Trauma treatment outcomes for PTSD in refugee and asylum-seeking minors with uncertain residence status: a systematic review

Introduction: Refugee and asylum-seeking minors with an uncertain residence status are at risk of being refused treatment for PTSD due to claims that residence stability is required for a successful outcome.

Objective: To synthesize research on the effectiveness of trauma treatment for PTSD in refugee and asylum-seeking minors with an uncertain residence status. Further objectives were to investigate whether there is any evidence that an uncertain residence status predicts treatment outcome and adherence to the treatment.

Methods: Data searches were performed in Cinahl, Cochrane Library, PsychINFO and PubMed. A total of 741 articles were screened for eligibility, of which 23 were included in the systematic review.

Results: Significant reductions in PTSD symptoms were reported in 17 of the 23 studies (2 RCTs and 16 NRSIs). The median effect size, reported in 11 studies was high, 0.97 (IQR 0.44 -1.23). No adverse effects were reported. The trauma treatment forms were mainly CBT, NET and EMDR. There was very little evidence to support whether an uncertain residence status would be a factor that predicts treatment outcomes or adherence to treatment. On average, adherence to treatment was 76%.

Conclusion: Trauma treatment, such as CBT, NET and EMDR, for minors living under uncertain residence status can reduce levels of PTSD symptoms with a moderate to high effect size. The result thereby challenges the notion that residence stability is required for a successful trauma treatment outcome.

1 Introduction

About 48,8 million minors worldwide had been displaced due to conflict or violence at the end of 2024 of whom 19,1 million are refugees and asylum-seekers (1). Many of these minors have been exposed to traumatic events that can occur premigration, perimigration, and/or postmigration such as loss of family and separation, war, sexual violence, and torture. Stressors that minors can experience postmigration are stigma, discrimination, challenges navigating the healthcare system, and an uncertain residence status (2, 3). Minors often live under uncertain legal status in the countries they have migrated to, and the process for obtaining a permanent residence status is usually protracted leaving them living in uncertainty up to several years (4). The prevalence of mental disorders is higher in refugee and asylum-seeking minors compared to the general population. Previous reviews have reported prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from 19 to 53% (5, 6). Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) include symptoms such as re-experiencing the trauma, intrusion, e.g. having nightmares and flashbacks, avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, negative thoughts and feelings, increased arousal and reactivity e.g. hypervigilance, difficulty concentrating and sleeping, irritability and aggression (7). Uncertain residence status is one of the significant predictors for PTSS in refugee minors (8, 9). A previous study showed that minors with an uncertain residence status had a 76% higher risk of getting a PTSD diagnosis (9). Therefore, screening for and treating PTSD in this population is critical (10). Research has shown that PTSD in minors can result in abnormal development of the brain with a concomitant reduced emotion regulation and increased threat signaling activity as the child ages (11). In fact, a meta-analysis concluded that minors who had been exposed to childhood trauma displayed altered brain activity in functions such as cognitive and emotional processing regardless of a PTSD diagnosis when compared to controls (12). The long-term impact of PTSD can be fatal. A large cohort-study found that PTSD doubles the risk of suicide from the age of 14 (13). The detrimental effects of PTSD in minors constitute a strong foundation for appropriate screening and treatment. Furthermore, the Convention on the Rights of the Child states that children, regardless of their migration status, have a right to access healthcare and rehabilitation (Article 24), and that state parties should take actions to promote physical and psychological recovery for children that have been exposed to any form of violence or armed conflicts (Article 39) (14). Yet, there are children in asylum-processes that are refused treatment of PTSD by psychiatry units due to the belief that residence stability is a prerequisite for a successful treatment outcome (15). Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to synthesize research on the effectiveness of trauma treatment for PTSD in refugee and asylum-seeking minors (children and adolescents) with an uncertain residence status. Secondary objectives were to investigate, where studies explicitly measured and reported such associations, whether there is any evidence that an uncertain residence status predicts treatment outcomes and adherence. Accordingly, this systematic review addressed the following research questions: (1) In refugee and asylum-seeking minors living under uncertain residence conditions, what is the evidence that trauma-focused interventions reduce PTSD symptoms? (2) To what extent does residence status influence treatment outcomes and adherence, where this is examined in the included studies?

2 Methods

2.1 Design

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (16).

2.2 Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria were studies evaluating trauma treatment targeting PTSD symptoms including minors < 18 years living under uncertain residence conditions as part of or the whole study sample. Original articles published in English or Swedish from 2004 to 2024 were considered for inclusion. The start year (2004) was selected based on initial scoping searches indicating that eligible studies first appeared from the mid-2000s, with the earliest included study published in 2004. By limiting the review to the last 20 years, we aimed to obtain relevant evidence to current clinical practice as well as the contemporary residence-status praxis of host countries. Exclusion criteria were studies that did not specifically address PTSD or lacked information about the participants’ residence status. Studies that only included adults were excluded.

2.3 Search strategy and data collection

Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy combined subject headings and free text search words in four search blocks according to PICOC. Population: children/adolescents, Intervention: trauma intervention, Comparison: No predefined comparator was utilized in this study; Outcome: PTSD and Context: uncertain residence status (refugees/asylum seekers). A full account of the search strings is displayed in Supplementary Material 1. In total, 741 studies were screened for eligibility of which 23 studies were included in the review. The detailed screening process is displayed in Figure 1. All steps in the screening process were conducted by both authors, independently and blinded, via the tool Covidence. Any discrepancies were discussed to reach consensus.

Figure 1

Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the screening process.

2.4 Risk of bias assessment

Risk of bias was determined by using the revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB2-tool) for the RCT-studies or risk of bias in non-randomized studies (Robins-1 V2) (17, 18). Data extraction from all included studies was performed independently by both authors, and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

2.5 Data extraction and data synthesis

Data extraction was performed by both authors and concerned amongst others, study characteristics, type of intervention, and outcome. Details of which data that were extracted are shown in Tables 1, 2. The data was first tabulated and then synthesized regarding the outcome of the studies and adherence to the treatment. If any association between uncertain residence status and prediction on treatment were reported that was also synthesized. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the studies. The outcome of the studies was synthesized regarding statistical significance and effect size, if reported. The effect size, by using the standardized metric of Cohen’s d, was synthesized by summarizing effect estimates in median, interquartile range and range (19). As Hedge’s g adjusts for a smaller sample size and is very comparable to Cohen’s d, both estimates were summarized together. The intervention effect was also grouped according to type of intervention.

Table 1

Table 1. Overview of population characteristics.

Table 2

Table 2. Summary of Intervention Types and Treatment Outcomes.

3 Results

3.1 Risk of bias

Seventeen studies implemented a non-randomized quasi-experimental design with within-subject measurements pre- and post-treatment. Two of them were assessed as having a serious risk of bias in respect to confounding (20), as well as selection of participants, and missing data (21). The remaining non-randomized studies were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias (Figures 2A, B). Six studies implemented a randomized controlled design, where one was a cluster randomized trial. All of them were assessed as having some concerns about risk of bias, particularly regarding the randomization process, deviation from intended intervention, as well as measurement of outcome (Figures 3A–C).

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) ROBINS-I traffic light plot. (B) ROBINS-I summary plot.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) ROB2 traffic light plot. (B) ROB2 summary plot. (C) ROB2-Cluster traffic light plot.

3.2 Study characteristics

This systematic review included 23 studies published between 2004 and 2024. The publication timeline was uneven, with only a small number of studies in the mid-2000s and a larger concentration of studies published during the last decade (20–42). (Table 1) Studies were predominantly conducted in Europe, particularly Germany (n=10), Sweden (n=3), the United Kingdom (n=2), and the Netherlands (n=2), with single studies from Finland, Norway, and Bulgaria (in collaboration with Germany). Three studies were conducted in the USA and one in Uganda.

3.3 Participants, outcome measurement tools and treatment settings

The total number of participants varied considerably across studies, ranging from as few as 4 (20) to 143 participants (28). Most studies involved adolescents, typically ranging from 12 to 18 years of age, although the overall age range was 4 to 21 years. Few studies included children under 7 years (24, 27, 32). Participants that exceeded the clinical cut-off for PTSD ranged from 34 to 100% at baseline when reported in the studies. The tools for measuring symptoms of PTSD varied between the studies. In total, there were 15 different tools where some studies applied two tools, for example one administered to caregivers and one administered to the minors for self-assessment. The tools used most frequently, n=5 respectively, were the 13-item Children’s Impact of Event Scale (CRIES-13) and the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen self-report (CATS-self) (Table 2). Gender distribution showed a clear predominance of male participants across most studies, with several studies involving exclusively male samples (e.g (28, 33, 40)). Some studies, however, reported a more balanced gender distribution, or predominantly female samples (25, 31, 32). Participants originated from diverse regions, primarily Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, and African countries such as Eritrea and Somalia. Studies conducted in the USA mostly involved refugees from Central and Latin American countries.

The studies were conducted in diverse treatment settings, explicitly tailored to the population’s unique circumstances and needs. Most interventions occurred in specialized mental health or psychotherapeutic outpatient clinics (e.g (26, 40)), child and adolescent welfare facilities (33–35), or community-based settings like schools, residential care homes, and asylum centers (22, 23, 38). Some studies employed outreach approaches, delivering therapy in the participants’ familiar environments, such as accommodations units or location chosen by the participants themselves (21, 41, 42). The involvement of intercultural mediators, interpreters, or multilingual therapists was explicitly reported in a number of studies (24, 41, 42). A few studies explicitly described treatment within schools or daycare centers (22, 23, 27).

3.4 Intervention types, intervention duration and follow-up

There was a variation of trauma treatment types in the studies, and they were grouped accordingly: 1) Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) (n=10), 2) Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) or KIDNET (n=3), 3) Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) or EMDR-combined (n=4), 4) Interventions with various forms of trauma treatment elements including psychoeducation, expressive arts and multi-family therapy (n=5). Intervention durations varied widely, typically involving weekly sessions lasting between 60 to 120 minutes. The most common formats included 6 to 10 weekly sessions. Shorter interventions consisted of intensive daily sessions lasting approximately one week (27), whereas more extended interventions involved weekly treatments lasting several months (29, 40). Follow-up measurements were conducted in approximately half of the studies (11 out of 23) whereas the rest only had post-intervention measurements. Follow-up ranged from short periods of 2 weeks to intermediate follow-up of 2–3 months or long-term follow-up to 25 months post-treatment (28).

3.5 Treatment outcomes

A detailed description of trauma treatment outcomes is presented in Table 2, and a summary for the different treatment types is displayed in Figure 4. Significant reductions in PTSD symptoms were reported in 17 of the 23 studies (2 RCTs and 16 NRSIs). Of the studies that did not show any statistically significant reductions in the total level of PTSD symptoms there was one study that reported significant reductions in specific PTSD symptoms, such as intrusion and arousal (24), and one RCT-study that reported significant reductions when a within-group analysis was performed (26). Six studies reported maintained effects at follow-ups from 3 to 25 months (26–28, 30, 34, 35) whereas one study that showed significant short-term improvements did not maintain the effect at follow-up (22). Some studies only reported qualitative improvements without statistically significant quantitative results (21, 25, 42). Eleven studies reported effect sizes, in Cohen’s d (n=9) or Hedge’s g (n=2), where the median effect size was high, 0.97 (IQR 0.44 -1.23). The total range of effect size was between moderate to high (0.33 to 1.9) (Figure 5).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effect from different types of trauma treatment.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Effect size in Cohen’s d for reduction in PTSD symptoms, n=11 studies.

3.5.1 Cognitive behavioral therapy

Ten studies reported using CBT (n=8 TF-CBT, n=1 school-based CBT, n=1 mindfulness-based CBT). Of these studies, nine reported statistically significant reductions in PTSD symptoms (22, 23, 32–35, 38–40). Three studies showed a sustained effect from two to six months after treatment (34, 35, 40). One study did not perform a statistical analysis and only reported a total score decrease in PTSD symptoms up to four months after treatment (36).

3.5.2 Narrative exposure therapy

Three studies used NET where two used the child-friendly version KIDNET and one NET. All studies reported significant reductions in PTSD symptoms post-intervention (20, 30, 37) that was maintained after 9 to 12 months in two of the studies (30, 37).

3.5.3 Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing

One study used EMDR as a single intervention (27). Two studies used EMDR in combination with TF-CBT and KIDNET (27, 41, 42). However, EMDR composed the main treatment (47% of the sessions), KIDNET (40% of the sessions) and TF-CBT (12% of the sessions) (41). One study used EMDR in combination with conversational therapy for adolescents or play therapy for children younger than 13 (31). Three out of four studies reported statistically significant reductions post-intervention in PTSD symptoms (27, 31, 41) where one study showed a sustained effect after 3 months (27).

3.5.4 Interventions with various forms of trauma treatment elements

Five studies had various forms of trauma treatment elements such as Stepped Care Model (SCM) (21, 26), parent-child evidence-based trauma stabilisation (EBTS) (24), multifamily group therapy (25) and expressive arts intervention (28). The studies with multifamily group therapy and expressive arts intervention showed significant reductions in PTSD symptoms (25, 28) where the latter had a significant time by group interaction over a 25-months period.

3.6 Residence uncertainty and prediction of treatment outcome and adherence

Residence uncertainty was addressed with considerable variability where some studies provided detailed descriptions of the asylum context and some studies mentioned uncertainty more generally. All studies included either asylum seekers or refugees. Most studies did not measure residence status as a factor that could influence treatment outcome. One study (40) reported subgroup comparisons relevant to residence stability with no significant differences at follow-up, and two others (25, 31) mentioned residence stability-related differences in treatment only descriptively and without a statistically tested moderated effect of treatment. However, some of the studies discussed uncertainty related to awaiting asylum decisions and the fear of rejection as major contextual stressors potentially affecting participants’ psychological well-being and treatment outcomes (25, 28, 31, 35, 41, 42). One study reported the best treatment outcomes in a subgroup of children living in stable family life situations. However, almost all children in the study, regardless of life situation reported improvements in treatment outcomes (31). Another study divided the sample in two subgroups with either minors with rejected asylum request or minors waiting for asylum hearing, waiting for asylum decision, or who had asylum granted at 6-months follow-up and found that the latter subgroup had maintained improvements even though some of them had not yet received a decision, whereas the subgroup that had its asylum request rejected showed more symptoms of PTSD. However, the difference was not statistically significant (40). Regarding adherence to treatment, few studies explicitly connected residence uncertainty with higher dropout rates or lower adherence, explicitly describing participants who left treatment prematurely due to uncertainty-related stressors, legal complications, or relocation (25, 28, 31, 40–42). Overall, reported in 18 studies, the adherence to the intervention was on average 76% ranging from 43,5 to 100%.

4 Discussion

This review specifically focused on refugee and asylum-seeking minors with an uncertain residence status and the effectiveness of PTSD treatment. In general, the results show that trauma treatment reduces PTSD symptoms despite an uncertain residence status, with about a fourth of the studies showing maintained effects at follow-ups from 3 to 25 months. Furthermore, no adverse effects were found. Thereby, the results somewhat challenge the notion that residence stability is necessary for a successful treatment outcome (15). Other reviews on refugee- and asylum-seeking minors, although not solely focusing on minors with an uncertain residence status, have also shown that trauma treatment can be effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in this population (43, 44). Although the number of publications increased in the later part of the 2004–2024 window, we did not observe a clear temporal trend in treatment effects. Reductions in PTSD symptoms were reported across the period with a higher number of reports published in the last decade. In our study, the specific type of treatments that successfully reduced PTSD symptoms in minors with an uncertain residence status were predominately conventional trauma treatments such as CBT, NET or KIDNET, and EMDR or EMDR combined with TF-CBT, KIDNET, conversational therapy, or play therapy. The results are in line with what has been found to be effective in the general paediatric population (45, 46). Further, our results show that other forms of trauma treatments, like multifamily group therapy and expressive arts intervention are also effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in minors with an uncertain legal status. Other research indicates the evidence for art therapy in reducing symptoms of PTSD to be inconclusive. A previous systematic review found the evidence to be insufficient in refugee children and youth (47), whereas another systematic review and meta-analysis did find creative arts-based interventions to significantly reduce symptoms of PTSD in children and adolescents that had been exposed to traumatic events (48). Multifamily group therapy seems to be a novel treatment for minors with uncertain residence status. A conceptual analysis has discussed potential benefits of such a treatment in the context of intergenerational psychotrauma (49), which may also be a phenomenon refugee and asylum-seeking minors are exposed to (50).

The studies in this review mainly included children over seven years of age and the majority were teenagers. Hence, the evidence for younger refugee and asylum-seeking children with an uncertain residence status is scarce. The lack of younger children in trauma treatment studies has been found in other systematic reviews as well, for instance in trauma treatment for children who survived torture (51). This underscores a knowledge gap that needs to be addressed in future research.

Based on our findings, we cannot unequivocally argue that residence status would negatively impact trauma treatment outcomes or adherence to treatment. In line with this, a study exploring factors influencing utilization of TF-CBT amongst unaccompanied young refugees showed that residence status did not impact intention to utilize or the actual utilization of mental health care (52). However, there could be cultural and structural barriers to mental health care, such as fear of discrimination and stigmatization as well as lack of information about previous health issues prior to the trauma. Hence, it is not always the refusal of the health care provider or a deportation decision that leaves the minors untreated for PTSD (53). That being said, it is the health care provider who is responsible for providing care and treatment for refugee and asylum-seeking minors as regulated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child for the states who have ratified the act (14). The results of this review support that trauma treatment is effective for minors with an uncertain residence status, and it could therefore be argued that such treatment should be offered to them to alleviate suffering regardless of whether a state has ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

4.1 Summary of study limitations and strengths

Several limitations must be considered when interpreting the feasibility and efficacy of PTSD treatment in minors from the studies in this review. First, residence status was rarely tested as a predictor of treatment response, which hinders drawing conclusions about its moderating impact. Second, most studies reported a lack of control groups, particularly those which implemented a design with pre-post measurements (Table 2). Third, a small sample size was commonly reported, with some studies including as few as four participants (Table 1). Fourth, approximately half of the studies did not follow up treatment outcome and most of those that did include a follow-up period, re-evaluated participants within six months of initial treatment. Only two studies included follow-up evaluations that extended over a year (Table 1). Fifth, several studies explicitly discussed potential biases arising from self-reported measures, lack of blinding, and potential cultural and language barriers. Sixth, although developmental stage is likely to matter, most studies in this review consisted of broad age ranges. Populations varied between 4–21 years, with most samples including minors between 12–18 years. Some studies adapted the interventions to fit the age of their samples (27, 31), but none of the included studies reported PTSD outcomes stratified by narrower developmental periods such as, preschool, school-age or adolescence, limiting developmentally specific conclusions. Seventh, there was heterogeneity in the studies. For instance, the measurement tools for symptoms of PTSD varied. However, there is no gold standard for measuring symptoms of PTSD. Several of the tools were based on the DMS-5 criteria for PTSD and demonstrate good reliability, however, measuring symptoms of PTSD in minors is more challenging (54, 55). Lastly, generalizability of the results is limited due to gender imbalance and origin of participants. Most samples included predominantly (some exclusively) male participants, and participants from Afghanistan, Syria and Eritrea (Table 1). On the other hand, the studies reviewed show certain methodological strengths. First, most studies reported a moderate to high adherence to treatment. Second, most of them used standardized instruments to measure PTSD. Third, the majority implemented manualized, replicable treatments such as CBT, KIDNET and EMDR (Table 2).

4.2 Conclusions

Trauma treatment, such as CBT, NET, and EMDR in minors living with uncertain residence status can reduce levels of PTSD symptoms with a moderate to high effect size and with no adverse effects. Moreover, the results could not conclude that residence status, as a sole factor, would predict the treatment outcome or adherence to treatment. These results thereby challenge the notion that residence stability is required for a successful trauma treatment outcome. Future research could focus on including younger children, an equal distribution of participants from both sexes, stratifying results based on developmental age, as well as longer follow-ups. The findings discussed in this review give health care providers a palette of different evidence-based trauma treatments that can be implemented to minors under uncertain residence status depending on what trauma treatment is practiced in their clinic and what is suitable for the specific context the minor is in.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

CN: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Hildur Nordin’s Memorial Fund.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1715650/full#supplementary-material

References

1. UNICEF. Child displacement and refugees. New York: UNICEF DATA (2025). Available online at: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-migration-and-displacement/displacement/ (Accessed September 2, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. Pieloch KA, McCullough MB, and Marks AK. Resilience of children with refugee statuses: A research review. Can Psychol. (2016) 57:330–9. doi: 10.1037/cap0000073

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hazer L and Gredebäck G. The effects of war, displacement, and trauma on child development. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. (2023) 10:909. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02438-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lelliott J. Unaccompanied children in limbo: the causes and consequences of uncertain legal status. Int J Refug Law. (2022) 34:1–30. doi: 10.1093/ijrl/eeac024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Blackmore R, Gray KM, Boyle JA, Fazel M, Ranasinha S, Fitzgerald G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: the prevalence of mental illness in child and adolescent refugees and asylum seekers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2020) 59:705–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.11.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kien C, Sommer I, Faustmann A, Gibson L, Schneider M, Krczal E, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in young refugees and asylum seekers in European Countries: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2019) 28:1295–310. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1215-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing (2022).

Google Scholar

8. Hornfeck F, Eglinsky J, Garbade M, Rosner R, Kindler H, Pfeiffer E, et al. Mental health problems in unaccompanied young refugees and the impact of post-flight factors on PTSS, depression and anxiety–A secondary analysis of the Better Care study. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1149634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149634

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Veeser J, Barkmann C, Schumacher L, Zindler A, Schön G, and Barthel D. Post-traumatic stress disorder in refugee minors in an outpatient care center: prevalence and associated factors. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2023) 32:419–26. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01866-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Gadeberg AK, Montgomery E, Frederiksen HW, and Norredam M. Assessing trauma and mental health in refugee children and youth: a systematic review of validated screening and measurement tools. Eur J Public Health. (2017) 27:439–46. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Herringa RJ. Trauma, PTSD, and the developing brain. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2017) 19:69. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0825-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ireton R, Hughes A, and Klabunde M. A functional magnetic resonance imaging meta-analysis of childhood trauma. Biol Psychiatry Cognit Neurosci Neuroimaging. (2024) 9:561–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.01.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fox V, Dalman C, Dal H, Hollander A-C, Kirkbride JB, and Pitman A. Suicide risk in people with post-traumatic stress disorder: A cohort study of 3.1 million people in Sweden. J Affect Disord. (2021) 279:609–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. UN General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of the Child Vol. 1577. . United Nations: Treaty Series (1989). p. 3.

Google Scholar

15. Warner G, Keeshin B, and Sarkadi A. Mapping trauma support onto the shifting landscape of seeking refuge in Sweden: insights from an ongoing programme of research on refugee minors’ mental health. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2021) 30:1995–6. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01592-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. (2016) 355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. (2019) 366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, and Welch VA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5 (updated August 2024). Chichester (UK): Cochrane (2024). Available online at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (Accessed June 20, 2025).

Google Scholar

20. Said G and King D. Implementing Narrative Exposure Therapy for unaccompanied asylum-seeking minors with post-traumatic stress disorder: A pilot feasibility report. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2020) 25:213–26. doi: 10.1177/1359104519864123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Garoff F, Kangaslampi S, and Peltonen K. Development and implementation of a group based mental health intervention for unaccompanied minors. Scand J Psychol. (2019) 60:7–15. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12497

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ehntholt KA, Smith PA, and Yule W. School-based Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy Group Intervention for Refugee Children who have Experienced War-related Trauma. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2005) 10:235–50. doi: 10.1177/1359104505051214

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fortuna LR, Martinez W, and Porche MV. Integrating spirituality and religious beliefs in a mindfulness based cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD with latinx unaccompanied immigrant children. J Child Adolesc Trauma. (2023) 16:481–94. doi: 10.1007/s40653-023-00541-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Gotseva-Balgaranova K, Popivanov ID, and Mutafchieva M. Impact evaluation of the evidence-based trauma stabilisation programme for refugee, asylum seeking and immigrant families. Z Psychodrama Soziom. (2020) 19:147–60. doi: 10.1007/s11620-020-00568-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hoskins D, Hernández M, Pérez A, Spampinato L, Tahir P, and Chang T. A novel multifamily treatment targeting symptoms related to Latinx caregiver deportation. Psychol Trauma. (2024) 16:S409–s16. doi: 10.1037/tra0001379

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Höhne E, Böge K, Karnouk C, Tschorn M, Banaschewski T, Hoell A, et al. Culturally sensitive stepped care for adolescent refugees: efficacy and cost-utility of a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2024) 33:581–93. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02179-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lempertz D, Wichmann M, Enderle E, Stellermann-Strehlow K, Pawils S, and Metzner F. Pre-post study to assess EMDR-based group therapy for traumatized refugee preschoolers. J EMDR Pract Res. (2020) 14:31. doi: 10.1891/1933-3196.14.1.31

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Meyer DeMott MA, Jakobsen M, Wentzel-Larsen T, and Heir T. A controlled early group intervention study for unaccompanied minors: Can Expressive Arts alleviate symptoms of trauma and enhance life satisfaction? Scand J Psychol. (2017) 58:510–8. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Möhlen H, Parzer P, Resch F, and Brunner R. Psychosocial support for war-traumatized child and adolescent refugees: evaluation of a short-term treatment program. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2005) 39:81–7. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01513.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Onyut LP, Neuner F, Schauer E, Ertl V, Odenwald M, Schauer M, et al. Narrative Exposure Therapy as a treatment for child war survivors with posttraumatic stress disorder: two case reports and a pilot study in an African refugee settlement. BMC Psychiatry. (2005) 5:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-5-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Oras R, de Ezpeleta SC, and Ahmad A. Treatment of traumatized refugee children with Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in a psychodynamic context. Nord J Psychiatry. (2004) 58:199–203. doi: 10.1080/08039480410006232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Patel ZS, Casline EP, Vera C, Ramirez V, and Jensen-Doss A. Unaccompanied migrant children in the United States: Implementation and effectiveness of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy. Psychol Trauma. (2024) 16:S389–s99. doi: 10.1037/tra0001361

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Pfeiffer E and Goldbeck L. Evaluation of a trauma-focused group intervention for unaccompanied young refugees: A pilot study. J Trauma Stress. (2017) 30:531–6. doi: 10.1002/jts.22218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Pfeiffer E, Sachser C, Rohlmann F, and Goldbeck L. Effectiveness of a trauma-focused group intervention for young refugees: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2018) 59:1171–9. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12908

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pfeiffer E, Sachser C, Tutus D, Fegert JM, and Plener PL. Trauma-focused group intervention for unaccompanied young refugees: “Mein Weg”-predictors of treatment outcomes and sustainability of treatment effects. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. (2019) 13:18. doi: 10.1186/s13034-019-0277-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Rondung E, Leiler A, Sarkadi A, Bjärtå A, Lampa E, Löfving SG, et al. Feasibility of a randomised trial of Teaching Recovery Techniques (TRT) with refugee youth: results from a pilot of the Swedish UnaccomPanied yOuth Refugee Trial (SUPpORT). Pilot Feasibility Stud. (2022) 8:40. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00998-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ruf M, Schauer M, Neuner F, Catani C, Schauer E, and Elbert T. Narrative exposure therapy for 7- to 16-year-olds: a randomized controlled trial with traumatized refugee children. J Trauma Stress. (2010) 23:437–45. doi: 10.1002/jts.20548

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sarkadi A, Ådahl K, Stenvall E, Ssegonja R, Batti H, Gavra P, et al. Teaching Recovery Techniques: evaluation of a group intervention for unaccompanied refugee minors with symptoms of PTSD in Sweden. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2018) 27:467–79. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1093-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Unterhitzenberger J, Eberle-Sejari R, Rassenhofer M, Sukale T, Rosner R, and Goldbeck L. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy with unaccompanied refugee minors: a case series. BMC Psychiatry. (2015) 15:260. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0645-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Unterhitzenberger J, Wintersohl S, Lang M, König J, and Rosner R. Providing manualized individual trauma-focused CBT to unaccompanied refugee minors with uncertain residence status: a pilot study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. (2019) 13:22. doi: 10.1186/s13034-019-0282-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. van Es CM, Sleijpen M, Velu ME, Boelen PA, van Loon RE, Veldman M, et al. Overcoming barriers to mental health care: multimodal trauma-focused treatment approach for unaccompanied refugee minors. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. (2021) 15:53. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00404-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Van Es CM, Velu ME, Sleijpen M, van der Aa N, Boelen PA, and Mooren T. Trauma-focused treatment for traumatic stress symptoms in unaccompanied refugee minors: a multiple baseline case series. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1125740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lawton K and Spencer A. A full systematic review on the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy for mental health symptoms in child refugees. J Immigr Minor Health. (2021) 23:624–39. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01151-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Oberg C and Sharma H. Post-traumatic stress disorder in unaccompanied refugee minors: prevalence, contributing and protective factors, and effective interventions: A scoping review. Children. (2023) 10. doi: 10.3390/children10060941

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gillies D, Maiocchi L, Bhandari AP, Taylor F, Gray C, and O’Brien L. Psychological therapies for children and adolescents exposed to trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2016) 10:Cd012371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.Cd012371

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. National Guideline Alliance (UK). Evidence reviews for psychological, psychosocial and other non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of PTSD in children and young people: Post-traumatic stress disorder: Evidence review B. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE (2018).

Google Scholar

47. Annous N, Al-Hroub A, and El Zein F. A systematic review of empirical evidence on art therapy with traumatized refugee children and youth. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:811515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811515

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Morison L, Simonds L, and Stewart SF. Effectiveness of creative arts-based interventions for treating children and adolescents exposed to traumatic events: a systematic review of the quantitative evidence and meta-analysis. Arts Health. (2022) 14:237–62. doi: 10.1080/17533015.2021.2009529

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Mooren T, van Ee E, Hein I, and Bala J. Combatting intergenerational effects of psychotrauma with multifamily therapy. Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:867305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867305

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Flanagan N, Travers A, Vallières F, Hansen M, Halpin R, Sheaf G, et al. Crossing borders: a systematic review identifying potential mechanisms of intergenerational trauma transmission in asylum-seeking and refugee families. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2020) 11:1790283. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1790283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Nahlén Bose C and Tamdjidi R. Children who survive torture: A systematic review of screening, documentation and treatment of torture injuries in children. Torture. (2024) 34:15–40. doi: 10.7146/torture.v34i3.143968

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kasparik B, Farani M, Pfeiffer E, Sachser C, and Rosner R. Investigating factors influencing utilization of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy among unaccompanied young refugees: an exploratory analysis. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. (2025) 19:7. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00862-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Fortuna LR and Porche MV. Upholding the human rights and well-being of refugee children through effective clinical care. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. (2024) 33:111–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2023.09.00354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Coeur E, Giaufer C, Robert P, and Corveleyn X. A systematic review of PTSD instruments: Psychometric properties and validity in DSM-5 and ICD-11 based tools. J Affect Disord. (2026) 394:120484. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120484

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Leigh E, Yule W, and Smith P. Measurement Issues: Measurement of posttraumatic stress disorder in children and young people - lessons from research and practice. Child Adolesc Ment Health. (2016) 21:124–35. doi: 10.1111/camh.12124

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar