Previous Extrapulmonary Malignancies Impact Outcomes in Patients With Surgically Resected Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background: As the overall survival of patients with cancer continues to improve, the incidence of second primary malignancies seems to be increasing. Previous studies have shown controversial results regarding the survival of patients with primary lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. This study aimed to determine the clinical picture and outcomes of this particular subgroup of patients.

Materials and Methods: We included 2,408 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer at our institute between January 1, 2011 and December 30, 2017 in this retrospective study. Medical records were extracted and clinicopathological parameters and postoperative prognoses were compared between patients with lung cancer with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies.

Results: There were 200 (8.3%) patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Breast cancer (30.5%), gastrointestinal cancer (17%), and thyroid cancer (9%) were the most common previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Age, sex, a family history of lung cancer, and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels were significantly different between the two groups. Patients with previous breast or thyroid cancer had significantly better overall survival than those without previous malignancies. Conversely, patients with other previous extrapulmonary malignancies had significantly poorer overall survival (p < 0.001). The interval between the two cancer diagnoses did not significantly correlate with clinical outcome.

Conclusion: Although overall survival was lower in patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies, previous breast or thyroid cancer did not increase mortality. Our findings may help surgeons to predict prognosis in this subgroup of patients with primary lung cancer.

Introduction

In recent decades, major improvements in cancer treatment, including molecular targeted and immune modulation therapies, have allowed patients to survive long enough to develop subsequent primary malignancies (1). Moreover, advancements in diagnostic approaches, including new imaging techniques and cancer biomarkers, have resulted in earlier and higher detection rates of multiple primary cancers (2, 3). Defined as cancers with more than one independent primary malignancy in the same or different organs, multiple primary cancers may develop in a synchronous or metachronous fashion (4). Although this phenomenon was first described by Billroth (5) in 1889, Cahan et al. (6) in 1969 were the first to report multiple primary cancers involving the lungs. Later, Hofmann et al. (7) demonstrated the incidence of second primary lung cancer at 1.6 per 100,000 population. More recently, Hu et al. (8) identified 178 (5.0%) patients with primary lung cancer undergoing surgery who had different types of previous extrapulmonary malignancies.

While there is no doubt that multiple primary malignancies involving the lungs can occur, the therapeutic strategies and survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer with a history of extrapulmonary malignancies remain controversial. An increased risk of synchronous lung cancer in patients with breast cancer has been reported, suggesting that genetic factors may increase the risk of multiple primary malignancies (9). Additionally, the widespread use of radiotherapy and common risk factors may contribute to an increased risk of second primary lung cancer in patients with a history of head and neck cancer (10–12).

In this study, we aimed to analyze the survival differences among patients with lung cancer with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Additionally, we sought to identify potential risk factors for second primary lung cancer occurrence to develop strategies aimed at prevention and early diagnosis among high-risk individuals.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

In this retrospective study, we obtained data from 2,737 patients with newly diagnosed primary lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection performed by a single surgical team at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2017. A history of previous extrapulmonary malignancies was histologically confirmed from patients' medical records. Controversial cases with possible lung metastases were excluded to avoid any misinterpretation. Cases of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and metachronous second lung cancers were also excluded. Furthermore, patients were excluded if they were not indicated for curative resection or if there was missing data on tumor size, lymph node metastasis, volume of blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and chest tube placement. The final cohort comprised 2,408 patients. Of these, 2,208 patients presented with no previous extrapulmonary malignancies, and 200 presented with previous extrapulmonary malignancies prior to developing primary lung cancer. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (approval number: 20200411RIND). Written informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of this study.

Basic characteristics, including age, sex, smoking status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, a family history of lung cancer, underlying comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart disease, and end-stage renal disease), and preoperative findings (serum carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] level and pulmonary function test) were retrieved from electronic medical records. An abnormal CEA level was defined as ≥5 ng/mL. The surgical method was classified as sublobar resection (wedge resection and segmentectomy) or extensive resection (lobectomy, bilobectomy, and pneumonectomy). The surgical method was determined at the surgeons' discretion and was approved during a weekly multidisciplinary lung cancer meeting.

Patients were monitored in the outpatient clinic using physical examinations, serum CEA measurements, and chest computed tomography (CT) every 6 months for the first 2 years. Thereafter, patients were monitored using similar methods every 6–12 months, according to the physicians' instructions. Brain magnetic resonance imaging/CT, positron emission tomography/bone scan, bronchoscopy, lymph node biopsy, chest ultrasonography, and other tests were performed whenever any symptoms or signs of tumor recurrence were observed.

Clinicopathological Features

Information on the tumor size, predominant histological type, degree of differentiation, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), pathological T and N stage, number of dissected lymph nodes, number of dissected lymph node stations, and resection margins were collected from pathological reports of preoperative biopsies, intraoperative frozen sections, or postoperative specimens. Malignancies were classified as second primaries when the histological features were distinct or confirmed to be different after immunohistochemical staining. Histopathological patterns were classified according to the 2015 World Health Organization criteria (13). Lung cancer, breast cancer, and thyroid cancer staging were determined based on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system (14–16).

Subgroup Analysis of Patients With Primary Lung Cancer With Previous Extrapulmonary Malignancies

The time interval between the diagnosis of the two cancers was defined as the time in years between the diagnosis of a previous extrapulmonary malignancy and that of primary lung cancer. When multiple extrapulmonary malignancies were present in one patient, the shortest time interval was adopted.

Extrapulmonary malignancies were divided into seven subgroups: breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, thyroid cancer, gynecological cancer, head and neck cancer, genitourinary cancer, and others. Gastrointestinal cancers included colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, gallbladder, and liver cancers; gynecological cancers included endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers; genitourinary cancers included renal, urothelial, bladder, and prostate cancers; and others included hematological, central nervous system, soft tissue, and salivary gland cancers. Patients were defined as having multiple previous extrapulmonary malignancies if they had cancer in more than one of these subgroups.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics are reported as mean ± standard deviation for continuous data and as numbers (percentages) for categorical data. Student's t test was conducted for continuous variables, and the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was conducted for categorical variables, depending on the cell size. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to plot survival curves. Statistical comparisons between survival distributions were made using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model was performed to identify factors associated with 5-year overall survival (OS). All p values were two-sided, and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical software used for all analyses was SPSS for MAC (version 25.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Patient Demographics and Clinicopathological Features

The study cohort included 2,408 patients with primary lung cancer, of whom 200 (8.3%) had previous extrapulmonary malignancies, and 59 (2.4%) received neoadjuvant therapy. The mean follow-up time was 39.1 ± 23.4 months. Only age, sex, a family history of lung cancer, and preoperative CEA levels were different between the two groups. Patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies were older (62.0 ± 11.3 vs. 60.3 ± 11.2 years; p = 0.045), predominantly female (71.0 vs. 63.3%; p = 0.030), less likely to have a family history of lung cancer (12.5 vs. 19.7%; p = 0.013), and more likely to have higher preoperative CEA levels (≥ 5 ng/mL: 17.0 vs. 11.0%; p = 0.020) than those with lung cancer only. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1.

No significant differences were observed in the pathological features of lung cancer between patients with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. The most common histological type in both groups was adenocarcinoma (lung cancer only: 91.5%; lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies: 88.5%). Among patients with lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies, 162 (81.0%) had tumors ≤ 3 cm (T1). Detailed information on the pathological features is listed in Table 2.

Perioperative Outcomes

No significant differences in perioperative outcomes were observed between patients with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Sublobar resection was slightly more common than extensive resection in both groups. This may be because most lung cancers were early-stage cancers. Of the 2,408 patients, only two (0.1%) died during the first 30 postoperative days. Other perioperative outcomes are presented in Table 3.

Correlation Between Clinicopathological Features and Survival

In the univariate analysis, many factors were significantly associated with poor OS, including older age, male sex, poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 1), smoking status, higher preoperative CEA levels (≥ 5 ng/mL), extensive resection, thoracotomy, non-adenocarcinoma histology, poorly differentiated tumors, VPI, LVI, positive resection margins, more advanced stage (stage II–IV), and type of primary malignancy other than breast or thyroid cancer. However, only poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 1), higher preoperative CEA levels (≥ 5 ng/mL), poorly differentiated tumors, more advanced stage (stage II–IV), and type of primary malignancy other than breast or thyroid cancer were independent factors significantly associated with poor OS in the multivariate analysis (Table 4).

There was a significant difference in OS between patients with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. The 5-year OS in patients with lung cancer only was 94.3%, whereas it was 88.8% in patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies (p = 0.032). After excluding patients with previous breast or thyroid cancer, the difference in 5-year OS between patients with lung cancer only and those with previous extrapulmonary malignancies was even larger (94.3 vs. 81.1%; p < 0.001), as no patients with previous breast or thyroid cancer died during follow-up, and previous breast and thyroid cancers were independent factors associated with better OS (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Clinicopathological Features of Patients With Lung Cancer With Previous Extrapulmonary Malignancies

Among the 200 patients with lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies, breast, gastrointestinal, and thyroid cancers were the most frequent previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Of the 34 patients with gastrointestinal cancer, 20 had colorectal cancer, six had gastric cancer, five had liver cancer, one had pancreatic cancer, one had gallbladder cancer, and one had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (Figure 2A). As stated above, previous breast or thyroid cancer was associated with improved survival compared to other previous extrapulmonary malignancies. There were only two patients with stage IV lung cancer and zero pneumonectomy or bilobectomy in this group. Furthermore, by analyzing the available data on the staging of previous extrapulmonary malignancies, majority of the patients present with early breast and thyroid cancer. Conversely, previous gastrointestinal, head and neck, or gynecological cancer was associated with poor survival, with hazard ratios of 3.162 (p = 0.025), 5.017 (p = 0.006), and 6.162 (p < 0.001), respectively (Supplementary Figure 1; Supplementary Tables 1, 3).

Figure 2

The mean interval between the diagnosis of a previous extrapulmonary malignancy and that of primary lung cancer was 5.4 ± 5.8 years. Approximately half of the patients (n = 112; 56.0%) had an interval of ≤ 5 years (Figure 2B). There was no significant correlation between the interval between tumor diagnoses and OS (Supplementary Table 1).

Discussion

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States and worldwide (17). The outcomes of patients with lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies have received much attention in recent decades. However, the impact of previous malignancies on survival and prognosis is still not clearly defined. Our study showed that the incidence of previous extrapulmonary malignancies was 8.3% in patients with primary lung cancer. Several clinicopathological features, including age, sex, a family history of lung cancer, and preoperative CEA levels, were significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, patients with previous breast or thyroid cancer had significantly better OS than those without previous malignancies. Conversely, patients with other previous extrapulmonary malignancies had significantly poorer OS.

The incidence of previous extrapulmonary malignancies in our study was similar to those reported previously (1–22%) (7, 8, 18–26). Corresponding to an increase in the incidence of multiple primary cancers, a surge of 5.7% in lung cancer as a second primary malignancy was also noted between 1988–1992 and 2011–2014 in the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (19). Aside from common risk factors, such as cancer-promoting lifestyle factors and environmental interactions (27), genetic predisposition in the form of germline mutations (28, 29) and the subsequent carcinogenic effects of cancer treatment have been reported as potential mechanisms for the development of multiple primary cancers. Additional lung cancer risk was observed in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma who were treated with radiotherapy (30, 31). A meta-analysis of 13 studies demonstrated that radiotherapy for breast cancer was significantly associated with a relative risk of 1.22 for second lung cancer (32), with an excess relative risk of 8.5% per Gray (33). Another well-established explanation for the growing incidence of multiple primary tumors is the prolonged survival rates of patients with cancer combined with increased concern over personal health and surveillance among cancer survivors (8).

Supplementary Table 2 reviews several studies that examined clinicopathological features in patients with lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Some reported that patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies were older (18, 20, 23, 24). We found similar results; in our study, these patients were ~2 years older than those without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. This may be attributable to the longer exposure to carcinogens and greater genetic susceptibility in older individuals (34). These patients also had higher preoperative CEA levels. This marker underlies a distinct characteristic of extra- or intrapulmonary adenocarcinoma among patients with multiple primary malignancies (35). However, smoking habits between the two study subgroups did not differ, which agrees with the mathematical modeling of the Liverpool Lung Project (LLP). By showing a higher impact of cumulative non-smoking risk on lung cancer over smoking alone, additive effects of lung disease and environmental exposures should be recognized in the non-smoking population (36). Another significant feature that contradicted with accepted knowledge is the lower incidence of a family history of lung cancer. This may indicate a different etiology in this subgroup, corresponding with those of previous studies suggesting that the occurrence of multiple malignancies may be multifactorial in origin (20–23, 26). Further studies are warranted to investigate the hereditary contribution toward tumorigenesis in this subgroup.

Exposure to prior cancer treatment may lead to treatment intolerance in subsequent cancers. This affects the surgeons' selection of surgical methods and postoperative management. However, our results showed no differences in preoperative pulmonary reserve or intraoperative surgical margins in patients with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Therefore, there was no need for extra consideration of surgical method selection, tumor approach, or preference for non-intubated airway management. Moreover, surgical blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, and chest tube duration did not differ between the two groups, indicating that no special care was needed. This result corresponds with those of several previous studies (23, 25).

Because of the undetermined interference caused by the previous cancer, whether to include patients with multiple primary malignancies in clinical trials remains controversial (37–40). Our results indicate that some previous extrapulmonary malignancies have a negative impact on survival. However, it is noteworthy that prior breast or thyroid cancer resulted in a better outcome. Higher performance status, lower CEA levels, well and moderately differentiated tumors, and early-stage cancers also served as favorable prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Broader inclusion of different subgroups of patients with lung cancer in future clinical trials is necessary to expand their authenticity and generalizability. The factors we identified may serve as the eligibility criteria to confirm equality between patients with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Notably, in our study, the interval between the diagnoses of the two cancers was concentrated in the first 5 years and did not significantly impact survival trends. This calls into question the legitimacy of the current practice of excluding prior cancer within 5 years of enrollment and underscores the concerns of excluding specific groups of patients.

Breast cancer was the most common previous extrapulmonary malignancy reported by our and other studies (7, 8, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25). This may have accounted for the higher proportion of female patients in our group with lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. According to the Taiwan Cancer Registry, breast and lung cancer have been among the top three most common cancers since 2003. The launch of a national screening program for breast cancer (41) and the recent advocation of low-dose CT (42) have been reported as factors contributing to this phenomenon, leading to greater discovery of both cancers.

Our results should be interpreted in light of several limitations. First, the study cohort only consisted of surgically treated patients. This may have underestimated the overall incidence of lung cancer in patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Nevertheless, as the largest tertiary hospital in Taiwan, one-third of the early lung cancer resections in the country are performed at our institution, which provides an adequate number of samples. Second, as a single-center, retrospective study, our results may not be generalizable to the entire population. Although further studies are required in patients of different ethnic backgrounds, we reduce other possible bias by conducting our research over a short period of time and treat our patients under similar operative protocol. Third, because of the lack of data linkage between hospitals, we are incapable of knowing the status of previous malignancies, if they were evaluated and treated outside our hospital. However, by analyzing the existing documentation in the electronic medical record, we did make an effort to explore the additional relationships between previous cancer staging and lung cancer outcome.

In conclusion, lung cancer was more likely to develop in patients with previous breast, gastrointestinal, or thyroid cancer within 5 years after the first primary malignancy diagnosis. Although OS was lower in patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies, previous breast or thyroid cancer did not increase mortality. Our findings may help surgeons to predict the prognosis in this subgroup of patients with primary lung cancer, and to arrange follow-up examinations more frequently.

Funding

The authors declare that this study received funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [grant number: 107-2221-E-002-080-MY3], National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan [grant number: NTUH109-S4659] and Taiwan Lung Foundation. The funder had the following involvement with the study: English language editing and article processing fee. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1.

  PaoWChmieleckiJ. Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2010) 10:760–74. 10.1038/nrc2947

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  DemandanteCGTroyerDAMilesTP. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: case report and a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol. (2003) 26:79–83. 10.1097/00000421-200302000-00015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  RossoSTerraciniLRicceriFZanettiR. Multiple primary tumours: incidence estimation in the presence of competing risks. Popul Health Metr. (2009) 7:5. 10.1186/1478-7954-7-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  LinMWWuCTKuoSWChangYLYangPC. Clinicopathology and genetic profile of synchronous multiple small adenocarcinomas: implication for surgical treatment of an uncommon lung malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. (2014) 21:2555–62. 10.1245/s10434-014-3642-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  BillrothT. Die allgemeine chirurgische pathologie und therapie in 51 vorlesungen: ein handbuch fur studirende und aerzte. Berlin: Auflage (1889).

  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  CahanWG. Multiple primary cancers, one of which is lung. Surg Clin North Am. (1969) 49:323–35. 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)38791-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  HofmannHSNeefHSchmidtP. Primary lung cancer and extrapulmonary malignancy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2007) 32:653–8. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.06.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  HuXLXuSTWangXCHouDNBaoCYangDet al. Lung cancer patients with a previous extra-pulmonary malignancy should not be considered homogeneous: a clinicopathological analysis of 3530 surgical cases. Clin Transl Oncol. (2019) 21:348–54. 10.1007/s12094-018-1933-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  LinEPLinCHYangCYLuTPChangSNHsiaoTHet al. Population-based cohort study reveals distinct associations between female lung cancer and breast cancer in Taiwan. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. (2018) 2:1–14. 10.1200/CCI.18.00065

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  BudnikJDeNunzioNJSinghDPMilanoMT. Second primary non-small-cell lung cancer after head and neck cancer: a population-based study of clinical and pathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in 3597 patients. Clin Lung Cancer. (2020) 21:195–203. 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.02.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  DikshitRPBoffettaPBouchardyCMerlettiFCrosignaniPCuchiTet al. Risk factors for the development of second primary tumors among men after laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. (2005) 103:2326–33. 10.1002/cncr.21051

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  HollandJMArsanjaniALiemBJHoffeltSCCohenJIStevensKR. Second malignancies in early stage laryngeal carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. J Laryngol Otol. (2002) 116:190–3. 10.1258/0022215021910500

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  TravisWDBrambillaENicholsonAGYatabeYAustinJHMBeasleyMBet al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol. (2015) 10:1243–60. 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  Rami-PortaRAsamuraHTravisWDRuschVW. Lung cancer - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. (2017) 67:138–55. 10.3322/caac.21390

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  GiulianoAEConnollyJLEdgeSBMittendorfEARugoHSSolinLJet al. Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual: Updates to the AJCC Breast TNM Staging System: The 8th Edition. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. (2017) 67:290–303. 10.3322/caac.21393

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  PerrierNDBrierleyJDTuttleRM. Differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual: Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: AJCC Staging Manual Eighth Edition Changes. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:55–63. 10.3322/caac.21439

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  SiegelRLMillerKDJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. (2019) 69:7–34. 10.3322/caac.21551

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  DoninNMKwanLLenisATDrakakiAChamieK. Second primary lung cancer in United States cancer survivors, 1992–2008. Cancer Causes Control. (2019) 30:465–75. 10.1007/s10552-019-01161-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  DengLHarð*ardottírHSongHXiaoZJiangCWangQet al. Mortality of lung cancer as a second primary malignancy: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Med. (2019) 8:3269–77. 10.1002/cam4.2172

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  ShanSSheJXueZQSuCXRenSXWuFY. Clinical characteristics and survival of lung cancer patients associated with multiple primary malignancies. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0185485. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185485

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  LuMSChenMFHuangYKLiuHPTsaiYH. Clinical outcome in lung cancer with a second malignancy: the time sequence matters. Med (Baltimore). (2016) 95:e5203. 10.1097/MD.0000000000005203

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  ReinmuthNStumpfPStumpfAMuleyTKobingerSHoffmannHet al. Characteristics of lung cancer after a previous malignancy. Respir Med. (2014) 108:910–7. 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.02.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  PagèsPBMordantPGrandBBadiaAFoucaultCDujonAet al. History of multiple previous malignancies should not be a contraindication to the surgical resection of lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. (2013) 95:1000–5. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.072

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  PagèsPBMordantPCazesAGrandBFoucaultCDujonAet al. Prognosis of lung cancer resection in patients with previous extra-respiratory solid malignancies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2013) 44:534–8. 10.1093/ejcts/ezt031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  QuadrelliSLyonsGColtHChimondeguyDSilvaC. Lung cancer as a second primary malignancy: increasing prevalence and its influence on survival. Ann Surg Oncol. (2009) 16:1033–8. 10.1245/s10434-008-0296-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  FurákJTrojánISzökeTWolfárdANagyENémethIet al. Lung cancer as a second primary malignant tumor: prognostic values after surgical resection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2008) 7:50–3. 10.1510/icvts.2007.160846

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  VermaM. Cancer Epidemiology. New York: Humana Press. (2009).

  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  HisadaMGarberJEFungCYFraumeniJF Li FP. Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. (1998) 90:606–11. 10.1093/jnci/90.8.606

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  CheungMKadariyaYTalarchekJPeiJOharJAKayalehOR. Germline BAP1 mutation in a family with high incidence of multiple primary cancers and a potential gene-environment interaction. Cancer Lett. (2015) 369:261–5. 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.09.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  van LeeuwenFESomersRTaalBGvan HeerdePCosterBDozemanTet al. Increased risk of lung cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and leukemia following Hodgkin's disease. J Clin Oncol. (1989) 7:1046–58. 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.8.1046

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  van LeeuwenFEKlokmanWJHagenbeekANoyonRvan den Belt-DuseboutAWvan KerkhoffEHet al. Second cancer risk following Hodgkin's disease: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. (1994) 12:312–25. 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.2.312

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  GrantzauTOvergaardJ. Risk of second non-breast cancer after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 762,468 patients. Radiother Oncol. (2015) 114:56–65. 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.10.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  GrantzauTThomsenMSVæthMOvergaardJ. Risk of second primary lung cancer in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. (2014) 111:366–73. 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.05.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  AunanJRChoWCSøreideK. The biology of aging and cancer: a brief overview of shared and divergent molecular hallmarks. Aging Dis. (2017) 8:628–42. 10.14336/AD.2017.0103

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  EganMLToddCW. Carcinoembryonic antigen: synthesis by a continuous line of adenocarcinoma cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. (1972) 49:887–9. 10.1093/jnci/49.3.887

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  Bravo-IñiguezCEFoxSWDe LeonLETarascioJNJaklitschMTJacobsonFL. Cumulative nonsmoking risk factors increase the probability of developing lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2019) 158:1248–54.e1. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.098

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  GerberDELaccettiALXuanLHalmEAPruittSL. Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2014) 106:dju302. 10.1093/jnci/dju302

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  LaccettiALPruittSLXuanLHalmEAGerberDE. Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2015) 107:djv002. 10.1093/jnci/djv002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  PruittSLLaccettiALXuanLHalmEAGerberDE. Revisiting a longstanding clinical trial exclusion criterion: impact of prior cancer in early-stage lung cancer. Br J Cancer. (2017) 116:717–25. 10.1038/bjc.2017.27

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  LaccettiALPruittSLXuanLHalmEAGerberDE. Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: a national SEER-Medicare analysis. Lung Cancer. (2016) 98:106–13. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  Health Promotion Administration. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Annual report of health promotion administration. Taiwan (2017).

  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  YangP. MS16.04 National lung screening program in Taiwan. J Thorac Oncol. (2018) 13:S274–5. 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0020

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar