Abstract
FMR1 premutation is defined by 55–200 CGG repeats in the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. FMR1 premutation carriers are at risk of developing a neurodegenerative disease called fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and Fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) in adulthood. In the last years an increasingly board spectrum of clinical manifestations including psychiatric disorders have been described as occurring at a greater frequency among FMR1 premutation carriers. Herein, we reviewed the neuroimaging findings reported in relation with psychiatric symptomatology in adult FMR1 premutation carriers. A structured electronic literature search was conducted on FMR1 premutation and neuroimaging yielding a total of 3,229 articles examined. Of these, 7 articles were analyzed and are included in this review. The results showed that the main radiological findings among adult FMR1 premutation carriers presenting neuropsychiatric disorders were found on the amygdala and hippocampus, being the functional abnormalities more consistent and the volumetric changes more inconsistent among studies. From a molecular perspective, CGG repeat size, FMR1 mRNA and FMRP levels have been investigated in relation with the neuroimaging findings. Based on the published results, FMRP might play a key role in the pathophysiology of the psychiatric symptoms described among FMR1 premutation carriers. However, additional studies including further probes of brain function and a broader scope of psychiatric symptom measurement are required in order to obtain a comprehensive landscape of the neuropsychiatric phenotype associated with the FMR1 premutation.
Introduction
Fragile X premutation carriers is defined by 55–200 CGG repeats in the Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene, whilst the full mutation is caused by >200 CGG repeats. Two major conditions associated with the FMR1 premutation have been well-established: the fragile X-associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS) and the fragile X-associated Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (FXPOI) [reviewed in (1)] FXTAS is a late onset neurodegenerative condition, and it is seen in around 40% of male premutation carriers and 16% of females (2). FXPOI is characterized by menopause before age 40 and it is seen in around 20% of women with the FMR1 premutation (3). Nevertheless, a broader clinical spectrum of symptoms, including psychiatric, sleep, and autoimmune conditions, has been described among FMR1 permutation carriers (4). Although the extent of all this group of conditions needs further delineation, in order to bring recognition to these problems, different names were proposed. Hagerman et al., proposed fragile X-associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (FXAND) and the European Fragile X Network (EFXN) proposed to name them Fragile X-associated Neuropsychiatric Conditions (FXANC), and Fragile X Various Associated Conditions (FXVAC) to cover other physical conditions associated with the FMR1 premutation (51).
FMR1 premutation main neuropsychiatric disorders in adults include anxiety and depression and, to a lesser extent, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and substance abuse. Although most prior work has been performed examining different neuropsychiatric aspects in separate study samples, neuroimaging studies have depicted structural, functional, and connectivity changes within the brain associated to neuropsychiatric disorders. In regard to FMR1 premutation this relationship has been addressed, although with different approaches and with different population cohorts. Furthermore, a correlation on how neurostructural and neurofunctional effects might be associated with molecular aspects of the FMR1 premutation and psychiatric symptomatology has also been reported with varying results. This review focuses on the neuroimaging findings associated with neuropsychiatric disorders in adult FMR1 premutation carriers. Due to the wide clinical spectrum of neurological symptoms associated with the FMR1 premutation, including motor and cognitive impairment, executive and memory deficits, and psychiatric symptoms, we believe that a review focusing on the neuropathology, molecular underpinnings, and neuroimaging associated with neuropsychiatric findings could help to untangle the complex physiopathology associated with the FMR1 premutation.
Methods
Search Strategy
A review of the literature was conducted. PubMed, Web of Science, Pschynfo and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies from 2000 to April 2021. Search terms are listed in Research Algorithm (Supplementary Table 1) where the complete search strategy is displayed. Inclusion criteria included FMR1 premutation carriers, both genders, from 18 to 99 years old and all ethnicities. As exclusion criteria, the search was only focused on pure psychiatric symptoms and therefore motor and cognitive impairments, executive function, or memory deficits were not considered.
Study Eligibility Criteria
Eligible qualitative studies were those that matched neuroimaging findings with psychiatric symptomatology in FMR1 premutation carriers. The type of studies selected were those of any design published in peer-reviewed academic journals with abstract available. Conference proceedings, theses, case reports and case series were excluded, and review articles, non-English articles, and studies on animal models were not considered (for a graphical summary of the selection procedure, see Figure 1).
Figure 1
Diagram for identification and selection of studies.
After establishing and applying the inclusion criteria, two researchers (A. EM and L.RR) separately read the titles of the papers retrieved in the search and examined the structured abstract of the selected articles. Seven studies that described the relationship between neuroimaging and neuropsychiatric findings in adult FMR1 premutation were selected. All potential differences in interpretation between the reviewers were discussed to ensure that all the articles reviewed presented a satisfactory level of evidence.
This study is a review of previously published data and, as such, does not require ethics approval. The data were not used for any purpose other than those of the original study, and no new data were collected.
Results
Synthesis of Qualitative Studies
A total of 3,229 studies were identified from the initial search. After de-duplication and initial screening, 1,933 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 7 were included in this review (Figure 1, Table 1) (5–11).
Table 1
| Author and Year | Participants | Cognitive test | Psychological test | Molecular measures | Imaging (MRI) | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hessl et al. (5) | 12 FMR1 premutation males without FXTAS 13 male controls | WAIS-III | SCL-90-R | CGG repeat size FMR1 mRNA | Amygdala volumes Total cranial volume Total brain volume fMRI face processing task | Eye blink response to fear-potentiated startle (EMG activity of orbicularis oculi) Skin conductance during social greeting (electrodermal electrodes) |
| Koldewyn et al. (6) | 11 FMR1 premutation males without FXTAS 11 male controls | WAIS-III | SCL-90-R | CGG repeat size FMR1 mRNA | fMRI recall task Total brain volume Hippocampal volume | - |
| Adams et al. (7) | 16 FMR1 premutation female with FXTAS 17 FMR1 premutation female without FXTAS 8 female controls 34 FMR1 premutation male with FXTAS 21 FMR1 premutation male without FXTAS 30 male controls | WAIS-III | SCL-90-R | CGG repeat size FMR1 mRNA methylation status activation ratio | Total brain volume Hippocampal volume | FXTAS clinical staging |
| Hashimoto et al. (8) | 31 FMR1 premutation male with FXTAS 24 FMR1 premutation male without FXTAS 28 male controls | Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale 2 Working Memory Score of the WAIS-III | SCL-90-R | CGG repeat size FMR1 mRNA | Voxel-based morphometry analysis | FXTAS clinical staging |
| Hessl et al. (9) | 23 FMR1 premutation male without FXTAS 25 male controls | WAIS-III | Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Module 4 SRS (adult version) | CGG repeat size FMR1 mRNA methylation status FMRP levels | Amygdala volume Total cerebral volume fMRI targeting the amygdala with an emotion processing task and concurrent infra-red eye tracking | - |
| Selmeczy et al. (10) | 49 FMR1 premutation male without FXTAS 48 male controls | WAIS-III | SCL-90-R | CGG repeat size FMR1 mRNA | Amygdala volume Total cerebral volume | - |
| Brown et al. (11) | 17 FMR1 premutation male without FXTAS 17 male controls | KBIT | SCL-90-R AQ EQ Ekman Faces Test (version 1.0) | CGG repeat size | Emotional processing fMRI task to examine the response to a change in emotional arousal | - |
Summary of the reviewed studies.
SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist-90—Revised; WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Third Edition); KBIT, Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (Second Edition); AQ, Autism Spectrum Quotient; EQ, Empathy Quotient; SRS, Social Responsiveness Scale.
Represented in these manuscripts were views from 413 study participants (244 FMR1 premutation carriers and 169 control individuals) from 2 countries (UK, USA). Participants included adult men and women ranging in age from 18 to over 79 years. FMR1 premutation carriers were recruited through screening of pedigrees of probands with FXS with a CGG repeat size ranging from 55 CGGs to 199 CGGs. All subjects who participated in Koldewyn et al. (6) also participated in the Hessl et al. (5) study and, therefore, were counted only once. Such relation was not mentioned in the rest of the studies. One study (11) included 3 FMR1 premutation mosaic participants and 1 intermediate allele participant within the premutation group and, thus, was not considered when evaluating the CGG range (Table 2).
Table 2
| Study (Country) | Control population | FMR1premutation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | Age (years old) | Ethnicity | CGGs repeat size | Medical history | Number of participants | Age (years old) | Ethnicity | CGGs repeat size | Medical history | |
| Hessl et al. (5) (USA) | N = 11 (all men) | 26–55 | 2 Hispanic 1 East Indian 8 Caucasian | 17–32 | Neurological examination normal 1 participant on venlafaxine and buproprion | N = 11 (all men) | 28–56 | 2 Hispanic 9 Caucasian | 57–166 | Neurological examination normal 2 participants on amitriptyline |
| Koldewyn et al. (6) (USA) | Same participants as Hessl et al. (5) | |||||||||
| Adams et al. (7) (USA) | N = 38 (8 females, 30 males) | Female: 50.63 ± 11.43 (mean ± SD) Male: 57.20 ± 14.12 (mean ± SD) | NA | Female: 32 ± 6.89 (mean ± SD) Male: 28.42 ± 4.82 (mean ± SD) | No significant difference in psychotropic medication taken | N = 88 (16 female with FXTAS, 17 Female without FXTAS, 34 male with FXTAS, 21 male without FXTAS) | Female with FXTAS: 57.50 ± 12.46 (mean ± SD) Female without FXTAS: 44.94 ± 11.23 (mean ± SD) Male with FXTAS: 66.44 ± 6.77 (mean ± SD) Male without FXTAS: 52.38 ± 12.11 (mean ± SD) | NA | Female with FXTAS: 95.19 ± 14.18 (mean ± SD) Female without FXTAS: 96.40 ± 20.17 (mean ± SD) Male with FXTAS: 92.76 ± 18.86 (mean ± SD) Male without FXTAS: 88.52 ± 32.33 (mean ± SD) | 75% of females with FXTAS and 41.2% of males with FXTAS on psychotropic medication |
| Hashimoto et al. (8) (USA) | N = 28 (all men) | 40–79 | NA | 17–34 | Neurological examination normal | N = 55 (31 male with FXTAS, 24 male without FXTAS) | Male with FXTAS: 47–79 Male without FXTAS: 41–78 | NA | Male with FXTAS: 59–130 Male without FXTAS: 55–166 | NA |
| Hessl et al. (9) (USA) | N = 25 (all men) | 30.12 ± 7. 5 (mean ± SD) | 68.5% Caucasian | 19–33 | Neurological examination normal 33.3% Psychoactive medication | N = 23 (all men) | 32.95 ± 8.89 (mean ± SD) | 82.6% Caucasian | 55–199 | Neurological examination normal 28.6% Psychoactive medication |
| Selmeczy et al. (10) (USA) | N = 48 (all men) | 19–76 | NA | 17–42 | Neurological examination normal | N = 49 (all men) | 18–78 | NA | 55–199 | Neurological examination normal |
| Brown et al. (11) (UK) | N = 17 (all men) | 24–68 | NA | 19–40 | Neurological examination normal | N = 17 (all men) | 24–68 | NA | 58–185 3 premutation mosaic (150 ± 5; ~200 ± 10), (133, 156; 198 ± 10), (148 ± 5; ~200) 1 Intermediate allele (50 CGGs) | Neurological examination normal |
Study participant characteristics.
All but one of the seven studies were performed in male population, whereas only one included both male and female permutation carriers. Four of them used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), five of them used volumetric measures and one used voxel-based morphometry. It is important to note that comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, such as the mood of participants when performing tasks, were not considered, or at least not mentioned in any of the reviewed studies. Moreover, some of the participants enrolled in the studies were medicated with different drugs (Table 2), which might act as a potential confounding factor, and finally had an effect on the neuroimaging findings.
The synthesis of the 7 neuroimaging studies identified the amygdala and the hippocampus as the two major brain areas involved with FXAND. Table 3 summarizes results reported in the 7 studies.
Table 3
| Study | Psychological findings | Neuroimaging findings | Molecular findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hessl et al. (5) | Diminished autonomic responsivity to social–emotional stimuli | Diminished amygdala activation No differences in amygdala volume | Positive correlation with increased FMR1 mRNA levels |
| Koldewyn et al. (6) | Significantly worse performance on an immediate memory recall test but not on the in-scanner recall task 24 h later | Reduced left hippocampal activation and increased right parietal activation No differences in hippocampal volume | Positive correlation with increased FMR1 mRNA levels No significant correlation with the CGG repeat number |
| Adams et al. (7) | Increased psychological symptoms in FMR1 premutation carriers with FXTAS (obsessive–compulsive behaviors, somatization and anxiety) | Significant negative correlations between hippocampal volume and psychological symptoms | Negative correlation between CGG repeat size and total and left hippocampal volume in males with FXTAS. Negative correlation between CGG repeat length and right hippocampal volume in females with FXTAS Positive correlation between FMR1 mRNA levels and left hippocampal volume in female carriers without FXTAS. |
| Hashimoto et al. (8) | Increased levels of obsessive–compulsiveness and depression Poor working memory performance | Gray matter loss in the left amygdala Decreased gray matter in the left inferior frontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex | Significant negative effect of CGG repeat size on gray matter density in the dorsomedial frontal regions |
| Hessl et al. (9) | Higher ratings of communication and reciprocal social behavior symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (althought not significant) | Significantly smaller left and right amygdala volume during an emotion-matching task Reduced right amygdala activation during the task | Reduced FMRP as the primary factor involved in alterations of brain activity and behavior |
| Selmeczy et al. (10) | No difference on the global severity index score of the SCL-90-R | No significant differences in amygdala volume | Significant negative correlation between amygdala volume and CGG repeat expansions was found in the lower, but not in the higher, range of CGG repeat expansions |
| Brown et al. (11) | Significantly worse symptoms of neuropsychiatric symptomatology of obsessive-compulsiveness, anxiety, global psychiatric severity and positive symptom distress levels Higher levels of autistic traits Impaired facial emotion recognition | Significantly lower activation at the bilateral superior parietal lobes, bilateral Brodmann Area (BA) 17 (primary visual cortex), right intraparietal area and right BA18 (visual association area) when comparing high and low arousal conditions | Not examined |
Summary of the psychological, neuroimaging and molecular findings reported in FMR1 premutation carriers compared to control population in the papers reviewed.
Amygdala
The relationship between both the amygdala function and volume with psychological symptoms has been evaluated in several studies.
Regarding the amygdala function, male premutation carriers without FXTAS have been found to have decreased amygdala activation to emotional inputs which correlate with an increase of psychological symptoms. In 2007, Hessl et al. (5) described a negative correlation between psychological symptoms and amygdala activation compared to controls during an fMRI task consistent in passively viewing fearful vs. scrambled faces. Moreover, they also found that FMR1 premutation participants had decreased potentiation of the eye blink startle reflex to fearful faces, which is an indirect evidence of reduced amygdale activation, and diminished skin conductance response during a brief social stressor; evidencing reduced sympathetic activation. Similarly, Hessl et al. (9) described a negative correlation between higher ratings of autism spectrum symptoms and reduced left amygdala activation during an emotion processing fMRI task.
The reduced amygdala activation in FMR1 premutation carriers has been associated with abnormal elevation of FMR1 mRNA (5) and in particular, with reduced FMRP levels (9).
As for the amygdala volume and its correlation with psychological symptoms, results are controversial. While some studies did not find differences between groups in the amygdala volume and psychological symptoms (measured on the SCL-90-R) or cognitive ability (based on full scale IQ) (5, 10), others reported higher ratings of autism spectrum symptoms correlated with smaller bilateral amygdala volume (9). Additionally, Hashimoto et al. (8) demonstrated that increased levels of obsessive–compulsiveness and depression in male premutation carriers was associated with gray matter loss in the left amygdala evaluated by voxel-based morphometry. A plausible explanation for these discordant results might be the different neuroimaging methods used in each study. Whereas, Selmeczy et al. (10) used both 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI, the study conducted by Hessel et al. (9) only used a 3.0 T structural imaging.
Interestingly, even though Selmeczy et al. (10) found no difference between groups in the amygdala volume, a significant negative correlation was found between amygdala volume and the lower range of CGG repeat expansion (CGG≥55 and <85), but not in the higher range of CGG repeat expansion (CGG≥85). This observation raises the intriguing possibility that different molecular mechanisms could be affecting the brain structure, and potentially the function, in FMR1 premutation carriers depending on the CGG repeat expansion size.
Hippocampus
The relationship between psychological symptoms and hippocampal function and volume in FMR1 premutation carriers has also been examined.
Reduced hippocampal activation during an fMRI memory recall task has been associated to psychiatric symptomology in FMR1 premutation male carriers without FXTAS (6). Moreover, this reduction was found in association with parietal over-activation, which might be a feedback effect to compensate the decreased hippocampal involvement, and abnormal elevation of FMR1 mRNA.
A hippocampal volume effect has been associated with FMR1 premutation, albeit some inconsistent findings. While Jäkälä et al. (12) found reduced volumes; Loesch et al. (13) described increased volumes in this region in premutation carriers. On the other hand, Koldewyn et al. (6) did not find hippocampal volume effects associated with the premutation. The lack of consistent findings between these three studies may be due to specific cohort effects, especially if these cohorts included participants with and without FXTAS.
To our knowledge, only two papers explored the relationship between psychological measures and hippocampal size. While Koldewyn et al. (6) did not find hippocampal volume differences, Adams et al. (7) found a significant negative correlation between total hippocampal volume and anxiety in female carriers with and without FXTAS. This association seemed to be mainly driven by the right hippocampus since correlations were stronger. The association in male permutation carriers was weaker and was only significant for one of the psychological problems assessed (paranoid ideation). Furthermore, they found a negative correlation between CGG repeat size and total and left hippocampal volume in males with FXTAS and a similar correlation with CGG repeat length and right hippocampal volume in females with FXTAS (7).
Other Findings
The selected studies also showed other structural findings in FMR1 premutation carriers, even though there was no correlation with psychological symptoms. First, total brain volume has been found to be significantly decreased in older permutation carriers (13). Secondly, gray matter loss has also been examined in several studies: all of them evidencing reduced density in several brain regions in the permutation group. In this regard, Hashimoto et al. (8) reported significant gray matter loss in medial temporal lobe structures and cerebellar areas, such as the vermis lobule VII, and the cerebellar hemisphere lobule IX, as well as in multiple regions outside the cerebellum that have been related with several psychiatric conditions. Although significant loss was found when comparing the permutation group with controls, the correlation analysis failed to show significant association between all these areas and psychiatric problems in FMR1 premutation carriers. Finally, Brown et al. (11) found that permutation carriers exhibited significantly lower BOLD activation compared to controls at the bilateral superior parietal lobe, bilateral Brodmann Area (BA) 17 (V1) (primary visual cortex), right intraparietal area, and right BA18 (V2) (visual association area), when comparing high and low arousal conditions. However, no correlations were found between more psychiatric symptoms and higher levels of autistic traits observed in carriers and BOLD activation at the emotional processing fMRI task.
Study Limitation
Overall, the studies herein reviewed provided valuable neuroimaging data of brain abnormalities in FMR1 premutation carriers related to neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the majority of them were conducted on small sample sizes of groups, which might have limited detection of true significances. Moreover, some of them included FMR1 premutation carriers with FXTAS which might also influence significant results. In addition, the neuroimaging methods used were different, which makes it difficult to compare results. It should also be noted that fMRI is a complex technique that can be influenced by many factors such as the paradigm design (the manner of stimulating the brain in order to obtain meaningful information), magnetic field strength, MRI acquisition parameter and subject collaboration. Furthermore, the parameters that have an influence in blood flow and oxygenation have an impact on fMRI signal and, overall, fMRI has a challenging data interpretation (14). Finally, there are several variables that have to be taken into account as potential confounding factors in all the studies reviewed. Aspects such as comorbid medical conditions, medication taken by the participants (psychotropic or psychoactive) or unmeasured (unobserved) factors, such as the mood or the stress of participants, could have influenced the results. The reviewed studies were aware of these aspects and tried to minimize their effect by matching FMR1 premutation and control groups, although this was not always possible.
Discussion
FMR1 premutation carriers are at risk of developing an adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder named FXTAS (20). In addition, several studies reveal that young FMR1 premutation carriers are at increased risk for psychiatric conditions, memory problems and executive deficits (15–18). Indeed, brain function is also affected by FMR1 premutation status in relatively young premutation carriers without FXTAS who demonstrate no overt neurological symptoms (5, 6, 9, 11). Contrary to movement-related neurodegeneration, which increases over time, emotional symptoms seem to be consistent over the lifespan in FMR1 premutation carriers; suggesting a neurodevelopmental origin, different from the neurodegeneration seen in FXTAS (7, 11, 19).
FMR1 premutation carriers have elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA and can also have some degree of FMR1 protein (FMRP) deficiency, mainly at the high end of the FMR1 premutation range (20). FMRP is an RNA binding protein that regulates the translation of many gene products and has been implicated in dendritic maturation and in the formation of axons and myelin (21–23). In fact, FMRP activity is regulated in response to neuronal activity, and is an important mediator of synapse development, synaptic plasticity, learning and memory (reviewed in (52)). The mRNA targets of FMRP have received additional attention due to their enrichment for genes harboring risk to psychiatric disorders (24). Recently, Clifton et al. (52) has reported that a substantial proportion of FMRP targets have functions related to synaptic activity, anatomy or development. The association between synaptic plasticity and psychiatric disorders has been well-established with several genetic and functional studies describing the relevance of imbalanced of excitation and inhibition (25). FMRP levels have been reported to be reduced in FMR1 premutation brains of a mouse model (26), as well as in patients with psychiatric disorders such as autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder (27). Whilst some studies had found a relationship between FMR1 mRNA levels and psychiatric symptomology or brain function in FMR1 premutation carriers (5, 6, 28), others have pointed out a stronger relationship with reduced FMRP levels (9). Taking into consideration the importance of FMRP in normal neurodevelopment and its association with psychiatric disorders, there is the possibility that moderate reductions in FMRP levels could play a role in the behavioral dysfunction seen in FMR1 premutation carriers.
Both structural and functional changes in the hippocampus and amygdala have been found to be altered in FMR1 premutation carriers and some studies have proved a relationship between such changes and psychiatric symptomatology (5–9). However, while functional changes have been consistently reported (5, 6, 9, 11), volumetric measures showed some inconsistent results, with some studies showing increase, decrease, or no significant differences between hippocampal and amygdala volumes or voxel density in FMR1 premutation carriers (6, 10, 12, 13, 29–31). The lack of consistent findings between studies may be due to a cohort effect either in the size, the inclusion of participants with and without FXTAS, gender of participants or differences in the CGG repeat size. Moreover, technical aspects such as the volumetric techniques used, the image quality or segmentation technique followed might also contribute to explain discrepancies. However, and in consonance, findings of amygdala and hippocampal volumes in mood disorders such as depression or anxiety in non FMR1 premutation carriers have also been conflicting, with some studies reporting positive, negative and no associations (32–46).
Although an association between the above described structural and functional changes and molecular aspects of the FMR1 pemutation carriers has been proven in some of the studies reported (Table 3), there is still need to better define them. What does seem certain, and evidence points to it, is that the limbic system is a brain structure particularly susceptible to RNA toxicity. During normal fetal development, the hippocampus is one of the areas in which FMR1 transcription is the highest (47) and in adult human brain, the hippocampus demonstrates one of the highest expression rates of FMR1 mRNA (48). Similarly, FMR1 mRNA levels are disproportionately increased in the amygdala of FMR1 premutation carriers (48, 49). Moreover, in post-mortem brain studies of male FMR1 premutation carriers with FXTAS, it has been shown that, compared to other brain areas, the hippocampi harbors high density of intranuclear inclusions (22, 23). Additionally, the knock-in mouse model of the FMR1 premutation showed a significantly reduced FMRP expression in several brain regions, including the hippocampus (50).
Future studies with larger and more homogeneous sample size are needed in order to increase statistical power and validate such findings. Furthermore, longitudinal studies will be needed to evaluate progression of the neuroimaging and clinical findings. In addition, looking for modifying factors, either predisposing or protective factors, able to modulate neuroimaging, and clinical symptomatology is a key point for the knowledge and understanding of the disease. It is also crucial to clarify the metabolic causes of brain toxicity and to identify early presymptomatic brain changes that precede, but which are ultimately associated with neuropsychiatry disorders. Finally, further investigations that include quantitative measurements of molecular changes will be of great interest in order to clarify the relative roles of increased FMR1 mRNA and FMRP protein changes in the Fragile X-associated phenotypes.
Overall this review would like to encourage all FMR1 research groups furthering investigating the neuropsychiatric involvement in FMR1 premutation with testing other brain systems, with additional probes of brain function and a broader scope of psychiatric symptom measurement. The combination of all these missing data would help to obtain a comprehensive landscape of the neuropsychiatric phenotype associated with the FMR1 premutation
Funding
This work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI17/01067), co-financed by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) una manera de hacer Europa AGAUR from the Autonomous Catalan Government (2017SGR1134). The CIBER de Enfermedades Raras is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Files, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.728952/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
MilaMAlvarez-MoraMIMadrigalIRodriguez-RevengaL. Fragile X syndrome: an overview and update of the FMR1 gene. Clin Genet. (2018) 93:197–205. 10.1111/cge.13075
2.
Rodriguez-RevengaLMadrigalIPagonabarragaJXunclà MBadenasCKulisevskyJet al. Penetrance of FMR1 premutation associated pathologies in fragile X syndrome families. Eur J Human Genet. (2009) 17:1359–62. 10.1038/ejhg.2009.51
3.
ShermanSL. Premature ovarian failure in the fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet. (2000) 97:189–94. 10.1002/1096-8628(200023)97:3<
4.
HagermanRJProticDRajaratnamASalcedo-ArellanoMJAydinEYSchneiderA. Fragile X-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (FXAND). Front Psychiatry. (2018) 9:564. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00564
5.
HesslDRiveraSKoldewynKCordeiroLAdamsJTassoneFet al. Amygdala dysfunction in men with the fragile X premutation. Brain. (2007) 130:404–16. 10.1093/brain/awl338
6.
KoldewynKHesslDAdamsJTassoneFHagermanPJHagermanRJet al. Reduced hippocampal activation during recall is associated with elevated FMR1 mRNA and psychiatric symptoms in men with the Fragile X Premutation. Brain Imaging Behav. (2008) 2:105–16. 10.1007/s11682-008-9020-9
7.
AdamsPEAdamsJSNguyenDVHesslDBrunbergJATassoneFet al. Psychological symptoms correlate with reduced hippocampal volume in fragile X premutation carriers. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. (2010) 53B:775–85. 10.1002/ajmg.b.31046
8.
HashimotoRJavanAKTassoneFHagermanRJRiveraSM. A voxel-based morphometry study of grey matter loss in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Brain. (2011) 134:863–78. 10.1093/brain/awq368
9.
HesslDWangJMSchneiderAKoldewynKLeLIwahashiCet al. Decreased fragile X mental retardation protein expression underlies amygdala dysfunction in carriers of the fragile X premutation. Biol Psychiatry. (2011) 70:859–65. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.033
10.
SelmeczyDKoldewynKWangJMLeeAHarveyDHesslDRet al. Investigation of amygdala volume in men with the fragile X premutation. Brain Imaging Behav. (2011) 5:285–94. 10.1007/s11682-011-9132-5
11.
BrownSSGWhalleyHCKindPCStanfieldAC. Decreased functional brain response to emotional arousal and increased psychiatric symptomology in FMR1 premutation carriers. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. (2019) 285:9–17. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.01.011
12.
JäkäläPHänninenTRyynänenMLaaksoMPartanenKMannermaaAet al. Fragile-X: neuropsychological test performance, CGG triplet repeat lengths, hippocampal volumes. J Clin Invest. (1997) 100:331–8. 10.1172/JCI119538
13.
LoeschDZLitewkaLBrotchiePHugginsRMTassoneFCookM. Magnetic resonance imaging study in older fragile X premutation male carriers. Ann Neurol. (2005) 58:326–30. 10.1002/ana.20542
14.
SpechtK. Current challenges in translational and clinical fMRI and future directions. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 10:924. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00924
15.
AzizMStathopuluECalliasMTaylorCTurkJOostraBet al. Clinical features of boys with fragile X premutations and intermediate alleles. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. (2003) 121B:119–27. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20030
16.
FarzinFPerryHHesslDLoeschDCohenJBacalmanSet al. Autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in boys with the fragile X premutation. J Dev Behav Pediatr. (2006) 27:S137–44. 10.1097/00004703-200604002-00012
17.
HunterJEAllenEGAbramowitzARusinMLeslieMNovakGet al. No evidence for a difference in neuropsychological profile among carriers and noncarriers of the FMR1 premutation in adults under the age of 50. Am J Hum Genet. (2008) 83:692–702. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.10.021
18.
ChonchaiyaWAuJSchneiderAHesslDHarrisSWLairdMet al. Increased prevalence of seizures in boys who were probands with the FMR1 premutation and co-morbid autism spectrum disorder. Hum Genet. (2012) 131:581–9. 10.1007/s00439-011-1106-6
19.
BrownSSGBasuSWhalleyHCKindPCStanfieldAC. Age-related functional brain changes in FMR1 premutation carriers. Neuroimage Clin. (2017) 17:761–7. 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.016
20.
HagermanRHagermanP. Advances in clinical and molecular understanding of the FMR1 premutation and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Lancet Neurol. (2013) 12:786–98. 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70125-X
21.
InoueSBSiomiMCSiomiH. Molecular mechanisms of fragile X syndrome. J Med Invest. (2000) 47:101–7.
22.
GrecoCMHagermanRJTassoneFChudleyAEDel BigioMRJacquemontSet al. Neuronal intranuclear inclusions in a new cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome among fragile X carriers. Brain. (2002) 125:1760–71. 10.1093/brain/awf184
23.
GrecoCMBermanRFMartinRMTassoneFSchwartzPHChangAet al. Neuropathology of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Brain. (2006) 129:243–55. 10.1093/brain/awh683
24.
DarnellJCVan DriescheSJZhangCHungKYMeleAFraserCEet al. FMRP stalls ribosomal translocation on mRNAs linked to synaptic function and autism. Cell. (2011) 146:247–61. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.013
25.
HowardDMAdamsMJShiraliMClarkeTKMarioniREDaviesGet al. Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways. Nature Commun. (2018) 9:1470. 10.1038/s41467-018-03819-3
26.
QinMEntezamAUsdinKHuangTLiuZHHoffmanGEet al. A mouse model of the fragile X premutation: effects on behavior, dendrite morphology, and regional rates of cerebral protein synthesis. Neurobiol Dis. (2011) 42:85–98. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.008
27.
FatemiSHFolsomTD. The role of fragile X mental retardation protein in major mental disorders. Neuropharmacology. (2011) 60:1221–26. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.11.011
28.
HesslDTassoneFLoeschDZBerry-KravisELeeheyMAGaneLWet al. Abnormal elevation of FMR1 mRNA is associated with psychological symptoms in individuals with the fragile X premutation. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. (2005) 139B:115–21. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30241
29.
MooreCJDalyEMTassoneFTysoeCSchmitzNNgVet al. The effect of pre-mutation of X chromosome CGG trinucleotide repeats on brain anatomy. Brain. (2004) 127:2672–81. 10.1093/brain/awh256
30.
AdamsJSAdamsPENguyenDBrunbergJATassoneFZhangWet al. Volumetric brain changes in females with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Neurology. (2007) 69:851–9. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000269781.10417.7b
31.
WangJYHesslDHHagermanRJTassoneFRiveraSM. Age-dependent structural connectivity effects in fragile X premutation. Arch Neurol. (2012) 69:482–9. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.2023
32.
HajekTKopecekMKozenyJGundeEAldaMHöschlC. Amygdala volumes in mood disorders–meta-analysis of magnetic resonance volumetry studies. J Affect Disord. (2009) 115:395–410. 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.007
33.
SpampinatoMVWoodJNDe SimoneVGrafmanJ. Neural correlates of anxiety in healthy volunteers: a voxel-based morphometry study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2009) 21:199–205. 10.1176/jnp.2009.21.2.199
34.
IidakaTMatsumotoAOzakiNSuzukiTIwataNYamamotoYet al. Volume of left amygdala subregion predicted temperamental trait of harm avoidance in female young subjects. A voxel-based morphometry study. Brain Res. (2006) 1125:85–93. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.015
35.
HuYMooreMBertelsZPhanKLDolcosFDolcosS. Smaller amygdala volume and increased neuroticism predict anxiety symptoms in healthy subjects: a volumetric approach using manual tracing. Neuropsychologia. (2020) 145:106564. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.008
36.
Barrós-LoscertalesAMeseguerVSanjuánABellochVParcetMATorrubiaRet al. Behavioral inhibition system activity is associated with increased amygdala and hippocampal gray matter volume: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage. (2006) 33:1011–15. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.025
37.
BaurVHänggiJJänckeL. Volumetric associations between uncinate fasciculus, amygdala, trait anxiety. BMC Neurosci. (2012) 13:4. 10.1186/1471-2202-13-4
38.
PotvinOCathelineGBernardCMeillonCBerguaVAllardMet al. Gray matter characteristics associated with trait anxiety in older adults are moderated by depression. Int Psychogeriatr. (2015) 27:1813–24. 10.1017/S1041610215000836
39.
BlackmonKBarrWBCarlsonCDevinskyODuBoisJPogashDet al. Structural evidence for involvement of a left amygdala-orbitofrontal network in subclinical anxiety. Psychiatry Res. (2011) 194:296–303. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.05.007
40.
TakiYKinomuraSAwataSInoueKSatoKItoHet al. Male elderly subthreshold depression patients have smaller volume of medial part of prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus compared with age-matched normal subjects: a voxel-based morphometry. J Affect Disord. (2005) 88:313–20. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.08.003
41.
SpallettaGPirasFCaltagironeCFagioliS. Hippocampal multimodal structural changes and subclinical depression in healthy individuals. J Affect Disord. (2014) 152-154:105–12. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.068
42.
DotsonVMDavatzikosCKrautMAResnickSM. Depressive symptoms and brain volumes in older adults: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. J Psychiatry Neurosci. (2009) 34:367–75.
43.
O'SheaDMDotsonVMWoodsAJPorgesECWilliamsonJBO'SheaAet al. Depressive symptom dimensions and their association with hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volumes in community dwelling older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. (2018) 10:40. 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00040
44.
OslerMSørensenLRozingMCalvoOPNielsenMRostrupE. Subclinical depressive symptoms during late midlife and structural brain alterations: a longitudinal study of Danish men born in 1953. Hum Brain Mapp. (2018) 39:1789–95. 10.1002/hbm.23954
45.
GoveasJSEspelandMAHoganPDotsonVTarimaSCokerLHet al. Depressive symptoms, brain volumes and subclinical cerebrovascular disease in postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative MRI Study. J Affect Disord. (2011) 132:275–84. 10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.020
46.
SzymkowiczSMWoodsAJDotsonVMPorgesECNissimNRO'SheaAet al. Associations between subclinical depressive symptoms and reduced brain volume in middle-aged to older adults. Aging Mental Health. (2019) 23:819–30. 10.1080/13607863.2018.1432030
47.
AbitbolMMeniniCDelezoideALRhynerTVekemansMMalletJ. Nucleus basalis magnocellularis and hippocampus are the major sites of FMR-1 expression in the human fetal brain. Nature Genet. (1993) 4:147–53. 10.1038/ng0693-147
48.
TassoneFHagermanRJGarcia-ArocenaDKhandjianEWGrecoCMHagermanPJ. Intranuclear inclusions in neural cells with premutation alleles in fragile X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. J Med Genet. (2004) 41:e43. 10.1136/jmg.2003.012518
49.
TassoneFIwahashiCHagermanPJ. FMR1 RNA within the intranuclear inclusions of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). RNA Biol. (2004) 1:103–5. 10.4161/rna.1.2.1035
50.
EntezamABiacsiROrrisonBSahaTHoffmanGEGrabczykEet al. Regional FMRP deficits and large repeat expansions into the full mutation range in a new Fragile X premutation mouse model. Gene. (2007) 395:125–34. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.02.026
51.
JohnsonKHerringJRichsteinJ. Fragile X Premutation Associated Conditions (FXPAC). Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:266. 10.3389/fped.2020.00266
52.
CliftonN. E.ReesE.HolmansP. A.et al. Genetic association of FMRP targets with psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry (2020). 10.1038/s41380-020-00912-2
Summary
Keywords
FXAND, neuropathology, FMR1 premutation, neuroimaging, functional studies
Citation
Elias-Mas A, Alvarez-Mora MI, Caro-Benito C and Rodriguez-Revenga L (2021) Neuroimaging Insight Into Fragile X-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Literature Review. Front. Psychiatry 12:728952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.728952
Received
22 June 2021
Accepted
17 September 2021
Published
15 October 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Randi Jenssen Hagerman, MIND Institute, UC Davis, United States
Reviewed by
Isabelle Esther Bauer, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States; Akira Monji, Saga University, Japan; Hideo Hagihara, Fujita Health University, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Elias-Mas, Alvarez-Mora, Caro-Benito and Rodriguez-Revenga.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Laia Rodriguez-Revenga lbodi@clinic.cat
This article was submitted to Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.