ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 24 January 2022

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.784822

Confirmation of inhibitingTLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signalling Pathway by Duhuo Jisheng Decoction on Osteoarthritis: A Network Pharmacology Approach-Integrated Experimental Study

  • 1. College of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China

  • 2. Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China

  • 3. College of Pharmacy Science, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China

  • 4. Fujian Key Laboratory of Integrative Medicine on Geriatrics, Fuzhou, China

Article metrics

View details

29

Citations

4,7k

Views

3,3k

Downloads

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify whether the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway plays a vital role in osteoarthritis (OA) treatment with Duhuo Jisheng Decoction (DHJSD) on the basis of a network pharmacology approach (NPA)-integrated experiment. Two experiments were conducted as follow: NPA for DHJSD using six OA-related gene series and the key pathway was screened out using NPA. NPA identified a vital role for the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway in OA treatment with DHJSD, the conventional western blot analysis and qPCR confirmed it. Furthermore, changes of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p in the cellular models were recovered by DHJSD administration, which synergistically contributed to OA therapy. The toll-like receptor signalling pathway and the NF-κB signalling pathway were meaningfully enriched by the miRNA-regulated gene pathways. This study identified and confirmed the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway is an essential inflammatory signalling pathway in the DHJSD underlying OA treatment. The results provide a basis for further evaluation of the regulatory mechanism of the drug’s efficacy in treating OA.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive, degenerative disease characterised by inflammation-driven cartilage degradation in the elderly (Kwon et al., 2018; Funck-Brentano et al., 2019; Peat and Thomas, 2021). OA resulting in joint chronic pain and disability can lead to remarkable reduction of the quality of life, which poses an increasing socioeconomic and healthcare burden. However, prolonged use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for OA treatment may lead to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal side effects (UK NCGC, 2014; Latourte et al., 2020). Pharmacological treatments for OA are aimed at alleviating the clinical symptoms rather than treating the underlying causes. Hence it is in desperate need of more effective and safer therapeutic approaches to reduce chronic pain and functional recovery of joint in patients with OA.

In the field of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), Chinese herbal medicine has a deep history and special features for OA treatment, and it has been explored to be effective in improving clinical symptoms with few side effects. Duhuo Jisheng Decoction (DHJSD) has been widely used to treat OA in China, and has been confirmed to relieve OA-related symptoms in several clinical trials (Zhang et al., 2016). Studies have shown that DHJSD could alleviate OA by suppressing inflammation and chondrocyte apoptosis (Liu et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2020). Our previous studies shown that DHJSD inhibits chondrocyte apoptosis by affect the mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathway (Liu et al., 2014) and suppresses the endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis (Lin et al., 2015). Some clues about the pharmacological mechanism of DHJSD have been provided, indicating that its pharmacological efficacy may through the synergistic actions of the multi-ingredients modulating multi-pathways. Nevertheless, the specific pharmacological mechanisms of DHJSD and their interaction with OA-related targets and pathways is not yet elucidated and require further investigation.

Network pharmacology approach (NPA), a novel and powerful strategy, integrates chemo-informatics, bio-informatics, network biology, network analysis and traditional pharmacology, which conforms to an organic whole or the holistic view of TCM theory and elucidates the active compounds and potential mechanisms of TCM formulas. Classical network pharmacology explores molecular targets from the ingredients of the complex herbal formulation and the target disease, simultaneously and refines the intersections between the formulations and disease to identify the therapeutic molecular targets (Lai et al., 2020). NPA has been beneficial in elucidating the interrelationship of the compounds and construct the compound, compound target, and target disease networks to exploring the possible mechanisms of multi-component and multi-target drugs (Liu et al., 2016). Jian et al. used NPA to investigate the effects of Eucommia ulmoides-Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae (EU-RAB) in OA, showed that TNF, MAPK, PI3K/AKT and IL-17 signalling pathways may be pathway that EU-RAB affects in OA (Jian et al., 2020). Zhu et al. reported that cell cycle, cell apoptosis, immune modulation, inflammation and drug metabolism maybe the pathway that Shaoyao Gancao (SGD) affects in OA by NPA analysis (Zhu et al., 2019). Recently, Zhang et al. found that virus-related, apoptotic, IL-17 and PI3K/Akt signalling pathway are involved in the mechanisms of Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae in treating acute OA using NPA (Zhang et al., 2020), Huang et al. used NPA and found that Simiao may exert its effect on multi-pathway such as IL-17 signalling pathway, HIF-1 signalling pathway, Toll-like receptor signalling pathway and TNF signalling pathway (Huang et al., 2020). In our previous study, we also used NPA and OA in a cellular model and found that the NF-κB signalling pathway was the important inflammatory signalling pathway involved in the mechanism of Bushen Zhuangjin Decoction (BZD) in treating OA (Xu et al., 2021). These studies had focused on investigating the potential molecular targets and mechanisms of a certain herbal formulation using NPA. Therefore, using NPA-integrated experimental to acquire the bioactive components, targets and the underlying mechanisms of DHJSD in treating OA. The following two experiments were designed: 1) network pharmacology for DHJSD and 2) variation of the pathway detected from network pharmacology and confirming the key signalling pathway of DHJSD on a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced OA cellular model. This study provides a newish approach to understand the theoretical basis of DHJSD in treating OA.

Methods and Materials

Preliminary Exploration of the Bioactive Components of DHJSD

Preparation of DHJSD

DHJSD is formed from 15 Chinese medical plants, including Duhuo (DH) [Angelica biserrata (Shan et Yuan) Yuan et Shan], Sang Ji Sheng (SJS) [Taxillus chinensis (DC.) Danser], Qin Jian (QJ) [Gentiana Macrophylla Pall.], Fang Feng (FF) [Saposhnikovia divaricata (Turcz.) Schischk.], Xi Xin (XX) [Manchurian Wildginger], Chuan Xiong (CX) [Szechuan Lovage Rhizome], Dang Gui (DG) [Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels.], Shu Di Huang (SDH) [Rehmanniaglutinosa (Gaertn.) DC.], Bai Shao (BS) [Paeonia lactiflora Pall], Rou Gui (RG) [Cortex Cinnamomi Cassiae], Fu Ling (FL) [Smilax glabra Roxb], Du Zhong (DZ) [Eucommia ulmoides Oliv], Niu Xi (NX) [Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae], Dang Shen (DS) [Root of Pilose Asiabell], Gan Cao (GC) [Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.], were obtained from the Third People’s Hospital affiliated to the Fujian University of TCM (Fuzhou, China). Regarding the ratio of DHJSD (Supplementary Table S1), 90 g of herbal powder was soaked in 720 ml distilled water and boiled three times for 2 h, and the extracts were filtered. The filtrate was completely evaporated on a rotary evaporator (RE-2000; Shanghai Yarong Biochemistry Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China), dried in vacuum drying oven until it was constant weight, and then stored at −20 °C (DZF-300; Shanghai Yiheng Scientific Instrument Co., Shanghai, China). The DHJSD solid dry matter was dissolved in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (HyClone, Logan, UT, United States) and then filtered through a 0.22 µm filter. When used, was prepared as necessary. The extracts of DHJSD were detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprint on an Agilent 1200 HPLC system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA,United States) using an Agilent 5 TC-C18 (250 × 4.6 mm). The conditions for the analysis were acetonitrile (A) 0.2% phosphoric acid water (B) as a mobile phase, a detection wavelength at 230 nm for paeoniflorin (peak 1) (purity 98%), ligustrazine hydrochloride (peak 2) (purity 98%) and osthole (peak 3) (purity 98%) (China Institute of Food and Drug Test, Beijing, China) (Supplementary Figure S1), with flow rate of 0.8 ml/min under column temperature.

Screening of the Bioactive Components of DHJSD

All DHJSD components were explored using the TCM systems pharmacology database and analysis platform (TCMSP, https://tcmspw.com/tcmsp.php). The chemical composition of TCM was screened based on oral bioavailability (OB ≥ 30%) and drug-likeness (DL ≥ 0.18). The OB value describe the relative amount drug which was absorbed into the systemic blood circulation, through the extravascular route. DL means the degree of similarity between bioactive component and a known drug, and the class of compounds with the potential for drug development. Moreover, 206 eligible DHJSD compounds were obtained from the TCM systems pharmacology database, and considered as candidate compounds (Table 1), including 9 for DH, 2 for QJ, 2 for SJS, 8 for XX, 0 for RG, 18 for FF, 15 for FL, 2 for SDH, 20 for NX, 21 for DS, 28 for DZ, 7 for CX, 2 for DG, 13 for BS and 92 for GC.

TABLE 1

IDNameOBDLHerb
MOL003608O-Acetylcolumbianetin60.040.26DH
MOL004777Angelol D34.850.34DH
MOL004778[(1R,2R)-2,3-dihydroxy-1-(7-methoxy-2-oxochromen-6-yl)-3-methylbutyl] (Z)-2-methylbut-2-enoate46.030.34DH
MOL004780Angelicone30.990.19DH
MOL004782[(1R,2R)-2,3-dihydroxy-1-(7-methoxy-2-oxochromen-6-yl)-3-methylbutyl] 3-methylbutanoate45.190.34DH
MOL004792Nodakenin57.120.69DH
MOL000011(2R,3R)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-phenyl)-5-methoxy-2-methylol-2,3-dihydropyrano[5,6-h][1,4]benzodioxin-9-one68.830.66FF
MOL01173011-hydroxy-sec-o-beta-d-glucosylhamaudol_qt50.240.27FF
MOL011732Anomalin59.650.66FF
MOL011737Divaricatacid870.32FF
MOL011740Divaricatol31.650.38FF
MOL011747Ledebouriellol32.050.51FF
MOL011749Phelloptorin43.390.28FF
MOL0117535-O-Methylvisamminol37.990.25FF
MOL002644Phellopterin40.190.28FF
MOL003588Prangenidin36.310.22FF
MOL013077Decursin39.270.38FF
MOL0121404,9-dimethoxy-1-vinyl-$b-carboline65.30.19XX
MOL012141Caribine37.060.83XX
MOL001460Cryptopin78.740.72XX
MOL001558Sesamin56.550.83XX
MOL002501[(1S)-3-[(E)-but-2-enyl]-2-methyl-4-oxo-1-cyclopent-2-enyl] (1R,3R)-3-[(E)-3-methoxy-2-methyl-3-oxoprop-1-enyl]-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylate62.520.31XX
MOL002962(3S)-7-hydroxy-3-(2,3,4-trimethoxyphenyl)chroman-4-one48.230.33XX
MOL009849ZINC0522392931.570.83XX
MOL002135Myricanone40.60.51CX
MOL002151Senkyunone47.660.24CX
MOL002157Wallichilide42.310.71CX
MOL000433FA68.960.71CX
MOL001918Paeoniflorgenone87.590.37BS
MOL001925Paeoniflorin_qt68.180.4BS
MOL001928Albiflorin_qt66.640.33BS
MOL00191011alpha,12alpha-epoxy-3beta-23-dihydroxy-30-norolean-20-en-28,12beta-olide64.770.38BS
MOL000492(+)-catechin54.830.24BS
MOL001924Paeoniflorin53.870.79BS
MOL001921Lactiflorin49.120.8BS
MOL001919(3S,5R,8R,9R,10S,14S)-3,17-dihydroxy-4,4,8,10,14-pentamethyl-2,3,5,6,7,9-hexahydro-1H-cyclopenta [a]phenanthrene-15,16-dione43.560.53BS
MOL001930Benzoyl paeoniflorin31.270.75BS
MOL000273(2R)-2-[(3S,5R,10S,13R,14R,16R,17R)-3,16-dihydroxy-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-2,3,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydro-1H-cyclopenta [a]phenanthren-17-yl]-6-methylhept-5-enoic acid30.930.81FL
MOL000275Trametenolic acid38.710.8FL
MOL0002767,9 (11)-dehydropachymic acid35.110.81FL
MOL000279Cerevisterol37.960.77FL
MOL000280(2R)-2-[(3S,5R,10S,13R,14R,16R,17R)-3,16-dihydroxy-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-2,3,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydro-1H-cyclopenta [a]phenanthren-17-yl]-5-isopropyl-hex-5-enoic acid31.070.82FL
MOL000282Ergosta-7,22E-dien-3beta-ol43.510.72FL
MOL000283Ergosterol peroxide40.360.81FL
MOL000285(2R)-2-[(5R,10S,13R,14R,16R,17R)-16-hydroxy-3-keto-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-1,2,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydrocyclopenta [a]phenanthren-17-yl]-5-isopropyl-hex-5-enoic acid38.260.82FL
MOL0002873beta-Hydroxy-24-methylene-8-lanostene-21-oic acid38.70.81FL
MOL000289Pachymic acid33.630.81FL
MOL000290Poricoic acid A30.610.76FL
MOL000291Poricoic acid B30.520.75FL
MOL000292Poricoic acid C38.150.75FL
MOL000296Hederagenin36.910.75FL
MOL000300Dehydroeburicoic acid44.170.83FL
MOL00205840957-99-157.20.62DZ
MOL004367Olivil62.230.41DZ
MOL000443Erythraline49.180.55DZ
MOL005922Acanthoside B43.350.77DZ
MOL006709AIDS21463492.430.55DZ
MOL000073Ent-Epicatechin48.960.24DZ
MOL007563Yangambin57.530.81DZ
MOL009007Eucommin A30.510.85DZ
MOL009009(+)-medioresinol87.190.62DZ
MOL009015(-)-Tabernemontanine58.670.61DZ
MOL009027Cyclopamine55.420.82DZ
MOL009029Dehydrodiconiferyl alcohol 4,gamma'-di-O-beta-D-glucopyanoside_qt51.440.4DZ
MOL009030Dehydrodieugenol30.10.24DZ
MOL009031Cinchonan-9-al, 6′-methoxy- (9R)-68.220.4DZ
MOL009038GBGB45.580.83DZ
MOL009042Helenalin77.010.19DZ
MOL009047(+)-Eudesmin33.290.62DZ
MOL0090534-[(2S,3R)-5-[(E)-3-hydroxyprop-1-enyl]-7-methoxy-3-methylol-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-yl]-2-methoxy-phenol50.760.39DZ
MOL009055Hirsutin_qt49.810.37DZ
MOL009057Liriodendrin_qt53.140.8DZ
MOL002773Beta-carotene37.180.58DZ
MOL008240(E)-3-[4-[(1R,2R)-2-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-phenyl)-1-methylol-ethoxy]-3-methoxy-phenyl]acrolein56.320.36DZ
MOL011604Syringetin36.820.37DZ
MOL01246128-norolean-17-en-3-ol35.930.78NX
MOL012505Bidentatoside, ii_qt31.760.59NX
MOL012542β-ecdysterone44.230.82NX
MOL001454Berberine36.860.78NX
MOL001458Coptisine30.670.86NX
MOL002643Delta 7-stigmastenol37.420.75NX
MOL002714Baicalein33.520.21NX
MOL002776Baicalin40.120.75NX
MOL002897Epiberberine43.090.78NX
MOL003847Inophyllum E38.810.85NX
MOL000785Palmatine64.60.65NX
MOL000085Beta-daucosterol_qt36.910.75NX
MOL012537Spinoside A41.750.4NX
MOL008406Spinoside A39.970.4DS
MOL002879Diop43.590.39DS
MOL003036ZINC0397878143.830.76DS
MOL004492Chrysanthemaxanthin38.720.58DS
MOL005321Frutinone A65.90.34DS
MOL000006Luteolin36.160.25DS
MOL006554Taraxerol38.40.77DS
MOL006774Stigmast-7-enol37.420.75DS
MOL0083915alpha-Stigmastan-3,6-dione33.120.79DS
MOL0083937-(beta-Xylosyl)cephalomannine_qt38.330.29DS
MOL008397Daturilin50.370.77DS
MOL008400Glycitein50.480.24DS
MOL008407(8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-17-[(E,2R,5S)-5-ethyl-6-methylhept-3-en-2-yl]-10,13-dimethyl-1,2,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydrocyclopenta [a]phenanthren-3-one45.40.76DS
MOL00841111-Hydroxyrankinidine400.66DS
MOL001484Inermine75.180.54GC
MOL001792DFV32.760.18GC
MOL002311Glycyrol90.780.67GC
MOL000239Jaranol50.830.29GC
MOL002565Medicarpin49.220.34GC
MOL000354Isorhamnetin49.60.31GC
MOL003656Lupiwighteone51.640.37GC
MOL000392Formononetin69.670.21GC
MOL000417Calycosin47.750.24GC
MOL004328Naringenin59.290.21GC
MOL004805(2S)-2-[4-hydroxy-3-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)phenyl]-8,8-dimethyl-2,3-dihydropyrano [2,3-f]chromen-4-one31.790.72GC
MOL004806Euchrenone30.290.57GC
MOL004808Glyasperin B65.220.44GC
MOL004810Glyasperin F75.840.54GC
MOL004811Glyasperin C45.560.4GC
MOL004814Isotrifoliol31.940.42GC
MOL004815(E)-1-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-(2,2-dimethylchromen-6-yl)prop-2-en-1-one39.620.35GC
MOL004820Kanzonols W50.480.52GC
MOL004824(2S)-6-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-4-methoxy-2,3-dihydrofuro [3,2-g]chromen-7-one60.250.63GC
MOL004827Semilicoisoflavone B48.780.55GC
MOL004828Glepidotin A44.720.35GC
MOL004829Glepidotin B64.460.34GC
MOL004833Phaseolinisoflavan32.010.45GC
MOL004835Glypallichalcone61.60.19GC
MOL0048388-(6-hydroxy-2-benzofuranyl)-2,2-dimethyl-5-chromenol58.440.38GC
MOL004841Licochalcone B76.760.19GC
MOL004848Licochalcone G49.250.32GC
MOL0048493-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-8-(1,1-dimethylprop-2-enyl)-7-hydroxy-5-methoxy-coumarin59.620.43GC
MOL004855Licoricone63.580.47GC
MOL004856Gancaonin A51.080.4GC
MOL004857Gancaonin B48.790.45GC
MOL004860Licorice glycoside E32.890.27GC
MOL0048633-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-8-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)chromone66.370.41GC
MOL0048645,7-dihydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)chromone30.490.41GC
MOL0048662-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-6-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)chromone44.150.41GC
MOL004879Glycyrin52.610.47GC
MOL004882Licocoumarone33.210.36GC
MOL004883Licoisoflavone41.610.42GC
MOL004884Licoisoflavone B38.930.55GC
MOL004885Licoisoflavanone52.470.54GC
MOL004891Shinpterocarpin80.30.73GC
MOL004898(E)-3-[3,4-dihydroxy-5-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)phenyl]-1-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one46.270.31GC
MOL004903Liquiritin65.690.74GC
MOL004904Licopyranocoumarin80.360.65GC
MOL0049053,22-Dihydroxy-11-oxo-delta (12)-oleanene-27-alpha-methoxycarbonyl-29-oic acid34.320.55GC
MOL004907Glyzaglabrin61.070.35GC
MOL004908Glabridin53.250.47GC
MOL004910Glabranin52.90.31GC
MOL004911Glabrene46.270.44GC
MOL004912Glabrone52.510.5GC
MOL0049131,3-dihydroxy-9-methoxy-6-benzofurano [3,2-c]chromenone48.140.43GC
MOL0049141,3-dihydroxy-8,9-dimethoxy-6-benzofurano [3,2-c]chromenone62.90.53GC
MOL004915Eurycarpin A43.280.37GC
MOL004917Glycyroside37.250.79GC
MOL004924(-)-Medicocarpin40.990.95GC
MOL004935Sigmoidin-B34.880.41GC
MOL004941(2R)-7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chroman-4-one71.120.18GC
MOL004945(2S)-7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)chroman-4-one36.570.32GC
MOL004948Isoglycyrol44.70.84GC
MOL004949Isolicoflavonol45.170.42GC
MOL004957HMO38.370.21GC
MOL0049591-Methoxyphaseollidin69.980.64GC
MOL004961Quercetin der46.450.33GC
MOL0049663′-Hydroxy-4′-O-Methylglabridin43.710.57GC
MOL000497Licochalcone a40.790.29GC
MOL0049743′-Methoxyglabridin46.160.57GC
MOL0049782-[(3R)-8,8-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano [6,5-f]chromen-3-yl]-5-methoxyphenol36.210.52GC
MOL004980Inflacoumarin A39.710.33GC
MOL004985Icos-5-enoic acid30.70.2GC
MOL004988Kanzonol F32.470.89GC
MOL0049896-prenylated eriodictyol39.220.41GC
MOL0049907,2′,4′-trihydroxy-5-methoxy-3-arylcoumarin83.710.27GC
MOL0049917-Acetoxy-2-methylisoflavone38.920.26GC
MOL0049938-prenylated eriodictyol53.790.4GC
MOL004996Gadelaidic acid30.70.2GC
MOL000500Vestitol74.660.21GC
MOL005000Gancaonin G60.440.39GC
MOL005001Gancaonin H50.10.78GC
MOL005003Licoagrocarpin58.810.58GC
MOL005007Glyasperins M72.670.59GC
MOL005008Glycyrrhiza flavonol A41.280.6GC
MOL005012Licoagroisoflavone57.280.49GC
MOL00501318α-hydroxyglycyrrhetic acid41.160.71GC
MOL005016Odoratin49.950.3GC
MOL005017Phaseol78.770.58GC
MOL005018Xambioona54.850.87GC
MOL005020Dehydroglyasperins C53.820.37GC
MOL000098Quercetin46.430.28DZ/SJS
MOL000098Quercetin46.430.28GC/NX
MOL000173Wogonin30.680.23FF/NX
MOL000211Mairin55.380.78BS/DZ/GC
MOL000358Beta-sitosterol36.910.75DH/QJ/FF/DG/BS/DZ/NX
MOL000359Sitosterol36.910.75SJS/QJ/FF/CX/SDH/BS/GC
MOL000422Kaempferol41.880.24XX/BS/DZ/NX/GC
MOL000449Stigmasterol43.830.76DG/SDH/NX/DS
MOL001006poriferasta-7,22E-dien-3beta-ol42.980.76NX/DS
MOL001494Mandenol420.19FF/CX
MOL001941Ammidin34.550.22DH/FF
MOL001942Isoimperatorin45.460.23DH/FF
MOL002140Perlolyrine65.950.27CX/DS
MOL0038967-Methoxy-2-methyl isoflavone42.560.2DS/GC
MOL004355Spinasterol42.980.76NX/DS
MOL0070593-beta-Hydroxymethyllenetanshiquinone32.160.41DZ/DS
MOL007514Methyl icosa-11,14-dienoate39.670.23FF/DS

The final selected compounds of DuHuo JiSheng Decoction for analysis.

OB, oral bioavailability; DL, drug-likeness; DH, Du Huo; SJS, Sang Ji Sheng; QJ, Qin Jiao; FF, Fang Feng; XX, Xi Xin; CX, Chuan Xiong; DG, Dang Gui; SDH, Shu Di Huanga; BS, Bai Shao; RG, Rou Gui; FL, Fu Ling; DZ, Du Zhong; NX, Niu Xi; DS, Dang Shen; GC, Gan Cao.

Animals

Sprague Dawley rats aged 4 weeks (BW: 90–120g, n = 24) were purchased from Shanghai Slack Laboratory Animal Co. (Shanghai, China). Rats were raised in the SPF-class housing of laboratory at 60% humidity, 23°C room temperature and 12 h rhythm (8:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.) with food and water freely available. The animals were carefully treated according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Fujian University of TCM play a major role in approved and supervised the experimental (approval number: 2020015).

Preparation of Chondrocytes and LPS-Exposed Model

Chondrocytes were harvested and produced to an LPS-exposed cellular model as done in our previous studies (Liang et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020a; Li et al., 2020b). Briefly, chondrocytes were harvested from the knee joints of four Sprague Dawley rats at a time, six times in total. Cells were identified with collagen II antibody by immunohistochemistry. The cellular model was built by exposed Chondrocytes under10 ng/mL of LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) for 8 h.

Identification of the Key Pathway Concerning DHJSD in Treating OA by NPA

Predicting the Molecular Targets of OA

Genetic date on patients with OA acquisition from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.Gov/geo/). The series GSE46750 was an analysis of synovial cells from OA patients’ local tissue of inflammatory (I) or normal/reactive (N/R). Differential expression patterns were identified in two regions of the synovium in 12 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The series GSE82107 was an analysis of synovial biopsies that were obtained from the synovium of patients with OA to identify genes upregulated during OA. A total of 10 microarrays of end-stage OA synovial biopsies were compared with 7 microarrays of synovial biopsies obtained from individuals without a joint disease. The series GSE51588 was isolated from total RNA from the regions of interest from OA (n = 20) and non-OA (n = 5) patients, samples were got from knee lateral (LT) and medial tibial (MT) plateaus. This profile was obtained by performing whole-genome microarray profiling of the human osteoarthritic subchondral bone. The series GSE117999 was an analysis of cartilage tissues obtained from 12 OA patients 12 normal patients. The series GSE32317 characterised analyse the synovial membranes from early-stage or end-stage OA patients. A total of 10 samples of early-stage knee OA synovial membranes from the patients undergoing arthroscopic procedures for degenerative meniscal tears and 9 samples of end-stage knee OA synovial membranes. The series GSE29746 was used to identify difference expression gene between human synovial fibroblasts (SF) from OA synovial tissues and normal SF from healthy individuals (HSF). Synovial fibroblasts were obtained from 11 sex-matched and age-matched adult healthy donors (HSF) and 11 sex-matched and age-matched patients with OA (OASF). The raw file was processed by a robust multi-array average algorithm with normalisation of matrix data, and then filtered using the Limma package to analyse twice. The genes with p < 0.05 and |log 2 (fold change)| > 0.263 were screened as significantly differentially expressed genes. The analysis data obtained from the two series GSE46750 and GSE82107 were integrated as series 1, the analysis data obtained from the two series GSE51588 and GSE117999 were integrated as series 2 and the analysis data obtained from the two series GSE32317 and GSE29746 were integrated as series 3.

Construction of the Active Component-Target Network of DHJSD

The compound target network of DHJSD was constructed and visualised by the Cytoscape 3.7.2 software. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) data that contain many database including the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP™), Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets, Human Protein Reference Database, IntAct Molecular Interaction Database (IntAct), Molecular Interaction database (MINT) and the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. The Cytoscape3.7.2 software provides a visual for the PPI networks for DHJSD putative targets and OA-related targets.

Construction of PPI Networks and Screening of Key Targets

In this study, the Biogenet plugin was used to construct the PPI networks for DHJSD and OA targets, and Cytoscape was further to intersection of the two networks, screened the direct or indirect target regulatory network for DHJSD in OA treatment. Key genes were identified based on the network topology analysis plugin CytoNCA and filter out by degree centrality (DC), betweenness centrality (BC) and closeness centrality (CC) and explored for the core genes for DHJSD activity against OA.

Gene Ontology and KEGG Analysis

The Gene Ontology (GO) database (http://geneontology.org/) includes biological process (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC) data, and it was used to identify the biological mechanisms of a number of large genomes. The top 20 functional categories of each category were selected (FDR< 0.05). The KEGG database (https://www.kegg.jp/) was used to explore possible function and biological correlation with candidate target genes. The Cluster Profiler R package was used to visualise the result of GO and KEGG pathway enrichment. Pathways with an FDR of <0.05 were selected for the next step analysis. The gene pathway network analysis was used to determine significantly regulated pathways. To screen key target genes involved in DHJSD activity, we constructed the gene pathway network.

Component-Target Molecular Docking

The 3D structure of the key target genes was downloaded from the RSCB PDB database (https://www.rcsb.org/), the Auto Dock Tools 1.5.6 software was used to remove water and ligands and add hydrogen and stored as PDBQT file. The 2D structures of the top nine compounds of DHJSD were downloaded from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), processed, transformed into PDB format by Chem3D and stored as PDBQT file. The key target genes were provided as receptors, and the active compounds were provided as ligands. Finally, Autodock vina 1.1.2 was used to dock compounds with key target genes and protein.

Venn Analysis

The key target genes of intersections among series 1, series 2 and series 3 were screened by Venn analysis. The results of the key target genes of DHJSD, interactive PPI network topological analysis were submitted for Venn analysis. KEGG was performed to further analysis the genes dropped in the intersections of the target genes of DHJSD along with PPI network topological analysis. Finally, the key pathways concerning DHJSD in OA treatment were identified.

Verification of the Involvement of Targeted Pathways

Verification of the Efficacy of DHJSD on OA Related miRNA and Regulatory Pathway Prediction

Total RNA was extracted from chondrocytes using the TRIZOL reagent (Life, United States) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit). The mRNA expressions of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p were detected using the ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system. The primers used for amplification were as follows: miR-146a-5p (sequence UGA GAA CUG AAU UCC AUG GGU U, forward TGA GAA CTG AAT TCC ATG GGT T) and miR-34a-5p (sequence UGG CAG UGU CUU AGC UGG UUG U, forward TGG CAG TGT CTUT AGC TGG TTG T). The DIANA Tools (http://www.microrna.gr) was used to predict miRNA target mRNAs (Vlachos and Hatzigeorgiou, 2017), and we also analysed the miRNA target mRNA regulatory pathways.

Verification of the Efficacy of DHJSD by Western Blotting

It is found that the protein expression of MMP-9 in chondrocytes (LPS 10 ng/ml) was significantly reduced after culture under 300 μg/ml of DHJSD for 8 h in our previous research (Xu et al., 2019). Therefore, we selected 300 μg/ml of DHJSD and a duration of 8 h as the experimental conditions. According to NPA results, we also performed standard western blot analysis was used to confirm the involvement of the targeted pathway. We confirmed the involvement of the NF-κB signalling pathway and the toll-like receptor signalling pathway (Please refer to the Results and Discussion section). Chondrocytes were subjected to four treatment group, namely, control, model (LPS 10 ng/ml), DHJSD (DHJSD 300 μg/ml + LPS 10 ng/ml) and PDTC (an inhibitor of the NF-κB signalling pathway) (PDTC 10 µM + LPS 10 ng/ml) or TAK 242 (an inhibitor of the toll-like receptor four signalling pathway) (TAK 242 1 µM + LPS 10 ng/ml) for 8 h. Cell were lysed immediately in lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) for 30 min on ice, and total proteins were collected and quantified by the bicinchoninic acid assay. Protein sample (20 µg) was run on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and then transferred protein onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Sigma-Aldrich, United States). Then, 5% non-fat milk was used to block the membranes before incubation with primary antibodies against NF-κB p65 (ab16502, abcam, United States), IKK-β (ab124957, abcam, United States), TLR4 (ab22048, abcam, United States), MyD88 (ab 2064, abcam, United States), TRAF6 (ab40675, abcam, United States), IKK-α (ab32041, abcam, United States), IKB-α (ab32518, abcam, United States), p-IKB-α (ab2859, abcam, United States), ADAMTS-4 (ab185722, abcam, United States), ADAMTS-5 (ab41037, abcam, United States), MMP-3 (ab52915, abcam, United States), MMP-13 (ab39012, abcam, United States), MMP-14 (ab51074, abcam, United States), collagen Ⅱ (ab34712, abcam, United States) and β-actin (ab8226, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C overnight. Goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody IgG (bs-0295G-HRP, Bioss, China) or goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody IgG (bs-0296G-HRP, Bioss, China) was added to the membranes at 30°C column temperature. The enhanced chemiluminescence method was used to visualize the immunocomplexes. Protein bands were quantified by densitometry scanning (X-ray Spectroscopy System, cat. no. 170-8070; Bio-Rad). The Blots was analyzed using the Image Lab software, β-actin used as the control.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Assay

The mRNA expression levels of TLR4, TRAF-6, MyD88, NF-κB p65, IKK-α, IKK-β, MMP-3, MMP-13, MMP-14, IL-1β and TNF-α were detected by using the ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system. The primers used for amplification were as follows:TLR4 (forward 5′-CCG CTC TGG CAT CAT CTT CA-3′, reverse 5′-CTC CCA CTC GAG GTA GGT GT-3′); TRAF-6 (forward 5′-TGG TCA TTC ATA GCC CTG GAT-3′, reverse 5′-AGG ATC GTG AGG CGT ATT GTA-3′); MyD88 (forward 5′-CGG AGG AGA TGG GTT TCG AG-3′, reverse 5′-CCA GGC ATC CAA CAA ACT GC-3′); NF-κB p65 (forward 5′-AGA GAA GCA CAG ATA CCA CTA AGA-3′, reverse 5′-GTT CAG CCT CAT AGA AGC CAT C-3′); IKK-α (forward 5′-TGG AGT GAG AGG CTG TGA TAG-3′, reverse 5′-TTG AGT TGC TGT GAT GCT GAG-3′); IKK-β (forward 5′-CAT CAA GCA ATG CCG ACA GG-3′, reverse 5′-CAT TGG GTG CCA AGT TCT GC-3′); MMP-3 (forward 5′-ATG ATG ATG AAC GAT GGA CAG ATG-3′, reverse 5′-TGC TAC ACA TTG GTA AGG TCT CAG-3′); MMP-13 (forward 5′-GGA GTA ATC GCA TTG TGA GAG TC-3′, reverse 5′-GGT TCC AGC CAC GCA TAG TC-3′); MMP-14 (forward 5′-GCA CTT CGT GTT GCC TGA TGA C-3′, reverse 5′-GCC AGA ACC ATC GCT CCT TGA-3′); IL-1β (forward 5′-GCA CAG TTC CCC AAC TGG TA-3′, reverse 5′-AAG ACA CGG GTT CCA TGG TG-3′); TNF-α (forward 5′-ACT GAA CTT CGG GGT GAT CG-3′, reverse 5′-GCT TGG TGG TTT GCT ACG AC-3′). GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical data were analysed by SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data obtained from three independent experiments were analysed by two-way analysis of variance, through Bonferroni’s post-hoc correction for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

Results

Screening of the Key Pathway of DHJSD Using NPA

Compound Target Network Analysis

Differential analysis of the GEO database gene series GSE46750, GSE82107, GSE51588, GSE117999, GSE32317 and GSE29746 identified 538, 2,161, 4,531, 93, 433, and 2341 OA-related targets respectively. The heatmaps and volcano plot of OA-related targets are depicted in Figure 1A–1F and Supplementary Figure S1A–1F. A total of 2,638, 4,598 and 2715 OA-related targets were identified from series 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Altogether there were 85 OA-related targets at the intersection of series 1, 2 and 3 (Figure 1G).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Differentially expressed genes in series 1, series 2 and series 3. The heatmap of series 1 (GSE46750 and GSE82107) (A,B), series 2 (GSE51588 and GSE117999) (C,D), series 3 (GSE32317 and GSE29746) (E,F). (G) There are a total of 85 gene intersection in the three series, including PITPNC1, GYPC, AK5, DOK7, KLK3, DRG1, SIGLEC10, PHLDB1, ZCCHC5, TFPI, NUF2, LTC4S, CENPM, RBX1, DKC1, PRPS1, TMEM217, EXO1, ARHGAP11A, ELL2, FANCI, NAMPT, LPPR4, CDK2AP2, RARG, CERCAM, SPTAN1RAB20, MFNG, FKBP10, MARC1, TMEM35, MXD1, ISM1, BGN, SPATA18, FMNL3, LTBP3, CD300C, SPATA19, ABLIM3, RSPO2, STXBP2, CPLX1, ZBTB7B, BCL2L1, PNPLA2, SLC22A4, ANO3, SHROOM2, CRIP2, HPRT1, HBB, PRUNE2, SCRG1, WISP2, CCDC86, PDZRN4, HTR2A, RNF150, PCSK1, ZFP14, CCNB1, ANGPTL2, ZFAND5OGN, SLC11A1, KCNJ15, P2RY14, FABP4, SLC2A1, ALOX12, SF3A3, TCF7, TUSC3, C15orf26, SPATA17, LCAT, SLC16A6, SMOC2, LIMK2, CCDC136, PLA2G5, CKS2 and CCR5.

Using the screened compounds and their targets, the compound-target network for DHJSD was constructed (Figure 2). For series 1, the network consisted of 175 nodes (131 compounds for DHJSD and 44 compound targets) and 358 edges (Figure 2A). For series 2, the network consisted of 201 nodes (121 compounds for DHJSD and 80 compound targets) and 486 edges (Figure 2B). For series 3, the network consisted of 188 nodes (129 compounds for DHJSD and 59 compound targets) and 563 edges (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Compound-target network for DHJSD. The pink rectangle represents targets; the green rectangle, blue ellipse, blue hexagon, green parallelogram, cyan rectangle, cyan triangle, orange diamond, yellow triangle, red octagon, purple triangle and gray rectangle represent the compounds from BS, CX, DS, DH, DZ, FF, FL, GC, NX, XX and 22 multi-Drug.

Screening of Candidate Targets for DHJSD Against OA

To investigate the possible mechanisms that correlated with the effect of DHJSD on OA, the PPI networks of the OA-related targets and putative DHJSD targets were merged to identify a set of candidate targets. The first network of series 1 consisted of 2,785 nodes and 64,777 edges (Figure 3A), with a median of 27° among all nodes, and identified nodes with more than 61° as significant targets. A secondary network consisting of significant (DC > 61) targets from the first network, which contained 635 nodes and 24,605 edges (Figure 3B). The median values for BC and CC were 255.456929 and 0.567514, respectively. In order to construct the final network, additional screened to identify candidate targets, 163 targets with BC > 255.456929 and CC > 0.567514 were selected (Figure 3C). A total of 163 target genes were eventually identified for DHJSD activity against OA in series 1. The same process was used for series 2, and the network consisted of 3,652 nodes and 90,109 edges (Figure 3D), with a median of 29° among all nodes. The secondary network consisted of 898 nodes and 38,683 edges (Figure 3E). The median values for BC and CC were 360.002407 and 0.544242, respectively. In order to construct the final network, additional screened to identify candidate targets, 228 targets with BC > 360.002407 and CC > 0.544242 were selected (Figure 3F). Thus, 228 target genes were eventually identified for DHJSD activity against OA in series 2. For series 3, the network consisted of 2,462 nodes and 57,944 edges (Figure 3G) with a median 27° among all nodes. The secondary network contained 580 nodes and 23,359 edges (Figure 3H). The median values for BC and CC were 236.991554 and 0.556917, respectively. In order to construct the final network, additional screened to identify candidate targets, 150 targets with BC > 236.991554 and CC > 0.556917 were selected (Figure 3I). Finally, 150 target genes were eventually identified for DHJSD activity against OA in series 3.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

The candidate targets for DHJSD activity against OA. The interactive PPI network topology analysis of DHJSD putative targets and OA-related targets were constructed for series 1 (A, B, C), series 2 (D, E, F) and series 3 (G, H, I). DC, degree centrality; BC, betweenness centrality; CC, closeness centrality.

KEGG and GO Enrichment Analysis of Compound Target Genes

GO and KEGG pathway analysis was conducted to examine the 44 compound targets from series 1, 80 compound targets from series 2 and 59 compound targets from series 3. For series 1, 790 GO terms were significantly enriched (FDR <0.05) (734 BP categories, 14 CC categories and 42 MF categories). The highly enriched GO terms for BP, CC and MF included response to alcohol, response to antibiotic, cyclin-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme complex, mitochondrial outer membrane, NADP binding and histone kinase activity. For series 2, 695 GO terms were significantly enriched (FDR <0.05) (616 BP categories, 32 CC categories and 47 MF categories). The highly enriched GO terms for the BP, CC, and MF included cellular response to oxidative stress, response to oxidative stress, secretory granule lumen, cytoplasmic vesicle lumen, serine-type endopeptidase activity and serine-type peptidase activity. For series 3, 607 GO terms were significantly enriched (FDR <0.05) (551 BP categories, 19 CC categories and 37 MF categories). The highly enriched GO terms for the BP, CC, and MF included regulation of wound healing, regulation of response to wounding, apical part of cell, collagen-containing extracellular matrix, adrenergic receptor activity and histone kinase activity. The top 20 terms are depicted in Supplementary Figures S2–S4.

Figure 4 shows the pathways significantly correlation with DHJSD and OA, which were identified by the KEGG pathway analysis. For series 1, 93 considerably enriched pathways (FDR <0.05) were identified, which include the p53 signalling pathway, Pancreatic cancer, PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, IL-17 signalling pathway, Toll-like receptor signalling pathway, MAPK signalling pathway and TNF signalling pathway. For series 2, 88 significantly enriched pathways (FDR <0.05) were identified, which include the AGE-RAGE signalling pathway in diabetic complications, IL-17 signalling pathway, p53 signalling pathway, TNF signalling pathway, Toll-like receptor signalling pathway, PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, MAPK signalling pathway, NF-κB signalling pathway and Ras signalling pathway. For series 3, 21 significantly enriched pathways (FDR <0.05) were identified, which include the AGE-RAGE signalling pathway in diabetic complications, p53 signalling pathway, TNF signalling pathway and IL-17 signalling pathway. Series 1 and 2 contained 72 identical pathways, series 2 and 3 contained 14 identical pathways and series 1 and 3 consisted of 13 identical pathways.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4

Top 20 KEGG pathway enrichment candidate targets for DHJSD activity against OA for each expression profile. Pathways with significant changes (FDR <0.05) were identified. KEGG pathway labels the vertical axis, and number of differentially expressed genes marks the horizontal. The colour of the bar graph indicates the significance of the enriched KEGG pathway, and the colour gradient represents the size of the p-value. Inflammatory signalling pathways are underlined with a red bar. (A) series 1, (B) series 2 and (C) series 3.

Gene Pathway Network Analysis

The gene pathway network based on the significantly enriched pathways and genes were constructed (Figure 5). For series 1, based on the topological analysis and degree 20 pathways was performed. The network diagram showed that MAPK8, CCND1, RELA and CDKN1A had the highest degree, and selected as the core target gene. Moreover, BAD, STAT3, BCL2L1, CASP8 and CDK2 also exhibited a large degree (Figure 5A). For series 2, based on the topological analysis and degree 20 pathways was performed. The network diagram showed that MAPK1, MAPK14, MAPK10, CHUK had the highest degree, and selected as the core target gene. Moreover, STAT3, MMP9, MYC, CDK2, CYCS, CDK4 and E2F2 also exhibited a large degree (Figure 5B). For series 3, based on the topological analysis and degree 20 pathways was performed. The network diagram indicated that FOS had the highest degree, and selected as the core target gene. Moreover, ADCY2, MMP13, PRCKA, CCL2, MMP9, CCND1 and SERPINE1 also exhibited a high degree (Figure 5C).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5

Gene pathway network for DHJSD activity against OA. Top 20 pathways was performed with degree according to the topological analysis for series 1(A), series 2(B) and series 3(C).

The intersection of DHJSD and the three chip targets and the core targets obtained after the topological analysis of the three chips were selected for KEGG analysis. DHJSD was analysed for the union of the three chip targets and 77 KEGG pathways were detected. After the topological analysis of the three chips, 126 core targets were selected for KEGG analysis to obtain 41 KEGG pathways. The intersection of 77 and 41 pathways and 22 KEGG pathways are shown in Figure 6. Based on these results, the NF-κB signalling pathway and the toll-like receptor signalling pathway were chosen as the key pathways for further research.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6

Results of the KEGG enrichment analysis. (A) KEGG analysis of the union of the three series target genes of DHJSD, 77 KEGG pathways were significantly enriched. (B) KEGG analysis of the Venn of three series’ PPI network topology analysis action points. The result showed that there are a total of 126 genes and 41 KEGG pathways. Venn analysis showed that 22 KEGG pathways were identified after the intersection of A and B.

Molecular Docking Analysis

The results of molecular docking analysis to confirm the top nine compounds (quercetin, baicalein, beta-carotene, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, licochalcone a, luteolin, naringenin and wogonin) related to TLR4 showed that all compounds had strong binding affinity to TLR4, as shown in Table 2. The top three compounds strongly associated with TLR4 were beta-carotene, quercetin and luteolin (Figure 7). In addition, the top nine compounds also showed tightly bound to RELA (also known as NF-κB3), CHUK (also known as IKKα) (Supplementary Table S2, Figure S5, S6), RELA and CHUK were the core target genes obtained from the topological analysis. Verification of the involvement of targeted pathways in the therapeutic effects of DHJSD against OA.

TABLE 2

CompoundMolecular formulaCASdocking score (kcal/mol)
QuercetinC15H10O7117-39-5−8.1
BaicaleinC15H10O5491-67-8−7.5
Beta-caroteneC40H567,235-40-7−8.3
IsorhamnetinC16H12O7480-19-3−7.7
KaempferolC15H10O6520-18-3−7.6
Licochalcone aC21H22O458749-22-7−7.0
LuteolinC15H10O6491-70-3−8.0
NaringeninC15H12O5480-41-1−7.6
WogoninC16H12O5632-85-9−7.4

The binding free energy between the top nine compounds and TLR4.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7

The docking between the top nine compounds [quercetin (A), baicalein (B), beta-carotene (C), isorhamnetin (D), kaempferol (E), licochalcone a (F), luteolin (G), naringenin (H) and wogonin (I)]of Duhuo Jisheng Decoction (DHJSD) and Osteoarthritis target TLR4. The crystal structures of TLR4 was shown in blue and the compound was shown in purple.

DHJSD Inhibited the Expression of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p in LPS-Exposed Chondrocytes

LPS exposure increased the expressions of miR-146a-5p (Figure 8A) and miR-34a-5p (Figure 8B), whereas DHJSD downregulated these expressions in LPS-exposed chondrocytes. The miRNA-regulated gene-pathway analysis (Figure 8C) showed that the toll-like receptor signalling pathway (p = 0.012) and the NF-κB signalling pathway (p = 0.042) were significantly enriched, which was consistent with the NPA analysis.

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8

DHJSD suppresses the mRNA expression of miR-146a-5p (A) and miR-34a-5p (B). Chondrocytes were treated with or without LPS and DHJSD for 8 h. The expressions of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p were upregulated after LPS exposure and downregulated after DHJSD treatment. β-actin was selected as internal standards. miRNA-regulated gene-pathway analysis (C) found that the toll-like receptor signalling pathway and the NF-κB signalling pathway were significantly enriched. Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD), and SD is shown as vertical bars. ** indicates p < 0.01 and * indicates p < 0.05 compared with control or LPS-exposed chondrocytes.

DHJSD Suppressed the Expression of Inflammatory Proteins and Genes

The expression of collagen Ⅱ protein was upregulated by DHJSD or TAK-242. Chondrocytes were treated with or without LPS and DHJSD and TAK-242 in the presence of LPS for 8 h (Figure 9A). The protein expressions of ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5, MMP-3, MMP-13 and MMP-14 were downregulated by DHJSD or TAK-242 treatment (Figures 9B–F). The mRNA expressions of MMP-3, MMP-13, IL-1β and TNF-α upregulated after LPS treatment and downregulated after DHJSD or TAK-242 treatment (Figures 9I–K).

FIGURE 9

FIGURE 9

DHJSD suppresses the expression of inflammatory proteins and genes. Chondrocytes were cultivation with or without LPS and DHJSD or TAK-242 treatment in the presence of LPS for 8 h, and the associated protein level was conformed by western blot analysis (A). Protein levels of ADAMTS-4 (B), ADAMTS-5 (C), MMP-3 (D), MMP-13 (E), MMP-14 (F) and collagen-II (G). β-actin was used as the internal control for normalisation. MMP-3 (H), MMP-13 (I), IL-1β (J) and TNF-α (K) mRNA expressions were detected by RT-PCR. GAPDH was selected as internal standards. Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD), and SD is shown as vertical bars. N = 3. ★★Indicates p < 0.01 and indicates p < 0.05 compared with control or LPS-exposed chondrocytes. #Implies p > 0.05 compared with TAK-242.

DHJSD Effects Were Associated With the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Pathway

All the biomarkers of the LPS-exposed cells exhibited significant differences compared with intact cells. The protein expressions of NF-κB p65 and IKK-β were significantly upregulated after LPS exposure but significantly downregulated under DHJSD and PDTC treatment (Figures 10A–C). In the DHJSD and TAK-242 treatment groups, the protein expressions of TLR4, MyD88, TRAF-6, NF-κB p65, IKK-α, IKK-β and p-IκB-α were downregulated, and the mRNA expressions of TLR4, MyD88, TRAF-6, NF-κB p65, IKK-α and IKK-βwere downregulated (Figure11). In the DHJSD or PDTC treatment groups, the protein expressions of NF-κB p65 and IKK-β were downregulated, and the mRNA expressions of NF-κB p65 and IKK-β were downregulated (Figure 10). These changes have close correlation with changes in the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway mediated chondrocyte apoptosis, indicating that chondrocyte inflammation is a vital mechanisms of the effects of DHJSD.

FIGURE 10

FIGURE 10

DHJSD administration effects the NF-κB signalling pathway genes in LPS-exposed chondrocytes. The protein expression of NF-κB p65 and IKK-β after treatment with different concentrations of DHJSD for 8 h. Western blot analysis of protein expression levels (A); the protein expressions of NF-κB p65 (B) and IKK-β (C) were significantly upregulated after LPS exposure and downregulated after DHJSD or PDTC treatment. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and SD is shown as vertical bars. N = 3. Indicates p < 0.05, ★★Indicates p < 0.01, #implies p > 0.05 compared with PDTC.

FIGURE 11

FIGURE 11

DHJSD inhibits the TLR4 signalling pathway-induced apoptosis of LPS-exposed chondrocytes. Chondrocytes were cultivation with or without LPS and DHJSD or TAK -242 treatment in the presence of LPS for 8 h, and the associated protein level was tested by western blot (A). Protein levels of TLR4 (B), MyD88 (C), TRAF-6 (D), NF-κB p65 (E), IKK-α (F), KK-β (G) and p-IκB-α (H). β-actin was selected as internal standards. TLR4 (I), MyD88 (J), TRAF-6 (K), NF-κB p65 (L), IKK-α (M) and IKK-β (N) mRNA expressions were detected by qPCR. GAPDH was selected as internal standards. Values are means ± standard deviation (SD), and SD is shown as vertical bars. **indicates p < 0.01 and *indicates p < 0.05 compared with control or LPS-exposed chondrocytes. # implies p > 0.05 compared with TAK-242.

Discussion

In this research, we confirmed the utility of NPA for investigating the molecular targets of a complex herbal formulation using two sequential experiments. DHJSD is a typical widely-used complex herbal formulation with complicated ingredients (15 herbs), and research involving DHJSD is limited. We identified the quality control of DHJSD using conventional HPLC and identified 206 candidate compounds related to OA by TCM. In experiment 1, we constructed a standard NPA for DHJSD. The KEGG and GO enrichment analyses identified several inflammatory signalling pathways highly associated with DHJSD, and the results of Venn analysis between the target gene and PPI network topology analysis action point supported that the NF-κB signalling pathway and the toll-like signalling pathway play a key role in the effects of DHJSD, which were then subjected to experiment 2. We confirmed the involvement of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p, the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway and inflammatory-related genes by western blotting and qPCR. We found that DHJSD in fact contributed suppression of the expression of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p, the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway-related genes and inflammatory-related genes, which were upregulated upon LPS exposure. Hence, the role of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway was confirmed. In the present study we first performed conventional experiments combined with NPA and obtained an intact chain of evidence of DHJSD; thus, the value of NPA emerged.

Quality Control of DHJSD

Ligustrazine hydrochloride, paeoniflorin and osthole were chosen to be the quality control markers for DHJSD extract since it have been confirmed as quality control markers of CX, BS and DH, respectively, according to the pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (2015 version). The results of HPLC identified ligustrazine hydrochloride, paeoniflorin and osthole, confirming the three compounds as quality control markers for DHJSD extract. We identified 206 candidate compounds from the NPA analysis that may be associated with DHJSD activity against OA. Only paeoniflorin was one of these candidate compounds which may play a major role in the treatment of DHJSD against OA. The OB values of paeoniflorin was 53.87 and DL values was 0.79. Whereas the candidate compounds which excludes ligustrazine hydrochlorideand and osthole. The experimental result indicated that the pharmacological quality control markers from the pharmacopoeia may be a stable components of DHJSD but have some limitations, which were not present in the list of effective compound from NPA. Hence, in our next experiment the core bioactive compounds from NPA may considered as new candidate markers.

Bioactive Components and Molecular of DHJSD Construction by NPA Analysis

In this study, we first used three OA-related gene series for NPA. The compound-target networks of DHJSD were constructed using 131, 121 and 129 compounds and 44, 80 and 59 compound targets in the three series, respectively. Quercetin, luteolin, wogonin and baicalein acted on 23, 11, 9 and 8 targets in series 1; quercetin, luteolin, baicalein, and kaempferol acted on 41, 18, 13 and 12 targets in series 2; and quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol and wogonin acted on 36, 14, 12 and 10 targets in series 3, respectively. Therefore, quercetin, luteolin and kaempferol were probably the vital pleiotropically active compounds for DHJSD.

The candidate targets for DHJSD activity against OA were obtained by merging the three series PPI networks of DHJSD putative targets and OA-related targets. Furthermore, to achieve more accurate targets and structure a new network, we set 3, 6, 5 parameters, including DC and BC to further screen the nodes. Finally, 163, 228 and 150 targets were identified in series 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with 85 common action point targets.

To investigate the biological information of the targets of DHJSD activity against OA, we performed GO analysis. Results showed that DHJSD was involved in the regulation of some biological processes, indicating that the reduction of cartilage degeneration by DHJSD might related to the inflammatory response. The three series target genes related to the gene pathway network was constructed, and Venn analysis was performed to identify the intersections of the three OA-related pathway to identify key pathways for DHJSD activity against OA. The results of the gene pathway network analysis suggested that MAPK8, MAPK1 and FOS had the maximum degree, and it might be the core target in series 1, 2 and 3. The other top three genes were CCND1, RELA and CDKN1A in series 1; MAPK14, MAPK10 and CHUK in series 2; and ADCY2, MMP13 and PRCKA in series 3. In our previous study, the level of MMP-9 in LPS exposed chondrocytes was upregulated, and DHJSD reduced the MMP-9 level. MMP-9 was the key target genes in series 2 and series 3; furthermore the MMP family of genes, including MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3 and MMP-13, were also the key target genes of DHJSD in all the series. The MMP family participates in degradation of the extracellular matrix and basement membrane such as collagen Ⅱ and collagen Ⅳ, which leads to joint integrity and function (Lewis et al., 1997; Van Doren, 2015). Further verification is needed in future investigation.

Verification of the Key Role of the NF-κB Signalling Pathway of DHJSD in OA

Inflammation has an important and close relationship with the pathogenesis of OA (Shen et al., 2017). MMP-9 is one of the cartilage degradation biomarkers that is directly affected. Previous research has shown that the expression of MMP-9 is under the control of NF-κB signalling pathway (Alves et al., 2014; Nambi, 2021). In our experiments, the MMP-9 levels were significantly increased after LPS exposure, consistent with our previous study (Xu et al., 2021), but remarkably decreased after DHJSD treatment (Xu et al., 2019). NF-κB p65 and IKK-β expressions were significantly upregulated after LPS exposure and downregulated after DHJSD or PDTC treatment. IKK-β is a vital upstream activator that participates in the active and release cytosolic sequestration of NF-κB p65 subunits and nuclear repositioning (Durand and Baldwin, 2017; Jimi et al., 2019). The expression of these genes is altered after DHJSD or PDTC treatment, we hypothesised that the NF-κB signalling pathway plays a distinctive role in the effects of DHJSD on OA.

Verification of the Key Role of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signalling Pathway of DHJSD in OA

Regarding the involvement of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p in OA development, Shao et al. found that miR-146a-5p would activated NF-κB signalling pathway through TRAF6 which contribute to the chondrocyte apoptosis (Shao et al., 2020). MiR-34a-5p induced joint destruction and miR-34a-5p ASO injection protection cartilage damage (Endisha et al., 2021). Another recent study also showed that miRNA-regulated neuronal inflammation and apoptosis through NF-κB 1-induced LINC00665, and the inhibition of miR-34a-5p would restrain NF-κB-1 expression (Deng et al., 2021). In addition, the prediction target of miR-146a-5p showed that the NF-κB signalling pathway and the toll-like receptor signalling pathway were closely related pathways. Our experiment showed that after the LPS exposure of chondrocytes, the expressions of miR-146a-5p and miR-34a-5p increased in the OA cell model group. Moreover, the miRNA-regulated gene-pathway analysis revealed that the toll-like receptor signalling pathway and the NF-κB signalling pathway were significantly enriched, which was consistent with the NPA analysis.

The venn analysis between the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of target gene and PPI network topology analysis action point found 22 identical pathways, and the NF-κB signalling pathway and the toll-like receptor signalling pathway were in the lists of both analysis. The toll-like receptor (TLR) family has primary sensors that are essential for eliciting innate immune responses (Akira et al., 2006). The TLR signalling pathway controls the expression of inflammatory cytokine genes by the activation of NF-κB (Hayden et al., 2006). TLR4 recruits the MyD88 adaptor triggering the MyD88-dependent pathway, and the TLR4 MyD88 complex interacts with TRAF6. Next, IκB kinase is regulated by two kinases IKK-α and IKK-β, followed by phosphorylation and degradation, resulting in NF-κB p65 release from cytosolic sequestration and nuclear repositioning (Wang et al., 2015). Based on the above described results, we finally determined the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway for further verification in experiment 2, in which we observed the effects of LPS, DHJSD, PDTC and TAK-242 on the expression of proteins related to the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway. The expressions of NF-κB p65 and IKK-β were downregulated after DHJSD or PDTC treatment. The expressions of TLR4, MyD88, TRAF-6, NF-κB p65, IKK-α, IKK-β, P-IKB-α and IKB-α were affected by DHJSD and TAK-242 treatment, confirming the key role of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway in the effects of DHJSD treating OA.

Collagen Ⅱ was significantly downregulated after LPS exposure and increased with DHJSD or TAK-242 treatment, whereas the expressions of ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5, MMP-3, MMP-13 and MMP-14 showed opposite results. Collagen II plays a pivotal role in regulating cartilage matrix degeneration in OA progression (Hao et al., 2019), and the synthesis of collagen II would inhibited by MMPs including MMP-3 and MMP-13, while upregulated by IL-1β or other pro-inflammatory cytokines (Kapoor et al., 2011; Fei et al., 2019). MMP-3, MMP-13 and MMP-14 are crucial enzymes that directly degrade the extracellular matrix (Honsawek et al., 2013). ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5 were identified as the major cartilage aggrecanases in arthritis (Cooper et al., 2000). These proteins play vital role in cartilage matrix degeneration, confirming that DHJSD, PDTC or TAK-242 therapy would influence OA development. Furthermore, molecular docking showed that beta-carotene, quercetin and isorhamnetin had strong affinity for TLR4, implying that TLR4 plays an important role in the DHJSD treatment of OA. In addition the top nine compounds also showed strong affinity with TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB-related genes. As proved by the above-result, the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB-related genes, inflammatory gene transcription and various inflammatory factors function together to regulate the inflammatory reaction in the DHJSD treatment of OA.

Altogether, the results of NPA and conventional experiments suggested that the mechanisms of the action of DHJSD include comprehensive effects of several compounds and pathways, and the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway plays a key role. Suppression of the inflammatory response involved in the chondrocyte apoptosis, which may relevant to cartilage degeneration, is the key mechanism.

Conclusion

To explore the molecular targets of DHJSD in treating OA, we used NPA and designed two experiments, including the angles of compounds, genes and pathways. The results of this study suggest that NPA requires a powerful tool to investigate the molecular targets of the complex herbal formulations such as DHJSD and revealed the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signalling pathway as a key therapeutic target, although requiring and further investigation.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Fujian University of TCM (Approval number: 2020015).

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82074461), the Science and Technology Programs Pilot Project of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2021Y0032).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.784822/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AkiraS.UematsuS.TakeuchiO. (2006). Pathogen Recognition and Innate Immunity. Cell24124 (4), 783801. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015

  • 2

    AlvesA. C.AlbertiniR.dos SantosS. A.SantanaE.SerraA. J.SilvaJ. A.et al (2014). Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Metalloproteinase MMP-2 and MMP-9 Production and Percentage of Collagen Types I and III in a Papain Cartilage Injury Model. Lasers Med. Sci.29 (3), 911919. May. 10.1007/s10103-013-1427-x

  • 3

    CooperC.SnowS.McAlindonT. E.KellingrayS.StuartB.CoggonD.et al (2000). Risk Factors for the Incidence and Progression of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum.43 (5), 9951000. 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<995:AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-1

  • 4

    DengQ.MaL.ChenT.YangY.MaY.MaL. (2021). NF-κB 1-induced LINC00665 Regulates Inflammation and Apoptosis of Neurons Caused by Spinal Cord Injury by Targeting miR-34a-5p. Neurol. Res.43 (5), 418427. 10.1080/01616412.2020.1866373

  • 5

    DurandJ. K.BaldwinA. S. (2017). Targeting IKK and NF-Κb for Therapy. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol.107, 77115. 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2016.11.006

  • 6

    EndishaH.DattaP.SharmaA.NakamuraS.RossomachaE.YounanC.et al (2021). MicroRNA‐34a‐5p Promotes Joint Destruction during Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol.73 (3), 426439. 10.1002/art.41552

  • 7

    FeiJ.LiangB.JiangC.NiH.WangL. (2019). Luteolin Inhibits IL-1β-induced Inflammation in Rat Chondrocytes and Attenuates Osteoarthritis Progression in a Rat Model. Biomed. Pharmacother.109, 15861592. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.161

  • 8

    Funck-BrentanoT.NethanderM.Movérare-SkrticS.RichetteP.OhlssonC. (2019). Causal Factors for Knee, Hip, and Hand Osteoarthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study in the UK Biobank. Arthritis RheumatolOct71 (10), 16341641. 10.1002/art.40928

  • 9

    HaoH. Q.ZhangJ. F.HeQ. Q.WangZ. (2019). Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein, C-Terminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen, and Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 as Biomarkers for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis (OA) Diagnosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage27 (5), 726736. May. 10.1016/j.joca.2018.10.009

  • 10

    HaydenM. S.WestA. P.GhoshS. (2006). NF-kappaB and the Immune Response. Oncogene25 (51), 67586780. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209943

  • 11

    HonsawekS.MalilaS.YuktanandanaP.TanavaleeA.DeepaisarnsakulB.ParviziJ. (2013). Association of MMP-3 (-1612 5A/6A) Polymorphism with Knee Osteoarthritis in Thai Population. Rheumatol. Int.33 (2), 435439. 10.1007/s00296-012-2371-y

  • 12

    HuangZ.ShiX.LiX.ZhangL.WuP.MaoJ.et al (2020). Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Mechanism Governing the Effect of Simiao Powder on Knee Osteoarthritis. Biomed. Res. Int.2020, 6971503. 10.1155/2020/6971503

  • 13

    JianG. H.SuB. Z.ZhouW. J.XiongH. (2020). Application of Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking to Elucidate the Potential Mechanism of Eucommia Ulmoides-Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae against Osteoarthritis. BioData Min13, 12. 10.1186/s13040-020-00221-y

  • 14

    JimiE.TakakuraN.HiuraF.NakamuraI.Hirata-TsuchiyaS. (2019). The Role of NF-Κb in Physiological Bone Development and Inflammatory Bone Diseases: Is NF-Κb Inhibition "Killing Two Birds with One Stone". Cells8 (12), 8. Dec 14. 10.3390/cells8121636

  • 15

    KapoorM.Martel-PelletierJ.LajeunesseD.PelletierJ. P.FahmiH. (2011). Role of Proinflammatory Cytokines in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.7 (1), 3342. 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.196

  • 16

    KwonJ. Y.LeeS. H.NaH. S.JungK.ChoiJ.ChoK. H.et al (2018). Kartogenin Inhibits Pain Behavior, Chondrocyte Inflammation, and Attenuates Osteoarthritis Progression in Mice through Induction of IL-10. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 13832. Sep 14. 10.1038/s41598-018-32206-7

  • 17

    LaiX.WangX.HuY.SuS.LiW.LiS. (2020). Editorial: Network Pharmacology and Traditional Medicine. Front. Pharmacol.11, 1194. 10.3389/fphar.2020.01194

  • 18

    LatourteA.KloppenburgM.RichetteP. (2020). Emerging Pharmaceutical Therapies for Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.16 (12), 673688. 10.1038/s41584-020-00518-6

  • 19

    LewisE. J.BishopJ.BottomleyK. M.BradshawD.BrewsterM.BroadhurstM. J.et al (1997). Ro 32-3555, an Orally Active Collagenase Inhibitor, Prevents Cartilage Breakdown In Vitro and In Vivo. Br. J. Pharmacol.121 (3), 540546. Jun. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701150

  • 20

    LiL.LiuH.ShiW.LiuH.YangJ.XuD.et al (20172017). Insights into the Action Mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Osteoarthritis. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med.2017, 113. 10.1155/2017/5190986

  • 21

    LiX.ZhangZ.LiangW.ZengJ.ShaoX.XuL.et al (2020a). Data on Tougu Xiaotong Capsules May Inhibit P38 MAPK Pathway-Mediated Inflammation In Vitro. Data BriefFeb28, 105023. 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105023

  • 22

    LiX.ZhangZ.LiangW.ZengJ.ShaoX.XuL.et al (2020b). Tougu Xiaotong Capsules May Inhibit P38 MAPK Pathway-Mediated Inflammation: In Vivo and In Vitro Verification. J. Ethnopharmacol249, 112390. 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112390

  • 23

    LiangW.LiX.HuL.DingS.KangJ.ShenJ.et al (2019). An In Vitro Validation of the Therapeutic Effects of Tougu Xiaotong Capsule on Tunicamycin-Treated Chondrocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol229, 215221. 10.1016/j.jep.2018.10.022

  • 24

    LinP.WengX.LiuF.MaY.ChenH.ShaoX.et al (2015). Bushen Zhuangjin Decoction Inhibits TM-Induced Chondrocyte Apoptosis Mediated by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Int. J. Mol. Med.36 (6), 15191528. 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2387

  • 25

    LiuF.LiuG.LiangW.YeH.WengX.LinP.et al (2014). Duhuo Jisheng Decoction Treatment Inhibits the Sodium Nitroprussiate-induced A-poptosis of C-hondrocytes through the M-itochondrial-dependent S-ignaling P-athway. Int. J. Mol. Med.34 (6), 15731580. 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1962

  • 26

    LiuH.ZengL.YangK.ZhangG. (2016). A Network Pharmacology Approach to Explore the Pharmacological Mechanism of Xiaoyao Powder on Anovulatory Infertility. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med.2016, 2960372. 10.1155/2016/2960372

  • 27

    LiuW.JinS.HuangM.LiY.WangZ.WangP.et al (2020). Duhuo Jisheng Decoction Suppresses Matrix Degradation and Apoptosis in Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells and Ameliorates Disc Degeneration in a Rat Model. J. Ethnopharmacol250, 250112494. 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112494

  • 28

    LiuZ. C.WangZ. L.HuangC. Y.FuZ. J.LiuY.WeiZ. C.et al (2018). Duhuo Jisheng Decoction Inhibits SDF-1-Induced Inflammation and Matrix Degradation in Human Degenerative Nucleus Pulposus Cells In Vitro through the CXCR4/NF-Κb Pathway. Acta Pharmacol. Sin39 (6), 912922. 10.1038/aps.2018.36

  • 29

    NambiG. (2021). Does Low Level Laser Therapy Has Effects on Inflammatory Biomarkers IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and MMP-13 in Osteoarthritis of Rat Models-A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lasers Med. Sci.36 (3), 475484. Apr. 10.1007/s10103-020-03124-w

  • 30

    PeatG.ThomasM. J. (2021). Osteoarthritis Year in Review 2020: Epidemiology & Therapy. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage29 (2), 180189. 10.1016/j.joca.2020.10.007

  • 31

    ShaoJ.DingZ.PengJ.ZhouR.LiL.QianQ.et al (2020). MiR-146a-5p Promotes IL-1β-induced Chondrocyte Apoptosis through the TRAF6-Mediated NF-kB Pathway. Inflamm. Res.69 (6), 619630. Jun. 10.1007/s00011-020-01346-w

  • 32

    ShenJ.Abu-AmerY.O'KeefeR. J.McAlindenA. (2017). Inflammation and Epigenetic Regulation in Osteoarthritis. Connect. Tissue Res.58 (1), 4963. Jan;. 10.1080/03008207.2016.1208655

  • 33

    UK NCGC (2014). Osteoarthritis: Care and Management in Adults. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK)Feb.

  • 34

    Van DorenS. R. (2015). Matrix Metalloproteinase Interactions with Collagen and Elastin. Matrix Biol.44-46, 224231. May-Jul. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.005

  • 35

    VlachosI. S.HatzigeorgiouA. G. (2017). Functional Analysis of miRNAs Using the DIANA Tools Online Suite. Methods Mol. Biol.1517, 2550. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6563-2_2

  • 36

    WangP. F.XiongX. Y.ChenJ.WangY. C.DuanW.YangQ. W. (2015). Function and Mechanism of Toll-like Receptors in Cerebral Ischemic Tolerance: from Preconditioning to Treatment. J. Neuroinflammation12, 1280. Apr 28. 10.1186/s12974-015-0301-0

  • 37

    XuL.LiH.XuY.WangS.ZengJ.WangL.et al (2019). An Experimental Study of Mechanism of Action of Duhuo Jisheng Tang in Inhibiting Inflammatory Reaction Induced by Lipopolysaccharide in Chondroytes Based on NF-Κb Signalling Pathway. J. Traditional Chin. Orthopedics Traumatol.31 (07), 914+20.

  • 38

    XuY.LiH.HeX.HuangY.WangS.WangL.et al (2021). Identification of the Key Role of NF-Κb Signaling Pathway in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis with Bushen Zhuangjin Decoction, a Verification Based on Network Pharmacology Approach. Front. Pharmacol.12, 637273. 10.3389/fphar.2021.637273

  • 39

    YangM.JiangL.WangQ.ChenH.XuG. (2017). Traditional Chinese Medicine for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Overview of Systematic Review. PloS one12 (12), e0189884. 10.1371/journal.pone.0189884

  • 40

    ZengC.WeiJ.PerssonM. S. M.SarmanovaA.DohertyM.XieD.et al (2018). Relative Efficacy and Safety of Topical Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Br. J. Sports Med.52 (10), 642650. May. 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098043

  • 41

    ZhangL.ShiX.HuangZ.MaoJ.MeiW.DingL.et al (2020). Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Mechanism Governing the Effect of Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae on Osteoarthritis. BMC Complement. Med. Ther.20 (1), 121. Apr 21. 10.1186/s12906-020-02909-4

  • 42

    ZhangW.WangS.ZhangR.ZhangY.LiX.LinY.et al (2016). Evidence of Chinese Herbal Medicine Duhuo Jisheng Decoction for Knee Osteoarthritis: a Systematic Review of Randomised Clinical Trials. BMJ open6 (1), e008973. Jan 4. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008973

  • 43

    ZhangZ.HuangC.JiangQ.ZhengY.LiuY.LiuS.et al (2020). Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis in China (2019 Edition). Ann. Transl Med.8 (19), 1213. Oct;. 10.21037/atm-20-4665

  • 44

    ZhuN.HouJ.MaG.LiuJ. (2019). Network Pharmacology Identifies the Mechanisms of Action of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Med. Sci. Monit.25, 60516073. Aug 14. 10.12659/msm.915821

Summary

Keywords

network pharmacology approach, complex herbal formulations, molecular targets, osteoarthritis, Duhuo Jisheng decoction, inflammatory

Citation

Liu L, Xu L, Wang S, Wang L, Wang X, Xu H, Li X and Ye H (2022) Confirmation of inhibitingTLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signalling Pathway by Duhuo Jisheng Decoction on Osteoarthritis: A Network Pharmacology Approach-Integrated Experimental Study. Front. Pharmacol. 12:784822. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.784822

Received

28 September 2021

Accepted

28 December 2021

Published

24 January 2022

Volume

12 - 2021

Edited by

Yuanjia Hu, University of Macau, China

Reviewed by

Wei Dong Chen, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, China

Bendong Fu, Jilin University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xihai Li,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics