COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness, and Leisure Activities: An International Study Protocol

Introduction

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, is one of the worst pandemics in human history and in the last 100 years, on a global scale and has resulted in ~21,294,845 (267,291—in the last 24 h) infected cases, and 761,799 deaths (5,985—in the last 24 h) (World Health Organization, 2020) with the statistics still on the rise. The pandemic has caused disruptions across the usual social and economic activities. Reducing physical contact, social gatherings and the complete lockdown have indirectly redefined the common practice of work, caregiving, support and social interaction.

To date, there is a growing body of scholarly research relating to the impact of COVID-19 and citizens across different countries and continents. This includes Ammar et al. (2020a,b,c) who deployed an online survey in seven languages to understand how this pandemic was impacting on the daily living and lives of citizens in relation to social distancing, isolation and home confinement. Furthermore, Bentlage et al. (2020) and Chtourou et al. (2020) who are members of the same project have explored and provided practical recommendations for maintaining an active lifestyle and physical activity during the pandemic. Such recommendations include exergaming, yoga, and home-based exercise, with appropriate amounts of intensity conducted for both adults and children.

Scholarly research surrounding the use, benefits and impacts of digital technology in the lives of older citizens, as well as those of younger citizens (Ito et al., 2010; Cotten et al., 2014; Marston, 2019) has been growing over the last 30+ years (Czaja and Barr, 1989). The application of digital technologies in influencing social and psychological well-being have been widely studied with the focus of the types of digital connections and the intensities of using digital technologies among general population (Rosenfeld and Thomas, 2012; Hofstra et al., 2017; Verduyn et al., 2017; Rafalow, 2018; Henwood and Marent, 2019; Shah et al., 2019). The demographic profiles of the users, such as age, gender and education are important factors to understand the accessibility, frequencies and types of digital use in creating and enhancing social connections and support.

When focusing on social isolation, loneliness and the digital divide, there is a myriad of scholarly research surrounding older adults and includes exploring older adults' attitudes toward technology adoption and use (Mitzner et al., 2010; Marston, 2012; O'brien et al., 2012; Fernández-Ardèvol and Ivan, 2015; Marston et al., 2016, 2019; Rosales and Fernández-Ardèvol, 2016a,b; Fernández-Ardèvol et al., 2017; Rosales et al., 2018; Fernández-Ardèvol, 2020), leisure activities (Genoe et al., 2018), supporting independence, social support and connectedness while reducing loneliness (Bouma et al., 2004; Cotten et al., 2013; Czaja et al., 2018; Schlomann et al., 2020), the digital divide and inequalities (Cotten et al., 2009; Gilleard et al., 2015; Lagacé et al., 2015; Friemel, 2016; Hargittai and Dobransky, 2017; Ball et al., 2019; Fernández-Ardèvol, 2019), telemedicine and emerging technologies for healthcare (Sixsmith and Sixsmith, 2000; Mitzner et al., 2012; Czaja et al., 2013; Sharit et al., 2019), and to support age-in-place (Mynatt et al., 2000, 2004; Beer et al., 2012; Marston and van Hoof, 2019; White et al., 2020).

Based on the growing literature highlighted above and in the next section, coupled with the rise of digital technologies in terms of social networking sites, virtual conferencing, etc. there is alternative thoughts and approaches to maintaining social connections and activities during the crisis. In general, this growth in scholarly research illustrates a fast-moving arena within the fields of sociology, general social sciences, computer science and gerontechnology. In addition to a series of national and international research projects focusing on the various impacts and roles that technology can play within society (Ivan et al., Accepted; Ivan and Hebblethwaite, 2016; Loos et al., 2018, 2019; Marston et al., 2019; Nimrod, 2019; Nimrod and Ivan, 2019; Gallistl and Nimrod, 2020).

The purpose and rationale of this paper is to describe a study protocol which includes a description of the Consortium members, the online instrument used for data collection, coupled with future work and dissemination activities. This study protocol details the urgency and the international response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We anticipate the preliminary findings will provide an insight into the use of digital technologies and the impacts of using digital technologies on psychological well-being and loneliness.

Background and Literature Review

Interdisciplinary Research Projects

In what follows we summarize previous projects that have targeted individuals through using online tools to collect data across different countries and individual's age-groups.

The ACT (aging + communication + technologies) project (ACT project, 2014–2021) is a Canadian-funded partnership that brings more than 45 international researchers, community partners and institutions together. By means of different pilot projects and case studies, ACT aims to explore and understand the transformational experiences of aging through various mediums of communication. It develops research in three main areas.

First, “Agency in Aging” encompasses a program of research that involves individuals and communities in the development of participatory action research projects in the field of the digital arts that have both scholarly and creative outcomes. Second, “Critical Mediations” examines the everyday life practices, the various mediated experiences of adults in later life, and the existing cultures of aging. Finally, “Telecommunication Technologies” investigates aging in the context of networked societies. Of interest to this paper are two cross-country projects, one which consists of an online longitudinal study about older audiences in the digital media environments and another, Grannies on the Net, about the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in grandmothers' interactions with close and distant social ties.

The online longitudinal research about older audiences in the digital media environments (2016–2020) (Loos et al., 2018, 2019) has revealed the rather diverse media practices (both digital and analog) and the heterogeneity of older online technology users among the six countries which are part of the project. This project underlines the importance of cross-national analysis when we talk about information communication technology (ICT) use by different generations. In analyzing data, researchers not only focused on the relation between well-being and media-based leisure of older adults (Gallistl and Nimrod, 2020) and on technology use by different generations of older adults (Ivan et al., Accepted), but also on media-displacement (Nimrod, 2019)–a process by which traditional media has been replaced to a more or lesser extent by the new media, in the way people communicate, get information, and solve everyday tasks.

The results of the Grannies on the Net project, which examines the role of ICTs in grandmothers' interactions with close and distant social ties, uncovered the varying motives and use strategies grandmothers deploy to communicate with a diversity of actors while revealing commonalities in the challenges they face in different cultural contexts. We tackled the role of ICT in reducing grandmothers' feeling of loneliness and their need to share everyday experiences with loved ones (Ivan and Hebblethwaite, 2016). Also, we analyzed the role ICT plays in older women's leisure (Nimrod and Ivan, 2019). On the one hand, it helps older women to remain active and socially engaged by saving time that could be used for their leisure, facilitating participation in various activities and allowing for a more meaningful leisure experiences both online and offline. On the other hand, ICT can often entail wasted time and disrupted involvement, or simply served as a “time filler.” The authors of this respective study conclude how the impact of ICT may vary across various age cohorts and gender, which in turn may impact the various leisure activities by the respective participants.

The Technology In Later Life (TILL) project (2015–2017) is a multi-centered, international study comprising of two countries (UK and Canada) and four sites: two rural (South Wales, UK McBride, BC) and two urban (Milton Keynes, UK and Regina, SK). The TILL study aimed to explore the use, perceptions and impacts of technology on adults aged 70+ years residing in these four geographic locations. The findings from the TILL study ascertained two main overarching themes. The first is “facilitators of technology”, which relates to the sharing of information by the respective participants, and for those participants who do use technology, the extent to which this afforded them a sense of security. The second theme is “detractors of technology”, which identified a sense of apprehension of using technology. Recommendations from the TILL study proposed the notion of promoting technology based on the strengths and positive opportunities to facilitate health and well-being. Secondly, a peer support network(s) should be considered and created to assist novice users in understanding how to use ICTs facilitated by experienced peer users.

The notion of exploring and understanding how intergenerational relationships can be enhanced and maintained via technology use was also suggested (Marston et al., 2019). From a leisure standpoint, Genoe et al. (2018) identified technology as a primary means of accessing leisure activities such as games, hobbies and maintaining social connections. However, those participants did note challenges including, difficulty in using and updating software, concerns surrounding privacy and security and their overall lack of confidence and interest. Although technology may facilitate leisure activities and engagement from these respective participants, to overcome the issues and drawbacks identified by these participants may be afforded through educational/community opportunities.

Finally, intergenerational experiences were noted through data collection in the TILL study and were pivotal in continuing social connections with family and friends (Freeman et al., 2020). For example, findings showed older adults leveraged existing friendships and familial relationships when learning and adjusting to new digital devices and technologies. This is particularly the case when geographic distance is playing an integral role in these respective intergenerational relationships. The notion of a “digital gathering place” is motivated and implemented by all familial relationships and friends to ensure communication is continued.

The Technology 4 Young Adults (Technology 4 Young Adults (T4YA) Project, 2017) was a pilot study to understand the perception, use and impact technology has on young adults aged 18–34 years—the Millennials—in the UK. Findings from the T4YA initial study identified several primary themes including privacy issues and concerns, activities relating to content and sharing of information confidence, usability, and functionality of using technology and associated platforms coupled with various day-to-day activities (Marston, 2019).

The interdisciplinary research project “Internet and Mental Health” (2016–2019) aimed to investigate the psychosocial effects of using online media. In Germany, a nationally representative survey of 1,929 adolescents and younger adults (aged 14–39 years) focused on topics such as social media and gaming disorder (Reer et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020a), the fear of missing out (Reer et al., 2019), or sexual harassment in online contexts (Tang et al., 2020b). A primary goal of this project was to examine how the use of ICTs is associated with different indicators of mental health, loneliness, depression, and anxiety. Findings from this project underline the central role of the Internet in the daily lives of the younger generation and emphasize its relevance for younger user's psychosocial well-being.

The “Being Connected at Home - Making use of digital devices in later life” project (BCONNECT HOME, 2018–2020) investigates fundamental changes in the contemporary experience of later life, at the intersection of digital infrastructures, place and the experience of “being connected” (Fernández-Ardèvol et al., 2019). It addresses a research gap by exploring and theorizing the role of digital communication devices—such as smartphones (that have been tracked), tablets, PCs, apps, fitness trackers, pedometers, or “brain games” —in relation to the modern life course. It combines this theoretical approach with a practical goal through co-design by involving diverse older people and other relevant stakeholders in “Academic Work Places” in the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Canada. The project is contextualized by debates around age in place, loneliness and social isolation, and the idea that these are age-related challenges that require interventions.

The ACCESS Project (Supporting Digital Literacy and Appropriation of ICT by older people, 2018–2021) aims to provide and evaluate socially embedded learning opportunities for older adults who are digitally excluded. The aim of the project is to support older adults to learn and appropriate new digital technologies later in life in Austria, Germany, Italy, Finland and Japan. It addresses a research gap by exploring informal, non-formal and formal learning settings in later life and further developing it through combination of such approaches with different forms of learning (courses, senior-to-senior approaches, praxlabs) (Gallistl et al., 2020).

The project “App-Solute News: Intergenerational Learning, Digitalisation and the Media” (2020–2022) looks at the daily routine of newspaper reading in the context of the transition from analog (printed paper) to digital (e-paper and app). Intergenerational teams of students and adults 60+ in the region of Styria in Austria will compare their reading habits, work with printed papers and e-paper apps, and create digital stories about their experiences. The aim is to investigate the narratives that are formed in these intergenerational encounters with regard to the transition from analog to digital. The project aims at understanding the role of age and age-related stereotypes in digitalisation processes.

Building upon the extensive projects conducted before, this study is expected to bring in a sociological lens to look into the influence of using digital technologies. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as a health crisis has resulted in the disruption of work, family support, education and social interaction. These changes may have formed heath, social and economic stressors to one's psychological well-being in the times of ongoing crisis. The stress-process model illustrates how economic strains and changing social circumstances become long-term stressors that impact individual health and well-being and how various sociodemographic groups may have different degrees of impacts (Pearlin et al., 2005). This framework provides a new perspective to look into the prevalence of how individuals from different sociodemographic backgrounds change to use the digital technologies and also provides explanations on the extent digital technologies influence individual well-being and loneliness to cope with the external pandemic.

While the aforementioned projects address issues related to the use and impact and appropriation of digital technology in people's lives, this paper reports on a study that, although addressing adjacent goals to those of the projects above, emerges in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic scenario. Freeman et al. (2020) continue to note the importance of intergenerational support and communication, is having and has been pivotal since the start of the pandemic. Whereby, the use of various forms of digital technologies (e.g., communication tools and social media platforms) as a primary method of maintaining intergenerational social connectedness and support has been key. For example, for those older adults who do not have internet access, while their children or grandchildren who do have internet, has afforded the older person to be able to receive groceries during the strict lockdown(s) period. During the lockdown period of the pandemic and especially for those citizens in society categorized as vulnerable and who needed to shield, having access to the internet was key to ensuring day-to-day/monthly supplies of groceries as well as maintaining communication and leisure activities. The survey deployed in this study has and will capture the various activities of individual respondents and their communities during the pandemic. We anticipate we will be able to report findings surrounding what type of leisure activities have been conducted, the various community efforts employed (especially aimed at the vulnerable populations), and the health and well-being of respondents relating to social connection and loneliness.

Methods

The project- COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness and Leisure Activities (2020a) has employed two theoretical theories, firstly a life course perspective (Elder, 1985; Green, 2017; Hutchinson, 2018). Taking a life course perspective will afford the Consortium to analyse the collected data to specific personal, and historical life events, forming a “personal biography” (Elder, 1985). This project is not primarily aimed at older adults but adults who are 18 years or older and given this unprecedented pandemic has impacted the lives of all citizens globally. Furthermore, taking a life course perspective will provide a quantifiable understanding of how digital technologies have been used by citizens and their respective experiences pre pandemic as well as during the pandemic.

Secondly, ecology theory will afford the Consortium to examine, explore and discuss the role played by digital technologies during the pandemic, as the medium to improve citizens' social connections, which in turn enables citizens social resources and support to reduce feeling of loneliness. Additionally, the ecology theory will facilitate application associated to 1. the levels of loneliness, 2. the decomposition of the user profile and, 3. to ascertain the types of digital technology used by citizens during the pandemic across four areas: 1. Individual, 2. Relationship (e.g., family, peers, and friends), 3. Community (e.g., groups, networks, workplace, neighborhoods), and 4. Societal (Berkes and Folke, 1998; Foxon et al., 2009; Smith and Stirling, 2010; Anderies, 2014; McPhearson et al., 2016; Ahlborg et al., 2019).

Aims and Objectives

The aim of this paper is to describe the online instrument of the COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness and Leisure Activities (2020a,b). This online survey explores how digital technology was used, accessed, perceived and impacted the lives of citizens across 11 countries (UK, Malta, France, Germany, Austria, Romania, India, Singapore, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey) and 10 languages (English, German, French, Hindi, Mandarin, Portuguese, Romanian, Turkish, Spanish, Catalan). This will provide useful insights on the use of digital technologies and the impact of use on loneliness from the surveys across 11 countries.

The surveys across 11 countries under the project: COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness and Leisure Activities (2020a) have the following overarching objectives:

• explore the behavior and use of technology by citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic

• explore how citizens use technology to connect with COVID-19 support groups

• explore how citizens use technology to share information during the COVID-19 pandemic

• explore the health and well-being of citizens during COVID-19 relating to loneliness and digital health literacy

• explore the perception and notion of a national emergency alert system by citizens

• explore the behavior and narratives of users who are using technology to maintain familial and friendship social connections and build new connections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

As can be seen, these aims are incorporated into the online survey and will provide important data on how people have been using digital technologies and the differentiations of digital technologies during the pandemic. Moreover, the survey also covered health-related questions, which enable researchers to look into the health and well-being of the respondents.

Ethics

Ethical approval for conducting the online survey was initially granted by the lead and respective University, The Open University (HREC/3551/MARSTON) located in the UK.

Subsequent ethical approval has been processed and approved by the National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA–Romania), Open University of Catalonia (Spain), Singapore University of Social Sciences (Singapore), Department of Health Sciences Management, University of Malta–(Malta), the Department of Informatics Engineering (DEI)/Center for Informatics and Systems (CISUC) at the University of Coimbra (Portugal), the Department of Mass Communication and Media Studies at the Central University of Punjab (India), Nursing Science, Age and Care Research Group at the Medical University Graz (Austria), Department of Sociology at the University of Vienna, the Department of Age and Care Research Group at the University of Graz (Austria), the Department of Communication at the University of Münster (Germany), and Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University in Turkey.

All versions of the survey, study information sheet and certification from respective Universities have been shared with The Open University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) to ensure those respective records are maintained and kept up to date.

All documentation lists the ethical approval granted by the lead University and the respective University ethical committee or board. Informed consent was obtained by all participants taking part in this online survey.

Partner Recruitment

Upon completion and deployment of the English version of the survey, the project lead (HRM) contacted colleagues in a bid to expand the survey and increase participant recruitment. This resulted in the lead for Romania (RO) requesting the word documents to be translated and rolled out across Romania.

This, in turn, led to the UK and RO leads utilizing their existing networks and inviting their respective colleagues to join the project. HRM provided a description of the study, responsibilities, and expectations to prospective partners, and once a partner confirmed their involvement, the English survey and study information sheet was provided to the respective partner to allow for back/translation to commence. A copy of the ethics application by HRM at The Open University was shared with the respective partner to facilitate the respective partner to expedite their own ethical approval process.

Participant Recruitment

Given the focus of this work and the restrictions imposed by the respective Universities and Countries, participant recruitment is being conducted through multiple channels in what constitutes a non-probabilistic sampling process, usual in online research (Ayhan, 2011). This includes social media channels (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, WhatsApp), existing mailing lists, stakeholder organizations (e.g., Age Northern Ireland). Subjects aged 18 years and older are allowed to take part in the online survey.

To obtain insights into the current COVID-19 health crisis during the lockdown period, a virtual snowball sampling technique is applied through the project team's networks to build a sample quickly and across different countries. This technique is increasingly applied given the facilities that the Internet opens to investigate phenomena in current societies (Benfield and Szlemko, 2006; Baltar and Brunet, 2012). This approach has advantages such as reaching individuals faster (hence minimizing the period of collecting and processing data), expanding the sample size and the scope of the study across different settings (e.g., different countries) given the flexibility to apply them in different formats and languages. Nevertheless, this approach also has some shortcomings, such as selection bias related to the online population reached and the non-representativeness of the sample to the general population, aspects that should be considered when analyzing the data. Additionally, India chose to recruit participants using an alternative approach to the other countries, and includes using a direct WhatsApp link, followed by frequent follow-ups. The approach was deemed by the respective partner as a means of encouraging prospective participants to participate in this survey. Furthermore, this approach provides a more personalized approach in helping to get good numbers of responses within an Indian context.

Currently, some surveys are still ongoing, and it is not possible to provide a complete overview of participant demographics of this study. However, the 11 study sites involved in the project include an interesting subset of countries, representing different socio-economic groups and population characteristics (Table 1). This will lend the project and the collected data to include and report diversity. Furthermore, this will provide insight concerning countries of high, middle, and low-income, surrounding different demographic characteristics, for example population densities, median age, life expectancy, etc. Overall, the countries involved in this study represent ~22% of the world share of the population.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the countries included in this study (United Nations, (2019); The World Bank Group, (n.d.); Worldometer, (n.d.-a), (n.d.-b)).

Online Survey

The online survey rolled out for the study uses the Qualtrics platform as the sole method of deployment across different networks. The English version of the survey is based on previous iterations and studies conducted by the lead author (Marston, 2012, 2019; Marston et al., 2016, 2019). During the design of the English version of the survey, revisions were conducted to the instrument to meet the aims and objectives of the study.

For a new survey to be added to the Qualtrics platform, a copy is made within the platform and the lead author transfers (manually, copy and paste) the translated version of the survey into the new project. The project is named in that respective language. Once the translation is transferred, the survey is exported into Microsoft Word, saved, and shared with the partner(s) to review for any errors, changes in questions to reflect the cultural context and resent for amendments within the Qualtrics platform. In some instances back to HRM, the survey may have several colleagues from one institution reviewing the documentation and suggesting revisions. Once the respective partners have agreed that the documentation is correct, the respective online measuring instrument goes through some usability testing, on various hardware devices, and changes are suggested. Once this stage has been agreed, the instrument is copied again, and republished, in preparation for rollout.

Survey Languages and Translated Versions

Table 2 presents the versions of the survey, translated languages and the lead for each country. At present there are 10 countries which currently have the survey deployed and staggered rollout dates because of ethical approval. Survey versions by additional partners will be open for 3 months respectively upon ethical approval and rollout.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Displays the survey iterations.

Measures

The surveys build on previous iterations from the Technology 4 Younger Adults (T4YA) study (Marston, 2019), the iStoppFalls EU project (Marston et al., 2016), the Technology In Later Life (TILL) project (Genoe et al., 2018; Marston et al., 2019; Freeman et al., 2020), and the doctoral work of HRM (Marston, 2012).

In total there have been seven scholarly works published using earlier iterations of this survey (Marston, 2012, 2019; Marston et al., 2016, 2019; Genoe et al., 2018; Freeman et al., 2020). An earlier iteration of a survey deployed in the TILL study is available for download (Marston et al., 2019). The previous version of the survey deployed in the TILL study comprised an 80-item survey.

This new iteration of the English version of the survey comprises 65-items (Table 3). For some of the languages/countries there have been some minor alterations to the survey to represent each country's respective culture, laws, and educational systems. For example, the Singapore arm requested the questions relating to sexuality should be deleted for both the English and Mandarin versions which would be rolled out across the respective networks. The consideration is due to the fact that Singapore still retains the section 377A of the Penal Code (Singapore Statues Online, 2020). Though the law is not enforced (Chen, 2013), the partner for the Singapore arm decided to revise the question about the sexuality to a conventional question of the participants' gender with an option where participants can fill out the identity freely. The French partner also requested the questions on sexual orientation and transgender identity to be removed due to its too intimate nature.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Presents an overview of the measuring variables included in the COVID-19 technology, self-isolation, health, well-being, and leisure activities study.

Furthermore, a slight change in wording for questions relating to the national emergency alert system were renamed to “Public Warning System” in Singapore. Both versions in India (English and Hindi) as well as the version in European Portuguese, French and German do not include the question relating to ethnicity. In some instances, the types of educational qualification were altered to represent the respective cultural contexts. This occurred for translations in Catalan and Spanish, European Portuguese, and German. The Spanish version was also aimed at rolling out in extended networks across Hispanic America. Additionally, in both the Catalan and Spanish versions the questions relating to a national emergency alert system were deleted, and this was on the guidance of the partners in the project, because they felt that in their targeted countries there were either no such systems in place, or no public discussion on the matter, making the question difficult to answer in most instances.

Procedure

The project lead for the UK shares a copy of the study information sheet and a copy of the English survey with the new consortium partner. If a partner has additional colleagues, communication is limited to reduce the risk of information being misunderstood and to ensure all communication between the two coordinators is correct. This is a practical approach during the survey translation(s) and testing phases.

Each new country/partner applies for ethical approval through their respective University ethics committee. Additional documentation from the UK partner is shared based on the favorable opinion granted by the Open University (HREC/3551/MARSTON). A copy of the ethics application is also shared to assist the respective partner in completing their ethics application. Furthermore, each partner has the option to attach this document and the favorable opinion to their respective application.

The Qualtrics platform is used to create and deploy the survey to adhere to the Open University policies. All translated surveys from each study partner are transferred into a new project within the platform and exported to Microsoft Word for checking by the Consortium partner. Each revision within the platform is published and allows the consortium partner to test their respective survey for user experience (UX)/usability issues and formatting. At each revision, the consortium partner receives an updated version of the survey via a Word document and is able to review the survey online.

Survey Deployment

Once ethical approval is granted, the survey was “published” via the Qualtrics platform, which created an independent link that is shared via various channels (specific email(s), anonymous link etc.). The COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness and Leisure Activities (2020b) project website is the portal for all participants to review the study, download the respective study information sheet, and access the online survey.

To assist prospective participants to identify the correct survey to complete, a series of flags are placed at the side of each translated section (Figures 1–4). To ensure access to the study information sheet and the respective online survey—there are links in the respective language which highlights the links— “Study Information Sheet” and “Complete Online Survey Here”. The size of the flags helps identify the desired version of the survey. However, an issue that might prevent participants to reach their survey is that the webpage is only available in English.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Figure displays three partners involved in the study and their respective flags, study information, contact information. For each partner/country, there were additional links to the online survey, study information sheet, and consent form.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Figure displays three partners involved in the study and their respective flags, study information, contact information. For each partner/country, there were additional links to the online survey, study information sheet, and consent form.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Figure displays three partners involved in the study and their respective flags, study information, contact information. For each partner/country, there were additional links to the online survey, study information sheet, and consent form.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Figure displays three partners involved in the study and their respective flags, study information, contact information. For each partner/country, there were additional links to the online survey, study information sheet, and consent form.

For each country/consortium partner, there is a contact email address available on the study website and the study information sheet. This facilitates the participant(s) to contact the researcher in charge of the survey in each particular language (Figures 1–4).

Data Analysis

In this section of the study protocol, we outline how the collected data and subsequent analysis will drive the results forward. Each survey translation closes at various times and at present between 4th July and 29th September 2020. The data analysis will take the form of descriptive statistics with crosstabulations and multivariate regression models to provide preliminary descriptive findings. This in turn will drive the results to afford the Consortium members to explore and understand the collected data from the standpoint of (a) age, (b) gender, (c) education, and (d) country. T-tests will be employed to test the differences in the levels of well-being and loneliness feelings among different social groups based on sociodemographic characteristics. Lastly, inferential statistical analysis will be conducted to examine the relationships between digital use and well-being and/or loneliness feelings, with the considerations of different sociodemographic, family structure, and country settings (especially related to COVID-19 measures) of respondents.

Our sample is a convenience sample in all countries included in the study and we do not claim to have statistical and national representative at the country level. Still, we will conduct further analysis if the structure of our sample in each country is comparable with the structure of the adult population with Internet access (age, gender, education level and economic status).

To consider the differences across the countries and cultures included in the study, this project relies on a research team that consists of native speakers and local researchers, who are and will play an important role in contextualizing the respective data. Additionally, members of the research team have the role in comparing the data across the main socio-demographics (age, gender, level of education, economic status) and to provide valuable information regarding the comparability of the sample in the current proposal with the structure of the total adult population in the respective countries.

We anticipate the collected data will provide an insight into the prevalence of different types of digital technologies with the crosstabulations of various sociodemographic characteristics. While each study site will be conducting their own data analysis, we will also be merging the different data sets into STATA to facilitate greater statistical analysis via multivariate analyses to understand the impact(s) of digital technologies on well-being and loneliness. All surveys will be closed by the end of September.

Online Repository

As part of the ethical process at The Open University an online repository is used—Open Research Data Online (ORDO). A separate project has been created by the lead, and all partners have been invited to join the project. ORDO will be used to store all final documents, data and associated information relating to this study. Each country/region has its individual folder to facilitate ease of organization, access and following the policies of The Open University.

The Consortium

This is a cooperative project that responds to the need of urgent information during the unexpected COVID-19 pandemic. The project lead has already defined the operational dynamics of the study to grant fast and sustainable outputs (academic journals, policy recommendations) as well as other dynamics in search of the establishment of a consortium able to create an intellectual community around the gathered data. Each study site has worked with the project lead to ensure the translated survey has conducted backwards translation of the online survey and to ensure the meaning(s) of the survey questions are not lost. Each site lead was responsible for their own participant recruitment—via mailing lists, various social media channels (e.g., Twitter and Facebook) and will be responsible for data analysis.

Discussion and Future Work

In this study protocol we are describing how this international, multi-centered project has been designed to explore and understand how digital technology and associated platforms are being used by citizens and how digital technology impacts on their day-to-day lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, across different countries, regions and cultures. With this in mind, participants of the study are welcome to complete a survey if they are over 18 years old. Given the unprecedented crisis on a global scale, citizens in society are living and experiencing life differently to what society was prior to the pandemic and also differently depending on the country they live in. Therefore, it is important to explore how technology is having an impact on citizens from the age of 18+ years, rather than just focusing on older adults as this will allow for comparisons between generations.

In particular, it is essential to capture the possibilities that digital technology affords citizens during this pandemic a as way of garnering insights with the view to working toward respective pathways to impact, which in turn has the ability to inform policy and decision makers at local, regional, national and international levels. The fact that this survey is being deployed across several different languages, affords the Consortium members to reach out and understand different cultures and demographics. Furthermore, this project lends itself to understanding the necessary multidimensional perspective required to develop effective and meaningful pathways associated to social science and behavioral research, public engagement, knowledge translation and pathways to impact in the future. Moreover, this international project affords the Consortium partners to understand how digital technology is used and impacts society at a time when social distancing measures were varied and may afford the research team to understand and explore possible suggestions and solutions to feed into policy.

This study protocol describes the COVID-19: Technology, Social Connection, Loneliness and Leisure Activities project and we anticipate the findings driven from the collected data will contribute to the fields of gerontechnology, Human Computer Interaction (HCI), gerontology, and social sciences by the creation of a Master dataset and individual datasets from each site. Furthermore, this research will contribute to the existing scholarly research (Morris et al., 2014; Baker et al., 2018; Barbosa Neves et al., 2019; Ammar et al., 2020a,b,c; Fakoya et al., 2020; Marston and Morgan, 2020; Marston et al., 2020; Seifert et al., 2020). The Consortium anticipates the findings from the collected data will indicate how digital technology and associated platforms impact the lives of citizens across various sites during the pandemic. This will afford researchers, stakeholders and policy makers the opportunity in the future to learn and understand how citizens in the respective countries utilized digital technologies during unprecedented times. Additionally, the Consortium will be undertaking a wide variety of public engagement and knowledge translation activities, in addition to ensuring traditional academic outputs are achieved. Members of the Consortium will seek out opportunities to share findings with respective countries at local, regional and national levels of policy in a bid to offer insights and solutions in the future.

Currently, existing scholarly research demonstrates the growing interest in contemporary academe surrounding the use of digital technology as a bridge to maintain social connections and interactions while reducing loneliness; with the aim of understanding how technology has impacted the lives of many citizens worldwide. This study protocol describes how this particular study, to the knowledge of the Consortium, is the first to take an international, interdisciplinary rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic, while contributing to existing respective disciplines.

The social impacts of the pandemic can be understood through the lens of the digital divide with the intersectionality of education, gender and age. The project is expected to bring in first-hand data to understand the prevalence of technology associated to the different socio-demographic groups. This in turn will afford us to understand whether the COVID-19 pandemic narrows the digital gap or widens it. Incorporated with the loneliness scale and the questions of the activities, researchers can examine the extent to which digital technology use influences individuals' mental well-being and social connections, and the heterogeneity among social groups.

Future work surrounding the Consortium members and the collected data will explore funding opportunities to enable the next phase of this project—pathways to impact and dissemination activities. The former may include an Open Educational Resource (OER) developed and accessible via The Open University which will include input from all project partners and will include content related to the findings. This in turn will enable citizens, policy makers, stakeholders, and researchers on a global scale to access, learn, and understand how digital technologies played a role and impacted the lives of citizens across 11 countries. Dissemination activities will include traditional academic outputs (e.g., journal papers and conference presentations), seminars, booklets/reports and where appropriate contributing to policy.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Open University (UK) HREC/3551/MARSTON. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin. All study sites received ethical approval prior to survey deployment. The French version of the online survey was approved via the Open University.

Author Contributions

HM: conceptualization. HM, LI, MF-A, AR, MG-L, DB-T, SE, P-CK, SC, BB, HÖ, HA, RK, UK, FG, FR, TQ, SB, PS, VG, RR, and the COVID19 Technology Consortium Group: writing – original draft preparation, review, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to all author/site led for conducting survey translation(s) in preparation for survey deployment. We would also like to thank all participants who completed the online survey via the various social media channels, mailing lists, and snowball approaches.

References

Ahlborg, H., Ruiz-Mercado, I., Molander, S., and Masera, O. (2019). Bringing technology into social-ecological systems research—motivations for a socio-technical-ecological systems approach. Sustainability 11. doi: 10.3390/su11072009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ammar, A., Brach, M., Trabelsi, K., Chtourou, H., Boukhris, O., Masmoudi, L., et al. (2020b). Effects of COVID-19 home confinement on eating behaviour and physical activity: results of the ECLB-COVID19 international online survey. Nutrients 12:1583. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.04.20072447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ammar, A., Chtourou, H., Boukhris, O., Trabelsi, K., Masmoudi, L., Brach, M., et al. (2020a). COVID-19 home confinement negatively impacts social participation and life satisfaction: a worldwide multicenter study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:6237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ammar, A., Trabelsi, K., Brach, M., Chtourou, H., Boukhris, O., and Masmoudi, L., et al. (2020c). Effects of home confinement on mental health and lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak: insight from the ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study. Biol. Sport 38, 9–21. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.04.20091017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderies, J. M. (2014). Embedding built environments in social–ecological systems: resilience-based design principles. Build. Res. Inform. 42, 130–142. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ayhan, H. Ö. (2011). “Non-probability sampling survey methods,” in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, ed M. Lovric (Berlin: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_41

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker, S., Warburton, J., Waycott, J., Batchelor, F., Hoang, F., Dow, B., et al. (2018). Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: a systematic review of existing evidence. Australas. J. Ageing 37, 184–193. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12572

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ball, F. J., Kadylak, C. T., and Cotten, S. R. (2019). “Aging in the digital age: conceptualizing technology adoption and digital inequalities,” in Ageing and Digital Technology, eds B. B. Neves, and F. Vetere (Singapore: Springer), 35–49. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baltar, F., and Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Int. Res. 22, 57–74 doi: 10.1108/10662241211199960

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barbosa Neves, B., Franz, R., Judges, R., Beermann, C., and Baecker, R. (2019). Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? a feasibility study. J. Appl. Gerontol. 38, 49–72. doi: 10.1177/0733464817741369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beer, J. M., Smarr, C. A., Chen, T. L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., et al. (2012). “The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place,” in Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery), 335–342. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157806

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benfield, J. A., and Szlemko, W. J. (2006). Internet-based data collection: promises and realities. J. Res. Prac. 2:2006. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/30/51 (accessed October 28, 2020).

Bentlage, E., Ammar, A., How, D., Ahmed, M., Trabelsi, K., Chtourou, H., et al. (2020). Practical recommendations for maintaining active lifestyle during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:6265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1998). “Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and Sustainability,” in Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds F. Berkes, and C. Folke (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–26.

Google Scholar

Bouma, H., Czaja, S. J., Umemuro, H., Rogers, W. A., Schulz, R., and Hastuti-Kurniawan, S. (2004). “Technology: a means for enhancing the independence and connectivity of older people,” in Proceedings on the Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna: Association for Computing Machinery), 1580–1581. doi: 10.1145/985921.986154

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J. (2013). Singapore's culture war over section 377A: through the lens of public choice and Multilingual research. Law Soc. Inquiry 38, 106–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01297.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chtourou, H., Trabelsi, K., H'mida, C., Boukhris, O., Glenn, J. M., Brach, M., et al. (2020). Staying physically active during the quarantine and self-isolation period for controlling and mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic overview of the literature. Front. Psychol. 11:1708. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W., and Tufekci, Z. (2009). Old wine in a new technology or a different type of digital divide? New Media Soc. 11, 1163–1186. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., and McCullough, B. M. (2013). Impact of Internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 15:e39. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cotten, S. R., Shank, D., and Anderson, W. (2014). Gender, technology use and ownership, and media-based multitasking among middle school students. Comput. Human Behav. 35, 99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness and Leisure Activities (2020a). Available online at: https://healthwellbeing.kmi.open.ac.uk/covid-19/technology-social-connections-loneliness-leisure-activities/ (accessed October 1, 2020).

COVID-19: Technology, Social Connections, Loneliness and Leisure Activities (2020b). Online Surveys. Available online at: https://healthwellbeing.kmi.open.ac.uk/covid-19/ (accessed October 1, 2020).

Google Scholar

Czaja, S., Beach, S., Charness, N., and Schulz, R. (2013). “Older adults and the adoption of healthcare technology: opportunities and challenges,” in Technologies for Active Aging. International Perspectives on Aging, eds A. Sixsmith, and G. Gutman (Boston, MA: Springer), 27–46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Czaja, S. J., and Barr, R. A. (1989). Technology and the everyday life of older adults. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 503, 127–137. doi: 10.1177/0002716289503001010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., and Sharit, J. (2018). Improving social support for older adults through technology: findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist 58, 467–477. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Education in the United States (2020). Wikipedia. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_United_States (accessed March 28, 2020).

Elder, G. H. (1985). “Perspectives on the fife course,” in Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions, ed Glen H. Elder, Jr. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 23–49.

Fakoya, O. A., McCorry, N. K., and Donnelly, M. (2020). Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health 20:129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2019). “One phone, two phones, four phones: older women and mobile telephony in Lima, Peru,” in Gendered Power and Mobile Technology: Intersections in the Global South, eds C. W. Larsson, and L. Stark, (London: Routledge) 93–107. doi: 10.4324/9781315175904-5

CrossRef Full Text

Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2020). “Older people go mobile,” in The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Communication and Society, eds R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S.S. Lim, and Y. Li, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 186–199. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190864385.013.13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Ardèvol, M., and Ivan, L. (2015). “Why age is not that important? an ageing perspective on computer anxiety,” in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging. ITAP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9193, eds J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Cham: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales, A., Loos, E., Peine, A., Beneito-Montagut, R., Blanche, D., et al. (2019). “Methodological strategies to understand smartphone practices for social connectedness in later life,” in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Social Media, Games and Assistive Environments. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11593, eds J. Zhou, and G. Salvendy (Cham: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-22015-0_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Sawchuk, K., and Grenier, L. (2017). Maintaining connections: octo- and nonagenarians on digital ‘use and non-use’. Nordicom Rev. 38, 39–51. doi: 10.1515/nor-2017-0396

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Foxon, T. J., Reed, M. S., and Stringer, L. C. (2009). Governing long-term social–ecological change: what can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other? Environ. Pol. Govern. 19, 3–20. doi: 10.1002/eet.496

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Freeman, S., Marston, H. R., Olynick, J., Musselwhite, C., Kulczycki, C., Genoe, R., et al. (2020). Intergenerational effects on the impacts of technology use in later life: insights from an international, multi-site study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17:5711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media Soc. 18, 313–331. doi: 10.1177/1461444814538648

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallistl, V., and Nimrod, G. (2020). Media-based leisure and wellbeing: a study of older Internet users. Leis. Stud. 39, 251–265. doi: 10.1080/02614367.2019.1694568

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Seifert, A., and Wanka, A. (2020). Configuring the older non-user: between research, policy and practice of digital exclusion. Soc. Incl. 8, 233–243. doi: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2607

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Genoe, M. R., Kulczycki, C., Marston, H., Freeman, S., Musselwhite, C., and Rutherford, H. (2018). E-leisure and older adults: findings from an international exploratory study. Ther. Recreation J. 52, 1–18. doi: 10.18666/TRJ-2018-V52-I1-8417

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilleard, C., Jones, I., and Higgs, P. (2015). Connectivity in later life: the declining age divide in mobile cell phone ownership. Soc. Res. Online 20:3. doi: 10.5153/sro.3552

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, L. (2017). Understanding the Fife Course: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, 2nd Edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hargittai, E., and Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Can. J. Commun. 42, 1–18 doi: 10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Henwood, F., and Marent, B. (2019). Understanding digital health: productive tensions at the intersection of sociology of health and science and technology studies. Soc. Health Ill. 41, 1–15. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12898

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hofstra, B., Corten, R., van Tubergen, F., and Ellison, N. B. (2017). Sources of segregation in social networks: a novel approach using Facebook. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82, 625–656. doi: 10.1177/0003122417705656

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hutchinson, E. D. (2018). Dimensions of Human Behavior: The Changing Life Course. London: Sage.

Google Scholar

Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., et al. (2010). Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/8402.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ivan, L., and Hebblethwaite, S. (2016). Grannies on the net: grandmothers' experiences of Facebook in family communication. Roman. J. Commun. Public Relat. 18, 11–25. doi: 10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.199

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ivan, L., Loos, E. F., and Bird, I. (Accepted). The impact of technology generations on older adults' media use: review of previous empirical research and a seven country comparison. Gerontechnology.

Lagacé, M., Charmarkeh, H., Laplante, J., and Tanguay, A. (2015). How ageism contributes to the second level digital divide: the case of Canadian seniors. J. Technol. Human Usabil. 11, 1–13. doi: 10.18848/2381-9227/CGP/v11i04/56439

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loos, E., Nimrod, G., and Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (Coords.). (2018). Older Audiences in the Digital Media Environment: A Cross-National Longitudinal Study. Wave 1 Report 1.0. Montreal, Canada: ACT project. Available online at: spectrum.library.concordia.ca/983866 (accessed April 26, 2020)

Google Scholar

Loos, E., Nimrod, G., and Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (Coords.). (2019). Older Audiences in the Digital Media Environment: A Cross-National Longitudinal Study. Wave2. Report v1.0. Montreal, Canada: ACT project. Available online at: spectrum.library.concordia.ca/986444/ (accessed April 26, 2020)

Google Scholar

Marston, H. R. (2012). Older adults as 21st century game designers. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 1, 90–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03392330

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marston, H. R. (2019). Millennials and ICT. Findings from the Technology 4 Young Adults (T4YA) project: an exploratory study. Societies 9:80. doi: 10.3390/soc9040080

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marston, H. R., Genoe, R., Freeman, S., Kulczycki, C., and Musselwhite, C. (2019). Older adult's perceptions of ICT: main findings from the Technology in Later Life (TILL) study. Healthcare 7:86. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7030086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marston, H. R., Kroll, M., Fink, D., de Rosario, H., and Gschwind, Y. J. (2016). Technology use, adoption and behaviour in older adults: results from the iStoppFalls Project. Educ. Gerontol. 42, 371–387. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2015.1125178

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marston, H. R., and Morgan, D. J. (2020). Technology and social media during COVID-19 pandemic. Special issue: COVID-19 and geriatric mental health Worldwide. IPA Bull. 3. Available online at: https://www.ipa-online.org/publications/ipa-bulletin/featured-articles/covid-19-bulletin-articles/technology-social-media-during-covid19 (accessed October 28, 2020).

Marston, H. R., Musselwhite, C., and Hadley, R. A. (2020). COVID-19 vs Social Isolation: The Impact Technology can Have on Communities, Social Connections and Citizens. Ageing Issues, 18th March 2020. The British Society of Gerontology. Available online at: https://ageingissues.wordpress.com/2020/03/18/covid-19-vs-social-isolation-the-impact-technology-can-have-on-communities-social-connections-and-citizens/?fbclid=IwAR1sUsffKNd_G5u6d_oc0Z56u4Es7HyoCJYKr0qSnqFxX68pD3PY5JaSl7g (accessed October 28, 2020).

Google Scholar

Marston, H. R., and van Hoof, J. (2019).“Who doesn't think about technology when designing urban environments for older people? ” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO'S age-friendly cities model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:3525 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

McPhearson, T., Pickett, S. T. A., Grimm, N. B., Niemelä, J., Alberti, M., Elmqvist, T., et al. (2016). Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. Bioscience 66, 198–212. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitzner, T., O'Brien, M., and Rogers, W. (2012). “Emerging technologies for healthcare and aging,” in Proceedings on the Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, TX: Association for Computing Machinery), 2699–2702. doi: 10.1145/2212776.2212699

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., et al. (2010). Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput. Human Behav. 26, 1710–1721. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morris, M. E., Adair, B., Ozanne, E., Kurowski, W., Miller, K. J., Pearce, A. J., et al. (2014). Smart technologies to enhance social connectedness in older people who live at home. Australas. J. Ageing 33, 142–152. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mynatt, E. D., Essa, I., and Rogers, W. (2000). “Increasing the opportunities for aging in place,” in Proceedings on the Conference on Universal Usability (Arlington, VA: Association for Computing Machinery), 65–71. doi: 10.1145/355460.355475

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mynatt, E. D., Melenhorst, A. S., Fisk, A. D., and Rogers, W. A. (2004). Aware technologies for aging in place: understanding user needs and attitudes. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 3, 36–41. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2004.1316816

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nimrod, G. (2019). Selective motion: media displacement among older Internet users. Inform. Commun. Soc. 22, 1269–1280. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1414865

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nimrod, G., and Ivan, L. (2019). The dual roles technology plays in leisure: insights from a study of grandmothers. Leis. Sci. 8, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2019.1656123

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Norman, C. D., and Skinner, H. A. (2006). ‘eHEALS : the eHealth literacy scale corresponding author. J. Med. Int. Res. 8, 1–7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

O'brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., and Fisk, A. D. (2012). Understanding age and technology experience differences in use of prior knowledge for everyday technology interactions. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 4, 1–27. doi: 10.1145/2141943.2141947

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patten (2015). Chapter 1: Estimates of Multiracial Adults and Other Racial and Ethnic Groups Across Various Question Formats. Pew Research Center, Social & Demographic Trends. Retrieved from: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/11/06/chapter-1-estimates-of-multiracial-adults-and-other-racial-and-ethnic-groups-across-various-question-formats/ (accessed March 28, 2020).

Pearlin, L. I., Schieman, S., Fazio, E. M., and Meersman, S. C. (2005). Stress, health, and the life course: some conceptual perspectives. J. Health Soc. Behav. 46, 205–219. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rafalow, M. H. (2018). Disciplining play: digital youth culture as capital at school. Am. J. Sociol. 123, 1416–1452. doi: 10.1086/695766

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reer, F., Festl, R., and Quandt, T. (2020). Investigating problematic social media and game use in a nationally representative sample of adolescents and younger adults. Behav. Inform. Technol. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1724333

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reer, F., Tang, W. Y., and Quandt, T. (2019). Psychosocial well-being and social media engagement: the mediating roles of social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. New Media Soc. 21, 1486–1505. doi: 10.1177/1461444818823719

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosales, A., and Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2016a). Beyond WhatsApp: older people and smartphones. Roman. J. Commun. Public Relat. 18, 27–47. doi: 10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosales, A., and Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2016b). “Smartphones, apps and older people's interests: from a generational perspective,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI (Florence), 491–503. doi: 10.1145/2935334.2935363

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., and Ferran-Ferrer, N. (2018). “Long-term appropriation of smartwatches among a group of older people,” in Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Acceptance, Communication and Participation. ITAP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10926, eds J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Cham: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M. J., and Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: the rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:523. doi: 10.1177/0003122412448050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale, (version 3): reliability, validity and factor structure. J. Pers. Assess. 66, 20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryff, C. D., and Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 719–727. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryff, C. D., and Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Int. J. Adv. Psychol. Theory 9, 1–28. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlomann, A., Seifert, A., Zank, S., Woopen, C., and Rietz, C. (2020). Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) devices among the oldest-old: loneliness, anomie, and autonomy. Innov. Aging 4:igz050. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seifert, A., Cotten, S. R., and Xie, B. (2020). A double burden of exclusion? digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. J. Gerontol. B gbaa098. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Settlement Hierarchy (2019). Wikipedia. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlement_hierarchy (accessed March 28, 2020).

Shah, S. G. S., Nogueras, D., Woerden, H. van, and Kiparoglou, V. (2019). Effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness in adults: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 9:e032455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharit, J., Moxley, J. H., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., and Czaja, S. J. (2019). Effects of extended use of an age-friendly computer system on assessments of computer proficiency, attitudes, and usability by older non-computer users. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12, 1–28. doi: 10.1145/3325290

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singapore Statues Online (2020). Outrages on Decency 377A. Available online at: sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PC1871?ProvIds=pr377A (accessed June 7, 2020).

Sixsmith, A., and Sixsmith, J. (2000). Smart care technologies: meeting whose needs? J. Telemed. Telecare 6, 190–192. doi: 10.1258/1357633001934636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, A., and Stirling, A. (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecol. Soc. 15:11. Available online at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art11/ (accessed October 28, 2020). doi: 10.5751/ES-03218-150111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, W. Y., Reer, F., and Quandt, T. (2020a). The interplay of gaming disorder, gaming motivations, and the dark triad. J. Behav. Addict. 9, 491–496. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, W. Y., Reer, F., and Quandt, T. (2020b). Investigating sexual harassment in online video games: how personality and context factors are related to toxic sexual behaviours against fellow players. Aggress. Behav. 46, 127–135. doi: 10.1002/ab.21873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Technology 4 Young Adults (T4YA) Project (2017). Project Website. Available online at: https://healthwellbeing.kmi.open.ac.uk/related-projects/t4ya-project/ (accessed October 1, 2020).

Technology In Later Life (TILL) project (2015–2017). Available online at: https://healthwellbeing.kmi.open.ac.uk/related-projects/technology-in-later-life-till-project/ (accessed October 1, 2020).

The World Bank Group (n.d.). World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk. Available online at: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups (accessed August 31, 2020).

Thrive (2019). How to Ask about Gender and Sexuality in Surveys. Retrieved from: https://wewillthrive.co.uk/resources/blogs/how-to-ask-about-gender-or-sexuality-in-surveys

UK Government (n.d.). List of Ethnic Groups. Retrieved from: https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/ethnic-groups (accessed March 28, 2020

United Nations (2019). World Population Prospects—Population Division—United Nations. Available online at: https://population.un.org/wpp/DataQuery/ (accessed August 31, 2020).

Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., and Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11, 274–302. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, P. J., Marston, H. R., Shore, L., and Turner, R. (2020). Learning from COVID-19: design, age-friendly technology, hacking and mental models [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. Emerald Open Res. 2:21. doi: 10.35241/emeraldopenres.13599.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), Situation Report – 209. 16th August. Available online at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200816-covid-19-sitrep-209.pdf?sfvrsn=5dde1ca2_2 (accessed September 2, 2020).

Google Scholar

Worldometer (n.d.-a). Life Expectancy by Country and in the World (2020)—Worldometer. Available online at: https://www.worldometers.info/demographics/life-expectancy/#countries-ranked-by-life-expectancy (accessed August 31, 2020).

Worldometer (n.d.-b). Population by Country (2020)—Worldometer. Available online at: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/ (accessed August 31 2020).