SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry, 20 December 2018

Sec. Forensic Psychiatry

Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00716

The Costs of Healthcare in Prison and Custody: Systematic Review of Current Estimates and Proposed Guidelines for Future Reporting

  • 1. College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

  • 2. Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • 3. Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to review prison healthcare expenditure internationally.

Objectives: To systematically review healthcare spending on prisoners worldwide, examine comparability between countries, and develop guidelines to improve reporting.

Methods: Five bibliographic indexes (International Monetary Fund, ProQuest: Statistical Abstracts of the World, PubMed, Google Scholar, and JSTOR) were searched for the costs of prison and prison healthcare, supplemented with country-specific searches for the 20 countries with the highest prison populations. Information on overall healthcare costs, their breakdown by categories, and their proportion to overall prison expenditure was extracted. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

Results: Prison healthcare expenditure data was identified for 10 countries, and overall operating costs were reported for 12 countries. The most commonly reported healthcare cost was for primary medical care. Healthcare costs reporting varied widely, and few countries were comparable. We developed a set of guidelines for consistent and transparent reporting of healthcare costs.

Conclusions: Few countries report the costs of healthcare services in prison. When reported, there is a lack of clarity and consistency as to what is included. Using the proposed reporting guidelines would enable national trends and international comparisons to be investigated, and any recommended benchmarks to be monitored.

Introduction

Healthcare in prison varies widely across countries, and differences in service provision contribute to morbidity and mortality outcomes inside custody (1) and on release (2). Many studies have examined disease prevalence rates, and prevention, care, and treatment in prison (3, 4), but the current evidence base lacks information on the costs of healthcare services. Combined with information on the prevalence of healthcare problems, international comparisons of prison health expenditure could better inform decisions on the levels of appropriate funding, enable benchmarks to be monitored, and allow for planning of service provision.

Information on the costs of operating prisons have been published since the 1950s (5), including a 2004 report of international costs (6). However, no review of prison healthcare costs across countries currently exists. Government and other reports of healthcare costs in prisons have been published, but it is not clear in reporting what particular services are included, which examine variously “medical care” (7), “prison hospitals” (8), or “prisoner health” (9). Furthermore, what is included within these categories is not clear. Scotland, for instance, lists mental health and dental care as prison healthcare expenditures (10), while Australia provides only a single overarching figure for prisoner health (9).

In this systematic review, we have aimed to provide an international overview of the annual costs of prisoner healthcare, what healthcare services are included in the identified reports, and calculate the proportion of overall prison operating budgets allocated to health. In addition, we develop and propose reporting guidelines.

Methods

Search Strategy

We searched IMF, ProQuest: Statistical Abstracts of the World, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and PubMed databases. We performed non-country specific searches, with a combination of keywords: “prison” OR “justice,” AND “expenditure,” “spending,” OR “costs” (Table 1 for details). Then, additional targeted searches on Google Web and government databases (e.g., Statistics Canada) were conducted for the 20 countries with the largest prison population (11) and countries included in a previous review of recidivism rates (12), with a combination of keywords: country name AND “prison healthcare cost,” country name AND “ministry of justice,” country name AND “prison” AND “expenditure” OR “service.” No language or publication date restrictions were set, and the most recent and relevant cost report was identified. When necessary, correctional services were contacted to clarify data. A review protocol [CRD42018102534] was submitted and published on the PROSPERO register of systematic review during data extraction.

Table 1

DatabaseSearch termsAdditional criteria
IMF datasets“prison” AND “expenditure”
OR
“prison” AND “costs”
Time series datasets (no Filters used)
(classified as “Budgetary Central
Government” OR
“Extrabudgetary Central
Government” OR “General
Government” OR “Local
Governments” OR “Social
Security Funds” OR “State
Governments” OR “Central
Government”
+ in “Domestic Currency” OR “Percent of GDP”
+ “Expenditure on Prisons”
ProQuest: Statistical Abstracts of the World“prison” AND “expenditure”
OR
“justice” AND “expenditure”
OR
“prison” AND “health”
No Applied Filters
JSTOR“prison spending”
OR
“prison expenditure”
OR
“prison costs”
No restrictions
Google Scholar“prison expenditure”
OR
“prison service spending”
No restrictions
PubMed(“prisons”[MeSH Terms] OR
“prisons”[All Fields] OR
“prison”[All Fields]) AND (“health expenditures”[MeSH Terms] OR
(“health”[All Fields] AND “expenditures”[All Fields]) OR
“health expenditures”[All Fields] OR “expenditure”[All Fields])
No restrictions

Database Search Strategies.

Per-prisoner estimates for each country were calculated as follows:

  • Identifying total expenditures from the included reports (excluding the US and Germany, which reported per-prisoner expenditure based on all state prison populations)

  • Calculation of per-prisoner cost (using the prison population from World Prison Brief statistics) (13). If the prison population was not available for the same year as the cost report, the following year's prison population was used;

  • Conversion of per-prisoner cost estimate into inflation-adjusted 2016 International US dollars (using “CCEMG-EPPI-Center Cost Converter” external database). Stage 1 and 2 computational values (GDP deflator and PPP) of the validated conversion tool were obtained from IMF World Economic Outlook Database. Costs were first adjusted for inflation within original economy [using GDP deflator values], and then to purchasing power parity/price level between countries (14).

The cost conversions in this review may be limited by using purchasing power parities for Gross Domestic Product, which cover a broader array of goods and services than context-specific purchasing power parities (e.g., healthcare or technology purchasing power parities). However, based on the heterogeneity of costs and inventories reported by countries, purchasing power parities for Gross Domestic Product appeared to be more fitting for this review than context-specific conversion factors (14).

Study Design

Geographical

Official national and regional data were extracted from search engines. Unofficial regional data was found for one country (15), but was not included.

Data Items

The measurements and descriptions of economic costs were limited to direct prison operating costs and/or healthcare costs. Studies reporting indirect costs to prisoners (e.g., productivity loss) were excluded. The most recent information was used. Most countries presented financial accounts for the 2015–16 or 2016–17 periods, so all cost outcomes were indexed to 2016 International US dollars.

Data Sources

Financial reports on prisons/correctional services solely were included. Datasets which did not specify relevant outcome measurements (i.e., prison operations, healthcare) or the population (i.e., whole country, adult prisoners) were excluded. Expenditure reporting on police, courts, or other services affiliated with Ministries of Justice was excluded, as were assessments of prisoner health services separate from expenditure data (16). Governments typically separate prison expenditures into capital and operating costs. Capital costs refer to fixed, one-time investments on buildings, equipment, or land. Operating costs of prisons refer to day-to-day running costs, accommodation-related costs, and staff costs (17). Ideally, prison healthcare broadly refers to the services in place to address health needs and reduce health risks. It can include primary and psychiatric care, and specialized services. Information for two other countries (Greece and Switzerland) were available but not used. They were not from official governmental sources, did not specify constituent elements of costs, and are likely to be underestimates (7, 15). Costs for Sweden did not include infrastructure costs and were also not included (18).

Data Extraction

One of the authors (SS) screened and extracted the data, excluding publications and data points that did not report costs, and determined the remit of the data (e.g., national, regional).

Data Analysis

Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity in definition and measurement of cost outcomes.

Subgroup Comparison

We compared healthcare cost descriptions by country to account for differences in categorization of expenses. Descriptions for the most recent period are included. PRISMA guidelines were followed (Table S1, Figure 1). SS and SF assessed primary outcome measures of healthcare service costs and summary descriptions.

Figure 1

Results

We identified official country reports of prison healthcare costs for 10 countries (Table 2).

Table 2

CountryPublisherSourceYear of reportingExpenditure categorySample
Sri LankaMinistry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous MedicineNational Health Accounts2013HealthNational prison hospitals (central government-financed)
RomaniaMinistry of JusticeMinistry of Justice2016HealthNational Penitentiary System
IndiaMinistry of Home AffairsNational Crime Records Bureau State/UT Prison Headquarters2015Health and OperatingState Prisons/Jails (“prisons” and “jails” used interchangeably)
South AfricaDepartment of Correctional Services (DCS)Annual Report of Department of Correctional Services2016–17Health and OperatingDCS National Facilities
IrelandIrish Prison ServiceIrish Prison Service2013HealthNational - All prisons (open, closed, and high security), including pre-trial detainees
Irish Prison ServiceIrish Prison Service2015OperatingNational - All prisons (open, closed, and high security), including pre-trial detainees
BelgiumBelgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)KCE Report 293Cs2015HealthNational - All Belgian prisons (35 prisons recorded in 2015)
AustraliaProductivity CommissionProductivity Commission for the Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision2015–16Health and OperatingNational - Department of Correctional Services
UK: ScotlandThe Scottish ParliamentHealth and Sport Committee2016–17HealthNational - Scottish Prison Service (15 prisons)
Scottish Prison ServiceAudit Scotland2015–16OperatingNational - Scottish Prison Service (15 prisons)
United StatesPEW Charitable TrustsPEW, Vera Institute of Justice, and state officials2015HealthState prisons (and jail populations of five states)
Bureau of Justice StatisticsDepartment of Justice2001OperatingState Prisons
UK: England and WalesNational Audit OfficeComptroller and Auditor General2016–17HealthNational
Ministry of JusticeMinistry of Justice and HM Prison and Probation Services2016–17Operating/DirectNational
FranceMinistry of JusticeDirectorate of Prison Administration2015OperatingNational
SingaporeMinistry of Home AffairsMinistry of Home Affairs2016 FYOperatingNational
CanadaStatistics CanadaStatistics Canada2016–17OperatingProvinces and Territories
GermanyThe Berlin Senate Department for Justice and Consumer ProtectionThe Berlin Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection2013OperatingAll German States
New ZealandDepartment of CorrectionsDepartment of Corrections2015–16OperatingNational
UK: Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS)NIPS2016–17OperatingNational

Country reports.

Annual healthcare expenditures per prisoner ranged from approximately $34 per year to $6,714 per year (Table 3). There was also wide variation in the percentage of operating costs attributable to healthcare, ranging from 2 to 18% (Table 4).

Table 3

CountryPer prisoner cost (2016 US$)Year of reporting
Sri Lanka (8)$342013
Romania (19)$1032016
India (20)$1092015–16
South Africa (21)$1,0012016–17
Ireland (22)$2,9322013
Belgium (23)$4,7482015
Australia (9]$5,0962015–16
UK: Scotland (10)$5,2882016–17
United States (24)$5,7202015
UK: England and Wales (25)$6,7142016–17

Reported annual healthcare expenditure per prisoner.

Table 4

CountryAnnual operating expenditure per prisoner (indexed to 2016)Healthcare expenditure as % of operating expenditure
India (20)$5,9002%
South Africa (21)$22,4124%
United States [State Prisons] (24, 26)$29,97818%
France (27)$44,410N/A
Singapore (28)$48,406N/A
Canada [Provincial, State, Territorial] (29)$49,251N/A
UK: England and Wales (25, 30)$50,67513%
Australia (9)$56,7869%
Germany (31)$57,380N/A
UK: Scotland (10, 32)$60,9439%
New Zealand (17)$65,336N/A
Ireland (22, 33)$68,0194%
Northern Ireland (34)$76,516N/A

Annual overall prison operating costs and healthcare expenditure as percentage of operating expenditures.

Seven countries described the constituent elements of healthcare spending, but these were not comparable (Table 5). The most commonly reported cost outcome was “primary medical care,” followed together by “medical supplies” (mostly medication) and “mental health services.” In the three countries (Sri Lanka, Ireland, Australia) that did not clarify expenditures, categorization varied from “curative care” (8) to “medical care” (22) to “prisoner health costs” (9). Most countries did not clarify how expenditure was allocated across services.

Table 5

Primary medical CareMedical supplies (incl. medicines)Mental Health services (incl. visiting psychologists/psychiatrist)Staff (incl. doctors, nurses, pharmacists)Diagnostic Tests (incl. lab services and screening)DentalSubstance abuse treatmentConsultants (incl. External psychiatric, gynecological, dental, optical)Nursing careHygieneOther*
Sri Lanka (8)X
Romania (19)XXX
India (28)XXXXX
South Africa (21)XXXXX
Ireland (22)
Belgium (23)XXXXXXXX
UK: Scotland (10)XXXXXXXXX
Australia (9)X
United States (24)XXXXXXX
UK: England & Wales (25)XXX

Healthcare expenditure descriptions.

*

see Table S2 for full inclusion and exclusion details.

In India, health services include “visiting psychologists/psychiatrists.”

Discussion

In this systematic review, we identified 10 countries that have reported healthcare costs in prisons. In addition, we were able to calculate the proportion of overall operating expenditure allocated to healthcare in 7 countries. Among the 20 countries with the highest prison populations (11), only 4 reported operating and healthcare expenditures on prisoners (20, 21, 24, 25). There were large variations in how healthcare costs were defined across countries, and consistency and transparency is required to enable international comparison. We have sought to address this by developing guidelines for future reporting.

One other finding was that only two countries reported spending more than 10% of their overall prison operating budgets on prison health (24, 25). Additionally, we did not find any clear links between overall spending and the proportion on healthcare. Notably, Ireland had the highest overall operating expenditure per prisoner among the countries reporting healthcare costs, but only 4% of its budget was allocated toward healthcare, which put it among the countries with the lowest proportion (22, 33).

Seven of the 10 countries that reported on healthcare expenditure provided specific detail on the services provided. The breakdown of these services varied between countries. It was not clear in some cases whether staff expenses included salaries of allied health professionals such as pharmacists, technicians, dentists, and visiting doctors (23), or whether “medical supplies” included medicines and medical equipment (21). Dental services lacked sufficient detail (10, 24), and mental health services were defined inconsistently across countries, with some countries integrating addiction care into mental health services (10, 24, 25), but another not (20).

One main implication of these findings is that international comparisons of healthcare expenditures on prisoners are currently not possible due to lack of consistency and transparency in reporting. To address this, we have developed a brief checklist covering definitions, inclusion, and exclusion criteria, and sources of funding that contribute to prison healthcare (such as national health services or ministry of justice) (Table 6). This checklist follows the structure of existing national financial audits, and is based on examples of good practice based on the current review, those categories that appear to be most consistently reported, and previous context-specific reporting guidelines (12, 15, 24, 36). The current proposed checklist would enable international comparison of overall healthcare expenditure in prisons, and provide country specific breakdowns as to how resources are allocated. Consistent international reporting would assist in monitoring whether countries meet basic standards for prisoner health, and allow for examination of links between adverse health outcomes in prisoners and variation in services provided. It would also help to develop and monitor recommended levels of appropriate funding. Different governments are likely to have competing additional priorities of healthcare need (20, 21), which will be reflected in how resources are spent and be reported in this checklist. Systematic reporting of expenditure may lead to improved health outcomes for prisoners by, for example, targeting specific areas of need in future service provision. They could also lead to increased efficiency and a greater focus on prevention. We recommend that prison services include the checklist information in annual accounts, where expenditures are often separated by service category and funding source (37). We have sought to streamline these guidelines to assist in feasibility of completion, standardization, and integration into national financial audits.

Table 6

COUNTRY
Time Period:-For which financial year(s) are you reporting?
Prisons Operating Expenditure:-Does this include depreciation, financial payments on capital assets, fixed assets, and/or transfers/subsidies? (Recommendation: exclude these costs)
Prisons Health Expenditure:-What was the annual expenditure on physical and mental healthcare?
% Operating Budget allocated to Medical Care:-What percentage of the overall budget allocated to prisons went toward prisoner medical/healthcare?
PRISONER POPULATION
I. Context/Demographics:Guidelines
a. GeographicalAre you reporting prison expenditures for the whole country, or a particular region?Report whole country
b. Sample sizeWhich prison population(s) are being sampled and accounted for in expenditure reporting?Include all adult (18 and older) private, public, and remand /detainees/unconvicted prisoners Include federal and provincial/regional prison institutions
c. CharacteristicsAge, gender, ethnicity, health insurance statusReport age distribution in 10-year increments, natal gender, white vs. non-white ethnicity and health insurance status of incarcerated persons
d. Length of current sentenceDistribution of offense types and sentence length (35)Categories: violence (including robbery), sex offense (contact vs. non-contact), burglary/theft, drug offense, other Report sentence length in following bands: < 1 year, 1–3 years, 4–9 years, >10 years, life sentence
II. Exclusion Criteria
a. Other samplesWhich samples are not included in financial accounting?Exclude prisoners under 18 years of age, and those in immigration detention centers and police custody, and persons in external secure mental health facilities
COST OUTCOMES
I. Priority AreasGuidelines
a. Medical SuppliesHow much money was allocated to medical supplies for prisoners? List goods included.Include expenditures on pharmaceuticals/drugs, disability aids, vaccines, and equipment maintenance (separately if possible)
b. Healthcare PersonnelHow much was spent on payroll services?Report total amount spent on salaries of doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and technicians
How much was spent on non-payroll services?Report expenditures on visiting psychiatrists and external consultants
c. Diagnostic: Screenings and TestsHow much was spent on screenings for diseases in prisons? What types of diagnostic tests are offered?Report expenditures on TB/AIDS/other screenings and laboratory/imaging tests separately
d. Primary CareHow much was spent on primary care services for prisons?Report expenditures on GP Medical care and Nursing care separately
e. PsychiatricHow much money was allocated to psychiatric services in prisons?Report expenditure on mental health programs and services
f. RehabilitationIs rehabilitative healthcare included in prison expenditure? If yes, how much was spent?Report expenditure on substance abuse treatment only
g. DentalAre dental services included in prison expenditure? If yes, how much was spent?Report expenditure on dental services (e.g., general cleaning, orthodontics)
h. OpticalAre optical services included in prison expenditure? If yes, how much was spent?Report expenditure on optical services (e.g., eye exams, glasses)
i. Maternal and ChildAre maternal and child health services included in prison expenditure? If yes, what services are provided and how much was spent?Report expenditure on maternal and child health services (e.g., nutrition)
j. Surgical ProceduresAre any surgical procedures included in prison expenditure? If yes, how much was spent?Report expenditures on any surgical procedures
k. Specialized ServicesAre any other specialized on-site services included in prison expenditure? If yes, how much was spent?Report expenditures on Gynecological, Palliative, Physiotherapy, Chemotherapy/Radiation, Occupational health services (if offered in prison)
l. OtherAre there any other health-related expenses?Example: Hospitalizations, Hygiene
II. Exclusion CriteriaGuidelines
a. Capital CostsMedical Equipment, Depreciation, Payments on assetsExample: How much was spent on procedural equipment, lab/imaging equipment, or payments on assets?
b. Social ServicesSpiritual and social work servicesExample: Religious ministry
c. TransportTransport costsExclude ambulatory stay costs (i.e. emergency hospital stays following use of an ambulance)
d. Off-SiteSpecialized outpatient careExclude care unavailable on-site
e. OtherAre there any other costs excluded from calculation?
FUNDING SOURCES
I. Funding Agencies
a. National Prison Service/Department of JusticeWhat amount or percent of healthcare expenditures in prisons is allocated by prison services/justice departments?
b. National Health ServicesWhat amount or percent of healthcare expenditures in prisons is allocated by national health services?
c. OtherAre there any other systems of financing prison healthcare in your country (e.g., private insurance)?

Prison healthcare expenditure reporting checklist.

Limitations

Using percentage allocations of overall operating expenditure allocated to healthcare does not necessarily allow for cross-country comparison. For example, Australia and Scotland made similar allocations, of ~9% (9, 10). However, due to the different descriptions of services provided, it is unclear whether the two countries provide equivalent healthcare services for prisoners. Some country estimates were based on limited data. For example, calculations for the US and Canada were limited by exclusion of federal prisons, constituting 19.9% of Canadian adult institutions and 7.9% of combined American state and federal institutions (13). There were variations in American prisons with regard to sources of funding, which may have underestimated costs in some states. For example, inpatient hospitalization costs were being met by insurance companies in some cases, but borne by the prison directly in others. Similarly, in some states, community mental health services covered some of the cost of prisoner treatment (24).

There are additional sources of information on healthcare services provided in prisons which we have not included in this review, as they do not provide detail on expenditure (16). Future work may look at such reviews of prison healthcare (for non-financial purposes) to provide a more detailed assessment of what services are provided, in conjunction with examining financial reporting.

Statements

Author contributions

SF and SS conceived and designed the experiments. SF and SS performed the experiments. SS analyzed the data. SF, SS, and RC wrote the paper. SF supervised the project.

Funding

SF is funded by the Wellcome Trust (202836/Z/16/Z) and RC is supported by the Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00716/full#supplementary-material

References

Summary

Keywords

prison, custody, detention, costs, expenditure, guidelines, healthcare services

Citation

Sridhar S, Cornish R and Fazel S (2018) The Costs of Healthcare in Prison and Custody: Systematic Review of Current Estimates and Proposed Guidelines for Future Reporting. Front. Psychiatry 9:716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00716

Received

08 October 2018

Accepted

06 December 2018

Published

20 December 2018

Volume

9 - 2018

Edited by

Thomas Nilsson, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Reviewed by

Annette Opitz-Welke, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Peter Andiné, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Seena Fazel

This article was submitted to Forensic Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics