SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol., 30 August 2021

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.708549

Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge: A Review on Botany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Applications

    EZ

    Erhuan Zang 1

    BQ

    Bin Qiu 2

    NC

    Namuhan Chen 3,4

    CL

    Caifeng Li 3,4

    QL

    Qian Liu 1

    MZ

    Min Zhang 1

    YL

    Yuchao Liu 1,5

    ML

    Minhui Li 1,3,4,5,6*

  • 1. Department of Pharmacy, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, China

  • 2. School of Chinese Materia Medica and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Southern Medicinal Resource, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China

  • 3. Pharmaceutical Laboratory, Inner Mongolia Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hohhot, China

  • 4. Pharmaceutical Laboratory, Inner Mongolia Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hohhot, China

  • 5. Office of Academic Research, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar, China

  • 6. Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Characteristic Geoherbs Resources Protection and Utilization, Baotou, China

Article metrics

View details

44

Citations

7,1k

Views

3,1k

Downloads

Abstract

Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge (Sapindaceae) is a native Chinese plant with promising applications as a biofuel feedstock and a source of novel drugs. Historical records and documents from different periods have mentioned the use of X. sorbifolium and its botanical constituents in treating diseases, highlighting its central role in Chinese and Mongolian traditional medicinal therapies. Phytochemical research has focused on the husks, leaves, trunks, and branches of this herb. A total of 278 chemical compounds have been isolated and divided into 8 categories: triterpenoids, flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, steroids, phenols, fatty acids, alkaloids, and quinones. Modern pharmacological studies on X. sorbifolium have demonstrated positive effects on learning and memory, as well as anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and anti-oxidative properties. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the available research on X. sorbifolium, focusing on the relationship between chemical constituents, traditional uses, and pharmacological effects. We also assess the potential for therapeutic and other applications of this plant in support of further research and development of X. sorbifolium.

Introduction

Xanthoceras sorbifolium, belonging to the family Sapindaceae and genus Xanthoceras, is a monotypic species widely distributed throughout China. The plant, commonly called the yellow horn or golden horn (Xu and Yu, 2010), is a valuable woody oil crop used to extract edible and medicinal ingredients, produce biofuels, and for greening of deserts. In China, X. sorbifolium was first recorded in the Chinese Materia Medica “Jiu Huang Ben Cao” (1406 AD) under the name “Wen Guan Hua.” It is used to treat arterial sclerosis, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, chronic hepatitis, and rheumatism (Wang, 1998; Li et al., 2007a). More importantly, each part of X. sorbifolium has a certain medicinal and health value and is used to prevent and treat diseases. The extract prepared from its husks has anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties; it also inhibits human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease and improves learning and memory, among other pharmacological effects (Zhang et al., 2016). The flower and calyx contain baicalin, which has antipyretic, sleep-inducing, anti-spasmodic, and anti-tumor effects. Their seeds can be used to prevent and cure arterial sclerosis (Wan et al., 2013). In Inner Mongolia, the trunks and branches were used to treat arthritis, as discussed in the Chinese Pharmacopeia in 1977 (Commission NP, 1977). Xanthoceraside is a triterpenoid saponin extracted from the husks of X. sorbifolium. It has many biological activities, such as improving learning and memory, and has anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory properties. Xanthoceraside may become a candidate for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Yang C. Y. et al., 2016).

In addition to its medicinal value, X. sorbifolium has unique applications in the food and chemical industries, and in environmental protection (Wan et al., 2013). The seeds of X. sorbifolium are rich in unsaturated fatty acids and are used to prepare cooking oil. The kernels can be incorporated into seasoned dairy products or processed protein drinks. The leaves can also be used as tea (its protein content is higher than that of black tea), and the caffeine content is similar to that of flower tea (Wang, 1998). Xanthoceras sorbifolium can also be used in cosmetics and to make biodiesel. The husks of X. sorbifolium (which are considered by-products) can be used to produce chemical materials, such as activated carbon, furfural, xylitol, and alcohol (Yi et al., 2011). Furthermore, this herb is an excellent windbreak and a pioneer sand fixation species that is resistant to drought, wind, and sand. They are also easy to cultivate. Extensive X. sorbifolium plantations have been established in northern China to combat desertification. Other properties of this plant include cold tolerance, soil resistance, and high seed oil content. Therefore, it has become the preferred oil and eco-economic tree species for greening, returning farmland to forest, providing shelter against wind, and preventing sand erosion in mountainous areas (Bai et al., 2010). Xanthoceras sorbifolium has broad development prospects, especially in the fields of food, medicine, energy, and ecology. It is regarded as one of the most promising tree species for sustainable development in the 21st century.

In recent years, phytochemistry research has isolated 278 components from different sections of X. sorbifolium, including triterpenoids, flavonoids, phenylpropanoids, steroids, phenols, fatty acids, alkaloids, quinones, and others (Cheng et al., 2001; Wan et al., 2013; Yang C. Y. et al., 2016). These abundant bioactive components have a wide range of pharmacological activities (Yang L. et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Hao et al., 2021), including improved learning ability and memory (Ji et al., 2014; Rong et al., 2019), anti-inflammatory (Qi et al., 2013), anti-tumor (Wang et al., 2016a), antioxidant (Zhang et al., 2015; Yang CY. et al., 2016), anti-HIV (Li et al., 2007b), and vascular relaxation effects (Ma et al., 2000), as well as inhibition of pancreatic lipase activity (Geng et al., 2014). Increasing evidence regarding the medicinal value and excellent bioenergy value of X. sorbifolium highlights the need to evaluate its practical applications.

This review systematically summarizes the botanical and morphological characteristics, pharmacological effects, recorded medicinal history, and ethnic medicine applications of this herb. Through an extensive analysis of all relevant articles and books, we present the remarkable achievements and shortcomings of existing research, as well as some possible perspectives and trends for future studies on X. sorbifolium. This comprehensive review aims to provide a reference for future research, development, and utilization of X. sorbifolium.

Methodology and Literature Search Strategy

The extensive literature search involved articles, papers, and books from different sources, such as Embase-Elsevier, PubMed, Science Direct, SciFinder Scholar, Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar, CNKI, and Web of Science. The search strategy was based on combining different keywords, such as X. sorbifolium, traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and review. The literature search results included publications from 1960 to 2021 to ensure a systematic analysis of data on X. sorbifolium. Literature screening involved initially reading the keywords, title, and abstract of retrieved literature to identify the article’s relevance to this research. Potentially relevant literature was then downloaded, and the full text was assessed. Any relevant literature was included in the analysis. Any literature that did not conform to the theme was excluded. The chemical structural formula used in this manuscript was created using ChemDraw 18.0 (PerkinElmer, United States).

Botany and Characteristics

Xanthoceras sorbifolium grows to 2–5 m in height with stout branchlets that are brownish red in color and glabrous with tile-liked bud scales arranged on the top and side buds. The leaf peduncle is 15–30 cm in length. There are 4–8 pairs of leaflets, membranous or papery, lanceolate or subovate. The lateral veins are slender and slightly raised on both sides. The inflorescence grows before or simultaneously with the leaves. The flowers are monoecious and the inflorescence is terminal. The axillary of the male inflorescences is 12–20 cm in length and erect with a short total pedicel and a residual bud scale at the base. The pedicel is 1.2–2 cm in length. The bracts are 0.5–1 cm long. The sepals are 6–7 mm long with gray hairs on both sides. The petals are white, but the base is purplish-red or yellow. The fruit consists of a capsule that is 5–6 cm in diameter with three seed compartments that are 1–1.5 cm in diameter. The number of seeds per compartment can vary from one to six. The seeds are black and shiny (Editorial Board of Flora of China, 1985; Xu and Yu, 2010). The different parts of X. sorbifolium are listed in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge. (A). Whole plant; (B). Fruits; (C). Seeds; (D). Flowers; (E). Wood (The thunks and branches); (F). Leaves; (G). Husks.

Xanthoceras sorbifolium grows in temperate and warm temperate zones, where the altitude ranges from 300 to 2000 m and the horizontal range is 28°34′–47°20′ E and 73°20′–120°25′ N. The species is mainly distributed in 18 provinces of China, including Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Hebei, and Henan. According to a resource survey, Chifeng in Inner Mongolia has the most concentrated populations and currently possesses the largest mangrove forest in China. The species is long-lived (up to 1,000 years), and it can grow in soil in pH ranges from 7 to 8.5. It can tolerate drought, low temperature, and soils that constitute clay, sand, or loam, including those that are alkaline, and of low fertility. It also grows well in deserted mountains, barren gullies, sandy lands, and steep hillsides (Mou et al., 2008; Xie et al., 2010).

Phytochemistry

Among the 278 compounds that have been isolated and identified from X. sorbifolium, triterpenes and flavonoids have been regarded as characteristic and main bioactive substances due to their variety, content, and pharmacological activities (Yang C. Y. et al., 2016). The structures and relevant references for these compounds are listed in Figures 210 and Table 1.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Structures of triterpenoids in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

Structures of flavonoids in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4

Structures of phenylpropanoids in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5

Structures of steroids in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6

Structures of phenolic compounds in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7

Structures of fatty acid compounds in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8

Structures of alkaloid compounds in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 9

FIGURE 9

Structures of quinone compounds in X. sorbifolium.

FIGURE 10

FIGURE 10

Structures of other compounds in X. sorbifolium.

TABLE 1

NO.Compounds classification and namePlant partsReferences
Triterpenoids
01R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresLi (2006a)
0221-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresLin et al. (2004)
0322-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresLi (2006a)
0421,22-di-O-angeloyl -R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresLi et al. (2005a)
0521,22-di-O-angeloyl-24-hydroxy-R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresLi (2006a)
0628-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-21-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresWang et al. (2011); Li and Li (2014)
0721-O-angeloyl-24-hydroxy-R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresLi and Li (2008)
08xanifolia Y0HusksChan et al. (2008)
09xanifolia Y2HusksChan et al. (2008)
10xanifolia Y3HusksChan et al. (2008)
11xanifolia Y7HusksChan et al. (2008)
123-O-(3-O-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-2-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-(6-O-methyl)-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl-21,22-di-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusks/CarpophoresWang et al. (2011)
133-O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→6)-(2-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl saniculagenic C-28-O-α-L-rhamnopytanosyl-(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksWan et al. (2013)
143-O-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)-β-D-methyl glucuronic acid-21, 22-O-diangeloyl-3β, 15α, 16α, 21β, 22α, 28β-hexahydroxyl-olean-12-eneHusksGuo et al. (2009)
153-O-(2-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-(6-O-methyl)-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl-21,22-di-O-angeloy-R1-barrigenolLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
163-O-(2-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl)-(6-O-methyl)-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl-21-O-(3′,4′-di-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl-22-O-acetyl-R1-barrigenolLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
17xanthocerasideTrunks and branchesLiu et al. (2013)
186′-methylether-O-xanifolia-Y5HusksWang et al. (2016a)
196′-methylester-O-xanifolia-Y2HusksWang et al. (2016a)
20xanifolia YHusksWang et al. (2016a)
21xanifolia ACH-YHusksWang et al. (2016a)
22barringtogenol CHusksLi (2006a)
2322-O-angeloyl-21-O-epoxyangeloyl-barringtogenol CHusksLi (2006a)
2422-O-acetyl-21-O-(4′-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl theasapogenol BCarpophoresLi et al. (2016a); Li et al. (2006c)
2521,22-di-O-angeloyl-barringtogenol CHusksLi et al. (2005a)
26xanifolia Y8HusksChan et al. (2008)
27xanifolia Y10HusksChan et al. (2008)
283- O-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)-β-D-methyl glucuronic acid-21-O-(3,4-diangeloyl)-α-L-rhamnose-3β,16α,21β,22α,28β-pentahydroxyl-22-acetoxy-olean-12-eneHusksGuo et al. (2009)
2921,22-diangeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksLi et al. (2005b)
3021,22-diangeloyl-24-hydroxy-R1-barrigenolHusksLi et al. (2005b)
313-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)[α-L-α-rabinofuranosy (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-21,22-di-O-angeloyl-R1-barringenolLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
3216-deoxybarringtogenol CHusks/CarpophoresLi (2006a)
3316- O-acetyl-21-O-(4-O-angeloyl-α-L-rhamnopytanosyl)-barringtogenol CHusks/CarpophoresLi (2006a)
343-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl- 28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
35sorbifoliaside AHusks/CarpophoresYu et al. (2012a)
36sorbifoliaside BHusks/CarpophoresYu et al. (2012a)
37sorbifoliaside CHusks/CarpophoresYu et al. (2012a)
38sorbifoliaside DHusks/CarpophoresYu et al. (2012a)
39sorbifoliaside EHusks/CarpophoresYu et al. (2012a)
40sorbifoliaside FHusks/CarpophoresYu et al. (2012a)
41sorbifoliaside GSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012b)
42sorbifoliaside HSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012b)
43sorbifoliaside ISeed oil residueYu et al. (2012b)
44sorbifoliaside JSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012b)
453-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)](3′-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopytanosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CCarpophoresLi et al. (2008)
463- O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)[α-L-rhamnopytanosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusks/CarpophoresLi et al. (2016a)
473-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusks/CarpophoresWang et al. (2011); Li and Li (2014)
4816-O-acetyl-21-O-(4-O-angeloyl-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-barringtogenol CHusksLi (2006a)
4916-O-acetyl-21-O-(3′,4′-di-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl theasapogenol BHusks/CarpophoresLi et al. (2007d)
5028-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusksLi (2006a); Li et al. (2007c)
513-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl,28-O-[α-L-rhamnosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CCarpophoresLi et al. (2008)
523-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-21β,22α-dihydroxyl-olean-12-eneHusksCui et al. (2012)
533-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-21β,22α-dihydroxyl-olean-12-eneHusksCui et al. (2012)
543-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-[angeloyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-21β,22α-dihydroxylolean-12-eneHusks/CarpophoresCui et al. (2012)
553- O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-(2′-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)[α-L-rhamnopytanosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
563-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnosyl (1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
573-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-(3′-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]16-deoxybarringtogenol CLeavesXiao et al. (2013)
5828-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusksLi (2006a)
593-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)] 3′- angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CCarpophoresLi et al. (2008)
60xanthohuskisides AHusksLi et al. (2013d)
61xanthohuskisides BHusksLi et al. (2013d)
6221β-O-acetylxanthohuskiside AHusksWang et al. (2018)
633-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
643- O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1 → 6)]-[(3-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-[α-L-rhamanopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
653-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1 → 6)]-(3-O-angeloyl) -β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamanopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
66sorbifoliasideHusksFu et al. (2010)
67xanifolia O54HusksFu et al. (2010)
683-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]β-D-glucopyranosyl-21β,22α-dihydroxyl-olean-12,15-dieneHusksLi et al. (2013c)
693-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2) [β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]β-D-glucopyranosyl-21β,22α-dihydroxyl-olean-12-eneHusksLi et al. (2013c)
703-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-21-O-(3,4-O-diangeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl-22-O-acetyl-barringtogenolHusksWang et al. (2016b)
713-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-21-O-(3,4-O-diangeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl-28-O-acetyl- barringtogenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
723-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1 →3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-21,22-O-diangeloyl-R1-barrigenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
733-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-21-O-angeloyl-22-O-(2-methyl)butyryl-R1-barrigenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
743-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-21,22-O-diangeloyl-24-hydroxy-R1-barrigenolHusksWang et al. (2016b)
753- O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1 → 3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-21,22-O-diangeloyl-βarringtogenol CHusksWang et al. (2016b)
76napoleogenin BHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985b)
7722-O-acnapoleogenin BHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985b)
7821-O-(3,4-di-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl theasapogenol BHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985a)
7921-O-(4-O-acetyl-3-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl theasapogenol BHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985a)
8021-O-(4-O-acetyl-3-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl-22-O-acetyl protoaescigeninHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985a)
813-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)-β-D-6′-n-butyl-glucuronic acid-21-O-epoxyangeloyl-22-O-angeloyl-3β,16α,21β,22α,28-pentahydroxyolean-12-eneHusksWang et al. (2016a)
8216-O-acetyl-aesculioside G12HusksWang et al. (2016a)
833- O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)-β-D-6′-methyl-glucuronic acid-21-O-(3‴,4‴-O-diangeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl-28-O-acetyl-3β,16α,21β,22α,28-pentahydroxy-olean-12-eneHusksWang et al. (2016a)
846′-methylester-O-xanifolia-Y8HusksWang et al. (2016a)
85bunkankasaponin ASeed oil residueYu et al. (2012a)
86bunkankasaponin BSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012a)
87bunkankasaponin CSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012a)
88bunkankasaponin DSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012a)
89bunkankasaponin FSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012a)
903-O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside bunkanka saponin AHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985c)
9116-O-acetyl-21-O-(3,4-di-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl protoaescigenHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985c)
92oleanolic acidHusks/Carpophores/Trunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
93β-arabinopyranosyl-(1→4)-[O-β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→6)-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-D-glucopyranosyluronic acid-(1→3)-gypsogeninHusks/CarpophoresChirva and Kintya (1971)
943-O-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)-α-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-methyl glucuronic acid 21-O-(3,4-diangeloyl)-α-L-rhamnose-3β, 16α,21β,22α,28β-pentahydroxyl-22-acetoxy-olean-12-eneHusksGuo et al. (2009)
95sorbifoliasides KSeed oil residueYu et al. (2012b)
963β,23-dihydroxy-lup-20 (29)-en-28-oic acid-23-caffeateHusks/CarpophoresLi et al. (2007d)
973β,23-dihydroxy-lup-20 (29)-en-28-oic acid-3-caffeateHusks/CarpophoresLi and Li (2008a)
98betulinHusks/Carpophore/FlowersLi et al. (2005a); Zhao et al. (2012)
9923-hydroxybetulinic acidHusks/CarpophoresLi and Li (2008a)
1003α,29-dihydroxytirucalla-7, 24-dien-21-oic acidHusks/CarpophoresMa et al. (2000)
1013β-hydroxytirucalla-7, 24-dien-21-oic acidTrunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
10229-hydroxy-3-oxotirucalla-7,24-dien-21-oic acidTrunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
10329-O-acetyl-3-oxotirucalla-7,24-dien-21-oic acidTrunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
1043β,29-dihydroxytirucalla-7, 24-dien-21-oic acidTrunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
1053-oxotriucalla-7, 24-dien-21-oic acidTrunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
10624-methylenecycloartan-3-olTrunks and branchesMa et al. (2000)
107protoaescigeninHusks/CarpophoresChen et al. (1985b)
1083-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-6-O-methylglucuronopyranosyl-21-O-angeloyl-22-O-(2-methyl) butyryl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020a)
1093-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-21,22-di-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020a)
1103-O-β-D-6-O-methyl-glucuronopyranosyl-21-O-angeloy-22-O-isobutyryl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020a)
11121-acetyl-3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]- [angeloyl (1 → 3)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxy-barringtogenol CHusksChen et al. (2020a)
11221-O-acetyl-3-O- [β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-[angeloyl (1→3)]-β-D-4-O-acetyl-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16- deoxybarringtogenol CHusksChen et al. (2020a)
11321-acetyl-3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-[angeloyl (1→ 4)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxy-barringtogenol CHusksChen et al. (2020a)
11428-O-acetyl-21-O-β-D-fucopyranosyl barrigenol CHusksChen et al. (2020a)
11521-O-(3,4-di-O-angeloyl)-β-D-fucopyranosyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020a)
1163-O-α-D-glucuronopyranosyl-21,22-di-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020a)
11721-O-epoxyangeloyl-22-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020b)
11821-O-(2, 3-di- hydroxy-2-methylbutyryl)-22-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020b)
11928-O-isobutyryl-21-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020b)
1203-O-β-D-6-O-methylglucuronopyranosyl-21-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020b)
1213-O-β-D-6-O-methylglucuronopyranosyl-21-O-angeloyl-22-O-isobutyryl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020b)
1223-O-β-D-6-O-methylglucuronopyranosyl-21,22-di-O-angeloyl-R1-barrigenolHusksChen et al. (2020b)
1233-O-β-D-6-O-methylglucuronopyranosyl- 21-O-(3,4-di-O-angeloyl-β-D-fucopyranosyl) barrigenol CHusksChen et al. (2020b)
1243-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-(2-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-21-O-acetyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol CHusksDing et al. (2019)
Flavonoids
125quercetinTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersZhang and Bao (2000); Wu (2017); Zhao et al. (2012)
126myricetinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhang and Bao (2000); Wu (2017)
127kaempferolTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersLi (2006a); Zhao et al. (2012)
128rhamnocitrinTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersZhao et al. (2012)
129mearnsetinHusksManthey and Guthrie (2002)
130quercimetrinHusksPanyadee et al. (2015)
131quercitrinFlowersZhao et al. (2012)
132isoquercitrinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhao et al. (2013); Aderogba et al. (2013)
1333-O-methyl-quercetinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhao et al. (2013)
134myricitrinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksKang et al. (2012); Wu (2017)
135isomericitrinHusks/FlowersYang et al. (2016a); Zhao et al. (2012)
136kaempferol-3-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosideTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhao et al. (2013)
137kaempferol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranosideTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersZhao et al. (2013)
138kaempferol-3-O-(2-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-glucopyranosideTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhao et al. (2012)
139kaempferol-3-O-rutinosideTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersLi (2006a); Zhao et al. (2012); Yang et al. (2016a)
140rutinHusksLi (2006a)
141chrysoeriolTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersZhao et al. (2012)
142tricetinHusksYang et al. (2016a)
143myricetin 3-O-rutinosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
144isorhamnetin 3-O-rutinosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
145luteolinHusksWan et al. (2015)
146naringeninTrunks and branches/Leaves/Husks/FlowersWu (2017); Zhao et al. (2012); Yang et al. (2016a)
147eriodictyolTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksLi (2006a); Li et al. (2006b); Yang et al. (2016a)
148eriodictyol 4′-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
149(2S)-eriodictyol-7-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
150(2R)-eriodictyol-7-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
151naringenin 5-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
152naringenin 4′-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
153(-)-salipurposideHusksYang et al. (2016a)
154naringenin-7-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksWan et al. (2015)
1552α-3′,4′,5,5′,7-pentahydroxyflavoneTrunks and branchesWu (2017)
1563,3′,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavanoneTrunks and branchesWu (2017)
1572β,3β-3,3′,5,5′-pentahydroxyflavoneTrunks and branchesWu (2017)
1582α, 3β-dihydroquercetinTrunks and branches/Leaves/FruitsZhang and Bao (2000); Wu (2017)
159dihydromyricetinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhang and Bao, 2000; Wu (2017)
160aromadendrinHusksYang et al. (2016a)
161taxifolinHusksYang et al. (2016a)
162catechinHusksYang et al. (2016a)
163gallocatechinTrunks and branches/HusksNi and Zhang (2009); Yang et al. (2016a)
164(−)-epicatechinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksZhang and Bao (2000)
165(−)-epigallocatechinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksHuang and Feng (1987)
166(−)-epiafzelechinTrunks and branches/Leaves/HusksMa and Nakamura (2004)
167epicatechin-5-O-β-D-glucopyranaosideSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
168epigallocatechin-(4β→8,2βO-7)-epicatechinTrunks and branchesWu (2017)
169procyanidin A-2Trunks and branchesWu (2017)
170proanthocyanidin A2Trunks and branchesWu (2017)
171cirmamtanninB-1HusksYang et al. (2016a)
1722α,3α-epoxy-5,7,3′,4′-tetrahydroxyflavan-(4β-8-catechin)Trunks and branchesWu (2017)
Phenylpropanoids
173fraxinSeed oil leavingsZhu et al. (2018)
174fraxetinSeed oil residueChen et al. (1984)
175isofraxetinFruitsLi (2006a)
176isofraxetin-6-O-β-D-glucopyranosideHusksLi (2006a)
177fraxetin-7-O-β-D-[6’-(3″-hydroxyl-3‴- methylglutaryl)] glucopyranosideSeed oil residueZhu et al. (2018)
178scopoletinSeed oil residueZhu et al. (2018)
179isoscopoletinFlowersZhao et al. (2013)
180esculetinSeed oil residueZhu et al. (2018)
181xanthotoxinHusksWan et al. (2015)
182cleomiscosin DHusksLi (2006a); Li et al. (2006b)
183cleomiscosin BHusksLi et al. (2007b)
184meso-2,3-di (3′,4′-methylenedioxybenzyl) butane-1,4-diolSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
185umbelliferoneHusksYang et al. (2020a)
186biscopoletinHusksYang et al. (2020a)
Steroids
18722, 23-dehydroxy-chondeillasteroneHusks/CarpophoresWan et al. (2013)
188stigmasterol acetateHusksLi et al. (2007a)
189(3β,5α,20R,24S)-stigmasta-7,trans-22-dien-3-olHusksCheng et al. (2001)
190(3β,5α,20R,24S)-stigmasta-7-en-3-olHusksCheng et al. (2001)
191α-spinasterolHusksLi et al. (2005a)
192ergosterol peroxideHusksLi (2006a)
1939 (11)-dehydro-ergosterol peroxideHusksLi (2006a)
1945α,8α-epidioxy-(22E,24R)-ergosta-6,22-dien-3β-olHusksLi (2006a)
195Δ7-stigmastenolCarpophoresLi et al. (2005a)
196Δ7-avenasterolCarpophoresLi et al. (2005a)
197daucosterolCarpophoresLi et al. (2005a)
198β-sitosterolTrunks and branches/seed oil residueLi et al. (2005a);Yu et al. (2018)
199stigmasterolTrunks and branches/seed oil residueDong et al. (2008); Li et al. (2007a)
200β-sitosterol acetateKernel oilYan et al. (1984)
201campesterolKernel oilYan et al. (1984)
202campesterol acetateKernel oilYan et al. (1984)
203cholesterolKernel oilYan et al. (1984)
Phenols
2042-hydroxy-6-methylbenzoic acidTrunks and branches/HusksLi (2006a); Wu (2017)
205vanillic acidHusksLi (2006a)
206gallic acidHusksYang et al. (2016a)
207tyrosolHusksLi (2006a)
2084-hydroxyphenylacetic acidHusksLi (2006a)
209protocatechuic acidHusksYang et al. (2016a)
210isochlorogenic acid BTrunks and branchesWu (2017)
2114-hydroxybenzaldehydeHusksLi (2006a)
212p-hydroxybenzoic acidHusksYang et al. (2016a)
213xspolyphenol AHusksYang et al. (2016a)
214xspolyphenol BHusksYang et al. (2016a)
215pyrogallolHusksYang et al. (2016a)
216hydroquinoneHusksWan et al. (2015)
2174-hydroxybenzylcyanideHusksWan et al. (2015)
2185,7-dihydroxychromoneTrunks and branches/Leave/HuskLi (2006a)
219methyl 4-hydroxylbenzoateHusksYang et al. (2016a)
220methyl caffeoateSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
Fatty acids
221nonadecanoic acidTrunks and branchesLi et al. (2007a)
222heneiosanoic acidTrunks and branchesLi et al. (2007a)
223tetracosanoic acidTrunks and branchesLi et al. (2007a)
224myristic acidKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
225palmitoleic acidKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
226arachidic acidKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
227docosadienoic acidKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
228tricosanoic acidKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
229nervonic acidKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
230oleic acidKernelsWang (1998)
231erucic acidKernelsWang (1998)
232linolenic acidKernelsWang (1998)
233eicosadienoic acidKernelsWang (1998)
234stearic acidKernelsWang (1998)
235eicosanoic acidKernelsWang (1998)
236lignoceric acidKernelsWang (1998)
237behenic acidKernelsWang (1998)
238dodecanoic acidKernelsWang (1998)
239hexanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
240heptanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
241nonanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
242decanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
24310-methylundecanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
24412-methyltetradecanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
245heptadecanoic acidHusksCheng et al. (2002)
246palmitic acidKernels oilBao et al. (2012)
2479,12-octadecadienoic acidKernels oilLi et al. (2013a)
2489-octadecadienoic acidKernels oilLi et al. (2013a)
24911-eicosenoic acidKernels oilLi et al. (2013a)
Alkaloids
2502-methyl-6-(2′, 3′, 4′-trihydroxybutyl) -pyrazineHusksLi (2006a); Li et al. (2006b)
251indole-3-carboxaldehydeSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
252allantoinSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
253indole-3-acetylaspartic acidSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
2541-oxa-2-azaspiro [4.5]dec-2-ene-8-olHusksGe et al. (2016)
255trans-xanthoisoxazoline AFlowers/HusksLi et al. (2018)
256cis-xanthoisoxazoline AFlowers/HusksLi et al. (2018)
257xanthoisoxazoline BFlowers/HusksLi et al. (2018)
258xanthoisoxazoline CFlowers/HusksLi et al. (2018)
Quinones
2592,5-dimethoxy-p-benzoquinoneTrunks and branchesDong et al. (2008); Ni and Zhang (2009)
260physcionTrunks and branchesDong et al. (2008)
261chrysophanolFruitsDong et al. (2008)
262emodinFruitsDong et al. (2008)
Others
2633,4,5-trimethoxy benzoic acidTrunks and branchesLi (2006a)
264succinic acidHusksChen et al. (1984)
2654-(α-hydroxyethyl)cyclohexan-1-oic acidHusksYang et al. (2020a)
266vomifoliol-3′-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl-(1–6)-β-D-glucopyranosideSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
267dihydrophaseic acid 3′-O-β-D-glucopyranosideSeed oil residueYu et al. (2018)
268xanthocerapeneTrunks and branchesWu (2017)
2691,4-di-(2-cyanostyryl)benzeneHusksLi (2006a)
2701-O-methyl-myo-inositolFlowersZhao et al. (2012)
271ethyl nonanoateHusksYang et al. (2020a)
272methyl (2E,5S)-(-)-5-methyldodec-2-enoateHusksLi (2006a)
273heptadecan-1-olHusksYang et al. (2020a)
274pentadecanoic acid heptadecyl esterHusksYang et al. (2020a)
275bungeinAHusksYang et al. (2020a)
276tocopherolsKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
277vitamin AKernelsLiang et al. (2021)
278vitamin CKernelsLiang et al. (2021)

The compounds isolated from X. sorbifolium.

Triterpenoids

Triterpenoids represent a large part of the chemical constituents in the X. sorbifolium, with 124 triterpenoid compounds having been identified from the husks, carpophores, leaves, and seeds (compounds 1–124, Figure 2). Yu et al. (2012a) extracted the seed oil residue of X. sorbifolium. The compounds were separated by D-101 macroporous resin, silica gel column chromatography, Sephadex LH-20, octadecylsilyl (ODS) column, and purified by prep-HPLC chromatography. Seven new oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins, sorbifoliaside A-J (35–44), were identified by MS, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY, and TOCSY methods (Yu et al., 2012a; Yu et al., 2012b). Wang et al. (2016b) extracted X. sorbifolium with ethanol, analyzed the compounds by Sephadex LH-20, ODS, UV, MS, and NMR, and identified triterpenoids: 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol C (63), 3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-[(3-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-[α-L-rhamanopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol C (64),3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1 →6)]-(3-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl-28-O-[α-L-rhamanopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl-16-deoxybarringtogenol C (65) (Wang et al., 2016b). Chen et al. (2020a) extracted 70% ethanol from the husk of X. sorbifolium; separated and identified a series of compounds by D-101 macroporous resin, silica gel column, ODS column, and HPLC chromatography; and isolated compounds 108–123 for the first time (Chen et al., 2020a; Chen et al., 2020b). The chemical structures of triterpenoids are provided in Figure 2.

Flavonoids

Flavonoids are a group of naturally occurring compounds that contain a benzopyran heterocycle linked to a benzene ring (Testai, 2015). Currently, 48 flavonoids (125–172) have been obtained from the trunks and branches, leaves, husks, and flowers of X. sorbifolium. Among these compounds, quercetin and myricetin are the main aglycons. Zhang and Bao (2000) used polyamide and silica gel column chromatography to isolate the chemical constituents of lignum xanthocerais. Two flavonoids, 2α, 3β-dihydroquercetin (158), epicatechin (163), were identified by UV, MS, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and 2D-NMR (Zhang and Bao, 2000). Wu (2017) separated and purified the acetone extract of lignum xanthocerais by ODS, Sephadex LH-20, and preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). After that, eight flavonoids, namely myricitrin (134), rutin (140), 3, 3′, 4′, 5, 7-pentahydroxyflavanone (156), dihydromyricetin (159), catechin (161), gallocatechin (162), epigallocatechin (165), procyanidin A-2 (169), were identified by Thin layer chromatography (TLC), 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and MS (Wu, 2017). The chemical structures of flavonoids are provided in Figure 3.

Phenylpropanoids

Phenylpropanoids are natural compounds with benzene rings. Phenylpropanoids generally contain a phenol structure and are a phenolic substance. Fourteen simple phenylpropanoids have been extracted from X. sorbifolium, with their main components being coumarins (compounds 173–181, 185–186) and lignans (compounds 182–184). Zhu et al. (2018) isolated and purified the chemical composition of seed oil residue of X. sorbifolium by silicone, macroporous, Sephadex LH-20, and ODS column chromatography. Four phenylpropanoid compounds, namely fraxin (173), fraxetin-7-O-β-D-[6’-(3″-hydroxyl-3‴- methylglutaryl)] glucopyranoside (177), scopoletin (178), and esculetin (180) were identified by spectral and chemical methods (Zhu et al., 2018). The chemical structures of the phenylpropanoids are provided in Figure 4.

Steroids

Steroids are present in almost all plants and exhibit significant biological activity. Phytosterol is a steroid derivative of the C17 side chain with 8–10 carbon atoms in the side chain. At present, 17 steroids (compounds 187–203) have been reported from the wood, husks, carpophores, seed oil residue, and kernel oil of X. sorbifolium. Yan et al. (1984) used TLC, impregnated silica gel G with 18% silver nitrate, and separated kernel oil of X. sorbifolium with petroleum ether (7:3, V/V) as the developing agent. The steroid compounds β-sitosterol acetate (200), campesterol (201), campesterol acetate (202), and cholesterol (203) were identified by TLC, MS, FT-IR, and GC-MS (Yan et al., 1984). Cheng et al. (2001) separated the husk of X. sorbifolium by column chromatography and spectroscopy to obtain two steroids (3β,5α,20R,24S)-stigmasta-7,trans-22-dien-3-ol (189) and (3β,5α,20R,24S)-stigmasta-7-en-3-ol (190) (Cheng et al., 2001). The chemical structures of the steroids are provided in Figure 5.

Phenols

Through this review, 17 phenolics (compounds 204–220) were found in X. sorbifolium. Wan et al. (2015) studied the chemical constituents of the husk of X. sorbifolium. They were isolated and purified by TLC, Sephadex LH-20 column, ODS column, and preparative HPLC. Two phenolic compounds, hydroquinone (216) and 4-hydroxybenzylcyanide (217) were identified based on physicochemical properties and spectral data (Wan et al., 2015). Wu (2017) separated and purified the acetone extract of lignum xanthocerais by ODS, Sephadex LH-20, and preparative HPLC. After that, two phenolic compounds, protocatechuic acid (209) and isochlorogenic acid B (210), were identified by TLC, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and MS (Wu, 2017). The chemical structures of the phenolic compounds are provided in Figure 6.

Fatty Acids

The fatty acid components are concentrated in the kernels and husks of X. sorbifolium. At present, 29 kinds of fatty acids (compounds 221–249) have been identified. Cheng et al. (2002) used GC-MS to separate and identify seven fatty acid compounds from the husk of X. sorbifolium, which were hexanoic acid (239), heptanoic acid (240), nonanoic acid (241), decanoic acid (242), 10-methylundecanoic acid (243), 12-methyltetradecanoic acid (244) and heptadecanoic acid (245) (Cheng et al., 2002). The chemical structures of fatty acids are provided in Figure 7.

Alkaloids

Nine alkaloids (compounds 250–258) were obtained from the methanol extract of the seed and husks. Among these compounds, Yu et al. (2018) identified the chemical constituents of lignum xanthocerais by 1D- and 2D-NMR, and ESI-MS and obtained three alkaloid compounds, indole-3-carboxaldehyde (251), allantoin (252), indole-3-acetylaspartic acid (253) (Yu et al., 2018). The chemical structures of alkaloids are provided in Figure 8.

Quinones

Four quinones (compounds 259–262) were also found in the fruits and wood of X. sorbifolium. Dong et al. (2008) used silica gel column, preparative TLC, and pharmadex LH-20 column chromatography to isolate compounds from the fruits of X. sorbifolium and identified their structure by a spectral method. As a result, four quinone compounds were isolated: 2,5-dimethoxy-p-benzoquinone (259), physicone (260), chrysophanol (261), and emodin (262) (Dong et al., 2008). The chemical structures of quinones are provided in Figure 9.

Others

In addition to the constituents mentioned previously, an additional sixteen compounds (263–278) were identified. Moreover, some nutritional elements were also found to be abundant in the herb. More than ten amino acids were found in the seeds of X. sorbifolium. It is worth noting that the predominant amino acids present are glutamic plus glutamine, aspartic plus asparagine, and arginine. These amino acids account for up to 43% of the total amino acids present in the species (Fan et al., 2009; Mónica et al., 2017). The chemical structures of other compounds are provided in Figure 10.

Pharmacological Activities

The pharmacological properties of X. sorbifolium have attracted a great deal of attention in recent years. The main pharmacological activities of X. sorbifolium include improving learning and memory impairments, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and anti-oxidation. In particular, the triterpene saponin xanthoceraside, a characteristic compound of X. sorbifolium, shows excellent learning and memory improvement, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumor activities. Table 2 lists some in vitro and in vivo pharmacological models and related dosage information to clarify the pharmacological activities of X. sorbifolium.

TABLE 2

Pharmaceutical effectsUsed partCompounds/extractsDosesModelsResults/mechanismReferences
Improving learning and memory impairmentsFruit stalks3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1 → 6)] (3′-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl, 28-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1 → 6)]-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1 → 2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl 16-deoxybarringtogenol C0.32 mg kg−1Male Kunming (KM) miceSignificantly protective against ICV-Aβ1-42. induced learning and memory impairmentLi et al. (2020)
HusksXanthoceraside0.02, 0.08 and 0.32 mg kg−1Male ICR miceXanthoceraside inhibition of the TLR2 pathway and down-regulation of MAPK and NF-κB activities may be related to the improvement in learning and memory impairmentsQi et al. (2017)
HusksXanthoceraside0.056, 0.112, and 0.224 mg kg−1Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) ratsXanthoceraside can modulate the structure of gut microbiota in AD rats, and the gut microbiota may be potential targeting territory of xanthoceraside via microbiome-gut-brain pathwayZhou et al. (2019)
HusksXanthoceraside0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg mL−1SD ratsExhibited obvious neuroprotection against amyloid-β-induced cytotoxicity on PC12 cells, indicating their potential to be bioactive substances against Alzheimer’s diseaseRong et al. (2018)
HusksXanthoceraside0.06, 0.12, and 0.24 mg kg−1RatsBoth memory deficits and insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-1R) protein expression levels were amelioratedLiu et al. (2013)
HusksXanthoceraside0.01 and 0.1 μMSH-SY5Y cellsSignificantly increased the survival rate of SH-SY5Y cells injured by Aβ25-35 in a dose-dependent mannerChi et al. (2013)
HusksTotal triterpenoid saponins0.93, 2.8, and 8.4 mg kg−1KM mice and SD ratsSignificantly improve the impairments of learning and memory. The preliminary mechanism might associate with its protection effects against oxidative stress damage, cholinergic system deficiency and synaptic damageJi et al. (2017)
HusksCrude extract of the husks50 mg kg−1SD ratCrude extract of the husks from Xanthoceras sorbifolia might ameliorate the impairment of learning and memory in the Alzheimer’s disease animal model with similar function of AchEI as huperzineSun et al. (2018)
HusksEthanol extracts89.80, 44.90 mg kg−1KM miceIt significantly improved the impairment of learning and memory, and the mechanism may be related to the enhancement of the function of the central cholinergic and glutamatergic nervous systems, and resistance to oxygen consumption injury in brain tissueLiu et al. (2007b)
HusksEthanol extracts2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg kg−1·D−1AD rat modelOral treatment with XSE significantly reduced cognitive impairments in behavioral tests (passive avoidance test, novel object recognition test, Y-maze test and Morris water maze test). The cognition-improving effects of XSE probably resulted from dendritic spine protection effects through regulation of BDNF signaling pathways.Li et al. (2016b)
HusksEthanol extract62.9 mg⋅kg−1Wistar ratsSignificantly improve the learning and memory ability of rats, increase superoxide dismutase activity, reduce MDA and acetylcholinesterase levels, and significantly inhibit the degeneration and shedding of hippocampal neuronsLiu et al. (2007a)
Anti-inflammatoryLeavesQuercetin-3-O-β-D-glucopyarnoside, catechin, syringaresinol-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, 4-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-trans-p-coumaric acidIC50 13.39 ± 1.27 µM, 9.52 ± 2.18 µM, 3.08 ± 1.77 µM, and 9.08 ± 1.23 µMLPS-induced BV2 cellsThe compounds exhibited much stronger inhibiting effect on NO production than that of the positive control minocycline (IC50 37.04 ± 2.09 µM) in LPS-induced BV2 cellsLi et al. (2016a)
HusksXanthoceraside0.01 and 0.1 μMMicroglial cellsThe inhibitory effect of xanthoceraside on pro-inflammatory mediators was possibly mediated through TLR2 receptor/MyD88 in Aβ25-35/IFN-g-stimulated N9 microglial cellsQi et al. (2013)
Woodn-Butanol extract1.0, 2.0 g kg−1Wistar ratsIt has antagonistic effect on adjuvant arthritis in rats, and its mechanism may be related to the inhibition of immune functionKuang and Liu (2002)
Anti-tumorHusksXanifolia Y2.5, 5, and 10 mMHepG2, HCT116, and U87-MG cell linesIt could suppress U87-MG cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis in the early period of exposure and then promote arrest at the G0/G1 phaseWang et al. (2016a)
HusksXanthoceraside10 μMA375.S2 cellsXanthoceraside selectively inhibits the proliferation of human melanoma A375 cell line and induces apoptosis through the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathwayJiao et al. (2014)
Husks3-O-[α-L-arabinofuranosyl (1→3)]-[β-D-galactopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-(6-O-n-butyl)- glucuronopyranosyl-21, 22-O-diangeloyl-R1-barrigenol9.75 and 17.32 μMHepG2, HCT-116 cellThe compound showed significant inhibitory activity against the proliferation of HepG2, HCT-116 cell linesWang et al. (2016b)
Wood3-Oxotirucalla-7,24-dien-21-oic acid, oleanolic acid, epicatechin20, 10, and 70 μg mL−1HIV-1 PRThey were found to be inhibitory substances against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) proteaseMa et al. (2000)
KernelsTotal saponins9.7 ± 0.39 mg L−1HepG2 cellTotal saponins can induce apoptosis of HepG2 cells. The flow cytometry showed that the late apoptosis of cancer cells may be concentrated in the S phase of cell cycleZhang et al. (2016)
Husks95% Ethanol-water extract75 μg mL−1HepG2 cellWhen the mass concentration of 95% ethanol water extract was 75 μg mL−1, the inhibition of HepG2 cell proliferation effect was up to 70.1%Zhang et al. (2017)
Anti-oxidationWoodCatechin, epicatechin, myricetin, and dihydromyricetin6.5, 4.2, 3.8, and 5.7 μg mL−1-These four compounds has been shown to scavenge DPPH radicals, with EC50 values of 6.5, 4.2, 3.8, and 5.7 μg mL−1, and afford remarkable protection of peroxyl radical-induced DNA strand scission, exhibiting protection values of 92.10, 94.66, 75.44, and 89.95% at a concentration of 10 μmol L−1Zhang et al. (2015)
HusksTotal saponins50 μg mL−1A549, HepG2, MGC-803, and MFC cell linesThe total saponins have shown the ability to scavenge hydroxyl free radicals and superoxide anion free radicals; this scavenging ability exhibited a dose-effect relationship with concentrationYang et al. (2016a)
SeedsSeed oil0.151, 0.195 g mL−1-The seed oil exhibited notable DPPH radical-scavenging activity and lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 0.151 and 0.195 g mL−1Zhang et al. (2010)
HusksSaponins0.18–2.52 mg mL−1The rate of tyrosinase catalyzed L-DOPA oxidationAt a concentration of 0.18–2.52 mg mL−1, the hydroxyl radical-scavenging effect of the saponins form X. sorbifolium husks was 15.5–68.7%Zhang and Zhou (2013a)
KernelsMicrowave-assisted extraction extract of triterpene saponins0.782 mg mL−1-Microwave-assisted extraction extract of triterpene saponins exhibited substantial free radical-scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 0.782 mg mL−1Li et al. (2010)
SeedsSeed oil0.11, 0.22, 0.33 ml/(20 g bw)Male KM miceThe activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT and GSH-Px in liver and brain of mice in the cold pressing oil test group were significantly higher than those in the normal control groupDeng et al. (2010)
SeedsSeed oil0.1–1.4 g·mL−1-Seed oil has a good scavenging effect on hydroxyl radical and superoxide anion radical, has a strong scavenging effect on DPPH radical, and its reduction ability exceeds BHT and TBHQ. It also has a good inhibitory effect on Fe2+ induced lipid peroxidation at higher concentrationDeng et al. (2012)
HuskEthanol extract0.2 mg·mL−1-The ethanol extracts exhibited a scavenging effect on DPPH, with the 70% ethanol aqueous extract showing the strongest activity for scavenging the DPPH free-radical at a concentration of 0.2 mg·mL−1Zhang et al. (2017)
AntidepressantHusksXanthoceraside0.02, 0.08 and 0.32 mg·kg−1Adult male C57BL/6J miceXanthoceraside possesses antidepressant effects in mice which are mediated by activation of hippocampal BDNF signaling pathwayGuan et al. (2021)
Anti-HIVSeed coatCleomiscosin B8.61–12.76 μg·mL−1C8166 cellThe cleomiscosin B have exhibited an effect on HIV-1 IIIB-induced C8166 cell formation in syncytia with an EC50 of 8.61–12.76 μg·mL−1, as well as a protective effect on MT4 cells infected by HIV-1 IIIB.Li et al. (2007b)

The pharmaceutical effects of X. sorbifolium.

Improving Learning and Memory Impairments

Improving learning and memory impairments is mainly demonstrated through the regression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD is a neurodegenerative disease that exhibits relentless progression in cognition impairment and memory dysfunction. Its formation and development are closely associated with the neurotoxicity of extracellular amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposits (Li et al., 2020). The specific mechanisms include the induction of apoptosis (Qu et al., 2000), activation of glial cells to induce inflammatory cascades (Li et al., 1998), triggering of oxidative stress (Huang et al., 1999), increase in intracellular Ca2+, and reduction of cell membrane fluidity (Tian et al., 2001). Among these, Aβ-associated oxidative stress and related antioxidant defense system deficits are fundamental mechanisms in AD etiopathogenesis (Ma and Klann, 2012).

Previous studies indicate that barrigenol-type triterpenoids exhibit remarkable protective effects against spatial memory impairments. As such, they have the potential to be used in AD therapy and other neurodegenerative diseases. For instance, Qi et al. (2017) used an intracerebroventricular injection of amyloid 1–42 (Aβ1-42) to establish a mouse model to test the effect of xanthoceraside on Aβ-induced cognitive dysfunction and the influence of the TLR2/NF-κB and MAPK pathway. The results showed that xanthoceraside at doses of 0.08 and 0.32 mg kg−1 significantly improved learning and memory impairments in mice and significantly inhibited Aβ1-42-induced overexpression of GFAP and CD11b. The results suggested that xanthoceraside inhibited the TLR2 pathway and downregulated MAPK and NF-κB activity, which may be associated with improved learning and memory impairment (Qi et al., 2017). Li et al. (2020) isolated 8 kinds of barrigenol-type triterpenoids, all of which firstly detected the oxidative stress effect of hydrogen peroxide on human SH-SY5Y cells. Then Y-maze, Morris water maze, new object recognition, and passive avoidance tests were used to evaluate the improvement effect of the selected compounds on ICV Aβ1-42 mice. The compounds, (3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)] (3′-O-angeloyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl and 28-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→6)]-[α-L-rhamnopyranosyl (1→2)]-β-D-glucopyranosyl 16-deoxybarring-togenol C (0.32 mg kg−1) showed significant improvements in enhancing memory disorders, object recognition defects, learning and memory impairments, and spatial memory disorders induced by Aβ1-42 (410 pmol in 3 μL) in intracerebroventricular (ICV)-injected mice (Li et al., 2020).

Ji et al. (2017) reported that total triterpenoid saponins from X. sorbifolium husks significantly improves learning and memory impairments. Specifically, it significantly increased spontaneous alternation in the Y maze test and prolonged swimming duration in the fourth quadrant of the Morris water maze probe test at a dosage of 8.4 mg kg−1. This substance also improved escape latency and passive avoidance test results in a dose-dependent manner. The primary mechanism might be associated with its protective effects against oxidative stress damage, cholinergic system deficiency, and synaptic damage (Ji et al., 2017). A study conducted using a rat AD model with ICV injection of Aβ25–35 revealed that rats receiving 70% aqueous ethanol extracts containing husks of X. sorbifolium (5 and 10 mg kg−1) demonstrated an upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression, which protects the dendritic spine and achieves cognition-improving effects. The primary mechanism was a decrease in the dendritic spine density via activation of the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway and inhibition of the RhoA/ROCK2 signaling pathway (Li Y. et al., 2016). In mice models impaired by scopolamine and sodium nitrite, ethanol extracts from the pericarp of X. sorbifolium (89.80, 44.90 mg kg−1, i g), bunkanka saponins (1.51, 0.76 mg⋅kg−1, i g), and ST-n-2 (a saponin, 0.32, 0.16 mg⋅kg−1, i g) were found to notably improve memory acquisition after impairment induced by scopolamine and memory consolidation impairment induced by sodium nitrite. The mechanism may involve central cholinergic and glutamatergic nervous system functions and protection against damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in brain tissue.

In summary, the ability of X. sorbifolium to improve learning and memory impairment has been thoroughly studied, and the related active compounds and mechanisms have been revealed. Several studies reported on the signaling pathways that regulate and improve learning and memory impairment, indicating that this is an important pharmacological activity of X. sorbifolium. However, this pharmacological activity has not been widely applied in clinical research. Therefore, future research should focus on the practical application of this pharmacological activity to achieve a wide range of clinical applications and maximize the pharmacological value of this plant.

Anti-Inflammatory Activity

Anti-inflammatories are the second-largest class of drugs after antibacterial agents; thus, the anti-inflammatory effects of the active ingredients of Chinese herbal medicines have become a hot research topic (Li and Zhu, 2012; Rajendiran et al., 2018). The anti-inflammatory effect of X. sorbifolium has also been extensively studied, including the anti-inflammatory mechanism behind its traditional uses for rheumatism and scabies.

Current research has found that the extracts and compounds from X. sorbifolium mainly affect neuroinflammation, vascular inflammation, and rheumatoid arthritis. The flavonoids and phenylpropanoids isolated from the leaves of X. sorbifolium decreased nitric oxide (NO) production in the lipopolysaccharide-induced BV2 microglial cells. Among them, the inhibitory effect of 4-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-trans-p-coumaric acid (IC50 = 9.08 ± 1.23 μM) on NO was significantly stronger than that of the positive control minocycline (IC50 = 37.04 ± 2.09 μM) (Li N. et al., 2016). Another report also indicated that a 70% ethanol extract of X. sorbifolium husk is rich in effective anti-neuro-inflammatory active ingredients. Among them, the two triterpenoids (IC50 values of 5.01 ± 0.22 and 3.05 ± 1.21 μM) and the two alkaloids (IC50 values of 9.61 ± 0.21 and 4.72 ± 0.52 μM) were significantly stronger than the positive drug minocycline (IC50 = 30.31 ± 3.01 μM) (Chen et al., 2020a). The ethanol extract from X. sorbifolium seeds (1–50 μg mL−1) has significant implications for the prevention of vascular complications, which is linked to inhibition of the NF-κB/reactive oxygen species (ROS) pathway and activation of the Nrf-2/HO-1 pathway (Jung Joo et al., 2018). Xanthoceraside (extracted from the husk of X. sorbifolium) significantly inhibits the release of NO, IL-1β, and TNF-α in a concentration (0.01 and 0.1 µM)-dependent manner (Qi et al., 2013). In addition, gavage with n-butanol extract (2,000 mg kg−1; from X. sorbifolium wood) has shown a significant inhibitory effect on ear swelling induced by xylene (25 μL·ear−1) in Chinese Kunming (KM) mice, indicating that n-butanol extracts in X. sorbifolium wood can inhibit the early exudation and edema caused by inflammation (Kuang et al., 2001). Similarly, 7 days of gavage with the n-butanol extracts of X. sorbifolium wood (1.5 g kg−1) significantly inhibited the swellings in inflamed feet, non-inflamed feet, and forelimbs of Wistar male rats induced by the intradermal injection of Freund’s complete adjuvant (0.1 ml) in the plantar region of the foot. These results indicated that n-butanol extracts from lignum xanthocerais had an inhibitory effect on primary and secondary joint swelling in rats with adjuvant arthritis and improved the systemic symptoms of adjuvant arthritis in rats (Kuang and Liu, 2002).

At present, most reports only used the crude extract to verify the anti-inflammatory activity of X. sorbifolium. Although it has been verified in vivo and in vitro, there are still great shortcomings in the research of X. sorbifolium. Therefore, more extensive pharmacological studies should be carried out to clarify the mechanism underlying the anti-inflammatory effect of X. sorbifolium and determine its active compounds to provide reliable data to support the development and utilization of X. sorbifolium.

Anti-Tumor Activity

In general, the anti-tumor activities of natural products are often evaluated by their ability to inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells and induce immune cells to secrete cytokines that act on tumor cells (Keawsard et al., 2012). The functional constituents of natural plant resources as anti-cancer agents have become increasingly popular, with many focusing on barrigenol triterpenes.

In one study, xanthoceraside (10 μM) significantly inhibited the proliferation of human melanoma A375. S2 cells through the mitochondrial pathway in a concentration- and time-dependent manner without impairing the viability of normal cells and increased the percentage of cells in the sub-G1 phase (Jiao et al., 2014). Moreover, Wang et al. (2016b) adopted the CCK-8 method to test the n-BuOH layer of a 70% X. sorbifolium husk extract and 10 barrigenol-like triterpenoids against cancer cells of the human hepatoma cell line (HepG2), human colorectal cancer cell line (HCT-116), and human glioma cell line (U87-MG). The results showed that the n-BuOH layer of a 70% X. sorbifolium husk extract exhibited many anti-tumor activities against HepG2, HCT-116, and U87-MG cell lines, with IC50 values of 15.3, 6.7, and 16.3 μg mL−1, respectively (Wang et al., 2016b). Furthermore, Chan (2007) isolated xanthoceraside from an 80% ethanol extract of X. sorbifolium husk, and determined its effect on the growth of various human cancer cell lines, including OVCAR3 (ovary), HTB-9 (bladder), U2OS (bone), DU145 (prostate), K562 (leukocyte), HepG2 (liver), MCF-7 (breast), T98G (brain), HCT116 (colon), H460 (lung), SK-Mel-5 (skin), and HeLa-S3 (cervix) cell lines, using the MTT assay with IC50 values of 14.5 ± 1, 48.3 ± 3, 46.7 ± 8, 41.7 ± 8, 44.3 ± 6, 57 ± 11, 65 ± 0, 77.5 ± 11, 103.3 ± 3, 112.5 ± 4, 115 ± 7, and 130 ± 14 μg mL−1, respectively.

Xanthoceras sorbifolium has an inhibitory effect on a variety of cancer cells. However, CCK-8 and MTT methods can only verify its inhibitory effect but fail to reveal the exact molecular mechanism. Therefore, further in vivo experiments are needed to determine the effective chemical constituents and signal pathways and clarify the anti-cancer mechanism of X. sorbifolium.

Antioxidant Activity

Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of various chronic diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. ROS are often associated with oxidative stress. Scavenging or inhibiting ROS generation can delay or prevent oxidative cellular oxidizable substrates from achieving anti-oxidation (Uttara et al., 2009; Small et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2018). In recent years, deeper investigations of X. sorbifolium have highlighted its antioxidant activity.

Zhang et al. (2015) reported that the compounds epicatechin, catechin, myricetin, and dihydromyricetin, which exist in lignum xanthocerais, showed remarkable protective effects against peroxyl radical-induced DNA strand scission (when the concentration was 10 μmol L−1, the protective rates were 92.10, 94.66, 75.44, and 89.95%, respectively). Furthermore, some researchers have reported that saponins from the X. sorbifolium nutshell have a higher scavenging effect than vitamin C in vitro. The hydroxyl radical-scavenging effects of saponins were 15.5–68.7% at a concentration of 0.18–2.52 mg mL−1 (Zhang and Zhou, 2013a). The antioxidant activity of crude extracts in ethanol extraction fractions of 10, 30, 50, 70, and 95% showed scavenging effects on DPPH with a dose-dependent relationship. The 70% ethanol extract had the most substantial effect (the DPPH scavenging rate reached 70.82% at a mass concentration of 0.2 mg mL−1) (Zhang et al., 2017). These results also support the traditional use of treating metabolic syndromes, such as diabetes and hypertension.

As various studies have revealed the antioxidant activities of X. sorbifolium, this plant should be further explored for potential novel antioxidants. However, verification methods such as DPPH analysis may overestimate the antioxidant content. Moreover, these determination methods cannot characterize all the analytical properties of the extract (Amorati and Valgimigli, 2015). Therefore, these methods are not yet sufficient for elucidating the antioxidant mechanism of X. sorbifolium, and further research is required to investigate the kinetics of this mechanism.

Other Pharmacological Activities

Xanthoceras sorbifolium has other pharmacological activities, including anti-HIV, and plays protective roles in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Ma et al., 2000; Li et al., 2007b; Jin et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013; Geng et al., 2014). Furthermore, it also inhibits the activities of pancreatic lipase and tyrosinase.

For example, 3-oxotirucalla-7, 24-dien-21-oic acid, oleanolic acid, and epigallocatechin-(4β→8,2β→O-7)-epicatechin isolated from the methanol extract from lignum xanthocerais are inhibitors of HIV-1 protease with IC50 values of 20, 10, and 70 μg mL−1, respectively (Ma et al., 2000). Li et al. (2007b) reported that the coumarin compound (cleomiscosin B) extracted from the seed coat possessed strong anti-HIV-1 activity in vitro. It also had a strong inhibitory effect on HIV-1 IIIB-induced C8166 cell formation in the syncytia with an EC50 value of 8.61–12.76 μg mL−1 and a selectivity index of greater than 15.67–23.23 (Li et al., 2007b). Xu et al. (2014) found that xanthoceraside can significantly improve cerebral artery ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Its mechanism may promote synaptic remodeling and/or reduce synaptic structural and functional damage (Xu et al., 2014). Geng et al. (2014) found that xanthoceraside significantly inhibits pancreatic lipase activity, and the maximum inhibitory rate can reach 87.5%. Therefore, as a weight-loss factor, xanthoceraside has broad prospects as both healthy food and medicine (Geng et al., 2014). Moreover, flavonoids and saponins extracted from the husk of X. sorbifolium have been shown to exhibit inhibitory effects on tyrosinase. For example, the inhibition rate was 45% at a flavonoid concentration of 0.48 mg mL−1 and showed non-linear changes (Zhang et al., 2013). Zhang et al. (2013) showed that the saponin extract inhibited tyrosinase and was non-competitive at a concentration of 0.36 mg mL−1, where the inhibition rate reached 64.6% (Zhang et al., 2013). Therefore, extracting flavonoids and saponins from the husk of X. sorbifolium as whitening components is in line with the current development trend of exploiting natural compounds as beauty components and improves the economic value of agricultural byproducts.

In general, there are many studies on the pharmacological activities of triterpenoids in X. sorbifolium. It is worth noting that xanthoceraside has many biological activities, and it may become a candidate compound for the prevention and treatment of AD and related diseases (Chi et al., 2010). The effective parts or active components with anti-AD effects can be isolated from X. sorbifolium, which can be used to prepare functional foods or drugs to improve learning and memory and have the potential to become leading anti-AD drugs through further research and development. However, screening for bioactivity and evaluation of most other categories of compounds remains at the crude extract level. To date, only a few reports have investigated the chemical constituents, bioactivity, pharmacodynamic, and mechanisms of action of extracts from X. sorbifolium, which remain elusive.

Structure-Activity Relationships

In the process of summarizing the chemical composition and pharmacology of oleanane-type triterpenes in X. sorbifolium, the general structural properties of the extracts along with their biological activities have been investigated. Compounds with the same structural skeletons, but different types or positions of substituents have more significant impacts on cytotoxic activities. The triterpenoids with structural skeletons of R1-barrigenol triterpenes were the active ingredients for anti-AD. Similarly, the barringtogenol C triterpenes and 16-deoxy barringtogenol C triterpenes were the active ingredients for anti-tumor activities. The triterpenes with no hydroxyl substitution at C15 and C16 showed no activity. Conversely, a hydroxyl substitution at C15 and C16 or C28 by a glycoside group displayed anti-tumor activity in vitro. However, if the hydroxyl substitution occurred at C24 or glycosylation at C3 and C21, the anti-tumor activity increased. In addition, angeloyl groups at C21 and C22 also play a role in inhibiting cell activity (Li 2006a; Wang et al., 2016b).

Regarding the relationship between the anti-AD activity and the structure of the ingredients, the most vigorous activity occurs in the compound R1-barrigenol. This activity disappears when its C3 is linked with a sugar group or when C24 is substituted with a hydroxyl group. Conversely, if ring A or E is substituted by a hydroxyl group, acetoxy group, or sugar chains, the activity of the compound decreases or disappears because of the different steric hindrance of C21/C22. For example, in compounds 22-di-O-angeloyl-24-hydroxy-R1-barrigenol and 21-O-angeloyl-24-hydroxy R1-barrigenol, if the angelic acyls substitute with either C21 or C22, the activity decreases. Therefore, when the activity occurs at C22, the activity decreases, and when the activity at C21 occurs, the activity vanishes. At both C21 and C22, the compound exhibits weak activity. Conversely, the substitution of α-hydroxyl at C15 or C16 can enhance activity (Li, 2006a). A study on the anti-tumor effects showed that saponins with the sugar chains at C3 and C21 exhibited significant cytotoxicity. When an acetoxy group and C28 substituted C22 with a hydroxyl group, the activity was enhanced. However, the activity decreased after exchanging the positions in the two substituent groups. Furthermore, the activity does not seem to be affected by C24 substitution (Chan, 2007). The structure of barrigenol-like triterpenoids greatly influences their activity. Thus, owing to its unique biological activity, X. sorbifolium has significant and far-reaching importance in the development of new natural anti-tumor and anti-AD drugs (Yu et al., 2012a).

Applications

Xanthoceras sorbifolium is a multipurpose plant. All sections of the plant are edible, medicinal, economical, and of ecological value. The trunks and branches, fruits, leaves, and other parts contain natural products with rich structures, including a wide range of biological activities and pharmacological effects. Other sections are utilized as food in China, such as fruit, tea, and cooking oil. Xanthoceras sorbifolium has ornamental value and is useful for carbon storage, soil remediation, and water conservation. The plant can also be used as industrial raw materials.

Traditional Applications

As a traditional medicinal herb in China, X. sorbifolium has been used widely in traditional Chinese and Mongolian medicines. Various plant parts are used for medicine, including trunks and branches, leaves, fruits, seeds, and flowers. The different parts have different medicinal values. The trunks and branches, lignum xanthocerais, are also called “xi la sen deng” in traditional Mongolian medicine (Pharmacopoeia Committee of the Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China, 1998). The therapeutic significance of lignum xanthocerais has been well acknowledged in the ancient Mongolian classics such as “Jing Zhu Ben Cao” (Qing Dynasty, AD 1848), “Meng Yao Zheng Dian” (Qing Dynasty, AD 19th), and “Chinese Materia Medica.” (Demar, 1986) In the 1977 edition of the “Chinese Pharmacopeia,” the folk remedies for the treatment of rheumatism with X. sorbifolium leaves were first recorded (Commission NP. 1977). It has been reported that it is sweet-flavored cool-natured, and suitable to treat scurvy, rheumatism, rheumatoid arthritis, enuresis in children, rheumatic heart disease, swollen glands, overheating, and swelling, and also offers pain relief (Chinese Materia Medica Editorial Committee, 2004; Wang et al., 2011). In addition, fruits are used to treat rheumatism, gout, and enuresis in children as a folklore medicine in Inner Mongolia. It has been developed into a product named “Pediatric Urinary Suspension” by pharmaceutical companies (Zhao et al., 2008). According to the new Tibetan medicine formula, lignum xanthocerais is used in Liuweiximi pills in Tibet, China. It has the effects of tonifying the kidney, “expelling wind and dampness,” relieving pain, and treating kidney and low back pain as well as frequent urination caused by kidney cold (Institute of Tibetan medicine, 1975). X. sorbifolium is also widely used in Northeast China. For example, its seeds are used to treat nocturia in children (Xie, 1996). Its fruit is mainly used for rheumatoid arthritis (Ministry of Health of Shenyang Army Logistics Department, 1970); its wood can dispel wind, remove dampness, detumescence, and relieve pain (National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1999).

In summary, X. sorbifolium has a wide range of traditional uses, and most of its recorded traditional applications are concentrated in northern China. Effectively combining traditional applications of X. sorbifolium with modern clinical applications will be a notable future research direction.

Clinical Applications

Xanthoceras sorbifolium is rich in 278 compounds, providing a reasonable basis for medicinal use. The triterpenes isolated from the husk are promising candidates for medicines to prevent or cure human cancer, AD, enuresis, urinary incontinence, dementia, and modulate cerebral functions (Ge and Wu, 1997; Liu et al., 2007a; Liu et al., 2007b; Chi et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2012; Li and Sun, 2019). The leaves are rich in saponin, flavonoids, protein, and trace elements, with a high inhibitory effect on various human tumor cells (such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, liver cancer, cervical cancer, and leukemia). The leaves can improve the functions of the central nervous system, cholinergic nerve system and fight the damage caused by free radicals, assisting the treatment of urine incontinence and an overactive bladder (Si, 1996). After degreasing, the kernels of X. sorbifolium can be made into efficient drugs to treat pediatric enuresis. The data from 100 initial clinical results show that its efficacy rate is as high as 93%. In addition, lignum xanthocerais is often combined with other medicines in clinical preparations to treat skin diseases and rheumatism. The traditional and modern prescriptions of lignum xanthocerais are listed in Table 3.

TABLE 3

NO.Parts usedPreparation nameMode of preparationTraditionaland clinical usesReferences
1WoodSendeng Siwei TangsanDecoctionArthritis and edemaCommission NP (1977); Li et al. (2013b)
2WoodWenGuanMu Ershiwuwei WanPillRelieve rheumatic pains, remove paralysis, anti-inflammationBa (2007)
3WoodWenGuanMu Jiuwei DecoctionDecoctionRelieve rheumatic pains, detumescence and purging fireBa (2007)
4WoodWenGuanMu Sanwei DecoctionDecoctionRelieve rheumatic pains, clear heat and detoxify, anti-inflammation, moisturize skinSi (1996)
5WoodWenGuanMu RuangaoUunguentUsed for psoriasis, neurodermatitis, and other skin diseasesCommission NP (1977)
6WoodSendeng·Ji ri gan DecoctionDecoctionUsed for rheumatoid arthritis and brucellosisMeng (1991)
7WoodSendeng·ManmariPillRelieve rheumatic pains, clear heat and detoxify. Used for rheumatism and scabiesMeng (1991)
8WoodSendeng·nai maPillRelieve rheumatic pains, clear heat and detoxify. Used for rheumatism, brucellosis, and scabiesMeng (1991)
9WoodSendeng·Duriben DecoctionDecoctionRelieve rheumatic pains, clear heat and detoxify. Used for rheumatic feverMeng (1991)
10WoodShendeng HandaUnguentClear heat. Used for Rheumatism, rheumatoid, joint swelling and pain, eczema and other skin diseasesInner Mongolia Autonomous Region Health Department (1984)

Traditional and modern prescriptions of lignum xanthocerais in China.

Except for the anti-inflammatory activity, which has been widely used in clinical applications, most of the other pharmacological activities have only been studied theoretically; thus, they lack extensive practical research. Therefore, applying the pharmacological activity of X. sorbifolium to clinical practice should be the focus of future X. sorbifolium research.

Edible Applications

The food value of X. sorbifolium is mainly derived from its seeds, kernels, and leaves. Edible oil can be extracted from the seeds and the oil ratio is 30.4% in the seeds and 55–66% in the kernel (Yan, 2007). The oil is a cooking oil with a high smoke point, a yellowish color and delicious flavor and may help in preventing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. In the seed oil, the unsaturated fat has been isolated, accounting for 94.0%, including linoleic acid (36.9%) and oleic acid (57.16%). (Yan, 2007; Zeng et al., 2013). The tender kernels have a unique fruit flavor that can be eaten raw or processed into canned food for giving to infants during weaning.

Additionally, kernels can also be processed into a nutritious fruit juice and a high-quality protein drink. Moreover, the seeds are delicious when fried (Li et al., 2003). The leaves of X. sorbifolium can be processed for tea and lower blood lipids, blood pressure, and protect the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular vessels. In tea, the protein content is as high as 19.8–23.0%, which is higher than black tea, and the caffeine content is similar to scented tea (Hua, 2004). The flower is a hardy honey plant with a long flowering period, enabling a large amount of honey to be produced from the flowers. The husk remaining after oil extraction can be made into high-protein beverages (Li et al., 2003).

Other Applications

In addition to its edible and medicinal uses, X. sorbifolium has a high economic and ecological value. The plant is a potential bio-energy feedstock plant and has been identified as a major woody energy species for biodiesel production. Producers receive special support from the Chinese government for its development. The whole plant can be used as an eco-friendly tree species for soil and water conservation and land reclamation in mining areas (Bai et al., 2010). The husk contains 12.2% furfural, which is the best raw material for furfural extraction. Husks and seed coats can be used as a source of activated carbon, xylitol, alcohol, and other chemical raw materials. The trunks and branches can be exploited as top-grade furniture and farm tools because of the hard texture, strong corrosion resistance, and dark maroon color with a beautiful vein pattern (Xu and Yu, 2010). The plant has a long flowering period with bright colored flowers making it highly ornamental. As an ornamental tree, it is suitable for planting in gardens, parks, and scenic areas (Wan et al., 2010). The flowers are also edible, and the pollen and oil can be used to make advanced beauty skincare products (Zhang et al., 2012).

Conclusion and Discussion

In conclusion, X. sorbifolium, a native plant with economic and medicinal value in China, is rich in resources and is widespread throughout northern China. Here, X. sorbifolium was reviewed with regard to botany, phytochemistry, pharmacological activity, structure-activity relationship, and applications. Concerning the phytochemistry of X. sorbifolium, a total of 278 compounds have been discovered: 124 terpenoids, 48 flavonoids, 14 phenylpropanoids, 17 steroids, 17 phenols, 29 fatty acids, 9 alkaloids, 4 quinones, and 16 other compounds. Modern pharmacology has gradually verified the traditional efficacy of X. sorbifolium and explored its role in treating AD, rheumatism, vasculitis, scabies, and other diseases. The pharmacological effects have mostly focused on improving learning and memory impairment, as well as on anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Nevertheless, there are still some research barriers that need to be overcome. Despite numerous studies on the chemical constituents of X. sorbifolium, research into the corresponding pharmacological activities predominantly involves terpenoids and saponins, especially the landmark compound xanthoceraside, which shows good pharmacological activity related to improving learning and memory impairment, anti-inflammation, and anti-tumor properties. However, research into other types of compounds is very limited. Moreover, it is difficult to link the phytochemistry and pharmacological effects of X. sorbifolium; therefore, this should mark the main direction of future X. sorbifolium research. Furthermore, in the process of studying the structure-activity relationships of X. sorbifolium, it was discovered that the biological activities of compounds with the same structural skeleton but different substituent positions have significant differences, especially in their anti-tumor and anti-AD properties. More research into the structure-activity relationships of X. sorbifolium will be highly significant for the development and utilization of these compounds. In addition, no studies have yet reported any differences in the main production areas or seasons for the same plant component.

Despite the substantial practical value of X. sorbifolium, current research is not comprehensive. It requires further analysis of five main aspects to fully understand all the characteristics of X. sorbifolium. First, 278 compounds were isolated from X. sorbifolium, most of which were terpenoids. However, a lot of unknown compounds are yet to be found. The bioactivity-oriented separation strategy can be used to study potential phytochemicals and explore target compounds. However, the difficulty of phytochemical separation and the low content of compounds limit drug development. In general, using abundant phytochemicals to develop potential compounds can lay a foundation for developing new drugs. Some active derivatives should be considered to enrich the medicinal value of X. sorbifolium. Second, there is currently no standard quality control method or index for assessing the components of X. sorbifolium. Therefore, considerable research should be devoted to creating a standard quality assessment approach to ensure the quality of X. sorbifolium. Specifically, it is necessary to determine X. sorbifolium contents or produce standardized fingerprints to index the components of this species. Third, research on the biological activity of the compounds remains limited, with the majority of selected biological activity research employing only the crude extract. Therefore, more studies are required to assess the pharmacodynamic material and pharmacological mechanisms to obtain relevant compounds responsible for the pharmacological effects and unveil the potential mechanisms involved. In addition, research on the antioxidant activity of X. sorbifolium is mostly based on chemical methods such as DPPH experiments, which are not particularly thorough, making it difficult to reveal the antioxidant mechanism of X. sorbifolium. We believe that X. sorbifolium can become an excellent antioxidant; however, sufficient in vivo and in vitro studies are required to support this development. Fourth, additional pharmacokinetic, metabolomic, and clinical studies are required to elucidate all chemical constituents entering the body and their processes within the body. Such research would aim to build a bridge between the chemical constituents and the systemic clinical effects, which is crucial for fully understanding the target components, pharmacological effects, and potential applications of this plant. Fifth, at present, there is little comprehensive utilization of X. sorbifolium resources, especially the research and utilization of tea-making technology, drinking methods, and health products based on the leaves, which still have a great potential for development and value-added utilization. Furthermore, the oil production from X. sorbifolium generates large volumes of waste, including husks, oil residue, seed meals, and seed coats. Research has shown that the residues are rich in various compounds. There is an urgent need to create new technological systems to develop and utilize these waste products to add value and create societal benefits.

In summary, this review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of the phytochemistry, pharmacology, and traditional and modern applications of X. sorbifolium. We also discuss the limitations of existing literature and propose solutions for further research and development. Finally, we summarize and analyze the importance of X. sorbifolium for medicinal applications.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

ML conceived the review. EZ, BQ, NC, and CL drafted the manuscript. QL, MZ, YL was involved in the editing process. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by 2019 Chinese medicine public health service subsidy special “the fourth survey on Chinese materia medica resource” (Grant No. Finance Society (2019) 39), China Agriculture Research System (Grant No. CARS-21).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AderogbaM. A.NdhlalaA. R.RengasamyK. R.Van StadenJ. (2013). Antimicrobial and Selected In Vitro Enzyme Inhibitory Effects of Leaf Extracts, Flavonols and Indole Alkaloids Isolated from croton Menyharthii. Molecules18 (10), 1263312644. 10.3390/molecules181012633

  • 2

    AmoratiR.ValgimigliL. (2015). Advantages and Limitations of Common Testing Methods for Antioxidants. Free Radic. Res.49 (5), 633649. 10.3109/10715762.2014.996146

  • 3

    BaG. N. (2007). Mongolian Medicine Prescription. Hohhot, China: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing Press, 128137.

  • 4

    BaiD. D.LiuR. X.HuC. Y.LiY. H.YinS. N. (2010). Research on Seedlings Transplanted Technique of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge in Shandong Mining Area. J. Inner Mongolia Agr. Univ.31, 7276.

  • 5

    BaoX.GoY.YuR.LiW. M.YangN.ZhuH. N. (2012). Determination of Fatty Acids in the Seed Kernel Oil of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge by Precolumn-HPLC Derivatization. North. Pharma9 (1), 34.

  • 6

    ChanP. K. (2007). Acylation with Diangeloyl Groups at C21-22 Positions in Triterpenoid Saponins Is Essential for Cytotoxicity towards Tumor Cells. Biochem. Pharmacol.73 (3), 341350. 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.10.007

  • 7

    ChanP. K.ZhaoM.CheC. T.MakE. (2008). Cytotoxic Acylated Triterpene Saponins from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. J. Nat. Prod.71, 12471250. 10.1021/np070577v

  • 8

    ChenG.XieY.ZhouD.YangL.ZouL.ChengM.et al (2020a). In Vivo evaluation and Atom-Based 3D-QSAR Studies on Saponins from Shells of Xanthoceras Sorbifolium Bunge as Anti-AD Agents. Bioorg. Chem.94, 103412. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103412

  • 9

    ChenG.XieY.ZhouD.YangY.LiuJ.HouY.et al (2020b). Chemical Constituents from Shells of Xanthoceras Sorbifolium. Phytochemistry172, 112288. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112288

  • 10

    ChenY. J.TakedaT.OgiharaY.IitakaY. (1984). Studies on the Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. II. Major Sapogenol and a Prosapogenin from the Fruits of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo)32 (2), 33783383. 10.1248/cpb.32.3378

  • 11

    ChenY.TakedaT.OgiharaY. (1985a). Studies on the Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. III. Minor Prosapogenins from the Fruits of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Chem. Pharm. Bull.33 (1), 127134. 10.1248/cpb.33.127

  • 12

    ChenY.TakedaT.OgiharaY. (1985b). Studies on the Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. IV. Structures of the Minor Prosapogenins. Chem. Pharm. Bull.33 (3), 10431048. 10.1248/cpb.33.1043

  • 13

    ChenY.TakedaT.OgiharaY. (1985c). Studies on the Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. V. Major Saponins from the Fruits of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Chem. Pharm. Bull.33 (4), 13871394. 10.1248/cpb.33.1387

  • 14

    ChengW. M.YangB. Z.LiC. R. (2001). Two New Sterols in the Husk of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs32, 199201. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2670.2001.03.004

  • 15

    ChengW. M.YangB. Z.LiJ. (2002). Fatty Acids in the Husk of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Anhui Med. Pharm. J.6 (4), 56. 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2002.04.003

  • 16

    ChiT.-Y.WangL.-H.JiX.-F.ShenL.ZouL.-B. (2013). Protective Effect of Xanthoceraside against β-amyloid-induced Neurotoxicity in Neuroblastoma SH-Sy5y Cells. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.15, 10131022. 10.1080/10286020.2013.821982

  • 17

    ChiT. Y.WangL. H.QuC.YangB. Z.JiX. F.WangY.et al (2009). Protective Effects of Xanthoceraside on Learning and Memory Impairment Induced by Abeta(25-35) in Mice. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.11, 10191027. 10.1080/10286020903337832

  • 18

    ChiT. Y.WangL. H.JiX. F.LiW.WangY.ZouL. B. (2010). Protective Effect of Xanthoceraside on Learning and Memory Impairment Induced by Intracerebroventricular Injections of Aβ1-42 in Mice. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.27 (4), 314319. 10.14066/j.cnki.cn21-1349/r.2010.04.011

  • 19

    Chinese Materia Medica Editorial Committee (2004). Chinese Materia Medica. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Sci. Tech. Press, 132133.

  • 20

    ChirvaV. Y.KintyaP. K. (1971). The Structure of Xanthoceras Saponin. Khim. Prir. Soedin.7 (4), 442444. 10.1007/bf00564728

  • 21

    Commission NP (1977). Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing, China: Chem. Ind. Publishing Agency, 121122.

  • 22

    CuiH.XiaoH.RanX. K.LiY. Y.DouD. Q.KangT. G. (2012). Two New Oleanane-type Pentacyclic Triterpenoid Saponins from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.14 (3), 216223. 10.1080/10286020.2011.641954

  • 23

    DemarD. (1986). Jing Zhu Ben Cao. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Sci. Tech. Publishers, 74.

  • 24

    DengH.FanX.TianZ. (2010). Antioxidation Effect of Cold Pressed Oil of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge Seed In Vivo. Chin. Oils Fats.35 (12), 3840. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7969.2012.01.007

  • 25

    DengH.TianZ. Q.FanX. C.GuoY. R.QiuN. X. (2012). Antioxidation Activity In Vitro of Cold Pressed Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge Kernel Oil. Chin. Oils Fats.37 (1), 2832.

  • 26

    DingK.GuoS.RongW.LiQ.LiuR.XuH.et al (2019). A New Oleanane Type Pentacyclic Triterpenoid Saponin from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolium Bunge and its Neuroprotection on PC12 Cells Injury Induced by Aβ25-35. Nat. Prod. Res.34 (22), 32123218. 10.1080/14786419.2018.1557172

  • 27

    DongY.WangH. W.ChenC. J.ZhaoG. D.GuanH. B. (2008). Chemical Compositions of Lignum Xanthoceratis. J. Beijing Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med.31 (12), 844846. 10.3321/j.issn:1006-2157.2008.12.014

  • 28

    Editorial Board of Flora of China (1985). Flora of China, 47. Beijing, China: Science Press, 72.

  • 29

    FanX.DengH.LiZ.WangC.ZhangY. (2009). Functional Properties and Amino Acid Composition of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge Protein. Chin. Oils Fats.34, 2630. 10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60084-1

  • 30

    FuH.GuoY.LiW.DouD.KangT.KoikeK.et al (2010). A New Angeloylated Triterpenoid Saponin from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Nat. Med.64, 8084. 10.1007/s11418-009-0359-z

  • 31

    GeH. Q.WanG. S.WangD.WuJ. M.SunB. H.WuL. J.et al (2016). Two New Isoxazolines from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.18 (8), 744751. 10.1080/10286020.2016.1167045

  • 32

    GeX.WuL. J. (1997). Clinical Observation on 120 Cases of Diabetes Treated by Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chin. J. Nat. Med.1, 12.

  • 33

    GengJ.ZhangH. M.ZhouQ. C. (2014). Inhibitory Effect of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Nutshell Saponin on Pancreatic Lipase. Mod. Food Sci. Tech.30 (11), 8992. 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2014.11.017

  • 34

    GuanW.GuJ.-H.JiC.-H.LiuY.TangW.-Q.WangY.et al (2021). Xanthoceraside Administration Produces Significant Antidepressant Effects in Mice through Activation of the Hippocampal BDNF Signaling Pathway. Neurosci. Lett.757, 135994. 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135994

  • 35

    GuoY.DouD. Q.KangT. G.WangS. C.KuangH. X. (2009). Structure Elucidation and Complete NMR Spectral Assignments of Two New Oleanane-type Pentacyclic Triterpenoid Saponins from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Magn. Reson. Chem.47, 982988. 10.1002/mrc.2479

  • 36

    HaoD.-C.HouX.-D.GuX.-J.XiaoP.-G.GeG.-B. (2021). Ethnopharmacology, Chemodiversity, and Bioactivity of Cephalotaxus Medicinal Plants. Chin. J. Nat. Medicines19 (5), 321338. 10.1016/S1875-5364(21)60032-8

  • 37

    HuaC. L. (2004). Xanthoceras Nutrient and Comprehensive Processing. Food Inform. Technol.8, 2627.

  • 38

    HuangX.AtwoodC. S.HartshornM. A.MulthaupG.GoldsteinL. E.ScarpaR. C.et al (1999). The A Beta Peptide of Alzheimer's Disease Directly Produces Hydrogen Peroxide through Metal Ion Reduction. Biochemistry38, 76097616. 10.1021/bi990438f

  • 39

    HuangY. F.FengX. Z. (1987). Chemical Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge (I). Chin. Trad. Herb. Drugs18 (5), 710.

  • 40

    Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Health Department (1984). Inner Mongolia Mongolian Medicine Standard. Chifeng, China: Inner Mongolia Sci. Tech. Press, 377.

  • 41

    Institute of Tibetan medicine (1975). New Tibetan Medicine Formula. Lhasa, China: The Tibet people's Publishing House.

  • 42

    JiX. F.ChiT. Y.LiuP.LiL. Y.XuJ. K.XuQ.et al (2017). The Total Triterpenoid Saponins of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Improve Learning and Memory Impairments through against Oxidative Stress and Synaptic Damage. Phytomedicine25, 1524. 10.1016/j.phymed.2016.12.009

  • 43

    JiX. F.ChiT. Y.XuQ.HeX. L.ZhouX. Y.ZhangR.et al (2014). Xanthoceraside Ameliorates Mitochondrial Dysfunction Contributing to the Improvement of Learning and Memory Impairment in Mice with Intracerebroventricular Injection of Aβ1-42. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med.2014, 111. 10.1155/2014/969342

  • 44

    JiaoQ.ZouL.LiuP.XuQ.ZhangY.YuY.et al (2014). Xanthoceraside Induces Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells through the Activation of Caspases and the Suppression of the IGF-1R/Raf/MEK/ERK Signaling Pathway. J. Med. Food17 (10), 10701078. 10.1089/jmf.2013.3035

  • 45

    JinS. N.WenJ. F.KimH. Y.KangD. G.LeeH. S.ChoK. W.et al (2010). Vascular Relaxation by Ethanol Extract of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia via Akt- and SOCE-eNOS-cGMP Pathways. J. Ethnopharmacol.132, 240245. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.08.007

  • 46

    Jung JooY.Byung HyukH.Eun SikC.SeungN.Da HyeJ.Yun JungL.et al (2018). Involvement of Heme Oxygenase-1 Induction in Anti-vascular Inflammation Effects of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. J. Tradit Chin. Med.38 (6), 803814. 10.1016/S0254-6272(18)30979-8

  • 47

    KangY.-X.ZhangH.-C.WangP.LiuJ.-J.MaY.-M. (2012). Chemical Constituents of the Leaves from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chem. Nat. Compd.48 (5), 875876. 10.1007/s10600-012-0407-x

  • 48

    KeawsardS.NatakankitkulS.LiawruangrathS.TeerawutgulragA.TrisuwanK.CharoenyingP.et al (2012). Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of the Isolated Compounds from Solanum Spirale Roxb. Leaves. Chiang Mai. J. Sci.39, 445454.

  • 49

    KuangR.BaoW. F.ZhaoM. H.AnN. F.LiuY. L. (2001). The Anti Inflammatory Effects of the N-Butanol Extract of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.18 (1), 5356. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2858.2001.01.017

  • 50

    KuangR.LiuY. (2002). Effects of N-Butanol Extract of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge on Rat Model with Adjuvant Arthritis and its Mechanism. Trad. Chin. Drug Res. Clin. Pharm.13, 229231. 10.19378/j.issn.1003-9783.2002.04.013

  • 51

    LiJ.ZuY. G.LuoM.GuC. B.ZhaoC. J.EfferthT.et al (2013a). Aqueous Enzymatic Process Assisted by Microwave Extraction of Oil from Yellow Horn (Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge.) Seed Kernels and its Quality Evaluation. Food Chem.138, 21522158. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.12.011

  • 52

    LiJ. J.SunL. (2019). Clinical Application of Mongolian Medicine Sendeng-4 Decoction. J. Med. Pharm. Chin. Minorities.25 (4), 2829. 10.16041/j.cnki.cn15-1175.2019.04.01710.1007/s11655-019-3046-2

  • 53

    LiJ.ZuY.-G.FuY.-J.YangY.-C.LiS.-M.LiZ.-N.et al (2010). Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Triterpene Saponins from Defatted Residue of Yellow Horn (Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge.) Kernel and Evaluation of its Antioxidant Activity. Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Tech.11, 637643. 10.1016/j.ifset.2010.06.004

  • 54

    LiN.WangY.LiX.ZhangH.ZhouD.WangW.et al (2016a). Bioactive Phenols as Potential Neuroinflammation Inhibitors from the Leaves of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.26, 50185023. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.08.094

  • 55

    LiR. P.ZhangY. X.WangX. (2003). The Key Species for Returning farmland to forest in Arid and Semi-arid Areas of Northern China-Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Hebei For. Sci. Technol.21, 51.

  • 56

    LiS. R.ZhangW. T.TianZ. (2013b). Experimental Study about Mongolian Medicine Sendeng-4 on Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Rats. J. Inner Mongolia Med. Univ.35 (6), 479483. 10.16343/j.cnki.issn.2095-512x.2013.06.004

  • 57

    LiS. S.ZhuY. (2012). Research Progress of Anti-inflammatoy Action in Active Ingredient of Chinese Drugs. Chin. Arch. Tradit. Chin. Med.30, 143146. 10.13193/j.archtcm.2012.01.145.lishsh.05910.1002/cjoc.201290027

  • 58

    LiW.LiX.MengD. L.ZhangP.LiZ. L. (2007d). Two New Triterpenoids from the Carpophore of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.9, 711. 10.1080/10286020500289386

  • 59

    LiW.LiX.YangJ.LiL. H.LiN.MengD. L.et al (2006c). Two New Triterpenoids from the Carpophore of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Pharmazie61, 810811. 10.1080/10286020500289386

  • 60

    LiW.LiX.YangJ.MengD. L.LiN. (2008). Two New Triterpenoid Saponins from the Carpophore of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.10 (3), 285290. 10.1080/1028602070160522410.1080/10286020701782692

  • 61

    LiW.LuQ.LiX.LiuH.SunL.LuX.et al (2020). Anti-Alzheimer's Disease Activity of Secondary Metabolites from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Food Funct.11 (3), 20672079. 10.1039/c9fo01138b

  • 62

    LiW.LiX. (2008). Chemical Constituents in Carpophore of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chin. Trad. Herb. Drugs39 (3), 335337. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2670.2008.03.005

  • 63

    LiW.LiX.LiZ. L.ZhangP.XuJ.WangY.et al (2005a). Chemical Constituents of the Carpohore of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.22 (5), 345347. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2858.2005.05.008

  • 64

    LiW.LiX. (2014). Triterpenoid Saponins from the Carpophore of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chem. Nat. Compd.50 (1), 100102. 10.1007/s10600-014-0876-1

  • 65

    LiY.XuJ.XuP.SongS.LiuP.ChiT.et al (2016b). Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Extracts Ameliorate Dendritic Spine Deficiency and Cognitive Decline via Upregulation of BDNF Expression in a Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease. Neurosci. Lett.629, 208214. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.07.011

  • 66

    LiY.WangJ.ShengJ. G.LiuL.BargerS. W.JonesR. A.et al (1998). S100β Increases Levels of β-Amyloid Precursor Protein and its Encoding mRNA in Rat Neuronal Cultures. J. Neurochem.71, 14211428. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71041421.x

  • 67

    LiY. Y.XiangZ.CuiH.XiaoH.KangT. G.DouD. Q.et al (2013c). Two New Oleanane-type Saponins from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Nat. Prod. Res.27 (3), 208214. 10.1080/14786419.2012.666748

  • 68

    LiZ.-L.ZhaoD.-D.LiD.-Y. (2018). Spiro-isoxazolines from the Flowers of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Phytochemistry Lett.28, 149152. 10.1016/j.phytol.2018.10.009

  • 69

    LiZ. L.LiD. Y.HeX. M.HuaH. M. (2013d). Two New Triterpenoid Saponins from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Nat. Prod. Res.27 (3), 232237. 10.1080/14786419.2012.671316

  • 70

    LiZ. L.LiD. Y.LiX.LiN.MengD. L. (2006b). [A New Alkaloid from the Husk of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia]. Yao Xue Xue Bao41 (12), 11971200. 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2006.12.016

  • 71

    LiZ. L.LiX.LiD. Y.LiD.MengD. L.LiW.et al (2007c). Triterpenoid Prosapogenols and Prosapogenins from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.9 (4), 387392. 10.1080/10286020600782017

  • 72

    LiZ. L.LiX.LiL. H.LiN.YuM.MengD. L.et al (2005b). Two New Triterpenes from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Planta Med.71, 10681070. 10.1055/s-2005-873108

  • 73

    LiZ. L.BingL.FanC.LiF. L.ZouK. (2007a). Studies on the Chemical Constituents of the Spermoderm of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Lishizhen Med. Materia. Med. Res.18 (6), 13291330. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2007.06.025

  • 74

    LiZ. L.LiF. L.ZhangY. T.ZouK.ZhangX. J.WangJ. Z.et al (2007b). Inhibitory Activities against HIV-1 of Coumarins from the Seed coats of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Beijing For. Univ.29 (5), 7383. 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2007.05.010

  • 75

    LiZ. L. (2006a). Study on the Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge[dissertation]. Shenyang, China: Shenyang Pharmaceutical University.

  • 76

    LiangQ.FangH.LiuJ.ZhangB.BaoY.HouW.et al (2021). Analysis of the Nutritional Components in the Kernels of Yellowhorn (Xanthoceras Sorbifolium Bunge) Accessions. J. Food Compost. Anal.100 (3), 103925. 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103925

  • 77

    LinZ. L.LiX.ZhangP. (2004). Research Progress in the Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.21 (6), 472475. 10.1016/S0898-6568(03)00096-2

  • 78

    LiuP.ZouL.JiaoQ.ChiT.JiX.QiY.et al (2013). Xanthoceraside Attenuates Learning and Memory Deficits via Improving Insulin Signaling in STZ-Induced AD Rats. Neurosci. Lett.543, 115120. 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.065

  • 79

    LiuX. X.JiX. F.LuL. L.YangB. Z.WangL. H.ZouL. B.et al (2007a). Improvement of Ethanol Extract from Husk of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge on Rats with Learning and Memory Dysfunction. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs38 (12), 18591861. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2670.2007.12.034

  • 80

    LiuX. X.YangX. A.QuC.WuZ.YangB. Z.WangL. H.et al (2007b). Effects of Extracts from the Pericarp of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge on Learning and Memory Obstacle. Tradit. Chin. Drug Res. Clin. Pharma.18, 2325. 10.19378/j.issn.1003-9783.2007.01.008

  • 81

    LuP.MamiyaT.LuL.MouriA.IkejimaT.KimH. C.et al (2012). Xanthoceraside Attenuates Amyloid β Peptide₂₅₋₃₅-Induced Learning and Memory Impairments in Mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl)219, 181190. 10.1007/s00213-011-2386-1

  • 82

    MaC.NakamuraN.HattoriM.KakudaH.QiaoJ.YuH.et al (2000). Inhibitory Effects on HIV-1 Protease of Constituents from the wood of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. J. Nat. Prod.63, 238242. 10.1021/np9902441

  • 83

    MaC. M.NakamuraN. (2004). A Novel Protoilludane Sequiterpene from the wood of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Chin. Chem. Lett.15 (1), 6567.

  • 84

    MaT.KlannE. (2012). Amyloid β: Linking Synaptic Plasticity Failure to Memory Disruption in Alzheimer's Disease. J. Neurochem.120 Suppl 1, 140148. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07506.x

  • 85

    MantheyJ. A.GuthrieN. (2002). Antiproliferative Activities of Citrus Flavonoids against Six Human Cancer Cell Lines. J. Agric. Food Chem.50, 58375843. 10.1021/jf020121d

  • 86

    MengG. (1991). VALERIANELLA Miller. J. Shizhen Guoyi Guoyao.2, 84. 10.1016/b978-0-444-89215-7.50119-6

  • 87

    Ministry of Health of Shenyang Army Logistics Department (1970). The Handbook of Chinese Herbal Medicine Commonly Used in Northeast China. Shenyang, China: Xinhua Bookstore of Liaoning Province.

  • 88

    MouH. X.YuH. Y.HouX. C. (2008). Regular Distribution of Woody Energy Plant Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge in China. J. Anhui Agri. Sci.36 (9), 36263628. 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2008.09.151

  • 89

    National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (1999). Chinese Materia Medica. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers.

  • 90

    NiH. Y.ZhangZ. H. (2009). [Studies on the Chemical Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia]. Zhong Yao Cai32 (5), 702704. 10.13863/j.issn1001-4454.2009.05.039

  • 91

    PanyadeeA.SahakitpichanP.RuchirawatS.KanchanapoomT. (2015). 5-methyl Ether Flavone Glucosides from the Leaves of Bruguiera Gymnorrhiza. Phytochemistry Lett.11, 215219. 10.1016/j.phytol.2014.12.021

  • 92

    Pharmacopoeia Committee of the Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China (1998). The Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China Drug Standards. Beijing, China: Mongolian Med.

  • 93

    QiY.JiX. F.ChiT. Y.LiuP.JinG.XuQ..et al (2017). Xanthoceraside Attenuates Amyloid β Peptide1-42-Induced Memory Impairments by Reducing Neuroinflammatory Responses in Mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol.820, 1830. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.11.045

  • 94

    QiY.ZouL.-B.WangL.-H.JinG.PanJ.-J.ChiT.-Y.et al (2013). Xanthoceraside Inhibits Pro-inflammatory Cytokine Expression in Aβ25-35/ifn-γ-Stimulated Microglia through the TLR2 Receptor, MyD88, Nuclear Factor-Κb, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways. J. Pharmacol. Sci.122 (4), 305317. 10.1254/jphs.13031fp

  • 95

    QuW.ChenJ. P.TianS. Y. (2000). Poptosis Induced by β-amyloid Protein in Rat Brain and protection by Melatonin in the Rat Brains. Chin. J. Neurol.33 (1), 729.

  • 96

    RajendiranV.NatarajanV.DevarajS. N. (2018). Anti-inflammatory Activity of Alpinia Officinarum Hance on Rat colon Inflammation and Tissue Damage in DSS Induced Acute and Chronic Colitis Models. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness7 (4), 273281. 10.1016/j.fshw.2018.10.004

  • 97

    RongW.DingK.GuoS.XieF.LiQ.BiK. (2019). Metabolomics Analysis of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Husks protection of Rats against Alzheimer's Disease Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.1126-1127, 121739. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121739

  • 98

    RongW.DingK.GuoS.YuanZ.LiQ.BiK. (2018). A Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Based Strategy to Fast Screen Triterpenoids in Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge Husks for Bioactive Substances against Alzheimer's Disease. RSC Adv.8 (27), 1473214739. 10.1039/C8RA01765D

  • 99

    SiQ. (1996). Good Effect on Acne of WenGuanMu Sanwei Decoction. Chin. Folk Therapy. (6), 3031. 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.1996.06.041

  • 100

    SmallD. M.CoombesJ. S.BennettN.JohnsonD. W.GobeG. C. (2012). Oxidative Stress, Anti-oxidant Therapies and Chronic Kidney Disease. Nephrology (Carlton)17 (4), 311321. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01572.x

  • 101

    SunZ.LiQ.BiK. (2018). Rapid HPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Neurotransmitters in the Brain Tissue of Alzheimer's Disease Rats before and after Oral Administration of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Molecules23 (12), 3111. 10.3390/molecules23123111

  • 102

    TestaiL. (2015). Flavonoids and Mitochondrial Pharmacology: A New Paradigm for Cardioprotection. Life Sci.135, 6876. 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.04.017

  • 103

    TianY. H.YaoZ. B.ZhouL. H.XieY. (2001). Aβ5-35 and Apo E4 Enhance Neuronal Intracellular Free Ca2+. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull.7 (1), 5761. 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1978.2001.01.017

  • 104

    UttaraB.SinghA. V.ZamboniP.MahajanR. T. (2009). Oxidative Stress and Neurodegenerative Diseases: a Review of Upstream and Downstream Antioxidant Therapeutic Options. Curr. Neuropharmacol.7 (1), 6574. 10.2174/157015909787602823

  • 105

    Venegas-CalerónM.Ruíz-MéndezM. V.Martínez-ForceE.GarcésR.SalasJ. J. (2017). Characterization of Xanthoceras Sorbifolium Bunge Seeds: Lipids, Proteins and Saponins Content. Ind. Crops Prod.109, 192198. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.022

  • 106

    WanG. S.RenY. H.GaoH. Y.BaiS.XiR. G.WangX. B.et al (2015). Isolation and Identification of Chemical Constituents from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolium Bunge. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.32 (1), 1821. 10.14066/j.cnki.cn21-1349/r.2015.01.004

  • 107

    WanG. S.WangX. B.WuL. J.GaoH. Y. (2013). Advances in Studies on Chemical Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia and Their Pharmacological Activities. Chin. Tradit. Herbal. Drugs13 (44), 18421851. 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2013.13.027

  • 108

    WanQ. F.HeJ. F.ZhangW. H. (2010). Distribution and Bio-Ecological Characteristics of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Acta Agric. Boreali-occidentalis Sin.19 (9), 179185. 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.40486

  • 109

    WangD.SuD.YuB.ChenC.ChengL.LiX.et al (2016b). Novel Anti-tumour Barringenol-like Triterpenoids from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge and Their Three Dimensional Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships Analysis. Fitoterapia116, 5160. 10.1016/j.fitote.2016.11.002

  • 110

    WangD.YuB.ChenC.DuanJ.DiD.XiongX.et al (2018). New Natural Barrigenol-like Triterpenoid Isolated from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Nat. Prod. Res.32 (9), 9971003. 10.1080/14786419.2017.1375916

  • 111

    WangD.SuD.LiX.-Z.LiuD.XiR.-G.GaoH.-Y.et al (2016a). Barrigenol Triterpenes from the Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge and Their Antitumor Activities. RSC Adv.6 (33), 2743427446. 10.1039/c6ra02706g

  • 112

    WangH. D. (1998). Research Progress on the Chemical Composition and Comprehensive Utilization of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Chin. Wild Plant Resour.17 (1), 1316.

  • 113

    WangY.JiangS.MengD. L.LiN. (2011). Advances in Study on Chemical and Biological Activity of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Drugs Clin.26 (04), 269273. 10.7501/j.issn.1674-5515

  • 114

    WuD. D. (2017). Isolation and Identification of the Chemical Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia wood and Pharmacokinetic Investigation of its Seven Major Chemical Constituents. China: Inner Mongolia Univ. Inner Mongolia.

  • 115

    XiaoW.WangY.ZhangP.LiN.JiangS.WangJ. H.et al (2013). Bioactive Barrigenol Type Triterpenoids from the Leaves of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Eur. J. Med. Chem.60, 263270. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.12.022

  • 116

    XieZ. W. (1996). National Chinese Herbal Medicine Compilation. Beijing, China: People's Medical Publishing House.

  • 117

    XieZ.ZhangW.LiuX. (2010). Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Seedlings under Soil Drought Stress. Acta Bot. Boreali-occidentalia Sin.30 (05), 948954. 10.3724/SP.J.1231.2010.06705

  • 118

    XuD. X.YuH. Z. (2010). Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Biology. Beijing: Sci. Press.

  • 119

    XuJ. K.ZhangW.LiY. J.JiX. F.ChiT. Y.ZouL. B.et al (2014). Effects of Xanthoceraside on Focal Cerebral Ischemiareperfusion Injury in Rats and the Preliminary Mechanism Study. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.31 (10), 793798. 10.14066/j.cnki.cn21-1349/r.2014.10.008

  • 120

    YanD. J. (2007). Study on Xanthoceras Sorborifolia Resources and its Development Utilization in China. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci.35 (3), 1517. 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2007.03.004

  • 121

    YanM. H.LiP. W.XiongL. Z. (1984). Isolation, Estimation and Identification of the Sterols in Unsaponifiable Fraction of the Oil from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Sci. Silvae Sin.20 (4), 389396.

  • 122

    YangA.ZhangF.MaS.QiG.ShangH.ZhengZ.et al (2020a). Chemical Constituents of the Fruit Husk of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chem. Nat. Compd.56 (2), 325327. 10.1007/s10600-020-03020-3

  • 123

    YangC. Y.HaW.LinY.JiangK.YangJ. L.ShiY. P.et al (2016a). Polyphenols Isolated from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Husks and Their Anti-tumor and Radical-Scavenging Activities. Molecules21 (12), 1694. 10.3390/molecules21121694

  • 124

    YangC. Y.YangJ. L.HaW.ShiY. P. (2016b). Advances in Studies on Chemical Constituents from Husks of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia and Their Biological Activities. Chin. Tradit. Herbal Drugs47 (8), 14181424. 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2016.08.029

  • 125

    YangL.HouA.ZhangJ.WangS.ManW.YuH.et al (2020b). Panacis Quinquefolii Radix: A Review of the Botany, Phytochemistry, Quality Control, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Industrial Applications Research Progress. Front. Pharmacol.11. 10.3389/fphar.2020.602092

  • 126

    YaoZ.-Y.QiJ.-H.YinL.-M. (2013). Biodiesel Production from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia in China: Opportunities and Challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev.24, 5765. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.047

  • 127

    YiN.WangX. M.DingL. J. (2011). Ultrasonic Treatment of Activated Carbon Made by Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge Husk and Their Use on Methylene Blue Adsorption. J. Northeast. Agric. Univ.42 (11), 7782. 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2011.11.014

  • 128

    YuL.TangX.ChenL.WangM.JianJ.CaoS.et al (2012b). Oleanane-type Triterpenoid Saponins from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Fitoterapia83 (8), 16361642. 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.09.015

  • 129

    YuL.WangX.WeiX.WangM.ChenL.CaoS.et al (2012a). Triterpenoid Saponins from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge and Their Inhibitory Activity on Human Cancer Cell Lines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.22 (16), 52325238. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.06.061

  • 130

    YuL.LiuJ.YuL.ChenL.QiuF. (2018). Chemical Constituents of Seed Oil Leavings of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chem. Nat. Compd.54 (4), 769771. 10.1007/s10600-018-2469-x

  • 131

    ZhangH.ZhouQ. (2013a). Tyrosinase Inhibitory Effects and Antioxidative Activities of Saponins from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Nutshell. Plos. ONE.8 (8), e70090. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070090

  • 132

    ZhangH. M.GengJ.ZhouQ. C. (2013). Tyrosinase Inhibitory Effects of Flavonoids from Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Nutshell. Chin. J. Cereals. Oils.28 (10), 96100.

  • 133

    ZhangQ. L.YanG.YangZ. Q.WangB.ZhangM. H.LiuL.et al (2012). The Biological Characteristics and Economic Value of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia and its Development and Utilization Prospects. Agric. Sci. Technol.10, 202203.

  • 134

    ZhangS.ZuY. G.FuY. J.LuoM.LiuW.LiJ.et al (2010). Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Seed Oil from Yellow Horn (Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge.) and its Anti-oxidant Activity. Bioresour. Technol.101 (7), 25372544. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.082

  • 135

    ZhangW. X.BaoW. F. (2000). Studies on the Chemical Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Acta Pharm. Sin.35 (2), 124127. 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2000.02.010

  • 136

    ZhangX.GuoS.HoC.-T.BaiN. (2020). Phytochemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Longan (Dimocarpus Longan Lour.) Fruit: A Review. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness9 (2), 95102. 10.1016/j.fshw.2020.03.001

  • 137

    ZhangY.MaJ. N.MaC. L.QiZ.MaC. M. (2015). Simultaneous Quantification of Ten Constituents of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge Using UHPLC-MS Methods and Evaluation of Their Radical Scavenging, DNA Scission Protective, and α-glucosidase Inhibitory Activities. Chin. J. Nat. Med.13 (11), 873880. 10.1016/S1875-5364(15)30092-3

  • 138

    ZhangY. L.XiaoH. F.ShiH. X.SongZ. X.TangZ. S. (2017). Antioxidant Activity of Fruit Shells of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge and Screening of Active Components Inhibiting Proliferation of HepG2 Cell Line. Mod. Chin. Med. Nov.19 (11), 15721574. 10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.2017.11.015

  • 139

    ZhangZ. Y.WangK.LiH.LiuJ. Y.DengH.QiN. (2016). Antioxidant and Anti-hepatoma Activities of Total Saponins from Kernel of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev.28, 10121019. 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2016.7.005

  • 140

    ZhaoC. Y.SuH.ZhaoY. S. (2008). Comprehensive Development and Utilization Value of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Inner Mongol. For. Invest. Des.31 (6), 118119.

  • 141

    ZhaoD. D.LiD. Y.HuH. M.LiZ. L. (2013). A New Monoterpenoid Isolated from Flowers of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia. Chin. Tradit. Herbal Drugs44 (1), 1115. 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2013.01.003

  • 142

    ZhaoD. D.LiD. Y.WeiJ. X.HuH. M.LiZ. L. (2012). Isolation and Structural Identification of the Chemical Constituents from the Flowers of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ.29 (7), 514518. 10.14066/j.cnki.cn21-1349/r.2012.07.002

  • 143

    ZhaoL.LiX.YeZ. Q.ZhangF.HanJ. J.YangT.et al (2018). Nutshell Extracts of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia: a New Potential Source of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds as a Natural Antioxidant and Immunomodulator. J. Agric. Food Chem.66 (15), 37833792. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05590

  • 144

    ZhouH.TaiJ.XuH.LuX.MengD. (2019). Xanthoceraside Could Ameliorate Alzheimer's Disease Symptoms of Rats by Affecting the Gut Microbiota Composition and Modulating the Endogenous Metabolite Levels. Front. Pharmacol.10, 1035. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01035

  • 145

    ZhuH. J.YuL. L.LiuJ. C.WangM. Y.ZhangT.FengQ.et al (2018). A New Coumarin Glucoside Ester from Seeds Oil Leavings of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia Bunge. Chin. Tradit. Herbal Drugs11, 113115. 10.1016/j.chmed.2018.09.003

Summary

Keywords

Xanthoceras sorbifolium, medicinal plants, phytochemistry, pharmacology, applications

Citation

Zang E, Qiu B, Chen N, Li C, Liu Q, Zhang M, Liu Y and Li M (2021) Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge: A Review on Botany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 12:708549. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.708549

Received

12 May 2021

Accepted

16 August 2021

Published

30 August 2021

Volume

12 - 2021

Edited by

Alejandro Urzua, University of Santiago, Chile

Reviewed by

Junwei He, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China

Guang-Bo Ge, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Minhui Li,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics