

It is noteworthy that the hospital mortality reported here is higher than the national data, both for Mexico and the United States. This difference is most likely due to selection bias; pediatric patients in hospitals specifically dedicated to COVID-19 are likely to see more severe cases. Many of the patients were previously attended to our institution and most of them had more than one comorbidity. Of the 13 deaths, only one patient was without comorbidity and was 1 year old—a consistent risk factor in several studies (24, 26, 27). Very low mortality of 0.5% was reported in Argentina during the first year of the pandemic (28). In Brazil, in an analysis carried out approximately in the same period as the present study, the hospital mortality of pediatric patients was 7.6%, observing that there was a higher risk in children under 2 years of age, indigenous, and with some comorbidity (29). In a cohort of 557 severe and critical COVID-19 pediatric patients from North America, Latin America, and Europe, the overall hospital mortality was 10%, but 15% in children <2 years (OR 1.89; 95% CI, 1.05–3.39); 50% of the patients had comorbidity and 83% received antibiotics. Those with MIS-C had a lower mortality risk (OR 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11–0.64) (26) in contrast with other reviews from Latin America that found an overall case fatality ratio of 4% in 592 MIS-C cases (30). In a systematic review and meta-analysis that included 83 studies, 57 (21,549 patients) in the meta-analysis (of which 22 provided individual patient data) and 26 studies in the narrative synthesis, the authors found that hospitalized children and young people at the greatest vulnerability to severe disease or death with SARS-CoV-2 infection are infants, teenagers, those with cardiac or neurological conditions, or 2 or more comorbid conditions, and those who are significantly obese (31). In most of the reports from Latin America, these risk factors are common conditions.

This study has several limitations. The information on the outpatients is restricted to the data collected in the epidemiological report, and not all the comorbidities were registered as one option is “other” without specifying the disease. The follow-up of this group was finalized on the 10th day, so we could not assess the persistence of symptoms.

Inflammation biomarkers were not available for all the inpatients at admission; therefore, we could not determine if they could be considered prognostic factors. Chest CT was available for a limited number of patients, so we only compared findings in the chest X-rays. Lastly, the diverse comorbidities altered many of the laboratory values and imaging studies, making the comparison even more difficult.

Conclusion

In this study, hospitalized COVID-19 pediatric patients had high mortality. Despite 2 years having passed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the epidemiological and clinical data on children are still helpful to improve their prognosis.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, upon reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Local Ethics and Research Committee of the Pediatric Hospital Number 3603. Written informed consent from the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

RA-N, MV-K, and GM-N: study design, manuscript preparation, and final approval. RA-N, JZ-C, GV-R, RA-F, CG-G, VM-L, MS-A, DP-R, EF-R, and MV-K: collection and analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the front-line healthcare workers at our institution.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer EB declared a shared parent affiliation with the author JZ-C to the handling editor at the time of the review.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Li B, Zhang S, Zhang R, Chen X, Wang Y, Zhu C. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:591132. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.591132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Secretaría de Salud. Datos Abiertos COVID-19. (2022). Available online at: https://datos.gob.mx/busca/dataset?tags=covid-19 (accessed June 30, 2022).

Google Scholar

3. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Lineamiento Estandarizado de la Vigilancia Epidemiológica y por Laboratorio de la Enfermedad Respiratoria Viral. (2021). Available online at: https://coronavirus.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Lineamiento_VE_y_Lab_Enf_Viral_Ene-2021_290121.pdf (accessed November 30, 2021).

Google Scholar

4. Esposito S, Marchetti F, Lanari M, Caramelli F, De Fanti A, Vergine G, et al. COVID-19 management in the pediatric age: consensus document of the COVID-19 working group in paediatrics of the Emilia-Romagna region (RE-CO-Ped), Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:3919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). (2022). Available online at: https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2020/han00432.asp (accessed May 4, 2022).

Google Scholar

6. Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Pediatrics. (2020) 145:1–10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. (2020) 323:1239–42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bailey LC, Razzaghi H, Burrows EK, Bunnell HT, Camacho PEF, Christakis DA, et al. Assessment of 135,794 pediatric patients tested for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 across the United States. JAMA Pediatr. (2021) 175:176–84. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Liu C, He Y, Liu L, Li F, Shi Y. Children with COVID-19 behaving milder may challenge the public policies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. (2020) 20:410. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02316-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Patel NA. Pediatric COVID-19: systematic review of the literature. Am J Otolaryngol. (2020) 41:102573. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ma X, Liu S, Chen L, Zhuang L, Zhang J, Xin Y. The clinical characteristics of pediatric inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:234–40. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Yock-Corrales A, Lenzi J, Ulloa-Gutiérrez R, Gómez-Vargas J, Antúnez-Montes OY, Rios Aida JA, et al. Acute abdomen and appendicitis in 1010 pediatric patients with COVID-19 or MIS-C: a multinational experience from Latin America. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2021) 40:e364–9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Parcha V, Booker KS, Kalra R, Kuranz S, Berra L, Arora G, et al. A retrospective cohort study of 12,306 pediatric COVID-19 patients in the United States. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:10231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89553-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Viner RM, Ward JL, Hudson LD, Ashe M, Patel SV, Hargreaves D, et al. Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection among children and adolescents compared with adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. (2021) 175:143–56. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Fekadu G, Bekele F, Tolossa T, Fetensa G, Turi E, Getachew M, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on chronic diseases care follow-up and current perspectives in low resource settings: a narrative review. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. (2021) 13:86–93.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

16. Behnood SA, Shafran R, Bennett SD, Zhang AXD, O’Mahoney LL, Stephenson TJ, et al. Persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst children and young people: a meta-analysis of controlled and uncontrolled studies. J Infect. (2022) 84:158–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chou J, Thomas PG, Randolph AG. Immunology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:177–85. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01123-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Bustos-Cordova E, Castillo-Garcia D, Ceron-Rodriguez M, Soler-Quinones N. Clinical spectrum of COVID-19 in a mexican pediatric population. Indian Pediatr. (2021) 58:126–8. doi: 10.1007/s13312-021-2126-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pérez-Gaxiola G, Flores-Rocha R, Valadez-Vidarte JC, Hernández-Alcaraz M, Herrera-Mendoza G, Real-Lugo MA. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of children with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a case series in Sinaloa. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. (2021) 78:18–23. doi: 10.24875/BMHIM.200002021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. López-Medina E, Camacho-Moreno G, Brizuela ME, Dávalos DM, Torres JP, Ulloa-Gutierrez R. Factors associated with hospitalization or intensive care admission in children with COVID-19 in Latin America. Front Pediatr. (2022) 10:868297. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.868297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Getahun H, Smith I, Trivedi K, Paulin S, Balkhy HH. Tackling antimicrobial resistance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Bull World Health Organ. (2020) 98:442–442A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.268573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Al-Hadidi SH, Alhussain H, Abdel Hadi H, Johar A, Yassine HM, Al Thani AA, et al. The spectrum of antibiotic prescribing during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review. Microb Drug Resist. (2021) 27:1705–25. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Yock-Corrales A, Lenzi J, Ulloa-Gutiérrez R, Gómez-Vargas J, Antúnez-Montes OY, Rios Aida JA, et al. High rates of antibiotic prescriptions in children with COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome: a multinational experience in 990 cases from Latin America. Acta Paediatr. (2021) 110:1902–10. doi: 10.1111/apa.15847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. González-García N, Castilla-Peón MF, Solórzano Santos F, Jiménez-Juárez RN, Martínez Bustamante ME, Minero Hibert MA, et al. COVID-19 incidence and mortality by age strata and comorbidities in Mexico City: a focus in the pediatric population. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:738423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.738423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Macias-Parra M, Fortes-Gutierrez S, Aguilar-Gomez N, Diaz-Garcia L, Otero-Mendoza F, Arias de la Garza E, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of paediatric patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital in Mexico City. J Trop Pediatr. (2021) 67:fmab025. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Delahoy MJ, Ujamaa D, Whitaker M, O’Halloran A, Anglin O, Burns E, et al. Hospitalizations associated with COVID-19 among children and adolescents — COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1, 2020–August 14, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2021) 70:1255–60. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7036e2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gonzalez-Dambrauskas S, Vasquez-Hoyos P, Camporesi A, Cantillano EM, Dallefeld S, Dominguez-Rojas J, et al. Pediatric critical COVID-19 and mortality in a multinational cohort. medRxiv [Preprint]. (2021):2021.08.20.21262122. doi: 10.1101/2021.08.20.21262122

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gentile A, Juárez MV, Romero Bollón L, Cancellara AD, Pasinovich M, Brizuela M, et al. A multicenter study of confirmed COVID-19 cases: preliminary data of 2690 pediatric patients in Argentina during the first year of the pandemic. Arch Argent Pediatr. (2022) 120:80–8. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022.eng.80

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Oliveira EA, Colosimo EA, Simões E Silva AC, Mak RH, Martelli DB, Silva LR, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for death among hospitalised children and adolescents with COVID-19 in Brazil: an analysis of a nationwide database. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2021) 5:559–68. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00134-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ruvinsky S, Voto C, Roel M, Fustiñana A, Veliz N, Brizuela M, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome temporally related to COVID-19 in children from Latin America and the Caribbean region: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of data from regional surveillance systems. Front Pediatr. (2022) 10:881765. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.881765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Harwood R, Yan H, Talawila Da Camara N, Smith C, Ward J, Tudur-Smith C, et al. Which children and young people are at higher risk of severe disease and death after hospitalisation with SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and young people: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. (2022) 44:101287. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101287

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar