- 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, Guntur, India
- 2Department of Environment Studies, Federal Centre of Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), Contagem, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- 3Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi, India
The symbiotic interplay between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota constitutes a focal point in contemporary scientific investigations, with profound impact in human health and diseases. The human gastrointestinal milieu serves as the locus for a diverse consortium of microbial organisms, collectively constituting the gut microbiota, which intricately modulate host metabolism, immune responses, and overall homeostasis. Dysregulation of gut microbial composition and functionality, known as dysbiosis, has been implicated in the progression of a plethora of gastrointestinal and systemic maladies, encompassing inflammatory bowel diseases, metabolic syndromes and neurological disorders, and so on. Polyphenols abundant in plant-derived food, exert multifaceted biological activities, encompassing antioxidative, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties, among many others. These polyphenolic metabolites inextricably interact with the gut microbiota, exerting modulatory effects on microbial composition and functionality, thereby promoting the symbiotic physiological relationships between microbe and human host. In reciprocal fashion, the gut microbiota serves as pivotal vectors in the metabolism and bioavailability of polyphenols, engendering bioactive signalling metabolites which regulate systemic physiological effects and thereby maintain host health. This review emphasizes the imperative of comprehensively delineating an interplay between polyphenolic metabolites and gut microbiota in maintaining host health, while reflecting potential interventions of protective health outcomes in disease conditions.
1 Introduction
In recent years, the intricate symbiotic relationship between dietary polyphenols and human gut microbiota has emerged as a focal point in scientific investigations due to its profound implications in human health and diseases. The human gastrointestinal tract is host to a dynamic and densely populated microbial ecosystem, collectively referred to as the gut microbiota, which plays a pivotal role in modulating host physiology and biochemical metabolic systems (Jyoti and Dey, 2025). The human gut microbiota represents a highly heterogeneous consortium of microorganisms, encompassing bacteria, archaea, viruses, and fungi, which coexist in a dynamic equilibrium with the host (Nazir et al., 2024). This intricate microbial ecosystem exhibits a vast phylogenetic diversity, predominantly comprising members of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, with distinct genera and species exerting differential functional roles within the gut environment. The composition and diversity of gut microbiota are subject to dynamic modulation by various endogenous and exogenous factors, including host genetics, dietary habits, environmental exposures, antibiotic usage, and lifestyle factors (Babaei, 2019; Townsend et al., 2021). Mounting evidence implicates dysbiosis, defined as dysregulation (alteration) in gut microbiota composition and functionality, in the pathogenesis of a myriad of gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal disorders (Singh et al., 2021). Moreover, emerging research demonstrates the role of dysbiosis in neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune diseases, and microbial infections, highlighting the implications of gut microbiota dysregulation on host health and wellbeing (Alshehri et al., 2021; Nishida et al., 2021).
Polyphenols, a diverse group of secondary metabolites abundant in various plant-derived foods and beverages, have garnered significant attention for their multifaceted bioactivities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer properties, among many others (Bolat et al., 2024). These bioactive metabolites exert their biological effects through some unambiguous mechanisms, including free radical scavenging action, modulation of cell signalling pathways, and enzyme activities (Joshi et al., 2020; Rudrapal et al., 2021). Of particular relevance to gut health, polyphenols possess the capacity to modulate gut microbiota composition and function through multiple mechanisms, including direct antimicrobial effects, prebiotic-like activities, and modulation of microbial enzymatic or signalling activities involved in polyphenol metabolism (Petersen and Mansell, 2025).
This comprehensive review aims to elucidate the complex interplay between gut microbiota and polyphenols, exploring their mechanistic interactions and implications in promoting or maintaining human health and protective functions against various pathological or disease conditions (Halliwell, 2024). The interaction between gut microbiota and dietary polyphenols holds significant implications for human health and diseases. Accumulated evidence suggests that polyphenol-rich diets or supplementation may exert beneficial effects on composition and function of gut microbiota, promoting the growth of commensal bacteria while inhibiting the proliferation of pathogenic species. Conversely, gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in the bioavailability and metabolism of polyphenols, contributing to the generation of bioactive metabolites with improved systemic effects on host physiology and metabolism (Cardona et al., 2013; Catalkaya et al., 2020; Mahdi et al., 2025). In the context of health and disease management, certain potential interventions that target gut microbiota include dietary modifications, dietary fibres, prebiotic formulations, dietary supplements which can help prevent and treat various gastrointestinal abnormalities and metabolic disorders (Ghanbari et al., 2024). Polyphenol-rich dietary interventions have been proposed as potential and adjunctive strategies to modulate gut microbiota composition and function, thereby ameliorating the risk of disease progression and promoting host health (Carding et al., 2015; Das and Nair, 2019; Hrncir, 2022; Schippa and Conte, 2014).
The objective of this review is to collate the interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota critically, as well as its impact on human health. This review emphasizes the mechanisms by which polyphenols are metabolized by gut microbiota, while exploring potential factors that limit the polyphenol’s effects, including bioavailability, metabolic factors, dietary content, and individual variability. Further, the review highlights how long-term consumption of polyphenols through diet and microbial adaptation affect the stability of gut microbiota and consequently health outcomes. This review integrates the current status of knowledge on polyphenol-gut microbiota interactions and in-depth scientific insights of mechanism of their biological effects in a variety of physiological or pathological disease conditions.
The search terms and keywords for the study selection were dietary polyphenols OR food polyphenols AND gut microbiota AND health outcomes AND bioavailability and metabolism AND polyphenol metabolites. The in vitro and in vivo (animal) studies along with pharmacological activity were used as further criteria for literature search. The search was carried out for last 15 years (2011–2025) of publications. Three independent reviewers (M.R., A.M.de O. and R.P.S.) conducted the literature search in the scientific databases and assessed/verified the eligibility of the studies based on the title and abstract. The inclusion criteria were (i) studies involving dietary or food polyphenols and their health outcomes, (ii) studies reported on bioavailability and metabolism of dietary polyphenols, (iii) studies performed in gut-microbiota-aided dietary polyphenol metabolites and their effects in vitro or in vivo models, (iv) interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiotas, and (v) studies published from 2011 to 2025 (15 years, both years included). The exclusion criteria were (i) studies involving dietary polyphenols, chemistry, their antioxidant effects and role in disease management, (ii) studies on systematic reviews, meta-analysis and case reports, (iii) studies involving other than animal or human models, (iv) papers published before 2011, and (v) published articles in a language different from English. The published records cited in the manuscript were identified from the database search (PubMed Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus) and other sources, considering inclusion and exclusion criteria.
2 Gut microbiota: functional roles, human health and disease management
The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem consisting of trillions of microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and archaea that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals (Chakraborti, 2015). Recent research has shown that the gut microbiota plays a critical role in maintaining human health and preventing the development of various diseases (Jain et al., 2024; Neveu, 2010; Zhang S et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2020) The gut microbiota is an essential component of the human body, and its role in maintaining human health has been the subject of extensive research in recent years. The gut microbiota can affect various physiological processes, including metabolism, immune function, and brain function, through several mechanisms such as fermentation of dietary substrates, production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Kaur and Gupta, 2014), regulation of the gut barrier function, enhancement of nutrient absorption/metabolism, and modulation of the immune system (Cardona et al., 2013). The gut microbiota can also produce various vitamins, such as vitamin K and B vitamins, that are essential for human health. Moreover, the gut microbiota can influence the development of the immune system, particularly during early life, and protect against pathogenic microorganisms. Recent research has also shown that dysbiotic alterations in gut microbial communities lead to the development of various diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (Zhang Y et al., 2024; Zuo and Ng, 2018), obesity (Ahmed et al., 2025; Anhê et al., 2015; Chakraborti, 2015), type 2 diabetes (Chang et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2020), colorectal cancer, and cardiovascular disease (Almeida et al., 2021; Mohsenzadeh et al., 2025; Novakovic et al., 2020; Zalila-Kolsi et al., 2025). The composition and dynamics of gut microbiota are subject to myriad influences, encompassing host genetics, environmental exposures, diet, lifestyle factors, and medical interventions (antibiotics usage) (Hasan and Yang, 2019). Therefore, maintaining a healthy gut microbiota is crucial for preventing the development of various diseases and promoting overall human health. Table 1 depicts functional roles of gut microbiota in maintaining human health and disease management.
The gut microbiota has been demonstrated to exert a significant influence on cognitive functions through the complex network known as the gut brain axis (Matiş et al., 2023a). The administration of specific probiotics referred to as psychobiotics has shown improvement in key neuropsychiatric manifestations such as hyperactivity aggression and concentration in paediatric populations with gastrointestinal disorders. This cognitive modulation is largely mediated by the microbiotas ability to regulate fundamental neurotransmitters for instance certain gut bacteria are involved in the synthesis of serotonin as a key regulator of mood and satiety and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) as a primary inhibitory neurotransmitter crucial for calming neural activity and managing stress. Furthermore, the microbiota helps modulate the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis thereby influencing cortisol levels and the body´s stress response which is intrinsically linked to cognitive performance and emotional regulation. Beyond neurotransmitter balance, gut microbes can produce neuroactive metabolites like short chain fatty acids which possess anti-inflammatory properties and can influence neurogenesis and blood brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Thus, the gut microbiota acts as a pivotal endocrine organ that communicates with the brain via neural immune and hormonal pathways ultimately shaping cognitive processes behaviour and overall mental health. The microbiome also plays a significant role in alleviating neuropsychiatric disorders. In experimental animals, probiotic treatment subdues anxiety, such as supplements included strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus reduced significantly neuropsychiatric illness (Matiş et al., 2023b).
3 Dietary polyphenols: sources and biological significance
Plant-based diet have health promoting effects that are largely attributed to their bioactive phytochemicals (Samtiya et al., 2021; Szabo et al., 2021). Polyphenols abundant in plant-based food are a diverse group of phytochemicals, which include flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans, stilbenes, catechins, and anthocyanins (Rudrapal and Chetia, 2016). Dietary polyphenols in particular have been implicated to play significant role in preventing various chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, inflammatory illness, and certain types of cancer, and infectious diseases (Gasmi et al., 2022; Samtiya et al., 2021). Polyphenols are found in a wide range of food plants, including vegetables, fruits, pulses, cereals, grains, nuts, herbs, spices, and teas (Rudrapal et al., 2022a).
Dietary polyphenols are a diverse group of metabolites that are widely distributed in plant-based foods (Manach et al., 2004; Rudrapal et al., 2024; Rudrapal et al., 2022b) and have been shown to have various biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, and anticancer properties (Rudrapal et al., 2021). They play a significant role in promoting and maintaining human health. Table 2 presents the sources and biological significance of some representative dietary polyphenols.
4 Dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota: interaction and impact on health
Polyphenols influence the dynamics of resident gut microbiota and a positive relationship between the two can promote human health and the prevention of diseases. Recent research suggest that dietary polyphenols can influence the gut microbiota composition and function, which may contribute to their health benefits (Rodriguez-Mateos et al., 2024; Selma and Tomás-Barberán, 2009; Tomás-Barberán et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022). Gut microbiota facilitate the cardioprotective (Anselmi et al., 2021), neuroprotective effects (Pan et al., 2021; Rudrapal et al., 2024), antidiabetic/antiobesity (Gowd et al., 2019), anticancer (Westfall et al., 2021), and antimicrobia (Rudrapal et al., 2022c) activities of these polyphenols by producing polyphenol metabolites which protect gut barrier integrity, mitigate cellular oxidative stress and serve protective functions against inflammations/immune reactions and associated cellular damages.
Polyphenols are high molecular weight aromatic metabolites comprising complicated chemical (bulky) structures which impedes their absorption in the intestine. Gut microbiota, however, breakdown these polyphenols into low molecular weight metabolites which can be readily absorbed in the intestine (Wang et al., 2022). Interaction of polyphenols with the gut microbiota thus play a significant role in the health benefits of these polyphenols as it aids their breakdown to useful and easily absorbable metabolites. The impact of dietary polyphenols on gut microbiota can vary depending on several factors such as the type and amount of polyphenol intake through food, the host’s genetic makeup, and the gut microbiota composition. However, during microbiome dysbiosis, interaction between polyphenols and microbiome may have substantial implications for prevention or protective functions against diseases including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), diabetes, obesity cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, infectious illness, and immune-inflammatory diseases (Vamanu and Rai, 2021).
4.1 Interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota
The interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota is a complex process that involves several mechanisms such as absorption, biotransformation, and metabolism. Polyphenols can interact with gut bacteria by binding to their cell membranes or extracellular matrix, which can influence bacteria’s growth and metabolism (Lacombe et al., 2013; Tao and Chen, 2019). Polyphenols can also undergo biotransformation in the gut by the gut microbiota, which can result in the production of metabolites that may have health promoting effects. Figure 1 depicts the interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota and resulting polyphenol metabolites and their impact on human health.
Figure 1. Interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota and resulting polyphenol metabolites and their impact on human health. This diagram illustrates the bidirectional relationship between the consumption of dietary polyphenols and the gut microbiota ecosystem. Dietary polyphenols (top panel) are metabolized by the gut microbiota, a process that modulates the composition of microbial communities. Specifically, there is a promotion of beneficial bacteria (such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) and an inhibition of potential pathobionts (such as Clostridium and Enterobacter). As a result of this interaction, various bioactive metabolites are generated (central panel), including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and trimethylamine. These metabolites, along with the polyphenols themselves and their microbial transformation products, exert systemic effects. They positively influence the function of key organs and systems (bottom panel), such as the liver, pancreas, brain, joints, lungs, and heart, contributing to protective health outcomes. Created with BioRender.
4.2 Bioavailability and metabolism of dietary polyphenols by gut microbiota
The bioavailability of dietary polyphenols can vary significantly due to factors such as the type and the number of polyphenols ingested through diet, the host’s genetic makeup, and the composition of the gut microbiota (Lippolis et al., 2023). Various types of polyphenols, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, and lignans, have diverse chemical structures with complex physicochemical properties such as water solubility, lipophilicity, etc., That affect their absorption and metabolism. Moreover, higher concentrations of ingested polyphenols may saturate the absorption mechanisms, leading to reduced bioavailability. Individual genetic differences also influence the enzymes involved in polyphenol metabolism, thereby affecting their bioavailability and biological effects (Del Rio and Crozier, 2013; Pasinetti et al., 2018). The diversity and composition of the gut microbiota are also key determinants in polyphenol’s bioavailability.
The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the bioavailability of dietary polyphenols by converting complex polyphenols into simpler metabolites that are more bioavailable and possess different biological activities. Due to the poor absorption in the upper gut, polyphenols enter into the colon, where they undergo microbial fermentation into bioactive metabolites (Bié et al., 2023). For instance, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a prominent polyphenol in green tea, has low bioavailability due to poor absorption in the small intestine. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota can convert EGCG into simpler phenolic acids such as 5-(3′,4′-dihydroxyphenyl)-gamma-valerolactone (M5) and 5-(3′-Hydroxyphenyl)-gamma-valerolactone (M4), which exhibit significant anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties (Marín and Lombó, 2015; Zhang S et al., 2024). Isoflavones, including genistein and daidzein present in soy products, beans and certain vegetables, are partially absorbed from the small intestine, with the daidzein being converted in the colon by gut bacteria to equol, a metabolite with potent estrogenic and anti-inflammatory properties (Wu and Liu, 2022). Some lignans, such as secoisolariciresinol diglucoside present in flaxseeds, sunflower seeds, sesame seeds, pumpkin seeds undergo conversion in the gut to enterolignans that include enterolactone and enterodiol, both of which exhibit high-spectrum health-promotional effects as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, hypolipidemic and antimicrobial agents (Senizza and Lucini, 2020). Following the intake of polyphenols in red wine (obtained from red grapes), gut microbiota convert flavan-3-ols into the bioactive metabolite 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, thus contributing to cardiovascular health (Cueva et al., 2017). Similarly, ellagitannins (berries and pomegranates) are poorly absorbed in the small intestine and reach the colon relatively intact, where they are metabolized by gut bacteria into bioactive products called urolithins, which exert potent anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities (Banc et al., 2023). Rastmanesh reported (Rastmanesh, 2011) that polyphenols with high bioavailability and promotion of the activity of certain gut microbiomes aid weight loss in obese individuals.
The metabolism of polyphenols by gut microbiota has profound implications for health and disease management. Research have identified several gut microbial species involved in polyphenol metabolism. Akkermansia muciniphila, for instance, metabolizes ellagic acid into urolithins, which possess anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is known for metabolizing flavonoids into anti-inflammatory metabolites that support gut health. Similarly, Bacteroides fragilis can convert complex polyphenols such as quercetin into simpler metabolites, bioavailable metabolites that enhance immune modulation (Mithul Aravind et al., 2021). Cardiovascular health, for example, benefits from metabolites like 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid derived from catechins (tea polyphenol), which improve vascular function and reduce oxidative stress. In cancer prevention, metabolites such as urolithins from ellagic acid and valerolactones from EGCG modulate cell proliferation and induce apoptosis, exhibiting strong anticancer properties (Pourová et al., 2018). Additionally, phenolic acids produced from quercetin and resveratrol offer potent anti-inflammatory effects, which are crucial in managing chronic inflammatory diseases (Catalkaya G. & Capanoglu, 2020). Resveratrol goes through metabolic processing in the colon towards dihydroresveratrol, which increases benign bacteria like Bacteroidetes and Lactobacillus, decreases pathogenic bacteria like Enterococcus faecalis, and eventually reduces inflammation via NF-κB signaling (Chaplin and Mercader, 2018). Similarly, anthocyanins (berries, grapes, radishes, red potatoes, cabbage) are poorly absorbed and mostly converted into phenolic acid, such as protocatechuic acid, due to gut microbiota, contributing to the growth of beneficial bacteria like Faecalibacterium and Lactobacillus (Kasprzak-Drozd et al., 2021). EGCG (green tea) is partly absorbed into the small intestine, whereas the rest gets metabolized by gut microbiota (Lactobacillus, Bacteroides) into various kinds of phenolic acids which in turn enhances bifidobacteria and inhibits pathogens like Clostridium difficile (Pérez-Burillo and Rufián-Henares, 2021).
The biotransformation of polyphenols can involve various microbial enzymes and pathways, such as esterases, glucuronidases, and ring-fission pathways (Makarewicz et al., 2021). A study with a symbiotic (a combination of probiotics and polyphenol-rich prebiotics) composed of a grape-derived prebiotic known as the Bioactive Dietary Polyphenol Preparation (BDPP) and a combination of the probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum and Bifidobacterium longum, is described to attenuate the chronic-stress induced inflammatory responses in the ileum and the prefrontal cortex (Westfall et al., 2021). Pharmacokinetic studies substantiate that the effect may be attributed to specific synbiotic-produced metabolites including gallic acid (GA), 4-hydroxycinnamic acid (4-HCA), homovanillic acid (HVA), 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (3-HPPA), 4-HPPA, 3-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (3-HPAA), the resveratrol microbial metabolite dihydroresveratrol (DHRSV), and the characteristic flavonoid microbial metabolite 5-(3′,4′-dihydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone (DHVL).
Polyphenols are metabolized in the gut through several biotransformation pathways, including hydrolysis, dehydroxylation, demethylation, and reduction, resulting in the production of metabolites with different biological activities (Stevens and Maier, 2016) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Metabolic pathways of selected polyphenols in the organism. This scheme details the primary biotransformation pathways of polyphenols, encompassing both human metabolism (conjugation phase) and intestinal microbial metabolism (breakdown phase). In the small intestine, human enzymes such as lactase phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) and cytosolic β-glucosidase hydrolyze complex polyphenols (conjugates, such as glycosides) into their simpler forms (aglycones). Subsequently, conjugation enzymes like UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT), sulfotransferases (SULT), and catechol-O-methyltransferases (COMT) in the liver and other tissues chemically modify these compounds to facilitate their excretion. In the large intestine, the gut microbiota plays a crucial role in metabolizing these compounds. The diagram exemplifies the transformation of specific polyphenols into bioactive phenolic acids: 1. Hesperetin-7-O-rutinoside (found in citrus) is converted to hesperetin and finally to ferulic acid (FA). 2. Rosmarinic acid (RA) is metabolized into caffeic acid (CAA) and then into FA. 3. Proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins) and flavan-3-ols are degraded to phenylacetic acid (PhA). These final phenolic acids are key metabolites, widely recognized for their beneficial health effects. Adapted, by permission (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License), from (Vladimir-Knežević et al., 2012). LPH, cytosobetaglucosidase, LPH, lactase phlorizin hydrolase, UDPGT, UDP glucuronosyl transferase, SULT, Phenol sulfotransferase, COMT, Cathechol-O-methyltransferase, FA, ferulic acid, RA, rosmarinic acid, CAA, caffeic acid, COA, m-coumaric acid, PhA, Phenylacetic acid.
The metabolism of polyphenols by the gut microbiota can also affect the composition and function of the gut microbiota itself. Gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the biotransformation of polyphenols as they can convert complex polyphenols into simple metabolites that are more bioavailable and have different biological activities. For instance, flavan-3-ols, which are abundant in tea, grapes, and cocoa (Van Dorsten et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2019), can be converted by the gut microbiota into phenolic acids and urolithins, which have been shown to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties (Tzounis et al., 2008). Similarly, quercetin, a flavonoid found in onions, apples, and berries, can be converted by the gut microbiota into isoflavones, which have been shown to have estrogen-like properties and may play a role in preventing osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases (Al-Ishaq et al., 2021). Polyphenols are present in plants in various forms, like aglycones (absorbed from the small intestine) and glycosides, esters or polymers (hydrolysed by intestinal enzymes) or by the colonic microflora. Glycosides can be hydrolysed through two possible ways: the first one involves the action of lactase phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) in the brush-border of the small intestine epithelial cells, so that the aglycone forms may then enter epithelial cells by passive diffusion due to increased lipophilicity. The second way involves cytosolic betaglucosidase (CBG) within the epithelial cells, that lead the polar glucosides to be transported through the active sodium-dependent glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1). SLGT1 is known not to transport flavonoids but the glycosylated flavonoids, and some aglycones, can inhibit the glucose transporter (Vladimir-Knežević et al., 2012).
The metabolism of polyphenols in the gut may be a complex process, involving the metabolic degradation of anthocyanins being better known than the others. The bacterial metabolism involves the cleavage of glycosidic linkages and breakdown of anthocyanidin heterocycle (from C-ring), and degradation into phloroglucinol derivatives (from A-ring) and benzoic acids (from B-ring) (Aura et al., 2005; Fernandes et al., 2015). O-demethylation is also described (Keppler, 2005). Figure 3 depicts biotransformation and metabolism of quercetin by gut microbiota. The figure shows how the process begins with two initial pathways: absorbtion via the sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT1), or hydrolyzation by bacterial or human hydrolases and β-glucosidases to release the active quercetin aglycone.
Figure 3. Biotransformation and metabolism of quercetin by gut microbiota. This figure illustrates the multi-step process by which the dietary flavonoid quercetin is processed within the human body, highlighting the essential role of the gut microbiota. The process begins with dietary sources of quercetin, often consumed in a glycosylated form (e.g., quercetin 3-O-β-glucopyranoside). In the small intestine, this compound can follow two initial pathways: 1) It can be directly absorbed via the sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT1), or 2) it can be hydrolyzed by bacterial or human hydrolases and β-glucosidases to release the active quercetin aglycone. Subsequently, the aglycone can be absorbed and undergo secondary metabolism in the liver, where it is modified through processes like O-methylation and dehydroxylation to form various metabolites. Simultaneously, the gut microbiota (including genera like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) plays a crucial role in further breaking down the quercetin aglycone and its metabolites through additional dehydroxylation and ring-fission reactions, producing simpler phenolic acids and other small molecules. These final quercetin-derived metabolites are then transported to various organs throughout the body, where they exert their localized biological effects and contribute to the observed health benefits associated with quercetin intake. Created with Biorender.
Once absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, quercetin is converted into a carbohydrate conjugate by gut microbiome bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. The conjugated form crosses the membrane with the help of a sodium-dependent glucose transporter, and subsequently undergoes secondary metabolism in the liver. The metabolites are then transported to the major organs of the human body (heart, kidneys, lungs, central nervous system), where they exert their effects.
Polyphenols with polymeric nature and high molecular weight like proanthocyanidins are poorly absorbed, which causes high concentrations in gastrointestinal tract lumen and have direct effects on the intestinal mucosa. This effect is especially important when the intestine is exposed to oxidizing agents or is affected by inflammation and diseases such as cancer. These metabolites are, therefore, carried to the colon where they undergo structural modifications, those absorbed in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract being metabolized in the liver and excreted in the bile or directly from the enterocyte back to the small intestine and reaching the colon but in a different form (e.g., glucuronide conjugates). The colonic microflora hydrolyses glycosides into aglycones and extensively metabolizes the aglycones into simpler metabolites, such as phenolic acids. However, conjugation and metabolism help to attenuate the potential toxic effects that accomplish polyphenols absorption. The main conjugation mechanisms include glucuronidation, sulfation andmethylationcatalyzed by UDP glucuronosyl transferase (UDPGT), phenol sulfotransferase (SULT) and catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) (Scalbert and Williamson, 2000).
4.3 Interrelationship among dietary polyphenols, gut microbiota and health implications
The consumption of dietary polyphenols has been associated with several health benefits, such as the prevention of chronic diseases including cancer (Karam et al., 2025; Y. Li et al., 2025; Tian et al., 2016; You et al., 2025), cardiovascular diseases (Alotaibi et al., 2021; Bhagani et al., 2020; Chen X et al., 2025; Chen Y. Y. et al., 2025; Liu Q et al., 2025; Mansour et al., 2024), metabolic disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases (Di Meo et al., 2020; Ross et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024). These health benefits may be mediated by the interaction between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota. Polyphenols can also modulate the gut microbiota metabolism by promoting the production of metabolites with different biological activities (Rodríguez-Daza et al., 2021). Polyphenols can modulate the gut microbiota composition by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus and inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria such as Clostridium and Enterobacter. Tea polyphenols including epicatechin inhibit the growth of Clostridium and Enterococci. Polyphenols can also modulate the gut microbiota function by altering the expression of microbial genes involved in various metabolic pathways, such as carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism (Anhê and Marette, 2017; Martín-Peláez and Fitó, 2017). For example, resveratrol, a polyphenol found in grapes and red wine, has been shown to promote the growth of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria (Qiao and Le, 2014) and inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli (Vestergaard and Ingmer, 2019). Resveratrol can also promote the production of SCFAs such as butyrate (Tain et al., 2021), which have been shown to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties. Likewise, dietary quercetin has been known to alter gut microbial composition because of its probiotic-like activity and promotion of certain bacteria. Similarly, chlorogenic acid assists in improving resistance against intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, and gut microflora disorder caused by infections of Clostridium perfringens type A and Salmonella pullorum (Rana et al., 2022; Zeng et al., 2022). Ellagitannins, for example, abundant in pomegranates and strawberries, can be converted by the gut microbiota into urolithins, which have been shown to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties (Bialonska et al., 2009). Urolithins can also promote the growth of beneficial bacteria such as Akkermansia muciniphila, which can protect against obesity and diabetes. In a recent study, a black tea and or a red wine grape extract (RWGE), both containing complex mixtures of dietary polyphenols have been investigated with the help of simulator of the intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME), an in vitro ecosystem of gut microbiota. Black tea stimulated Klebsiella and enterococci and reduced B. coccoides (bifidobacteria) and Victivallis. On the other hand, RWGE promoted the growth of Klebsiella, Cloacibacillus, and Victivallis, while it decreased B. coccoides (bifidobacteria), Anaeroglobus, and Bacteroides (Kemperman et al., 2013). Table 3 illustrates specific polyphenols, their metabolites and impact on human health.
4.4 Modulation of polyphenol-gut microbiota interaction
The mechanism of action of polyphenol-gut microbiota interaction is based on the mutual, bidirectional dynamic relationship between polyphenols and gut microbiota. These metabolites have been recognized in a wide sense to play a considerable role in shaping gut microbiota composition, selectively promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria like Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli, while inhibiting the growth of pathogenic species such as Clostridium and Enterobacteriaceae (Krishnamurthy et al., 2023). This kind of selective modulation favours healthier balance and improved microbial diversity. In turn, the gut microbiota metabolizes polyphenols into bioactive metabolites such as phenolic acids and urolithins, which eventually exerts systemic effects including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and cardioprotective actions. This interaction indirectly modulates host metabolic pathways through microbial metabolites by influencing gut barrier integrity, lipid metabolism, and glucose homeostasis (Sarubbo et al., 2023). The mechanisms involved in various health outcomes for gut-microbiota and polyphenol interactions is summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. Health outcome-based functions and mechanisms involved in gut-microbiota and polyphenol interactions.
There are some mechanistic relationships between polyphenols and gut microbiota that, nevertheless not completely understood, suggest a strict linkage underlying their metabolic functions. They exhibit a bidirectional interaction, throudh which gut microbiota metabolizes polyphenols into bioactive compounds (e.g., urolithins, equol), which then further modulate the microbial community (Corrêa et al., 2019), and a “duplibiotic” action, as polyphenols exhibit both prebiotic-like effects (stimulating beneficial bacteria) and antimicrobial effects (inhibiting pathogens) (Rodríguez-Daza et al., 2021).
Some interesting behaviors, but which are still in the field of emerging research, are strain-specific responses and host-dependent effects. Concerting the first one, selective bacterial promotion may occur, when specific polyphenol sources consistently promote distinct bacteria (e.g., pomegranate increases Lactobacillus; cocoa boosts Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) (Liu X et al., 2025). It may be mentioned that there are either metabolizing or opportunistic bacteria that act with these compounds. Some bacteria (e.g., Gordonibacter) directly metabolize polyphenols, while others (e.g., Akkermansia muciniphila) are “opportunistic,” thriving in the altered environment (Rodríguez-Daza et al., 2021). Taking into account the second emerging topic, it is worth to mention the interindividual variability and metabotypes: individuals are classified into metabotypes (e.g., equol producers vs. non-producers; urolithin metabotypes A, B, 0) based on their gut microbiota’s metabolic capacity (Liu X et al., 2025; Mahdi et al., 2025). There is also an influence of host genetics, when host gene polymorphisms (e.g., in enzymes for polyphenol conjugation) can affect an individual’s metabolic response to polyphenol intake (Scott et al., 2022b).
5 Limitations and future directions
During recent decades, polyphenols have gained considerable attention as naturally occurring plant metabolites that can modulate gut microbiota and contribute to health. However, how far and consistently these health benefits are realized is burdened by several limitations that lower their effectiveness.
Upon ingestion, only a small portion undergoes absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract, whereas most pass into the colon and are metabolized into bioactive metabolites by gut microbes. This microbial metabolism is highly individual-specific (genetic, age, life style, diet, environmental exposure, etc.) since it depends on the composition and functional capacity of an individual’s gut microbiota. Such factors influence significantly polyphenol’s bioavailability and metabolism by gut microbiota and hence resulting health outcomes.
Besides, polyphenols are consumed as part of complex foods, and their interactions with the food matrix can affect their bioavailability and functions. A common problem in studies involving natural products and their biological effects is the influence of matrix effects (such as fiber, fats, carbohydrates, and proteins) on this activity. Polyphenols can very often be found in the form of conjugates with carbohydrates, which is a way for the plant to fix these natural metabolites. An example of this is delphinidin, which occurs in vegetables such as black beans in the form of an O-glycoside (Kumari et al., 2025). The association with these carbohydrates has a positive effect on the absorption of polyphenols by the organism that consumes them, which otherwise do not exhibit good interaction with membranes. Other matrix components can positively or negatively affect the bioavailability of the compounds, such as fats, which facilitate their incorporation into mixed micelles, a necessary step for intestinal absorption (a positive effect), but can hinder their digestion and form eventual aggregates with mineral deposits, such as calcium ones (a negative effect). Fiber, on the other hand, can constitute a physical barrier between intestinal enzymes and nutrients present in food, which is undesirable, but it contributes as a substrate for gut microbes, producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that have systemic health benefits, including effects on glucose and lipid metabolism (Kamiloglu et al., 2021). Therefore, our approach to the study of polyphenols should include the role of the biological matrix, which is usually positive, exerting a synergism necessary for better absorption of these compounds. Consideration should be given to the form of administration, whether in the form of plant extracts, where these effects are more pronounced, or in the form of isolated polyphenol supplements, in which appropriate excipients are chosen to maximize absorption and biological effect.
Fermentation (enzymatic metabolic degradation) by gut bacteria may, for example, depend on dietary fiber. Again, fats can also alter the solubility and absorption of polyphenols. It is for this reason that the interactions involving polyphenols make it hard to predict either its way through the digestive system or how well it will affect gut microbiota. Furthermore, there is a yet incomplete understanding of long-term impact that intake of polyphenols can cause gut microbiota. Most of the microbes could counteract the antimicrobial aspects of certain polyphenolic metabolites responsible for disturbing its balance. Such adaptation would affect the health-related effects of very long-term consumption of polyphenols or it may lead to dysbiosis. The incompleteness of research makes our understanding of polyphenols’ influence on gut microbiota even more difficult.
The dose-response relationship is another factor that may affect the health outcome of polyphenols. Usually, polyphenols have dose-dependent effects, though the optimal dosage is difficult to ascertain. While high doses can sometimes exert toxic effects, such as damaging the gut barrier or inducing oxidative stress, low doses may not elicit a sufficient response to produce measurable benefits. Despite the evident health benefits of polyphenols, consideration should be given to determining the most appropriate dosages in order to avoid adverse problems. Regarding the conflict between antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity, appropriate dosages have the benefit of neutralizing harmful free radicals (ROS), protecting cellular components from oxidative damage (Rudrapal et al., 2022a). In high concentrations, however, polyphenols can generate oxidative stress and induce apoptosis; this pro-oxidant effect is investigated for selectively targeting damaged cells, like UVA-damaged keratinocytes, but its systemic impact is complex (Lecci et al., 2021). Concerning gut microbiota modulation, adequate dosages provide prebiotic behaviour, selectively promoting beneficial bacteria and increasing microbial diversity, leading to production of beneficial metabolites (Plamada and Vodnar, 2021). High dosages may disrupt microbial balance; excessive amounts can exert antimicrobial pressure, potentially reducing microbial richness. Interindividual variability in gut microbiota means the same dose can have different effects (Rossi et al., 2025; Scott et al., 2022b).
Endocrine and thyroid function of polyphenols are also susceptible to dosage issues. Phytoestrogens like genistein and daidzein may offer benefits for cardiovascular health and menopausal symptoms at low concentrations. Notwithstanding, polyphenols can act as endocrine disruptors; some polyphenols are phytoestrogens that may antagonize estrogen receptors at high doses, potentially disrupting reproductive health. Flavonoids like quercetin can also inhibit thyroid peroxidase, disrupting thyroid hormone synthesis (Quesada-Vázquez et al., 2024). After ingestion, polyphenols are metabolized by gut microbiota and liver into various bioactive metabolites. However, low native bioavailability means high oral doses are often needed to achieve efficacy, increasing the risk of gut-level adverse effects. The same metabolic processes can also produce inactive or potentially toxic metabolites.
Many polyphenols exhibit hormetic effects, meaning low doses induce beneficial, adaptive stress responses (e.g., mild oxidative stress that strengthens cellular defense systems), while high doses can cause damaging toxicity (Leri et al., 2020). Another relevant point is that the relationship between polyphenols and the gut microbiome is a two-way track: gut microbiota determines the bioavailability and bioactivity of the polyphenols consumed, transforming them into more absorbable and often more potent metabolites. In return, the polyphenols shape the composition and function of your microbial community. This symbiotic relationship is highly individual and is a key area for future “precision nutrition”. Besides, the health benefits observed from consuming whole, polyphenol-rich foods are likely due to the synergistic action of multiple compounds rather than a single, high-dose polyphenol. Hormetic and synergistic effects are described in the literature, for examples, with luteolin (Abbasi et al., 2014) and ferulic acid (Moghadam et al., 2018). This natural combination may provide a balanced effect that is difficult to replicate with isolated supplements.
There is a lack of standardization in experimental design, polyphenol sources, dosages, and forms-for example, extracts, purified metabolites, or whole foods-used, and also studied populations-human, animal, or in vitro models-lead to a lack of coherent results. In this context, dosing, formulation, and delivery of polyphenols need to be optimized and developed in order to achieve their optimal bioavailability and effective bio-functionality. In spite of these hurdles, polyphenols may still be considered one of the most promising areas in gut health research.
Some contradictions and knowledge gaps about polyphenols and their role on gut microbiota that as mentioned in the literature are the long-held hypothesis suggesting that obesity is linked to an increased firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio, and that polyphenols can reverse this, what is not a consensus (Corrêa et al., 2019). Besides, a significant knowledge gap exists in identifying the full repertoire of bacterial enzymes (PAZymes) involved in polyphenol metabolism and their regulation (Rodríguez-Daza et al., 2021). Furthermore, the ecological consequences of the “duplibiotic” effect is not fully elucidated. A weak understanding about how the correlations between polyphenol intake and microbial changes can be translated in a huge causality in human health outcomes is still challenging (Scott et al., 2022b).
Personalized nutrition approaches that consider individual microbiota profiles and dietary habits might overcome such limitations. Well-designed dose optimization studies with adequate methodological standardization might further show a precise role of polyphenols in gut microbiota modulation. Overcoming these limitations may realize the full therapeutic potential of polyphenols in maintaining gut health and disease management.
Future directions on the research must face precision nutrition and personalization, taking into account a person’s gut microbiota composition and metabotype in order to allow for tailored dietary recommendations with specific polyphenols to achieve desired health outcomes. Furthermore, closing the mechanistic knowledge gaps requires integrating multi-omics approaches (genomics, metabolomics, proteomics) with advanced computational modeling, that shall help identifying key bacterial strains, enzymes, and bioactive metabolites, moving from observational to predictive science (Liu X et al., 2025; Zeb et al., 2024).
While planning future research directions on exploring the relationship between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota, several important tasks should be pursued in order to go deep into the understanding of all its potential for achieving human health and protective against diseases. Among them, mechanistic insight concerning polyphenol-microbiota interactions is the of utmost importance. Several bioactive metabolites arising from polyphenols processed by gut microbes have gained attention due to their apparent health-related benefits; however, the microbial species driving these conversions and pathways are not yet well-characterized. The aim of future research should focus on the interactive mapping of polyphenolic intake and gut microbiome, pointing to important classes of bioactive metabolite production and further to oversee how such metabolites can then affect host cell pathways towards better intestinal and non-intestinal health and associated immune-inflammatory and other biological responses. Crosstalk understanding at the molecular level between polyphenols-gut microbiota and a host cell may lead scientists to identify new targets for curative therapies. The second, very important sector involves elaboration on personalized nutrition approach-the personal variations in the composition of gut microbiota contribute so much to modifying bioavailability, metabolism and the efficacy of polyphenols.
The use of animals in testing bioactive compounds has been the subject of some controversy over the years, not only due to ethical aspects, but also because of the limitations of mimicking the biological response (including toxicology) of a target organism based on results from another species with different physiology. For example, there is the difficulty in simulating the activity of compounds against neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s using interventional animal models (Zeiss, 2015). In this context, alternatives such as mechanistic animal models have emerged. The most common mechanistic models are: animal growth models (AGM), which detail energy and mass balance to predict individual growth based on supply and metabolic costs; animal migration models (AMM), which combine behavioral elements like foraging, flight, and fuel use to explain migration patterns; and metabolic models (MM), which integrate high-throughput data to understand metabolism in microbial communities and pathogens, and to identify drug targets. Despite the usefulness of the approach, some drawbacks must be considered (Hartung, 2024): animal models often fail to predict drug efficacy and safety in humans, leading to false negatives (abandoning potentially good drugs) and false positives (drugs that work in animals but fail in humans). Several factors limit the accuracy of animal models, including biological differences, artificial experimental conditions, and study design limitations. Adverse events in humans are sometimes missed by animal testing. It is necessary to supplement animal research with more reliable human-based techniques like organs-on-chips, computer models, and big data analysis.
6 Conclusion
In conclusion, the interplay between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota represents a multifaceted nexus with far-reaching implications for human health and diseases. This review summarized a comprehensive understanding the topic, overseeing the mechanistic underpinnings of gut microbiota-polyphenol interactions and their implications in maintaining human health and disease management with future research scopes and directions within the purview of rigorous scientific inquiry. Understanding the complex interactions between dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism is essential for developing targeted dietary interventions and functional foods aimed at enhancing health and preventing development of various diseases. Several such interventions targeting the gut microbiota milieu through strategic dietary manipulations, probiotic formulations and prebiotic supplements hold considerable promise in promoting health and amelioration of diverse disease conditions. However, more research would further help elucidate the exact molecular mechanisms of polyphenol-gut microbiota interactions and the physiological effects of microbiota-derived polyphenol metabolites on human health. Understanding such intricate biological interactions between gut-microbiota and polyphenols can unfold the potential of polyphenol-rich diets in influencing human health and disease outcomes.
Author contributions
MR: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. AO: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. RS: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abbasi, N., Akhavan, M. M., Rahbar-Roshandel, N., and Shafiei, M. (2014). The effects of low and high concentrations of luteolin on cultured human endothelial cells under normal and glucotoxic conditions: involvement of integrin-linked kinase and cyclooxygenase-2. Phytotherapy Res. 28 (9), 1301–1307. doi:10.1002/PTR.5128;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL
Abdulkhaleq, L. A., Assi, M. A., Noor, M. H. M., Abdullah, R., Saad, M. Z., and Taufiq-Yap, Y. H. (2017). Therapeutic uses of epicatechin in diabetes and cancer. Veterinary World 10 (8), 869–872. doi:10.14202/VETWORLD.2017.869-872
Adeeb, S., Salman, U. I., Ebtesam, A. A.-S., and Young-sup, L. (2018). Pleiotropic effects of bioactive phytochemicals(polyphenols and terpenes). Funct. Foods, Nutraceuticals Nat. Prod. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325847435.
Agraharam, G., Girigoswami, A., and Girigoswami, K. (2022). Myricetin: a multifunctional flavonol in biomedicine. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 8 (1), 48–61. doi:10.1007/S40495-021-00269-2
Ahmad, S., Ahsan, F., Ansari, J. A., Mahmood, T., Bano, S., and Shahanawaz, M. (2024). Bioflavonoid daidzein: therapeutic insights, formulation advances, and future directions. Drug Res. 74 (9), 433–455. doi:10.1055/A-2379-6849/ID/RDR-2024-06-3045-0040/BIB
Ahmed, F., Arshad, M. T., Maqsood, S., Ikram, A., and Gnedeka, K. T. (2025). Gut-brain axis in obesity: how dietary patterns influence psychological well-being and metabolic health? Food Sci. and Nutr. 13 (7), e70689. doi:10.1002/FSN3.70689
Al-Ishaq, R. K., Liskova, A., Kubatka, P., and Büsselberg, D. (2021). Enzymatic metabolism of flavonoids by gut microbiota and its impact on gastrointestinal cancer Cancers 13 (16), 3934. doi:10.3390/cancers13163934
Alfaddagh, A., Martin, S. S., Leucker, T. M., Michos, E. D., Blaha, M. J., Lowenstein, C. J., et al. (2020). Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 4. doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100130
Almeida, C., Barata, P., and Fernandes, R. (2021). The influence of gut microbiota in cardiovascular Diseases—A brief review. Porto Biomed. J. 6 (1), e106. doi:10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000106
Alotaibi, B. S., Ijaz, M., Buabeid, M., Kharaba, Z. J., Yaseen, H. S., and Murtaza, G. (2021). Therapeutic effects and safe uses of plant-derived polyphenolic compounds in cardiovascular diseases: a review. Drug Des. Devl. Ther. 4713–4732. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S327238
Alshatwi, A. A., Ramesh, E., Periasamy, V. S., and Subash-Babu, P. (2013). The apoptotic effect of hesperetin on human cervical cancer cells is mediated through cell cycle arrest, death receptor, and mitochondrial pathways. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 27 (6), 581–592. doi:10.1111/J.1472-8206.2012.01061.X
Alshehri, D., Saadah, O., Mosli, M., Edris, S., Alhindi, R., and Bahieldin, A. (2021). Dysbiosis of gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: current therapies and potential for microbiota-modulating therapeutic approaches. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 21, 270–283. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2020.5016
Anhê, F. F., Varin, T. V., Le Barz, M., Desjardins, Y., Levy, E., Roy, D. M. A., et al. (2015). Gut microbiota dysbiosis in obesity-linked metabolic diseases and prebiotic potential of polyphenol-rich extracts. Curr. Obes. Rep. 4, 389–400. doi:10.1007/s13679-015-0172-9
Anhê, F. F. V. T. V. S. J. D., Marette, A., and Schertzer, J. D. (2017). The gut microbiota as a mediator of metabolic benefits after bariatric surgery. Can. J. Diabetes 41, 439–447. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.02.002
Anselmi, G., Gagliardi, L., Egidi, G., Leone, S., Gasbarrini, A., Miggiano, G. A. D., et al. (2021). Gut microbiota and cardiovascular diseases: a critical review. Cardiol. Rev. 29 (4), 195–204. doi:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000327
Aras, A. B., Guven, M., Akman, T., Ozkan, A., Sen, H. M., Duz, U., et al. (2015). Neuroprotective effects of daidzein on focal cerebral ischemia injury in rats. Neural Regen. Res. 10 (1), 146–152. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.150724
Aura, A. M., Martin-Lopez, P., O’Leary, K. A., Williamson, G., Oksman-Caldentey, K. M., Poutanen, K., et al. (2005). In vitro metabolism of anthocyanins by human gut microflora. Eur. J. Nutr. 44 (3), 133–142. doi:10.1007/S00394-004-0502-2
Azam, S., Hadi, N., Khan, N. U., and Hadi, S. M. (2004). Prooxidant property of green tea polyphenols epicatechin and epigallocatechin-3-gallate: implications for anticancer properties. Toxicol. Vitro 18 (5), 555–561. doi:10.1016/J.TIV.2003.12.012
Babaei, P. (2019). “In silico analysis of microbial communities through constraint-based metabolic modelling: investigation of the human gut microbiota and bacterial consortia,” in Food fermentation.
Babu, I., Valsan, C., Ardra, M., and Paul, J. (2024). Incidence of Clostridium difficile in patients with antibiotic associated diarrhea.
Bahena-Román, M., Gutiérrez-Pérez, I. A., Orbe-Orihuela, Y. C., Díaz-Benítez, C. E., Lagunas-Martínez, A., Ayala-García, J. C., et al. (2022). Low abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila and low consumption of polyphenols associated with metabolic disorders in child population. Hum. Nutr. Metabolism 30, 200167. doi:10.1016/j.hnm.2022.200167
Balázs, O., D, Á. Z. B. Z. H. C. V. K. V. R. G., and Poór, M. (2023). “Inhibition of xanthine oxidase-catalyzed xanthine and 6-mercaptopurine oxidation by luteolin,” in Naringenin, myricetin, ampelopsin and their conjugated metabolites.
Banc, R., Rusu, M. E., Filip, L., and Popa, D. S. (2023). The impact of ellagitannins and their metabolites through gut microbiome on the gut health and brain wellness within the gut-brain axis. Foods 12 (2), 270. doi:10.3390/foods12020270
Bhagani, H., Nasser, S. A., Dakroub, A., El-Yazbi, A. F., Eid, A. A., Kobeissy, F., et al. (2020). The mitochondria: a target of polyphenols in the treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (14), 4962. doi:10.3390/IJMS21144962
Bialonska, D., Kasimsetty, S. G., Schrader, K. K., and Ferreira, D. (2009). The effect of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) byproducts and ellagitannins on the growth of human gut bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (18), 8344–8349. doi:10.1021/JF901931B
Bié, J., Sepodes, B., Fernandes, P. C., and Ribeiro, M. H. (2023). Polyphenols in health and disease: gut microbiota, bioaccessibility, and bioavailability. Compounds. 3 (1), 40–72. doi:10.3390/compounds3010005
Blaut, M. (2015). Gut microbiota and energy balance: role in obesity. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 74, 227–234. doi:10.1017/S0029665114001700
Bolat, E., Sarıtaş, S., Duman, H., Eker, F., Akdaşçi, E., Karav, S., et al. (2024). Polyphenols: secondary metabolites with a biological impression. Nutrients 16 (15), 2550. doi:10.3390/NU16152550
Bondonno, N. P., Bondonno, C. P., Hodgson, J. M., Ward, N. C., and Croft, K. D. (2015). The efficacy of quercetin in cardiovascular health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 4 (Issue 4), 290–303. doi:10.1007/s13668-015-0137-3
Buonomo, E. L., and Petri, J. , W. A. (2016). The microbiota and immune response during Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 41, 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.05.009
Cai, J., Rimal, B., Jiang, C., and Chiang, J. Y. L. (2022). “Bile acid metabolism and signaling,” in The microbiota, and metabolic disease.
Cai, J., Wen, H., Zhou, H., Zhang, D., Lan, D., Liu, S., et al. (2023). Naringenin: a flavanone with anti-inflammatory and anti-infective properties. Biomed. Pharmacother. 164, 114990. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114990
Calderón-Parra, J., Santiago, A., and Díaz, A. C. (2022). Enterococcal infections. Med. (Spain) 13 (50). doi:10.1016/j.med.2022.02.020
Cao, R., Bai, L., Ji, N., Gao, Y., Chen, Y., and Hua, E. (2011). Synthesis and biological evaluation of resveratrol analogues as anti-bacterial agents. ITME 2011 - Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Symposium IT Med. Educ. 1, 449–452. doi:10.1109/ITIME.2011.6130873
Carabotti, M. S. A. M. M. A., Severi, C., and Maselli, M. A. (2015). The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann. Gastroenterol. 28, 203–209.
Carding, S., Verbeke, K., Vipond, D. T., Corfe, B. M., and Owen, L. J. (2015). Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 26, 26191. doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.26191
Cardona, F., Andrés-Lacueva, C., Tulipani, S., Tinahones, F. J. Q.-O. M., and Queipo-Ortuño, M. I. (2013). Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 24, 1415–1422. doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.05.001
Catalkaya, G. V. K. L. L. R. G. D. D. D. M., and Capanoglu, E. (2020). “Interaction of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota: microbial metabolism of polyphenols, influence on the gut microbiota,” in And implications on host health.
Catalkaya, G., Venema, K., Lucini, L., Rocchetti, G., Delmas, D., Daglia, M., et al. (2020). Interaction of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota: microbial metabolism of polyphenols, influence on the gut microbiota, and implications on host health. Food Front. 1 (Issue 2), 109–133. doi:10.1002/fft2.25
Chakraborti, C. K. (2015). New-found link between microbiota and obesity. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 6 (4), 110–119. doi:10.4291/WJGP.V6.I4.110
Chang, C., Zhang, L., Miao, Y., Fang, B., and Yang, Z. (2020). Anticancer and apoptotic-inducing effects of rutin-chitosan nanoconjugates in triple negative breast cancer cells. J. Clust. Sci. 2020 32 (2), 331–340. doi:10.1007/S10876-020-01792-W
Chang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, F., Liang, J., Li, Y., and Tian, M. (2025). Sitagliptin ameliorates microbial dysbiosis and enhances gut barrier integrity in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1655522. doi:10.3389/FMICB.2025.1655522/BIBTEX
Chaplin, A. C. C., and Mercader, J. (2018). Resveratrol, metabolic syndrome, and gut microbiota. Nutrients 10, 1651. doi:10.3390/nu10111651
Chen, Y. J., Kong, L., Tang, Z. Z., Zhang, Y. M., Liu, Y., Wang, T. Y., et al. (2019). Hesperetin ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in rats by activating Nrf2/ARE/glyoxalase 1 pathway. Biomed. and Pharmacother. 111, 1166–1175. doi:10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2019.01.030
Chen, X., Song, X., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Jia, R., et al. (2022). Insights into the anti-inflammatory and antiviral mechanisms of resveratrol. Mediat. Inflamm. 2022, 7138756. doi:10.1155/2022/7138756
Chen X, X., Yang, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, Q., Xue, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025). Research progress and prospects of flavonoids in the treatment of hyperlipidemia: a narrative review. Molecules 30 (15), 3103. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES30153103
Chen Y. Y, Y. Y., Guo, J., Xue, S. L., Ding, L. L., Wei, B. Y., and Wen, S. Y. (2025). Uncovering the anti-atherosclerotic effect of isoquercitrin via microbiome metabolic modulation and network pharmacology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 73 (37), 23469–23485. doi:10.1021/ACS.JAFC.5C09903
Cho, J. Y., Kim, I. S., Jang, Y. H., Kim, A. R., and Lee, S. R. (2006). Protective effect of quercetin, a natural flavonoid against neuronal damage after transient global cerebral ischemia. Neurosci. Lett. 404 (3), 330–335. doi:10.1016/J.NEULET.2006.06.010
Cho, C. E., Taesuwan, S., Malysheva, O. V., Bender, E., Tulchinsky, N. F., Yan, J., et al. (2017). Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) response to animal source foods varies among healthy young men and is influenced by their gut microbiota composition: a randomized controlled trial. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61, 1600324. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201600324
Choi, H. L. D., and Mook-Jung, I. (2022). Gut microbiota as a hidden player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 86, 1501–1526. doi:10.3233/JAD-215235
Choi, J., Lee, D. H., Jang, H., Park, S. Y., and Seol, J. W. (2020). Naringenin exerts anticancer effects by inducing tumor cell death and inhibiting angiogenesis in malignant melanoma. Int. J. Med. Sci. 17 (18), 3049–3057. doi:10.7150/ijms.44804
Corrêa, T. A. F., Rogero, M. M., Hassimotto, N. M. A., and Lajolo, F. M. (2019). The two-way polyphenols-microbiota interactions and their effects on obesity and related metabolic diseases. Front. Nutr. 6, 485842. doi:10.3389/FNUT.2019.00188/BIBTEX
Cueva, C., Gil-Sánchez, I., Ayuda-Durán, B., González-Manzano, S., González-Paramás, A. M., Santos-Buelga, C., et al. (2017). An integrated view of the effects of wine polyphenols and their relevant metabolites on gut and host health. Molecules 22 (Issue 1), 99. doi:10.3390/molecules22010099
Dabeek, W. M., Marra, M. V., Dabeek, W. M., and Marra, M. V. (2019). Dietary quercetin and kaempferol: bioavailability and potential cardiovascular-related bioactivity in humans. Nutrients 11 (10), 11. doi:10.3390/NU11102288
Das, B., and Nair, G. B. (2019). Homeostasis and dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in health and disease. J. Biosci. 44, 117. doi:10.1007/s12038-019-9926-y
Del Rio, D. R.-M. A. S. J. P. T. M. B. G., Crozier, A., Spencer, J. P. E., Tognolini, M., and Borges, G. (2013). Dietary (poly) phenolics in human health: structures, bioavailability, and evidence of protective effects against chronic diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 18, 1818–1892. doi:10.1089/ars.2012.4581
Di Meo, F., Valentino, A., Petillo, O., Peluso, G., Filosa, S., and Crispi, S. (2020). Bioactive polyphenols and neuromodulation: molecular mechanisms in neurodegeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (7), 2564. doi:10.3390/IJMS21072564
Di Vincenzo, F., Del Gaudio, A., Petito, V., Lopetuso Lr, S. F., and Scaldaferri, F. (2024). Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 19, 275–293. doi:10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w
Dicks, L. M. (2022). Gut bacteria and neurotransmitters. Microorganisms 10, 1838. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10091838
Dinetz, E., Zeballos-Palacios, C., and Martinez, C. A. (2024). Addressing the missing links in cardiovascular aging. Clin. Interven. Aging, 873–882. doi:10.2147/CIA.S457180
Diwan, V. B. L., and Gobe, G. C. (2017). The flavonoid rutin improves kidney and heart structure and function in an adenine-induced rat model of chronic kidney disease. J. Funct. Foods 33, 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2017.03.012
Do, G. M., Jung, U. J., Park, H. J., Kwon, E. Y., Jeon, S. M., Mcgregor, R. A., et al. (2012). Resveratrol ameliorates diabetes-related metabolic changes via activation of AMP-Activated protein kinase and its downstream targets in Db/db mice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 56 (8), 1282–1291. doi:10.1002/MNFR.201200067
Dong, X., and Huang, R. (2022). Ferulic acid: an extraordinarily neuroprotective phenolic acid with anti-depressive properties. Phytomedicine 105, 154355. doi:10.1016/J.PHYMED.2022.154355
Dower, J., and Hollman, P. C. H. (2015). Effects of the pure flavonoids epicatechin and quercetin on vascular function and cardiometabolic health: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled.
Drăgan, M., Stan, C. D., Mircea, C., Cioancă, O., Dragostin, O., Iacob, A. T., et al. (2018). Ferulic acid – a versatile molecule. Acta Biol. Marisiensis 1, 53–60. doi:10.2478/abmj-2018-0013
Edwards, R. L., Lyon, T., Litwin, S. E., Rabovsky, A., Symons, J. D., and Jalili, T. (2007). Quercetin reduces blood pressure in hypertensive Subjects1. J. Nutr. 137 (11), 2405–2411. doi:10.1093/JN/137.11.2405
Elbarbry, F., Jones, G., and Ung, A. (2022). Catechin reduces blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats through modulation of arachidonic acid metabolism. Molecules 27 (23), 8432. doi:10.3390/molecules27238432
Fakharian, F., Thirugnanam, S., Welsh, D. A., Kim, W. K., Rappaport, J., Bittinger, K. R. N., et al. (2023). The role of gut dysbiosis in the loss of intestinal immune cell functions and viral pathogenesis. Microorganisms 11, 1849. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11071849
Fasano, A. (2020). All disease begins in the (leaky) gut: role of zonulin-mediated gut permeability in the pathogenesis of some chronic inflammatory diseases. F1000Res. 9. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20510.1
Fernandes, A. A. H., Novelli, E. L. B., Okoshi, K., Okoshi, M. P., Muzio, B. P.Di, Guimarães, J. F. C., et al. (2010). Influence of rutin treatment on biochemical alterations in experimental diabetes. Biomed. and Pharmacother. 64 (3), 214–219. doi:10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2009.08.007
Fernandes, I., de F. V. C. C., F. A., Mateus, N., and Calhau, C. (2015). Multiple-approach studies to assess anthocyanin bioavailability. Phytochem. Rev. 14, 899–919. doi:10.1007/s11101-015-9415-3
Fetissov, S. O. (2017). Role of the gut microbiota in host appetite control: bacterial growth to animal feeding behaviour. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 13, 11–25. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.150
Gao, J., Yu, H., Guo, W., Kong, Y., Gu, L., Li, Q., et al. (2018). The anticancer effects of ferulic acid is associated with induction of cell cycle arrest and autophagy in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 18 (1), 102. doi:10.1186/S12935-018-0595-Y
Gasmi, A., Mujawdiya, P. K., Noor, S., Lysiuk, R., Darmohray, R., Piscopo, S., et al. (2022). Polyphenols in metabolic diseases. Molecules 27 (19), 6280. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES27196280
Ghanbari, F., Hasani, S., and Aghili, Z. S. (2024). Potential preventive effect probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics cardiovascular risk factors through modulation gut microbiota. Food Sci. Nutri. 27 (7), 4569–4580. doi:10.1002/fsn3.4142
Ghoshal, U., Shukla, R., Srivastava, D., and Ghoshal, U. C. (2016). Irritable bowel syndrome, particularly the constipation-predominant form, involves an increase in Methanobrevibacter smithii, which is associated with higher methane production. Gut Liver 10 (6), 932–938. doi:10.5009/gnl15588
Gowd, V., Bao, T., and Chen, W. (2019). Antioxidant potential and phenolic profile of blackberry anthocyanin extract followed by human gut microbiota fermentation. Food Res. Int. 120, 523–533. doi:10.1016/J.FOODRES.2018.11.001
Goyal, A., Dubey, N., Raghav, J., and Agrawal, A. (2022). Naringenin: a prospective therapeutic agent for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. J. Food Biochem. 46, e14415. doi:10.1111/jfbc.14415
Gupta, A., Kumar, R., Pandey, A. K., Singh, A. K., and Rana, H. K. (2021). Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective activities of Terminalia bellirica and its bioactive component ellagic acid against diclofenac induced oxidative stress and hepatotoxicity. Toxicol. Rep. 8, 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.12.010
Gupta, N., Sharma, V., Kumar, M., Guarve, K., and Dhanawat, M. (2023). Therapeutic potential of genistein and its derivatives as a target for anticancer agents. ChemistrySelect 8, e202204924. doi:10.1002/slct.202204924
Halliwell, B. (2024). Understanding mechanisms of antioxidant action in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25 (1), 13–33. doi:10.1038/S41580-023-00645-4
Hansen, R., Russell, R. K., Reiff, C., Louis, P., McIntosh, F., Berry, S. H., et al. (2012). Microbiota of de-novo pediatric IBD: increased Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and reduced bacterial diversity in Crohn’s but not in ulcerative colitis. Am. J. Gastroenterology 107 (12), 1913–1922. doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.335
Hartogh, D. J. D., and Tsiani, E. (2019). Antidiabetic properties of naringenin: a citrus fruit polyphenol. Biomolecules 9, 99. doi:10.3390/biom9030099
Hartung, T. (2024). The (misleading) role of animal models in drug development. Front. Drug Discov. 4, 1355044. doi:10.3389/FDDSV.2024.1355044/BIBTEX
Hasan, N., and Yang, H. (2019). “Factors affecting the composition of the gut microbiota,” in And its modulation.
He, S., Wang, X., Zhong, Y., Tang, L., Zhang, Y., Ling, Y., et al. (2017). Hesperetin post-treatment prevents rat cardiomyocytes from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in vitro via activating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Biomed. and Pharmacother. 91, 1106–1112. doi:10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2017.05.003
Hirai, I., Okuno, M., Katsuma, R., Arita, N., Tachibana, M., and Yamamoto, Y. (2010). Characterisation of anti-staphylococcus aureus activity of quercetin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 45 (6), 1250–1254. doi:10.1111/J.1365-2621.2010.02267.X
Hou, Y., Wang, K., Wan, W., Cheng, Y., Pu, X., and Ye, X. (2018). Resveratrol provides neuroprotection by regulating the JAK2/STAT3/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway after stroke in rats. Genes and Dis. 5 (3), 245–255. doi:10.1016/J.GENDIS.2018.06.001
Hrncir, T. (2022). Gut microbiota dysbiosis: triggers, consequences, diagnostic and therapeutic options. Microorganisms 10, 578. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030578
Iacopini, P., Baldi, M., Storchi, P., and Sebastiani, L. (2008). Catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, rutin and resveratrol in red grape: content, in vitro antioxidant activity and interactions. J. Food Compos. Analysis 21 (8), 589–598. doi:10.1016/J.JFCA.2008.03.011
Imran, M., Saeed, F., Hussain, G., Imran, A., Mehmood, Z., Gondal, T. A., et al. (2021). Myricetin: a comprehensive review on its biological potentials. Food Sci. Nutr. 9 (10), 5854–5868. doi:10.1002/FSN3.2513;SUBPAGE:STRING:FULL
Iranshahi, M., Rezaee, R., Parhiz, H., Roohbakhsh, A., and Soltani, F. (2015). Protective effects of flavonoids against microbes and toxins: the cases of hesperidin and hesperetin. Life Sci. 137, 125–132. doi:10.1016/J.LFS.2015.07.014
Jain, H., Marsool, M. D. M., Goyal, A., Sulaiman, S. A., Fatima, L., Idrees, M., et al. (2024). Unveiling the relationship between gut microbiota and heart failure: recent understandings and insights. Curr. Problems Cardiol. 49 (1), 102179. doi:10.1016/J.CPCARDIOL.2023.102179
Jang, H. H., Noh, H., Kim, H. W., Cho, S. Y., Kim, H. J., Lee, S. H., et al. (2020). Metabolic tracking of isoflavones in soybean products and biosamples from healthy adults after fermented soybean consumption. Food Chem. 330, 127317. doi:10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2020.127317
Jiang, L., Shang, M., Yu, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhou, Y., et al. (2022). A high-fiber diet synergizes with Prevotella copri and exacerbates rheumatoid arthritis. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 19 (12), 1414–1424. doi:10.1038/s41423-022-00934-6
Joshi, D. C., Zhang, K., Wang, C., Chandora, R., Khurshid, V., Li, J., et al. (2020). Strategic enhancement of genetic gain for nutraceutical development in buckwheat: a genomics-driven perspective. Biotechnol. Adv. 39, 107479. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107479
Jyoti, , and Dey, P. (2025). Mechanisms and implications of the gut microbial modulation of intestinal metabolic processes. Npj Metabolic Health Dis. 2025 3 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1038/S44324-025-00066-1
Kamiloglu, S., Tomas, M., Ozdal, T., and Capanoglu, E. (2021). Effect of food matrix on the content and bioavailability of flavonoids. Trends Food Sci. and Technol. 117, 15–33. doi:10.1016/J.TIFS.2020.10.030
Kapcum, N., Uriyapongson, J., Alli, I., and Phimphilai, S. (2016). Anthocyanins, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities in colored corn cob and colored rice bran. Int. Food Res. J. 23 (6), 2347.
Karam, F., El Deghel, Y., Iratni, R., Dakroub, A. H., and Eid, A. H. (2025). The gut microbiome and colorectal cancer: an integrative review of the underlying mechanisms. Cell Biochem. Biophysics 83 (3), 2637–2650. doi:10.1007/S12013-025-01683-9
Kasprzak-Drozd, K., Oniszczuk, T., Stasiak, M., and Oniszczuk, A. (2021). Beneficial effects of phenolic compounds on gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (Issue 7), 3715. doi:10.3390/ijms22073715
Kato, S., Sato, T., Fujita, H., Kawatani, M. Y. Y., and Yamada, Y. (2021). Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonist on changes in the gut bacterium and the underlying mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 11, 9167. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88612-x
Kaur, N., and Gupta, A. K. (2014). Essential fatty acids as functional metabolites of foods-a review.
Kemperman, R. A., Gross, G., Vaughan, E. E., Possemiers, S., Marzorati, M., Van de Wiele, T., et al. (2013). Impact of polyphenols from Black tea and red wine/grape juice on a gut model microbiome. Food Res. Int. 53, 659–669. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.01.034
Keppler, K. H. H. U., and Humpf, H. U. (2005). Metabolism of anthocyanins and their phenolic degradation products by the intestinal microflora. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13, 5195–5205. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.003
Kleiman, S. C., Watson, H. J., Bulik-Sullivan, E. C., Huh, E. Y., Tarantino, L. M., Bulik, C. M., et al. (2015). The intestinal microbiota in acute anorexia nervosa and during renourishment: relationship to depression, anxiety, and eating disorder psychopathology. Biopsychosoc. Sci. Med. 77 (9), 969–981. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000247
Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. B. F., and Bäckhed, F. (2016). From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 165, 1332–1345. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041
Kostic, A. (2018). Metagenomic and functional analysis of athletes identify an exercise-promoting microbiome. Diabetes 67 (Suppl. ment_1). doi:10.2337/db18-2251-pub
Kriaa, A., Bourgin, M., Potiron, A., Mkaouar, H., Jablaoui, A., Gérard, P., et al. (2019). Microbial impact on cholesterol and bile acid metabolism: current status and future prospects. J. Lipid Res. 60 (2), 323–332. doi:10.1194/JLR.R088989
Krishnamurthy, H. K., Pereira, M., Bosco, J., George, J., Jayaraman, V., Krishna, K., et al. (2023). Gut commensals and their metabolites in health and disease. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1244293. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1244293
Kumari, P., Ambasta, A., Kumar, P., -, S., Kumar, A., and Tripathi, G. (2025). Flavonoids and their conjugates: potential molecules for therapeutics. Curr. Org. Chem. 30. doi:10.2174/0113852728381361250820054106/CITE/REFWORKS
Lacombe, A., Li, R. W., Klimis-Zacas, D., Kristo, A. S., Tadepalli, S., Krauss, E., et al. (2013). Lowbush wild blueberries have the potential to modify gut microbiota and xenobiotic metabolism in the rat Colon. PLOS ONE 8 (6), e67497. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0067497
Laddha, A. P., and Kulkarni, Y. A. (2021). Daidzein ameliorates diabetic retinopathy in experimental animals. Life Sci. 265, 118779. doi:10.1016/J.LFS.2020.118779
Lecci, R. M., D’antuono, I., Cardinali, A., Garbetta, A., Linsalata, V., Logrieco, A. F., et al. (2021). Antioxidant and pro-oxidant capacities as mechanisms of photoprotection of olive polyphenols on UVA-damaged human keratinocytes. Molecules 26 (8), 2153. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES26082153
Leri, M., Scuto, M., Ontario, M. L., Calabrese, V., Calabrese, E. J., Bucciantini, M., et al. (2020). Healthy effects of plant polyphenols: molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (4), 1250. doi:10.3390/IJMS21041250
Li, M., Jiang, Y., Jing, W., Sun, B., Miao, C., and Ren, L. (2013). Quercetin provides greater cardioprotective effect than its glycoside derivative rutin on isoproterenol-induced cardiac fibrosis in the rat. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 91 (11), 951–959. doi:10.1139/CJPP-2012-0432
Li, D., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, R., and Xia, M. (2015). Purified anthocyanin supplementation reduces dyslipidemia, enhances antioxidant capacity, and prevents insulin resistance in diabetic patients. J. Nutr. 145 (4), 742–748. doi:10.3945/JN.114.205674
Li, X., Wu, J., Xu, F., Chu, C., Li, X., Shi, X., et al. (2022). Use of ferulic acid in the management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Molecules 27 (18), 6010. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES27186010
Li, Y., Dong, J., Wang, S., Xiong, R., and Kang, X. (2025). High flavonoid diet alleviates chronic stress in cancer patients by optimization of the gut microbiota. Food and Funct. 16 (20), 8233–8247. doi:10.1039/D5FO02560E
Lippolis, T., D. N. V, C. M. C. G. R., Notarnicola, M., and De Nunzio, V. (2023). Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of diet polyphenols and their modulation of gut microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 3813. doi:10.3390/ijms24043813
Liu, Y., Song, Y., Li, S., and Mo, L. (2021). Cardioprotective effect of quercetin against ischemia/reperfusion injury is mediated through NO system and mitochondrial K-ATP channels. Cell J. (Yakhteh) 23 (2), 184–190. doi:10.22074/CELLJ.2021.7183
Liu Q, Q., He, Y., Fan, Q., Wu, Y., Li, J., Deng, S., et al. (2025). Tea plant-inspired nanoassembled supraparticles alleviate colitis and associated mental disorders via microbiota-gut-brain interactions. Theranostics 15 (15), 7291–7307. doi:10.7150/THNO.113573
Liu X, X., Alharbi, A., Gibson, R., and Rodriguez-Mateos, A. (2025). (Poly)phenol-gut microbiota interactions and their impact on human health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metabolic Care 28 (4), 316–322. doi:10.1097/MCO.0000000000001132
Mahdi, L., Graziani, A., Baffy, G., Mitten, E. K., Portincasa, P., Khalil, M., et al. (2025). Unlocking polyphenol efficacy: the role of gut Microbiota in modulating bioavailability and health effects. Nutrients 17 (17), 2793. doi:10.3390/NU17172793
Makarewicz, M., Drożdż, I., Tarko, T., and Duda-Chodak, A. (2021). The interactions between polyphenols and microorganisms, especially gut microbiota. Antioxidants 10 (2), 188. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX10020188
Manach, C., Scalbert, A., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., and Jiménez, L. (2004). Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79 (5), 727–747. doi:10.1093/AJCN/79.5.727
Mannino, F., Imbesi, C., Bitto, A., Minutoli, L., Squadrito, F., D’Angelo, T., et al. (2023). Anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of ellagic and punicic acid in an in vitro model of cardiac fibrosis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 162, 114666. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114666
Mansour, H., Slika, H., Nasser, S. A., Pintus, G., Khachab, M., Sahebkar, A., et al. (2024). Flavonoids, gut microbiota and cardiovascular disease: dynamics and interplay. Pharmacol. Res. 209, 107452. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107452
Marín, L. M. E. M. V. C. J., Lombó, F., Villar, C. J., and Lombó, F. (2015). Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism: antimicrobial properties. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 905215. doi:10.1155/2015/905215
Martín-Peláez, S., Castañer, O, and Konstantinidou, V. (2017). Effect of olive oil phenolic metabolites on the expression of blood pressure-related genes in healthy individuals.
Matiş, L., Alexandru, B. A., Fodor, R., Daina, L. G., Ghitea, T. C., and Vlad, S. (2023a). Effect of probiotic therapy on neuropsychiatric manifestations in children with multiple neurotransmitter disorders: a study. Biomedicines 11 (10), 2643. doi:10.3390/BIOMEDICINES11102643
Matiş, L., Alexandru, B. A., and Ghitea, T. C. (2023b). Catecholamine variations in pediatric gastrointestinal disorders and their neuropsychiatric expression. Biomedicines 11 (10), 2600. doi:10.3390/BIOMEDICINES11102600
Megur, A., Baltriukienė, D., Bukelskienė, V. B. A., and Burokas, A. (2020). The microbiota–gut–brain axis and Alzheimer’s disease: neuroinflammation is to blame? Nutrients 13, 37. doi:10.3390/nu13010037
Miao, R. R., Zhan, S., Hu, X. T., Yuan, W. M., Wu, L. J., Cui, S. X., et al. (2021). Myricetin and M10, a myricetin-3-O-β-d-lactose sodium salt, modify composition of gut microbiota in mice with ulcerative colitis. Toxicol. Lett. 346, 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.03.009
Mishima, E., and Abe, T. (2022). Role of the microbiota in hypertension and antihypertensive drug metabolism. Hypertens. Res. 45, 246–253. doi:10.1038/s41440-021-00804-0
Mithul Aravind, S., Wichienchot, S., Tsao, R., Ramakrishnan, S., and Chakkaravarthi, S. (2021). Role of dietary polyphenols on gut microbiota, their metabolites and health benefits. Food Res. Int. 142, 110189. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110189
Moghadam, F. H., Mesbah-Ardakani, M., and Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. (2018). Ferulic acid exerts concentration-dependent anti-apoptotic and neuronal differentiation-inducing effects in PC12 and mouse neural stem cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 841, 104–112. doi:10.1016/J.EJPHAR.2018.10.003
Mohsenzadeh, A., Pourasgar, S., Mohammadi, A., Nazari, M., Nematollahi, S., Karimi, Y., et al. (2025). The gut microbiota and cardiovascular disease: exploring the role of microbial dysbiosis and metabolites in pathogenesis and therapeutics. Life Sci. 381, 123981. doi:10.1016/J.LFS.2025.123981
Moon, H. S., Lee, H. G., Choi, Y. J., Kim, T. G., and Cho, C. S. (2007). Proposed mechanisms of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate for anti-obesity. Chemico-Biological Interact. 167 (2), 85–98. doi:10.1016/J.CBI.2007.02.008
Muhammad, T., Muhammad, T., Ikram, M., Ullah, R., Rehman, S. U., Kim, M. O., et al. (2019). Hesperetin, a citrus flavonoid, attenuates LPS-induced neuroinflammation, apoptosis and memory impairments by modulating TLR4/NF-κB signaling. Nutrients 11 (3), 648. doi:10.3390/NU11030648
Naowaboot, J., Piyabhan, P., Tingpej, P., Munkong, N., Parklak, W., and Pannangpetch, P. (2018). Anti-insulin resistant effect of ferulic acid on high fat diet-induced Obese mice. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 8 (12), 604–608. doi:10.4103/2221-1691.248098
Nassiri-Asl, M., Shariati-Rad, S., and Zamansoltani, F. (2008). Anticonvulsive effects of intracerebroventricular administration of rutin in rats. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol. Psychiatry 32 (4), 989–993. doi:10.1016/J.PNPBP.2008.01.011
Nazir, A., Farooq, B., Farooq, M., Anjum, S., Yousuf, S., Shafi, N., et al. (2024). “Concept and dynamics of Earth microbiome,” in Microbiome drivers of ecosystem function, 1–15.
Neveu, V., Perez-Jiménez, J., Vos, F., Crespy, V., du Chaffaut, L., Mennen, L., et al. (2010). Phenol-explorer: an online comprehensive database on polyphenol contents in foods. Database 2010, bap024. doi:10.1093/database/bap024
Nishida, A., Nishino, K., Sakai, K., Owaki, Y., Noda, Y. I. H., and Imaeda, H. (2021). Can control of gut microbiota be a future therapeutic option for inflammatory bowel disease? World J. Gastroenterol. 27, 3317–3326. doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i23.3317
Nouri, Z., Chen, J. T., El-Senduny, F. F., Sanadgol, N., Abd-ElGhani, G. E., Farzaei, M. H., et al. (2019). On the neuroprotective effects of naringenin: pharmacological targets, signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms, and clinical perspective. Biomolecules 9, 690. doi:10.3390/biom9110690
Novakovic, M., Rout, A., Kingsley, T., Kirchoff, R., Singh, A., Verma, V., et al. (2020). Role of gut microbiota in cardiovascular diseases. World J. Cardiol. 12 (4), 110–122. doi:10.4330/WJC.V12.I4.110
Oliveira, H., de F. V. O. J., C. P. P. A. R. A. P. M. N., Fernandes, I., Araújo, P., Mateus, N., de Freitas, V., et al. (2020). Exploring the applications of the photoprotective properties of anthocyanins in biological systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7464. doi:10.3390/ijms21207464
Ong, K. C., and Khoo, H. E. (1997). Biological effects of myricetin. General Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst. 29 (2), 121–126. doi:10.1016/S0306-3623(96)00421-1
Opipari, A. W., Tan, L., Boitano, A. E., Sorenson, D. R., Aurora, A., and Liu, J. R. (2004). Resveratrol-induced autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 64 (2), 696–703. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2404
Oyagbemi, A. A., Bolaji-Alabi, F. B., Ajibade, T. O., Adejumobi, O. A., Ajani, O. S., Jarikre, T. A., et al. (2020). Novel antihypertensive action of rutin is mediated via inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme/mineralocorticoid receptor/angiotensin 2 type 1 receptor (ATR1) signaling pathways in uninephrectomized hypertensive rats. J. Food Biochem. 44 (12), e13534. doi:10.1111/JFBC.13534;ISSUE:ISSUE
Pan, X., Wang, H., Li, C., Zhang, J. Z. H., and Ji, C. (2021). MolGpka: a web server for small molecule pKaPrediction using a graph-convolutional neural network. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (7), 3159–3165. doi:10.1021/ACS.JCIM.1C00075/SUPPL_FILE/CI1C00075_SI_005.XLSX
Pandi, A., Raghu, M. H., Chandrashekar, N., and Kalappan, V. M. (2022). Cardioprotective effects of ferulic acid against various drugs and toxic agents. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2022 11 (1), 92. doi:10.1186/S43088-022-00273-5
Parada Venegas, D., De la Fuente, M. K., Landskron, G., González, M. J., Quera, R., Dijkstra, G., et al. (2019). Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front. Immunol. 10, 277. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277
Paramanik, S., Ganguly, A., Rajak, P., and Paramanik, M. (2025). Bioactive plant-derived secondary metabolites in non-communicable disease management. Second. Metabolites Drug Discov., 395–418. doi:10.1002/9781394204595.CH15
Pärtty, A., Rautava, S., and Kalliomäki, M. (2018). Probiotics on pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders. Nutrients 10 (12), 1836. doi:10.3390/nu10121836
Pasinetti, G. M., Singh, R., Westfall, S., Herman, F., Faith, J., and Ho, L. (2018). The role of the gut microbiota in the metabolism of polyphenols as characterized by gnotobiotic mice, 63, 409, 421. doi:10.3233/jad-171151
Pérez-Burillo, S., and Rufián-Henares, J. Á. (2021). Green tea and its relation to human gut microbiome.
Petersen, K., and Mansell, T. J. (2025). Unveiling the prebiotic potential of polyphenols in gut health and metabolism. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 95, 103338. doi:10.1016/J.COPBIO.2025.103338
Pickard, J. M., Zeng, M. Y., and Caruso, R. (2017). “Gut microbiota: role in pathogen colonization,” in Immune responses, and inflammatory disease.
Plamada, D., and Vodnar, D. C. (2021). Polyphenols—gut microbiota interrelationship: a transition to a new generation of prebiotics. Nutrients 14 (1), 137. doi:10.3390/NU14010137
Pourová, J., Najmanová, I., Vopršalová, M., Migkos, T., Pilařová, V., Applová, L., et al. (2018). Two flavonoid metabolites, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and 4-methylcatechol, relax arteries ex vivo and decrease blood pressure in vivo. Vasc. Pharmacol. 111, 36–43. doi:10.1016/J.VPH.2018.08.008
Qiao, Y. S. J. X. S. T. X. S. Y., Le, G., Xia, S., Tang, X., and Shi, Y. (2014). Effects of resveratrol on gut microbiota and fat storage in a mouse model with high-fat-induced obesity. Food Funct. 5, 1241–1249. doi:10.1039/c3fo60630a
Quesada-Vázquez, S., Eseberri, I., Les, F., Pérez-Matute, P., Herranz-López, M., Atgié, C., et al. (2024). Polyphenols and metabolism: from present knowledge to future challenges. J. Physiology Biochem. 80 (3), 603–625. doi:10.1007/S13105-024-01046-7
Rajendra Prasad, N., Karthikeyan, A., Karthikeyan, S., and Venkata Reddy, B. (2010). Inhibitory effect of caffeic acid on cancer cell proliferation by oxidative mechanism in human HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell line. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 349 (1), 11–19. doi:10.1007/S11010-010-0655-7
Rana, A., Samtiya, M., Dhewa, T., Mishra, V., and Aluko, R. E. (2022). Health benefits of polyphenols: a concise review. J. Food Biochem. 46 (10), e14264. doi:10.1111/JFBC.14264
Rastmanesh, R. (2011). High polyphenol, low probiotic diet for weight loss because of intestinal microbiota interaction. Chemico-Biological Interact. 189 (1–2), 1–8. doi:10.1016/J.CBI.2010.10.002
Rekha, K., Venkidasamy, B., Samynathan, R., Nagella, P., Rebezov, M., Khayrullin, M., et al. (2024). Short-chain fatty acid: an updated review on signaling, metabolism, and therapeutic effects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 64, 2461–2489. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2124231
Renye, J. A., Mendez-Encinas, M. A., White, A. K., Miller, A. L., McAnulty, M. J., Yadav, M. P., et al. (2023). Antimicrobial activity of thermophilin 110 against the opportunistic pathogen Cutibacterium acnes. Biotechnol. Lett. 45 (10), 1365–1379. doi:10.1007/s10529-023-03419-2
Richards, E. M., Pepine, C. J., Raizada, M. K. K. S., and Kim, S. (2017). The gut, its microbiome, and hypertension. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 19, 36. doi:10.1007/s11906-017-0734-1
Riva, A., Kolimár, D., Spittler, A., Wisgrill, L., Herbold, C. W., Abrankó, L., et al. (2020). Conversion of rutin, a prevalent dietary flavonol, by the human gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 11, 585428. doi:10.3389/FMICB.2020.585428/TEXT
Rodríguez-Daza, M. C., Pulido-Mateos, E. C., Lupien-Meilleur, J., Guyonnet, D., Desjardins, Y., and Roy, D. (2021). Polyphenol-mediated gut microbiota modulation: toward prebiotics and further. Front. Nutr. 8, 689456. doi:10.3389/FNUT.2021.689456/FULL
Rodriguez-Mateos, A., Sayec, M. L., and Cheok, A. (2024). Dietary (poly)phenols and cardiometabolic health: from antioxidants to modulators of the gut microbiota. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 1–11. doi:10.1017/S0029665124000156
Ross, F. C., Mayer, D. E., Horn, J., Cryan, J. F., Del Rio, D., Randolph, E., et al. (2024). Potential of dietary polyphenols for protection from age-related decline and neurodegeneration: a role for gut microbiota? Nutr. Neurosci. 27 (9), 1058–1076. doi:10.1080/1028415X.2023.2298098;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:YNNS20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Rossi, L.De, Rocchetti, G., Rossi, L., Rocchetti, G., Lucini, L., Rebecchi, A., et al. (2025). Antimicrobial potential of polyphenols: mechanisms of action and microbial responses—A narrative review. Antioxidants 14 (2), 200. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX14020200
Rudrapal, M., and Chetia, D. (2016). Plant flavonoids as potential source of future antimalarial leads. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 8 (1), 13–18. doi:10.5530/SRP.2017.1.4
Rudrapal, M., Khan, J., Dukhyil, A. A. B., Alarousy, R. M. I. I., Attah, E. I., Sharma, T., et al. (2021). Chalcone scaffolds, bioprecursors of flavonoids: chemistry, bioactivities, and pharmacokinetics. Mol. Basel, Switz. 26 (23), 7177. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES26237177
Rudrapal, M., Khairnar, S. J., Khan, J., Dukhyil, A. B., Ansari, M. A., Alomary, M. N., et al. (2022a). Dietary polyphenols and their role in oxidative stress-induced human diseases: insights into protective effects, antioxidant potentials and mechanism(s) of action. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 806470. doi:10.3389/FPHAR.2022.806470/FULL
Rudrapal, M., Maji, S., Prajapati, S. K., Kesharwani, P., Deb, P. K., Khan, J., et al. (2022b). Protective effects of diets rich in polyphenols in cigarette smoke (CS)-induced oxidative damages and associated health implications. Antioxidants Basel, Switz. 11 (7), 1217. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX11071217
Rudrapal, M., Mishra, A. K., Rani, L., Sarwa, K. K., Zothantluanga, J. H., Khan, J., et al. (2022c). Nanodelivery of dietary polyphenols for therapeutic applications. Mol. Basel, Switz. 27 (24), 8706. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES27248706
Rudrapal, M., Rakshit, G., Singh, R. P., Garse, S., Khan, J., and Chakraborty, S. (2024). Dietary polyphenols: review on chemistry/sources, bioavailability/metabolism, antioxidant effects, and their role in disease management. Antioxidants Basel, Switz. 13 (4), 429. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX13040429
Saito, S. T., Welzel, A., Suyenaga, E. S., and Bueno, F. (2006). A method for fast determination of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), epicatechin (EC), catechin (C) and caffeine (CAF) in green tea using HPLC. Food Sci. Technol. 26 (2), 394–400. doi:10.1590/S0101-20612006000200023
Salau, V. F., and Shahidul Islam, M. (2024). Vanillin: a natural phenolic compound with neuroprotective benefits. Nat. Mol. Neuroprotection Neurotox., 1857–1879. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-23763-8.00055-5
Salau, V. F., Erukainure, O. L., Ijomone, O. M., and Islam, M. S. (2022). Caffeic acid regulates glucose homeostasis and inhibits purinergic and cholinergic activities while abating oxidative stress and dyslipidaemia in fructose-streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 74 (7), 973–984. doi:10.1093/JPP/RGAC021
Samtiya, M., Aluko, R. E., Dhewa, T., and Moreno-Rojas, J. M. (2021). Potential health benefits of plant food-derived bioactive components: an overview. Foods 10 (4), 839. doi:10.3390/FOODS10040839
Sarubbo, F., Moranta, D., Tejada, S., Jiménez, M., and Esteban, S. (2023). Impact of gut microbiota in brain ageing: polyphenols as beneficial modulators. Antioxidants (Basel). 12, 812. doi:10.3390/antiox12040812
Sathyamoorthy, N., and Wang, T. T. Y. (1997). Differential effects of dietary phyto-oestrogens daidzein and equol on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Eur. J. Cancer 33 (14), 2384–2389. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00303-1
Scalbert, A., and Williamson, G. (2000). Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols. J. Nutr. 130, 2073S-85S. doi:10.1093/jn/130.8.2073S
Schippa, S., and Conte, M. P. (2014). Dysbiotic events in gut microbiota: impact on human health. Nutrients 6, 5786–5805. doi:10.3390/nu6125786
Scott, N., Whittle, E., Jeraldo, P., and Chia, N. (2022a). A systemic review of the role of enterotoxic Bacteroides fragilis in colorectal cancer. Neoplasia 29. doi:10.1016/J.NEO.2022.100797
Scott, M. B., Styring, A. K., and McCullagh, J. S. O. (2022b). Polyphenols: bioavailability, microbiome interactions and cellular effects on health in humans and animals. Pathogens 11 (7), 770. doi:10.3390/PATHOGENS11070770
Selma, M., Tomás-Barberán, F. A., and Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2009). Interaction between phenolics and gut microbiota: role in human health. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 6485–6501. doi:10.1021/jf902107d
Senizza, A., Lucini, L., Mosele, J. I., Patrone, V., Callegari, M. L., Morelli, L., et al. (2020). Lignans and gut microbiota: an interplay revealing potential health implications. Molecules 25, 5709. doi:10.3390/molecules25235709
Shi, R., Gao, D., Stoika, R., Liu, K., Sik, A., and Jin, M. (2024). Potential implications of polyphenolic compounds in neurodegenerative diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 64 (16), 5491–5514. doi:10.1080/10408398.2022.2155106
Shorobi, F. M., Rahman, M. A., Saha, S., Chowdhury, M. A. H., Srisuphanunt, M., Hossain, K. H., et al. (2023). Quercetin: a functional food-flavonoid incredibly attenuates emerging and Re-Emerging viral infections through immunomodulatory actions. Molecules 28, 938. doi:10.3390/molecules28030938
Simó, C., and García-Cañas, V. (2020). Dietary bioactive metabolites to modulate the gut microbiota-derived metabolite TMAO.
Singh, M., Arseneault, M., Sanderson, T., Murthy, V., and Ramassamy, C. (2008). Challenges for research on polyphenols from foods in Alzheimer’s disease: bioavailability, metabolism, and cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56 (13), 4855–4873. doi:10.1021/JF0735073
Singh, N., Chaput, L., and Villoutreix, B. O. (2021). Virtual screening web servers: designing chemical probes and drug candidates in the cyberspace. Briefings Bioinforma. 22 (Issue 2), 1790–1818. doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa034
Singha, S., Viswakarma, J. N., and Gupta, V. K. (2023). Foodborne illnesses of Escherichia coli O157origin and its control measures. J. Food Sci. Technol. 60, 1274–1283. doi:10.1007/s13197-022-05381-9
Skrajnowska, D., Bielecki, W., Szterk, A., Ofiara, K., and Bobrowska-Korczak, B. (2024). Genistein supplementation and bone health in breast cancer in rats. Nutrients 16 (6), 912. doi:10.3390/nu16060912
Spagnuolo, C., Russo, G. L., Orhan, I. E., Habtemariam, S., Daglia, M., Sureda, A., et al. (2015). Genistein and cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions. Adv. Nutr. 6 (4), 408–419. doi:10.3945/an.114.008052
Srivastava, A., Kataria, A., Yadav, D. K. H. I., and Choi, E. H. (2022). Interplay of alpha-synuclein pathology and gut microbiome in parkinson’s disease, 159, 178. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91313-3.00003-9
Steinmann, J., Buer, J., Pietschmann, T., and Steinmann, E. (2013). Anti-infective properties of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a component of green tea. Br. J. Pharmacol. 168 (5), 1059–1073. doi:10.1111/BPH.12009
Stevens, J. F., and Maier, C. S. (2016). The chemistry of gut microbial metabolism of polyphenols. Phytochemistry Rev. Proc. Phytochemical Soc. Eur. 15 (3), 425–444. doi:10.1007/S11101-016-9459-Z
Stojanov, S., Berlec, A., and Štrukelj, B. (2020). The influence of probiotics on the firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms 8 (11), 1715. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8111715
Sun, W., and Shahrajabian, M. H. (2023). Therapeutic potential of phenolic compounds in medicinal plants—natural health products for human health. Molecules 28 (4), 1845. doi:10.3390/molecules28041845
Szabo, Z., Koczka, V., Marosvolgyi, T., Szabo, E., Frank, E., Polyak, E., et al. (2021). Possible biochemical processes underlying the positive health effects of plant-based diets—A narrative review. Nutrients 13 (8), 2593. doi:10.3390/NU13082593
Taheri, Y., Suleria, H. A. R., Martins, N., Sytar, O., Beyatli, A., Yeskaliyeva, B., et al. (2020). Myricetin bioactive effects: moving from preclinical evidence to potential clinical applications. BMC Complementary Med. Ther. 20 (1), 241. doi:10.1186/S12906-020-03033-Z
Tai, A., Sawano, T., Yazama, F., and Ito, H. (2011). Evaluation of antioxidant activity of vanillin by using multiple antioxidant assays. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subj. 1810 (2), 170–177. doi:10.1016/J.BBAGEN.2010.11.004
Tain, Y.-L., Chang, S. K. C., Liao, J.-X., Chen, Y.-W., Huang, H.-T., Li, Y.-L., et al. (2021). Synthesis of short-chain-fatty-acid resveratrol esters and their antioxidant properties. Antioxidants 10 (3), 420. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX10030420
Tao, W., Chen, S., Shen, X., Cao, Y., Shi, J., Ye, X., et al. (2019). Rethinking the mechanism of the health benefits of proanthocyanidins: absorption, metabolism, and interaction with gut microbiota. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 18, 971–985. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12444
Testai, L., Pozzo, E., Piano, I., Pistelli, L., Gargini, C., Breschi, M. C., et al. (2017). The citrus flavanone naringenin produces cardioprotective effects in hearts from 1 year old rat, through activation of mitoBK channels. Front. Pharmacol. 8 (FEB), 71. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00071
Thangavel, P., Puga-Olguín, A., Rodríguez-Landa, J. F., and Zepeda, R. C. (2019). Genistein as potential therapeutic candidate for menopausal symptoms and other related diseases. Molecules 24 (21), 3892. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES24213892
Tian, Z., Wang, J., Xu, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., and Zhou, Y. (2016). Resveratrol improves cognitive impairment by regulating apoptosis and synaptic plasticity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Cell. Physiology Biochem. 40 (6), 1670–1677. doi:10.1159/000453216
Tomás-Barberán, F. A., Selma, M. V., and Espín, J. C. (2016). Interactions of gut microbiota with dietary polyphenols and consequences to human health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metabolic Care 19 (Issue 6), 471–476. doi:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000314
Torres-Maravilla, E., Holowacz, S., Delannoy, J., Lenoir, L., Jacouton, E., Gervason, S., et al. (2022). Serpin-positive Bifidobacterium breve CNCM I-5644 improves intestinal permeability in two models of irritable bowel syndrome. Sci. Rep. 12 (1), 19776. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21746-8
Townsend, E. M., Kelly, L., Muscatt, G., Box, J. D., Hargraves, N., Lilley, D., et al. (2021). The human gut phageome: origins and roles in the human gut microbiome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 643214. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.643214
Tsuda, T. (2018). Curcumin as a functional food-derived factor: degradation products, metabolites, bioactivity, and future perspectives. Food Funct. 9 (2), 705–714. doi:10.1039/c7fo01242j
Tuli, H. S., Tuorkey, M. J., Thakral, F., Sak, K., Kumar, M., Sharma, A. K., et al. (2019). Molecular mechanisms of action of genistein in cancer: recent advances. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 489844. doi:10.3389/FPHAR.2019.01336/TEXT
Tzounis, X., Vulevic, J., Kuhnle, G. G. C., George, T., Leonczak, J., Gibson, G. R., et al. (2008). Flavanol monomer-induced changes to the human faecal microflora. Br. J. Nutr. 99 (4), 782–792. doi:10.1017/S0007114507853384
Vamanu, E., and Rai, S. N. (2021). The link between obesity, microbiota dysbiosis, and neurodegenerative pathogenesis, 9, 45. doi:10.3390/diseases9030045
Van Dorsten, F. A., Peters, S., Gross, G., Gomez-Roldan, V., Klinkenberg, M., De Vos, R. C., et al. (2012). Gut microbial metabolism of polyphenols from Black tea and red wine/grape juice is source-specific and colon-region dependent. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 (45), 11331–11342. doi:10.1021/jf303165w
Verhaar, B. J. H., Prodan, A., Nieuwdorp, M., and Muller, M. (2020). Gut microbiota in hypertension and atherosclerosis: a review. Nutrients 12, 2982. doi:10.3390/nu12102982
Verma, R. P., and Hansch, C. (2004). An approach towards the quantitative structure-activity relationships of caffeic acid and its derivatives. ChemBioChem 5 (9), 1188–1195. doi:10.1002/CBIC.200400094
Vessal, M., Hemmati, M., and Vasei, M. (2003). Antidiabetic effects of quercetin in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats. Comp. Biochem. Physiology Part C Toxicol. and Pharmacol. 135 (3), 357–364. doi:10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00140-6
Vestergaard, M., and Ingmer, H. (2019). Antibacterial and antifungal properties of resveratrol. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 53, 716–723. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.02.015
Vladimir-Knežević, S., Blažeković, B., Vladimir-Knežević, S., Blažeković, B., Štefan, M. B., Babac, M., et al. (2012). Plant polyphenols as antioxidants influencing the human health. Phytochemicals As Nutraceuticals - Glob. Approaches Their Role Nutr. Health. doi:10.5772/27843
Wang, L., Ding, J., Pan, L., Cao, D., Jiang, H., Ding, X., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence facilitates drug design in the big data era. Chemom. Intelligent Laboratory Syst. 194, 103850. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103850
Wang, P., Li, D., Ke, W., Liang, D., Hu, X., and Chen, F. (2020). Resveratrol-induced gut microbiota reduces obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice. Int. J. Obes. 44 (1), 213–225. doi:10.1038/s41366-019-0332-1
Wang, X., Qi, Y., and Zheng, H. (2022). Dietary polyphenol, gut microbiota, and health benefits. Antioxidants 11 (6), 1212. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX11061212
Westfall, S., Caracci, F., Zhao, D., Wu, Q., Frolinger, T., Simon, J., et al. (2021). Microbiota metabolites modulate the T helper 17 to regulatory T cell (Th17/Treg) imbalance promoting resilience to stress-induced anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors. Brain, Behav. Immun. 91, 350–368. doi:10.1016/J.BBI.2020.10.013
Wu, J. M., and Hsieh, T. chen. (2011). Resveratrol: a cardioprotective substance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1215 (1), 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05854.x
Wu, Z., and Liu, L. (2022). The protective activity of genistein against bone and cartilage diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 1016981. doi:10.3389/FPHAR.2022.1016981/FULL
Wu, H. J., and Wu, E. (2012). The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes 3, 4–14. doi:10.4161/gmic.19320
Wu, L., Li, J., Liu, T., Li, S., Feng, J., Yu, Q., et al. (2019). Quercetin shows anti-tumor effect in hepatocellular carcinoma LM3 cells by abrogating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Cancer Med. 8 (10), 4806–4820. doi:10.1002/CAM4.2388
Yang, H., Barros-Rios, J., Kourteva, G., Rao, X., Chen, F., Shen, H., et al. (2017). A re-evaluation of the final step of vanillin biosynthesis in the orchid Vanilla planifolia. Phytochemistry 139, 33–46. doi:10.1016/J.PHYTOCHEM.2017.04.003
Yao, Z., Li, C., Gu, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, L., Meng, G., et al. (2019). Dietary myricetin intake is inversely associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population. Nutr. Res. 68, 82–91. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2019.06.004
You, L., Huang, W. K., and Chen, S. Y. (2025). Unveiling the anticancer potential of flavonoids in hepatocellular carcinoma through microbiome and spatially resolved metabolomics analysis. Discov. Oncol. 16 (1), 1327. doi:10.1007/S12672-025-03159-X
Yuan, X., Wei, G., You, Y., Huang, Y., Lee, H. J., Dong, M., et al. (2017). Rutin ameliorates obesity through brown fat activation. FASEB J. 31 (1), 333–345. doi:10.1096/FJ.201600459RR;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:15306860;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Zaitone, S. A., Ahmed, E., Elsherbiny, N. M., Mehanna, E. T., El-Kherbetawy, M. K., ElSayed, M. H., et al. (2018). Caffeic acid improves locomotor activity and lessens inflammatory burden in a mouse model of rotenone-induced nigral neurodegeneration: relevance to Parkinson’s disease therapy. Pharmacol. Rep. 2018 71 (1), 32–41. doi:10.1016/J.PHAREP.2018.08.004
Zalila-Kolsi, I., Dhieb, D., Osman, H. A., and Mekideche, H. (2025). The gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: understanding the link and exploring therapeutic interventions. Biology 14 (3), 251. doi:10.3390/BIOLOGY14030251
Zeb, F., Naqeeb, H., Osaili, T., Faris, M. A. E., Ismail, L. C., Obaid, R. S., et al. (2024). Molecular crosstalk between polyphenols and gut microbiota in cancer prevention. Nutr. Res. 124, 21–42. doi:10.1016/J.NUTRES.2024.01.012
Zeiss, C. J. (2015). Improving the predictive value of interventional animal models data. Drug Discov. Today 20 (4), 475–482. doi:10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2014.10.015
Zeng, L., Xiang, R., Fu, C., Qu, Z., and Liu, C. (2022). The regulatory effect of chlorogenic acid on gut-brain function and its mechanism: a systematic review. Biomed. Pharmacother 149, 112831. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112831
Zhai, L., Huang, C., Ning, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhuang, M., Yang, W., et al. (2023). Ruminococcus gnavus plays a pathogenic role in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome by increasing serotonin biosynthesis. Cell Host Microbe 31 (1), 33–44.e5. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2022.11.006
Zhang, S., Zhu, Q., Chen, J. Y., OuYang, D., and Lu, J. H. (2020). The pharmacological activity of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on Alzheimer’s disease animal model: a systematic review. Phytomedicine 79, 153316. doi:10.1016/J.PHYMED.2020.153316
Zhang S, S., Mao, B., Cui, S., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J., Tang, X., et al. (2024). Absorption, metabolism, bioactivity, and biotransformation of epigallocatechin gallate. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 64 (19), 6546–6566. doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2170972
Zhang Y, Y., Wang, H., Sang, Y., Liu, M., Wang, Q., Yang, H., et al. (2024). Gut microbiota in health and disease: advances and future prospects. MedComm 5 (12), e70012. doi:10.1002/MCO2.70012
Zhao, Z., and Moghadasian, M. H. (2008). Chemistry, natural sources, dietary intake and pharmacokinetic properties of ferulic acid: a review. Food Chem. 109 (4), 691–702. doi:10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2008.02.039
Zhou, Y., Zhang, N., Arikawa, A. Y., and Chen, C. (2019). Inhibitory effects of green tea polyphenols on microbial metabolism of aromatic amino acids in humans revealed by metabolomic analysis. Metabolites 9 (5), 96. doi:10.3390/metabo9050096
Keywords: dietary polyphenols, gut microbiota, polyphenol bioavailability, polyphenolmetabolites, health outcomes
Citation: Rudrapal M, de Oliveira AM and Singh RP (2026) Dietary polyphenols maintain human health through modulation of gut microbiota. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1710088. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1710088
Received: 21 September 2025; Accepted: 25 November 2025;
Published: 05 January 2026.
Edited by:
Sidharth Prasad Mishra, University of South Florida, United StatesReviewed by:
Abdullah Shaito, Qatar University, QatarCosmin Mihai Vesa, University of Oradea, Romania
Raquel de Cássia dos Santos, Sao Francisco University, Brazil
Shengqian Sun, Yantai Institute of Technology, China
Copyright © 2026 Rudrapal, de Oliveira and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mithun Rudrapal, cnNtcnBhbEBnbWFpbC5jb20=
Ravi Pratap Singh3