In the original article, the legends for Figures 1 and 2 were swapped.
Figure 1. Structural equation model of parental care (PBI), resilience (CD-RISC), perceived job stressors (BJSQ), and PPSR (BJSQ). Solid arrows indicate increased effects, dotted arrows indicate decreased effects, and a thin dotted line indicates a nonsignificant effect. Coefficients beside the lines are standardized. The latent variable “care” consists of paternal and maternal care. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Structural equation model of parental overprotection (PBI), resilience (CD-RISC), perceived job stressors (BJSQ), and PPSR (BJSQ). Solid arrows indicate increased effects and dotted arrows indicate decreased effects. Coefficients beside the lines are standardized. The latent variable “overprotection” consists of both paternal and maternal overprotection (OP). PBI, Parental Bonding Instrument; CD-RISC, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; BJSQ, Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
In the original article, there was an error. The quoted variables from the figure were wrong in the Results section. A correction has been made to Results, Structural Equation Model, paragraphs 2 and 4:
Model 1 for the latent variable of “parental overprotection” is shown in Figure 2 and the results are also shown in Table 2. The fit indices of this model indicated a good fit (RMSEA = 0.012 and CFI = 1.000). The R2 for PPSR was 0.273, indicating that this model explains 27.3% of the variability in the PPSR scores. Paternal overprotection and maternal overprotection contributed to the latent variable of “overprotection” to the same degree, as shown in Figure 2. Parental overprotection in childhood directly increased perceived job stressors and PPSR, and directly reduced resilience. Resilience directly reduced perceived job stressors and PPSR.
Model 2 for the latent variable of “parental care” is shown in Figure 1, and the results are also shown in Table 3. The fit indices of this model indicated a good fit (RMSEA = 0.000 and CFI = 1.000). The R2 for PPSR was 0.255, indicating that this model explains 25.5% of the variability in PPSR scores. Maternal care contributed to the latent variable of “care” in Figure 1 more than paternal care. Parental care in childhood directly decreased PPSR and directly increased resilience. The effect of parental care on perceived job stressors was not statistically significant. Resilience directly reduced perceived job stressors and PPSR.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
perceived parental bonding, parental care, parental overprotection, resilience, work stress, structural equation model
Citation
Sameshima H, Shimura A, Ono K, Masuya J, Ichiki M, Nakajima S, Odagiri Y, Inoue S and Inoue T (2021) Corrigendum: Combined Effects of Parenting in Childhood and Resilience on Work Stress in Nonclinical Adult Workers From the Community. Front. Psychiatry 12:742812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.742812
Received
16 July 2021
Accepted
23 August 2021
Published
16 September 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited and reviewed by
Takeshi Terao, Oita University, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Sameshima, Shimura, Ono, Masuya, Ichiki, Nakajima, Odagiri, Inoue and Inoue.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Akiyoshi Shimura sim@tokyo-med.ac.jp
This article was submitted to Psychopathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.