Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychiatry, 20 November 2020
Sec. Public Mental Health

Corrigendum: Prevalence of Common Mental Disorders in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis

\nSadiq NaveedSadiq Naveed1Ahmed Waqas
Ahmed Waqas2*Amna Mohyud Din ChaudharyAmna Mohyud Din Chaudhary3Sham KumarSham Kumar4Noureen AbbasNoureen Abbas5Rizwan AminRizwan Amin6Nida JamilNida Jamil7Sidra SaleemSidra Saleem4
  • 1Department of Child Psychiatry, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
  • 2Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 3Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan
  • 4Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • 5FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 6King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 7Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

A Corrigendum on
Prevalence of Common Mental Disorders in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis

by Naveed, S., Waqas, A., Chaudhary, A. M. D., Kumar, S., Abbas, N., Amin, R., et al. (2020). Front. Psychiatry 11:573150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573150

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 “Pooled prevalence of mental disorders in South Asia” as published. Prevalence estimates of five of the psychiatric disorders were wrongly formatted with misplaced decimal points. The corrected Table 1 “Pooled prevalence of mental disorders in South Asia” appears below.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Pooled prevalence of mental disorders in South Asia.

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 3 “Subgroup analyses presenting several factors associated with the prevalence of CMDs in included studies” as published. Prevalence estimates for subgroups of sampling methods were wrongly formatted. The corrected Table 3 “Subgroup analyses presenting several factors associated with the prevalence of CMDs in included studies” appears below.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. “Subgroup analyses presenting several factors associated with the prevalence of CMDs in included studies”.

In the original article, there was an error. Prevalence estimates for panic disorder was wrongly formatted with misplaced decimal points in the results section of abstract and main text.

A correction has been made to the Research section, Paragraph Number 2:

We assessed the pooled prevalence for 17 different mental disorders over a period of 10 years. All the outcomes presented significant heterogeneity ranging from 0% to 99.79% for stimulant use and alcohol abuse, respectively. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was reported in 135 studies (I2 = 99.53%) yielding a prevalence of 26.4% among 173,449 participants. Alcohol abuse was reported in 43 studies yielding a prevalence of 12.9% (8.8%−18.6%, I2 = 99.79%, n = 107893); anxiety 25.8% (19.4% to 33.5%, I2 = 99.57%, n = 70,058); tobacco smoking 18.6% (14.3% to 24%, I2 = 99.58%, n = 84965); PTSD 17.2% (11% to 25.9%, I2 = 99.55%, n = 42298); mixed anxiety and depression 28.4% (13.9% to 49.3%, I2 = 99.41%, n = 11102); suicidal behaviors 6.4% (3.1% to 12.4%, I2 = 99.41%, n = 25043); misuse of opiates 0.8% (0.2% to 2.5%, I2 = 99.06%, n = 37304); tobacco chewing 21.0% (14.0% to 30.3%, I2 = 98.49%, n = 10586); use of cannabis 3.4% (1.5% to 7.3%, I2 = 97.48%, n = 10977); GAD 2.9% (0.3% to 26.5%, I2 = 99.57%, n = 70058); bipolar disorder 0.6% (0.3% to 1.0%, I2 = 78.21%, n = 7197); IV drug abuse 2.5% (0.1% to 32.1%, I2 = 99.72%, n = 15049); Panic disorder 1.3% (0.5% to 3.4%, I2 = 95.43%, n = 28087); stimulant use 0.9% (0.5% to 1.6%, I2 = 0%, n = 1414); OCD 1.6% (0.4% to 5.5%, I2 = 96.57%, n = 8784) and phobic disorders 1.8% (0.4% to 7.1%, I2 = 98.16%, n = 27754). Supplementary Figures 1–12 represent the forest plots for the above-mentioned disorders.

In the original article, there was an error. Prevalence estimates for panic disorder was wrongly formatted with misplaced decimal points in the results section of abstract and main text.

A correction has been made to the abstract:

A prevalence of depressive symptoms was 26.4% among 173,449 participants, alcohol abuse was 12.9% (n = 107,893); anxiety 25.8% (n = 70,058); tobacco smoking 18.6% (n = 84,965); PTSD 17.2% (n = 42,298); mixed anxiety and depression 28.4% (n = 11,102); suicidal behaviors 6.4% (n = 25,043); misuse of opiates 0.8% (n = 37,304); tobacco chewing 21.0% (n = 10,586); use of cannabis 3.4% (n = 10,977); GAD 2.9% (n = 70,058); bipolar disorder 0.6% (n = 7,197); IV drug abuse 2.5% (n = 15,049); panic disorder 1.3% (n = 28,087); stimulant use 0.9% (n = 1,414); OCD 1.6% (n = 8,784) and phobic disorders 1.8% (n = 27,754).

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: psychiatric illness, South Asia, prevalence, epidemiology, common mental disorders

Citation: Naveed S, Waqas A, Chaudhary AMD, Kumar S, Abbas N, Amin R, Jamil N and Saleem S (2020) Corrigendum: Prevalence of Common Mental Disorders in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Front. Psychiatry 11:602062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602062

Received: 02 September 2020; Accepted: 14 September 2020;
Published: 20 November 2020.

Edited and reviewed by: Wulf Rössler, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Copyright © 2020 Naveed, Waqas, Chaudhary, Kumar, Abbas, Amin, Jamil and Saleem. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ahmed Waqas, ahmed.waqas@liverpool.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.