In the published article, there was an error in form of a distortion of words concerning the results of one comparison (COP-MedLat vs. COP-CranCaud). While the tables (Table 4 and Table 5), discussion and conclusion offer the right findings, the abstract and conclusion state the opposing.
A correction has been made to Abstract, page 1.
This sentence previously stated:
“The mediolateral COP displacement was significantly greater than the craniocaudal COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The craniocaudal COP displacement was significantly greater than the mediolateral COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude.”
A correction has been made to Results, 3.3 Center of pressure, page 6, paragraph 6.
This sentence previously stated:
“The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-MedLat than in COP-CranCaud during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-CranCaud than COP-MedLat during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
canine balance, center of pressure, postural stability, posturography, veterinary rehabilitation, external mechanical perturbations
Citation
Lutonsky C, Peham C, Mucha M, Reicher B, Gaspar R, Tichy A and Bockstahler B (2025) Corrigendum: External mechanical perturbations challenge postural stability in dogs. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1630608. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1630608
Received
18 May 2025
Accepted
26 May 2025
Published
10 June 2025
Volume
12 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Ali Mobasheri, University of Oulu, Finland
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Lutonsky, Peham, Mucha, Reicher, Gaspar, Tichy and Bockstahler.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christiane Lutonsky Christiane.lutonsky@vetmeduni.ac.at
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.