ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 12 May 2020

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00671

Metabolomic Analysis Identifies Glycometabolism Pathways as Potential Targets of Qianggan Extract in Hyperglycemia Rats

  • 1. Institute of Digestive Diseases, China-Canada Center of Research for Digestive Diseases (ccCRDD), Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • 2. School of Public Health, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • 3. Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Qianggan formula, a designed prescription according to the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) theory, is widely used in treating chronic liver diseases, and indicated to prevent blood glucose increase in patients via unknown mechanisms. To unravel the effects and underlying mechanisms of Qianggan formula on hyperglycemia, we administrated Qianggan extract to high fat and high sucrose (HFHS) diet rats. Results showed that four-week Qianggan extract intervention significantly decreased serum fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and liver glycogen levels. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) approach was employed to explore metabolomic profiles in liver and fecal samples. By multivariate and univariate statistical analysis (variable importance of projection value > 1 and p value < 0.05), 44 metabolites (18 in liver and 30 in feces) were identified as significantly different. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed that most differential metabolites had opposite patterns between pair-wise groups. Qianggan extract restored the diet induced metabolite perturbations. Metabolite sets enrichment and pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the affected metabolites were mainly enriched in glycometabolism pathways such as glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway, fructose, and mannose metabolism. By compound-reaction-enzyme-gene network analysis, batches of genes (e.g. Hk1, Gck, Rpia, etc) or enzymes (e.g. hexokinase and glucokinase) related to metabolites in enriched pathways were obtained. Our findings demonstrated that Qianggan extract alleviated hyperglycemia, and the effects might be partially due to the regulation of glycometabolism related pathways.

Introduction

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used in clinical applications for thousands of years (Zhang et al., 2016b). TCM formulae are mainly composed of herbs and widely used to treat metabolic diseases, such as hepatic steatosis and type 2 diabetes (Liang et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2018). Herbal extracts from traditional Chinese medicines such as curcumin, capsaicin and ginsenosides have been effectively employed in preventing obesity and other metabolic diseases (Yu et al., 2018). Qianggan formula is a patent TCM drug, and composed of 16 ingredients. Qianggan formula has been implicated in clinical practice and proved to be effective in improving metabolic disease (Li et al., 2010; Gu and Huang, 2011; Wang et al., 2011). However, little has been reported the mechanisms underlying the efficacy, which needs to be clarified.

TCM is a holistic system, which comprises multicomponent complexes and has multiple therapeutic targets (Li et al., 2017). It would be helpful to apply systemic approaches to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Metabolomics is an important part of systems biology and provides global information of small molecule metabolites in complex biological processes (Crowther et al., 2018). It offers a powerful platform to investigate metabolic pathways, identify biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring diseases, and predict therapeutic targets of drugs (Guo et al., 2018; Procopet et al., 2018). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which possesses high resolution, sensitivity, and available database, is one of the powerful and popular tools in metabolomics studies (Shackleton et al., 2018). It has been extensively applied to assess the effects and explore metabolic mechanisms of TCM in treating diseases. By GC-MS based plasma metabolomics, Feng D, et al. identified potential biomarkers and established metabolic networks to explain the efficacy of Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction on traumatic brain injury (Feng et al., 2017). Gou XJ, et al. employed GC-MS to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of Qushi Huayu Decoction in a fatty liver rat model and obtained 23 potential biomarkers and several regulating metabolic pathways (Gou et al., 2017). Another study using GC-MS implicated the important roles of three carbohydrate metabolism pathways of Hedyotis diffusa decoction in preventing acute liver injury (Dai et al., 2017).

In the present study, GC-MS based metabolomics (liver and fecal samples) was employed to evaluate metabolic alterations of high fat and high sucrose (HFHS) diet fed rats, and obtain Qianggan extract affected metabolites. With the aid of pattern recognition, metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA), pathway enrichment analysis and compound-reaction-enzyme-gene network analysis, potential candidate metabolites, and relevant metabolic pathways were identified. Our study inferred the mechanisms of Qianggan extract on hyperglycermia and suggested a new pattern for studying TCM formula on metabolic diseases.

Material and Methods

Preparation of Qianggan Extract

Qianggan formula is a marketed TCM, which was prepared by 16 herbal materials. In this study, the Qianggan extract was prepared as previously reported (Zhu et al., 2019). Briefly, all of the ingredients: Artemisia scoparia Waldst. & Kitam. (Yin-Chen) 250 g, Isatis tinctoria L. (Ban-Lan-Gen) 125 g, Angelica sinensis(Oliv.)Diels. (Dang-Gui) 125 g, Paeonia lactiflora Pall. (Bai-Shao) 125 g, Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. (Dan-Shen) 250 g, Curcuma wenyujin Y.H.Chen et C.Ling. (Yu-Jin) 125 g, Astragalus membranaceus(Fisch.)Bunge. (Huang-Qi) 250 g, Codonopsis pilosula(Franch.)Nannf. (Dang-Shen) 125 g, Alisma orientale(Sam.)Juz. (Ze-Xie) 125 g, Polygonatum kingianum Collett& Hemsl. (Huang-Jing) 125 g, Rehmannia glutinosa (Gaertn.) DC. (Shen-Di) 125 g, Dioscorea oppositifolia L. (Shan-Yao) 125 g, Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge.(Shan-Zha) 100 g, Medicated Leaven Massa Medicata Fermentata (Liu-Shen-Qu) 100 g, Gentiana macrophylla Pall.(Qin-Jiao) 100 g, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. (Gan-Cao) 100 g were mixed and soaked in water, and then boiled for 2 h. These herbal materials were extracted by hot-water for three times, then mixed and filtrated to get the supernatants. After then, the pH of the supernatants was adjusted to 8.0, and concentrated the solution to a density ratio of 1.35 to obtain the Qianggan water extract. The extract was re-dissolved in acetonitrile-water (1:1, v/v) for chemical profiling analysis. A Agilent 1290 UPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, USA) coupled with Sciex TripleTOF 4600® quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany) equipped with a DuoSpray source was used for profiling the chemical constituents in Qianggan extract. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 column (2.1×100 mm, 1.7 μm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The following gradient condition was used: 0–3.0 min, 0% B; 3.0–5.0 min, 0% B-5% B; 5.0–7.0 min 5% B-15% B; 7.0–21.0 min, 15% B-30% B; 21.0-24.0 min, 30% B–48% B; 24.0-30.0 min, 48% B–60% B; 30.0-34.0 min, 60% B-95% B; 34.0–36.0 min, 95% B; 36.0–36.1 min, 95% B-0% B; 36.1–40.0 min, 0% B. The injection volumes for all samples were 5 μl. Column oven temperatures was set at 30 °C, while the flow rate was 0.3 ml/min. Ionization was conducted using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Data were collected under both positive and negative ion modes. The mass spectrometer was operated in full-scan TOF-MS at m/z 100-1500 and information-dependent acquisition (IDA) MS/MS modes, the collision energy was 40 ± 20 eV. Both ion source gas 1 and 2 were set 50 psi. Curtain gas was 35 psi. The temperature and ionspray voltage floating were 500°C and 5000/-4500 V, respectively. Data recording and processing was performed by Analyst Ver. 1.6 software (AB Sciex, USA).

Animal Experiments and Sample Collection

Six-week-old male Wistar rats were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd, China, and maintained in specific pathogen free (SPF) environment. According to the body weight, 24 rats were randomly divided into normal group (n=8), fed with chow diet, and HFHS group (n=16), fed with a diet composing 68% chow diet, 15% lard, 15% sucrose, and 2% cholesterol; After 6-week feeding, HFHS rats were further divided into untreated group (HFHS, n=8), and Qianggan extract intervened group (n=8) that fed with HFHS diet and administered with Qianggan extract that dissolved in distilled water (1.2 g/kg/d) via gavage. The rats were allocated with 4 per cage, and fed and/or intervened for another 4 weeks. At the end, animals were weighed after 12 h-fasting, euthanized with 2% pentobarbital sodium, and sacrificed. Blood was collected and serum was separated. The livers were weighed, divided into portions, and stored at -80°C.

The study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (PZSHUTCM191227006).

Serum Biochemical Analysis

Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), and blood glucose (BG) were analyzed using the Hitachi full-automatic system. Serum insulin and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum insulin and BG were used to calculate the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

Detection of Liver Glycogen

Liver glycogen was measured by commercial kit (Jiancheng Tech, Nanjing, China) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Briefly, 25 mg of liver tissue were pretreated with 30% KOH, ethanol, and saturated sodium sulfate. After collecting the supernatants, reagent anthrone and neutralized hydrolysate were added. The final solutions of reaction were read in microplate reader at 620 nm.

GC-MS Based Metabolomics Analysis

Sample preparation, GC-MS metabolomics analysis, and metabolite identification of liver tissue and feces were conducted by Shanghai Profleader Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). After adding 20-fold volume (μl/mg) of chloroform/methanol/water solvent (v/v/v=2:5:2) containing 10 μg/ml of L-norvaline and freezing at -40°C for 30 min, the frozen liver tissue samples were ground immediately by using a TissueLyser (type JX-24, Jingxin, Shanghai, China) with zirconia beads for 3 min at 50 Hz. The homogenates were incubated at -20°C for an hour, followed by vortex and centrifugation at 14,000 g and 4°C for 15 min. The extraction was repeated with methanol as solvent and the supernatants from the two extractions were combined. The combined supernatants (100 μl) and 13C6-15N-L-isoleucine (10 μl) were blended and dried under nitrogen gas. For the extraction of feces sample, a frozen feces sample was strongly vortexed in 10-fold volume (μl/mg) of ice-cold deionized water containing 10 μg/ml of 13C4-succinic acid, and then incubated at 4°C for 30 min. Following centrifugation at 16,000 g and 4°C for 15 min, the supernatant was collected. The extraction was repeated with deionized water as solvent and the supernatants from the two extractions were combined, followed by protein precipitation with four-fold volume (v/v) of methanol. After centrifugation, 500 μl combined supernatants were mixed and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen stream. The dried residues of liver or feces were dissolved in 30 μl methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine (20 mg/ml) and then incubated at 37°C for 90 min. After an addition of 30 μl BSTFA (with 1% TMCS), the sample was derivatized at 70°C for 60 min prior to GC-MS analysis. Quality control (QC) sample pooled from all samples were prepared and analyzed with the same procedure as those of the experiment samples. Blank samples were also prepared where sample was replaced by deionized water so as to monitor and remove the contaminants introduced during sample preparation and column bleeds.

Metabolomics analysis was conducted on an Agilent 7890A gas chromatography system coupled to an Agilent 5975C inert MSD system (Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA). The experiments were performed following the previously described protocol (Liu et al., 2018). Raw data were obtained in a full scan mode. The samples were run at random, and blank samples and QC samples were inserted during sample analysis.

Data Processing, Pattern Recognition, and Metabolites Structure Identification

GC-MS raw data were processed by TagFinder software (Luedemann et al., 2008) according to previously published methods (Gao et al., 2010). The final data was obtained, which included sample names, variables (rt_mz), and peak abundances. The added internal standards were utilized to monitor the GC-MS signal fluctuation during sample analysis. The metabolite peaks with relative standard deviation (RSD) value of abundances in QC samples larger than 30% were filtered out. After filtering, the qualified data were performed median normalization before performing further univariate and multivariate statistics.

Fold change was calculated as binary logarithm of average normalized peak intensity ratio between groups. To better understand the pattern of differential metabolites among groups, hierarchical clusters were performed by Cluster 3.0 software. Venn diagram of identified metabolites between liver and feces samples was visualized by a web tool (bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/).

To identify the structure of differential metabolites, GC-MS raw data were imported to AMDIS software and the purified mass spectra were compared to an in-house standard library, Golm Metabolome Database, and Agilent Fiehn GC-MS Metabolomics RTL Library.

Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) and Pathway Analysis

To identify biologically meaningful patterns and most relevant metabolic pathways of the differential metabolites, MSEA and pathway enrichment analysis were performed by MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) as previously described (Chong et al., 2018). To demonstrate the relationships among genes, proteins, and metabolites in related pathways, Compound-Reaction-Enzyme-Gene network was constructed by Cytoscape software plug-in Metscape (Karnovsky et al., 2012).

Statistical Analysis

By SIMCA software (version 14.1, Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden), principle component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were conducted for multivariate statistical analysis, where the data were preprocessed by unit variance (UV) scaling and mean centering. The model quality is estimated by R2X or R2Y and Q2 values. To avoid OPLS-DA model over-fitting, 200 times permutation tests were carried out. Then variable importance of projection (VIP) values were visualized in OPLS-DA model. For univariate statistical analysis, Welch's t test was conducted on the data of normal distribution, while Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was conducted on the data of abnormal distribution. Finally, the metabolites with VIP > 1 and p < 0.05 were identified as different metabolites.

Data were expressed as mean ± SD and were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by SPSS v22.0 software. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically different.

Results

Chemical Profiling of Qianggan Extract

The complexity of MS data acquired in both mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) mode requires reliable peak identification tools. In this work, SCIEX natural products HR-MS/MS Spectral Library was used for identification. The library contains additional compound entries with structural information and MS/MS spectra for 1,300 selected natural compounds. The assignment of each constitute was performed by comparing the retention times (Rt), MS data (accurate mass, isotopic distribution, and fragmentation pattern) of each constitute from Qianggan extract with SCIEX natural products HR-MS/MS Spectral Library (involving compound name, molecular formula, chemical structure, CAS No, accurate MS/MS spectra, ect.) and previously reported literature (Cao et al., 2011). With the help of PeakView 1.2 and MasterView 1.1, a total of 90 constitutes have been identified or tentatively characterized in Qianggan extract (compounds of 16 herbs) under positive or negative ion mode (Figure 1 and Table 1). Among them, 4 constitutes attributed to Cynanchum otophyllum, 6 attributed to Radix isatidis, 6 attributed to Radix Angelicae sinensis, 10 attributed to Radix Paeoniae Alba, 17 attributed to Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae, 2 attributed to Curcuma aromatic, 10 attributed to Astragalus membranaceus, 2 attributed to Codonopsis pilosula, 2 attributed to Rhizoma alismatis, 2 attributed to Rehmannia glutinosa, 7 attributed to Rhizoma Dioscoreae, 3 attributed to Hawthorn, 7 attributed to Medicated Leaven, 10 attributed to Fraxinus bungeana, 23 attributed to Radix liquiritiae. Un-expectably, no metabolite was detected from Rhizoma polygonat (Table 1).

Figure 1

Table 1

No.Retention time (min)NameFormulaIonMeasured m/zCalculated m/zError (ppm)Product ion (m/z)Attribution
10.84ArginineC6H14N4O2[M+H]+175.1194175.11902.6175.1197; 116.0707; 70.0646; 60.0558Radix isatidis, Rhizoma Dioscoreae
21.01GentianoseC18H32O16[M+FA-H]-549.1685549.16722.3549.1627; 503.1618; 341.1129; 221.0645; 179.0583; 143.0365; 89.0232; 59.0125Fraxinus bungeana
31.09Stachyose tetrahydrateC24H42O21[M-H]-665.2150665.21460.6665.2138; 485.1512; 443.1401; 383.1181; 341.1066; 221.0651; 179.0551; 161.0443; 101.0234Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
41.39SucroseC12H22O11[M-H]-341.1072341.1089-5.1341.1068; 179.0541; 149.0442; 115.0031; 89.0228; 71.0129Radix Paeoniae Alba, Radix Paeoniae Alba
51.76inulinC24H42O21[M+FA-H]-711.2177711.2201-2.2711.2218; 665.2181; 485.1483; 383.1194; 341.1081; 179.0551; 89.0233Codonopsis pilosula
61.95MaltotrioseC18H32O16[M-H]-503.1605503.1618-2.5503.1569; 341.1056; 281.0862; 221.0631; 179.0540; 89.0234Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
71.99uracilC4H4N2O2[M+H]+113.0344113.0346-1.4/Radix Paeoniae Alba
82.34RaffinoseC18H32O16[M-H]-503.1604503.1618-2.7503.1556; 341.1020; 221.0641; 179.0526; 143.0338; 119.0318; 89.0228; 59.0132Codonopsis pilosula, Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
92.94Citric acidC6H8O7[M-H]-191.0190191.0197-3.8191.0184; 111.0070; 87.0065Hawthorn, Radix Paeoniae Alba
103.542-O-a-D-glucopyranuronosyl-D-GalactoseC12H20O12[M-H]-355.0863355.0882-5.4355.0873; 181.0726; 173.0070; 111.0073; 87.0072; 57.0359Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
113.82tyrosineC9H11NO3[M+H]+182.0817182.08122.9/Rhizoma Dioscoreae
125.16UridineC9H12N2O6[M-H]-243.0611243.0623-4.8243.0625; 200.0559; 152.0357; 110.0234; 82.0315Radix isatidis
135.17verbascotetraoseC24H42O21[M+FA-H]-711.2186711.2201-2.1711.2238; 665.2139; 485.1462; 323.0960; 179.0536; 143.0337Rhizoma alismatis
146.39AdenosineC10H13N5O4[M+H]+268.1043268.10401.0268.1026; 136.0617; 119.0363Radix Angelicae sinensis, Radix Paeoniae AlbaRadix Paeoniae Alba, Medicated Leaven
156.53verbascose or isomerC30H52O26[M-H]-827.2659827.2674-1.8827.2655; 665.2270; 647.1999; 503.1571; 485.1452; 383.1153; 341.1031; 179.0544; 161.0431; 143.0331Rehmannia glutinosa, Rhizoma alismatis
166.63Dicaffeoyl quinic acid glucosideC31H34O17[M-H]-677.1776677.17236.5677.1765; 479.1077; 341.1034; 173.0074; 111.0064;Cynanchum otophyllum
176.84GuanosineC10H13N5O5[M-H]-282.0827282.0837-6.0282.0837; 150.0415; 133.0151; 108.0182Radix isatidis, Medicated Leaven
186.99Rehmannioside DC27H42O20[M+Cl]-721.1911721.1963-7.3721.1913; 263.0765; 221.0662; 179.0565; 149.0448; 119.0346; 89.0216Rehmannia glutinosa
197.48L-AlanineC15H24N4O5[M+H]+341.1814341.1819-1.6341.1809; 281.1604; 222.1125; 194.1171; 108.0798; 87.0443Radix Angelicae sinensis, Rhizoma Dioscoreae
207.546'-O-acetylscopolinC18H20O10[M-H]-385.0966395.0984-4.5197.0440; 179.0334; 135.0443; 123.0437; 72.9932Hawthorn
217.86(1,2,4-Triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine-3,7(8H)-dicarboxylic acid, 5,6-dihydro-, 7-(1,1-dimethylethyl) 3-ethyl ester)C13H20N4O4[M+H]+297.1560297.15570.9297.1514; 279.1415; 219.1114; 192.1014; 232.0799; 117.0562; 108.0448; 70.0650Radix Angelicae sinensis
228.07NeoChlorogenic acidC16H18O9[M-H]-353.0885353.08782.0353.0904; 191.0553; 179.0336; 135.0447; 85.0289Radix Angelicae sinensis
238.18 Loganic acid or isomerC16H24O10[M-H]-375.1298375.12970.3375.1325; 213.0779; 169.0874; 113.0248; 59.0137Fraxinus bungeana
[M+Na]+399.1262399.12620.1399.1256; 381.1205; 279.0706; 237.0698; 219.0615; 185.0417; 112.0864
248.21DesbenzoylpaeoniflorinC16H24O10[M-H]-375.1289375.1297-2.1375.1290; 213.0773; 169.0885; 151.0766; 113.0254; 89.0247; 69.0344Radix Paeoniae Alba
258.65salicylicacidC7H6O3[M-H]-137.0238137.0244-4.5137.0244; 92.0274Radix isatidis
268.67ArillatoseBC22H30O14[M+FA-H]-563.1626563.16181.5563.1598; 517.1596; 341.1119; 251.1756; 221.0637; 179.0552; 161.0438; 119.0344; 89.0243Fraxinus bungeana
[M+Na]+541.1526541.1528-0.3541.1537; 497.1683; 393.1005; 365.1040; 347.0938
278.74Chlorogenic acidC16H18O9[M-H]-353.0880353.08780.5191.0563; 85.0292Radix Angelicae sinensis
288.84SwertiamainC16H22O10[M+FA-H]-419.1196419.11950.2375.0668; 179.0551; 141.0186; 119.0382; 89.0253Fraxinus bungeana
298.90Chlorogenic acid isomerC16H18O9[M-H]-353.0881353.08780.6353.0908; 191.0573; 173.0466; 135.0460; 93.0343; 85.0300Radix Angelicae sinensis
309.42Kaempferol 3-rutinosideC27H30O15[M-H]-593.1498593.1512-2.4593.1508; 575.1468; 503.1116; 473.1058; 383.0763; 353.0642Radix isatidis, Medicated Leaven
319.44GentiopicrosideC16H20O9[M+FA-H]-401.1098401.10892.2401.1064; 193.0480; 179.0577; 149.0597; 113.0239; 89.0234; 59.0122Fraxinus bungeana
[M+Na]+379.0999379.1000-0.1379.1004; 217.0469; 199.0358; 185.0442; 155.0456
329.73ArtemisininC15H22O5[M-H]-281.1377281.1394-6.2/Medicated Leaven
339.94AlbiflorinC23H28O11[M+FA-H]-525.1629525.16142.9525.1586; 479.1544; 283.0819; 121.0290; 77.0390Radix Paeoniae Alba
[M+Na]+503.1523503.1524-0.2503.1534; 341.0989
3410.45PaeoniflorinC23H28O11[M+FA-H]-525.163525.16143.1525.1695; 449.1462; 431.1358; 327.1094; 309.0994; 165.0553; 121.0295; 113.0237; 77.0402Radix Paeoniae Alba
[M+Na]+503.1527503.15240.6503.1531; 341.1050
3510.865-Hydroxy ferulic acidC10H10O5[M-H]-209.0447209.0455-4.1209.0458; 165.0536; 121.0273; 76.0302Fraxinus bungeana
3611.28Agarotetrol C17H18O6[M+H]+319.1174319.1176-0.7319.1163; 301.1055; 283.0968; 255.1025; 227.1084; 192.0403; 164.0483; 125.0259; 91.0548Medicated Leaven
3711.65Calycosin-7-O-D-glucosideC22H22O10[M+H]+447.1285447.1286-0.2447.1251; 343.0117; 285.0749; 270.0521; 225.0553Curcuma aromatic
3811.81RutinC27H30O16[M-H]-609.1468609.14611.1/Medicated Leaven
3911.93Isoliquiritin apiosideC26H30O13[M-H]-549.1624549.16141.9549.1608; 429.1245; 255.0668; 135.0098; 119.0500Radix liquiritiae
[M+Na]+573.158573.15790.2573.1611; 441.1097; 317.0843
4012.1LiquiritinC21H22O9[M-H]-417.1196417.11911.2417.1188; 255.0652; 135.0091; 119.0506Radix liquiritiae
[M+Na]+441.1158441.11560.4441.1152
4112.55GalloylpaeoniflorinC30H32O15[M-H]-631.1675631.16681.0631.1697; 613.1596; 465.1354; 399.0920; 313.0558; 271.0492; 211.0313; 169.0139Radix Paeoniae Alba
4213.471,5-Dicaffeoyl quinic acidC25H24O12[M-H]-515.1204515.11951.7515.1171; 353.0843; 335.0722; 191.0566; 179.0353; 173.0573; 161.0240; 135.0451Cynanchum otophyllum
4313.59VerbascosideC29H36O15[M-H]-623.1963623.1981-3.0623.1894; 461.1569; 161.0238; 133.0329Curcuma aromatic
4414.013,5-Dicaffeoyl quinic acidC25H24O12[M-H]-515.1201515.11951.2355.0894; 191.0565; 179.0359; 135.0444Cynanchum otophyllum
4514.612-O-Caffeoyl arbutin C21H22O10[M-H]-433.1128433.1140-2.8433.1067; 271.0576; 177.0185; 151.0028;119.0500Fraxinus bungeana
4614.844,5-Dicaffeoyl quinic acidC25H24O12[M-H]-515.1205515.11951.9515.1185; 353.0891; 191.0581; 179.0346; 173.0454; 135.0462Cynanchum otophyllum
4714.93Salvianolic acid EC36H30O116[M-H]-717.1466717.14610.7717.1361; 519.0920; 339.0496; 321.0396; 295.0579; 279.0427; 197.0415Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
4815.02Paeoniflorin isomerC23H28O11[M+FA-H]-525.1604525.1614-1.8525.1603; 479.1536; 121.0291Radix Paeoniae Alba
[M+Na]+503.1529503.15241.0503.1536; 381.1242; 341.1002; 219.0640
4915.36Rosmarinic acidC18H16O8[M-H]-359.0774359.07720.4359.0757; 197.0443; 179.0371; 161.0230; 133.0293; 72.9927Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
5015.88Salvianolic acid A isomerC26H22O10[M-H]-493.1146493.11401.2493.1211; 313.0726; 295.0628; 253.0502; 185.0271; 159.0460; 109.0288Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
5116.17LicurasideC26H30O13[M-H]-549.1594549.1614-3.6549.1611; 417.1174; 255.0661; 135.0072; 91.0184Radix liquiritiae
5216.28BuddleosideC28H32O14[M-H]-591.1721591.17190.3591.1748; 549.1602; 459.1312; 255.0652; 135.0089Radix isatidis
5316.45OnoninC22H22O9[M+FA-H]-475.1252475.12461.3267.0649; 2224.0498Curcuma aromatic
[M+Na]+431.1337431.13370.1269.0809; 254.0543; 213.0892
5416.85Liquiritin isomerC21H22O9[M-H]-417.1188417.1191-0.7417.1189; 255.0643; 148.0160; 135.0091; 119.0491; 92.0246Radix liquiritiae
[M+H]+419.1336419.1337-0.1257.0812; 239.0707; 147.0437; 137.0221
5517.19Salvianolic acid BC36H30O16[M-H]-717.1482717.14612.9739.1302; 559.0863; 515.0974; 335.0553; 291.0662; 159.0476Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
[M+Na]+741.1413741.1426-1.8741.1432; 561.1045; 543.0893; 517.1098; 381.0592; 363.0459; 337.0685; 221.0402
5617.84Licorice-giycoside BC35H36O15[M-H]-695.1981695.1981-0.1695.1943; 549.1603; 399.1013; 255.0625Radix liquiritiae
5717.89Licorice-giycoside AC36H38O16[M-H]-725.2089725.20870.3725.2075; 549.1691; 531.1523; 399.1117; 255.0649; 193.0486; 119.0499; 72.9902Radix liquiritiae
5818.14Methylnissolin-3-O-glucosideC23H26O10[M+FA-H]-507.1500507.1508-1.6/Curcuma aromatic
5918.15LiquiritigeninC15H12O4[M-H]-255.0668255.06632.0255.2316; 219.8452; 201.8352; 166.8654; 119.0503; 91.0173Radix liquiritiae
[M+H]+257.0810257.08080.6257.0820; 242.0593; 153.0696; 147.0458; 137.0233; 119.0495; 81.-334
6018.469,10-DiMP-3-O-acetyl-GlcC25H28O11[M+Na]+521.1077521.1054-0.5521.1135; 493.1161; 341.0643; 323.0554; 295.0588; 277.0514; 249.0541; 181.0483; 163.0387; 139.0385; 111.0480Curcuma aromatic
6118.58Salvianolic acid LC36H30O16[M-H]-717.1478717.14612.4717.1490; 519.0934; 339.0504; 321.0401; 295.0603; 279.0275; 185.0240Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
6218.9PectolinarinC29H34O15[M+H]+623.1970623.1970-0.1623.2009; 477.1407; 315.0876; 300.0637Curcuma aromatic
6318.94Salvianolic acid YC36H30O16[M-H]-717.1476717.14612.2717.1451; 673.1693; 519.0950; 339.0534; 321.0403; 295.0644; 249.0569; 185.0238; 109.0279Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
6418.98Salvianolic acid CC26H20O10[M-H]-491.0994491.09842.1491.1013; 311.0580; 293.0470; 267.0648; 250.0631; 197.0463; 135.0456Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
6519.05Salvianolic acid A or isomerC26H22O10[M-H]-493.1128493.1140-2.5493.1165; 313.0737; 295.0611; 185.0238; 159.0442; 109.0287Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
[M+Na]+517.1101517.1105-0.8517.1129; 319.0485; 297.0763; 251.0721; 223.0743; 221.0433; 205.0626; 152.0622; 131.0527
6619.24CalycosinC16H12O5[M-H]-283.0615283.06121.1283.0622; 268.0406; 239.0352; 211.0388; 197.9039; 148.02229Curcuma aromatic
[M+H]+285.0763285.07581.9285.0742; 270.0505; 253.0485; 213.0542; 197.0594; 137.0230; 89.0370
6719.37QuercetinC15H10O7[M-H]-301.0337301.0354-5.6301.0323; 151.0022Fraxinus bungeana, Hawthorn, Medicated Leaven
6822.2022-hydroxyl-licorice-saponin G2C42H62O18[M-H]-853.3820853.38051.8853.3850; 351.0586Radix liquiritiae
6922.90Licoricesaponin A3C48H72O21[M-H]-983.4447983.4449-4.7983.4515; 821.4051; 351.0644; 175.0356Radix liquiritiae
7023.54Glyyunnanprosapogenin D or isomerC42H62O17[M-H]-837.3920837.39140.7837.3943; 351.0601Radix liquiritiae
7124.20Glyyunnanprosapogenin D or isomerC42H62O17[M-H]-837.3874837.3914-4.8837.3881; 351.0565Radix liquiritiae
7224.46Glyyunnanprosapogenin D or isomerC42H62O17[M-H]-837.3934837.39142.4837.3960; 351.0556Radix liquiritiae
7324.5316-Oxoalisol AC30H48O6[M+H]+505.3529505.35241.1505.3522; 415.2821; 353.2462; 191.1445; 107.0845Rhizoma alismatis
7424.7Glycyrrhizic AcidC42H62O16[M-H]-821.3988821.39652.8821.3988; 351.0554Radix liquiritiae
[M+Na]+845.3940845.39301.2845.3945; 669.3590; 493.3277; 375.0511
7524.94alisol C 23-acetateC32H48O6[M+H]+529.3525529.35240.3/Rhizoma alismatis
7625.03Licorice saponin B2C42H64O15[M-H]-807.4134807.4172-4.8807.4152; 351.0538Radix liquiritiae
7725.18Uraisaponin BC42H62O16[M-H]-821.3988821.39652.8821.4015; 351.0589Radix liquiritiae
7825.16Glycyrrhetinic acid MonoglucuronideC36H54O10[M+H]+647.3785647.3790-0.7647.3812; 453.3368; 435.3196; 407.3384; 253.1876; 217.1558; 177.1634; 149.1341Radix liquiritiae
7925.38Glycyrrhizic Acid isomerC42H62O16[M-H]-821.3981821.39651.9821.4016; 351.0611Radix liquiritiae
8025.63alisol C 23-acetateC32H48O6[M+H]+529.3525529.35240.3529.3536; 511.3355; 469.3326; 451.3232; 415.2877; 217.1586Rhizoma alismatis
8126.31DemethoxycurcuminC20H18O5[M-H]-337.1060337.1081-6.4/Curcuma aromatic
8226.48curcuminC21H20O6[M-H]-367.1172367.1187-4.1367.1182; 309.-398; 241.0083; 203.-723; 173.0237; 59.0105Curcuma aromatic
8326.80alisol CC30H46O5[M+H]+487.3418487.34180.1487.3419; 451.3200; 433.3082; 397.2727; 353.2452; 175.1108; 147.1156Rhizoma alismatis
8427.36Astragaloside IC45H72O16[M-H]-913.4825913.48022.5913.4793; 867.4743Curcuma aromatic
8527.63Licoisoflavone AC20H18O6[M-H]-353.1021353.1031-2.7353.0998; 125.0346Radix liquiritiae
8627.94Dimethyldibenzylidene SorbitolC24H30O6[M+H]+415.2120415.21151.2119.0853; 115.0516; 91.0545Rhizoma alismatis
8728.05tanshinoneII AC19H20O3[M+H]+297.1488297.14850.9297.1413; 253.1594; 222.0666; 1666.0784; 128.0643; 73.0466Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
8828.77dihydrotanshinone IC18H14O3[M+H]+279.1020279.10201.5279.0990; 261.0918; 233.0961; 190.0759; 169.0641; 141.0687; 115.0537Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae
8930.50alisol BC30H48O4[M+H]+473.3628473.36250.6/Rhizoma alismatis
9031.54cryptotanshinoneC19H20O3[M+H]+297.1490297.14851.6297.1471; 268.1102; 236.1164; 209.0977; 165.0714; 155.0923Radix Salviae miltiorrhizae

The detected ion chromatogram of constitutes in Qianggan extract.

The Effect of Qianggan Extract on Hyperglycemia in Rats

Rats feeding HFHS diet showed hyperglycemia, as the blood glucose was significantly increased compared with chow diet control rats (Figure 2A). Four-week Qianggan extract treatment restored the blood glucose increase to normal level (Figure 2A). Similar trend was also observed in HbAlc levels (Figure 2B). Although the insulin level has no statistical difference among groups (Figure 2C), HOMA-IR was significantly increased in HFHS rats (Figure 2D), and Qianggan extract treatment markedly reduced HOMA-IR value. Glucose can be stored in the form of glycogen in liver, and liver glycogen is critical in maintaining glucose homeostasis (von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff et al., 2013). We found obviously decreased liver glycogen in HFHS rats, and Qianggan extract treatment significantly increased liver glycogen content (Figure 2E). Qianggan extract treatment also partially restored the increased serum ALT and AST levels in HFHS rats, however, the body weight, liver weight, and serum lipids did not show statistical difference among groups (Table 2).

Figure 2

Table 2

ParametersControlHFHSQianggan
Body weight (g)385.90 ± 27.29403.50 ± 29.24381.90 ± 26.48
Liver weight (g)9.17 ± 0.929.49 ± 0.718.97 ± 1.13
Serum ALT34.93 ± 5.3256.01 ± 31.07*30.61 ± 7.46
Serum AST150.50 ± 19.39191.00 ± 45.92*118.60 ± 19.21
Serum TG0.88 ± 0.310.61 ± 0.26**0.52 ± 0.19
Serum TC1.42 ± 0.171.29 ± 0.081.50 ± 0.15
Serum HDL-c0.57 ± 0.060.51 ± 0.03*0.52 ± 0.09
Serum LDL-c0.13 ± 0.170.02 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.05

Phenotypic parameters of the rats.

*

P < 0.05, **P < 0.05, HFHS vs control; P < 0.05 Qianggan vs HFHS.

Metabolite Profile and Differential Metabolites Identification

To unravel the mechanisms under the efficacy of Qianggan extract, metabolomics were conducted to obtain metabolite profiles and identify differential metabolites in liver tissue and fecal samples. The GC-MS chromatograms of liver and fecal samples were presented in Supplemental Figure 1. PCA and OPLS-DA models were established to visualize clusters and different metabolic patterns among groups. For liver tissues, PCA model did not clearly separate control, HFHS and Qianggan groups (Figure 3A). However, OPLS-DA model revealed good separation among three groups (Figure 3B). Parameters of R2X=0.512, R2Y= 0.913, and Q2 = 0.277, indicating the good quality and accurate prediction of the model. Two hundred permutation tests were further performed, with R2 = 0.72 and Q2=-0.605, suggesting the reliability of the OPLS-DA model (Figure 3C). To identify differential metabolites between HFHS diet and Qianggan treated groups, PCA and OPLS-DA models were built. PCA did not clearly discriminate the two groups, but a good separation was observed by OPLS-DA plots (Figures 3D, E), implicating Qianggan extract improved metabolite perturbations induced by HFHS diet. Permutation test implicated the validity of OPLS-DA model with R2 = 0.992 and Q2=-0.264 (Figure 3F). Moreover, metabolites with VIP value > 1 were obtained. Coupled with univariate statistical analysis (p < 0.05), 18 metabolites (e.g. glucose-6-phosphate, fructose-6-phosphate and ribose-5-phosphate) were identified to be significantly different between HFHS diet and Qianggan treated groups (Table 3).

Figure 3

Table 3

rt/minm/zmetabolitesVIPP valueLog2(fold change) Qianggan vs HFHS
17.26174gamma-aminobutyric acid1.3130.0380.559
22.22103fructose1.7740.038-0.969
22.38319mannose1.7230.026-0.735
22.92205mannitol1.5790.029-0.651
28.42361lactose1.4950.038-0.745
20.89357glycerol-3-phosphate1.5540.026-0.290
12.5174glycine1.8540.0290.413
6.96219lactic acid1.7330.0300.572
26.37387glucose-6-phosphate1.6030.026-1.447
26.29315fructose-6-phosphate1.4780.033-0.930
7.32177glycolic acid1.5570.0190.685
22.92333glucuronic acid1.6760.026-0.662
27.69387sedoheptulose-7-phosphate1.6460.019-0.974
24.65315ribose-5-phosphate1.3830.019-0.493
8.431312-hydroxybutyric acid1.7070.0260.717
24.61441uric acid1.6140.0371.727
28.6361maltose1.6730.026-0.753
23.08333galacturonic acid1.5810.050-0.486

Significantly different metabolites in liver tissues.

Same analyses in fecal samples were performed (Figure 4). OPLS-DA plots demonstrated clear separations among three groups (control, HFHS diet and Qianggan treated groups) and in pairwise groups (HFHS diet vs Qianggan intervened groups). Permutation test showed good prediction of the model. By the cutoff of VIP > 1 and p < 0.05, we obtained 30 differential metabolites (e.g. maltose, glycolic acid, and 4-hydroxyproline), suggesting Qianggan extract ameliorated HFHS diet induced metabolite disturbance in feces. Detailed metabolite information was listed in Table 4.

Figure 4

Table 4

rt/minm/zmetabolitesVIPP valueLog2(fold change) Qianggan vs HFHS
9.61187heptanoic acid1.5650.007-1.943
28.58361maltose1.3830.017-1.576
17.972673-hydroxybenzoic acid1.3400.018-1.491
19.9260N-methylglutamic acid1.3720.009-1.477
19.29103lyxose1.4390.015-1.382
19.54103arabinose1.2960.043-1.378
16.56202p-hydroxybenzaldehyde1.4870.010-1.376
25.96144spermidine1.5050.007-1.284
23333glucuronic acid1.5160.007-1.187
14.98104hydrocinnamic acid1.3830.027-1.059
20.92292lyxonic acid1.3370.043-0.961
16.06218aminomalonic acid1.3910.019-0.873
17.222304-hydroxyproline1.3320.024-0.866
20.3117rhamnose1.2360.015-0.807
11.7174ethanolamine1.2410.0330.481
24.88352guanine1.2670.0260.555
24.52217myo-inositol1.4750.0060.698
25.08327heptadecanoic acid1.3710.0260.725
21.61273citric acid1.3420.0200.750
7.67205glycolic acid1.1970.0410.840
9.082193-hydroxypropanoic acid1.5180.0090.860
15.831743-aminoisobutanoic acid1.1210.0330.962
17.29304gamma-aminobutyric acid1.5970.0061.067
8.82219oxalic acid1.6630.0041.071
20.77142ornithine1.3860.0261.186
23.26299pentadecanoic acid1.4580.0151.267
19.64202asparagine1.5490.0061.417
31.5329cholesterol0.9850.0261.771
9.27165p-cresol1.5020.0071.827
30.76370coprostanol1.1690.0091.845

Significantly different metabolites in fecal samples.

To better visualize the patterns of differential metabolites, hierarchical clusters were performed. As shown in Figures 5A, B, distinct discrimination can be observed in pairwise groups in both liver and fecal samples. Of interest, most metabolites are in opposite pattern between HFHS vs Control and Qiangggan vs HFHS. For instance, glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate levels were higher in HFHS diet group compared to control group, but significantly decreased in Qiangggan intervened group. The data implicated that Qianggan extract markedly restored HFHS diet induced metabolites disturbance, and the affected metabolites might be potential targets of the compound. By Venn diagram (Figure 5C), we observed four overlapped metabolites between liver and fecal samples. In all, we obtained 44 potential metabolites used for further analysis.

Figure 5

MSEA and Metabolic Pathway Analysis

To understand the biological meaning and relevant metabolic pathways of the identified 44 metabolites, comprehensive MSEA and pathway enrichment analysis were performed. As shown in Figure 6, these metabolites were enriched in 43 metabolic pathways, and the top 10 were all glycometabolism related pathways (e.g. glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway, fructose and mannose metabolism, etc), and the alteration of these pathways might account for the efficacy of Qianggan extract on hyperglycemia. Of note, these metabolic pathways interconnected with each other and formed a complex network. Furthermore, to understand the complicated correlations among genes, enzymes, and metabolites in enriched pathways, we constructed the compound-reaction-enzyme-gene network (Figure 7). For instance, the metabolite glucose-6-phosphate was disturbed by HFHS diet and improved by Qiangggan extract, and predictably, related genes (e.g. Gck, Hk1, Hk2, etc) and enzymes (e.g. glucokinase, hexokinase, etc) in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway were involved in the regulation process.

Figure 6

Figure 7

Discussion

In the present study, we illustrated the effect of Qiangggan extract on diet induced hyperglycemia, and through the analysis of metabolomics, we identified glycometabolism related pathways were involved in the metabolic disturbance and under the benefit effects of Qianggan extract.

Metabolomics has been extensively employed in detecting metabolites profiles to explore the pathophysiology of diseases, predict potential biomarkers, and identify drug targets (Sun et al., 2014). The balance of glucose metabolism was impaired in patients with liver injury (Guo et al., 2015) and steatosis (Hu et al., 2018).

Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis are critical pathways in keeping glucose balance (Petersen et al., 2017). Glycolysis is a glucose utilization process, which converts glucose into pyruvate or lactate. Gluconeogenesis is opposite to that of glycolysis, which synthesizes glucose from other metabolites like pyruvate, lactate, and glucogenic amino acids (Tang et al., 2018). Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis possess several reversible enzyme-catalyzed reactions and share a series of common intermediates such as glucose-6-phosphate, fructose-6-phosphate, fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate, lactate, etc (Sharabi et al., 2015). The net flux toward glycolysis or gluconeogenesis may be regulated by the key enzymes or their related metabolites which could be influenced by multi-factors such as nutrients and drugs. Using metabolomics approach, Wan et al. reported several intermediates including fructose 6-phosphate and 6-phospho-gluconate were elevated in high fat diet fed rats liver, and the alteration was reversed by vine tea, which implicated the efficacy partially by altering glycolysis or gluconeogenesis (Wan et al., 2017). It is also reported that HFHS diet could induce accelerated gluconeogenesis to yield glucose (Commerford et al., 2001). Our data were in accordance with previous studies to some extent. We noticed that glycolysis or gluconeogenesis intermediates glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate were raised after HFHS diet feeding. Qianggan extract administration restored the increase of glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate and raised lactic acid, implicating that Qiangggan extract improved glucose metabolism disorders partially by accelerating glycolysis or suppressing gluconeogenesis. Similar results were also exhibited in another insulin resistance rat model, which reported that coreopsis tinctoria flowering tops (traditionally employed to improve hyperglycemia) could reduce the increase of fructose 6-phosphate and 6-phosphogluconate induced by high fat diet (Jiang et al., 2015).

Pentose phosphate pathway branches from glycolysis via glucose-6-phosphate at the first committed step (Cho et al., 2018). Dong et al. employed metabolomics to explore biomarkers of different stage of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and demonstrated that pentose phosphate pathway was involved in the progress of NAFLD (Dong et al., 2017). Another study reported that pentose phosphate pathway was related to diabetes retinopathy and relevant metabolites were increased (Chen et al., 2016). In the present study, hyperglycemia status showed elevated metabolites that related to pentose phosphate pathway, such as glucose-6-phosphate, ribose-5-phosphate, and sedoheptulose-7-phosphate, which were attenuated by Qianggan extract. Our data were partly in line with previous studies (Hong et al., 2017), suggested the alteration of pentose phosphate pathway more or less account for the efficacy of Qiangggan extract. Besides, glycogenesis (glycogen synthesis) is reliant on glycolysis and starts with glucose-6-phosphate, is the process of glucose storage and vital in the maintenance of glucose concentration (Han et al., 2016). It was reported that glycogen content was decreased in high fat diet induced obese rats, and improved by octreotide which might serve as a novel treatment of obesity (Wang et al., 2017). Our data showed that the level of glycogen was significantly lowered in hyperglycemia and improved after Qiangggan extract intervention, which were consistent with the previous studies.

In addition, fructose and mannose metabolism also disturbed under metabolic dysfunctions. Zhang et al. found metabolites fructose and mannose were markedly elevated, which were deemed to be potential biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in patients (Zhang et al., 2016a). Boztepe et al performed microarray analysis to explore molecular responses to high glucose, and identified fructose and mannose metabolism was altered (Boztepe and Gulec, 2018). The data suggested that fructose and mannose metabolism play a role in metabolic diseases. Consistently, we also observed increased metabolites of fructose, mannitol, and mannose in hyperglycemia group compared to control group, whereas, Qiangggan extract significantly lowered the expression of these metabolites, suggesting potential targets of Qianggan extract.

A compound-reaction-enzyme-gene network was visualized to help in understanding the complex relations among metabolites, proteins, or genes in relevant metabolic pathways. For instance, we noticed that hexokinase (encoded by genes Hk1, Hk2 and Hk3) and glucokinase (encoded by Gck) might regulate glucose-6-phosphate. Besides hexokinase, many other enzymes such as fructose-bisphosphatase (encoded by Fbp1 and Fbp2) and mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (encode by Mpi) were related to the regulation of fructose-5-phosphate. Several enzymes such as ribokinase (encoded by Rbks) and ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (encoded by Rpia) may play a role in modulating the level of ribose-5-phosphate. Our findings were corroborated by abundant previous studies. For example, the activators of the enzyme glucokinase which converts glucose to glucose-6-phosphate in glycolysis, could ameliorate hyperglycemia and have been used as novel glucose-lowering drugs in diabetic models (Erion et al., 2014; Rubtsov et al., 2015). The enzyme ribose-5-phosphate isomerase was correlated with live cancer and has been identified as potential target of therapy (Ciou et al., 2015). Further investigations on identified metabolites and their related enzymes may ascertain Qiangggan extract targets and obtain novel therapies to treat high glucose related diseases.

Notably, the dosage of Qianggan extract for alleviating hyperglycemia was two times of the dosage used for improving fatty liver disease in rats, but the proper dosage for human needs to be optimized in the clinical settings. Our data were based on GC-MS metabolomics. We identified potential metabolites, relevant pathways, and key enzymes, however, we did not detect the expressions of correlated genes or enzymes in specific metabolic pathways. Comprehensive investigation of transcriptomics or proteomics and drug-metabolites interactions should be performed to mutually validate our finding from metabolomics (Ge, 2019; Zhou et al., 2019). In addition, our findings were obtained from animal models, and massive experiments and clinical investigations should be employed to further verify the data and for later clinical translation.

Conclusion

Qiangggan extract restored diet-induced glucose metabolism perturbations. The efficacy might partially due to the regulation of relevant glycometabolism pathways such as glycolysis or gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway, glycogenesis, fructose, and mannose metabolism. Our findings may infer the potential mechanisms of Qianggan extract on hyperglycemia.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81620108030, 81774084). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Ethics statement

All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and the approval number is PZSHUTCM191227006.

Author contributions

GJ and LZ designed the study. ML, WZ, and LZ performed the experiment. GG performed the chemical profiling. MZ analyzed the data. MZ, LZ, and GJ wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Xiaoyan Huang for her help in animal experiment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.00671/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    BoztepeT.GulecS. (2018). Investigation of the influence of high glucose on molecular and genetic responses: an in vitro study using a human intestine model. Genes Nutr.13, 11. doi: 10.1186/s12263-018-0602-x

  • 2

    CaoG.ShanQ.LiX.CongX.ZhangY.CaiH.et al. (2011). Analysis of fresh Mentha haplocalyx volatile components by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Analyst136 (22), 46534661. doi: 10.1039/c1an15616k

  • 3

    ChenL.ChengC. Y.ChoiH.IkramM. K.SabanayagamC.TanG. S.et al. (2016). Plasma Metabonomic Profiling of Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes65 (4), 10991108. doi: 10.2337/db15-0661

  • 4

    ChoE. S.ChaY. H.KimH. S.KimN. H.YookJ. I. (2018). The Pentose Phosphate Pathway as a Potential Target for Cancer Therapy. Biomol. Ther. (Seoul)26 (1), 2938. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.179

  • 5

    ChongJ.SoufanO.LiC.CarausI.LiS.BourqueG.et al. (2018). MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.46 (W1), W486W494. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky310

  • 6

    CiouS. C.ChouY. T.LiuY. L.NiehY. C.LuJ. W.HuangS. F.et al. (2015). Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase A regulates hepatocarcinogenesis via PP2A and ERK signaling. Int. J. Cancer137 (1), 104115. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29361

  • 7

    CommerfordS. R.BizeauM. E.McRaeH.JampolisA.ThresherJ. S.PagliassottiM. J. (2001). Hyperglycemia compensates for diet-induced insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle of rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.281 (5), R1380R1389. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.5.R1380

  • 8

    CrowtherL. M.PomsM.PleckoB. (2018). Multiomics tools for the diagnosis and treatment of rare neurological disease. J. Inherit Metab. Dis.41 (3), 425434. doi: 10.1007/s10545-018-0154-7

  • 9

    DaiM.WangF.ZouZ.XiaoG.ChenH.YangH. (2017). Metabolic regulations of a decoction of Hedyotis diffusa in acute liver injury of mouse models. Chin. Med.12, 35. doi: 10.1186/s13020-017-0159-4

  • 10

    DongS.ZhanZ. Y.CaoH. Y.WuC.BianY. Q.LiJ. Y.et al. (2017). Urinary metabolomics analysis identifies key biomarkers of different stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol.23 (15), 27712784. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2771

  • 11

    ErionD. M.LapworthA.AmorP. A.BaiG.VeraN. B.ClarkR. W.et al. (2014). The hepatoselective glucokinase activator PF-04991532 ameliorates hyperglycemia without causing hepatic steatosis in diabetic rats. PloS One9 (5), e97139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097139

  • 12

    FengD.XiaZ.ZhouJ.LuH.ZhangC.FanR.et al. (2017). Metabolomics reveals the effect of Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction on plasma metabolism in rats with acute traumatic brain injury. Oncotarget8 (55), 9469294710. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21876

  • 13

    GaoX.Pujos-GuillotE.SebedioJ. L. (2010). Development of a quantitative metabolomic approach to study clinical human fecal water metabolome based on trimethylsilylation derivatization and GC/MS analysis. Anal. Chem.82 (15), 64476456. doi: 10.1021/ac1006552

  • 14

    GeG. B. (2019). Deciphering the metabolic fates of herbal constituents and the interactions of herbs with human metabolic system. Chin. J. Nat. Med.17 (11), 801802. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(19)30098-6

  • 15

    GouX. J.FengQ.FanL. L.ZhuJ.HuY. Y. (2017). Serum and Liver Tissue Metabonomic Study on Fatty Liver in Rats Induced by High-Fat Diet and Intervention Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine Qushi Huayu Decoction. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.2017, 6242697. doi: 10.1155/2017/6242697

  • 16

    GuS.HuangM. X. (2011). [Clinical observation of Qianggan capsule in the treatment of non-alcoholic of non-alcoholic fatty liver fibrosis]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi19 (10), 791792.

  • 17

    GuoC. H.SunT. T.WengX. D.ZhangJ. C.ChenJ. X.DengG. J. (2015). The investigation of glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in subjects of chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.8 (10), 1338113386.

  • 18

    GuoW.TanH. Y.WangN.WangX.FengY. (2018). Deciphering hepatocellular carcinoma through metabolomics: from biomarker discovery to therapy evaluation. Cancer Manag Res.10, 715734. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S156837

  • 19

    HanH. S.KangG.KimJ. S.ChoiB. H.KooS. H. (2016). Regulation of glucose metabolism from a liver-centric perspective. Exp. Mol. Med.48, e218. doi: 10.1038/emm.2015.122

  • 20

    HongM.JungJ.ParkH. S.LeeS. M.JeongN. J.KimS. H.et al. (2017). Shaofu Zhuyu decoction ameliorates obesity-mediated hepatic steatosis and systemic inflammation by regulating metabolic pathways. PloS One12 (6), e0178514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178514

  • 21

    HuY. B.LiuX. Y.ZhanW. (2018). Farnesoid X receptor agonist INT-767 attenuates liver steatosis and inflammation in rat model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Drug Des. Devel. Ther.12, 22132221. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S170518

  • 22

    JiangB.LeL.WanW.ZhaiW.HuK.XuL.et al. (2015). The Flower Tea Coreopsis tinctoria Increases Insulin Sensitivity and Regulates Hepatic Metabolism in Rats Fed a High-Fat Diet. Endocrinology156 (6), 20062018. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1015

  • 23

    KarnovskyA.WeymouthT.HullT.TarceaV. G.ScardoniG.LaudannaC.et al. (2012). Metscape 2 bioinformatics tool for the analysis and visualization of metabolomics and gene expression data. Bioinformatics28 (3), 373380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr661

  • 24

    LiL.ZhangX. J.LanY.XuL.ZhangX. Z.WangH. H. (2010). Treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by Qianggan Capsule. Chin. J. Integr. Med.16 (1), 2327. doi: 10.1007/s11655-010-0023-1

  • 25

    LiX.ZhangY.WangY.XuJ.XinP.MengY.et al. (2017). The Mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine Underlying the Prevention and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease. Front. Pharmacol.8, 634. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00634

  • 26

    LiangS.ZhangY.DengY.HeY.LiangY.LiangZ.et al. (2018). The Potential Effect of Chinese Herbal Formula Hongqijiangzhi Fang in Improving NAFLD: Focusing on NLRP3 Inflammasome and Gut Microbiota. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.2018, 5378961. doi: 10.1155/2018/5378961

  • 27

    LiuY.WuS.SunW.ChenS.YangX.YangX. (2018). Variation in proteomics and metabolomics of chicken hepatocytes exposed to medium with or without folic acid. J. Cell Biochem.119 (7), 61136124. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26810

  • 28

    LuedemannA.StrassburgK.ErbanA.KopkaJ. (2008). TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments. Bioinformatics24 (5), 732737. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn023

  • 29

    PetersenM. C.VatnerD. F.ShulmanG. I. (2017). Regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.13 (10), 572587. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.80

  • 30

    ProcopetB.FischerP.FarcauO.StefanescuH. (2018). Metabolomics: From liver chiromancy to personalized precision medicine in advanced chronic liver disease. World J. Hepatol.10 (3), 371378. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i3.371

  • 31

    RubtsovP. M.IgudinE. L.TiulpakovA. N. (2015). [Glucokinase and glucokinase regulatory proteins as molecular targets for novel antidiabetic drugs]. Mol. Biol. (Mosk)49 (4), 555560. doi: 10.7868/S002689841504014X

  • 32

    ShackletonC.PozoO. J.MarcosJ. (2018). GC/MS in Recent Years Has Defined the Normal and Clinically Disordered Steroidome: Will It Soon Be Surpassed by LC/Tandem MS in This Role? J. Endocr. Soc.2 (8), 974996. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00135

  • 33

    SharabiK.TavaresC. D.RinesA. K.PuigserverP. (2015). Molecular pathophysiology of hepatic glucose production. Mol. Aspects Med.46, 2133. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2015.09.003

  • 34

    SunH.ZhangS.ZhangA.YanG.WuX.HanY.et al. (2014). Metabolomic analysis of diet-induced type 2 diabetes using UPLC/MS integrated with pattern recognition approach. PloS One9 (3), e93384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093384

  • 35

    TangY.ZhangY.WangC.SunZ.LiL.ChengS.et al. (2018). Overexpression of PCK1 Gene Antagonizes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through the Activation of Gluconeogenesis and Suppression of Glycolysis Pathways. Cell Physiol. Biochem.47 (1), 344355. doi: 10.1159/000489811

  • 36

    von Wilamowitz-MoellendorffA.HunterR. W.Garcia-RochaM.KangL.Lopez-SoldadoI.LantierL.et al. (2013). Glucose-6-phosphate-mediated activation of liver glycogen synthase plays a key role in hepatic glycogen synthesis. Diabetes62 (12), 40704082. doi: 10.2337/db13-0880

  • 37

    WanW.JiangB.SunL.XuL.XiaoP. (2017). Metabolomics reveals that vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) prevents high-fat-diet-induced metabolism disorder by improving glucose homeostasis in rats. PloS One12 (8), e0182830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182830

  • 38

    WangH.YangL. M.HuangL. (2011). [Clinical effects of qianggan capsule on the liver tissue pathology and PDGF-BB, TGF-beta1, TIMP-1, and MMP-1 factors in patients with chronic hepatitis B]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi31 (10), 13371340.

  • 39

    WangX. X.YeT.LiM.LiX.QiangO.TangC. W.et al. (2017). Effects of octreotide on hepatic glycogenesis in rats with high fat dietinduced obesity. Mol. Med. Rep.16 (1), 109118. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6586

  • 40

    YuX.XuL.ZhouQ.WuS.TianJ.PiaoC.et al. (2018). The Efficacy and Safety of the Chinese Herbal Formula, JTTZ, for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes with Obesity and Hyperlipidemia: A Multicenter Randomized, Positive-Controlled, Open-Label Clinical Trial. Int. J. Endocrinol.2018, 9519231. doi: 10.1155/2018/9519231

  • 41

    ZhangN.GengF.HuZ. H.LiuB.WangY. Q.LiuJ. C.et al. (2016a). Preliminary study of urine metabolism in type two diabetic patients based on GC-MS. Am. J. Transl. Res.8 (7), 28892896.

  • 42

    ZhangQ.YangH.AnJ.ZhangR.ChenB.HaoD. J. (2016b). Therapeutic Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Spinal Cord Injury: A Promising Supplementary Treatment in Future. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med.2016, 8958721. doi: 10.1155/2016/8958721

  • 43

    ZhouQ. H.ZhuY. D.ZhangF.SongY. Q.JiaS. N.ZhuL.et al. (2019). Interactions of drug-metabolizing enzymes with the Chinese herb Psoraleae Fructus. Chin. J. Nat. Med.17 (11), 858870. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(19)30103-7

  • 44

    ZhuM.LiM.ZhouW.YangY.LiF.ZhangL.et al. (2019). Qianggan extract improved nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by modulating lncRNA/circRNA immune ceRNA networks. BMC Complement Altern. Med.19 (1), 156. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2577-6

Summary

Keywords

Qianggan extract, hyperglycemia, glycometabolism, metabolomics, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Citation

Zhu M, Li M, Zhou W, Ge G, Zhang L and Ji G (2020) Metabolomic Analysis Identifies Glycometabolism Pathways as Potential Targets of Qianggan Extract in Hyperglycemia Rats. Front. Pharmacol. 11:671. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00671

Received

15 January 2019

Accepted

23 April 2020

Published

12 May 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Xijun Wang, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, China

Reviewed by

Wei Zhang, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau; Antonia Garcia, Universidad CEU-San Pablo, Spain; Takashi Matsui, University of Tsukuba, Japan

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Li Zhang, ; Guang Ji,

This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics