Evaluation of the Immunochromatographic NG-Test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT for Rapid Detection of KPC-, NDM-, IMP-, VIM-type, and OXA-48-like Carbapenemase Among Enterobacterales

Abstract

Background:

Enterobacterales are the most common pathogens for nosocomial infections. The emergence and spread of KPC, NDM, and OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales with their extensively drug-resistant characteristics have posed great threats to public health. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT for rapid detection of five carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like) among Enterobacterales.

Methods:

A total of 186 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates and 29 reference strains were used in this study. Carbapenemase genes were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. The sensitivities and specificities of these assays were calculated utilizing the VassarStats software.

Results:

For clinical isolates, the NG-test Carba 5 detected KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, IMP, and VIM in less than 15 min with the sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 100%, respectively. The RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. detected KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, and VIM with the sensitivity and specificity of 99.4 and 100%. The IMP K-SeT detected all of the IMP producers (6/6). For reference strains, the sensitivity and specificity of NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT were all 100 and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion:

As efficient, rapid, and convenient diagnostic methods, NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT could help to simplify the complex routine workflow for detecting carbapenemases. Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemase is of significance for both epidemiological and infection control purposes.

Introduction

The emergence and dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) pose a global health threat (Nordmann et al., 2012a). As the ability of carbapenemases to hydrolyze all β-lactam antibiotics leads to few antibiotics retaining activity against CPE, infections caused by CPE are usually burdened by high mortality and poor prognoses (Falagas et al., 2014; Feil, 2016). Tigecycline, colistin, and ceftazidime-avibactam are the only available antimicrobial agents for the treatment of infections caused by CPE in China. However, unlike tigecycline and colistin, the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam is varied to different CPE. The in vitro studies show that ceftazidime-avibactam has excellent in vitro activity against ESBL-, AmpC-, KPC-, and OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales, but has no activity against metallo-beta-lactamases Enterobacterales (Shirley, 2018; Yin et al., 2019). As reported, for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections, initial adequate antibiotic therapy resulted in the only independent factor able to protect against death (Micozzi et al., 2017). Therefore, rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is critical for both epidemiological and infection control purposes.

Recently, rapid diagnostic tests, NG-test Carba 5 immunochromatographic assay (NG Biotech, Guipry, France), and RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. (CORIS, BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium) have been developed to detect the five main carbapenemases, namely, KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, IMP, and VIM. To date, several studies have evaluated the performance of NG-test Carba 5 and demonstrated that it performed well on bacterial colonies and positive blood cultures with overall sensitivity and specificity that ranged from 97.3 to 100% and 95.3 to 100%, respectively (Boutal et al., 2018; Hopkins et al., 2018; Bodendoerfer et al., 2019; Giordano et al., 2019). The RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. detected KPC-type and OXA-48-like carbapenemases from blood cultures with a sensitivity of 100% for both, but 50.0 and 52.2% for NDM- and VIM-type carbapenemases, respectively (Bianco et al., 2020). Comparative studies evaluating the performance of different lateral flow chromatographic assays to detect carbapenemase from bacterial colonies are lacking in China. In this study, we investigated the performance of NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT assay to detect carbapenemases among CPE.

Materials and Methods

Strains

From January 2016 to December 2018, 186 non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected from 32 hospitals of 22 provinces or cities across China, and 29 reference strains were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection¹. These clinical isolates were resistant to at least one of the carbapenem antibiotics (ertapenem, meropenem, or imipenem), including 124K. pneumoniae, 26 Escherichia coli, 23 Enterobacter cloacae, 5 Klebsiella oxytoca, 2 Citrobacter freundi, 2 Enterobacter aerogenes, 2 Serratia marcescens, 1 Morganella morganii, and 1 Providencia rettgeri. Twenty-nine reference strains (including 17 K. pneumoniae, 8 E. coli, 1 E. cloacae, 1 K. oxytoca, 1 P. rettgeri, and 1 Enterobacter hormaechei) with or without carbapenemase were involved in this study (Table 1). All tested isolates were identified to the species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (bioMérieux, France).

Detection of Carbapenemase genes

For 186 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) clinical strains, carbapenemase genes (bla_KPC, bla_NDM, bla_{OXA–48–like}, bla_IMP, and bla_VIM) were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primers and conditions as described previously (Poirel et al., 2011). The positive PCR amplicons were sequenced and compared with the reported sequences from GenBank by Blast². As a result, 172 were positive for carbapenemase genes, including bla_KPC–2 (n = 70), bla_NDM–1 (n = 35), bla_NDM–5 (n = 23), bla_NDM–7 (n = 1), bla_NDM–9 (n = 1), bla_OXA–232 (n = 20), bla_OXA–181 (n = 2), bla_OXA–48 (n = 2), bla_IMP–4 (n = 5), bla_IMP–6 (n = 1), bla_VIM (n = 1), bla_KPC–2 plus bla_NDM–1 (7/7), bla_KPC–2 plus bla_NDM–5 (1/1), bla_NDM–5 plus bla_OXA–48 (1/1), bla_NDM–1 plus bla_IMP–4 (1/1), and bla_NDM–1 plus bla_IMP–6 (1/1). Fourteen CRE clinical strains were carbapenemase-negative.

Immunochromatographic Assays

The NG-Test Carba 5 assay consists of an independent cassette (targets KPC-, NDM-, VIM-, and IMP-type and OXA-48-like five main carbapenemases). RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. consists of two independent K-SeTs (one for the detection of OXA-163, OXA-48-like, and KPC; another for the detection of VIM and NDM). Both cassettes are provided in a single package and are to be used in parallel on the same bacterial lysis preparation. IMP K-SeT consists of a K-SeT for the detection of IMP metallo-β-lactamase, which was performed as a complementary test of RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V.

These tests were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions in parallel. Firstly, one single isolated colony of overnight growth was harvested from the plate to an Eppendorf tube or tube with extraction buffer and suspended thoroughly to perform the lysis step. Subsequently, approximately 100 μl of the mixture was loaded on the sample region of the cassette and allowed to migrate for 15 min. Finally, the results were read until the control line turned red in the control region and then recorded whether the lines turned red in the test region of the cassette 15 min later.

Statistical Analysis

The sensitivity and specificity of the assay and upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated utilizing the VassarStats software³.

Results

The NG-test Carba 5 and RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. showed the detection of 100% of KPC-2 (70/70), NDM-5 (23/23), NDM-7 (1/1), VIM (1/1), OXA-232 (20/20), OXA-181 (2/2), and OXA-48 (2/2) with no false positive. This study also demonstrated that 100% of IMP-4 (5/5) and IMP-6 (1/1) were correctly detected by NG-test Carba 5 and IMP K-SeT. NG-test Carba 5 showed the detection of 100% of NDM-1 (35/35), whereas RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. showed the detection of 97.1% of NDM-1 (34/35) except one P. rettgeri. Moreover, NG-test Carba 5 and RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. were able to detect double carbapenemases-producers simultaneously, and the results showed 100% of KPC-2 plus NDM-1 (7/7)-, KPC-2 plus NDM-5 (1/1)-, and NDM-5 plus OXA-48 (1/1)-producing isolates with two red positive lines in the test region. All of the non-carbapenemase (0/14) producers were negative in the tests (Table 2). Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of NG-test Carba 5 to detect five main carbapenemases were both 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. were 99.4 and 100%, respectively (Table 2).

For the 29 reference strains, NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT detected all KPC-2 (14/14), NDM-1 (6/6), OXA-48 (2/2), OXA-181 (1/1), VIM-1 (2/2), and IMP-1 producers (1/1) (Table 1). Three ESBL producers were negative without cross-reaction. The overall sensitivity and specificity of NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT detecting carbapenemases were all 100 and 100%, respectively (Table 2).

Discussion

Of note, the rapid detection and identification of carbapenemase can help to prevent the spread and infection control of carbapenemase-producing isolates in health facilities (Boutal et al., 2018; Takissian et al., 2019). A nationwide survey indicated that bla_KPC–2 (57% and 627/1,105) and bla_NDM (31% and 343/1,105) were the most common carbapenemase genes among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates in China (Zhang et al., 2017; Han et al., 2020). Rapid identification of the carbapenemase type can help to guide therapy for the treatment of infection caused by carbapenemase-producing isolates. As reported, most KPC-2 or OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing isolates are susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (Falcone and Paterson, 2016; Bassetti et al., 2018; Stewart et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2019). On the contrary, ceftazidime-avibactam has no activities against metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-, VIM-, or IMP-type) producers; thus other therapeutic options have to be considered, such as tigecycline, colistin, or other available antimicrobial agents (Davido et al., 2017; Zusman et al., 2017; Jayol et al., 2018; Emeraud et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2019; Zou et al., 2019).

Currently, several phenotypic methods have been developed for the detection and identification of carbapenemases. Modified carbapenem inactivation methods (mCIMs) had sensitivities ranging from 93 to 100% and specificities from 97 to 100% for the detection of CPE, and excellent reproducibility was shown across laboratories (Pierce et al., 2017; Tsai et al., 2020). The mCIM and EDTA-CIM detected metallo-carbapenemases with a sensitivity of 89.3% and a specificity of 98.7% (Tsai et al., 2020). The mCIM was easy to perform and interpret for Enterobacterales, but time-consuming (overnight incubation). Besides, invalid or uncertain results may occur with some isolates, and certain carbapenemase types are not detected consistently.

Carba NP test detected most carbapenemases with high sensitivities from 73 to 100% among Enterobacterales, but with low sensitivity in detecting OXA-48-like carbapenemase producers (Nordmann et al., 2012b; Tijet et al., 2013; Vasoo et al., 2013; Yusuf et al., 2014; Papagiannitsis et al., 2015; Tamma et al., 2017). The modified Carba NP test had a sensitivity of 99% (Tamma et al., 2017). One limitation of the manual versions of the Carba NP test and its variants was frequent reagent preparation due to the short shelf life of the imipenem-containing solution. Other commercially available assays, including the Rapidec Carba NP test, the Neo-Rapid Carb screen, and the Rapid Carb Blue screen have sensitivities ranging from 89 to 98% and specificities approaching 100% (Tamma et al., 2017). Similar to the Carba NP test, the limitations of these commercial assays are as follows: false-negative results occurred with OXA-48-like carbapenemase and the interpretation of results can be subjective due to slight color changes (Tamma and Simner, 2018). The sensitivites of the modified Hodge test (MHT) have been reported to be between 93 and 98% in KPC producers, but low sensitivites for metallo-beta-lactamases (Girlich et al., 2012; Mathers et al., 2013; Vasoo et al., 2013; Tsai et al., 2020). Reported sensitivities and specificities of MALDI-TOF MS ranged from 77 to 100% and 94 to 100%, respectively, with a turnaround time of within 4 h (Knox et al., 2014; Papagiannitsis et al., 2015; Oho et al., 2020). Carbapenemase inhibition tests with boronic acid derivatives (BA) and dipicolinic acid (DPA)/EDTA were tested in Enterobacterales. The sensitivity for identification of class A, B, and OXA-48 carbapenemases was 95, 90, and 100%, with 96 to 100% specificity (van Dijk et al., 2014).

Compared with the phenotypic method, the multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the detection of KPC-, NDM-, VIM-, IMP-, and OXA-48-like carbapenemases was easy to perform and only relatively little hands-on time (no more than 5 min) was required. Several studies assessing the immunochromatographic for the detection of common carbapenemases showed high sensitivity and specificity results in bacteria (Boutal et al., 2018; Hopkins et al., 2018; Bodendoerfer et al., 2019). The NG-test Carba 5 has evaluated the detection of CPE from spiked blood cultures with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.7 to 98.3% and 96.1 to 100%, respectively (Giordano et al., 2019; Takissian et al., 2019). The RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. detected KPC-type and OXA-48-like carbapenemases from blood cultures with a high sensitivity of 100%, but with low sensitivities of 50.0 and 52.2% in detecting NDM- and VIM-type carbapenemases, respectively, and the results were quite different from our research of NDM metallo-beta-lactamases (97.1% sensitivity) (Bianco et al., 2020).

The results of our study indicated that the NG-test Carba 5 showed the detection of 100% of KPC-2, NDM, VIM, and OXA-48-like with no false positive. The RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. showed 100% detection of KPC-2, OXA-48-like, IMP, and VIM, whereas it showed 97.1% detection of NDM-1 (34/35) with one false-negative result. We speculated that this might be associated with the mean intensity of NDM bands; NG-Test Carba 5 was 2.2 times higher than RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. (Bogaerts et al., 2020). Additionally, NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT were also able to detect two carbapenemases simultaneously with a sensitivity of 100%. Of concern, NG-test Carba 5 was not able to distinguish OXA-48-like variants (OXA- 48-, OXA- 181-, OXA- 163-, OXA- 232-, and OXA-405-type carbapenemase), and the OXA-163- and the OXA-405-producing strains might be considered as false-negative results for OXA-48-like carbapenemase producers (Boutal et al., 2018; Takissian et al., 2019). In this case, the RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. assay could fill this gap by specifically detecting OXA-163 (OXA-48-like variants) with a sensitivity of 100%, which was an updated version of the RESIST-3 O.O.K. K-SeT (Coris BioConcept) and the OXA-163/48 K-SeT (Coris BioConcept) (Meunier et al., 2016; Pasteran et al., 2016). Due to a lack of OXA-163 producers, we could not evaluate the ability of RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. in detecting OXA-163. The limited detection ranges of these assays cover only common carbapenemases, which lead to the neglect of rare carbapenemases like GES, IMI, and GIM.

Our study had three limitations. The first limitation is including only six bla_IMP-positive strains and one bla_VIM-positive strain. Second, there is a lack of other KPC- and OXA-48-like variant carbapenemases such KPC-3 and OXA-163 in this study; these variants are rare in China. Third, limited non-CPE isolates were used to assess the specificity of the assays, and we need to sufficiently investigate this isolates to evaluate the performance of these assays in this study. Recently, we collected one K. pneumoniae harboring a new variant, rare carbapenemase bla_KPC–33 (Shi et al., 2020), and we found that immunochromatographic assays cannot detect this new variant. Although other bla_KPC-positive strains including bla_KPC–3-, bla_KPC–33-, or bla_VIM-type metallo-β-lactamase positive strains are rare in China, we still need to collect these strains to make a more comprehensive assessment on the performance of immunochromatographic testing for detection of carbapenemases.

Conclusion

In conclusion, NG-test Carba 5, RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V., and IMP K-SeT assays could be efficient, rapid, and convenient diagnostic tools for detecting the most common carbapenemases in China. These might help to control the spread of carbapenemase-producing isolates in health facilities.

References

• 1

  BassettiM.GiacobbeD. R.GiamarellouH.ViscoliC.DaikosG. L.DimopoulosG.et al (2018). Management of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.24133–144. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  BiancoG.BoattiniM.van AstenS.IannacconeM.ZanottoE.ZaccariaT.et al (2020). RESIST-5 O.O.K.N.V. and NG-Test Carba 5 assays for the rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales from positive blood cultures: a comparative study.J. Hosp. Infect.105162–166. 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  BodendoerferE.KellerP. M.ManciniS. (2019). Rapid identification of NDM-, KPC-, IMP-, VIM- and OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales from blood cultures by a multiplex lateral flow immunoassay.J Antimicrob Chemother.741749–1751. 10.1093/jac/dkz056

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  BogaertsP.BergerA. S.EvrardS.HuangT. D. (2020). Comparison of two multiplex immunochromatographic assays for the rapid detection of major carbapenemases in Enterobacterales.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.751491–1494. 10.1093/jac/dkaa043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  BoutalH.VogelA.BernabeuS.DevilliersK.CretonE.CotellonG.et al (2018). A multiplex lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid identification of NDM-, KPC-, IMP- and VIM-type and OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.73909–915. 10.1093/jac/dkx521

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  DavidoB.FellousL.LawrenceC.MaximeV.RottmanM.DinhA. (2017). Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam, an Interesting Strategy To Overcome beta-Lactam Resistance Conferred by Metallo-beta-Lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.61:e01008-17. 10.1128/AAC.01008-17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  EmeraudC.EscautL.BouclyA.FortineauN.BonninR. A.NaasT.et al (2019). Aztreonam plus clavulanate, tazobactam, or avibactam for treatment of infections caused by metallo-beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.63:e00010-19. 10.1128/AAC.00010-19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  FalagasM. E.TansarliG. S.KarageorgopoulosD. E.VardakasK. Z. (2014). Deaths attributable to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.Emerg. Infect. Dis.201170–1175. 10.3201/eid2007.121004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  FalconeM.PatersonD. (2016). Spotlight on ceftazidime/avibactam: a new option for MDR Gram-negative infections.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.712713–2722. 10.1093/jac/dkw239

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  FeilE. J. (2016). Enterobacteriaceae: joining the dots with pan-European epidemiology.Lancet Infect. Dis.17118–119. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30333-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  GiordanoL.FioriB.D’InzeoT.ParisiG.LiottiF. M.MenchinelliG.et al (2019). Simplified testing method for direct detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms from positive blood cultures using the NG-test Carba 5 assay.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.63:e00550-19. 10.1128/AAC.00550-19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  GirlichD.PoirelL.NordmannP. (2012). Value of the modified Hodge test for detection of emerging carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae.J. Clin. Microbiol.50477–479. 10.1128/JCM.05247-11

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  HanR.ShiQ.WuS.YinD.PengM.DongD.et al (2020). Dissemination of carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from adult and children patients in China.Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.10:314. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00314

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  HopkinsK. L.MeunierD.NaasT.VollandH.WoodfordN. (2018). Evaluation of the NG-Test CARBA 5 multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the detection of KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, VIM and IMP carbapenemases.J. Antimicrob. Chemoth.733523–3526. 10.1093/jac/dky342

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  JayolA.NordmannP.PoirelL.DuboisV. (2018). Ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with aztreonam against colistin-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.73542–544. 10.1093/jac/dkx393

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  KnoxJ.JadhavS.SeviorD.AgyekumA.WhippM.WaringL.et al (2014). Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and the Carba NP test.J. Clin. Microbiol.524075–4077. 10.1128/JCM.02121-14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  MathersA. J.CarrollJ.SifriC. D.HazenK. C. (2013). Modified Hodge test versus indirect carbapenemase test: prospective evaluation of a phenotypic assay for detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) in Enterobacteriaceae.J. Clin. Microbiol.511291–1293. 10.1128/JCM.03240-12

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  MeunierD.VickersA.PikeR.HillR. L.WoodfordN.HopkinsK. L. (2016). Evaluation of the K-SeT R.E.S.I.S.T. immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of KPC and OXA-48-like carbapenemases: table 1.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.712357–2359. 10.1093/jac/dkw113

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  MicozziA.GentileG.MinottiC.CartoniC.CapriaS.BallaròD.et al (2017). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in high-risk haematological patients: factors favouring spread, risk factors and outcome of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremias.BMC Infect. Dis.17:203. 10.1186/s12879-017-2297-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  NordmannP.DortetL.PoirelL. (2012a). Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm!Trends Mol. Med.18263–272. 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.03.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  NordmannP.PoirelL.DortetL. (2012b). Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.Emerg. Infect. Dis.181503–1507. 10.3201/eid1809.120355

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  OhoM.FunashimaY.NagasawaZ.MiyamotoH.SueokaE. (2020). Rapid detection method of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by MALDI-TOF MS with imipenem/cilastatin (KB) disc and zinc sulfate solution.J. Infect. Chemother.[Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  PapagiannitsisC. C.ŠtudentováV.IzdebskiR.OikonomouO.PfeiferY.PetinakiE.et al (2015). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry meropenem hydrolysis assay with NH4HCO3, a reliable tool for direct detection of carbapenemase activity.J. Clin. Microbiol.531731–1735. 10.1128/JCM.03094-14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  PasteranF.DenormeL.OteI.GomezS.De BelderD.GlupczynskiY.et al (2016). Rapid identification of OXA-48 and OXA-163 subfamilies in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli with a novel immunochromatographic lateral flow assay.J. Clin. Microbiol.542832–2836. 10.1128/JCM.01175-16

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  PierceV. M.SimnerP. J.LonswayD. R.Roe-CarpenterD. E.JohnsonJ. K.BrassoW. B.et al (2017). Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae.J. Clin. Microbiol.552321–2333. 10.1128/JCM.00193-17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  PoirelL.WalshT. R.CuvillierV.NordmannP. (2011). Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes.Diagn. Micr. Infect. Dis.70119–123. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  ShiQ.YinD.HanR.GuoY.ZhengY.WuS.et al (2020). Emergence and recovery of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in bla_{KPC–_33}-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 11 isolates in China.Clin. Infect. Dis.71S436–S439. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1521

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  ShirleyM. (2018). Ceftazidime-avibactam: a review in the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections.Drugs78675–692. 10.1007/s40265-018-0902-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  StewartA.HarrisP.HendersonA.PatersonD. (2018). Treatment of infections by OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.62:e01195-18. 10.1128/AAC.01195-18

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  TakissianJ.BonninR. A.NaasT.DortetL. (2019). NG-test carba 5 for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales from positive blood cultures.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.63:e00011-19. 10.1128/AAC.00011-19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  TammaP. D.OpeneB. N.GluckA.ChambersK. K.CarrollK. C.SimnerP. J. (2017). Comparison of 11 phenotypic assays for accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.J. Clin. Microbiol.551046–1055. 10.1128/JCM.02338-16

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  TammaP. D.SimnerP. J. (2018). Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms from clinical isolates.J. Clin. Microbiol.56:e01140-18. 10.1128/JCM.01140-18

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  TijetN.BoydD.PatelS. N.MulveyM. R.MelanoR. G. (2013). Evaluation of the Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.574578–4580. 10.1128/AAC.00878-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  TsaiY. M.WangS.ChiuH. C.KaoC. Y.WenL. L. (2020). Combination of modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and EDTA-CIM (eCIM) for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.BMC Microbiol.20:315. 10.1186/s12866-020-02010-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  van DijkK.VoetsG. M.ScharringaJ.VoskuilS.FluitA. C.RottierW. C.et al (2014). A disc diffusion assay for detection of class A, B and OXA-48 carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae using phenyl boronic acid, dipicolinic acid and temocillin.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.20345–349. 10.1111/1469-0691.12322

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  VasooS.CunninghamS. A.KohnerP. C.SimnerP. J.MandrekarJ. N.LolansK.et al (2013). Comparison of a novel, rapid chromogenic biochemical assay, the Carba NP test, with the modified Hodge test for detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli.J. Clin. Microbiol.513097–3101. 10.1128/JCM.00965-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  YinD.WuS.YangY.ShiQ.DongD.ZhuD.et al (2019). Results from the china antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2017 of the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.63:e02431-18. 10.1128/AAC.02431-18

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  YusufE.Van Der MeerenS.SchallierA.PiérardD. (2014). Comparison of the Carba NP test with the Rapid CARB Screen Kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.332237–2240. 10.1007/s10096-014-2199-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  ZhangR.LiuL.ZhouH.ChanE. W.LiJ.FangY.et al (2017). Nationwide surveillance of clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) strains in China.EBioMedicine1998–106. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.032

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  ZouH.XiongS. J.LinQ. X.WuM. L.NiuS. Q.HuangS. F. (2019). CP-CRE/non-CP-CRE stratification and CRE resistance mechanism determination help in better managing CRE bacteremia using ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam.Infect. Drug Resist.123017–3027. 10.2147/IDR.S219635

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  ZusmanO.AltuninS.KoppelF.DishonB. Y.GedikH.PaulM. (2017). Polymyxin monotherapy or in combination against carbapenem-resistant bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.7229–39. 10.1093/jac/dkw377

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article