REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry, 11 February 2020

Sec. Psychological Therapies

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993

Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review

  • Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Article metrics

View details

308

Citations

267,9k

Views

39,7k

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

The provision of psychotherapy over distance using technology is a growing market reaching many patients and therefore the risks and benefits need to be known by all psychotherapists whether they themselves practice online or not. This comprehensive review of the main ethical arguments for and against different forms of online psychotherapy aims to enhance discussion of ethical issues in this growing area.

Methods:

A search of three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science) was conducted in August 2019 using a specific search protocol yielding 249 publications.

Results:

Of 24 ethical arguments in favor of online psychotherapy and 32 against, the top five ethical arguments in favor of online psychotherapy were (1) increased access to psychotherapy and service availability and flexibility; (2) therapy benefits and enhanced communication; (3) advantages related to specific client characteristics (e.g. remote location); (4) convenience, satisfaction, acceptance, and increased demand; and (5) economic advantages. The top five ethical arguments against engagement in online psychotherapy were (1) privacy, confidentiality, and security issues; (2) therapist competence and need for special training; (3) communication issues specific to technology; (4) research gaps; and (5) emergency issues.

Conclusions:

The findings may be of help to practitioners in deciding whether to engage in online psychotherapy, and in informing patients about risks and benefits, improving ethical guidelines, and stimulating further ethical discussion. The findings are argumentative and qualitative in nature, and further quantitative research is needed.

Introduction

Technological innovation has led to rapid change in many professions, bringing both benefits and challenges. Since the late 1990s, a growing body of research has addressed issues related to online psychotherapy. To begin, that research focused mainly on the usefulness of online psychotherapy before shifting in emphasis to situations in which online psychotherapy might be used, with a view to evaluating the strengths and shortcomings of this approach (1).

The Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists (2) define telepsychology as “[…] the provision of psychological services using telecommunication technologies […]” (p. 792), which may be synchronous (real-time) or asynchronous, including “[…] telephone, mobile devices, interactive videoconferencing, e-mail, chat, text, and Internet […]” (p. 792). The service can be standalone or an adjunct to traditional psychotherapy. The various terms used to describe such services generally refer to psychotherapy delivered remotely using some form of communication technology. In this review, the term online psychotherapy encompasses all such terminological variants, including telepsychology [see (2)], telepsychiatry [see (1)], online counseling [see (3)], behavioral telehealth, telemental health [see (4)], internet therapy [see (5)], internet counseling, online practice, online therapy, e-therapy, cyber-counseling, cyberpsychology, e-social work [see (6)], and e-mental health [see (7)]. These terms may differ slightly according to professional context or technological modality.

The practice of online psychotherapy reflects the rapid evolution of technology and may include the use of “virtual reality, augmented reality, intelligent wearable devices, and artificial intelligence applications” [(8), p. 125]. As these technologies are still in the early stages of development, they are not included in this review. The present review includes online psychotherapy conducted by psychiatrists, psychologist, and social workers. Nurses are not included because of differences in their education and legal restrictions on the scope of their work.

As a growing number of patients seek online psychotherapy, therapists must consider the related ethical issues (3) and should be able to participate in this ethical discussion (9). For example, one important feature of a thorough process of informed consent is knowledge of risks and benefits in making a fully informed decision (10). One of the main barriers to further implementation of online psychotherapy is the uncertainty around ethical and legal issues (1), which are increasingly addressed in ethical codes of conduct (11).

The aim of this review is to summarize the main ethical arguments for and against the provision of online psychotherapy to further ethical discussion within the relevant professions, and to facilitate the development of comprehensive ethical guidelines to underpin the practice of online psychotherapy. This in turn will help practitioners in deciding to offer this form of psychotherapy and in helping their patients to make a truly informed decision about engaging in online psychotherapy. The present review is not about the quantity or volume of publications in which specific ethical arguments are discussed; rather, our concern was to identify the main ethical arguments to date as a sound basis for future discussion.

Methods

Publications were collected in August 2019 from three databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. These were selected on the basis that the topic relates to medical, psychological, and ethical issues.

To construct the search protocol, the research question was structured in terms of three topics: ethics, psychotherapy, and online. Synonyms and main terms for these three fields were selected, and a search code was constructed for each database (including MeSH terms for PubMed and Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms for PsycINFO); for details, see Full Search Code in Supplemental Material). The search code was validated by an expert librarian at the University of Zurich.

Publication titles and abstracts were screened according to defined selection criteria (for details, see Publication Selection Criteria in Supplemental Material).

The main ethical arguments were extracted from the selected publications by JS, clustering text passages according to main topics. JM read the selected publications independently and clustered the publications under these main categories (Table 1). Disagreements were discussed and resolved.

Table 1

Ethical arguments in favor of online psychotherapy
Increased access, availability and flexibility1–6, 8–23, 25–61, 63–70, 72–81, 83, 84, 86–105, 107–112, 114–229
Therapy benefits and enhancements in communication1–43, 45–49, 51–58, 60, 61, 63–74, 76–79, 81–98, 100–102, 104–109, 111–115, 117, 119–124, 126, 128–158, 160, 161, 163, 165–167, 169–179, 181–188, 190–193, 196, 197, 199–217, 219–237
Client characteristics1–4, 10–25, 27–37, 39–54, 56–61, 64, 66–68, 71, 72, 74, 76–84, 86–107, 110–121, 123, 125–131, 133–140, 142–148, 151, 152, 154–159, 161, 163, 168–172, 175–188, 190–198, 200–205, 207–209, 211–213, 215–217, 219, 222–224, 226, 228, 238
Convenience, satisfaction, acceptance and increased demand1–3, 5, 8, 10–19, 21–35, 37–46, 48, 50–53, 55–57, 63–70, 72–74, 76–78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 88–92, 94–96, 100, 101, 104, 106–108, 111–113, 115, 118, 120–122, 128–130, 132, 134, 135, 137, 139–141, 143, 144, 146–148, 152, 153, 155, 156, 159, 160, 163, 165, 169, 170, 172, 175, 176, 178–180, 184–188, 190–194, 197, 200, 201, 203, 206, 207, 209–213, 215, 217, 219, 223, 224, 226, 231, 235, 236, 238
Economic advantages1, 3–5, 8, 10–16, 18, 20–24, 27–37, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 49, 51–53, 56–58, 64–68, 73–78, 81, 83–88, 90, 91, 93, 96, 101–104, 107, 108, 110–112, 116–124, 126, 128–132, 134–136, 139, 140, 142–152, 154, 161, 162, 164, 165, 169, 170, 173, 175–179, 182–185, 187, 189–193, 197, 200–202, 207, 208, 210, 212–214, 216, 218–224, 226, 228–231, 238
Anonymity and privacy3, 10, 11, 13–16, 18–23, 25, 27, 29–31, 33, 35, 37, 38, 41, 42, 47, 51, 56–58, 61, 64–67, 72, 76–79, 84, 86, 87, 89, 91, 95, 96, 98–101, 103, 105–107, 112, 115, 117, 120, 121, 128, 130, 133–135, 137, 139–141, 144, 146, 148, 149, 152, 155, 156, 158, 159, 163, 169–171, 176, 178–187, 189, 192, 198, 200, 201, 204, 207, 211, 212, 216, 217
Eliminating barriers to engage in psychotherapy3, 5, 10, 12–16, 19–23, 25, 27, 29–33, 35–37, 41–43, 47, 51, 56, 58, 59, 61, 64, 66, 67, 69, 76, 77, 84, 86, 87, 89, 91, 92, 95, 96, 101, 102, 107, 109, 111–113, 117, 121, 128, 130, 132, 134, 135, 139, 140, 154, 156, 158, 159, 161, 163, 169, 170, 173, 176, 179, 181, 184, 185, 189, 194, 195, 197, 204, 213, 216, 217, 219, 224, 238
Therapeutic relationship1, 3, 10–12, 14–16, 19, 20, 22, 23, 29–31, 35, 37–40, 43, 47, 49, 54, 56, 60, 61, 64, 66, 68–70, 72, 74, 78, 84, 85, 91, 94, 102, 107, 113, 117, 119, 121, 122, 124, 128, 133, 137, 139–141, 143, 144, 146, 147, 152, 154, 156, 161, 171, 172, 175–179, 181, 184, 186, 189, 197, 204, 209, 211–213, 215–217, 219, 224
Online teaching and supervision1, 8, 14, 19, 21, 22, 32, 34, 35, 38–40, 42, 43, 45, 47, 48, 51–55, 60, 66–68, 74, 78, 83, 87, 88, 91, 94, 98, 99, 103, 104, 117–119, 130, 131, 134, 147–149, 156, 166, 169, 171, 172, 175–178, 181, 184–187, 191, 193, 200, 203, 204, 207, 211–213, 215, 222, 227, 229, 230, 234, 236, 238
Reducing stigma3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13–16, 19–23, 29, 31–33, 35, 36, 41, 42, 45, 51, 56, 64, 76, 78, 84, 86, 89, 91, 92, 95, 96, 101, 107, 109, 113, 133–136, 139, 140, 155, 156, 163, 171, 178–180, 182, 184, 191, 194, 204, 211, 216, 220, 224
Patient empowerment and increased patient control1, 3–5, 7, 16, 19, 20, 30, 39, 42, 43, 49, 51, 52, 58, 60, 61, 69, 72, 74, 76, 78, 79, 81, 83, 86, 88, 90–92, 100, 104, 107, 113, 128, 132, 147, 156, 157, 169, 171, 177, 178, 184, 185, 187, 193, 196, 200, 204, 207, 208, 211, 216, 218, 219, 224, 238
Worldwide and cross-border psychotherapy7, 12, 13, 19–21, 23, 25–27, 31, 32, 35–37, 45, 48, 50, 51, 57, 58, 61, 70, 76, 89–91, 99–103, 105, 113, 117, 118, 120, 127, 136, 138, 142, 146, 159, 163, 165, 169–171, 175, 176, 178, 181, 185, 200, 202–204, 211, 219
Emergencies1, 3, 5, 12, 15, 19, 23, 25, 30, 33, 36, 37, 39, 42, 48, 49, 54, 57, 58, 61, 64, 69, 76, 80, 87, 91, 92, 97, 103, 104, 111, 113, 117, 126, 128, 132, 134, 139, 143, 148, 159, 168–170, 185, 193, 196, 207, 211, 212, 215, 216, 226
Adaptability of services and personalized care1, 5, 7, 19, 21, 22, 30, 35, 39, 44, 45, 57, 86, 107, 108, 132, 135, 142, 152, 169, 175, 219, 224, 227, 228
Adherence and compliance1, 8, 11, 13, 19, 20, 31, 46, 56, 72, 82, 88, 90, 93, 94, 114, 122, 132, 166, 175–177, 216, 219, 224
Opportunities for research7, 13, 32, 43, 47, 52, 58, 61, 66, 67, 79, 83, 87, 108, 120, 121, 146, 185, 200, 203
Unethical not to provide online psychotherapy29, 48, 52, 67, 103, 142, 155, 158, 159, 205–207, 216, 231
Freedom for therapists17, 29, 49, 50, 67, 96, 107, 169, 187, 197, 200, 216
Enhancing accountability42, 51, 52, 55, 150, 184–186, 204, 207
Protection of the therapist23, 31, 53, 97, 143, 196, 207, 217
Social media7, 26, 40, 54, 103, 155
Diminishing intimacy12, 55, 67, 217
Informed consent56, 57, 72, 117
Prohibition against free market58
Ethical arguments against online psychotherapy
Privacy, confidentiality and security issues1–3, 5–20, 22, 23, 25–39, 41–74, 76–82, 84, 85, 87–105, 107, 108, 110–114, 116, 117, 119–122, 124, 127–134, 137–144, 146–150, 152–155, 157–181, 184–195, 197–201, 203–214, 216–219, 221–223, 225–236, 239–248
Therapists' competence and training1–3, 5, 6, 8–12, 14–16, 18–27, 29–33, 35–39, 41–53, 55–58, 60–74, 76–78, 81, 82, 84, 85, 87, 89–96, 100–105, 107–110, 112–114, 116–122, 124–134, 137–144, 146, 147, 149, 150, 152–167, 169, 170, 172, 174–181, 184, 186–191, 193–197, 200, 203–206, 210–213, 218, 219, 221, 223–229, 232–235, 239–242, 244, 246–248
Communication issues2, 3, 5, 7, 9–17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25–35, 37, 39, 41–48, 51, 52, 55–61, 63–70, 72–74, 76–81, 84–95, 97–103, 105, 107, 111–113, 115–120, 124, 126–132, 134, 136–144, 146–150, 152–159, 164–181, 183–189, 191–193, 195–197, 200, 201, 203, 204, 206–209, 211–213, 216, 217, 219, 223–227, 230, 232–236, 239, 241–244, 247–249
Research gaps1–3, 5–7, 9, 11, 13–19, 22–24, 27–35, 37–39, 41–43, 45–47, 49, 51–61, 64–74, 76–80, 82, 84–92, 96, 98, 100, 103, 104, 107, 111–114, 117–119, 121–124, 127, 128, 130–132, 134, 137, 140–144, 146, 147, 149, 151, 152, 154–158, 164, 169–173, 175–178, 180, 181, 183–185, 187, 189, 191–197, 201, 203, 204, 207, 211–220, 224, 227, 228, 231, 233, 235, 237–239, 241, 244, 245, 249
Emergency issues2, 3, 5, 9–13, 15–19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30–32, 34–37, 41–43, 45, 48, 50–61, 63–77, 79, 80, 84, 88, 89, 91–95, 97, 98, 101–105, 111, 113, 114, 116–120, 124, 126–129, 132–134, 137–140, 143, 144, 146, 148–150, 152–156, 158, 159, 162, 164, 165, 167–169, 174–176, 178–181, 185–187, 189, 191, 192, 195–199, 201, 203, 204, 206–209, 211, 212, 216–219, 223, 225–227, 234, 235, 241–245, 247
Informed consent issues1, 2, 6, 9–12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27–30, 32, 35–37, 41, 43–46, 48, 49, 51–58, 60, 63–67, 69–74, 77, 78, 81, 84, 88, 89, 91, 94, 95, 102–105, 113, 114, 116–121, 124, 127, 129–134, 138–142, 144, 146, 148–150, 153, 155, 158–161, 163–167, 169, 171, 173–175, 178–181, 183, 184, 186, 187, 189, 191, 192, 194, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 204, 206–212, 218, 219, 221, 223–228, 231, 233–235, 241–244, 247, 248
Technological competence1–3, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20, 22–25, 27–32, 35, 37, 41, 43–45, 48–53, 56, 57, 59–71, 73, 74, 78, 80, 81, 87, 89–95, 101, 104, 105, 107–110, 112–114, 116–122, 124, 128–130, 132, 134, 138–142, 144, 146, 147, 150, 152, 153, 155, 156, 159–161, 163, 164, 166, 167, 169, 174–182, 184, 188, 189, 191–193, 197, 200, 201, 203–206, 211–214, 219, 223, 225–227, 229, 230, 232, 234, 239–241, 245–247
Absent or incomplete guidelines1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14–16, 18, 20, 22–24, 28–32, 34–37, 39, 42, 43, 45–50, 52, 53, 55, 57, 59–61, 63–65, 67, 68, 70–75, 77–81, 84–87, 89–91, 93, 94, 96, 97, 100, 102–105, 107, 110, 112, 113, 116, 118, 120–122, 129–131, 134, 136, 137, 140–143, 146–150, 152, 154, 155, 157–159, 161, 165, 169–173, 176, 177, 180, 181, 185, 186, 189, 191, 192, 194–196, 198, 203–205, 207, 212, 213, 216, 217, 223, 224, 226–228, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, 243–245, 247
Legal issues1–4, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23–27, 29–32, 35–37, 41–45, 49–51, 53, 55–59, 61, 64–68, 70, 74–77, 79, 84, 85, 87, 89–94, 96, 97, 102, 105, 107, 108, 111–114, 116–119, 121, 124, 126, 128–131, 134, 136, 137, 140–144, 146, 148–150, 154, 155, 158, 159, 161, 164, 167, 169–171, 173, 176–180, 183, 185, 186, 189, 191, 195, 196, 200, 201, 203, 207, 210–212, 214, 216–219, 221, 223–225, 227, 229, 231, 237, 239, 243–245, 247
Practicing across borders2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 12–20, 22, 23, 25–27, 29–32, 35–37, 41–43, 45, 48–51, 53, 55–59, 61, 64–77, 79, 85, 87, 89–92, 94, 96, 97, 99, 100, 102–105, 109, 113, 114, 116–120, 128–130, 133, 134, 136, 137, 140, 142, 143, 146, 148, 149, 154, 155, 158, 159, 163, 164, 168–171, 173, 174, 176, 180, 181, 183, 185, 186, 189, 191, 195–198, 200, 201, 203, 204, 210–212, 218, 221, 223, 225–227, 229–231, 239, 243–247
Patient characteristics2, 3, 10–13, 15–20, 22, 24, 26, 27, 30–34, 37, 39, 41–45, 48, 51–53, 58, 59, 61, 63, 64, 66–74, 76–78, 80, 81, 84, 87–89, 91, 92, 95, 97, 103–105, 107, 112–114, 117–122, 128, 131–133, 137, 139, 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 153, 155, 156, 158, 159, 163, 168, 169, 174, 176, 177, 179–181, 184, 185, 191–193, 195, 196, 198, 204, 208, 209, 211, 212, 214, 216, 217, 219, 223–226, 235, 236, 238, 239, 248
Technical issues1–3, 10, 11, 13, 16–20, 22, 23, 26, 29–32, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 45–48, 51, 52, 56, 57, 59, 62–67, 69, 71, 73, 76–79, 84, 89–91, 94, 95, 101, 103–105, 111, 113, 114, 116, 117, 119, 120, 127–129, 131–134, 137, 139–142, 144, 147–150, 152, 153, 155, 156, 158, 162–164, 166–169, 171, 174–176, 178, 180, 181, 183, 184, 186, 189–192, 197, 200, 203, 204, 209–213, 217, 219, 223, 225, 226, 232, 235, 236, 239, 243, 244
Payment and insurance issues2, 3, 6–10, 12, 15–17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 29–32, 35–37, 41–43, 45, 48, 53, 55, 58, 59, 64–71, 73–77, 84, 88–91, 94, 95, 99, 100, 105, 113, 114, 116–119, 124, 128, 129, 133, 134, 137, 138, 140–142, 146, 149, 150, 154, 155, 158, 159, 162, 164, 166, 167, 169, 171, 173–177, 179, 180, 188, 191–194, 197, 201, 203, 207, 208, 210, 211, 216–219, 221, 223–225, 230, 239, 241, 243–245, 247
Therapeutic relationship issues1, 3–5, 7, 11–13, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26–28, 30–32, 34, 35, 37, 39, 43–49, 51, 52, 54–56, 58–61, 63–68, 72, 75, 78–81, 84–87, 90, 91, 93, 94, 100, 102–104, 107, 111, 113, 118, 120, 126, 128, 130, 132–134, 136, 139, 141–143, 146, 147, 149, 153, 155, 156, 158, 159, 169, 171, 172, 174, 175, 181, 184–186, 188, 189, 191, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 204, 207–209, 211–213, 217, 230, 233, 239, 245, 248
Availability and access issues1, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18–20, 22, 23, 26, 29, 30, 32, 35, 37–39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 51, 54–58, 60, 61, 64, 65, 67, 69, 73, 74, 77–81, 84, 87–89, 91–93, 95, 101, 103–105, 113, 114, 117–119, 121, 124, 126, 129, 130, 132, 134, 144, 149, 150, 152, 153, 155, 156, 158, 160, 163, 164, 167, 169, 172, 174, 177, 180, 181, 184–189, 191, 193, 195, 199–201, 203, 204, 206, 207, 211–213, 223, 225–227, 234, 235, 238, 239, 241, 242
Identity and verification issues3, 5, 9, 11–13, 16, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 32, 35, 37, 41–43, 45, 47, 51, 55–59, 63–73, 75–77, 79, 84, 89, 91, 92, 95, 96, 98, 100–105, 107, 112, 113, 116, 117, 119–121, 126–129, 134, 137–140, 144, 146, 148–150, 154–156, 158, 159, 162, 164, 169, 171, 172, 177, 179–181, 183, 186, 191, 192, 194, 195, 197–199, 201, 203, 204, 206, 210, 211, 223, 225, 226, 230, 234, 235, 241, 242, 245
Image, tradition and therapists' attitude1, 5, 13, 15–17, 19, 24, 28, 29, 32, 37, 39, 43, 47, 50, 52, 54, 58–60, 66–68, 72–74, 78–80, 82, 84, 89, 91–93, 96–98, 104, 107, 108, 110, 112, 113, 124, 131, 134, 137–139, 142–144, 147, 148, 150, 155, 156, 158, 159, 172, 180, 184–187, 191, 195, 197, 200, 203, 207, 211, 216, 217, 219, 224, 226, 227, 233, 243–245, 249
Misuse and harm12, 15, 18, 19, 23, 29, 30, 33, 37, 41–43, 47, 51, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 64, 70, 72, 74, 78, 81, 84, 85, 87, 89, 94, 95, 101–103, 105, 107, 117, 119, 120, 124, 133, 136, 138, 143, 146, 148–150, 156, 177, 180, 181, 184–186, 195, 200, 203, 223, 239, 244
Boundary issues2, 3, 10, 16, 19, 26, 31, 38, 39, 48, 51, 54, 56–58, 60, 63, 67, 71, 73, 74, 80, 82, 88, 89, 93, 95, 103, 113, 120, 124, 126, 130, 133, 134, 136, 143, 155, 156, 160, 172, 174, 177–179, 188, 189, 191, 192, 206, 211, 223, 225–228, 236, 239, 242
Comparability to in-person treatment1–3, 7, 14, 16, 19, 29, 30, 32, 33, 39, 42–44, 46, 56, 57, 64, 66, 67, 70, 72, 76, 80, 81, 84, 86, 90, 91, 104, 111–114, 117–119, 126, 134, 136, 155, 159, 179, 191, 192, 195, 198, 201, 203, 204, 221, 226, 233, 244, 245, 247, 249
Increased costs1, 3, 9, 12, 16, 21, 23, 32–34, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 49, 51–53, 58, 61, 64, 65, 68, 83, 87, 89, 91, 97, 99, 101, 128, 129, 132, 143, 144, 147, 154, 159, 162, 169, 171, 180, 201–204, 207, 213, 214, 219, 223, 229, 231, 239, 248
Increased liability and litigation3, 15, 22, 23, 29, 32, 35–37, 42, 52, 57, 59, 67, 68, 70, 74, 77, 80, 89, 92, 94, 96, 97, 113, 124, 126, 129, 130, 134, 142–144, 158, 164, 165, 169, 180, 181, 183, 189, 194–198, 201, 207, 218, 231, 233, 243, 245
Negative influence of technology use5, 7, 10, 20, 47, 54–56, 60, 61, 64, 66, 67, 69, 72, 84–86, 95, 98, 108, 109, 115, 121, 128, 133, 134, 137, 140, 152, 157, 158, 166, 169, 172, 179, 181, 203, 211, 216, 217, 223, 237, 249
Social media2, 3, 10, 18, 26, 48, 54, 57, 60, 63, 69, 71, 93, 103, 105, 113, 120, 130, 134, 155, 157, 160, 164, 172, 174, 188, 189, 205, 206, 211, 223, 226, 227, 242, 247
Financial gain9, 23, 25, 27, 30, 44, 45, 49, 58, 59, 72, 76, 81, 85, 90, 92, 100, 102, 103, 117, 120, 126, 130, 144, 164, 169, 180, 186, 189, 208, 224, 226, 241
Loss of therapeutic control16, 17, 26, 28, 41, 45, 48, 57, 60, 63, 73, 80, 86, 124, 126, 130, 134, 138, 164, 166, 181, 196, 207, 208, 211, 217, 247
Adherence issues10, 11, 16, 20, 41, 69, 75, 87, 101, 103, 132, 152, 154, 156, 165, 169, 187, 191, 196, 208, 211
Online supervision and teaching issues2, 19, 54, 66, 116, 126, 157, 159, 186, 226, 236, 239
Dependence and loss of control by the patient48, 58, 88, 107, 177, 206, 207, 216, 219
Autonomy issues28, 45, 48, 60, 81, 132, 134
Dehumanization15, 28, 68, 89, 90, 178
Stigmatization29, 91, 113, 138

Ethical arguments in favor and against online psychotherapy.

The publications are depicted in numbers (for full citation, see References).

Results

The collection of publications in August 2019 in the three databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science and selection according to the selection criteria resulted in a final sample of 249 publications.

The final sample (n = 249) included 179 articles, 6 books, 55 book chapters, 2 doctoral theses, 5 book reviews, 1 brief communication, and 1 item of correspondence. Among these, there were 32 literature reviews, 2 systematic reviews (regarding the socioeconomic impact of telehealth and guidelines in videoconferencing), 6 editorials or introductions, 5 book reviews, and 6 books (including 4 practice guides). Additionally, there was one case study, one correspondence, one research digest, one discussion, and one paper on ethical reasoning. In total, 30 of the selected publications were empirical studies, including 14 surveys and 6 website analyses. Six related to specific mental illnesses, one was a comparison of in-person and online psychotherapy, two included practitioner interviews, one was a study protocol for a meta-analysis, and one related to a practitioner discussion forum. Among other notable features of the final sample, 18 included guidelines, and 25 focused on specific countries.

The selected publications ranged across disciplines that included psychology (70), psychiatry (33), psychology and psychiatry (2), social work (12), and telemedicine (6). The remaining publications (125) related to psychotherapy in general, with no specific disciplinary focus. In terms of technological modality, these included email (13), telephone (5), videoconferencing (28), text-based methods including email and chat (14), email and text messages via cellphone (3), mobile phones (3), text messages (1), email and social media (2), and videoconferencing and mobile phones (6). The remaining 173 related to communication technologies in general rather than any specific technology or mode of communication.

Table 1 summarizes the main ethical arguments (24 pro and 32 contra) extracted from the final 249 publications, organized by number of mentions. The next section describes the various categories. For clarity, the summary does not include all discussion points, and reference is made to only one publication for each ethical argument. For further information about the arguments, readers are referred to the source (Table 1).

Ethical Arguments in Favor of Online Psychotherapy

Increased Access, Availability, and Flexibility

Online psychotherapy can improve and enhance access to health care services and evidence-based care, especially for those living in rural or remote areas and populations that are underserved for other reasons [see (12)]. Services can be accessed anywhere and at any time, allowing greater flexibility [see (13)]. This is advantageous for both therapist and patient, enabling immediate and timely care [see (3)]. Online psychotherapy may also facilitate more frequent contact between patient and therapist [see (14)], and as more therapists are available to the patient, specialist care is easier to access, and the range of services is wider [see (1)].

Therapy Benefits and Enhancements in Communication

According to a growing number of favorable research findings, online psychotherapy can be as efficient, effective, and efficacious as traditional therapy (or more so) [see (1)]. Multiple therapeutic orientations and modalities are translated into online communication, but cognitive behavioral approaches seem to be most appropriate or the easiest to transfer [see (15)]. For example, during an in vivo exposure, the therapist could be virtually present [see (16)]. However, also other psychotherapeutic orientations such as psychoanalysis assess and discuss ethical issues of practicing online [see (17)]. Online psychotherapy offers a viable alternative to in-person treatment but can also be used as a supplement or adjunct [see (18)]. This affords new opportunities for creative approaches involving different models of therapy and technological modalities, and additional online material (websites, videos, etc.) are easily integrated into therapy [see (19)]. Data recording and documentation of the online therapeutic process is also easier, allowing treatment, treatment stages, and therapeutic techniques used by therapist and patient to be revisited [see (20)].

Client Characteristics

Online psychotherapy can be especially useful for clients living in geographically remote, rural, or otherwise underserved areas where few or no therapists are available [see (21)], as well as for homebound or mobility-impaired patients [see (22)]. Access to traditional in-person services may be limited by the psychiatric condition itself, as in cases of agoraphobia, anxiety, or other illnesses that restrict physical encounter, and online psychotherapy again offers a possible solution [see (23)]. Online psychotherapy seems especially appropriate for patients with mild or moderate symptoms [see (24)], but might also be a viable tool for patient in acute crisis with no possibility for immediate in-person care [see (25)].

Convenience, Satisfaction, Acceptance, and Increased Demand

Online psychotherapy is perceived as convenient and comfortable by patients and therapists alike [see (26)], not least because of the greater flexibility it offers in terms of location and time [see (27)]. Online services have gained increasing acceptance among patients and therapists [see (28)], who express satisfaction with this approach [see (15)]. Unsurprisingly, then, demand and interest is on the increase among both patients and practitioners [see (29)].

Economic Advantages

Online psychotherapy is reported to be more cost-efficient [see (30)], with the potential to reduce healthcare costs for patients, therapists, and society as a whole [see (31)]. As a single therapist can reach more patients, especially in underserved populations [see (32)], long waiting lists for face-to-face treatment can be reduced [see (33)], offering a possible solution to the workforce shortage in mental health provision [see (34)]. Online psychotherapy might pose a solution to an undersupply in mental health care in various regions of the world, especially in low- and middle income or developing countries, for example, in India [see (34)].

Anonymity and Privacy

Because online psychotherapy can be provided anonymously and one is not seen entering the therapist's office [see (20)], it can enhance the patient's sense of anonymity and privacy [see (13)]. Perceived or actual anonymity may lead in turn to reduced inhibition and greater openness in discussing emotional topics [see (35)].

Eliminating Barriers to Engagement

By reducing or eliminating barriers such as fear of social stigma, online psychotherapy can reach patients who might never have sought traditional in-person therapy [see (36)]. This might serve as an entry point to the mental health system, including traditional in-person therapy as a possible next step [see (37)].

Therapeutic Relationship

The therapeutic relationship established in online psychotherapy is commonly perceived as equal to or better than in-person therapy, and an established therapeutic relationship can be enhanced using online communication [see (38)].

Online Teaching and Supervision

Technology-mediated communication can contribute positively to teaching and supervision and facilitates inter-professional and inter-collegial exchange worldwide [see (39)]. Online psychotherapy conducted by email or other text-based communication automatically generates a record of the sessions [see (32)], and a videoconferencing approach enables sessions to be videotaped [see (40)] for later supervision.

Reducing Stigma

Any stigma, stigmatization, or perceived stigma associated with seeking mental help services or concerns about being stereotyped can be reduced or eliminated by online psychotherapy. This may in turn help to address barriers to traditional psychotherapy such as concerns about anonymity and privacy [see (41)].

Patient Empowerment and Increased Patient Control

Online psychotherapy empowers the patient because, for example, it is much easier to move to another therapist [see (42)], giving the patient more control over their therapy [see (43)]. This reconfigures the balance of power between therapist and patient, making the interaction more collaborative [see (20)].

Worldwide and Cross-Border Psychotherapy

Online psychotherapy can be provided from anywhere, without regard to geographical boundaries, state lines, national borders, or time-zones, allowing therapists to reach patients who are, for instance, temporarily abroad [see (19)].

Emergencies

Online psychotherapy can be useful for emergencies and crisis interventions. As compared to traditional in-person therapy, it may provide more immediate access to services, and disclosure of suicidal or homicidal tendencies may be easier online [see (19)]. In the context of crisis and suicide prevention, suicide hotlines and other forms of telephone emergency care are long established and proven practices [see (37)].

Adaptability of Services and Personalized Care

Online psychotherapy can offer services that specifically match patients' needs [see (19)], facilitating genuinely patient-centered care [see (44)] and individualized treatment and technology options [see (45)].

Adherence and Compliance

Levels of adherence, attendance, and compliance as good as or better than in-person treatment can be achieved using online psychotherapy [see (46)].

Opportunities for Research

Online psychotherapy offers unique opportunities for research [see (32)]; for example, email-based therapy automatically creates a written record, which can be used for research purposes [see (47)].

Unethical Not to Provide Online Psychotherapy

Failure to provide online psychotherapy to vulnerable people who need it can be seen as unethical—for example, patients living in rural or remote areas with few or occasional local options [see (48)].

Freedom for Therapists

Online psychotherapy can afford the therapist greater freedom [see (49)], including more professional opportunities and a better balance between professional and private life [see (50)].

Enhancing Accountability

Online psychotherapy increases the accountability of both therapist and patient, not least because it is easier to keep records and to make transcripts available to both parties [see (51)], reducing the potential for malpractice and litigation [see (52)].

Protection of the Therapist

Security issues raised by risky environments or when communicating with potentially dangerous patients can be reduced by online service provision [see (53)].

Social Media

Offering unprecedented opportunities for access and connecting with patients and other therapists, social media can be a useful therapeutic tool [see (54)].

Diminishing Intimacy

As the distance provided by technology inhibits physical proximity, online psychotherapy can help to reduce the risk of patient-therapist (sexual) intimacy [see (55)].

Informed Consent

The informed consent process can be enhanced by online communication—for example, web pages can be revisited (56), with links to additional information resources or technical material and translation into different languages [see (57)].

Prohibition Against Free Market

The view that one should not engage in online psychotherapy is legally problematic because it restricts trade and the ethical right to a free market (58).

Ethical Arguments Against Online Psychotherapy

Privacy, Confidentiality, and Security Issues

Among concerns about privacy, confidentiality, security, and safety in online psychotherapy [see (59)], one relates to the use of unsecured websites or unencrypted communication tools, like commercially available software [see (60)] that is easily hacked [see (61)]. Data security may also be compromised when technology fails [see (62)], with potential breaches of confidentiality that might extend beyond the therapist's control [see (63)].

Therapist Competence and Training

To provide online psychotherapy, training is needed to ensure appropriate technology-related competences, as well as clinical and therapeutic competences specific to the online setting. In particular, the therapist would require knowledge of ethical approaches and guidelines, as well as specific legal requirements and policies [see (18)]. In general, therapeutic skills in in-person contact do not automatically translate into online therapeutic skills [see (32)]. At present, standards are not well defined, and there are few training or education programs for online psychotherapy, which is not included in most traditional curricula [see (64)]. In relation to working remotely with patients in other countries, the therapist would need to be familiar with international laws and legal requirements in the patient's jurisdiction, and additional cultural competences might also be required [see (65)].

Communication Issues

Among negative issues, one of the most widely discussed is the absence of non-verbal cues in the therapeutic interaction, especially when using text-based media but also when using telephone or videoconferencing, which may lead to misunderstandings and miscommunication [see (20)]. If a therapist were to miss some important item of clinical information, the whole diagnostic process and psychological assessment could be impaired [see (28)]. The use of e-mail in this context can undermine the conversation in terms of time lag and lack of spontaneity, and it may prove difficult to express empathy, warmth, and feelings [see (64)]. For these reasons, online psychotherapy may not be appropriate for all therapeutic approaches and modalities [see (66)].

Research Gaps

Many authors claim that there is insufficient research in support of online psychotherapy or that there are too many knowledge gaps, especially with regard to effectiveness, efficacy, and long-term outcomes and as compared to in-person treatment [see (30)].

Emergency Issues

Questions also arise as to whether an emergency or crisis situation involving threat to self or others can be detected and addressed where patient and therapist are at different locations [see (67)]. Other ethical issues regarding emergency or crisis situations include verification of patient identity and location [see (68)], technological difficulties [see (69)], and cross-border practice [see (70)].

Informed Consent Issues

In light of the many differences from in-person therapy (e.g. technical, legal), online psychotherapy requires a particular form of informed consent [see (71)]. However, it might be difficult to determine whether the patient is legally able to give consent or to assess their mental capacity to do so [see (72)].

Technological Competence

A therapist's lack of technological competence and patient and therapist awareness of their respective skills are important issues in this context, as discomfort or fear of using technology is not uncommon [see (73)].

Absent or Incomplete Guidelines

Regulatory guidelines and standards of practice or care in this area are considered incomplete or absent. Guidance by legal or regulatory bodies is also lacking, especially in terms of global or international regulation of cross-border practice, and the absence of specific ethical guidelines or codes of conduct for online psychotherapy leaves many ethical questions unanswered [see (42)].

Legal Issues

Unresolved jurisdiction and few or no specific laws governing licensing, certification, training and education, informed consent, and cross-border practice are problematic issues for online psychotherapy [see (74)].

Practicing Across Borders

Many issues arise in relation to online psychotherapy conducted across state or national borders, including legislative, licensing, and cultural differences [see (30)]. For instance, it may be unclear whether the therapy is seen to take place at the patient's or the therapist's location, raising such questions as which jurisdiction is responsible when a problem arises or which regulates professional practice in the event of a violation [see (75)]. The therapist may not even know or cannot be sure where the patient is located, especially if they choose to remain anonymous [see (76)]. Cultural differences between patient and therapist might influence the communication itself by different cultural behaviors or language use resulting in different interpretations of the behavior and potential misunderstandings [see (30)].

Patient Characteristics

Online psychotherapy may not be suitable for all patients, clinical conditions, psychiatric disorders, and problems; it may sometimes be contraindicated, especially in the case of severe mental disorder, or for patients who are highly dysfunctional and/or pose a threat to themselves or others [see (16)]. A patient's inability, diminished competence, or discomfort when using technology might also be considered a barrier [see (15)].

Technical Issues

Technical difficulties and failures are major concerns in this context, possibly leading to frustration and anger, which may be distracting or disturbing [see (73)].

Payment and Insurance Issues

Payment, reimbursement, fee structure, and billing for online psychotherapy raise many questions, such as how interruption or technical failure will be handled [see (77)]. Another important issue is whether insurers will cover online psychotherapy in general, as well as instances of malpractice or liability, which may become especially complicated across state or national borders [see (68)].

Therapeutic Relationship Issues

Many authors have questioned whether an effective and successful therapeutic alliance can be developed solely through technology [see (78)] and whether the well-known benefits of the therapeutic relationship might disappear or diminish in online psychotherapy [see (79)]. Other issues raised in this include absence of non-verbal cues and lack of intimacy [see (51)].

Availability and Access Issues

Because technology often creates a sense of permanent access, this may become a problem, as the therapist cannot and will not guarantee this [see (60)]. Response time and delays are also an important issue, especially in emergency situations [see (80)]. Additionally, accessibility (for instance, in terms of technology, devices, connectivity, and applications) may be restricted for people of lower socioeconomic status or for those unable to use the equipment [see (32)].

Identity and Verification Issues

As it may be difficult to verify the identity of the patient (or the therapist) online, deception or fraud is a possibility—for example, a therapist might inadvertently treat a minor without parental consent [see (64)].

Image, Tradition, and Therapist Attitude

Many therapists have a negative view of online psychotherapy and are clearly concerned or strictly against it, with poor reported satisfaction and acceptance among therapists [see (1)] and concerns that online psychotherapy might damage the profession's image [see (58)].

Misuse and Harm

Unethical, malign, or abusive behavior may be easier online [see (81)]—for instance, practicing without a license or without appropriate training, or even pretending to be a therapist [see (23)].

Boundary Issues

Online psychotherapy may make it more difficult to maintain professional boundaries, posing a threat to the professional relationship—for example, an interaction mediated by technology might seem social, conversational, or less formal, and the flexibility of location and time might lead to communication in inappropriate locations or at odd times, as the therapist might be tempted to communicate while on holidays, traveling, or while ill [see (26)]. As another potential threat to boundaries, therapists and/or patients might use search engines to explore private information [see (82)].

Comparability to In-Person Treatment

One important open question is whether online psychotherapy is truly comparable to in-person treatment, and whether it can replace traditional in-person therapy. Many authors have expressed doubts in this regard, to the extent that some believe online services may prevent patients from seeking more suitable traditional therapy [see (56)].

Costs

Online psychotherapy entails some initial costs for the therapist, which may make access to online psychotherapy services too expensive for some patients [see (68)]. These initial costs could make it difficult to implement online psychotherapy in some low-income and developing countries [see (83)].

Increased Liability and Litigation

Therapists who provide an online service may be more exposed to litigation and increased liability, as for example in cross-border cases [see (29)].

Negative Influence of Technology Use

Online psychotherapy may contribute to internet overuse and ultimately internet addiction [see (47)], potentially increasing social isolation [see (84)] and exposure to unregulated and misleading health-related or other information [see (85)].

Social Media

The use of social networking sites poses new ethical challenges and invites potentially unethical interactions in the context of online psychotherapy, such as friend requests from patients [see (57)] or problematic self-disclosure [see (18)].

Financial Gain

There is a danger that online psychotherapy might be conducted for financial gain without due regard to the best interests of the patient [see (27)].

Loss of Therapeutic Control

Online psychotherapy may risk loss of therapeutic control [see (86)]—for example, in relation to the patient's location [see (57)].

Adherence Issues

Compliance and adherence to therapy may be undermined in an online setting, given the ease of dropping out, logging off, hanging up the phone, or terminating the connection [see (87)].

Online Supervision and Teaching Issues

Supervising and teaching online raises a number of specific ethical issues and questions [see (66)].

Patient Dependence and Loss of Control

In online psychotherapy, the patient may experience less control (58), and the process may foster dependence [see (88)].

Autonomy Issues

Online psychotherapy may hamper patient autonomy [see (28)]—for example, a patient may experience a sense of intrusion when receiving online psychotherapy at home [see (81)].

Dehumanization

Online psychotherapy may lead to dehumanization of the therapeutic environment [see (89)] or of the patient if experienced as intrusive by someone who is already vulnerable [see (90)].

Stigmatization

An online setting may promote inadvertent discrimination or cultural insensitivity by masking important cues [see (91)].

Discussion

Online psychotherapy offers many advantages like benefits for the therapeutic process and the therapeutic communication itself, also by being more convenient than traditional settings of psychotherapy. Both many patients and therapists seem to be satisfied with the use of online psychotherapy. Not surprisingly, this kind of psychotherapy is increasingly being used. Online psychotherapy promises to solve economic pressures by being more cost-effective, offering a solution for workforce shortage problems and increasing access to necessary psychotherapy for many different populations suffering from mental health problems who might be difficult to reach such as patients living in rural areas. Reducing barriers to engaging in psychotherapy by reducing stigma, being able to attend online sessions anonymously thus enhancing a sense of privacy, reaching patients worldwide and across borders are other advantages of online psychotherapy. Conducting psychotherapy online gives the possibility to adapt services to specific patients offering more personalized care, enhancing patient control, and empowering the patient resulting in more adherence to and compliance with the treatment itself. The specific setting of online psychotherapy gives the therapist more freedom and offers physical protection, but might also protect the patient from breaches of intimacy boundaries and enhance the accountability of both patient and therapist. Additionally, online psychotherapy offers new opportunities for research, teaching, and supervision, enhancing the informed consent process, offering new opportunities through the use of social media and might give good assistance in emergency situations. Online psychotherapy might even improve and extend the therapeutic relationship.

One of the biggest and most discussed disadvantages of using psychotherapy is the risks with regard to privacy, confidentiality, and data security. Online psychotherapy creates new challenges to therapist competences which brings about the need for new forms of training and education, especially technological competences regarding many technical issues that might occur. Technological competence is not only needed by the therapist, but also by the patient. New communication skills are needed and particular attention must be paid to the development of the therapeutic relationship regarding the many boundary issues that might occur. Difficulties herein are put up by new access and availability issues and the loss of therapeutic control. Broader research, new guidelines, and a consideration of legal issues in general are needed especially regarding the practice across borders of nations, new payment and insurance issues, challenges to the informed consent process, dealing with emergency situations, enhancing the identification process of the therapist and the patient, and selecting patients that are suitable for online psychotherapy. The comparability to in-person treatment might be questioned and some fear danger to the image of psychotherapy. Therapists might fear increased liability and litigation. Online, new forms of misuse are possible and charlatans might utilize this kind of psychotherapy to achieve financial gains. Other feared disadvantages of online psychotherapy are the dehumanization and stigmatization of patients, patient dependence, and loss of patients' autonomy. New adherence issues might occur regarding the ease of ending an online session. Online supervision and teaching and the use of social media raise further ethical questions. Extensive costs might be faced by patient and therapists, when using online psychotherapy, for example, to set up the new technologies. Last but not least, the negative influence of technology itself might endanger its users.

This review has a number of limitations. First, only articles in English and German were included. However, only fourteen of the articles that were found to meet the search criteria were in a different language and therefore excluded. Among the emerging research topics not included in this review are online training and supervision, social media, avatar, second life, robots and bots, artificial intelligence, computer-mediated (self-help) therapy, psychology-related smartphone apps, internet-based group therapy and telecare, online forums, open chat, therapy for older adults, therapy for children and adolescents, and marriage and family therapy.

It is beyond the scope of the present review to offer exhaustive recommendations for clinical practice or how these ethical risks might be resolved in practice, and further systematic research should more fully address this topic. For some recommendations directly deducted from the results of this review, see Table 2.

Table 2

  • Thorough protection of privacy of the patient, ensuring confidentiality, and security

  • Engaging in special training and establishing special competence needed when conducting online psychotherapy, such as technological competences

  • Being aware of communication challenges of the respective medium used, such as missing of non-verbal cues when using email

  • Preparing for emergencies, for example, by establishing emergency plans, and being prepared to contact a local professional being able to intervene if necessary

  • Being aware and reassure the true identity, age, and location of the patient

  • Giving the patient the opportunity to reassure the true identity of the therapist and his/her certifications

  • Set up an exhaustive informed consent form and thoroughly discuss all the risks and benefits with the patient in order to enable her/him to make a truly informed decision about engaging in online psychotherapy

  • Clarifying fee and insurance issues

  • Being aware of boundary issues with regard to the establishment and maintenance of a professional therapeutic relationship online

  • Offering adequate anonymity and privacy to help eliminating barriers in engaging in psychotherapy

  • Adapt services to the particular needs of the patient, thus offering personalized care whenever possible

  • Be open toward further research on online psychotherapy, especially in cross-border online psychotherapy

  • Support and welcome the establishment of new guidelines for conducting ethical online psychotherapy

Recommendations for practice.

Counting the frequency of arguments does not clarify their relative importance; to evaluate their true weight, a more quantitative survey of experts' ratings is needed. Without that deeper understanding, the risks and benefits reviewed here remain anecdotal and qualitative, with only limited validity (92).

In future systematic research on efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency of online psychotherapy is needed and practice guidelines, legal and ethical frameworks need to be developed. Further research in the fast growing field of online psychotherapy seems vital. Some important topics requiring further investigation are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3

  • Systematic research on the efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and comparability of online psychotherapy to in-person psychotherapy regarding different technologies, different mental disorders, and severity of symptoms

  • Translatability of different therapeutic orientations in online psychotherapy by assessing efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and comparability to the in-person setting, alterations needed, and suitability of different technologies for the respective therapeutic orientation

  • Possibility and applicability of certain clinical practices like online prescription, diagnosis, assessment of suicidality or homicidality, assessing decision-making capacity for informed consent regarding the usage of different technologies

  • Assessing which client characteristics are suitable for online psychotherapy and which are contraindicated, also regarding different technology use like video-conferencing or e-mail, as standalone or adjunct to in-person sessions, particular handling of homicidal or suicidal patients

  • Research regarding cross-border, worldwide, and cross-cultural practice by assessing legal issues, influence of cultural factors, language and communication difficulties, patient-therapist fit, malpractice, payment and insurance issues, acquirement of special competences

  • Assessing the changes in the therapeutic relationship due to different communication technologies used in online psychotherapy and the new forms of abuse that might appear or be possible in online psychotherapy compared to in-person psychotherapy

  • Research on additional skills needed by psychotherapists in the online setting compared to the in-person setting, assessing the questions who might be suitable to become an online psychotherapist, who might train them, and what kind of education programs might be suitable in which form

  • Data security issues assessing secure ways of communication using different technologies, also regarding secure data storage and secure online payment

Recommendations for future research in online psychotherapy.

Conclusion

If trained psychotherapists choose not to participate in the new and emerging field of online psychotherapy, it seems likely that charlatans will emerge to meet the ever-growing demand, perhaps driving professional psychotherapists out of the market (37). For that reason, psychotherapists from all professional backgrounds must be properly informed about the risks and benefits of online psychotherapy if they are to make well-informed decisions and act in the best interests of their patients. Even if they decide not to offer such services themselves, they should be equipped to provide information about online psychotherapy that enables patients to make a well-considered decision about using such services.

Statements

Author contributions

JS and MT designed the review and developed the search strategy. JS and JM were involved in search, exclusion, and argument extraction processes. JS and MT wrote and edited the final article, which was reviewed and approved by JM.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Sabine Klein, expert librarian at the University of Zurich, who reviewed the final search code and provided many useful inputs, and to Jörg Zemp, librarian at the Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, who assisted us in locating the full-text publications that were not directly available.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    ChakrabartiS. Usefulness of telepsychiatry: A critical evaluation of videoconferencing-based approaches. World J Psychiatry (2015) 5(3):286–304. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.286

  • 2

    Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. Am Psychol68(9):791–800. doi: 10.1037/a0035001

  • 3

    CipollettaSMocellinD. Online counseling: An exploratory survey of Italian psychologists' attitudes towards new ways of interaction. Psychother Res (2017) 28:1–16. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1259533

  • 4

    ComerJS. Introduction to the special series: Applying new technologies to extend the scope and accessibility of mental health care. Cogn Behav Pract (2015) 22(3):253–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.04.002

  • 5

    CoyleDDohertyGMatthewsMSharryJ. Computers in talk-based mental health interventions. Interact Comput (2007) 19(4):545–62. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.02.001

  • 6

    FinnJSchoechD. Introduction. J Technol In Hum Serv (2008) 26(2/4):105–8. doi: 10.1080/15228830802061428

  • 7

    JormAFMorganAJMalhiGS. The future of e-mental health. Aust New Z J Psychiatry (2013) 47(2):104–6. doi: 10.1177/0004867412474076

  • 8

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Conclusion. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner"s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016b). p. 121–6.

  • 9

    FisherCBFriedAL. Internet-mediated psychological services and the American Psychological Association Ethics Code. Psychother: Theory Res Pract Training (2003) 40(1/2):103–11. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.103

  • 10

    WellsSYWilliamsKWalterKHMorenoLButlerEGlassmanLHet al. The informed consent process for therapeutic communication in clinical videoconferencing. In: TuerkPWShoreP, editors. Clinical videoconferencing in telehealth: Program development and practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (2015). p. 133–66.

  • 11

    AbbottJ-AMKleinBCiechomskiL. Best practices in online therapy. J Technol In Hum Serv (2008) 26(2/4):360–75. doi: 10.1080/15228830802097257

  • 12

    ZurO. Telehealth and the technology for delivering care. In: ZurO, editor. Boundaries in psychotherapy: Ethical and clinical explorations. Washington, DC, US; American Psychological Association (2007). p. 133–46.

  • 13

    ChesterAGlassCA. Online counselling: A descriptive analysis of therapy services on the Internet. Br J Guid Couns (2006) 34(2):145–60. doi: 10.1080/03069880600583170

  • 14

    WodarskiJFrimpongJ. Application of e-therapy programs to the social work practice. J Hum Behav In Soc Environ (2013) 23(1):29–36. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2013.737290

  • 15

    PerleJGLangsamLCNierenbergB. Controversy clarified: An updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health. Clin Psychol Rev (2011) 31(8):1247–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.08.003

  • 16

    BrenesGAIngramCWDanhauerSC. Benefits and challenges of conducting psychotherapy by telephone. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):543–9. doi: 10.1037/a0026135

  • 17

    ScharffJS. Technology-assisted psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc (2013) 61(3):491–509. doi: 10.1177/0003065113485423

  • 18

    JohnsonGR. Toward uniform competency standards in telepsychology: A proposed framework for Canadian psychologists. Can Psychol/Psychol Can (2014) 55(4):291–302. doi: 10.1037/a0038002

  • 19

    FenichelMSulerJBarakAZelvinEJonesGMunroKet al. Myths and realities of online clinical work. CyberPsychol Behav (2002) 5(5):481–97. doi: 10.1089/109493102761022904

  • 20

    BaumanSRiversI. Mental health in the digital age. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan (2015).

  • 21

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Concepts, principles, and benefits of telemental health. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner"s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016a). p. 9–16.

  • 22

    GodineNBarnettJE. The use of telepsychology in clinical practice: Benefits, effectiveness, and issues to consider. Int J Cyber Behav Psychol Learn (2013) 3(4):70–83. doi: 10.4018/ijcbpl.2013100105

  • 23

    FitzgeraldTDHunterPVHadjistavropoulosTKoocherGP. Ethical and legal considerations for Internet-based psychotherapy. Cogn Behav Ther (2010) 39(3):173–87. doi: 10.1080/16506071003636046

  • 24

    GunSYTitovNAndrewsG. Acceptability of Internet treatment of anxiety and depression. Australas Psychiatry (2011) 19(3):259–64. doi: 10.3109/10398562.2011.562295

  • 25

    HaasLJMaloufJL. Keeping up the good work: A practitioner"s guide to mental health ethics. Sarasota, FL, US; Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange (2002).

  • 26

    DrumKBLittletonHL. Therapeutic boundaries in telepsychology: Unique issues and best practice recommendations. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2014) 45(5):309–15. doi: 10.1037/a0036127

  • 27

    MontaltoM. The ethical implications of using technology in psychological testing and treatment. Ethical Hum Psychol Psychiatry: Int J Crit Inq (2014) 16(2):127–36. doi: 10.1891/1559-4343.16.2.127

  • 28

    Van WynsbergheAGastmansC. Telepsychiatry and the meaning of in-person contact: A preliminary ethical appraisal. Med Health Care Philos (2009) 12(4):469–76. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9214-y

  • 29

    HolmesK. Ethical practice online: An exploration of provider liability risk among practitioners in the emerging field of online therapy. Doctor of Philosophy: Capella University (2008a).

  • 30

    BarnettJEScheetzK. Technological advances and telehealth: Ethics, law, and the practice of psychotherapy. Psychother: Theory Res Pract Training (2003) 40(1/2):86–93. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.86

  • 31

    MorlandLAPoiznerJMWilliamsKEMasinoTTThorpSR. Home-based clinical video teleconferencing care: Clinical considerations and future directions. Int Rev Psychiatry (2015) 27(6):504–12. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1082986

  • 32

    MallenMJVogelDLRochlenAB. The practical aspects of online counseling: Ethics, training, technology, and competency. Couns Psychol (2005) 33(6):776–818. doi: 10.1177/0011000005278625

  • 33

    ProudfootJG. Computer-based treatment for anxiety and depression: Is it feasible? Is it effective?Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2004) 28(3):353–63. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.008

  • 34

    MalhotraSChakrabartiSShahR. Telepsychiatry: Promise, potential, and challenges. Indian J Psychiatry (2013) 55(1):3–11. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.105499

  • 35

    FraserL. Etherapy: Ethical and clinical considerations for Version 7 of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health's Standards of Care. Int J Transgenderism (2009) 11(4):247–63. doi: 10.1080/15532730903439492

  • 36

    KramerGMMishkindMCLuxtonDDShoreJH. Managing risk and protecting privacy in telemental health: An overview of legal, regulatory, and risk-management issues. In: MyersKTurveyCL, editors. Telemental health: Clinical, technical, and administrative foundations for evidence-based practice. Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands (2013). p. 83–107.

  • 37

    RummellCMJoyceNR. “So wat do u want to wrk on 2day?”: The ethical implications of online counseling. Ethics Behav (2010) 20(6):482–96. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2010.521450

  • 38

    MishnaFFantusSMcInroyLB. Informal use of information and communication technology: Adjunct to traditional face-to-face social work practice. Clin Soc Work J (2017) 45(1):49–55. doi: 10.1007/s10615-016-0576-3

  • 39

    CraigSLLorenzoMVC. Can information and communication technologies support patient engagement? A review of opportunities and challenges in health social work. Soc Work In Health Care (2014) 53(9):845–64. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.936991

  • 40

    SimpsonSRichardsonLKPellingN. Introduction to the special issue “Telepsychology: Research and practice”. Aust Psychol (2015) 50(4):249–51. doi: 10.1111/ap.12146

  • 41

    SmileyPAVandeCreekL. Problems and solutions with online therapy. In: VandeCreekLAllenJB, editors. Innovations in clinical practice: Focus on health & wellness. Sarasota, FL, US: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange (2005). p. 187–97.

  • 42

    FinfgeldDL. Psychotherapy in cyberspace. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc (1999) 5(4):105–10. doi: 10.1016/S1078-3903(99)90008-3

  • 43

    AllemanJR. Online counseling: The Internet and mental health treatment. Psychother: Theory Res Pract Training (2002) 39(2):199–209. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.39.2.199

  • 44

    ChaetDClearfieldRSabinJESkimmingK. Ethical practice in telehealth and telemedicine. J Gen Internal Med (2017) 32(10):1136–40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4082-2

  • 45

    NelsonE-LDavisKVelasquezSE. Ethical considerations in providing mental health services over videoteleconferencing. In: MyersKTurveyCL, editors. Telemental health: Clinical, technical, and administrative foundations for evidence-based practice. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (2013). p. 47–62.

  • 46

    ValdagnoMGoracciAdi VoloSFagioliniA. Telepsychiatry: New perspectives and open issues. CNS Spectrums (2014) 19(6):479–81. doi: 10.1017/s1092852913000916

  • 47

    BarakA. Psychological applications on the Internet: A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Appl Prev Psychol (1999) 8(4):231–45. doi: 10.1016/s0962-1849(05)80038-1

  • 48

    GuptaKSinhaABholaP. Intersections between ethics and technology: Online client-therapist interactions. In: BholaPRaguramA, editors. Ethical issues in counselling and psychotherapy practice: Walking the line. New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media (2016). p. 169–86.

  • 49

    ReedGMMcLaughlinCJMilhollandK. Ten interdisciplinary principles for professional practice in telehealth: Implications for psychology. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2000) 31(2):170–8. doi: 10.1037//0735-7028.31.2.170

  • 50

    BarnwellSS. The accidental telepsychologist: Creating opportunities in a burgeoning field. In: MaheuMMDrudeKPWrightSD, editors. Career paths in telemental health. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (2017). p. 131–8.

  • 51

    LauPLAga Mohd JaladinRAbdullahHS. Understanding the two sides of online counseling and their ethical and legal ramifications. Proc Soc Behav Sci (2013) 103:1243–51. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.453

  • 52

    NormanS. The use of telemedicine in psychiatry. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs (2006) 13(6):771–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.01033.x

  • 53

    FruehBCDeitschSESantosABGoldPBJohnsonMRMeislerNet al. Procedural and methodological issues in telepsychiatry research and program development. Psychiatr Serv (2000) 51(12):1522–7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.12.1522

  • 54

    FrankishKRyanCHarrisA. Psychiatry and online social media: Potential, pitfalls and ethical guidelines for psychiatrists and trainees. Australas Psychiatry (2012) 20(3):181–7. doi: 10.1177/1039856212447881

  • 55

    KoocherGP. Twenty-first century ethical challenges for psychology. Am Psychol (2007) 62(5):375–84. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.5.375

  • 56

    ChildressCA. Ethical issues in providing online psychotherapeutic interventions. J Med Internet Res (2000) 2(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2.1.e5

  • 57

    GambleNBoyleCMorrisZA. Ethical practice in telepsychology. Aust Psychol (2015) 50(4):292–8. doi: 10.1111/ap.12133

  • 58

    HaasLJBenedictJGKobosJC. Psychotherapy by telephone: Risks and benefits for psychologists and consumers. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (1996) 27(2):154–60. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.27.2.154

  • 59

    HeinlenKTWelfelERRichmondENRakCF. The scope of WebCounseling: A survey of services and compliance with NBCC Standards for the ethical practice of WebCounseling. J Couns Dev (2003b) 81(1):61–9. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00226.x

  • 60

    FantusSMishnaF. The ethical and clinical implications of utilizing cybercommunication in face-to-face therapy. Smith Coll Stud In Soc Work (2013) 83(4):466–80. doi: 10.1080/00377317.2013.833049

  • 61

    ChildressCAAsamenJK. The emerging relationship of psychology and the Internet: Proposed guidelines for conducting Internet intervention research. Ethics Behav (1998) 8(1):19–35. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0801_2

  • 62

    PalomaresRSMillerTW. Security and transmission of data and information. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 83–98.

  • 63

    LeeS. Contemporary issues of ethical e-therapy. J Ethics In Ment Health (2010) 5(1):1–5.

  • 64

    HarrisBBirnbaumR. Ethical and legal implications on the use of technology in counselling. Clin Soc Work J (2015) 43(2):133–41. doi: 10.1007/s10615-014-0515-0

  • 65

    MidkiffDMWyattWJ. Ethical issues in the provision of online mental health services (etherapy). J Technol In Hum Serv (2008) 26(2/4):310–32. doi: 10.1080/15228830802096994

  • 66

    GorePAJr.LeuwerkeWC. Technological advances: Implications for counseling psychology research, training, and practice. In: BrownSDLentRW, editors. Handbook of counseling psychology, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc (2008). p. 38–53.

  • 67

    FordGG. Ethical reasoning for mental health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. (2006).

  • 68

    LovejoyTIDemirevaPDGraysonJLMcNamaraJR. Advancing the practice of online psychotherapy: An application of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory. Psychother: Theory Res Pract Training (2009) 46(1):112–24. doi: 10.1037/a0015153

  • 69

    AmesJ. Counselling online in HE: Opportunities and challenges. In: MairD, editor. Short-term counselling in higher education: Context, theory and practiceNew York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: (2016). p. 179–96.

  • 70

    DeMersSTHarrisEABakerDC. Interjurisdictional practice. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 141–64.

  • 71

    MaheuMMMcMenaminJPulierML. Optimizing the use of technology in psychology with best practice principles. In: KoocherGPNorcrossJCGreeneBA, editors. Psychologists’ desk reference, 3rd ed. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press (2013). p. 695–9.

  • 72

    DerseARMillerTE. Net effect: Professional and ethical challenges of medicine online. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics (2008) 17(4):453–64. doi: 10.1017/s0963180108080572

  • 73

    RegueiroVMcMartinJSchaeferCWoodyJM. Efficacy, efficiency, and ethics in the provision of telepsychology services: Emerging applications for international workers. J Psychol Theol (2016) 44(4):290–302. doi: 10.1177/009164711604400404

  • 74

    MattisonM. Social work practice in the digital age: Therapeutic e-mail as a direct practice methodology. Soc Work (2012) 57(3):249–58. doi: 10.1093/sw/sws021

  • 75

    LloydMG. Have you had a long-distance therapeutic relationship? You will. Ethics Behav (1996) 6(2):170–2. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0602_10

  • 76

    FinnJBruceS. The LivePerson model for delivery of etherapy services: A case study. J Technol In Hum Serv (2008) 26(2/4):282–309. doi: 10.1080/15228830802096820

  • 77

    MartinAC. Legal, clinical, and ethical issues in teletherapy. In: ScharffJS, editor. Psychoanalysis online: Mental health, teletherapy, and training. Karnac Books: London, England (2013). p. 75–84.

  • 78

    RichardsDViganóN. Online counseling: A narrative and critical review of the literature. J Clin Psychol (2013) 69(9):994–1011. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21974

  • 79

    BakerKDRayM. Online counseling: The good, the bad, and the possibilities. Couns Psychol Q (2011) 24(4):341–6. doi: 10.1080/09515070.2011.632875

  • 80

    BhuvaneswarCGGutheilTG. E-mail and psychiatry: Some psychotherapeutic and psychoanalytic perspectives. Am J Psychother (2008) 62(3):241–61. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2008.62.3.241

  • 81

    FlemingDAEdisonKEPakH. Telehealth ethics. Telemed J e-Health (2009) 15(8):797–803. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0035

  • 82

    DeenSRWithersAHellersteinDJ. Mental health practitioners' use and attitudes regarding the Internet and social media. J Psychiatr Pract (2013) 19(6):454–63. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000438184.74359.88

  • 83

    NaskarSVictorRDasHNathK. Telepsychiatry in India: Where do we stand? A comparative review between global and Indian telepsychiatry programs. Indian J psychol Med (2017) 39(3):223–42. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.207329

  • 84

    GolkaramnayVWangemannTDogsJDogsPKordyH. Neue Br¨cken für Lücken in der psychotherapeutischen Versorgung durch das Internet: Hoffnungen, Herausforderungen und ein Lösungsansatz [New bridges for gaps in psychotherapeutic service provision by the Internet: Hopes, challenges and a solution]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol (2003) 53(9-10):399–405. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42175

  • 85

    DyerKAThompsonCD. Medical Internet ethics: A field in evolution. Stud In Health Technol Inf (2001) 84(Pt 2):1287–91.

  • 86

    AndersenAJWSvenssonT. Internet-based mental health services in Norway and Sweden: Characteristics and consequences. Admin Policy In Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res (2013) 40(2):145–53. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0388-2

  • 87

    SampsonJPKolodinskyRWGreenoBP. Counseling on the information highway: Future possibilities and potential problems. J Couns Dev (1997) 75(3):203–12. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1997.tb02334.x

  • 88

    YagerJ. E-mail therapy for anorexia nervosa: Prospects and limitations. Eur Eat Disord Rev (2003) 11(3):198–209. doi: 10.1002/erv.526

  • 89

    SatalkarPShrivastavaSDe SousaA. Internet-mediated psychotherapy: Are we ready for the ethical challenges?Indian J Med Ethics (2015) 12(4):220–7.

  • 90

    ClarkPACapuzziKHarrisonJ. Telemedicine: Medical, legal and ethical perspectives. Med Sci Monitor (2010) 16(12):RA261–72.

  • 91

    Manhal-BaugusM. E-therapy: Practical, ethical, and legal issues. CyberPsychol Behav (2001) 4(5):551–63. doi: 10.1089/109493101753235142

  • 92

    RochlenABZackJSSpeyerC. Online therapy: Review of relevant definitions, debates, and current empirical support. J Clin Psychol (2004) 60(3):269–83. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10263

  • 93

    ChinJJ. Medical professionalism in the Internet age. Ann Acad Med Singapore (2010) 39(5):345–7.

  • 94

    GunterTDSrinivasaraghavanJTerryNP. Misinformed regulation of electronic medicine is unfair to responsible telepsychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law (2003) 31(1):10–4.

  • 95

    GuptaAAgrawalA. Internet counselling and psychological services. Soc Sci Int (2012) 28(1):105–22.

  • 96

    HolmesK. How ethically we practice online: An exploration of potential online provider liability. Annu Rev CyberTher Telemed (2008b) 6:97–102.

  • 97

    KaplanEH. Telepsychotherapy: Psychotherapy by telephone, videotelephone, and computer videoconferencing. J Psychother Pract Res (1997) 6(3):227–37.

  • 98

    McClureRFLivingstonRBLivingstonKHGageR. A survey of practicing psychotherapists. J Prof Couns: Pract Theory Res (2005) 33(1):35–46. doi: 10.1080/15566382.2005.12033811

  • 99

    McMinnMROrtonJJWoodsSW. Technology in clinical practice. J Psychol Christ (2008) 27(1):56–60.

  • 100

    MillerTEDerseAR. Between strangers: The practice of medicine online. Health Aff (2002) 21(4):168–79. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.168

  • 101

    OlasupoMOAtiriOS. E-therapy: Contemporary tool in psychotherapy. Ife PsychologIA: Int J (2013) 21(3):408–13.

  • 102

    PergamentD. Internet psychotherapy: Current status and future regulation. Health Matrix: J Law Med (1998) 8(2):233–79.

  • 103

    ReamerFG. Social work in a digital age: Ethical and risk management challenges. Soc Work (2013) 58(2):163–72. doi: 10.1093/sw/swt003

  • 104

    Riemer-ReissML. Utilizing distance technology for mental health counseling. J Ment Health Couns (2000) 22(3):189–203.

  • 105

    SwensonJ.E., IIISmothermonJRosenbladSRChalmersB. The future is here: Ethical practices of telemental health. J Psychol Christ (2016) 35(4):310–9.

  • 106

    MurphyLMitchellDHallettR. A comparison of client characteristics in cyber and in-person counseling. Annu Rev CyberTher Telemed (2011) 9:121–4.

  • 107

    NagarajanMSY. Mental health counsellors' perceptions on use of technology in counselling. Curr Psychol (2019), 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-0104-4

  • 108

    DohertyGW. Mental health and the new technologies. PsycCRITIQUES (2005) 50(11). doi: 10.1037/050042

  • 109

    FukuyamaM. To be or not to be. PsycCRITIQUES (2016) 61(20). doi: 10.1037/a0040291

  • 110

    RobertsBT. Telemental health comes of age with step-by-step guide (and choices) to incorporate into practice. PsycCRITIQUES (2016) 61(46). doi: 10.1037/a0040597

  • 111

    ChanSLiLTorousJGratzerDYellowleesPM. Review of use of asynchronous technologies incorporated in mental health care. Curr Psychiatry Rep (2018) 20(85). doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0954-3

  • 112

    Research digest. Couns Psychol Q (2004) 17(2):235–7. doi: 10.1080/09515070410001728244

  • 113

    GossSAnthonyKE. The development of ethical guidelines for online counselling and psychotherapy. In: LangrialSU, editor. Web-based behavioral therapies for mental disorders. Hershey, PA: IGI Global (2018). p. 212–40.

  • 114

    Adams LarsenMJuntunenC. Informed consent. In: CampbellLFMillánFAMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 47–67.

  • 115

    AlaoAOSoderbergMPohlELAlaoAL. Cybersuicide: Review of the role of the Internet on suicide. CyberPsychol Behav (2006) 9(4):489–93. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.489

  • 116

    BakerDCBufkaLF. Preparing for the telehealth world: Navigating legal, regulatory, reimbursement, and ethical issues in an electronic age. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):405–11. doi: 10.1037/a0025037

  • 117

    BarnettJEKolmesK. The practice of tele-mental health: Ethical, legal, and clinical issues for practitioners. Pract Innovations (2016) 1(1):53–66. doi: 10.1037/pri0000014

  • 118

    BarnettJE. Online counseling: New entity, new challenges. Couns Psychol (2005) 33(6):872–80. doi: 10.1177/0011000005279961

  • 119

    BarnettJE. Utilizing technological innovations to enhance psychotherapy supervision, training, and outcomes. Psychotherapy (2011) 48(2):103–8. doi: 10.1037/a0023381

  • 120

    BarskyAE. Social work practice and technology: Ethical issues and policy responses. J Technol In Hum Serv (2017) 35(1):8–19. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2017.1277906

  • 121

    BauerSGolkaramnayVKordyH. E-Mental-Health: Neue Medien in der psychosozialen Versorgung [E-mental-health: The use of new technologies in psychosocial care]. Psychotherapeut (2005) 50(1):7–15. doi: 10.1007/s00278-004-0403-0

  • 122

    Ben-ZeevDKaiserSMKrzosI. Remote “hovering” with individuals with psychotic disorders and substance use: Feasibility, engagement, and therapeutic alliance with a text-messaging mobile interventionist. J Dual Diag (2014) 10(4):197–203. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2014.962336

  • 123

    BlomKTillgrenHTWiklundTDanlyckeEForssénMSöderströmAet al. Internet-vs. group-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Behav Res Ther (2015) 70:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.05.002

  • 124

    BradleyLJHendricksBLockRWhitingPPParrG. E-mail communication: Issues for mental health counselors. J Ment Health Couns (2011) 33(1):67–79. doi: 10.17744/mehc.33.1.05208025375v03r7

  • 125

    CampbellLFMillánFAMartinJN. Afterword. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018b). p. 165–6.

  • 126

    CanningSHauserMJGutheilTGBursztajnHJ. Communications in psychiatric practice: Decision making and the use of the telephone. In: GutheilTGBursztajnHJBrodskyAAlexanderV, editors. Decision making in psychiatry and the law. Baltimore, MD, US: Williams & Wilkins Co (1991). p. 227–35.

  • 127

    CloseRE. Adlerian counseling in a virtual world: Some implications of Internet practice for the development of Gemeinschaftsgefühl. J Individ Psychol (2015) 71(2):155–62. doi: 10.1353/jip.2015.0017

  • 128

    ColbowAJ. Looking to the future: Integrating telemental health therapy into psychologist training. Training Educ In Prof Psychol (2013) 7(3):155–65. doi: 10.1037/a0033454

  • 129

    DartEHWhippleHMPasquaJLFurlowCM. Legal, regulatory, and ethical issues in telehealth technology. In: LuiselliJKFischerAJ, editors. Computer-assisted and web-based innovations in psychology, special education, and health. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press (2016). p. 339–63.

  • 130

    DavisAW. Ethical issues for psychologists using communication technology: An Australian perspective on service provision flexibility. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2014) 45(5):303–8. doi: 10.1037/a0037081

  • 131

    De WegerEMacinnesDEnserJFrancisSJJonesFW. Implementing video conferencing in mental health practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs (2013) 20(5):448–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01947.x

  • 132

    DeppCAMausbachBGranholmECardenasVBen-ZeevDPattersonTLet al. Mobile interventions for severe mental illness: Design and preliminary data from three approaches. J Nerv Ment Dis (2010) 198(10):715–21. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181f49ea3

  • 133

    Derrig-PalumboKZeineF. Online therapy: A therapist’s guide to expanding your practice. New York, NY, US: W. W. Norton & Company (2005).

  • 134

    DickeyRA. Perceived risks and benefits of emerging technologies in professional psychology. Doctor of Psychology (PsyD): George Fox University (2013).

  • 135

    EnanderJAnderssonEMataix-ColsDLichtensteinLAlströmKAnderssonGet al. Therapist guided Internet based cognitive behavioural therapy for body dysmorphic disorder: Single blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ: Br Med J (2016) 352:1–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i241

  • 136

    FerrerDCYellowleesPM. Telepsychiatry: Licensing and professional boundary concerns. Virtual Mentor (2012) 14(6):477–82. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.6.pfor1-1206

  • 137

    FinnJBarakA. A descriptive study of e-counsellor attitudes, ethics, and practice. Couns Psychother Res (2010) 10(4):268–77. doi: 10.1080/14733140903380847

  • 138

    FrameMW. The ethics of counseling via the Internet. Family J (1997) 5(4):328–30. doi: 10.1177/1066480797054009

  • 139

    GiotakosO. Modern technologies and applications and community psychiatry. In: StylianidisS, editor. Social and community psychiatry: Towards a critical, patient-oriented approach. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland (2016). p. 331–41.

  • 140

    GraffCAHeckerLL. E-therapy: Developing an ethical online practice. In: HeckerL, editor. Ethics and professional issues in couple and family therapy. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group (2010). p. 243–55.

  • 141

    HaberstrohSBarneyLFosterNDuffeyT. The ethical and legal practice of online counseling and psychotherapy: A review of mental health professions. J Technol In Hum Serv (2014) 32(3):149–57. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2013.872074

  • 142

    HarrisEYounggrenJN. Risk management in the digital world. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):412–8. doi: 10.1037/a0025139

  • 143

    HarwoodTMPrattDBeutlerLEBongarBMLenoreSForresterBT. Technology, telehealth, treatment enhancement, and selection. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):448–54. doi: 10.1037/a0026214

  • 144

    HeinlenKTWelfelERRichmondENO'DonnellMS. The nature, scope, and ethics of psychologists’ e-therapy Web sites: What consumers find when surfing the Web. Psychother: Theory Res Pract Training (2003a) 40(1/2):112–24. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.112

  • 145

    HelmSKoyanagiCElseIHortonMFukudaM. The University of Hawai‘i Rural Health Collaboration: Partnerships to provide adult telepsychiatry services. Psychiatr Serv (2010) 61(10):961–3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.61.10.961

  • 146

    HilgartMThorndikeFPPardoJRitterbandLM. Ethical issues of web-based interventions and online therapy. In: LeachMMStevensMJLindsayGFerreroAKorkutY, editors. The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press (2012). p. 161–75.

  • 147

    HiltyDMLuoJSMoracheCMarceloDANesbittTS. Telepsychiatry: An overview for psychiatrists. CNS Drugs (2002) 16(8):527–48. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216080-00003

  • 148

    HolmesLG. Delivering mental health services on-line: Current issues. CyberPsychol Behav (1998) 1(1):19–24. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.19

  • 149

    HsiungRC. Suggested principles of professional ethics for the online provision of mental health services. Telemed J E-Health (2001) 7(1):39–45. doi: 10.1089/153056201300093895

  • 150

    HsiungRC. Suggested principles of professional ethics for e-therapy. In: HsiungRC, editor. e-Therapy: Case studies, guiding principles, and the clinical potential of the Internet. New York, NY, US: W. W. Norton & Company (2002). p. 150–65.

  • 151

    JennettPAAffleck HallLHaileyDOhinmaaAAndersonCThomasRet al. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare (2003) 9(6):311–20. doi: 10.1258/135763303771005207

  • 152

    JonesRBAshurstEJ. Online anonymous discussion between service users and health professionals to ascertain stakeholder concerns in using e-health services in mental health. Health Inf J (2013) 19(4):281–99. doi: 10.1177/1460458212474908

  • 153

    KassawKGabbardGO. The ethics of e-mail communication in psychiatry. Psychiatr Clinics North America (2002) 25(3):665–74. doi: 10.1016/S0193-953X(02)00005-9

  • 154

    KennyMCMcEachernAG. Telephone counseling: Are offices becoming obsolete?J Couns Dev (2004) 82(2):199–202. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00302.x

  • 155

    KlausCLHartshorneTS. Ethical implications of trends in technology. J Individ Psychol (2015) 71(2):195–204. doi: 10.1353/jip.2015.0012

  • 156

    KnaevelsrudCJagerJMaerckerA. Internet-Psychotherapie: Wirksamkeit und Besonderheiten der therapeutischen Beziehung [Online-therapy: Effectiveness and peculiarities of the therapeutic relationship]. Verhaltenstherapie (2004) 14(3):174–83. doi: 10.1159/000080913

  • 157

    KolmesK. Social media in the future of professional psychology. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2012) 43(6):606–12. doi: 10.1037/a0028678

  • 158

    KotsopoulouAMelisAKoutsompouVIKarasarlidouC. E-therapy: The ethics behind the process. Proc Comput Sci (2015) 65:492–9. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.120

  • 159

    KrausR. Ethical and legal considerations for providers of mental health services online. In: KrausRZackJSStrickerG, editors. Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals. New York, NY, US: Elsevier Science (2004). p. 123–44.

  • 160

    Landry PooleJMCrowBE. Confidentiality of data and information. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, US (2018). p. 69–82.

  • 161

    LustgartenSDColbowAJ. Ethical concerns for telemental health therapy amidst governmental surveillance. Am Psychol (2017) 72(2):159–70. doi: 10.1037/a0040321

  • 162

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Establishing a telemental health practice. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner’s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016c). p. 47–56.

  • 163

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Ethical telepractice with diverse populations. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner’s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016d). p. 109–20.

  • 164

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Ethical, legal, and other risk management considerations. In: LuxtonDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner’s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016e). p. 31–46.

  • 165

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Introduction. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner’s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016f). p. 3–8.

  • 166

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Overview of telemental health technologies. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner"s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016g). p. 17–29.

  • 167

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Providing direct clinical care. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner"s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, US (2016h). p. 71–84.

  • 168

    LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM. Safety planning and emergency management. In: LuxtonDDNelsonE-LMaheuMM, editors. A practitioner"s guide to telemental health: How to conduct legal, ethical, and evidence-based telepractice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2016i). p. 57–70.

  • 169

    MaheuMMPulierMLWilhelmFHMcMenaminJPBrown-ConnollyNE. The mental health professional and the new technologies: A handbook for practice today. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers (2005).

  • 170

    MasiDFreedmanM. The use of telephone and on line technology in assessment, counseling, and therapy. Empl Assist Q (2001) 16(3):49–63. doi: 10.1300/J022v16n03_05

  • 171

    McCartyDClancyC. Telehealth: Implications for social work practice. Soc Work (2002) 47(2):153–61. doi: 10.1093/sw/47.2.153

  • 172

    MishnaFBogoMRootJSawyerJLKhoury-KassabriM. “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clin Soc Work J (2012) 40(3):277–86. doi: 10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4

  • 173

    MorganJLackCStorchEA. The utilization of technology in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. In: BerhardtLV, editor. Advances in medicine and biology: Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, Inc (2010). p. 161–76.

  • 174

    MurphyJMPomerantzAM. Informed consent: An adaptable question format for telepsychology. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2016) 47(5):330–9. doi: 10.1037/pro0000098

  • 175

    NelsonE-LDuncanAB. Cognitive behavioral therapy using televideo. Cogn Behav Pract (2015) 22(3):269–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.03.001

  • 176

    NelsonE-LVelasquezSE. Implementing psychological services over televideo. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):535–42. doi: 10.1037/a0026178

  • 177

    NorrisLSwartzLTomlinsonM. Mobile phone technology for improved mental health care in South Africa: Possibilities and challenges. South Afr J Psychol (2013) 43(3):379–88. doi: 10.1177/0081246313493376

  • 178

    Perez-GarciaGJ. Ethics of telepsychiatry. In: SadlerJZFulfordKWMvan StadenW, editors. The Oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press (2015). p. 1346–59.

  • 179

    PutnamDEMaheuMM. Online sexual addiction and compulsivity: Integrating web resources and behavioral telehealth in treatment. Sex Addict Compulsivity (2000) 7(1-2):91–112. doi: 10.1080/10720160008400209

  • 180

    RaguseaASVandeCreekL. Suggestions for the ethical practice of online psychotherapy. Psychother: Theory Res Pract Training (2003) 40(1/2):94–102. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.94

  • 181

    RaguseaAS. The more things change, the more they stay the same: Ethical issues in the provision of telehealth. In: KnappSJGottliebMCHandelsmanMMVandeCreekLD, editors. APA handbook of ethics in psychology: Practice, teaching, and research. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2012). p. 183–98.

  • 182

    ReedRNMesslerECCoombsTEQuevillonRP. Social media use and the acceptability of telepsychological services in rural populations. J Rural Ment Health (2014) 38(1):2–8. doi: 10.1037/rmh0000007

  • 183

    RehmLP. How far have we come in teletherapy? Comment on “Telephone-Administered Psychotherapy”. Clin Psychol: Sci Pract (2008) 15(3):259–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00136.x

  • 184

    RichardsDViganòN. Online counseling. In: YanZ, editor. Encyclopedia of cyber behavior. Hershey, PA, US: IGI Global (2012). p. 699–713.

  • 185

    RobinsonPSerfatyM. Computers, e-mail and therapy in eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev (2003) 11(3):210–21. doi: 10.1002/erv.516

  • 186

    RobsonDRobsonM. Ethical issues in Internet counselling. Couns Psychol Q (2000) 13(3):249–57. doi: 10.1080/09515070010037911

  • 187

    RosenfieldM. Electronic technology for social work education and practice: The application of telephone technology to counselling. J Technol In Hum Serv (2002) 20(1-2):173–81. doi: 10.1300/J017v20n01_13

  • 188

    SabinJEHarlandJC. Professional ethics for digital age psychiatry: Boundaries, privacy, and communication. Curr Psychiatry Rep (2017) 19(9):55. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0815-5

  • 189

    SabinJESkimmingK. A framework of ethics for telepsychiatry practice. Int Rev Psychiatry (2015) 27(6):490–5. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1094034

  • 190

    SampsonDMuellerM. Integrating behavioral health into rural primary care clinics utilizing a telemental health model. In: MaheuMMDrudeKPWrightSD, editors. Career paths in telemental health. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland (2017). p. 277–83.

  • 191

    Sansom-DalyUMWakefieldCEMcGillBCWilsonHLPattersonP. Consensus among international ethical guidelines for the provision of videoconferencing-based mental health treatments. JMIR Ment Health (2016) 3(2):e17. doi: 10.2196/mental.5481

  • 192

    SanthiveeranJ. Compliance of social work e-therapy websites to the NASW Code of Ethics. Soc Work In Health Care (2009) 48(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/00981380802231216

  • 193

    SchoppLHDemirisGGlueckaufRL. Rural backwaters or front-runners? Rural telehealth in the vanguard of psychology practice. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2006) 37(2):165–73. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.37.2.165

  • 194

    SchwartzTJLonborgSD. Security management in telepsychology. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):419–25. doi: 10.1037/a0026102

  • 195

    ShawHEShawSF. Critical ethical issues in online counseling: Assessing current practices with an ethical intent checklist. J Couns Dev (2006) 84(1):41–53. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2006.tb00378.x

  • 196

    ShoreJHHiltyDMYellowleesP. Emergency management guidelines for telepsychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiatry (2007) 29(3):199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.01.013

  • 197

    SkinnerAZackJS. Counseling and the Internet. Am Behav Sci (2004) 48(4):434–46. doi: 10.1177/0002764204270280

  • 198

    StrickerG. Psychotherapy in cyberspace. Ethics Behav (1996) 6(2):175–7. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0602_12

  • 199

    TaintorZ. Review of e-therapy: Case studies, guiding principles, and the clinical potential of the Internet. Psychiatr Serv (2003) 54(10):1422. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.12.1584

  • 200

    TangSHelmesteD. Digital psychiatry. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2000) 54(1):1–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00628.x

  • 201

    TerryNP. The legal implications of e-therapy. In: HsiungRC, editor. e-therapy: Case studies, guiding principles, and the clinical potential of the Internet. New York, NY, US: W. W. Norton & Company (2002). p. 166–93.

  • 202

    TurveyCLMyersK. Introduction. In: MyersKTurveyCL, editors. Telemental health: Clinical, technical, and administrative foundations for evidence-based practice. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (2013). p. 3–9.

  • 203

    TylerJMSabellaRA. Using technology to improve counseling practice: A primer for the 21st century. Alexandria, VA, US: American Counseling Association (2004).

  • 204

    VallyZ. Cybertherapy: Development and usage in the South African context. Ife PsychologIA: Int J (2006) 14(2):151–65. doi: 10.4314/ifep.v14i2.23716

  • 205

    Van AllenJRobertsMC. Critical incidents in the marriage of psychology and technology: A discussion of potential ethical issues in practice, education, and policy. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2011) 42(6):433–9. doi: 10.1037/a0025278

  • 206

    WadeMEMoorheadHJHLevittDH. Online counseling. In: LevittDHMoorheadHJH, editors. Values and ethics in counseling: Real-life ethical decision making. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group (2013). p. 195–201.

  • 207

    WadeVAEliottJAHillerJE. A qualitative study of ethical, medico-legal and clinical governance matters in Australian telehealth services. J Telemed Telecare (2012) 18(2):109–14. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110808

  • 208

    WallworkE. Ethical aspects of teletherapy. In: ScharffJS, editor. Psychoanalysis online: Mental health, teletherapy, and training. Karnac Books: London, England (2013). p. 85–94.

  • 209

    WallworkE. Thinking ethically about beginning online work. In: ScharffJS, editor. Psychoanalysis online 2: Impact of technology on development, training, and therapy. London, England: Karnac Books (2015). p. 83–92.

  • 210

    WebbCOrwigJ. Expanding our reach: Telehealth and licensure implications for psychologists. J Clin Psychol In Med S (2015) 22(4):243–50. doi: 10.1007/s10880-015-9440-9

  • 211

    WeitzP. Establishing an online practice. In: WeitzP, editor. Psychotherapy 2.0: Where psychotherapy and technology meet. London, England: Karnac Books (2014). p. 147–89.

  • 212

    WelfelERHeinlenKT. Ethics in technology and mental health. In: CucciareMAWeingardtKR, editors. Using technology to support evidence-based behavioral health practices: A clinician"s guide. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group (2010). p. 267–90.

  • 213

    YuenEKGoetterEMHerbertJDFormanEM. Challenges and opportunities in Internet-mediated telemental health. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2012) 43(1):1–8. doi: 10.1037/a0025524

  • 214

    BasavarajappaCChandPK. Digital platforms for mental health-care delivery. Indian J psychol Med (2017) 39(5):703–6. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_209_17

  • 215

    BolleSRTrondsenMVStenslandGOTjoraA. Usefulness of videoconferencing in psychiatric emergencies—a qualitative study. Health Technol (2018) 8(1-2):111–7. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0189-z

  • 216

    EbertDDVan DaeleTNordgreenTKareklaMCompareAZarboCet al. Internet- and mobile-based psychological interventions: Applications, efficacy, and potential for improving mental health: A report of the EFPA E-Health Taskforce. Eur Psychol (2018) 23(2):167–87. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000318

  • 217

    EichenbergCHübnerL. Psychoanalyse via Internet: Aktueller Stand der Diskussion um Möglichkeiten und Grenzen [Psychoanalysis via internet: Current state of the discussion on possibilities and limitations]. Psychotherapeut (2018) 63(4):283–90. doi: 10.1007/s00278-018-0294-0

  • 218

    GlueckaufRLMaheuMMDrudeKPWellsBAWangYGustafsonDJet al. Survey of psychologists' telebehavioral health practices: Technology use, ethical issues, and training needs. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2018) 49(3):205–19. doi: 10.1037/pro0000188

  • 219

    IgnatowiczAAthertonHBernsteinCJBryceCCourtRSturtJet al. Internet videoconferencing for patient-clinician consultations in long-term conditions: A review of reviews and applications in line with guidelines and recommendations. Digit Health (2019) 5:1–27. doi: 10.1177/2055207619845831

  • 220

    KaryotakiEFurukawaTAEfthimiouORiperHCuijpersP. Guided or self-guided internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (iCBT) for depression? Study protocol of an individual participant data network meta-analysis. BMJ Open (2019) 9:e026820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026820

  • 221

    LowmanRLCooperSE. Emerging ethical issues and challenges. In: LowmanRLCooperSE, editors. The ethical practice of consulting psychology. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 77–95.

  • 222

    MagnavitaJJ. Intoduction: How can technology advance mental health treatment? In: MagnavitaJJ, editor. Using technology in mental health practice. Washington, DC, US: : (2018). p. 3–10.

  • 223

    ReamerFG. Evolving standards of care in the age of cybertechnology. Behav Sci Law (2018) 36(2):257–69. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2336

  • 224

    RubeisGStegerF. Internet- und mobilgestützte Interventionen bei psychischen Stoürungen: Implementierung in Deutschland aus ethischer Sicht [Internet and mobile-assisted interventions in mental disorders: Implementation in Germany from an ethical perspective]. Nervenarzt (2019) 90(5):497–502. doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0663-5

  • 225

    ShoreJHYellowleesPCaudillRJohnstonBTurveyCMishkindMet al. Policy: Best practices in videoconferencing-based telemental health April 2018. Telemed J e-Health (2018) 40(11):827–32. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0237

  • 226

    Smucker BarnwellSCampbellLF. Ethical and legal aspects of the practice of teletherapy. In: WalfishSBarnettJEZimmermanJ, editors. Handbook of private practice: Keys to success for mental health practitioners. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press (2017). p. 492–505.

  • 227

    SobelmanSASantopietroJM. Managing risk: Aligning technology use with the law, ethics codes, and practice standards. In: MagnavitaJJ, editor. Using technology in mental health practice. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, US (2018). p. 13–24.

  • 228

    VentriglioAToralesJCastaldelli-MaiaJ. Telepsychiatry and social psychiatry. Int J Soc Psychiatry (2017) 63(5):387–8. doi: 10.1177/0020764017694661

  • 229

    ZimmermanJMagnavitaJJ. Adopting new technology for your practice: How to assess fit and risks. In: MagnavitaJJ, editor. Using technology in mental health practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 209–21.

  • 230

    HaverenRVHabbenCJKutherTL. New psychologists online: Changing the face of psychology through technology. In: MorganRDKutherTLHabbenCJ, editors. Life after graduate school in psychology: Insider’s advice from new psychologists. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press (2005). p. 321–7.

  • 231

    MonnierJKnappRGFruehBC. Recent advances in telepsychiatry: An updated review. Psychiatr Serv (2003) 54(12):1604–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.12.1604

  • 232

    PalomaresRS. Standards of care in the delivery of telepsychology services. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 27–46.

  • 233

    ShapiroDESchulmanCE. Ethic and legal issues in e-mail therapy. Ethics Behav (1996) 6(2):107–24. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0602_3

  • 234

    Smucker BarnwellSMcCannRMcCutcheonS. Competence of the psychologist. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 7–26.

  • 235

    WelfelER. Emerging issues in the duty to protect. In: WerthJLJr.WelfelERBenjaminGAH, editors. The duty to protect: Ethical, legal, and professional considerations for mental health professionals. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2009). p. 229–47.

  • 236

    WiederholdMD. Review of technology in counselling and psychotherapy: A practitioner’s guide. CyberPsychol Behav (2004) 7(1):119–20. doi: 10.1089/109493104322820192

  • 237

    RecuperoPRFelthousAR. Introduction to this special issue: The internet, cybertechnology and the law. Behav Sci Law (2018) 36(2):131–5. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2341

  • 238

    JenkinsPELuckABurrowsABoughtonN. Comparison of face-to-face versus email guided self-help for binge eating: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials (2014) 15:181. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-181

  • 239

    BloomJW. The ethical practice of WebCounseling. Br J Guid Couns (1998) 26(1):53–9. doi: 10.1080/03069889800760061

  • 240

    CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN. Introduction. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018a). p. 3–6.

  • 241

    FisherCBFriedAL. Internet-mediated psychological services and the American Psychological Association Ethics Code. In: BersoffDN, editor. Ethical conflicts in psychology, 4th ed. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2008). p. 376–83.

  • 242

    HugginsR. Using mobile phone communication for therapeutic intervention. In: GossSAnthonyKStretchLSNagelDM, editors. Technology in mental health: Applications in practice, supervision and training, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL, US: Charles C Thomas Publisher (2016). p. 28–42.

  • 243

    HylerSEGangureDP. Legal and ethical challenges in telepsychiatry. J Psychiatr Pract (2004) 10(4):272–6. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200407000-00011

  • 244

    MaheuMMGordonBL. Counseling and therapy on the Internet. Prof Psychol: Res Pract (2000) 31(5):484–9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.31.5.484

  • 245

    SchlosserB. Transmitter v. Hedonia. Ethics Behav (1996) 6(2):172–4. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0602_11

  • 246

    Smucker BarnwellSAdams LarsenM. Disposal of data, information, and technologies. In: CampbellLFMillánFMartinJN, editors. A telepsychology casebook: Using technology ethically and effectively in your professional practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association (2018). p. 99–119.

  • 247

    CampbellLFNorcrossJC. Do you see what we see? Psychology’s response to technology in mental health. Clin Psychol Sci Pract (2018) 25(2):e12237. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12237

  • 248

    LangarizadehMMoghbeliFAliabadiA. Application of ethics for providing telemedicine services and information technology. Med Arch (2017) 71(5):351–5. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.351-355

  • 249

    GrayA. Cybertherapy. Psychiatr Bull (1999) 23(11):690–1. doi: 10.1192/pb.23.11.690-a

Summary

Keywords

online psychotherapy, telepsychology, telepsychiatry, ethics, technology

Citation

Stoll J, Müller JA and Trachsel M (2020) Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review. Front. Psychiatry 10:993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993

Received

16 September 2019

Accepted

13 December 2019

Published

11 February 2020

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Cynthia H. Y. Fu, University of East London, United Kingdom

Reviewed by

Warren Mansell, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Janardhan Y. C. Reddy, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, India

Updates

Copyright

© 2020 Stoll, Müller and Trachsel.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Manuel Trachsel,

This article was submitted to Psychological Therapies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics