SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol., 30 July 2025

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1600460

The pharmacology and mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went: a scoping review

  • 1. Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

  • 2. Haihe Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

  • 3. KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Article metrics

View details

2

Citations

2,2k

Views

1,6k

Downloads

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study is to review the recent studies on the pharmacology and mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went, analyze its medicinal value, and explore future research directions.

Method:

A scoping review was conducted by searching the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, VIP database, SinoMed, and PubMed from inception until September 2024. The basic information of the included studies, such as study types, disease types, main components, outcomes, and efficacy, was reviewed and summarized. Methodological quality was assessed using the SYRCLE’s risk of bias assessment tool for animal studies and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for clinical trials.

Results:

We identified 251 studies from the five databases. Among them, 153 were experimental studies, 70 were reviews, and 28 were clinical trials. Of the experimental studies, molecular studies accounted for the largest portion, totaling 80 (52%). Among the reviews, research progress accounted for the most, totaling 41 (59%). The clinical trials studied the effects of Monascus purpureus Went and its related Chinese patent medicines and preparations. Of these, 17 (61%) used Monascus purpureus Went-related Chinese patent medicines and preparations as interventions and 11 (39%) used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulations of Monascus purpureus Went as interventions. In terms of methodological quality, both animal studies and clinical trials related to Monascus purpureus Went showed deficiencies in randomized allocation sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding methods.

Conclusion:

We summarized existing studies on the active ingredients and effects of Monascus purpureus Went and found that it is necessary to improve the generation of random allocation sequences and the application of the blinding method in Monascus purpureus Went-related animal studies and clinical trials. When similar studies are conducted in the future, the specific methods of random assignment should be more clearly described, and blinding methods should be applied to improve the objectivity and accuracy of the studies, thereby providing a reference for selecting future research directions and establishing supporting evidence.

1 Introduction

Monascus purpureus Went is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with a long history, produced through the fermentation of ordinary rice using Monascus species (Chen et al., 2000). It is mainly produced in Fujian, Zhejiang, and Jiangxi. Additionally, Monascus purpureus Went is sweet in taste, warm in nature, and belongs to the liver, spleen, stomach, and large intestine meridians, according to TCM theory. It is recorded in the Supplement to Augmented Materia Medica that Monascus purpureus Went has the effects of “promoting blood circulation and helping digestion, strengthening the spleen and warming the stomach, treating dysentery, and bringing down water.” Clinically, Monascus purpureus Went is mainly used to treat postpartum lochia, abdominal pain with stagnation, food accumulation and fullness, dysentery, and bruises (Song et al., 1999a).

In 2024, Japan’s Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. experienced a safety incident involving “health products containing Monascus purpureus Went ingredients.” After investigation, the issue was potentially caused by contamination of the Monascus purpureus Went fermentation raw materials with penicillic acid or by inadequate cleanliness in the production environment, lead to the presence of penicillium mixed. This incident once again brought the efficacy and safety of red yeast into the global social hot spot (Ma 2025; Sun, 2025; Zhu et al., 2025).

Modern pharmacology has discovered that Monascus purpureus Went has lipid-lowering, anti-tumor, antioxidant, anti-osteoporosis, antibacterial, and other effects (Wei et al., 2023). In addition, Monascus purpureus Went has a wide range of applications in brewing, fermented foods, food coloring, and other fields. In recent years, new application fields have been gradually developed, such as animal husbandry and veterinary medicine, feed fermentation, healthy fermented foods, healthy drinks, and healthy seasonings (Xie, 1996). In recent years, the extraction of the lipid-lowering component lovastatin from Monascus purpureus Went (Endo, 1980) has further enhanced the research value of Monascus purpureus Went, attracting great attention from scholars both at home and abroad. The significant lipid-lowering effect and medicinal potential of lovastatin have inspired many scholars to conduct studies on the pharmacology and mechanism of action of this new component in Monascus purpureus Went, resulting in many remarkable findings, such as studying the lipid-lowering mechanism and content determination method of lovastatin (Wen et al., 2001), optimizing the extraction process of lovastatin from Monascus purpureus Went (Wang et al., 2024a), and producing drugs mainly composed of lovastatin, such as Xuezhikang (Kong et al., 2005). At present, the pharmacological research on Monascus purpureus Went still needs to be improved to further understand and develop its medicinal value and expand its application range.

A large number of studies on Monascus purpureus Went have been published, including reviews (Wang et al., 2024b). However, these published reviews lacked a comprehensive literature search, which led to limited references and unreliable evidence evaluation. Such limitations may introduce certain biases into the review, which is not conducive to the reference of other studies. In contrast, this study conducts a scoping review based on evidence-based medicine methods to systematically summarize the recent studies on the pharmacology and mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went, analyze its medicinal value, and explore future research directions.

2 Data and methods

2.1 Search strategy

Five databases, namely, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, VIP database, SinoMed, and PubMed, were searched from inception to September 2024. The search terms consisted of Monascus purpureus Went, Monascus, Monascus purpureus Went, pharmacology, pharmacological effect, pharmacological mechanism, biological activity, and active ingredient. The full search terms of all databases are shown in Supplementary Add S1.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Studies focused on Monascus purpureus Went; study types were not limited, and the language was English or Chinese.

Exclusion criteria: Manuscripts with unavailable full text and duplicate publications were excluded. News reports, conference papers, or dissertations were also excluded.

2.3 Study screening and data extraction

The screening and extraction process was as follows: 1) NoteExpress software was used to exclude duplicate studies, 2) two reviewers performed an initial screening after reading the titles and abstracts based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3) the full text was reviewed when additional information was needed for screening, and 4) any disagreements were resolved through discussion with a third researcher.

The basic information in the included studies, such as title, authors, year of publication, type of study, subject of study, study population, study method, intervention, duration of treatment, dosage, control measure, measurement index, method of measurement, result, and conclusion, was extracted.

2.4 Data analysis

We analyzed all extracted data fields, including bibliometric statistics, visual data analysis, and evidence graph analysis. We also systematically organized and comprehensively summarized study evidence information.

2.5 Quality assessment

Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, including animal studies and clinical trials, as this is an integral part of evidence-based research. The SYRCLE’s risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the quality of animal studies, and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The evaluation results were indicated as “low risk,” “high risk,” or “unclear risk.”

3 Results

3.1 Search results

A total of 2,494 studies were initially searched. Among them, 970 were duplicates, and 1,223 were excluded after reading the title or abstract. Among 301 studies assessed in full text, 50 were excluded for the following reasons: not focusing on Monascus purpureus Went (n = 41) and lack of full text (n = 9). Finally, 251 studies were included in the final review.

The study screening process is presented in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

3.2 Characteristics of included studies

A total of 251 literature studies were included, comprising 242 Chinese publications (96%) and 9 English publications (4%). There were 153 experimental studies (61%), 70 reviews (28%), and 28 clinical trials (11%). The included studies were published between 1988 and 2024, with the highest number published in 2007 (n = 18). The number of studies published each year is presented in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2

We summarized and generalized evidence from studies on Monascus purpureus Went, including its definition, origin, fermentation strain, morphological features, production process, acquisition methods, ingredients, identification methods, clinical efficacy, safety evaluation, and applications. The chart of evidence from studies on Monascus purpureus Went is presented in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3

Among the experimental studies, molecular studies accounted for most of them, totaling 80 (52%). Among the reviews, research progress accounted for most of the studies, totaling 41 (59%). Clinical trials studied the effects of Monascus purpureus Went and its related Chinese patent medicine in the treatment of diseases, with 17 (61%) using Monascus purpureus Went-related Chinese patent medicines and preparations as interventions and 11 (39%) using TCM formulations of Monascus purpureus Went as interventions. The details of the research topics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1

StudyTypeStudy topic
Experimental studiesMolecular study (Wu and Luo, 2013)Content determination (Luo et al., 2010)
Chemical property (Wang et al., 2000)
Monascus purpureus Went identification method (Yan, 1999)
Component extraction process (Endo, 1980)
Strain identification and screening (Zhu et al., 2025)
Animal study (Huang et al., 2019)Lipid lowering (Lu et al., 2006)
Effect on bones (Wang et al., 2024b)
Improvement of fatty liver (Zhu et al., 2025)
Lowering blood pressure (Sun, 2025)
Anti-inflammatory effect (Ma, 2025)
Safety evaluation (Ma, 2025)
Tumor inhibition (Song et al., 1999a)
Cerebrovascular disease (Chen et al., 2000)
Regulation of gastrointestinal diseases (Chen et al., 2000)
Kidney disease (Chen et al., 2000)
Cell study (Yu et al., 2000)Identification and screening of bacterial strains (Xie, 1996)
Efficacy (Wei et al., 2023)
Physiological morphology of bacterial strains (Song et al., 1999a)
ReviewsResearch progress (Luo and Zhang, 2011)Pharmacological mechanisms (He, 2004)
Active ingredients (Wang et al., 2024b)
Clinical efficacy (Wen et al., 2001)
Classification criteria (Chen et al., 2000)
Popular science (Chen et al., 2005)Pharmacological mechanisms (Wang et al., 2024a)
Monascus purpureus Went-related food and drug use (Wei et al., 2023)
Origin (Sun, 2025)
Safety evaluation (Song et al., 1999a)
Other (Zhu et al.)Production (Song et al., 1999a)
Industry standard (Song et al., 1999a)
Selective breeding (Chen et al., 2000)
Meta-analysis/SR (Song et al., 1999a)Clinical efficacy (Chen et al., 2000)
Safety evaluation (Chen et al., 2000)
Clinical trialsRandomized controlled trial (Chen et al., 2005)TCM Monascus purpureus Went (Xie, 1996)
Xuezhikang capsule (Wei et al., 2023)
Shengqu Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Song et al., 1999a)
Lipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went micro-powder (Song et al., 1999a)
Zhibituo capsule (Chen et al., 2000)
Compound Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Chen et al., 2000)
Monascus purpureus Went flavonoid tablet (Chen et al., 2000)
Rattan Monascus purpureus Went soft capsule (Chen et al., 2000)
Coptis chinensis Franch.Monascus purpureus Went medicine (Chen et al., 2000)
Controlled trial (Wei et al., 2023)TCM Monascus purpureus Went (Song et al., 1999a)
Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation (Chen et al., 2000)
Zhibituo capsule (Chen et al., 2000)
Monascus purpureus Went capsule for reducing sugar (Chen et al., 2000)
Danxi Monascus purpureus Went wine (Chen et al., 2000)

Study topics.

3.3 Experimental study

3.3.1 Molecular study

Eighty molecular studies related to Monascus purpureus Went were included.

3.3.1.1 Content determination

Forty studies determined the content of active ingredients in Monascus purpureus Went, with lovastatin and citrinin (orange mold) being the most common ingredients. The methods for content determination included high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (n = 29), thin-layer chromatography scan (TLCS) (n = 2), capillary electrophoresis (CE) (n = 2), automatic amino acid analyzer (AA) (n = 2), gas chromatography (GC) (n = 1), quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe–ultra-performance liquid chromatography–multiple reaction monitoring–ion-dependent acquisition–criteria-enhanced product ion (QuEChERS-UPLC-MRM-IDA-Criteria-EPI) (n = 1), phenol–sulfuric acid (PSA) (n = 1), anthrone–sulfuric acid (ASA) (n = 1), dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) (n = 1), flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) (n = 1), and statistical analyses including statistical package for the social sciences principal component analysis and cluster analysis (SPSS PCA and SPSS CA) (n = 1).

3.3.1.2 Chemical property

Fourteen studies examined the chemical properties of the active ingredients in Monascus purpureus Went, including antioxidant activity (n = 5), chemical structure (n = 5), lipid-lowering activity (n = 2), poisoning mechanism (n = 1), and protease and amylase activities (n = 1).

3.3.1.3 Monascus purpureus Went identification method

Thirteen studies examined the methods for identifying different Monascus purpureus Went strains using chromatography (n = 6), spectroscopy (n = 4), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (n = 2), and secondary metabolite fingerprint (SMF) (n = 1).

3.3.1.4 Component extraction process

Eight studies investigated the extraction process of active ingredients in

Monascus purpureus

Went.

  • (1) Lovastatin: One study used 88% ethanol in an amount 13 times that of the raw material, with reflux extraction for 1.3 hours (n = 1); another study used six times the amount of 95% ethanol, with reflux extraction performed twice, each for 0.5 hours (n = 1); and a third study used 250 mL of ethanol, with reflux for 5 hours (n = 1).

  • (2) Monacolin K: One study used 70% ethanol (pH 7.5) with a material-to-solvent ratio of 1:30, an extraction time of 1.5 hours, and an extraction temperature of 50°C (n = 1); another study used pure methanol with an extraction temperature 60°C, a liquid-to-solid ratio of 20:1, and ultrasonic extraction for 1 hour (n = 1); and a third used 65% ethanol with a material-to-liquid ratio of 1:20, an extraction temperature of 70°C, and an extraction time of 3 hours (n = 1).

  • (3) Total flavonoid: One study used analytically pure ethanol and ultrasonic (50 kHz, 250 W) extraction for 20 min, followed by adsorption using 1 g of polyamide powder. The sample was then transferred to a chromatography column (inner diameter 1.0 cm) and eluted with methanol elution (0.5 mL/min) (n = 1).

  • (4) Monascus purpureus Went pigment: One study used a 70% ethanol aqueous solution with an extraction temperature of 60°C and an extraction time of 2 hours (n = 1).

3.3.1.5 Strain identification and screening

Five studies examined the identification and screening of Monascus purpureus Went strains based on molecular biology.

3.3.2 Animal study

Among the 58 animal studies, 54 used rat models (93%), 3 used rabbit models, and 1 used the quail model. A total of 55 studies determined the efficacy of Monascus purpureus Went, including double-armed studies (n = 6), three-armed studies (n = 10), and multi-armed studies (n = 39). Three studies determined the safety of erythromycin, including a two-armed study (n = 1), a three-armed study (n = 1), and a multi-armed study (n = 1). Fifty-four studies contained a blank control, and four studies did not contain a blank control.

Among them, 26 studies showed that Monascus purpureus Went had lipid lowering effects, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 5), Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation (n = 3), vinegar bean lipid-lowering capsule (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went earthworm (Pheretima) protein tablet (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went Allium sativum L. fermentation extract (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went Poria cocos (Schw.) Wolf tablet (n = 1), compounded Monascus purpureus Went capsule (n = 1), a mixture of Monascus purpureus Went and grape seed anthocyanidin (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went bee glue tablet (n = 1), Xuezhikang capsule (n = 1), lovastatin (n = 1), natto (Glycine max) Monascus purpureus Went (n = 1), Ginkgo biloba L. Monascus purpureus Went vitamin grouping (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went combined with Fang Feng Tong Sheng powder (n = 1), Fagopyrum esculentum Moench Monascus purpureus Went powder (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went–phytosterol ester compound preparation (n = 1), Yunnan Monascus purpureus Went powder (n = 1), compounded Monascus purpureus Went extract (n = 1), yellow Monascus pigment (n = 1), and sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Monascus purpureus Went capsule (n = 1). Twelve studies showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on repairing bones, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 11) and Monascus purpureus Went capsule-containing coenzyme Q10 (n = 1); five studies showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on improving fatty liver, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 3), Monascus purpureus Went Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge (n = 1), and Coptis chinensis Franch. Monascus purpureus Went medicine (n = 1); four studies showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on lowering blood pressure, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 4); three studies showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on anti-inflammation, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 3); three studies showed a good safety profile of Monascus purpureus Went, involving Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went extract (n = 1), and Panax Notoginseng (Burk.) F.H.Chen Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation (n = 1); two studies showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on tumor inhibition, involving Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide (n = 2); one study showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on cerebrovascular disease, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 1); one study showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on regulating the gastrointestinal tract, involving TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 1); and one study showed that Monascus purpureus Went had an effect on treating renal disease, involving Monascus purpureus Went extract (n = 1).

Among these studies, the most commonly used dose was 0.625 g/mL of aqueous Monascus purpureus Went solution, administered via irrigation at 10 mL/kg, and the most commonly used course of treatment was 28 days. The specific information on animal studies is presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Inclusion of studiesDiseaseModelMethod of administrationInterventionDosageCourse of treatmentOutcome indicator
Yan (1999)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationDistilled water vs. vinegar lipid-lowering capsule low dose (Chinese patent medicine) vs. vinegar lipid-lowering capsule medium dose (Chinese patent medicine) vs. vinegar lipid-lowering capsule high dose (Chinese patent medicine)0.3 g/kg.bw, 0.6 g/kg.bw, and 1.2 g/kg.bw28 days①②③
Wang et al. (2000)NephrosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. blank control0.8 g·kg−1·day−120 days①②③④⑥⑦
Yu et al. (2000)HyperlipemiaRabbitIrrigationYunnan Monascus purpureus Went powder low dose (traditional TCM preparation) vs. Yunnan Monascus purpureus Went powder medium dose (traditional TCM preparation) vs. Yunnan Monascus purpureus Went powder high dose (traditional TCM preparation) vs. lovastatin4 mg·kg−1·day−1, 6 mg·kg−1·day−1, 10 mg·kg−1·day−1, and 6 mg·kg−1·day−142 days①②③④⑥⑦
Sun et al. (2001a)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. blank control0.6 g/kg BW and 1.2 g/kg BW28 days①②③
Sun et al. (2001b)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. blank control0.4 g/kg BW, 0.8 g/kg BW, and 1.2 g/kg BW21 days
Wang et al. (2002)Fatty liverQuailIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. Dongbao liver-healthy vs. lovastatin vs. blank control0.8 g·kg−1, 1.6 g·kg−1, and 0.6 g·kg−120 days①②③④
He (2004)Hyperlipemia and atherosclerotic lesionsRabbitIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went Allium sativum L. fermentation extract vs. blank control100 g/day126 days①②③④
Lu et al. (2004)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. α-D3 vs. blank control10 mL/kg98 days⑨⑩⑪⑰
Tang et al. (2004)HypertensionRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. blank control0.417 g/(kg·day)21 days⑫⑬
Chen et al. (2005)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationLovastatin low dose vs. lovastatin medium dose vs. lovastatin high dose vs. Gynostemma Blume5, 15, and 30 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg42 days④⑭
Lu et al. (2005a)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. α-D3 vs. blank control10 mL/kg90 days⑮⑯
Lu et al. (2005b)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. α -D3 vs. blank control10 mL/kg84 days⑪⑰
Wang et al. (2005)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationCompound Monascus purpureus Went capsule high dose vs. compound Monascus purpureus Went capsule medium dose vs. compound Monascus purpureus Went capsule high dose vs. blank control167, 333, and 1,000 mg/kg28 days①②③
Lu et al. (2006)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. Pravastatin vs. Premarin vs. blank control10 mL/kg10 days⑯⑱
Wang et al. (2006a)Air pouch synovitisRatIrrigationIbuprofen vs. lovastatin high dose vs. lovastatin low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. blank control30 mg/kg, 3.6 mg/kg, 1.8 kg/mg, 200 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 50 mg/kg5 days⑲⑳㉑
Wang et al. (2006b)Small ear swellingRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. lovastatin high dose vs. lovastatin low dose vs. blank control300 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg, 75 mg/kg, 5.2 mg/kg, 2.6 mg/kg5 days
Wu et al. (2006)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. Pravastatin vs. Premarin vs. blank control10 mL/kg10 days
Ding (2007)TumorRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went polysaccharide low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide high dose vs. blank control100, 400, and 800 mg/kg14 days㉓㉔
Lei et al. (2007)HypertensionRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. positive vs. blank control0.83 g/kg, 0.42 g/kg, and 10 mg/kg28 days⑫⑬㉕㉖
Wang et al. (2007)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went compound preparation high dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation high dose vs. blank control0.47 g/kg, 0.23 g/kg, and 0.12 g/kg30 days①②③
Wu et al. (2007a)FractureRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. bone-knitting tablet vs. blank control10 mL/kg42 days⑮㉗
Wu et al. (2007b)FractureRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. blank control10 mL/kg42 days
Zheng et al. (2007)HypertensionRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. captopril vs. indapamide vs. blank control0.25 g/BW/day, 0.42 g/BW/day, 0.84 g/BW/day, 10 mg/BW/day, and 0.21 mg/BW/day28 days⑧⑫⑬㉕㉖
Jiang et al. (2008)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMixture of Monascus purpureus Went and grape seed anthocyanidin low dose vs. mixture of Monascus purpureus Went and grape seed anthocyanidin medium dose vs. mixture of Monascus purpureus Went and grape seed anthocyanidin high dose vs. blank control12 mg/mL, 120 mg/mL, and 360 mg/mL70 days①②③⑤
Lu et al. (2008)osteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. pravastatin vs. Premarin vs. blank control10 mL/kg10 days⑯⑱㉙
Wang et al. (2008)ArthritisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. indomethacin vs. blank control500 mg·kg−1 and 5 mg·kg−134 days㉚㉛㉜
Chen et al. (2010)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationCompounded Monascus purpureus Went extract low dose vs. compounded Monascus purpureus Went extract medium dose vs. compounded Monascus purpureus Went extract high dose vs. lovastatin vs. blank control0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 g·kg−1 and 0.24 g·kg−121 days①②③④
Luo et al. (2010)Non-alcoholic fatty liverRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. Gynostemma Blume vs. blank control1 g/(kg · day), 0.33 g/(kg · day), and 0.17 g/(kg · day)56 days㉟㊱㊲
Luo and Zhang (2011)Non-alcoholic fatty liverRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. Gynostemma Blume vs. blank control1 g/(kg · day), 0.33 g/(kg · day), and 0.17 g/(kg · day)56 days①②④㉝㉞
Zhao and Liu (2011)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went–phytosterol ester compound preparation low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went–phytosterol ester compound preparation medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went–phytosterol ester compound preparation high dose vs. Xuezhikang capsules vs. blank control0.167, 0.333, and 1.0 g/kg45 days①②③④
Zhou et al. (2011)TumorRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went polysaccharide low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide high dose vs. Tremella polysaccharide vs. blank control200, 100, and 50 mg/(kg · day) and 50 mg/(kg · day)14 days㉓㉔㊳
Ou-yang et al. (2012)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationFagopyrum esculentum Moench Monascus purpureus Went powder high dose vs. Fagopyrum esculentum Moench Monascus purpureus Went powder medium dose vs. Fagopyrum esculentum Moench Monascus purpureus Went powder small dose vs. Xuezhikang capsule vs. blank control1,200, 600, and 300 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg14 days①②③④
Zhai et al. (2012)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went compound preparation low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation high dose vs. Xuezhikang capsule vs. blank control0.21 g·kg-1BW, 0.42 g·kg-1BW, 1.25 g·kg-1BW, –0.2 g·kg-1BW30 days①②③④
Du and Chen (2013)Safety evaluationRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. blank control15 g/kg14 days
Liu et al. (2013)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationCompounded Monascus purpureus Went capsule low dose vs. compounded Monascus purpureus Went capsule medium dose vs. compounded Monascus purpureus Went capsule high dose vs. blank control167, 333, and 1,000 mg/kg30 days①②③
Lin et al. (2014)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. blank control10 mL/kg28 days①②③④㊵㊶
Su et al. (2014)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationXuezhikang capsule vs. blank control500 mg·kg−1·day−114 days
Zhou (2014)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. blank control0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g/kg28 days①②③④
Gao et al. (2015)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went combined with Fang Feng Tong Sheng powder (Chinese patent medicine) vs. Fang Feng Tong Sheng powder vs. blank control1 mL/time and 2 times/day30 days①②③④
Qian et al. (2015)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. fluvastatin vs. blank control(0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 g/mL) 10 mL/kg and (0.1 g/L) 10 mL/kg35 days
Lu et al. (2016)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went capsule-containing coenzyme Q10 vs. diethylstilbestrol vs. blank control0.5 tablet ·kg−1 and 30 μg·kg−160 days⑰㊹
Lu et al. (2017)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. estrogen vs. blank control10 mL/kg84 days⑰㉙㉛
Pang et al. (2017)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationNatto (Glycine max) Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. natto (Glycine max) Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. natto (Glycine max) Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. blank control0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 g/kg BW30 days①②③④
Zhang et al. (2017)Safety evaluationRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went polysaccharide low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide high dose vs. blank control100 mg/(kg · day) and 300 mg/(kg · day)21 days㉔㉝㉞㉟㊴
Shen et al. (2018)OsteoporosisRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. estrogen vs. blank control10 mL/kg56 days⑪㊺
Zhou et al. (2018)HyperlipemiarabbitIrrigationSea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Monascus purpureus Went capsule high dose vs. sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Monascus purpureus Went capsule low dose vs. simvastatin vs. blank control3.6 g/kg, 1.8 g/kg, and 0.005 g/kg15 days①②③④
Huang et al. (2019)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went bee glue tablet low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went bee glue tablet medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went bee glue tablet high dose vs. blank control0.17, 0.33, and 1.00 g/kg42 days①②④
Liu et al. (2019)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationYellow Monascus pigment low dose vs. yellow Monascus pigment medium dose vs. yellow Monascus pigment high dose vs. SIM vs. blank control50, 100, and 200 mg/(kg · day) and 15 mg/(kg · day)28 days①②㉝㉞
Luo et al. (2019)Syndrome of food retention due to spleen deficiencyRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went unleavened vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went fermented vs. domperidone vs. blank control1.17 g·kg-1·day-1, 1.17 g·kg-1·day-1, and 3.9 mg·kg-1·day-110 days
Wang (2019)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. blank control5 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, and 90 mg/kg31 days①②
Liu et al. (2020)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went Poria cocos (Schw.) Wolf tablet low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went Poria cocos (Schw.) Wolf tablet medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went Poria cocos (Schw.) Wolf tablet high dose vs. Xuezhikang capsule vs. blank control0.79 g/kg, 1.58 g/kg, 4.75 g/kg, and 0.2 g/kg28 days①②③④㊻
Liu et al. (2021)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationGinkgo biloba L. Monascus purpureus Went vitamin grouping (low dose) vs. Ginkgo biloba L. Monascus purpureus Went vitamin grouping (high dose) vs. positive25 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg32 days①②④
Sun et al. (2022)Cerebral small vessel diseaseRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. nimodipine vs. blank control0.75 g·kg-1, 1.5 g·kg−1, 3 g·kg-1, and 20 mg·kg−130 days
Ma et al. (2022)Safety evaluationRatIrrigationPanax Notoginseng (Burk.) F.H.Chen and Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation high dose vs. Panax Notoginseng (Burk.) F.H.Chen and Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation medium dose vs. Panax Notoginseng (Burk.) F.H.Chen and Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation low dose vs. blank control2, 4, and 8 g·(kg·day)−1 and 40 mg/kg14 days
Zheng et al. (2022)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationTCM Monascus purpureus Went low dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went medium dose vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went high dose vs. lovastatin vs. blank control0.09 mg/kg, 0.16 mg/kg, 0.21 mg/kg, and 0.21 mg/kg42 days①②③④㉝㉞
Ding and Ren (2023)HyperlipemiaRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went earthworm (Pheretima) protein tablet low dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went earthworm (Pheretima) protein tablet medium dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went earthworm (Pheretima) protein tablet high dose vs. Simvastatin vs. blank control0.167 g/kg, 0.333 g/kg, 0.666 g/kg, and 0.01 g/kg/d28 days①②③④
Yu et al. (2023)Non alcoholic steatohepatitisRatIrrigationMonascus purpureus Went–Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge high dose vs. Monascus purpureus Went–Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge low dose vs. PPC vs. blank control1.323 g·(kg·day)-1, 2.646 g·(kg·day)-1, and 0.086 g·(kg·day)-124 days①②④㉛㉝㉞
Zhang et al. (2023)Non-alcoholic fatty liverRatIrrigationCoptis chinensis Franch. Monascus purpureus Went medicine high dose vs. Coptis chinensis Franch. Monascus purpureus Went medicine low dose vs. obeticholic acid vs. blank control2.1 g/kg, 1.1 g/kg, and 0.5 mg/kg28 days①②④⑤㉝㉞㉟㊲

Information on animal studies related to Monascus purpureus Went.

Note: ①, total cholesterol (TC) level; ②, triglyceride (TG) level; ③, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level; ④, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level; ⑤, plasma oxygen-free radical (SOD, MDA, and GSH Px) level; ⑥, ApoA level; ⑦, ApoB level; ⑧, systolic blood pressure (SBP); ⑨, bone gla protein (BGP) level; ⑩, calcitonin (CT) level; ⑪, bone density; ⑫, endothelin (ET) level; ⑬, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) level; ⑭, atherosclerotic index (AI); ⑮, BMP-2 level; ⑯, osteoblast number; ⑰, bone biomechanical properties; ⑱, number of mineralized nodules; ⑲,white blood cell (WBC) count; ⑳, C-reactive protein (CRP) level; ㉑, malondialdehyde (MDA) level; ㉒, degree of swelling; ㉓, tumor suppression Rate; ㉔, organ index; ㉕, lung tissue ACE level; ㉖, aortic NOS level; ㉗, Nilsson’s histologic score; ㉘, bone tissue morphometric parameters; ㉙, ALP level; ㉚, arthritis index (AI) and pathology score; ㉛, serum TNF-α levels; ㉜, synovial MCP-1 and RANTES levels; ㉝, ALT levels; ㉞, AST levels; ㉟, blood glucose levels; ㊱, GIR levels; ㊲, insulin levels; ㊳, relative growth rate; ㊴, body weight and liver weight; ㊵, serum adiponectin levels; ㊶, AdipoR1/AdipoR2 mRNA expression levels; ㊷, EPC proliferation, adhesion, migration, and in vitro angiogenesis ability; ㊸, BMP-4 mRNA and protein expression levels in bone scab tissues; ㊹, bone calcium, bone phosphorus, and hydroxyproline content; ㊺, bone tissue RANKL, OPG protein, and mRNA expression levels; ㊻, serum levels of motilin (MTL), gastrin (GAS), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP); ㊼, PI3K/AKT/mTOR protein expression levels; ㊽, cell micro-nucleus breakage, deletion, reciprocal translocation, circular chromosome, monovalent body, and cell aberration rate.

All 58 animal studies were randomized controlled studies. Among them, 55 studies only reported “randomization,” and 3 used the random number table method. A total of 58 studies reported that the experimental group was consistent with the control group at baseline. Fifty-seven studies did not report allocation concealment and blinding, and only one blinded the investigator and the animal keeper. Forty-two studies did not report whether the environments in which the animals were placed were randomized or not, and 16 studies reported that the animals were grown in the same environments; no missing data appeared. The risk of bias assessment of animal studies is presented in Table 3.

TABLE 3

Included in the study
Yan (1999)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wang et al. (2000)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Yu et al. (2000)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Sun et al. (2001a)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Sun et al. (2001b)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wang et al. (2002)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
He (2004)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Lu et al. (2004)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Tang et al. (2004)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Chen et al. (2005)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lu et al. (2005a)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lu et al. (2005b)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wang et al. (2005)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Lu et al. (2006)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wang et al. (2006a)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wang et al. (2006b)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wu et al. (2006)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Ding (2007)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lei et al. (2007)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wang et al. (2007)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wu et al. (2007a)Low risk (random digital table method)Low riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wu et al. (2007b)Low risk (random digital table method)Low riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zheng et al. (2007)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Jiang et al. (2008)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Lu et al. (2008)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Wang et al. (2008)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Chen et al. (2010)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Luo et al. (2010)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Luo and Zhang (2011)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Zhao and Liu (2011)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Zhou et al. (2011)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Ou-yang et al. (2012)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Zhai et al. (2012)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Du and Chen (2013)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Liu et al. (2013)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lin et al. (2014)Low risk (random digital table method)Low riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Su et al. (2014)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zhou (2014)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Gao et al. (2015)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Qian et al. (2015)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lu et al. (2016)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lu et al. (2017)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Pang et al. (2017)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Zhang et al. (2017)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Shen et al. (2018)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zhou et al. (2018)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Huang et al. (2019)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Liu et al. (2019)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Luo et al. (2019)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wang (2019)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Liu et al. (2020)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Liu et al. (2021)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Sun et al. (2022)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Ma et al. (2022)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Zheng et al. (2022)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Ding and Ren (2023)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskUnclear
Yu et al. (2023)UnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zhang et al. (2023)UnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskUnclearUnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk

Risk of bias assessment of animal studies.

Note: ① whether the generation or application of the allocation sequence is sufficient; ② whether the baselines are the same; ③ whether allocation concealment is sufficient; ④ whether the animals were randomly placed during the study; ⑤ whether researchers and animal breeders were blinded; ⑥ whether random selection was conducted during result evaluation; ⑦ whether to use blinding methods for the evaluators of the results; ⑧ whether incomplete data were reported; ⑨ whether the research report is not related to selective reporting of results; ⑩ whether there is no other bias present.

3.3.3 Cell study

Fifteen cellular studies related to Monascus purpureus Went were included. Seven studies focused on the identification and screening of Monascus purpureus Went bacterial strains using cell biology techniques. Six studies determined the efficacy of Monascus purpureus Went, including the synthesis and in vitro anticancer activity of Monascus purpureus Went derivatives (n = 1), the blood pressure-lowering mechanism of Monascus purpureus Went (n = 1), the effect of Monascus purpureus Went on the secretion of TNF-alpha by peripheral blood single-nucleated cells of ankylosing spondylitis patients (n = 1), the effect of erythrocytes on the cell growth and molecular mechanisms of HCT-116 cells (n = 1), the effect of Monascus purpureus Went on the proliferation of myocardial fibroblasts (n = 1), and the role of Monascus purpureus Went in inducing apoptosis and autophagy in human colon cancer cells (n = 1).

Two studies examined the physiological characteristics of Monascus purpureus Went and Monascus purpureus Went (n = 1) and the morphological characteristics of TCM Monascus purpureus Went (n = 1).

3.4 Clinical trial

A total of 28 clinical trials studied the effects of TCM Monascus purpureus Went and its related Chinese patent medicine and preparation, including double-armed trials (n = 18), single-armed trials (n = 6), three-armed trials (n = 3), and multiple-armed trials (n = 1). One study was set up with a blank control, and four were set up with a placebo. The mode of administration was oral. Patient sources included tertiary hospitals (n = 19), secondary hospitals (n = 7), and other sources (n = 2). Diseases included dyslipidemia (n = 22), carotid atherosclerotic plaque (n = 3), unstable angina (n = 2), abnormal liver function (n = 2), hyperglycemia (n = 1), type 2 diabetes (n = 1), uremia (n = 1), and fatty liver (n = 1).

Among them, 19 studies examined the effects of Chinese patent medicines and preparations related to Monascus purpureus Went, including Xuezhikang capsule (n = 6), Zhibituo capsule (n = 2), Shengqu Monascus purpureus Went capsule (n = 2), lipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went micro-powder (n = 2), Monascus purpureus Went compound preparation (n = 1), compound Monascus purpureus Went capsule (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went capsule for reducing sugar (n = 1), Monascus purpureus Went flavonoid tablet (n = 1), rattan Monascus purpureus Went soft capsule (n = 1), Danxi Monascus purpureus Went wine (n = 1), and C. chinensis Franch. Monascus purpureus Went medicine (n = 1); nine studies determined the clinical therapeutic effect of TCM Monascus purpureus Went.

Among them, the most commonly used dose of TCM Monascus purpureus Went was 6 g/dose, administered once daily, with a treatment course of 90 days; the most commonly used dose of Xuezhikang capsule was 2 capsules/dose, administered twice daily, and the course of treatment was 56 days; the most commonly used dose of Zhibituo capsule was 1.05 g/dose, administered thrice daily, with a treatment course of 60 or 90 days; the most commonly used dose of Shengqu Monascus purpureus Went capsule was 2 capsules/dose or 4 capsules/dose, and the course of treatment was 84 or 168 days; and the most commonly used dose of lipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went micro-powder was 1 capsule/dose, administered thrice daily, with a treatment course of 50 or 180 days.

In terms of indicator domains, physical and chemical testing indicators were applied 28 times, symptom and sign indicators were applied 13 times, and TCM symptom/syndrome indicators were applied six times.

For counting indicators, clinical efficacy was applied 14 times, and TCM evidence efficacy was applied four times. Measurement indicators included lipid levels (n = 25), liver and kidney functions (n = 6), blood routine (n = 2), TCM evidence points (n = 2), blood glucose levels (n = 2), body mass index (n = 2), serum inflammatory factor (n = 2), electrocardiography (n = 1), SGA scores (n = 1), and carotid ultrasound (n = 1). The specific information on clinical trials is presented in Table 4.

TABLE 4

Inclusion of studiesDiseaseSource of subjects (hospital level)Enrollment timeNumber of menNumber of womenTotal quantityAge-bracketAverage ageMethod of administrationInterventionFrequencyCourse of treatmentIndicator domainCounting indicatorMeasuring indicator
Cui et al. (2002)HyperlipemiaIIIAugust 2000–December 2000523890Did not report59Profess to be convincedCompound Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs Western medicine2 grains/time, 3 times/day; 1 grain/time, 1 time/day30 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥
Yin et al. (2016)Primary dyslipidemiaIIIDecember 2013–December 201522118140Did not report58.73 ± 10.20Profess to be convincedMonascus purpureus Went compound preparation (Chinese medicine preparation)1 time/day30 daysTCM symptoms/syndromes; physical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥⑦
Zhang and He (2016)HyperlipemiaIIIAugust 2014–January 2016404080Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedWestern medicine vs TCM Monascus purpureus Went + Western medicine1.5 g/time, 3 times/day; 5 mg/time, 2 times/day90 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥
Chen et al. (2021)Hyperlipemia was associated with abnormal liver functionIIIJuly 2018–December 2019432910225–7553.48 ± 10.30Profess to be convincedBasic treatment + TCM Monascus purpureus Went1 time/day56 daysTCM symptoms/syndromes; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥⑦⑧⑨
Luo and Zhong (2020)DyslipidemiaIIJuly–December 201928326045–75Did not reportProfess to be convincedWestern medicine vs TCM Monascus purpureus Went1 time/day; 2 times/day90 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥⑩
Zhang et al. (2020)HyperlipemiaSecondary hospitalMay 2016–May 2018253661Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedTCM Monascus purpureus Went6 g/day56 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥
Zhao et al. (2018)Hyperlipemia was associated with abnormal liver functionIIIJune 2017–March 201850308025–75Did not reportProfess to be convincedBasic treatment + TCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. basic treatment6 g/day90 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥⑧⑨
Wang and Li (2018)HyperlipemiaIIIMarch 2017–September 2017503484Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedWestern medicine vs. TCM Monascus purpureus Went10 mg/time, 3 time/day; 3/day90 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③⑤⑥
Shi et al. (2015)DyslipidemiaIIIDid not report2532880–9285.6 ± 4.8Profess to be convincedTCM Monascus purpureus Went6 g/time, 2 times/day56 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥⑪⑫
Wang et al. (2022)Uremia and hyperlipemiaIIISeptember 2021–June 202231376862–8668.13 ± 12.53Profess to be convincedBasic treatment + Western medicine vs. basic treatment + TCM Monascus purpureus Went10 mg/day, 1 time/day; 6 g/day56 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥⑬⑭⑮⑯
Wu and Luo (2013)Carotid atherosclerotic plaqueIIIJanuary 2011–December 2012Did not reportDid not report60Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedTCM Monascus purpureus Went vs. Western medicine vs. blank control6 g/time, 2 times/day; 1 time/day180 daysTCM symptoms/syndromes; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥⑰⑱⑲
Liu et al. (1998)HyperlipemiaIIIJuly 1995–July 1996413576Did not report61.2 ± 3.6Profess to be convincedZhibituo capsule (Chinese patent medicine)3 times/day60 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③⑥
Qiu et al. (1997)HyperlipemiaIIIAugust 1995–February 199611264176Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedDi’ao Zhibituo capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. Western medicine3 times/day90 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③⑤⑥
Lu et al. (2012)HyperlipemiaIIIMay 2010–October 201128326018–75Did not reportProfess to be convincedBasic treatment + Xuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. basic treatment + placebo2 times/day56 daysTCM symptoms/syndromes; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥
Wang et al. (1995)HyperlipemiaIIIDid not report261185446Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedXuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. placebo2 times/day56 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥
Zhu (2013)Unstable anginaSecondary hospitalJune 2009–November 201255258066–89Did not reportProfess to be convincedBasic treatment + Xuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. basic treatment2 grains/time, 2 times/day60 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing
Tang and Chang (2012)HyperlipemiaSecondary hospital2009–201162289038–6548Profess to be convincedBasic treatment + Xuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. basic treatment2 times/day28 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥
Huang and Zhang (2005)Unstable anginaSecondary hospitalDid not report611879Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedBasic treatment + Xuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. basic treatment2 times/day3 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report⑮⑱⑲
Zheng and Li (2015)HyperlipemiaIIIJuly 2013–July 201423194239–70Did not reportProfess to be convincedXuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. Western medicine0.5 g/time, 2 times/day; 1 grain/time, 1 time/day50 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥
Wang et al. (2016)Carotid atherosclerotic plaqueIIIJanuary–December 2015586212055–7361.4 ± 7.7Profess to be convincedShengqu Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. Western medicine4 grains/time, 3 times/day; 20 mg/day168 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥
Wang et al. (2014)DyslipidemiaIII2012–2013388212035–7351.4 ± 7.7Profess to be convincedShengqu Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. Shengqu Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. Western medicine2 grains/time, 3 times/day; 10 mg/day84 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥
Xu et al. (2019)HyperlipemiaIIDid not report4371114Did not report44.59 ± 12.32Profess to be convincedSea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Monascus purpureus Went capsule (Chinese patent medicine) vs. placebo2 grains/time, 1 time/day90 daysSymptoms and signs; TCM symptoms/syndromes; physical and chemical testing①②③④⑤⑥
Cao et al. (2007)Type 2 diabetesIIISeptember 2006–July 200714163028–7055.2Profess to be convincedMonascus purpureus Went capsule for reducing sugar (Chinese patent medicine)3 grains/time, 1 time/day90 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing
Chen and Liu (2015)Dyslipidemia and hyperglycemiaIIMarch 2013–December 2014Did not reportDid not report70Did not report50.50 ± 4.20Profess to be convincedDanxi Monascus purpureus Went wine (Traditional Chinese medicine preparation)50 mL, 150 mL, and 250 mL/time; 2 times/day90 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥⑩⑬
Liu et al. (2011)Dyslipidemia was associated with carotid atherosclerotic plaqueOther sourcesApril 2005–April 2006233760Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedLipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went micro powder (Chinese patent medicine 1) vs. Xuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine 2) vs. Western medicine1 grain/time, 2 times/day; 2 grains/time, 2 times/day; 1 tablet/time, 1 time/day180 daysTCM symptoms/syndromes; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥⑰
Wu et al. (2005)HyperlipemiaOther sourcesDid not reportDid not reportDid not report80Did not reportDid not reportProfess to be convincedHalf dose of lipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went micro powder (Chinese patent medicine 1) vs. lipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went micro powder (Chinese patent medicine 2) vs. lipid-lowering Monascus purpureus Went crude powder (Chinese patent medicine 3) vs. Xuezhikang capsule (Chinese patent medicine 4)1 grain/time, 2 times/day; 0.6 g/time, 2 times/day50 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③④⑤⑥⑪⑫
Yang et al. (2024)Intervention in non-alcoholic fatty liverIIIOctober 2020–October 202141398032–6044.52 ± 6.2Profess to be convincedWestern medicine vs. Coptis chinensis Franch. Monascus purpureus Went medicine (Chinese medicine preparation) + Western medicine3 times/day; 1 time/day56 daysPhysical and chemical testingDid not report③④⑤⑥⑧⑨
He et al. (2007)HyperlipemiaIIIDid not report692110018–6544.06 ± 9.17Profess to be convincedMonascus purpureus Went Flavonoid tablet (Chinese patent medicine) vs. placebo2.4 g/day30 daysSymptoms and signs; physical and chemical testing③⑤⑥

Information on clinical trials related to Monascus purpureus Went.

Note: ①, clinical efficacy; ②, efficacy of TCM syndrome; ③, total cholesterol (TC) level; ④, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level; ⑤, triglyceride (TG) level; ⑥, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level; ⑦, TCM syndrome points; ⑧, ALT horizontal; ⑨, AST horizontal; ⑩, blood glucose check; ⑪, ApoB level; ⑫, ApoA level; ⑬, body mass index (BMI); ⑭, serum albumin (ALB); ⑮, C-reactive protein (CRP) level; ⑯, SGA grade; ⑰, carotid artery ultrasound; ⑱, routine blood test; ⑲, liver and kidney function; ⑳, electrocardiogram.

A total of 21 studies were randomized controlled trials (79%), and six were self-controlled trials (21%). Among the 22 randomized controlled trials, only 15 reported “randomization”; six used a randomized numeric table method, and one used lottery method. Only one study performed allocation concealment, four studies blinded patients, and one study blinded outcome assessors. The remaining studies did not perform allocation concealment or apply blinding; no missing data were reported. Thirteen studies exhibited other sources of bias, such as not reporting the source of funding or trial enrollment, while nine studies provided complete reporting. The risk of bias assessment of clinical trials is presented in Table 5.

TABLE 5

Included in the studyGeneration of the randomly assigned sequencesAllocation concealmentSubjects were blindedBlinded to the outcome assessorsResulting data integritySelective reportOther bias
Cui et al. (2002)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zhang and He (2016)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Luo and Zhong (2020)Low risk (random digital table method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Zhao et al. (2018)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wang and Li (2018)Low risk (random digital table method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Wang et al. (2022)Low risk (lottery method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Wu and Luo (2013)Low risk (random digital table method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Liu et al. (1998)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Qiu et al. (1997)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Lu et al. (2012)UnclearUnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wang et al. (1995)UnclearUnclearLow riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zhu (2013)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Huang and Zhang (2005)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Zheng and Li (2015)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Wang et al. (2016)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Wang et al. (2014)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Xu et al. (2019)UnclearLow riskLow riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Chen and Liu (2015)Low risk (random digital table method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskHigh risk
Liu et al. (2011)Low risk (random digital table method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Wu et al. (2005)UnclearUnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
Yang et al. (2024)Low risk (random digital table method)UnclearHigh riskUnclearLow riskLow riskLow risk
He et al. (2007)UnclearUnclearLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskHigh risk

Risk of bias assessment of RCTs.

4 Discussion and analysis

4.1 Content determination method of active ingredients in Monascus purpureus Went

4.1.1 High-performance liquid chromatography

HPLC is the most commonly used method to determine the content of active ingredients in Monascus purpureus Went, particularly lovastatin and citrinin (orange mold) (Wang and Gao, 2006; Wen et al., 2011; Hao et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2015; Qiu et al., 2012; Luo et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 1997; Liu, 2007; Fan, 2013; Zhang et al., 2001; Chen and Zhao, 2007; Zhu et al., 2023; Huang, 2000; Chen et al., 2008; Wang, 2014; Gao et al., 2022; Li et al., 2011; Wang, 2000; Song et al., 1999b; Xie et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2020; Li and Li, 2008; Lv et al., 2020; Li et al., 2010; Li et al., 2019; Qi et al., 2021), and is characterized by simplicity, accuracy, reliability, good repeatability, and high sensitivity.

4.1.2 Thin-layer chromatography scan

TLCS is a method used to determine the content of phosphatidylcholine and daidzein in Monascus purpureus Went and Xuezhikang capsule (Xu et al., 2000; Xu et al., 2001), which is characterized by simplicity and good repeatability and can be used to control the quality of Monascus purpureus Went and its preparations.

4.1.3 Capillary electrophoresis

CE is a method used to determine the contents of lovastatin and citrinin (a compound produced by orange mold) in Monascus purpureus Went (Chen et al., 2007a; Zhang et al., 2008), which is characterized by simplicity, speed, high sensitivity, and good repeatability in detecting certain charged components.

4.1.4 Other methods

AA is a method used to determine the content of amino acids in Monascus purpureus Went (Chen et al., 2007b), which is characterized by high sensitivity and accuracy. GC is a method used to determine the contents of oleic acid and linoleic acid in Monascus purpureus Went (Zhang et al., 2010). QuEChERS-UPLC-MRM-IDA Criteria-EPI is a method used to determine and quantify the content of lovastatin (Wang, 2016). PSA, ASA, and DNS are methods used to determine the content of polysaccharides in Monascus purpureus Went (Fang et al., 2021). FAAS is a method used to determine the content of metal trace elements in Monascus purpureus Went (Lin et al., 2001). SPSS PCA and SPSS CA were used to analyze trace elements in Monascus purpureus Went (Cao and Wu, 2009) to reveal the relationships and distribution patterns between components.

4.2 Chemical ingredients of Monascus purpureus Went

A variety of active ingredients in Monascus purpureus Went provide the material basis for the pharmacological effect of Monascus purpureus Went, mainly including Monascus pigment, monacolin K, ergosterol, stigmasterol, Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide, and a variety of enzymes.

4.2.1 Monascus pigment

Monascus pigment is a secondary metabolite of Monascus purpureus Went. Monascus pigment not only provides a unique color for Monascus purpureus Went but also possesses physiological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties. So far, as many as 54 types of Monascus pigment have been identified, among which the more intensively studied pigments include yellow Monascus pigment, ankaflavin, rubropunctamine, and monascorubramine. It has been demonstrated that yellow Monascus pigment has a protective effect on the liver of hyperlipemia mice and can regulate blood lipids, and the mechanism of action may be related to the regulation of lipid metabolism and activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway to stimulate fatty acid oxidation (Fang et al., 2021). Monascorubramine can promote the apoptosis of gastric cancer AGS cells, while no obvious inhibitory effect on normal cells was observed, and its therapeutic coefficient is higher than that of paclitaxel, which is a conventional chemotherapeutic drug for gastric cancer (Lin et al., 2001). The safety of Monascus pigment has been proven to be high through acute and chronic toxicity studies, and it has been widely used as an additive ingredient of Monascus pigment in food and cosmetic production processes (Jiang et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2018; Pan et al., 2023).

4.2.2 Statin ingredients

The statin component of Monascus purpureus Went has a wide range of applications in the field of medicine. In the late 1970s, Japanese scientists discovered and isolated a chemical component called monacolin K from the fermentation of Monascus purpureus Went, which can inhibit cholesterol synthesis in the body (Kong et al., 2005). Further studies revealed that the statin component in Monascus purpureus Went is similar to chemically synthesized statins in terms of its lipid-lowering effect. Among them, lovastatin, the most common statin component in Monascus purpureus Went, was formally approved by the FDA in the United States in 1987 and became the first generation of statin lipid-lowering drugs. In addition, lovastatin has an anti-tumor effect, which can induce the activation of the key molecule of apoptosis, caspase 7, and its receptor PARP protein cleavage. Lovastatin can inhibit the proliferation of PC3 cells and induce apoptosis in prostate cancer and has been shown to be efficacious in common tumors, such as gastric cancer, carcinoma of the bile duct, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (Xu et al., 2018).

4.2.3 Sterol composition

Monascus purpureus Went produces a variety of sterol components during the fermentation process, such as ergosterol and stigmasterol. Ergosterol is one of the precursor substances of vitamin D2, which can be converted into vitamin D2 after ultraviolet irradiation, and is involved in the metabolism of calcium and phosphorus in the body, which has an obvious effect on the prevention and treatment of rickets in infants and young children and the promotion of calcium and phosphorus absorption in pregnant women and the elderly. Studies have shown that ergosterol can significantly reduce the blood glucose level of diabetic nephropathy model mice, providing a theoretical basis for ergosterol to be used in the clinical treatment of diabetic nephropathy (Xu et al., 2018). Soysterol can competitively inhibit the absorption of cholesterol in the human body and effectively reduce the level of serum cholesterol, which is an important active ingredient in regulating lipid balance and preventing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Ge et al., 2012).

4.2.4 Other ingredients

Monascus purpureus Went contains a variety of other active ingredients, such as Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharide, unsaturated fatty acids, a variety of enzymes (e.g., amylase, protease, and lipase), and flavonoids, which also play important roles in the pharmacological effects of Monascus purpureus Went.

For example, Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharides exhibit various physiological activities, such as immunoregulatory, anti-tumor, and lipid-lowering effects; unsaturated fatty acids help lower blood lipids and prevent cardiovascular diseases; and a variety of enzymes promote digestion and absorption of food in the human body.

4.3 Pharmacological mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went

4.3.1 Lipid-lowering ability

Monascus purpureus Went has a lipid-lowering effect. This is mainly attributed to the enrichment of statins in Monascus purpureus Went, such as monacolin K, which is the active ingredient of lovastatin. A number of included clinical trials have shown (Yin et al., 2016; Zhang and He, 2016; Chen et al., 2021; Luo and Zhong, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2016) that Monascus purpureus Went has a lipid-lowering effect, generally reducing plasma total cholesterol (TC) levels, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, and triglyceride (TG) levels and also increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels.

4.3.2 Oxidation resistance

Antioxidant components such as polyphenolic compounds and flavonoids in Monascus purpureus Went can scavenge free radicals in the body and reduce cellular damage caused by oxidative stress. Studies have shown that the extracellular polysaccharides of Monascus purpureus Went have the ability to scavenge DPPH-free radicals, confirming the antioxidant effect of Monascus purpureus Went (Cai et al., 2010). This antioxidant effect helps slow down the cellular aging process and protects the cardiovascular system, the liver, and other organs from oxidative damage. In addition, the antioxidant effect of Monascus purpureus Went is complemented by its lipid-lowering effect, which works together to maintain the healthy state of the human body. Included clinical trials have shown that Monascus purpureus Went can reduce ALT and AST levels in patients with hyperlipemia and liver function abnormalities, thus protecting the liver.

4.3.3 Anti-inflammatory action

Monascus purpureus Went has an anti-inflammatory effect, which is closely related to the various anti-inflammatory components it contains. Polyphenols and flavonoids in Monascus purpureus Went have antioxidant and free-radical scavenging ability, which can reduce the inflammatory response caused by oxidative stress. Studies have shown that Monascus purpureus Went can reduce serum TNF-α and CRP levels in inflammatory mouse models, confirming the anti-inflammatory effect of Monascus purpureus Went (Wang et al., 2006a; Wang et al., 2008), which makes Monascus purpureus Went potentially useful in the treatment of non-infectious inflammatory diseases, such as arthritis and dermatitis.

4.3.4 Anti-tumor activity

In recent years, important progress has also been made in research on the anti-tumor effects of Monascus purpureus Went. Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharides and Monascus pigments in Monascus purpureus Went have an effect on inhibiting the growth and proliferation of tumor cells. These components affect the metabolism and signal transduction pathway of tumor cells through different pathways, thus exerting an anti-tumor effect. By determining the tumor inhibition rate, relative growth rate, and index of each organ in loaded mice, it was found that erythrocyte extracellular polysaccharides had a tumor-inhibitory effect on H22-loaded mice in vivo (Zhou et al., 2011). The determination of body weight, tumor weight, tumor suppression rate, and changes in spleen weight and spleen index of the loaded mice indicated that Monascus purpureus Went polysaccharides had a good inhibitory effect on tumor growth in loaded mice (Ding, 2007). Although the application of Monascus purpureus Went in anti-tumor therapy is still in the research stage, its potential should not be ignored.

4.4 Methodological quality

4.4.1 Methodological quality of animal studies

The methodological quality assessment of animal studies related to Monascus purpureus Went found that most studies only reported “randomization,” while a few used the random number table. Assignment concealment and blinding of investigators or animal handlers and evaluators of results were not reported in most studies, which may have led to subjective bias in the expected experimental results, and only a few used assignment concealment and blinding. A number of studies did not report the randomization of the environment in which the animals were placed, which may have influenced objective environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and light intensity in different locations on the experimental results. The result data were completely reported. In conclusion, it is necessary to improve the generation of random allocation sequences, allocation concealment, application of blinding, and randomness of the environment in animal studies related to Monascus purpureus Went.

4.4.2 Methodological quality of clinical trials

The methodological quality assessment of clinical trials related to Monascus purpureus Went found that most trials only reported “randomization,” while a few used the random number table and lottery. Assignment concealment and blinding of patients and outcome evaluators were not reported in most trials, which may increase the risk of measurement bias and evaluator bias, and only a few used assignment concealment and blinding. Some trials did not report registration and conflict of interest, which could lead to inappropriate influence from sponsors. Outcome data were completely reported. In conclusion, it is necessary to improve the generation of random allocation sequences, allocation concealment, application of blinding, and reporting of funding sources in clinical trials related to Monascus purpureus Went.

4.4.3 Suggestion for the study design

The common problems of methodological quality deficiencies in both animal studies and clinical trials are obvious, and the following suggestions are made: first, it is suggested that suitable random sequence generation methods, such as the random number table method, should be used to ensure the randomness and fairness of the allocation process. Second, it is suggested that allocation concealment and application of the double-blind method, including blinding of operators and observers, should be implemented. The person in charge of the operation should not know which group each patient is assigned to, in order to eliminate operator-induced subjective bias in the results. The person responsible for data collection and analysis should also not know the specific group to which each patient is assigned. The process of data collection and analysis should be carried out independently to ensure the objectivity and accuracy of the results. In addition, it is suggested that other conditions (e.g., environment and operation) should be strictly controlled for consistency during the study to ensure the reliability and repeatability of results. Finally, during data analysis, care should be taken to control the effect of confounding factors and other biases and to report in detail on the source of funding and registration to ensure the objectivity and accuracy of the results.

4.5 Limitation

There are some limitations to this review. First, the English-language literature obtained from the search was relatively limited. Second, the studies mainly focus on molecular and animal studies, with relatively few clinical trials. Third, some of the studies are of poor quality, and the reference value of their results may therefore be limited. Fourth, excluding studies for which the full texts could not be obtained may lead to data bias. Fifth, some of the clinical trials contained partially unreported information about the subjects, such as the patient source, enrollment time, and age range, which may reduce the strictness of the study. Sixth, only two meta-analyses were obtained and assessed for methodological quality and reporting standards in this study, and the results showed that they were of low quality, but due to their small number, these studies were not examined and described in detail in order to avoid study bias. The assessment of methodological quality and reporting standards for meta-analyses are presented in Supplementary Adds S2, S3.

4.6 Research implications

4.6.1 Clinical safety

Existing studies have shown that the contraindications for Monascus purpureus Went productions mainly include the following: ① patients allergic to monacolin K/lovastatin or any excipients; ② patients with acute liver disease; ③ patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min); ④ patients with various myopathies; and ⑤ pregnant women, lactating women, and women of childbearing age who have not taken effective contraceptive measures (Banach et al., 2022). It is recommended that its importance be emphasized in clinical practice.

4.6.2 Fundamental research challenges

In terms of the bioactive ingredient biosynthetic pathways and regulatory mechanisms of substances produced during Monascus fermentation, the current challenges in the development of Monascus purpureus Went include improving the content of active ingredients like lovastatin and controlling the content of toxic metabolites like citrinin through methods such as optimizing fermentation parameters, mutagenic breeding, and genetic engineering.

4.6.3 Other suggestions

More contamination risks derive from raw materials, microbial metabolism, or processing errors; the suggestions for the production quality control of Monascus purpureus Went are as follows: first, the quality control of raw materials should be optimized, the standardized management of fermentation strains should be strengthened, and high-quality fermentation strains should be accurately identified and screened. Second, the quality detection standard system should be improved, the specifications for the determination of active ingredient contents should be clarified, and the detection scope of safety indicators should be expanded. Third, the production process system must be optimized, the operation process must be standardized, fermentation parameters must be improved, and fermentation conditions must be strictly controlled. Fourth, the construction of the regulatory system must be improved, mandatory third-party safety reviews must be implemented, and the post-market supervision of products must be strengthened.

To promote the high-quality development of Monascus purpureus Went studies, the suggestions are as follows: first, standards should be set up. Unified quality standards for experimental design and efficacy evaluation should be developed to improve comparability between different studies. The production process and quality control of Monascus purpureus Went should be standardized to ensure the stable quality of Monascus purpureus Went products used in research and application. Second, multidisciplinary cooperation should be promoted. Experts in the fields of pharmacy, medicine, biology, and other multidisciplinary fields should be encouraged to cooperate in the studies and explore the pharmacological action mechanism of Monascus purpureus Went in depth from different perspectives. Third, the research and development of new drugs should be encouraged. Modern preparation technology should be actively used to develop new Monascus purpureus Went preparations with more stable efficacy. Fourth, more research on the combination of Monascus purpureus Went and other drugs should be encouraged to observe the therapeutic effect and safety. Fifth, human pharmacokinetic studies and clinical trials should be performed to explore the effective dosage range of Monascus purpureus Went products, validate safety and prevent adverse events, and provide evidentiary support for clinical practice. Concurrently, key procedures, including ethical review and informed consent, must be strictly implemented throughout the process.

5 Conclusion

As a type of traditional Chinese medicine, the pharmacological action mechanism of Monascus purpureus Went is extensive and complex. Given the extensive global use of Monascus purpureus Went products, we have gradually revealed its mechanism of action in regulating blood lipids and exerting anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-tumor effects through modern science research and technology. Moreover, we also need to pay attention to the contraindications and safety issues associated with the use of Monascus purpureus Went to ensure its safety and effectiveness in our daily lives.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

SL: formal analysis, investigation, visualization, and writing – original draft. YX: formal analysis, investigation, visualization, and writing – original draft. JX: formal analysis, investigation, visualization, and writing – original draft. JH: data curation and writing – original draft. YW: methodology, supervision, and writing – review and editing. JZ: project administration, supervision, and writing – review and editing. SL: conceptualization and writing – review and editing. HH: conceptualization, project administration, supervision, and writing – review and editing. LA: conceptualization, supervision, and writing – review and editing. ZJ: conceptualization, project administration, supervision, and writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Promoting Breakthroughs in Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology: “Inheritance and Innovation” - Construction of Evidence-Based Research and Proactive Health in Traditional Chinese Medicine (20217-KL24040101), The first batch of scientific and technological projects of the Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Haihe Laboratory in 2025 - Construction and Application of an “Artificial Intelligence Agent for Evidence-Based Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine” Based on Large Reasoning Models (/), Tianjin Municipal Education Commission Research Plan Project (2023KJ124) and Chinese Medicine Innovation Team and Talent Support Plan-National Chinese Medicine multidisciplinary Innovation team project (ZYYCXTD-D-202204). Lin Ang and Myeong Soo Lee are supported by the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KSN2122211).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the funding agencies for their support and all the authors for their dedicated contributions and efforts in bringing this study to completion.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1600460/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

AA, automatic amino acid analyzer; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; ASA, anthrone–sulfuric acid; CE, capillary electrophoresis; CNKI, China National Knowledge Infrastructure; DNS, dinitrosalicylic acid; FAAS, flame atomic absorption spectroscopy; GC, gas chromatography; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; PSA, phenol–sulfuric acid; QuEChERS-UPLC-MRM-IDA Criteria-EPI; quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe–ultra-performance liquid chromatography–multiple reaction monitoring–ion-dependent acquisition–criteria-enhanced product ion; RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA; SMF, secondary metabolite fingerprint; SPSS CA, statistical package for the social sciences cluster analysis; SPSS PCA, statistical package for the social sciences principal component analysis; TC, total cholesterol; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; TG, triglyceride; TLCS, thin-layer chromatography scan.

References

  • 1

    BanachM.CatapanoA. L.CiceroA.EscobarC.FogerB.KatsikiN. (2022). Red yeast rice for dyslipidaemias and cardiovascular risk reduction: a position paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel. Pharmacol. Res.183, 106370. 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106370

  • 2

    CaiQ.ShenB.ZhangH.ChengD. (2010). Extraction of extracellular polysaccharides from Fermentum Rubrum and determination of antioxidant activity. Chin. Arch. Tradit. Chin. Med.28 (03), 598600. 10.13193/j.archtcm.2010.03.151.caiq.067

  • 3

    CaoH.WuQ. (2009). Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for the study of trace element content in traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum. J. Southwest Univ. Natl. Nat. Sci. Ed.35 (04), 789792.

  • 4

    CaoH.ZhuJ.YangC.WangR. (2007). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Fermentum Rubrum capsule for reducing sugar on type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Tradit. Chin. Med.29 (05), 307308.

  • 5

    ChenJ.LiZ.QiW.LiuZ.LiB. (2007a). High performance capillary electrophoresis analysis method for detecting the content of hesperidin in traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum. China J. Chin. Mater. Med.14, 14121415.

  • 6

    ChenJ.LiZ.QiW.LiuZ.LiB. (2008). Determination of citrine in fermentum Rubrum by RP HPLC. West China J. Pharm. Sci. (02), 219220. 10.13375/j.cnki.wcjps.2008.02.026

  • 7

    ChenL.ChenT.WuJ. (2007b). Analysis of amino acid composition in Fermentum Rubrum. Str. Pharm. (02), 5355.

  • 8

    ChenL.ZhangS.DengY.LiuH. (2021). Clinical observation of the combination treatment of hyperlipidemia and abnormal liver function with Fermentum Rubrum. Liaoning J. Tradit. Chin. Med.48 (07), 104107. 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2021.07.029

  • 9

    ChenW.LiuF. (2015). Clinical observation on the effect of dietary therapy with Danxi Fermentum Rubrum liquor on lowering blood lipids and blood sugar. China Naturop.23 (10), 7778. 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2015.10.063

  • 10

    ChenX.ZhaoJ. (2007). Determination of monacolin K in Fermentum Rubrum by high performance liquid chromatography. Chem. Bioeng. (Wuhan. China) (12), 7475+78.

  • 11

    ChenY.ChenC.ZhangS. (2005). Effect of Lovastatin from Red Kojic on lipid metabolism and expression of lipoprotein lipase mRNA in hyperlipidemic mice. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs.36 (5). 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2670.2005.05.032

  • 12

    ChenY.PengD.TianH. (2000). Research and application of Fermentum Rubrum and Aspergillus spp. J. Hubei Agric. Coll.20 (2).

  • 13

    ChenY.ZhangG.YeZ. (2010). Study on the lipid-lowering effect of compound Fermentum Rubrum extract on hyperlipidemic rats. China J. Chin. Mater. Med.35 (04), 504507. 10.4268/cjcmm20100422

  • 14

    CuiC.ZhouK.YangL.ZhaiY.QiX. (2002). Clinical observation on the treatment of 45 cases of hyperlipidemia with compound Fermentum Rubrum capsule. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med. (02), 3134.

  • 15

    DingH. (2007). Preliminary study on the anti-tumor effect of Fermentum Rubrum polysaccharides. J. Fungal Res. (03), 171173. 10.13341/j.jfr.2007.03.012

  • 16

    DingY.RenH. (2023). The lipid-lowering effect of Fermentum Rubrum earthworm protein tablet on hyperlipidemic rats. Ind. Microbiol. (Shanghai, China)53 (04), 104106.

  • 17

    DuX.ChenY. (2013). Study on the acute toxicity and mutability of Fermentum Rubrum extract. Food Res. Dev. (Tianjin, China)34 (05), 46+30.

  • 18

    EndoA. (1980). Monacolin K, a new hypocholesterolemic agent that specifically inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo)33 (3), 334336. 10.7164/antibiotics.33.334

  • 19

    FanW. (2013). Determination of lovastatin content in Fermentum Rubrum by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Mod. Med. Health.29 (16), 24172419+2421.

  • 20

    FangJ.WangC.WangL.ShiW.GuoY.LiY.et al (2021). Comparative study on the determination methods of polysaccharide content in Fermentum Rubrum Fuling tablets. Lishizhen Med. Mater. Med. Res.32 (11), 26722676.

  • 21

    GaoS.HuangC.HeZ. (2015). Study on the weight loss and lipid-lowering effects of Fengfengtongsheng powder combined with Fermentum Rubrum. Asia Pac. Tradit. Med.11 (24). 10.11954/ytctyy.201524005

  • 22

    GaoW.LinY.DaiG.ZhaoL. (2022). Simultaneous determination of adenosine and three other components in Fermentum Rubrum from different sources by HPLC method. Pharm. Clin. Res.30 (02), 140142. 10.13664/j.cnki.pcr.2022.02.022

  • 23

    GaoY.YuC.YanG.LinX.LuF.ShenJ. (2016). Observation of the therapeutic effect of functional Fermentum Rubrum on hyperlipidemia. Front. Med.6 (18).

  • 24

    GeF.WangY.WangJ.YuH.LiC. (2012). Research on the main active components in Fermentum Rubrum. J. Kunming Univ. Sci. Technol. Nat. Sci.37 (02), 6164.

  • 25

    HaoS.WangL.LiH.ZhangD.XuH. (2017). Simultaneous determination of lovastatin and lovastatin acid in Fermentum Rubrum and Zhibituo tablets by QAMS. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.23 (5). 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2017050074

  • 26

    HeS.LouX.ZhangR.XuJ. (2007). Observation on the clinical effect of Fermentum Rubrum Flavonoids tablets in regulating blood lipids. Chin. Prev. Med. (03), 284286.

  • 27

    HeY. (2004). Effect of fermented extract of Fermentum Rubrum garlic on hyperlipemia and arteriosclerosis lesions in cholesterol-loaded rabbits. Int. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. (06), 347348.

  • 28

    HuangH. (2000). Separation and determination of lovastatin in Fermentum Rubrum by HPLC method. Str. J. Prev. Med. (04), 4041.

  • 29

    HuangP.ZhangR. (2005). Influence of Xue Zhi Kang on C-reaction albumen of early plasma in unstable colic patients. Chin. Med. Mod. Disrance Educ. China.3 (12). 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2005.12.022

  • 30

    HuangX.ChenP.ChenL.HuY. (2014). Determination of Monacolin K content in water soluble Fermentum Rubrum by HPLC method. Zhejiang J. Tradit. Chin. Med.49 (09), 685686.

  • 31

    HuangY.ZhouD.YuQ. (2019). Research on the auxiliary lipid-lowering function of Fermentum Rubrum propolis tablets. Food Res. Dev. (Tianjin, China)40 (08), 195199.

  • 32

    JiangL.LiS.LiuZ.HaoZ.HeJ. (2008). Effect of Fermentum Rubrum and grape seed anthocyanidin mixture on blood lipid in atherosclerotic rats. Food Sci. (Beijing, China) (07), 420423.

  • 33

    JiangY.DongY.ZhouF.ChenJ.ZhouY.TianC.et al (2021). Research progress on chemical composition, pharmacological effects and clinical applications of Fermentum Rubrum. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs52 (23), 73797388.

  • 34

    KongY.LiuL.WuM. (2005). Research progress on lipid-lowering Fermentum Rubrum at home and abroad. Heilongjiang J. Tradit. Chin. Med. (06), 5657.

  • 35

    LeiP.GuoJ.JinZ. (2007). Biochemical mechanism of Fermentum Rubrum in reducing blood pressure in renal vascular hypertension rats. J. Liaoning Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med. (03), 217218. 10.13194/j.jlunivtcm.2007.03.219.leip.147

  • 36

    LiG.LiH. (2008). Determination of lovastatin in fermentation broth of Monascus by HPLC. Guangdong Pharm. J.24 (3).

  • 37

    LiX.XueL.ZhouL.DuanZ.GuoS. (2011). HPLC method for detecting kumquat in Xuezhikang capsule. China Pharm. (Wuhan. China)14 (08), 10881090.

  • 38

    LiY.ZhangC.YangY.ChenZ. (2019). HPLC determination of seven nucleoside components in Fermentum Rubrum. China Med. Her.16 (12), 101104.

  • 39

    LiY.ZhangX.QinM. (2010). HPLC method for determination of Monacolin K, Monacolin K, and dehydromonacolin K in functional Fermentum Rubrum extract. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs.41 (08), 12861288.

  • 40

    LinP.XingW.MiH.WangX.WuH. (2001). Determination of trace elements in the Chinese traditional medicine--Red Kojic by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Pharm. Care Res.1 (1). 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2838.2001.01.014

  • 41

    LinX.ZhouY.XuM.LinX.ShaoS.ZhuX.et al (2014). The effect of traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum on the expression of PPAR γ and adiponectin receptor in hyperlipidemic rats. Zhejiang Med. J.36 (21), 17671770.

  • 42

    LiuJ.ZhangJ.LiuX.ZhangR.LeN.ZhangS.et al (2020). Exploring the effect of Fermentum Rubrum Fuling tablets on rats with spleen deficiency and dampness excess hyperlipidemia based on the theory of dialectical health care. Glob. Tradit. Chin. Med.13 (11), 18371845.

  • 43

    LiuL.WuM.WangH.ZhangW. (2011). A randomized controlled study of lipid lowering Fermentum Rubrum micro powder in the treatment of dyslipidemia with carotid atherosclerosis. Chin. J. Integr. Tradit. West. Med. Chin. Ed.31 (09), 11961200.

  • 44

    LiuX. (2007). Determination of lovastatin content in Xuezhikang soft capsules by high performance liquid chromatography. Jiangxi J. Tradit. Chin. Med.38 (7). 10.3969/j.issn.0411-9584.2007.07.054

  • 45

    LiuY.PengL.HuC. (2021). Study on the lipid regulating efficacy and safety of Ginkgo Fermentum Rubrum vitamin formula. New Chin. Med.52 (07), 508512.

  • 46

    LiuY.WuM.HuY.WangX.DingK. (2019). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum flavins on blood lipids and liver AMPK α ACC, PPAR - α, and CPT1 protein expression in hyperlipidemic rats. Chin. J. Tradit. Med. Sci. Technol.26 (03), 351356.

  • 47

    LiuZ.LaiW.LiuD.MeiS.FuY. (2013). Study on the lipid-lowering effect of compound Fermentum Rubrum capsules in rats. J. Food Saf. Qual.4 (03), 819822. 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.2013.03.029

  • 48

    LiuZ.WangX.ZhaoK. (1998). Clinical observation of Zhibituo in the treatment of 76 cases of hyperlipidemia. Mod. J. Integr. Tradit. Chin. West. Med. (02), 194195.

  • 49

    LuJ.LuY.JinH.XuX.ShenJ.RenJ.et al (2017). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum on serum ALP, TRAP, and bone tissue TNF - α, RANK expression in osteoporotic rat model after ovariectomy. Chin. J. Tradit. Med. Traumatol. Orthop.25 (09), 58.

  • 50

    LuJ.QianX.HuaJ.HuaW.ZhuX. (2008). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum on inducing differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells into osteoblasts. China J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Pharm. (2005-) (06), 541544.

  • 51

    LuJ.WangW.ChenB. (2006). Effect of Fermentum Rubrum on proliferation, differentiation and mineralization function of osteoblasts in vitro. Chin. J. Tradit. Med. Traumatol. Orthop. (02), 4145.

  • 52

    LuJ.WangW.WuC.YangL.WangJ. (2005b). Correlation study of Fermentum Rubrum on bone mineral density and bone mechanics changes in rats. Zhejiang J. Integr. Tradit. West. Med. (09), 529531.

  • 53

    LuJ.WuC.NiG.WangW.WangJ. (2005a). Fermentum Rubrum versus ovariectomized rats BMP experimental studies of expression and osteoblast proliferation. China J. Orthop. Traumatol. (01), 2931.

  • 54

    LuJ.WuC.WangW.WangJ.YangL. (2004). Effect of Fermentum Rubrum on serum hormone levels, bone density, and bone biomechanics in castrated rats. Chin. J. Tradit. Med. Traumatol. Orthop. (04), 2225.

  • 55

    LuS.YuQ.Si-tuY. (2016). Protective effect of red yeast rice capsule containing coenzyme Q10 on osteoporosis in rats induced by ovariectomy combined with D-galactose. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull.32 (9). 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1978.2016.09.013

  • 56

    LuS.ZhangL.HeX.DingH.WuT. (2019). Determination of lovastatin and coenzyme Q_ (10) in functional Fermentum Rubrum powder. Guangzhou Chem. Ind.47 (18), 9295.

  • 57

    LuX.HuY.WangX.GaoS. (2012). Clinical observation of Xuezhikang in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Hubei J. Tradit. Chin. Med.34 (09), 3839.

  • 58

    LuoH.ZhongZ. (2020). The effect of Tibetan Fermentum Rubrum on blood lipids in patients with dyslipidemia. China Naturop.28 (16), 5759. 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2020.1628

  • 59

    LuoJ.SunQ.MaZ.HeZ.LiX. (2019). The gastrointestinal regulatory effects of fermented Fermentum Rubrum on mice with spleen deficiency and food accumulation syndrome before and after processing. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.25 (22), 108114. 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20192252

  • 60

    LuoR.SunK.XieS.HanY.ZhaoY. (2003). Method for determining the total amount of lovastatin in Fermentum Rubrum. J. Hyg. Res.32 (02), 157158.

  • 61

    LuoW.ZhangQ. (2011). Tissue and biochemical study of Fermentum Rubrum improving non alcoholic fatty liver in rats. Chin. J. Gen. Pract.9 (12), 18421843+1853. 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2011.12.012

  • 62

    LuoW.ZhangQ.LvZ. (2010). Study on the mechanism of Fermentum Rubrum improving insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats. Tradit. Chin. Drug Res. Clin. Pharmacol.21 (04), 375378. 10.19378/j.issn.1003-9783.2010.04.014

  • 63

    LvS.HeX.ZhangL.DingH.WuT. (2020). Determination of lovastatin content in Fermentum Rubrum capsules by HPLC method. Str. Pharm.32 (03), 6366.

  • 64

    MaH.GaoM.LiX.ZhaoW.YingY. (2022). Genetic toxicity evaluation of Sanqi Fermentum Rubrum compound preparation. Food Drug24 (01), 2125.

  • 65

    MaY. (2025). “The Kobayashi Pharmaceutical scandal in Japan continues to ferment,” in Guangming Dly. Guangming Dly. 008.

  • 66

    Ou-yangZ.LiY.LiangG.JinH.KangD. (2012). The effect of buckwheat Fermentum Rubrum on blood lipid levels in experimental hyperlipidemic rats. J. Yanbian Med. Coll.35 (01), 2527. 10.16068/j.1000-1824.2012.01.008

  • 67

    PanR.FangZ.TangX.ZhengL.WangD. (2023). Research progress on secondary metabolites and pharmacological effects of Monascus purpureus. West China J. Pharm. Sci.38 (03), 345351. 10.13375/j.cnki.wcjps.2023.03.024

  • 68

    PangZ.LiP.HuangY.LiuY.JiangY. (2017). The animal experimental study of Natto-monascus on hyperlipidemia. Mod. Food.7 (14). 10.16736/j.cnki.cn41-1434/ts.2017.14.028

  • 69

    QiF.RenD.HuangZ.QinL.ZhuB. (2021). Determination of lovastatin and citrine in Fermentum Rubrum from 16 production areas. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med.43 (04), 948953.

  • 70

    QianS.WangY.YeY. (2015). The effect of alcohol extracted Fermentum Rubrum on BMP-4 mRNA and protein expression during fracture healing in osteoporotic rats. Chin. J. Tradit. Med. Sci. Technol.22 (03), 284286.

  • 71

    QiuL.HaoJ.GuanC. (1997). Observation on the treatment of 112 cases of hyperlipidemia with Fermentum Rubrum extract preparation. China Naturop. (06), 34. 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.1997.06.052

  • 72

    QiuW.LiuX.ZhengK.FuW. (2012). Immuno-affinity chromatographic purification: the study of methods to test citrinin in monascus products by high performance liquid chromatography. Chin. J. Prev. Med. (Beijing).46 (8), 750753. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2012.08.017

  • 73

    ShenJ.LuJ.XuX.JinH.RenJ.LuY.et al (2018). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum on the expression of RANKL, OPG protein and mRNA in bone tissue of ovariectomized rats. China J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Pharm. (2005-).33 (04), 13701372.

  • 74

    ShiM.ZhaoY.HuG.BaiH.LiuQ.ZhangJ. (2015). Clinical observation on the lipid-lowering effect of Fermentum Rubrumt tea drink on elderly patients. Pract. J. Med. Pharm.32 (04), 328329. 10.14172/j.cnki.issn1671-4008.2015.04.015

  • 75

    SongH.MiH.GuoT. (1999a). Research progress of traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum. J. Pharm. Pract. (03), 4446.

  • 76

    SongH.MiH.GuoT.WuW.ChuW. (1999b). Determination of lovastatin in Hongqu from various sources by HPLC. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs (2). 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2670.1999.02.009

  • 77

    SuS.LiuC.YinQ.LiH.LiuJ.ChengM. (2014). The effects of Xuezhikang on the functions of endothelial Progenitor cells isolated from experimental hyperlipidemic rats. Prog. Mod. Biomed.14 (36). 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2014.36.009

  • 78

    SunJ.SuH.LiaoX.GuiW.FangY.HanL.et al (2022). Exploring the mechanism of action of Fermentum Rubrum in treating cerebral small vessel disease based on network pharmacology and animal experiments. Cent. South Pharm.20 (02), 278283.

  • 79

    SunJ. (2025). “Warning and Inspiration from the “Red Yeast Storm” at Kobayashi Pharmaceutical,” in Xinhua Dly. Telegraph. 004

  • 80

    SunM.LiY.YanW. (2001a). Study on the effect of Fermentum Rubrum on improving hemorheology in hyperlipidemic rats. J. Hyg. Res.30 (03), 173175.

  • 81

    SunM.LiY.YanW. (2001b). Study on the effect of Fermentum Rubrum in lowering blood pressure. J. Hyg. Res.30 (4). 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8020.2001.04.006

  • 82

    TanY.MaY.LiuQ.WangW.HuangF. (2015). Research on the quality standards of Qingke Fermentum Rubrum. World Sci. Technol. Mod. Tradit. Chin. Med.17 (03), 614619.

  • 83

    TangC.ChangH. (2012). The effect of Xuezhikang on blood lipids and hemorheology. Chin. Commun. Dr.14 (22). 10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2012.22.249

  • 84

    TangF.ZhangJ.ZouJ.SunW.JiaoX. (2004). Fermentum Rubrum Preliminary study on the antihypertensive effect of L-nitroarginine in hypertensive rats. Food Sci. (Beijing, China) (04), 155157.

  • 85

    WangC. (2000). HPLC detection of lovastatin in functional Fermentum Rubrum. J. Beijing Univ. Agric. (02), 4851. 10.13473/j.cnki.issn.1002-3186.2000.02.010

  • 86

    WangH.ZhouD.XuS.YeH. (2005). Experimental study on the effect of compound Fermentum Rubrum in regulating blood lipid. Chin. J. Health Lab. Technol. (05), 540541.

  • 87

    WangJ. (2014). Simultaneous determination of two configurations of Lovastatin in Fermentum Rubrum by HPLC method. Zhejiang J. Integr. Tradit. West. Med.24 (03), 273274.

  • 88

    WangJ.KangR.Ji-Le-TuH.LiangH.HongL.YanL.et al (2020). Determination of total lovastatin in hongmao medicinal wine. J. North. Pharm.17 (9). 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8351.2020.09.001

  • 89

    WangJ.WangX.ShiB. (2016). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Shengqu Fermentum Rubrum capsule on carotid atherosclerosis. Drug Eval. Res.39 (06), 10541057.

  • 90

    WangJ.YangB.WangX.ShiZ. (2014). Determination of treatment course and observation of efficacy of Shengqu Fermentum Rubrum capsules in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Drugs Clin.29 (08), 888890.

  • 91

    WangL. (2019). Experimental study on the lipid-lowering effect of Fermentum Rubrum on high-fat rats. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Electron. Ed.)8 (04), 5051.

  • 92

    WangL.TianY.MeiC. (2000). Effect of Fermentum Rubrum extract on serum lipid profile and glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic syndrome. Chin. J. Integr. Tradit. West. Nephrol. (03), 154156.

  • 93

    WangQ.QiF.BaoB.SunQ. (2024a). Isolation and ITS molecular identification of high-yield Lovastatin producing purple Monascus purpureus. Chin. Pharm. J.59 (03), 220226.

  • 94

    WangS.GuoZ.ZhouB.HeY.LiD.TaoP.et al (2024b). Research progress on safety and quality control of red yeast rice. Chin. Pharm. J.59 (13), 11861192.

  • 95

    WangT.LiJ. (2018). The treatment of hyperlipidemia with traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum decoction and its effect on vascular endothelial protection. J. Liaoning Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med.20 (08), 119121. 10.13194/j.issn.1673-842x.2018.08.031

  • 96

    WangW.WangJ.SuM.LuZ.KouW. (1995). Clinical observation of Xuezhikang capsules in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae. (01), 3741.

  • 97

    WangX.GaoX.HuangT.LiC. (2007). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum compound preparation on blood lipid regulation function in rats. Shaanxi Med. J. (01), 3537.

  • 98

    WangX.ZouD.LiH.LiD. (2022). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum on blood lipids and nutritional status of hemodialysis patients. Chin. J. Gerontol.42 (23). 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2022.23.015

  • 99

    WangY. (2016). QuEChERS UPLC-MRM-IDA criteria EPI determination of lovastatin in Fermentum Rubrum. China Licens. Pharm.13 (10), 2124+39.

  • 100

    WangY.GaoX. (2006). Research on the quality standards of Zhibituo capsule. Sichuan Med. J. (05), 451452. 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2006.05.006

  • 101

    WangY.WeiW.LiC. (2002). The therapeutic effect of special Fermentum Rubrum on experimental fatty liver disease in quail. Chin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. (04), 293295.

  • 102

    WangY.ZhaoZ.HuangF.RenJ. (2006a). Research on the anti-inflammatory mechanism of Fermentum Rubrum. Chin. Rem. Clin. (05), 350352.

  • 103

    WangY.ZhaoZ.HuangF.RenJ. (2006b). Experimental study on the anti-inflammatory effect of Fermentum Rubrum. Chin. J. New Drugs. (02), 9698.

  • 104

    WangY.ZhaoZ.WangL.HuangF. (2008). The anti-inflammatory effect and mechanism of Fermentum Rubrum on collagen induced arthritis rats. Chin. J. New Drugs. (14), 12171221.

  • 105

    WeiR.ZhangX.HuS.ZhangQ.ZhangW. (2023). Reconstructed herb —— Fermentum Rubrum. Jilin J. Tradit. Chin. Med.43 (02), 222224. 10.13463/j.cnki.jlzyy.2023.02.025

  • 106

    WenJ.ChangP.GuX.JinZ. (2001). Research progress on physiological activity and determination methods of Fermentum Rubrum and Lovastatin. China Food Addit. (01), 1219.

  • 107

    WenZ.ZhangF.HuangY.XieJ.LuoJ.WeiZ.et al (2011). Determination of Fermentum Rubrum content in Zhibitai capsules. China Pharm.20 (13), 2123.

  • 108

    WuC.HuangJ.WangW.LuJ. (2007a). Bone tissue morphometric observation of Fermentum Rubrumt promoting fracture healing in experimental rats. J. Zhejiang Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med. (01), 4143. 10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2007.01.015

  • 109

    WuC.HuangJ.WangW.LuJ. (2007b). Experimental study on the treatment of experimental rat fractures with Fermentum Rubrum. Fujian J. Tradit. Chin. Med. (01), 4244.

  • 110

    WuC.LuJ.WangW.ChenB. (2006). The effect of Fermentum Rubrum on BMP-2 expression in cultured rat osteoblasts in vitro. J. Tradit. Chin. Orthop. Traumatol. (05), 56+79.

  • 111

    WuM.WangW.ZhangW.ZhengG.LiuL. (2005). Clinical study on the treatment of hyperlipidemia with lipid-lowering Fermentum Rubrum micro powder. J. Shandong Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med. (06), 433435. 10.16294/j.cnki.1007-659x.2005.06.009

  • 112

    WuX.LuoD. (2013). Observation on the clinical effect of Fermentum Rubrum on carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Clin. J. Chin. Med.5 (22), 78.

  • 113

    XieJ.LiD.WangM.ChenZ.YuanW. (2010). Determination of Lovastatin content in Xuezhikang capsule by HPLC method. China Pharm. (Chongqing, China). 21 (45), 42874289.

  • 114

    XieZ. (1996). Further study on traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum by modern technology. China Med. news.22, 1314.

  • 115

    XuH.RuanJ.GaoF.LiM. (2019). Clinical study on the treatment of hyperlipidemia with Shateng Fermentum Rubrum soft capsules. Mod. Tradit. Chin. Med.39 (05), 6164. 10.13424/j.cnki.mtcm.2019.05.019

  • 116

    XuS.ShaoY.WuT. (2018). Overview of research on anti-tumor active ingredients extracted from Fermentum Rubrum. Glob. Tradit. Chin. Med.11 (06), 973978.

  • 117

    XuY.WeiL.HeD.WangM. (2000). Determination of phosphatidylcholine content in Fermentum Rubrum and its preparation Xuezhikang. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. (12), 1617.

  • 118

    XuY.WeiL.HeD.WangM. (2001). Thin layer scanning method for determining the content of daidzein in Fermentum Rubrum and its preparation Xuezhikang. China J. Chin. Mater. Med.26 (1). 10.3321/j.issn:1001-5302.2001.01.010

  • 119

    YanS. (1999). Development of vinegar bean capsule and the effect of lowering blood lipid. Fujian J. Tradit. Chin. Med. (01), 3940.

  • 120

    YangY.LiuJ.ZhangY.GuoZ.LuoY.ChenD.et al (2024). Observation of clinical efficacy and network pharmacological mechanism analysis of Coptis chinensis-Fermentum Rubrum drug in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Shaanxi Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med.47 (02), 7682. 10.13424/j.cnki.jsctcm.2024.02.015

  • 121

    YinM.YeH.FengS.ZhangX. (2016). Retrospective analysis of Fermentum Rubrum compound preparation in the treatment of primary dyslipidemia of phlegm turbidity and blood stasis type. Mod. Clin. Tradit. Chin. Med.23 (04), 811.

  • 122

    YuL.XuJ.ZhengJ.LuB. (2023). Exploring the mechanism of action of Fermentum Rubrum hawthorn in treating NASH based on network pharmacology and verifying the mechanism of NF - κ B signaling pathway. J. Zhejiang Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med.47 (09), 9861001. 10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2023.09.003

  • 123

    YuY.QuX.LiZ.GuoZ. (2000). Yunnan Fermentum Rubrum powder modulates blood lipid and anti-atherosclerotic plaque formation. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull. (05), 587588.

  • 124

    ZhaiP.ZhaoJ.ZhouD.HongX. (2012). Experimental study on the lipid-lowering effect of traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum compound preparation. J. Zhejiang Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med.36 (01), 7072. 10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2012.01.032

  • 125

    ZhangJ.MengF.MiaoT.JiL.ZhangJ. (2017). Study on the effects of Fermentum Rubrum polysaccharides on several important physiological indicators in rats. Heilongjiang J. Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. (05), 203205. 10.13881/j.cnki.hljxmsy.2017.0434

  • 126

    ZhangQ.WangJ.BaiG.WangH.CuiH. (2016). HPLC-DAD/FLD determination of the active ingredient Lovastatin and toxic ingredient kumquat in Fermentum Rubrum. Lishizhen Med. Mater. Med. Res.27 (04), 816819.

  • 127

    ZhangQ.WeiQ.TangB.JinQ.LiuH. (2008). Determination of Lovastatin content in Fermentum Rubrum capsule by capillary electrophoresis. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae. (11), 46. 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2008.11.005

  • 128

    ZhangS.MiW.ChenL. (2020). Observation on the therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum on hyperlipidemia of different TCM constitution types. J. Pract. Tradit. Chin. Intern. Med.34 (08), 5659. 10.13729/j.issn.1671-7813.Z20200152

  • 129

    ZhangW.HeW. (2016). Clinical observation on the treatment of 80 cases of simple hyperlipidemia with Fermentum Rubrum. Heilongjiang J. Tradit. Chin. Med.45 (06), 2122.

  • 130

    ZhangX.ZhangY.LuoY. (2023). Study on the effect of Coptis chinensis-Fermentum Rubrum medicine on regulating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway to improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. China J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Pharm. (2005-)39 (04), 1924. 10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.20230307.002

  • 131

    ZhangX.ZhouF.ShiJ. (1997). Determination of lovastatin content in Xuezhikang capsules and Fermentum Rubrum by high performance liquid chromatography. Chin. Med. News. (16), 2324.

  • 132

    ZhangY.HouT.ZhangS. (2001). The Dtermination of lovastatin in red yeast rice by HPLC. Food Sci. (Beijing, China)22 (7). 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2001.07.017

  • 133

    ZhangZ.LiuY.WuC. (2010). Determination of oleic acid and linoleic acid content in traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum by GC method. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.16 (02), 2325. 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2010.02.010

  • 134

    ZhaoJ.FeiY.ShaoY. (2018). The effect of traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum on blood lipids and liver function in patients with hyperlipidemia and liver dysfunction. J. Med. Theor. Pract.31 (21), 32263228. 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2018.21.031

  • 135

    ZhaoJ.LiuX. (2011). Study on the lipid-lowering effect of Fermentum Rubrum plant sterol ester compound preparation. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs42 (11), 22962299.

  • 136

    ZhengJ.GuoJ.JinZ. (2007). Study on the hypotensive mechanism of Fermentum Rubrum on spontaneously hypertensive rats. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. (03), 207208+236.

  • 137

    ZhengW.LinJ.LinF.WuL. (2022). Comparison of lipid-lowering efficacy of functional Monascus and lovastatin. China Brew.41 (4). 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2022.04.019

  • 138

    ZhengY.LiY. (2015). Clinical study on the treatment of hyperlipidemia with Fermentum Rubrum extract preparation. Clin. J. Chin. Med.7 (09), 3637.

  • 139

    ZhouD. (2014). The effect of traditional Chinese medicine Fermentum Rubrum on blood lipids in high-fat diet rats. China Mod. Med.21 (16), 1921.

  • 140

    ZhouF.ZhuX.PanP.ChenY.ChengD. (2011). Study on the anti-tumor activity of extracellular polysaccharides from Monascus purpureus. Chin. Arch. Tradit. Chin. Med.29 (01), 123124. 10.13193/j.archtcm.2011.01.125.zhoufm.063

  • 141

    ZhouX.WangM.LuoW.WangL.GaoF.WeiP. (2018). Experimental study on the lipid-lowering effect of Seabuckthorn Fermentum Rubrum capsules. Pharmacol. Clin. Chin. Mater. Med.34 (05), 116118. 10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.2018.05.028

  • 142

    ZhuQ. (2013). Observation of the clinical efficacy of Xuezhikang capsule in the treatment of 40 cases of unstable angina Pectoris. Everyone’s Health (Late Ed.)7 (2).

  • 143

    ZhuW.JingG.ZhaoR.BiT.ZhaoD.WangS.et al (2023). Simultaneous determination of 10 fungal toxins in Fermentum Rubrum by HPLC tandem mass spectrometry. China Pharm.32 (03), 8993.

  • 144

    ZhuY.LinX.YanG. (2025). “Kobayashi Pharmaceutical's health product scandal shakes Japan,” in Global Times. p 004.

Summary

Keywords

Monascus purpureus Went, pharmacological effects, pharmacological mechanisms, scope review, evidence

Citation

Liu S, Xu Y, Xie J, Hu J, Wang Y, Zhang J, Lee MS, Hu H, Ang L and Ji Z (2025) The pharmacology and mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went: a scoping review. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1600460. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1600460

Received

26 March 2025

Accepted

11 June 2025

Published

30 July 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Ruyu Yao, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Reviewed by

Yanfeng Liu, Jiangnan University, China

Sabreena Safuan, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, Malaysia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Haiyin Hu, ; Lin Ang, ; Zhaochen Ji,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics