Impact Factor 4.225 | CiteScore 5.0
More on impact ›

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 30 April 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.653064

Systemic and Oral Immunogenicity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antigen Fused to Poly-Fc of Immunoglobulin G and Expressed in ΔXT/FT Nicotiana benthamiana Plants

www.frontiersin.orgNguyen-Quang-Duc Tien1,3, www.frontiersin.orgMoon-Sik Yang1,2, www.frontiersin.orgYong-Suk Jang1, www.frontiersin.orgTae-Ho Kwon2, www.frontiersin.orgRajko Reljic4* and www.frontiersin.orgMi-young Kim1,4*
  • 1Department of Molecular Biology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-Si, South Korea
  • 2NBM Inc., Wanjusandan 5-ro, Bongdong-eup, Wanju-Gun, Jeollabuk-do, South Korea
  • 3University of Sciences, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
  • 4Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s University of London, London, UK

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), a member of the Coronaviridae family has become increasingly probelmatic in the pig farming industry. Currently, there are no effective, globally applicable vaccines against PEDV. Here, we tested a recombinant PEDV vaccine candidate based on the expression of the core neutralising epitope (COE) of PEDV conjugated to polymeric immunoglobulin G scaffold (PIGS) in glycoengineered Nicotiana benthamiana plants. The biological activity of COE-PIGS was demonstrated by binding to C1q component of the complement system, as well as the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in vitro. The recombinant COE-PIGS induced humoral and cellular immune responses specific for PEDV after both systemic and mucosal vaccination. Altogether, the data indicated that PEDV antigen fusion to poly-Fc could be a promising vaccine platform against respiratory PEDV infection.

Introduction

Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world; approximately, 1.3 billion pigs are produced each year worldwide. The intensification and globalization of the swine industry has contributed to the emergence and global spread of pathogens of swine, driven in part by frequent movements of pigs, feed, and pork products at local, national, and international scales (Drew, 2011). For example, porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) spread from China to the United States (discovered in 2013) and thereafter to Canada and Mexico (in 2014) (Lee, 2015). Large-scale PED epidemics recurred through the pork industry and within 1 year, the virus had impacted ∼50% of US breeding herds, resulting in the deaths of at least seven million piglets (Ojkic et al., 2015; Goede and Morrison, 2016). Similarly, African swine fever (ASF) emerged in Eastern Europe from sub-Saharan Africa in 2007 and recently re-emerged in most of Asia including China, Philippines, Vietnam and East Timor in 2018–2019 (Blome et al., 2020). There are risks of the virus spreading also to other countries, as shown by its recent 2019 introduction to China (the world’s largest producer of pigs) and spread to neighboring countries such as North and South Korea. Cases in South Korea were speculated to have occurred by pigs crossing the demilitarized zone which is a 4 km-wide strip of land that is a buffer zone between North and South Korea. Despite extensive precautions following first recorded cases in North Korea in May 2019, South Korea reported its first case in September 2019 and has culled about 400,000 pigs after an outbreak began late last year (https://www.thepigsite.com/news/2020/10/south-korean-officials-cull-1-500-pigs-after-asf-outbreak). More than six million pigs have been culled overall in Asia (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-49916065). Finally, the potential importance of livestock pathogens for human public health was exemplified by the H1N1 “swine flu” pandemic in 2009, which originated from influenza A viruses circulating in pig populations (Smith et al., 2009). These examples highlight the need to build a global picture of pathogens of swine to enhance preparedness and understand patterns of emergence and spread. Thus, a versatile and efficient vaccine platform for swine diseases would be helpful to easily and quickly develop new vaccines against unknown or new pathogens which show a similar infection pathway.

Recently, PED caused by coronavirus infection has re-emerged, resulting in a substantial economic burden in pig industry. The first recorded case was in the United Kingdom in 1971 (Antas and Wozniakowski, 2019) and it subsequently spread to many European countries, followed by the current epidemic in Asian countries. Increasing problem is due to an appearance of new variants of PEDV with deletions/insertion, and several mutations in S (spike) 1 region (Lee et al., 2010; Lee, 2015; Jang et al., 2019). The reason for partial protection against PEDV with the current vaccine based on the CV777 strain could be explained by several sequence analyses. Zhao X. et al. have compared the sequences between their 55 isolated Chinese field strains (during 2011–2015) and foreign reference strains from GenBank. The S genes shared identity with CV777 (93.8–95.7%), CHGD-01 (94.6.0–98.3%), M98 (93.3–95.4%), attenuated DR13 (93.3–95.6%), and 83P-5_100th-passaged (93.7–96.0%) and shared nucleotide (deduced amino acid) homologies of 96.1–99.2% (95.1–99.5%) with United States/Missouri102/2013 (Zhao et al., 2017). New isolates from Korean PEDV epidemic strain, PED-CUP-B2014, were close to PEDVs currently circulating in many countries including the United States, and are distinct from many current vaccine strains (Park et al., 2018). We also compared the sequences of S protein between CV777 and various strains provided by NCBI including Korean (AAM19716.1), Chinese (AGN29320.1) and Vietnamese (ASU09581.1) isolates and the homology was 94, 95.9, 92.1 and 91.9%, respectively (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Summary of S protein of PEDV published in NCBI and UniProt.

Over the past several years, platform technologies have been developed that could make it possible for multiple vaccines to be rapidly produced from a single system. Here we suggest molecularly engineered adjuvant, named PIGS (Polymeric Immunoglobulin Scaffold), which we demonstrated previously to have an excellent in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo adjuvantic properties (Kim et al., 2017b; Kim et al., 2018; Webster et al., 2018). Thus, the vaccine comprises the antigen of choice genetically linked to the poly-Fc domain of modified IgG containing IgM-polymerisation C-terminal sequence, enabling its polymerization similar to pentameric IgM. This is the basis of its enhanced binding to complement and Fc gamma immunoglobulin receptors. We tested this concept for induction of systemic immunity against dengue infection in mice (Kim et al., 2018). For a swine PEDV vaccine, PIGS fused to PEDV antigen were tested by systemic and mucosal administration. Mucosal (oral) immunization would be highly desirable against the respiratory and enteric diseases caused by complex bacterial and viral agents, as the induced responses could potentially stop the infection before it can spread.

In this study, COE epitope antigen of the S1 protein of PEDV, which is responsible for inducing neutralizing antibodies (Chang et al., 2002; Chang et al., 2019; Ho et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2008), was used to test the poly-Fc based vaccine against swine infection. The COE and PIGS fusion protein were transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana plants and both systemic and oral immunogenicity were analyzed in the mouse model.

Materials and Methods

Gene Construction for Plant Expression Vector

The core neutralizing epitope (COE) composed of 139 amino acid (aa) length (aa position 499 to 637 of PEDV strain CV777 S gene; UniProtKB-Q91AV1) was selected to develop PEDV vaccine and synthesized with the plant codon optimization sequences. To verify enhanced immunogenicity, an antigen delivery molecule, a mouse IgG2a Fc based polymeric IgG scaffold (mPIGS) has been fused to COE, which had demonstrated an increased antigen specific antibody response and self-adjuvancity in our previous dengue vaccine study (Kim et al., 2017b). The mPIGS gene fragment was cloned into pGEM T-easy vector (Promega, United States) by PCR amplification method using the plasmid pMPIGS as the DNA template, with gene-specific primers 5′-gcg​gta​ccG​CTT​CAT​CTA​CAA​AA-3′ (forward) and 5′-gc gag​ctc​TTA​GTA​GCA​AGT​GCC-3′ (reverse). The PCR conditions were as follows: 30 cycles of PCR amplification (DNA strand denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and complementary strand synthesis at 72°C for 40 s) and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR product was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis (COSMO Genetech, South Korea). The gene encoding mPIGS was then fused with COE using KpnI and SacI restriction enzyme sites in the intermediate vector. To construct plant expression vector, the fusion gene (COE-mPIGS, 1,203 kb) was PCR amplified with forward and reverse primers (5′-TTT​TGG​TCT​CAAGG​TGCT​TCA​TCT​ACA​AAA-3′; 5′- TTT​TGG​TCT​CAAAG​CTTA​GTA​GCA​AGT​GCC-3′, respectively) and then cloned into MagnIcon® transient expression vector, pICH31070 (kindly, provided from Y Gleba, Icon Genetics, Germany). The recombinant plasmid was designated pMYK-T10 and transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3010 using electroporation method (Wise et al., 2006).

Agroinfiltration for a Transient Expression in Plants

To increase binding avidity to low affinity Fcɤ receptors and CD16a in particular, COE-mPIGS construct was expressed in delta-XF variant tobacco cells which produce only residual xylose and fucose glycans (Kim et al., 2015; Strasser et al., 2008). The ΔXT/FT N. benthamiana seeds (kindly, provided from Strasser R., Austria) were germinated in the greenhouse under the conditions of 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 25 ± 0.5°C. For transient expression of COE-mPIGS protein, pro-vector expression system was employed and Agrobacterium cells (strain GV3010) harboring pICH20155 (5′ pro-vector), plasmid pMYK-T10 (3’ pro-vector) and pICH14011 (integrase vector), respectively, were co-infiltrated into 6-weeks old plantlets. All procedures were described in our previous report (Huy and Kim, 2017). Also, LBA404 agrobacterium harboring plasmid encoding J chain, which links together monomeric units in secretory IgA (SIgA) or pentameric IgM in nature (Johansen et al., 2000) was also co-infiltrated, to improve multimerization by forming a disulfide bridge with the mu-tail piece at the C-terminal end of mPIGS (Yoo et al., 1999). Briefly, three agrobacteria (described above) were grown in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) medium containing 50 μg/L kanamycin and 100 μg/L rifampicin for in 100 ml culture at 28°C for 2 days, respectively. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 5 min and suspensed in 5 L of MES infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgSO4, pH 5.5, 200 µM Acetosyringone). The bacterial suspension solution was adjusted to OD600 value = 0.3 and pre-incubated for 2 h at room temperature before agroinfiltration. Vacuum-infiltration was applied to plants immersed in MES infiltration buffer. The bacterial cells penetrated into the leaves by slowly releasing the air pressure after 2 min holding at vacuum 0.1 mPa. The infiltrated plants were further grown in greenhouse under 16 h continuous light per day, and their leaves were harvested at day 6 post infiltration for subsequent experiments.

Protein Extraction and Purification

To extract COE-mPIGS protein, the infiltrated leaves were homogenised by blender with double volumes of chilled PBS buffer. The crude protein extracts were filtered through two layers of Miracloth (Calbiochem) and centrifuged twice at 14,000 rpm for 30 min in a Beckman centrifuge (AvantiTM J25, United States). The recombinant COE-mPIGS protein in the supernatant was detected by Western blot analysis prior to purification. The supernatant was filtered through 0.22 µm filter before loading onto a protein A agarose affinity column (Sigma) previously equilibrated with the binding buffer. The column was washed with five volumes of washing buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0). The bound antibodies were eluted with elution buffer (0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 2.7) and pH immediately neutralized by addition of 1 M Tris base (pH unadjusted). The recombinant protein elution fractions were concentrated by Amicon Ultra- Centrifugal Filter Unit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and dialyzed using Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBS buffer before quantification by optical density method, at 280 nm. Aliquots of the protein were stored at −20°C for further experiments.

Immunoblot Analysis

An aliquot of protein extracts containing 40 µg of TSP, along with prestained molecular weight markers, were separated by 8% (non-boiled condition) or 10% (boiled condition) SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad, United States) at 120 V for 2 h in Tris-glycine buffer, pH 8.3 (25 mM Tris, 250 mM glycine and 0.1% SDS). The separated protein bands were transferred onto Hybond C membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, United States) in transfer buffer (50 mM Tris, 40 mM glycine, and 20% methanol) using a mini-transblot apparatus (Bio-Rad, United States) at 130 mA for 2 h. To prevent non-specific antibody reactions, membrane was blocked with 10% non-fat milk powder in TBST buffer (Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20) with gentle agitation on a rotary shaker at 20 rpm overnight. For detection of mPIGS, the membrane was incubated with anti-mouse heavy chain specific antibodies conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma A3438, United States) diluted (1:7,000) in TBST buffer containing 0.3% non-fat dry milk. For detection of COE, mouse anti-COE antiserum (diluted 1:5,000) was used. The membrane was then washed three times with TBST buffer and incubated for 2 h with rabbit anti-mouse light chain specific antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma SAB3701215, United States), diluted (1:7,000) in TBST buffer. The membranes was washed twice with TBST buffer and once with TMN buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 9.5, 5 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl). The colour was developed using premixed BCIP/NBT solution (Sigma, United States).

C1q Complement Binding Assay

The first step in activation of the classical complement pathway is the binding of C1q protein to antibodies-antigen complexes. To better define one of the biological functions of COE-mPIGS, we compared the C1q binding activity of these immune complex-like molecules, with monomeric mouse IgG serving as a negative control, by ELISA. The plates were coated with 1 µg/well of human complement C1q (Calbiochem) in 100 µl of coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3; 35 mM NaHCO3 pH 9.6) at 4°C for overnight. After washing three times with PBST buffer (Phosphate buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.4), the plates were blocked with 300 µL/well of 1% BSA in PBS buffer for 2 hat 37°C. The COE-mPIGS purified protein (10 μg/ml) were 2-fold serially diluted in PBS buffer containing 0.1% BSA and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The mouse IgG antibody (Sigma) was used as the negative control. After washing three times with PBST buffer, the plates were incubated with 100 µl of anti-mouse IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (1:7,000 dilution, Sigma A3562, St. Louis, MO, United States) as the secondary antibody, for 2 hat 37°C. Finally, 100 µl of phosphatase substrates (Sigma, S0942) was added per well for 15–20 min at room temperature and optical density measured at 405 nm in SUNRISE (Tecan, United Kingdom, CT) ELISA reader.

Fcγ Receptor Binding Assay

Binding of antibody-antigen complexes to Fc receptors activates effector cells, triggering activities such as phagocytosis, inflammatory mediators release, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Therefore, we tested the ability of binding of COE-mPIGS to Fc receptors present on J774 macrophage cells (ATCC), by flow cytometry. J774 cells (ATCC) were cultured in complete RPMI medium (2 mM L-glutamine, 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) in 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. The cells growing at 80% confluency were detached with dissociation buffer (Invitrogen), centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 min and resuspend in binding buffer (PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.05% of sodium azide). 100 μg/ml of COE-mPIGS purified protein was added to 1 million cells in 100 μlcell suspension and incubated on ice for 2 h. Nonspecific binding was minimized by washing thrice with 3 ml of binding buffer. Cells were then incubated with 7.5 µl of anti-mouse IgG-FITC antiserum (the Binding Site) as the secondary antibody, for 1 h on ice. After washing, cells were resuspended in 500 µl of binding buffer and analyzed for green fluorescence on a Becton-Dickinson flow cytometer. Ten thousand cells were counted, and results expressed as the percentage of cells positive for FITC staining. Secondary antibody alone and unstained cells were used for background staining.

Systemic Injection of Mice

All animal work was performed according to the requirements and guidelines of the Korean Animal Protection Act (APA) of 2008 by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, and the Laboratory Animal Act (LAA) of 2009 by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Republic of Korea. The Five-week-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from Dong Yang Oriental Company (Korea) and randomly distributed into four groups for two independent immunization experiments. Mice were allowed at least 1 week to acclimate before start of vaccination. To test antigen immunogenicity, subcutaneous (s.c.) injection at the scruff of the neck under isoflurane anaesthesia was performed three times, at 3 weeks intervals, as described in Figure 4A. The mice were subcutaneously administered with 10 µg of bacterial COE (LSP removed) or 10 µg CoE-mPIGS protein, with or without 5 µg cholera toxin-CT (Sigma, C8052). Antigen combined with a commercial CT (Sigma) adjuvant or just PBS were used for comparison purposes. To analyze antigen-specific antibody responses from the mice sera, the blood was collected at weeks 3, 6, and 8 (end of the experiment) and sera prepared as described in Jespersgaard et al. (Jespersgaard et al., 1999). At the end of experiment, splenocytes were isolated to quantitate numbers of IgG-secreting cells (SCs) by ELISPOT or to perform lymphocyte proliferation assays as described previously (Kim et al., 2016).

Oral Immunization of Mice

To test for oral immunogenicity, dried plant leaf powder from glyco-engineered uninfiltrated ΔXT/FT plants or agroinfiltrated plants containing 100 μg of COE-mPIGS, was re-suspended in 1 ml PBS buffer and weekly fed to five mice in each group by gavage needle (Figure 5A), for 6 weeks in total. The material expressing COE-mPIGS was used with or without Saponin Quillaja sp adjuvant (2.5 mg/mouse, Sigma, S4521) and bacterial recombinant COE protein alone and PBS buffer were used as control groups in the study. Mice were starved for 8 h before oral gavage for improved retention of the administered material. Blood and fecal samples were collected before immunization and 3 days after feeding at weeks 4 and 5, as previously described (Huy et al., 2016). Sera were recovered from coagulated blood by centrifugation at 13,200 rpm for 10 min and stored at −70 C, while fecal samples (approximately 200 mg) were suspended in 1 ml of PBS buffer supplemented with 0.01% sodium azide, to inhibit action of bacteria. The fecal extracts were collected by centrifugation at 13,200 rpm for 25 min and used for detection of sIgA antibody responses.

Detection of Antigen Specific Antibody Responses

The ELISA was used to determine the specific serum antibody responses in immunized mice. The ELISA plates (96-well) were coated with 10 μg/μl of bacterial antigen (bCOE) in coating buffer and incubated at 37 C overnight. The plates were then washed thrice with PBST buffer (PBS buffer with 0.05% Tween-20) and blocked with 300 µl/well of PBS buffer containing 1% BSA at 37 C, for 2 h. Subsequently, the sera (starting dilution 1:100) and fecal extracts (starting dilution 1:4) were 2-fold serially diluted (in PBS buffer containing 0.1% BSA), and following 2 h incubation at 37 C, washed thrice with PBST buffer. 100 µl per well of 1:7,000 diluted anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) or anti-mouse IgA (Sigma) conjugated to alkaline phosphatase was then added and incubated for further 2 h at 37°C, followed by washing thrice with PBST buffer. For colour development, 100 µl/well of alkaline phosphatase p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate system (Sigma, S0942-100 TAB) in 10% diethanolamine, 0.1% MgCl2, 0.02% sodium azide, pH 9.8, was added and plates incubated in the dark for 20 min, at room temperature. The optical density was measured at 405 nm using the SUNRISE reader (Tecan, United Kingdom), and endpoint titres were determined as 2xfold about background.

ELISPOT Analysis

The Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot assay (ELISpot) was conducted to quantify antigen-specific antibody-secreting B cells (ASC). The PVDF membranes of ELISpot plate were activated by incubating in 35% ethanol for 10 min at room temperature. The plate was washed thrice with PBS buffer to remove residue ethanol, and 500 ng/well of bacterial antigen (bCOE) added, in PBS buffer at 4°C overnight. Following washing, 200 µl of complete RPMI containing 10% FBS was added and plates incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 1 h, to prevent non-specific binding. Splenocytes were isolated from mice 10 days after final immunization using Percoll density gradients. Viable splenocytes were counted by trypan blue method (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were diluted in complete RPMI medium to 1 × 106, 5 × 105, and 1 × 105 cells/well and then cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 2 days. After removal of unbound cells by washing, anti-mouse IgG alkaline phosphatase (Sigma) was added and following 2 h incubation at 37°C, the cells were washed three times as before. ASC were visualized by addition of BCIP/NBT phosphatase substrate (Sigma) and colour spots counted under microscope and computer.

T-Cell Proliferation Assay

T-cell proliferation ability of splenocytes from immunized mice was determined by the [3H] thymidine incorporation method. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from the spleens of immunized mice at 10-days after the final immunization. Splenocytes suspensions were filtered using 70-µm cell strainer and separated by percoll 40–70% gradient. The cells were washed three times with PBS buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) and re-suspended in complete RPMI medium containing 10% FBS (FBS; Invitrogen), 1 M HEPES, 1 M sodium pyruvate, 2 mM mercaptoethanol, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1 × 106, 5 × 105 and 1 × 105 in 100 µL of complete RPMI medium, and 10 µg of bCOE added (or medium alone as the negative control). After 48 h incubation at 37°C in incubator 5% CO2, cells were pulsed with 0.5 µCi of [3H]-thymidine deoxyribose (TdR) (Amersham Life Science, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) per well, for an additional 18 h. Using a 96-well cell harvester (Inotech, Dottikon, Switzerland), the cells were collected and assessed for tritium incorporation using a liquid scintillation counter (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT, United States). Stimulation indices were calculated by dividing the tritium incorporation (counts per minute) in cells treated with cognate antigens by the incorporation in control cells treated with PBS.

Data Analysis

Representative data from at least two or multiple experiments are expressed as the means of replicate tests ±SD. The statistically significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s for group-to-group comparisons, with values of p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using IPMS® SPSS® statistics package, version 22.

Results

Gene Construction and Agro-Infiltration

A causative pathogen of PED, coronavirus-like agent (CV777) was discovered by Belgium scientists in 1978 (Lee, 2015). Although the current vaccine based on the CV777 strain shows only partial protection, we took the epitope from this strain primarily to test our vaccine platform as a proof-of-concept, that immunogenicity can be enhanced by molecular means. The neutralizing epitope COE sequence that corresponds to the 15 kDa portion of the S protein was genetically fused to poly-Fc gene construct from mouse IgG (mPIGS) (Kim et al., 2017b). Both antigen and mPIGS genes were synthesized with high frequency of codon usage in plants. To produce recombinant PIGS fusion protein, pro-vector which was developed by Icon Genetics, was employed as the plant expression vector (Gleba et al., 2005). The linear DNA of COE-mPIGS gene inserted into Bsa I restriction enzyme site within 3′ pro-vector was used to express the construct transiently in tobacco cells. Tobacco leaves were agro-infiltrated by combining the expression vector with a 5’ pro-vector for apoplast targeting of protein in the cells, and the vector for expression of integrase (Figure 1A). All through the expression, LBA4404 agrobacterium harboring plasmid encoding J chain, which links together monomeric units in secretory IgA (SIgA) or pentameric IgM in nature (Yoo et al., 1999), was also co-infiltrated, to improve multimerization by forming a disulfide bridge with the mu-tail piece at the C-terminal end of mPIGS (Davis and Shulman, 1989; Frutiger et al., 1992; Fazel et al., 1997). The single chain of COE-mPIGS may be assembled as a homodimer or multimers, like a natural IgM antibody, leading to enhanced Fc-receptor mediated functions (Figure 1B). For expression, ΔXT/FT glyco-engineered tobacco plants (Strasser et al., 2008) were used to produce glycan-optimized COE-mPIGS.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Vector construction for plant expression of COE-mPIGS and a schematic diagram of poly-Fc platform (A) the structure of S protein of PEDV and plant expression vector: three vectors were used to produce COE-PIGS simultaneously. pMYKT10, 3′ pro-vector containing COE-mPIGS gene; pICH20155, 5′ pro-vector containing apoplast signal peptide sequence; and pICH14011 vector for expression of the integrase. LB and RB, left border and right border of T-DNA; P-Act2, Arabidopsis actin 2 promoter; P-hsp, Arabidopsis heat shock protein hsp 81.1 promoter; NOS, nos terminator; 3′NTR, 3′ nontranslated regions of TMV; MP, movement protein; Apo, apoplast targeting pre-sequence; int, intron; AttP and AttB, recombination sites; NLS, nuclear localization signal; T, terminator. (B) Homodimeric structure of COE-PIGS presenting biologically active sites. COE, antigen of PEDV; Fcγ, Fc gamma chain based on mouse IgG2a; µ tp, µ tail piece of human IgM; PIGS, Polymeric IgG Scaffold. The process of polymerization from a single chain is shown in a lower diagram. Polymers bind to both high and low affinity Fc receptors (FcγI, FcγII, and FcγIII) embedded in antigen presenting cell (APC) resulting in enhancement of the immune responses, while monomeric IgG binds to only high affinity Fc receptor (FcγI). Polymers can be denatured into single chain under reducing conditions.

Expression of COE-mPIGS in N.benthamiana Leaves

For the protein assay, the tobacco leaves infiltrated with A. tumefaciens harboring three pro-vector components, with or without J chain construct, were extracted in PBS buffer and analyzed. Immunoblot analysis was conducted to detect the COE and mPIGS portions in protein extracts using anti-COE polyclonal sera or anti-mouse IgG heavy chain specific antibodies, respectively. Samples of 40 micrograms of protein were extracted at 2, 4, and 6 days post infiltration (dpi) and boiled before separating on SDS-PAGE gel. Following transfer, immunoblot membranes were probed by anti-IgG antibody under non-reducing conditions, showing varying sizes of COE-mPIGS, ranging from approximately 50–53, 100 kDa and above 170 kDa, possibly representing the single chains (S), homodimers (D) and polymers (P) (Figure 2A). There were significantly more polymeric forms in samples from 6 dpi compared to 2 or 4 dpi, and importantly, with co-expression with J chain compared to without J chain (Figure 2A left two panels). It was not possible to determine the exact molecular weight of the polymeric fraction or its proportion in the preparation, but as Figure 2A indicates, the inclusion of J chain markedly enhanced the proportion of dimers and especially polymers, suggesting their higher efficiency assembly, into likely pentamers of approximately 500 kDa, while in the absence of J chain the polymers likely represent hexamers of approximately 600 kDa. Under reducing conditions, COE-mPIGS fusion protein was dissociated into a single chain with molecular weight of approximately 53 kDa, as detected by anti-mouse IgG antibody and anti-COE polyclonal sera (Figure 2A right two panels). The single chain of COE-mPIGS calculated by ProtParam tools (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) is 44.3 kDa, but that excludes 4 potential N-glycans. There was no cross-reactivity in protein extracts from non-infiltrated ΔXT/FT N. benthamiana plants used as a negative control. The recombinant COE purified from bacteria (bCOE) and a commercial IgG antibody were used as positive controls, yielding 15 and 55 kDa protein bands under reducing conditions, respectively (Figure 2A right two panels).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Expression of COE-mPIGS protein in tobacco (A) Immunoblot analysis of COE-PIGS co-expressed without/with J chain: the protein extracts from infiltrated and non-infiltrated leaf tissues were analyzed by probing with anti-mouse IgG gamma chain specific or anti-COE polyclonal antibodies under non-reducing and reducing conditions. PC, commercial mouse IgG or COE recombinant protein produced in E. coli used as positive controls; NC, non-infiltrated protein extract used as the negative control; lanes 2, 4, and 6, protein extracts from the harvested leaves at 2, 4, and 6 days post-infiltration (dpi). Molecular weight markers are shown on the left. (B) Indirect ELISA probing by anti-mouse IgG gamma chain specific antibody. The level of expression (approximately 0.7% of total soluble protein) was estimated by comparing to commercial IgG protein by ELISA.

The amount of COE-mPIGS protein in the leaf tissues was measured using quantitative sandwich ELISA (Figure 2B left). Known amounts of IgG2a were used to generate the standard curve. The expression level of COE-mPIGS was approximately 0.74% of total soluble protein (Figure 2B right). There was no non-specific antibody binding in protein extracts from non-infiltrated leaves used as a negative control.

Protein Purification

For protein purification, the complex COE-mPIGS with J chain was transiently expressed in ΔXT/FT N. benthamiana for 6 days and the leaves were collected. The recombinant COE-mPIGS protein was purified from protein extracts using protein A/G affinity chromatography method and the eluted fractions (E1-E3) were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 3A, purification products were shown to be approximately 53 kDa (single, S), 110 kDa (dimer, D) and above 170 kDa (polymers, P) protein bands. The commercial BSA (Sigma) was used as protein standard for molecular weight comparison.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Purification of protein and a functional characterization assay (A) Recombinant COE-mPIGS was purified from plant extracts using protein A/G affinity chromatography methods. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions and visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Lane BSA, bovine serum albumin; lane E1-E3: fractions of eluted protein. Pre-stained protein molecular weight standards and polymers (P), homodimer (D), and single chain (S) shown on the left and right sides of the figure. (B) C1q complement binding by ELISA shown as 2-fold serial dilutions of COE-mPIGS (5 μg/ml). The protein extracts from wild-type plant were used as the negative control. (C) Fc gamma receptor binding in J774 cells by FACS analysis. The COE-mPIGS binding histogram was overlaid to that obtained for mouse IgG2a antibody or secondary antibody alone, used as negative controls.

Characterization of Functional COE-mPIGS Protein

Antigen-antibody complex (immune complex)-mediated activation of the complement system, and IgG Fc receptors (FcɤRs) mediated uptake, are important defence mechanisms mediated by innate and adaptive immune responses. Thus, the recombinant COE-mPIGS were tested for binding to C1q complement component and to Fc gamma receptor-bearing antigen presenting cells (APCs). As shown in Figure 3B, the COE-mPIGS bound to C1q in dose-dependent manner confirming the presence of polymeric forms of COE-mPIGS. Similarly, FcɤR targeting by COE-mPIGS revealed a significantly increased level of binding in mouse J774 macrophages, compared to secondary mouse IgG-FITC antibody only. In contrast, the monomeric IgG used as an internal control showed much less binding to both C1q and FcɤR (Figures 3B,C).

Systemic and Oral Immunogenicity of COE-mPIGS

To test for systemic immune responses, mice were subcutaneously immunized with bCOE or PBS buffer or COE-mPIGS with or without adjuvant (bacterial CT), on three separate occasions (Figure 4A). The serum IgG antibody immune responses were analyzed after weeks 3 and 6 by ELISA. As shown in Figure 4B, mice given only bacterial antigen bCOE showed low IgG antibody response, while mice immunized with COE-mPIGS with or without adjuvant showed high-levels of IgG. The endpoint antibody titers were detected at approximately 1:51,200 and 1:204,800 in groups immunized with COE-mPIGS alone and COE-mPIGS with bCT, respectively (Figure 4B). As expected, there were no anti-COE IgG responses in mice which received PBS buffer only, as the control. Furthermore, COE-mPIGS induced higher frequency of antibody secreting B cells, compared to antigen alone (Figure 4C, left), and this was further enhanced by the presence of the CT adjuvant. Similarly, we observed stronger antigen-specific T cell proliferation of splenocytes from mice immunized with COE-mPIGS compared to antigen alone, and like for B cells, this was further enhanced by the adjuvant (Figure 4C, right).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Mouse immune responses induced by systemic injection (A) Schedule for immunization and sample collection. The BALB/c mice were randomly distributed into four groups. Mice were subcutaneously injected with PBS only, or with 10 µg of the purified COE-mPIGS protein alone or with 5 µg of bacterial cholera toxin (bCT) as adjuvant. The blood samples were collected at 3 and 6 weeks post-immunization. (B) Detection of COE-specific serum IgG. COE-mPIGS and COE-mPIGS + bCT significantly enhanced IgG antibody responses after boosting, while COE and PBS induced only a low level or no response, respectively. The endpoint antibody titers were detected at approximately 1:51,200 and 1:204,800 for COE-mPIGS alone and COE-mPIGS with bCT, respectively. The results were shown as the mean of triplicate measurements ±SD of the 1:100 dilution (left panel), and serial 2-fold dilutions starting from 1:100 dilution (right panel). (C) Cellular immune responses. Spot forming units after bacterial COE antigen stimulation in pooled (n = 4) cultures were detected by ELISpot assay (left panel) and the results shown as the mean values of the number of antibody-secreting cells from triplicate cultures. bCOE protein induced only low-frequency antibody-secreting cells, while COE-mPIGS and COE-mPIGS adjuvanted with bCT induced high-levels of the antibody-secreting cells. T cell proliferation was assessed by [3H] thymidine incorporation assay (right panel). Stimulation index was calculated by dividing the CMP (counts per minute) of Ag-stimulated cultures by CPM of control cultures from three separate experiments. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0005, by Tukey’s test.

To test for oral immunogenicity, sera and fecal extracts were obtained from mice immunized with PBS, bCOE, and COE-mPIGS alone or COE-mPIGS with tor without he saponin adjuvant, and analyzed for COE specific IgG and IgA antibodies. Saponin was used in this case as it is generally considered to be a good oral adjuvant (Cox et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2015; Pickering et al., 2006; Rajput et al., 2007; Sjolander and Cox, 1998; Sun et al., 2009). Both serum IgG and fecal IgA against COE were detected in mice immunized with COE-mPIGS alone and when combined with saponin, at 4 and 5 weeks (Figure 5B). While endpoint titres were not determined for fecal IgA, based on single dilution measurement and internal ELISA normalization, they could be inferred to be significantly lower that serum IgG, at an estimated 1:1,000–1:2,000. Interestingly, COE-mPIGS with saponin induced only marginally enhanced serum IgG and fecal IgA antibody responses, but this was not statistically different to COE-mPIGS alone. While this was surprising, similar results were also reported in another study of the oral immunogenicity of the tEDIII-Co1 dengue antigen expressed in rice calli (Kim and Kim, 2019), suggesting that in our hands at least, saponin did not exert strong gut adjuvanticity. However, taken together, our data show that COE-mPIGS alone could induce both systemic and mucosal antigen specific immune responses, and that combining these routes of delivery could be used to effectively immunize against a gut pathogen like PEDV.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Mouse immune responses induced by oral administration (A) Protocol for immunization and sampling (B) Detection of COE-specific serum IgG (top two panels) and fecal IgA (bottom two panels) in pooled samples for each group (left panels) and the individual mice (right panels), in 1:100 diluted serum and 1:4 diluted fecal extracts. COE-mPIGS and COE-mPIGS + Saponin induced significant IgG and IgA antibody titres after boosting. Only background responses were detected for COE and PBS. The results are shown as the mean of triplicate measurements ±SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, by Tukey’s test.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated enhanced immunogenicity of an antigen against PEDV by molecular engineering of adjuvanticity. The neutralizing epitope derived from CV777 strain, COE, was fused to the polymeric Fc scaffold of IgG, as a new and promising vaccine platform for induction of both systemic and mucosal immune responses via the oral route. Our choice of antigen was the COE epitope containing sequence, which was demonstrated recently to induce PEDV neutralizing antibodies in mice when expressed in plants in native trimeric form (Ho et al., 2020). However, we emphasize that our primary aim was to develop a suitable vaccine platform against this and similar veterinary pathogens, rather than a ready-made vaccine, as that would require further modifications, including inclusion of other portions of the S protein as well as different variants of the virus.

PEDV belongs to the family Coronaviridae, genus Alphacoronavirus relating to transmissible gastroenteritis virus or transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus (TGEV). There is no cross-protection between TGE and PEDV even though both are Coronaviruses and show similar clinical signs. It only infects pigs and does not relate to human diseases caused by beta-coronavirus such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2 or COVID-19). PEDV is one of the major causes of high morbidity and mortality in piglets worldwide and currently, inactivated and live attenuated vaccines have been extensively used, but with limited success only. To compound this, the high frequency of recombination events in coronaviruses may result in the generation of novel viruses with high genetic diversity, which could invoke unpredictable changes in virulence during infections (Zhao et al., 2017; Ou et al., 2020). Thus, the emergence of highly virulent strains and the recurrent outbreaks even in vaccinated farms highlight the need for more effective vaccines. Recently, Park et al., demonstrated that the newly isolated PEDV strain conferred critical passive immune protection to pigs against epidemic PEDV infection (Park et al., 2018). An alternative form of immunization against PEDV might be a mucosal vaccine, which could control the infection at the sites of pathogen replication in porcine small intestinal villous epithelial cells or enterocytes (Lee, 2015). Yuchen Li et al. demonstrated that PEDV could cause typical diarrhea in piglets through a nasal spray (Li et al., 2018). That provides evidence for possible airborne transmission and subsequent gastrointestinal dissemination and is useful in facilitating strategies for PEDV prevention.

Generally, the S protein of coronavirus consists of S1 and S2 domains which mediate attachment and membrane fusion, respectively. The N-terminal region of the S protein, S1 domain (amino acid position 231-733 in CV777, NCBI assess no. NP 598310.1; 234-736 in Korean isolate, 2005, NCBI assess no. AAM19716.1; 235-737 in 85-7 mutant, NCBI assess no. AST13221.1; 234-736 in HUA-PED96 Vietnam isolate, NCBI assess no. ASU09581.1; 230-732 in Chinese isolate, 2013, NCBI assess no. AGN29320.1), is important for recognizing the Porcine aminopeptidase N (pAPN) receptor, which is predominantly expressed on the surface of epithelial cells of small intestine, and has been identified as the cellular receptor for PEDV (Nam and Lee, 2010). The summary of S protein features of PEDV published in NCBI and UniProt was included in Table 1. Many of subunit vaccine candidates against coronaviruses have been developed using S and S1 domain, or host cell receptor binding domain such as ACE2 (aa 321-536, NCBI assess no. MN908947, NC_045512, MN985325, MN988669) against SARS or SARS-CoV2 (Chakraborti et al., 2005; He et al., 2004; He et al., 2006; Ou et al., 2020). Thus, vaccine strategy targeting to pAPN receptor binding domain could be used to protect against PEDV even though S glycoprotein of PEDV is not cleaved into S1 and S2, in contrast to beta- and gammacoronaviruses split by furin enzyme located between the two domains (Ou et al., 2020). An alternative antigen to induce neutralizing antibodies suggested by Chang et al., is called S1D fragment (residues 636–789) in CV777 strain, located between S1 and S2 domain, and consisting of two linear epitopes. Anti-S1D5 (residues 744–759) and S1D6 (residues 756–771) antibodies reacted with the native S protein of PEDV. Furthermore, two core epitopes on S1D5 (748YSNIGVCK755) and S1D6 (764LQDGQVKI771) were detected by Pepscan analysis in a previous study (Sun et al., 2008). More recent studies, however, identified several neutralizing monoclonal antibodies all binding to the S2 domain of the spike protein (Okda et al., 2017). In fact, in that study, the S2 specific monoclonal antibodies were also more neutralizing than those targeting the S1 domain. This is interesting as it may suggest that the S2 domain should be included in the antigen moiety of any new PEDV vaccine, though it is not clear if natural infection also induces predominantly S2 targeted antibodies. This is not uncommon for viruses as for example, there are many strongly neutralizing antibodies against the domain three of the dengue E glycoprotein (Crill and Roehrig, 2001; Shrestha et al., 2010) and yet, natural infection does not induce such antibodies (Wahala et al., 2009; Williams et al., 2012).

In this study, we employed poly-Fc of IgG as an antigen delivery platform, with enhanced avidity of binding to both high and low affinity Fc gamma receptors (Kim et al., 2017b; Kim et al., 2018; Webster et al., 2018). This is an improvement on IgM which despite being polymeric (pentamer or hexamer naturally) displays low binding affinity for its receptor (Vollmers and Brandlein, 2006), or monomeric IgG which binds to only high affinity Fc gamma receptor. This feature of poly Fc fusion as a vaccine is expected to increase the efficiency of antigen-presentation compared to uptake of a single antigen by the immune cells, as schematically shown in Figure 1B. Also, binding to complement component (C1q) in an antigen-antibody immune complex manner could further enhance the adjuvant effect by activating complement cascade in vivo (Dempsey et al., 1996). In our previous studies, those functions were demonstrated using antigens of human diseases such as dengue (Kim et al., 2017b; Kim et al., 2018) and tuberculosis (TB) (Webster et al., 2018). Although the initial attempts at generating Fc fusions showed only partial success (Mekhaiel et al., 2011), further modifications and improvements of the original molecule suggested by Smith et al. (1995), as described for our polymeric platform, have enabled the application of this concept as an efficient vaccine delivery system.

Here we utilized the poly-Fc technology to develop a swine PEDV vaccine platform through either systemic injection or mucosal (oral) administration, which is relevant and potentially applicable to many enteric or respiratory diseases, such as TGEV, ASFV, Influenza A Virus in Swine (IAV-S), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRSV) and foot-and-mouth (FMDV) caused by Coronaviridae, Asfarviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Togaviridae and Picornaviridae virus, respectively. These diseases are a significant economic burden in pork industry worldwide, and in need of better control through vaccination. Our results showed that both antigen-specific humoral antibody and cellular responses could be induced by either subcutaneous injection (Figure 4) or oral delivery (Figure 5) of COE-PIGS. Furthermore, in our other experiments (data not shown), the recombinant S1D fusion PIGS (S1D-PIGS) protein administrated to mice intranasally induced robust anti-S1D IgG and IgA antibodies in sera and bronchoalveolar lavage and a balanced Th1/Th2 cellular responses in the spleen, thus further strengthening the evidence for the utility of the mucosal route. As a further proof of evidence for this, we previously demonstrated that crude extracts containing antigens expressed in rice cells, including fragment ApxII from Actinobacillus pleuropneumonia and COE–Co1 fusion protein for PEDV, when given to mice by intranasal or oral route, also elicited antigen-specific IgG and IgA in spleen and Peyer’s patches (Huy et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2017a). Likewise, transgenic rice whole cells expressing a dengue antigen fused to cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) or enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Heat-Labile Toxin B Subunit, when delivered orally, also induced systemic and mucosal immune responses (Kim et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2016; Kim and Kim, 2019). Finally, another PEDV antigen (S1D), when fused to CTB and expressed in tobacco cells also induced serum IgG and fecal IgA responses against both CTB and S1D, following oral immunization (Huy et al., 2016). However, those mucosal responses were induced when antigen was fused to CTB (well known as a general/mucosal adjuvant) or Co1 ligand (M-cell target peptide of epithelial cells), while a proof of oral immunogenicity by PIGS fusion molecules alone has been demonstrated for the first time in this study.

The limitation of our study is that polymerization of COE-PIGS in plants cannot be controlled, although it can be significantly enhanced by inclusion of the J chain. IgM can form both hexamers and pentamers, with the latter being facilitated by the J chain. We indirectly conclude but provide no experimental evidence, that most of the generated COE-PIGS may also be pentameric. Functionally though, both pentamers and hexamers (and even dimers) would retain the capacity for improved binding to the FC-gamma receptors and enhanced antigen presentation. Another limitation of our study is that, while our primary aim was to validate the immunogenicity of this new vaccine platform, we were unable to perform virus antibody neutralization assays, or the in vivo pathogenic challenge studies, as the mouse is not a suitable model for PEDV. Likewise, we cannot infer that the antigen dosing in mice would be replicated in pigs, as these are much larger animals. However, unlike drug treatments, vaccine scale up in different-sized hosts does not follow the same principles, and the optimal dose for pigs would have to be established experimentally.

Going forward, and to address the above limitations, we now intend to test this vaccination concept in pigs (the target animal), by replacing the mouse Poly-Fc with that from swine and expressing it in plants. Further modifications will include inclusion of additional portions of the S protein. While this vaccine candidate can be expressed in one of the more conventional expression systems, such as mammalian cells (Kim et al., 2017b), we propose plants as this emerging biotechnology has shown considerable promise, with several plant-expressed pharmaceuticals in human clinical trials. Success examples of this technology are illustrated by the deployment of the ZMapp antibody during the 2014 Ebola epidemic (Lyon et al., 2014) and the phase II clinical trial of a quadrivalent seasonal influenza VLP vaccine by Medicago Inc. (Pillet et al., 2019). In particular, animal vaccine development may benefit the most from this technology, due to somewhat less stringent GMP requirements and the associated costs of production, with the attractive possibility of delivering the vaccine in edible form, through feeding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Local Ethics Committee, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.

Author Contributions

M-YK and N-Q-DT conceived, designed and performed the overall study. M-SY, T-HK, and Y-SJ contributed toward experimental designs. RR helped with data interpretation and analysis. N-Q-DT, M-YK, and RR wrote and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Korean Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (714001-07) and by NRF-2020K1A4A7A02095058 through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and amp; Future Planning, Republic of Korea, and the Korea-UK partnership grant (MC-PC-18069).

Conflict of Interest

Authors T-HK and M-SY were employed by the company Natural Bio-Materials Inc. (NBM).

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Julian K.-C. Ma for sharing the vaccine platform concept, originally developed in his lab and Yuri Gleba (Icon Genetics) for sharing the magnICON® expression system.

References

Antas, M., and Woźniakowski, G. (2019). Current status of porcine epidemic diarrhoea (PED) in European pigs. J. Vet. Res. 63, 465–470. doi:10.2478/jvetres-2019-0064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blome, S., Franzke, K., and Beer, M. (2020). African swine fever - a review of current knowledge. Virus. Res. 287, 198099. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chakraborti, S., Prabakaran, P., Xiao, X., and Dimitrov, D. S. (2005). The SARS coronavirus S glycoprotein receptor binding domain: fine mapping and functional characterization. Virol. J. 2, 73. doi:10.1186/1743-422x-2-73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, C. Y., Cheng, I. C., Chang, Y. C., Tsai, P. S., Lai, S. Y., Huang, Y. L., et al. (2019). Identification of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting novel conformational epitopes of the porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus spike protein. Sci. Rep. 9, 2529. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39844-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, S. H., Bae, J. L., Kang, T. J., Kim, J., Chung, G. H., Lim, C. W., et al. (2002). Identification of the epitope region capable of inducing neutralizing antibodies against the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Mol. Cell 14, 295–299.

Google Scholar

Chen, F., Pan, Y., Zhang, X, Tian, X., Wang, D., Zhou, Q., et al. (2012). Complete genome sequence of a variant porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strain isolated in China. J. Virol. 86, 12448.

Google Scholar

Cox, J. C., Sjölander, A., and Barr, I. G. (1998). ISCOMs and other saponin based adjuvants. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 32, 247–271. doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(98)00013-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crill, W. D., and Roehrig, J. T. (2001). Monoclonal antibodies that bind to domain III of dengue virus E glycoprotein are the most efficient blockers of virus adsorption to Vero cells. J. Virol. 75, 7769–7773. doi:10.1128/jvi.75.16.7769-7773.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davis, A. C., and Shulman, M. J. (1989). IgM--molecular requirements for its assembly and function. Immunol. Today 10 (118-122), 127–118. doi:10.1016/0167-5699(89)90244-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dempsey, P. W., Allison, M. E. D., Akkaraju, S., Goodnow, C. C., and Fearon, D. T. (1996). C3d of complement as a molecular adjuvant: bridging innate and acquired immunity. Science 271, 348–350. doi:10.1126/science.271.5247.348

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Do Hai, Q., Le Van, P., Le Dinh, Q., Than Duc, D., Tran Thi, N., Vu Thi, T. H., et al. (2016). Direct Submission. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam. Trau Quy-Gia Lam, Hanoi, Vietnam:National University of Agriculture.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drew, T. W. (2011). The emergence and evolution of swine viral diseases: to what extend have husbandry systems and global trade contributed to their distribution and diversity? Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE 30, 95–106. doi:10.20506/rst.30.1.2020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fazel, S., Wiersma, E. J., and Shulman, M. J. (1997). Interplay of J chain and disulfide bonding in assembly of polymeric IgM. Int. Immunol. 9, 1149–1158. doi:10.1093/intimm/9.8.1149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frutiger, S., Hughes, G. J., Paquet, N., Luethy, R., and Jaton, J. C. (1992). Disulfide bond assignment in human J chain and its covalent pairing with immunoglobulin M. Biochemistry 31, 12643–12647. doi:10.1021/bi00165a014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gleba, Y., Klimyuk, V., and Marillonnet, S. (2005). Magnifection?a new platform for expressing recombinant vaccines in plants. Vaccine 23, 2042–2048. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goede, D., and Morrison, R. B. (2016). Production impact & time to stability in sow herds infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). Prev. Vet. Med. 123, 202–207. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y., Li, J., Li, W., Lustigman, S., Farzan, M., and Jiang, S. (2006). Cross-neutralization of human and palm civet severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses by antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domain of spike protein. J. Immunol. 176, 6085–6092. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, S., Kou, Z., Li, W., Farzan, M., et al. (2004). Receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein induces highly potent neutralizing antibodies: implication for developing subunit vaccine. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 324, 773–781. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ho, T. T., Nguyen, G. T., Pham, N. B., Le, V. P., Trinh, T. B. N., Vu, T. H., et al. (2020). Plant-derived trimeric CO-26K-equivalent epitope induced neutralizing antibodies against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Front. Immunol. 11, 2152. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.02152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huy, N.-X., and Kim, M.-Y. (2017). Overexpression and oral immunogenicity of a dengue antigen transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cel Tiss Organ. Cult 131, 567–577. doi:10.1007/s11240-017-1306-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huy, N.-X., Kim, S.-H., Yang, M.-S., and Kim, T.-G. (2012). Immunogenicity of a neutralizing epitope from porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: M cell targeting ligand fusion protein expressed in transgenic rice calli. Plant Cel Rep 31, 1933–1942. doi:10.1007/s00299-012-1306-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huy, N.-X., Tien, N.-Q. -D., Kim, M.-Y., Kim, T.-G., Jang, Y.-S., and Yang, M.-S. (2016). Immunogenicity of an S1D epitope from porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and cholera toxin B subunit fusion protein transiently expressed in infiltrated Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Plant Cel Tiss Organ. Cult 127, 369–380. doi:10.1007/s11240-016-1059-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jang, G., Park, J., and Lee, C. (2019). Complete genome sequences of novel S-deletion variants of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus identified from a recurrent outbreak on Jeju Island, South Korea. Arch. Virol. 164, 2621–2625. doi:10.1007/s00705-019-04360-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jespersgaard, C., Hajishengallis, G., Greenway, T. E., Smith, D. J., Russell, M. W., and Michalek, S. M. (1999). Functional and immunogenic characterization of two cloned regions of Streptococcus mutansGlucosyltransferase I. Infect. Immun. 67, 810–816. doi:10.1128/iai.67.2.810-816.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansen, F. E., Braathen, R., and Brandtzaeg, P. (2000). Role of J chain in secretory immunoglobulin formation. Scand. J. Immunol. 52, 240–248. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3083.2000.00790.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, T. J., Seo, J. E., Kim, T. G., Kim, T. G., Jang, Y. S., and Yang, M. S. (2005). Cloning and sequence analysis of the Korean strain of spike gene of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and expression of its neutralizing epitope in plants. Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 378–383.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, B.-Y., and Kim, M.-Y. (2019). Evaluation of the oral immunogenicity of M cell-targeted tetravalent EDIII antigen for development of plant-based edible vaccine against dengue infection. Plant Cel Tiss Organ. Cult 137, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s11240-018-01544-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, M.-Y., Kim, B.-Y., Oh, S.-M., Reljic, R., Jang, Y.-S., and Yang, M.-S. (2016). Oral immunisation of mice with transgenic rice calli expressing cholera toxin B subunit fused to consensus dengue cEDIII antigen induces antibodies to all four dengue serotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 92, 347–356. doi:10.1007/s11103-016-0517-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, M.-Y., Kim, T.-G., and Yang, M.-S. (2017a). Production and immunogenicity of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae ApxIIA protein in transgenic rice callus. Protein Expr. Purif. 132, 116–123. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2016.05.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, M.-Y., Reljic, R., Kilbourne, J., Ceballos-Olvera, I., Yang, M.-S., Reyes-Del Valle, J., et al. (2015). Novel vaccination approach for dengue infection based on recombinant immune complex universal platform. Vaccine 33, 1830–1838. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, M.-Y., Van Dolleweerd, C., Copland, A., Paul, M. J., Hofmann, S., Webster, G. R., et al. (2017b). Molecular engineering and plant expression of an immunoglobulin heavy chain scaffold for delivery of a dengue vaccine candidate. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1590–1601. doi:10.1111/pbi.12741

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, M. Y., Copland, A., Nayak, K., Chandele, A., Ahmed, M. S., Zhang, Q., et al. (2018). Plant-expressed Fc-fusion protein tetravalent dengue vaccine with inherent adjuvant properties. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1283–1294. doi:10.1111/pbi.12869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, T.-G., Kim, B.-G., Kim, M.-Y., Choi, J.-K., Jung, E.-S., and Yang, M.-S. (2010). Expression and immunogenicity of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin B subunit in transgenic rice callus. Mol. Biotechnol. 44, 14–21. doi:10.1007/s12033-009-9200-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, C. (2015). Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: an emerging and re-emerging epizootic swine virus. Virol. J. 12, 193. doi:10.1186/s12985-015-0421-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, D.-K., Park, C.-K., Kim, S.-H., and Lee, C. (2010). Heterogeneity in spike protein genes of porcine epidemic diarrhea viruses isolated in Korea. Virus. Res. 149, 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2010.01.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, G., Na, Y. J., Yang, B.-G., Choi, J.-P., Seo, Y. B., Hong, C.-P., et al. (2015). Oral immunization of haemaggulutinin H5 expressed in plant endoplasmic reticulum with adjuvant saponin protects mice against highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus infection. Plant Biotechnol. J. 13, 62–72. doi:10.1111/pbi.12235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Wu, Q., Huang, L., Yuan, C., Wang, J., and Yang, Q. (2018). An alternative pathway of enteric PEDV dissemination from nasal cavity to intestinal mucosa in swine. Nat. Commun. 9, 3811. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06056-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lyon, G. M., Mehta, A. K., Varkey, J. B., Brantly, K., Plyler, L., Mcelroy, A. K., et al. (2014). Clinical care of two patients with Ebola virus disease in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2402–2409. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1409838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mekhaiel, D. N., Czajkowsky, D. M., Andersen, J. T., Shi, J., El-Faham, M., Doenhoff, M., et al. (2011). Polymeric human Fc-fusion proteins with modified effector functions. Sci. Rep. 1, 124. doi:10.1038/srep00124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nam, E., and Lee, C. (2010). Contribution of the porcine aminopeptidase N (CD13) receptor density to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection. Vet. Microbiol. 144, 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ojkic, D., Hazlett, M., Fairles, J., Marom, A., Slavic, D., Maxie, G., et al. (2015). The first case of porcine epidemic diarrhea in Canada. Can. Vet. J. 56, 149–152.

PubMed AbstractGoogle Scholar

Okda, F. A., Lawson, S., Singrey, A., Nelson, J., Hain, K. S., Joshi, L. R., et al. (2017). The S2 glycoprotein subunit of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus contains immunodominant neutralizing epitopes. Virology 509, 185–194. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2017.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ou, X., Liu, Y., Lei, X., Li, P., Mi, D., Ren, L., et al. (2020). Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, J.-E., Kang, K.-J., Ryu, J.-H., Park, J.-Y., Jang, H., Sung, D.-J., et al. (2018). Porcine epidemic diarrhea vaccine evaluation using a newly isolated strain from Korea. Vet. Microbiol. 221, 19–26. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.05.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pensaert, M. B., and De Bouck, P. (1978). A new coronavirus-like particle associated with diarrhea in swine. Arch. Virol. 58, 243–247.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pickering, R. J., Smith, S. D., Strugnell, R. A., Wesselingh, S. L., and Webster, D. E. (2006). Crude saponins improve the immune response to an oral plant-made measles vaccine. Vaccine 24, 144–150. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pillet, S., Couillard, J., Trepanier, S., Poulin, J. F., Yassine-Diab, B., Guy, B., et al. (2019). Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent plant-derived virus like particle influenza vaccine candidate-Two randomized Phase II clinical trials in 18 to 49 and >/=50 years old adults. PLoS One 14, e0216533. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rajput, Z. I., Hu, S.-h., Xiao, C.-w., and Arijo, A. G. (2007). Adjuvant effects of saponins on animal immune responses. J. Zhejiang Univ. - Sci. B 8, 153–161. doi:10.1631/jzus.2007.b0153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shrestha, B., Brien, J. D., Sukupolvi-Petty, S., Austin, S. K., Edeling, M. A., Kim, T., et al. (2010). The development of therapeutic antibodies that neutralize homologous and heterologous genotypes of dengue virus type 1. Plos Pathog. 6, e1000823. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000823

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sjolander, A., and Cox, J. C. (1998). Uptake and adjuvant activity of orally delivered saponin and ISCOM? vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 34, 321–338. doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(98)00046-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, G. J. D., Vijaykrishna, D., Bahl, J., Lycett, S. J., Worobey, M., Pybus, O. G., et al. (2009). Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic. Nature 459, 1122–1125. doi:10.1038/nature08182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, R. I., Coloma, M. J., and Morrison, S. L. (1995). Addition of a mu-tailpiece to IgG results in polymeric antibodies with enhanced effector functions including complement-mediated cytolysis by IgG4. J. Immunol. 154, 2226–2236.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Strasser, R., Stadlmann, J., Schähs, M., Stiegler, G., Quendler, H., Mach, L., et al. (2008). Generation of glyco-engineered Nicotiana benthamiana for the production of monoclonal antibodies with a homogeneous human-like N-glycan structure. Plant Biotechnol. J. 6, 392–402. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00330.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, D., Feng, L., Shi, H., Chen, J., Cui, X., Chen, H., et al. (2008). Identification of two novel B cell epitopes on porcine epidemic diarrhea virus spike protein. Vet. Microbiol. 131, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.02.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, H.-X., Xie, Y., and Ye, Y.-P. (2009). Advances in saponin-based adjuvants. Vaccine 27, 1787–1796. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, M., Ma, J., Yu, Z., Pan, Z., Lu, C., and Yao, H. (2017). Identification of two mutation sites in spike and envelope proteins mediating optimal cellular infection of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus from different pathways. Vet Res. 48, 44.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vollmers, H. P., and Brändlein, S. (2006). Natural IgM antibodies: the orphaned molecules in immune surveillance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58, 755–765. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.08.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahala, W. M. P. B., Kraus, A. A., Haymore, L. B., Accavitti-Loper, M. A., and De Silva, A. M. (2009). Dengue virus neutralization by human immune sera: role of envelope protein domain III-reactive antibody. Virology 392, 103–113. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2009.06.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Lu, Q., and Wang, X. (2019). Direct Submission. College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, No. 1 Weigang Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Webster, G. R., Van Dolleweerd, C., Guerra, T., Stelter, S., Hofmann, S., Kim, M.-Y., et al. (2018). A polymeric immunoglobulin-antigen fusion protein strategy for enhancing vaccine immunogenicity. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 1983–1996. doi:10.1111/pbi.12932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, K. L., Wahala, W. M. P. B., Orozco, S., De Silva, A. M., and Harris, E. (2012). Antibodies targeting dengue virus envelope domain III are not required for serotype-specific protection or prevention of enhancement in vivo. Virology 429, 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2012.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wise, A. A., Liu, Z., and Binns, A. N. (2006). Three methods for the introduction of foreign DNA into Agrobacterium. Methods Mol. Biol. 343, 43–53. doi:10.1385/1-59745-130-4:43

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoo, E. M., Coloma, M. J., Trinh, K. R., Nguyen, T. Q., Vuong, L.-U. C., Morrison, S. L., et al. (1999). Structural requirements for polymeric immunoglobulin assembly and association with J chain. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33771–33777. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.47.33771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Li, Z., Zeng, X., Zhang, G., Niu, J., Sun, B., et al. (2017). Sequence analysis of the spike gene of Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus isolated from South China during 2011-2015. J. Vet. Sci. 18, 237–243. doi:10.4142/jvs.2017.18.2.237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: vaccine, PEDV, mucosal, immunity, plant

Citation: Tien N-Q-D, Yang M-S, Jang Y-S, Kwon T-H, Reljic R and Kim M-y (2021) Systemic and Oral Immunogenicity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antigen Fused to Poly-Fc of Immunoglobulin G and Expressed in ΔXT/FT Nicotiana benthamiana Plants. Front. Pharmacol. 12:653064. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.653064

Received: 31 January 2021; Accepted: 16 March 2021;
Published: 30 April 2021.

Edited by:

Mariusz Skwarczynski, The University of Queensland, Australia

Reviewed by:

Lijie Tang, Northeast Agricultural University, China
Faten A. Okda, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
Hugh S. Mason, Arizona State University, United States

Copyright © 2021 Tien, Yang, Jang, Kwon, Reljic and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rajko Reljic, rreljic@sgul.ac.uk; Mi-young Kim, mkim@sgul.ac.uk