Abstract
We present a statistical study on dense molecular gas tracers of HCN (4–3), HCO+ (4–3) lines and molecular tracers of [C i], and CO observations for a sample of 26 infrared bright star-forming (SF) galaxies. We investigate the dependence of dense gas star formation efficiency traced by HCN (4–3), HCO+ (4–3) (that is , and ), and luminosity ratio of on [C i]-CO ratios of , and (hereafter R[CI]) which are sensitive to interstellar medium conditions. Our findings show that both and have moderate correlations with and R[CI], while does not show any significant correlations with any of the [C i]-CO ratios. We compare the ratios of AGN and SF galaxies, and find that although the higher ratios are mainly found in AGN, the majority of the values in SF galaxies are comparable to those in AGN. Based on our findings, it appears that the ratio may not be a reliable indicator of the presence of an AGN, although further investigation is needed to confirm this conclusion.
1 Introduction
In the past two decades, observational and theoretical studies have shown that molecular gas (Kennicutt, 1998; ; ; Kennicutt and Evans, 2012), especially the dense molecular gas (Solomon et al., 1992; ; ; Wu et al., 2005; ; ; ; ; Zhang et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2018; Jiménez-Donaire et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021) with a volume density of n > 104cm−3 which can be traced by molecular emission lines with high critical densities as HCN and HCO+, plays a significant role in star formation.
Using a large survey of HCN (1–0) emission from nearby normal spiral galaxies to ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs), found a tight linear correlation between the infrared (IR) and HCN luminosities. Observations on smaller scales, such as resolved galaxy structures (; ; Usero et al., 2015; ; Shimajiri et al., 2017; Jiménez-Donaire et al., 2019), Galactic giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the Milky Way (Wu et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2010; Lada et al., 2010; Lada et al., 2012; ), have shown that this linearity continues to large GMC associations and even individual dense cores in the Milky Way, spanning over eight orders of magnitude. Moreover, the correlation extends to possibly high-z galaxies and QSOs as well (; Oteo et al., 2017).
In addition to HCN (1–0), linear correlations of have also been found in many other dense gas tracers, e.g., HCO+, HNC, CS, CN, CO and HCN with high-J transitions (; ; Reiter et al., 2011; ; Zhang et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015; Oteo et al., 2017; ; Tan et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021), in both Galactic dense cores and external galaxies. surveyed J = 1–0 transitions of HCN, HNC, HCO+, CN, as well as CN (2–1) and CS (3–2) in nearby LIRGs, and found strong relations between the integrated emissions of high-density tracer molecules with far-infrared luminosities. Liu et al. (2015) presented nine CO transitions (from J = 4–3 to J = 12–11) in a largest sample of 167 local galaxies, and found that all the nine CO transitions are linearly and tightly correlated with the far-infrared (far-IR) luminosities.
Using HCN (4–3), HCO+ (4–3), and CS (7–6) observations in 20 nearby star-forming (SF) galaxies, Zhang et al. (2014) found tight and linear correlations between the luminosity of IR and that of molecular lines for all three dense gas tracers which probe molecular gas with density higher than 106 cm−3. And this linear correlation continues to Galactic dense clumps (Liu et al., 2016). Tan et al. (2018) mapped HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions in six nearby SF galaxies, which is part of the survey called Mapping the dense molecular gas in the strongest star-forming galaxies (MALATANG; PI: Y. Gao) with the JCMT telescope. They found that the measured linear relations in nearby spatially resolved galaxies follow the linear correlations established globally in galaxies within the scatters, bridging the gap between Milky Way clouds and galaxy integrated observations. MALATANG is the first systematic survey of the spatially resolved observations of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions with JCMT in a large sample of nearby galaxies. In the first stage of MALATANG, Tan et al. (2018) and Jiang et al. (2020) have observed 23 galaxies with six galaxies mapped in the central 2′ × 2′ region (i.e., kpc) and the others mapped along the major axes. MALATANG-II expands the sample with 5 additional IR-bright galaxies in the EMPIRE (EMIR Multiline Probe of the ISM Regulating Galaxy Evolution) survey (; Jiménez-Donaire et al., 2019). The details of the MALATANG description, sample, and data are given in Zhang et al. (in preparation, see also Tan et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2020).
Recent observations, especially those involving large-scale mapping with high resolution, show that there is a linear relationship between and LIR from GMC in the Milky Way to high-z galaxies over ten orders of magnitude, whereas systematic variations are also observed among them. Based on the 62 HCN (1–0) observed positions across 29 nearby star-forming galaxies, Usero et al. (2015) found that the IR−to−HCN ratio (that is star formation efficiency of dense molecular gas, SFEdense) in nearby galaxy centers is times lower than that in the galaxy disks. With large-scale mapping of HCN (1–0) in M 51, and also found that the SFEdense decreases in the nuclear region of M 51 when compared to the outer disk. Jiménez-Donaire et al. (2019) showed that the SFEdense of EMPIRE galaxies as traced by HCN (1–0), HCO+ (1–0), and HNC (1–0) increases with radius, and anti-correlates with stellar surface density, gas surface density, molecular-to-atomic gas ratio, and dynamical equilibrium pressure. However, the study of SFEdense in NGC 253, using dense gas traced by HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions, show an increasing trend with respect to the stellar surface density (Jiang et al., 2020).
Comparing to the dense molecular gas tracers, CO and [C i] (3P1 →3P0) [rest frequency: 492.161 GHz, hereafter [C i] (1–0)] and [C i] (3P2 →3P1) [rest frequency: 809.344 GHz, hereafter [C i] (2–1)] lines are widely used as total molecular gas tracers in galaxies near and far (e.g., Weiß et al., 2003; Weiß et al., 2005; Papadopoulos et al., 2004; Papadopoulos and Greve, 2004; ; ; Papadopoulos et al., 2022). Observations show that both [C i] emissions correlate well with CO emission in giant molecular cloud (; ; Shimajiri et al., 2013), and even perform well in tracing molecular gas in local IR luminous objects (; Krips et al., 2016; Jiao et al., 2017; Jiao et al., 2019), as well as star-forming galaxies at z > 1 (Popping et al., 2017; Valentino et al., 2018; Valentino et al., 2020; ), high-redshift sub-millimeter galaxies (SMGs, ; Yang et al. 2017) and protocluster galaxies (Lee et al., 2021). Theoretical models including turbulent (Offner et al., 2014; ), metallicity (), and cosmic ray (; ; Papadopoulos et al., 2018; ) also predict widespread [C i] emission maps which are similar to CO maps.
Jiao et al. (2017) found that both [C i] luminosities of and are correlated linearly with for a sample of nearby (ultra)luminous infrared galaxies observed with the Herschel Space Observatory (Herschel), and the linear correlation between with extends to SMGs up to z ≈ 6 (). Jiao et al. (2019) presented almost linear correlation between with both [C i] luminosities for a sample of nearby star-forming galaxies with a linear resolution around kpc, while they also found that the / and (hereafter R[CI]) ratios varies within galaxies and shows centrally peaked in starbursts. presented significant correlation between the / with both dust temperature and LIR. These results indicate that the [C i]-CO and R[CI] ratios are expected to be sensitive to SFR intensity, due to CO dissociation by cosmic rays in high-SFR environments (; ; Papadopoulos et al., 2018). Besides, the [C i]-CO ratios may be affected by AGN, as CO is significantly depleted by X-rays from the central AGN region (Meijerink and Spaans, 2005; Meijerink et al., 2007). Izumi et al. (2020) found that both [CI](1–0)/12CO(2–1) and [CI](1–0)/13CO(1–0) ratios tend to have higher values in AGNs compared to starburst and quiescent galaxies. Moreover, the line ratio R[CI] can directly reflect excitation temperature in optically thin limit (Stutzki et al., 1997).
At present, the relationship between SFEdense and local physical conditions, such as the stellar surface density and gas pressure is still under debate. [C i]-CO and R[CI] ratios are sensitive to the excitation temperature, star-formation and AGN activities. In this work, we have selected a sample that includes J = 4–3 emissions of HCN and/or HCO+, as well as [C i] and CO (1–0) observations. Our aim is to investigate the possible correlation between the SFEdense with dense gas traced by HCN (4–3) and/or HCO+ (4–3) and the [C i]-CO ratios. We also aim to investigate the reliability of using ratio as an indicator of AGN. This paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we describe our sample selection and data reduction method. The results and discussion are presented in Section 3. In the last section we summarize the main conclusions.
2 Sample and data reduction method
Systematic survey of HCN (4–3), HCO+ (4–3), and both [C i] emissions are rare. The sample discussed here consists of sources with available observations of HCN (4–3) and/or HCO+ (4–3), and [C i] (1–0) and/or [C i] (2–1), which are currently as comprehensive as possible based on literature. We finally obtained three subsamples named: Tan18, Zhang14, and Imanishi18, respectively. The subsample of Tan18 consists of five spatially resolved nearby star-forming galaxies that were selected by cross-matching the MALATANG sample in Tan et al. (2018) and [C i] mapping from Jiao et al. (2019). Zhang et al. (2014) reported HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) observations in 20 nearby star-forming galaxies with the Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment (APEX) 12 m telescope. By cross matching the galaxies in Zhang et al. (2014) with [C i] data observed with Herschel in Lu et al. (2017) and , we finally obtain fifteen galaxies defined as subsample of Zhang14. We check the galaxies in , and find five of them have [C i] observations in literature (e.g., ; Kamenetzky et al., 2016; Jiao et al., 2017). We further add galaxy NGC 7469 which has ALMA observations of HCN (4–3), HCO+ (4–3), and [C i] from , Izumi et al. (2020), and define these six galaxies as subsample of Imanishi18. The Tan18 and Zhang14 samples consist of IR bright galaxies with Sν(100 μm) > 100 Jy, which was selected from Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (Sanders et al., 2003). Meanwhile, the Imanishi18 galaxies are classified as ULIRGs with LIR > 1012L⊙, except for IRAS 04315-0840 which is categorized as a LIRG with LIR ∼ 5 × 1011L⊙. In brief, the three subsamples encompasses galaxies with LIR ranging from 1010L⊙ to 1012.5L⊙, including nearby normal star-forming galaxies, starbursts, and AGN galaxies. The basic information of each galaxy in our sample is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
| Sample | Name | R.A. | Decl | Vh | HCN FWHM | HCN physical scale | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (hh:mm:ss) | (dd:mm:ss) | (km s−1) | (′′) | (kpc) | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
| M 82 | 09:55:52.7 | +69:40:45.8 | 203 | 14 | 0.24 | SF | |
| M 83 | 13:37:00.9 | −29:51:55.5 | 513 | 14 | 0.33 | SF | |
| Tan18 | NGC 253 | 00:47:33.1 | −25:17:17.6 | 243 | 14 | 0.24 | SF |
| NGC 1068 | 02:42:40.7 | −00:00:47.8 | 1,137 | 14 | 1.1 | AGN | |
| NGC 6946 | 20:34:52.3 | +60:09:14.1 | 40 | 14 | 0.32 | SF | |
| IC 1623 | 01:07:47.2 | −17:30:25.3 | 6,016 | 18 | 7.2 | SF | |
| NGC 3256 | 10:27:51.3 | −43:54:13.5 | 2,804 | 18 | 3.9 | SF | |
| NGC 4418 | 12:26:54.6 | −00:52:39.4 | 2,179 | 18 | 2.6 | AGN | |
| IRAS 13120–5453 | 13:15:06.4 | −55:09:23.2 | 9,222 | 18 | 11.2 | AGN | |
| NGC 6240 | 16:52:58.9 | +02:24:03.3 | 7,339 | 18 | 9.3 | AGN | |
| IRAS 17578–0400 | 18:00:31.9 | −04:00:53.3 | 4,210 | 18 | 5.3 | SF | |
| IRAS 18293–3413 | 18:32:41.1 | −34:11:27.2 | 5,449 | 18 | 6.8 | SF | |
| Zhang14 | NGC 7469 | 23:03:15.6 | +08:52:26.4 | 4,892 | 18 | 6.2 | AGN |
| NGC 7552 | 23:16:10.8 | −42:35:05.1 | 1,608 | 18 | 1.7 | SF | |
| NGC 7771 | 23:51:24.8 | +20:06:42.3 | 4,277 | 18 | 5.5 | SF | |
| Mrk 331 | 23:51:26.8 | +20:35:09.9 | 5,541 | 18 | 7.1 | AGN | |
| Arp 220 | 15:34:57.3 | +23:30:11.3 | 5,434 | 14 | 5.4 | AGN | |
| Mrk 231 | 12:56:14.2 | +56:52:25.2 | 12,642 | 14 | 12.3 | AGN | |
| NGC 4945 | 13:05:27.5 | −49:28:05.6 | 1,96 | 18 | 0.33 | AGN | |
| IC 342 | 03:46:48.5 | +68:05:46.9 | 31 | 20 | 0.38 | SF | |
| IRAS 08572 + 3915 | 09:00:25.4 | +39:03:54.4 | 17,493 | 1.8 × 1.1 | ∼1.5 | AGN | |
| IRAS 19254–7245 (Superantennae) | 19:31:21.4 | −72:39:18.0 | 18,500 | 0.76 × 0.44 | ∼0.69 | AGN | |
| Imanishi18 | IRAS 22491–1808 | 22:51:49.3 | −17:52:23.5 | 23,312 | 0.6 × 0.6 | 0.90 | AGN |
| IRAS 04315–0840 (NGC 1614) | 04:33:59.9 | −08:34:44.0 | 4,778 | 1.5 × 1.3 (3 × 3) | 0.96 | Cp | |
| IRAS 13451 + 1232 | 13:47:33.4 | +12:17:24.2 | 36,497 | 0.69 × 0.58 | ∼1.42 | AGN | |
| NGC 7469_A + B + C + D | 23:03:15.6 | +08:52:26.4 | 4,892 | 0.5 × 0.4 | ∼0.15 | AGN |
The basic properties of the galaxies for the three subsamples.
2.1 Data reduction for Tan18 subsample
The HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) data in subsample Tan18 are from Tan et al. (2018) which were observed by JCMT with FWHM at 350 GHz with grid spacing of 10″, and the [C i] data is obtained from Jiao et al. (2019) which was observed by Herschel with FWHM and at 492 GHz (the rest frequency of [C i] (1–0)) and 809 GHz (the rest frequency of [C i] (2–1), Makiwa et al., 2013), respectively. In Supplementary Figure S1, we present the distribution of [C i] (1–0) integrated intensities with detections (signal-to-noise ratio of SNR ) of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) shown as red and blue dashed squares. We further use the luminosity ratios of , , and R[CI] results from Jiao et al. (2019) with CO (1–0) (Kuno et al., 2007; Salak et al., 2013) observed using Nobeyama 45-m telescope. The fluxes of [C i] lines in Jiao et al. (2019) were determined by fitting the observed line profiles with the instrumental Sinc function after subtracting a fifth-order polynomial fit of the continuum emission (see details in Lu et al. 2017; Jiao et al. 2019). Then flux was converted to luminosity following Papadopoulos et al. (2012). The CO (1–0) images were smoothed to match both [C i] maps using convolution kernels generated by comparing the Nobeyama 45-m profile with the Herschel Gaussian profile of FWHM and (), respectively. Jiao et al. (2019) calculated the R[CI] directly for each pixel without beam matching since the FWHMs of [C i] (1–0) and [C i] (2–1) are similar.Column (1) and (2): the sub-samples and galaxy names. Tan18 refers to Tan et al. (2018), Zhang14 refers to Zhang et al. (2014), and Imanishi18 refers to . Columns (3)–(5) are the coordinate and velocity adopted from NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). Columns (6) and (7): the FWHM of the beam size for HCN (4–3) observations in arcseconds and physical scale of kiloparsec, respectively. 3 × 3 in parentheses of column (6) represents the Gaussian fits region of the spatially extended galaxy IRAS 04315-0840. The values in column (7) with “∼″ means geometric mean physical scales for synthesized beams of ALMA observations. Column (8): galaxy types. The type of “Cp″ in sub-sample of Imanishi18 refers to starburst + AGN composities.
The luminosities of and are adopted from Tan et al. (2018). Briefly, the luminosities of HCN (4–3) and HCN (4–3) were estimated by subtracting a first-order baseline and then integrating the velocity range which was determined based on CO(1–0) data using a Gaussian fitting. We also take the total infrared (3–1,100 μm) luminosities LIR from Tan et al. (2018) which were estimated with the prescription of : LIR = ∑ciνLν(i)L⊙ using calibrated IR image data including Spitzer MIPS 24 μm and Herschel 70 μm, 100 μm and 160 μm from the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive (IRSA), where ci is the calibration coefficient as shown in Table 3 of , and νLν(i) is the luminosity in a given band i in unit of L⊙. The FWHM of the MIPS 24 μm is 6″1, and the Herschel instrument provides maps with FWHMs of ∼ 5.6″, 6.8″, and 10.7″at 70 μm, 100 μm, and 160 μm2, respectively. The IR images are smoothed to match the JCMT line observations with convolution kernels generated by comparing the Spitzer and Herschel profiles with Gaussian profile of FWHM 14″(). Same as Tan et al. (2018), the total uncertainties of LIR comprise the flux uncertainty and the uncertainty from combined luminosities ( for galaxies with more than four IR bands available and for less than four IR bands, ).
In MALATANG-I observations, M 83 was detected in HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions at only the central position (Tan et al., 2018). However, more detections are found for M 83 by combining the MALATANG-I and MALATANG-II data. In this work, we use the combined data for M 83. The HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) detections of M 83 are also shown in Supplementary Figure S1.
2.2 Data reduction for Zhang14 subsample
The HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions in the subsample of Zhang14 from Zhang et al. (2014) are mostly observed by the APEX in the central region with FWHM , and collected from literature with FWHM . While the IR luminosity of the entire galaxy LTIR is adopted from Sanders et al. (2003). In order to estimate the LTIR within the same beam size as HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3), Zhang et al. (2014) used Herschel PACS 100 μm or 70 μm (when 100 μm is not available) images to perform aperture photometry both with the submillimeter beam size and the whole galaxy. The beam size correction IR luminosity is estimated as LIR = LTIR × RSD × Caper (see the details in Zhang et al., 2014), where RSD is the ratio of flux densities within the beam size of the HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions to that measured in the whole galaxy, and Caper is the aperture correction factor for the beam size. The total uncertainty estimated for LIR is 20%. We note that the majority of galaxies have a RSD = 1, which means that their corresponding beam size of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) can cover the entire galaxy.
The majority of [C i] lines used in this study are taken from Lu et al. (2017), and the corresponding galaxy is point-like with respect to the Herschel beam at [C i] (2–1) rest frequency, except for NGC 4945 and IC 342 which are obtained from . The CO (1–0) are adopted from Jiao et al. (2017) with beam size greater than that of [C i] (2–1). Specifically, the [C i] (1–0) of Galaxy NGC 4418 was flagged as quality Q = 4 (3 ≤ SNR ) in Lu et al. (2017), which means that the [C i] (1–0) is only a possible line identification with the inferred line velocity being just short of satisfying their velocity criterion. Considering the low SNR of NGC 4418, we define the galaxy as non-detection with 3σ as upper limit. Table 2 lists the targets of subsample Zhang14 with distance, intensities, luminosities, and correction factors of RSD, Caper. We adopt 3σ upper limits for non-detections.
TABLE 2
| Galaxy | Dis (Mpc) | LIR (1010L⊙) | RSD | Caper | I[CI](1–0) | I[CI](2–1) | ICO(1–0) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (106 K km s−1 pc2) | (Jy km s−1) | ||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
| IC 1,623 | 82.4 | 49.0 | <62 | 62 ± 15 | 0.65 | 1.29 | 1,227.0 ± 88.8 | 1,160.6 ± 18.5 | 557.0 ± 111.9 |
| NGC 3,256 | 44.3 | 57.5 | 22 ± 4 | 56 ± 4 | 0.34 | 1.29 | 4,064.5 ± 177.3 | 4,996.6 ± 43.8 | 1,222.8 ± 366.9 |
| NGC 4,418 | 29.5 | 9.33 | 26.8 ± 2.0 | 8.9 ± 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | <752.0 | 470.0 ± 50.7 | 137.9 ± 24.5 |
| IRAS 13120–5,453 | 128.3 | 178 | 330 ± 30 | 265 ± 30 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1,349.6 ± 149.0 | 1,537.9 ± 32.3 | … |
| NGC 6240 | 107 | 70.8 | 189 ± 30 | 260 ± 20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1,598.3 ± 106.2 | 3,515.1 ± 104.5 | 290.9 ± 44.3 |
| IRAS 17578–0400 | 61.1 | 24.5 | 57.0 ± 10 | <34 | 1.0 | 1.0 | <1,266.1 | 676.1 ± 55.8 | … |
| IRAS 18293–3413 | 77.4 | 64.6 | <55 | 116 ± 20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2,591.8 ± 138.3 | 2,378.2 ± 28.4 | 686.1 ± 205.8 |
| NGC 7469 | 71.6 | 46.8 | <30 | 37 ± 10 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1,219.7 ± 79.2 | 1,464.1 ± 17.6 | 298.0 ± 89.4 |
| NGC 7552 | 19.5 | 8.91 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 0.59 | 1.29 | 3,178.2 ± 176.4 | 3,943.9 ± 40.8 | 652.0 ± 195.6 |
| NGC 7771 | 63.0 | 26.9 | <36 | <36 | 0.55 | 1.29 | 1,509.3 ± 105.5 | 1,247.3 ± 21.6 | 370.3 ± 84.2 |
| Mrk 331 | 80.9 | 33.9 | 60 ± 13 | <40 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 860.1 ± 64.4 | 877.7 ± 14.9 | 371.2 ± 86.2 |
| Arp 220 | 79.9 | 162.2 | 950 ± 190 | 170 ± 40 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1,820.8 ± 297.2 | 1,737.7 ± 64.2 | 445.3 ± 85.3 |
| Mrk 231 | 180.8 | 340 | 550 ± 110 | 188 ± 23 | 1.0 | 1.0 | <404.7 | 446.7 ± 17.8 | 103.6 ± 37.4 |
| NGC 4945 | 3.8 | 2.82 | 3.6 ± 0.05 | 4.5 ± 0.05 | 0.40 | 1.29 | 13,237.9 | 34,333.9 | … |
| IC 342 | 3.9 | 1.08 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | … | 0.05 | 1.33 | 5,566.1 ± 554.1 | 8,124.8 ± 299.5 | … |
The galaxy in Zhang14.
2.3 Data reduction for Imanishi18 subsample
The HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) emissions of subsample Imanishi18 are taken from Table 15 in that were observed with ALMA, and the corresponding LIR values are also adopted from . In this sample of galaxies, the ALMA measurements mostly cover the emissions of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3). This is because ULIRGs are typically dominated by nuclear compact energy sources with ≲500 pc (Soifer et al., 2000), and the dense gas tracers mostly come from compact nuclear regions. The luminosities of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) were measured using Gaussian fits of the spectra within the beam size. However, for the spatially extended galaxy IRAS 04315–1808, the luminosity was estimated from Gaussian fits (3″× 3″) of the spatially integrated spectra. The CO (1–0) and [C i] intensities are collected from literature as shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3
| Galaxy | Redshift | log LIR (L⊙) | ICO(1–0) (Jy km s−1) | Ref_CO | I[CI](1–0) | I[CI](2–1) | Ref_CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (107 K km s−1 pc2) | (Jy km s−1) | ||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
| IRAS 08572 + 3915 | 0.0580 | 12.1 | 5.1 ± 0.5 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 3.2 | So97 | <1,140 | <179 | Ka16 |
| IRAS 19254–7245 | 0.0617 | 12.1 | 18 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 64.8 ± 13.0a | Mi90 | … | 292 ± 54 | Ka16 |
| IRAS 22491–1808 | 0.0776 | 12.2 | 21 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 31.5 ± 6.3b | Sa91 | … | <177 | Ka16 |
| IRAS 04315–0840 | 0.0160 | 11.7 | 0.34 ± 0.10 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 247.7 ± 37.8 | Ji17 | <799.1 | 897.8 ± 24.1 | Lu17 |
| IRAS 13451 + 1232 | 0.1215 | 12.3 | 12 ± 2 | 22 ± 2 | 20 ± 6 | DC11 | … | 172.2 | Fa16 |
ALMA sample in Imanishi.
Particularly, with unprecedented high resolution ALMA observation, NGC 7469 is regarded as an AGN position of A, and three bright knots in the starburst ring as B, C, and D (see the details in ). In Table 4, we present the ratio (adopted from Table 3 from ) that both emissions were extracted within a single synthesized beam with 150 pc resolution for the four positions. The CO (1–0) and [C i] (1–0) luminosities are adopted from Table 7 from Izumi et al. (2020) within pc aperture. In the following analysis, we directly use , [C i] (1–0), and CO (1–0) values of NGC 7469 without correction since their beam sizes are similar to each other.
TABLE 4
| Galaxy | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (106 K km s−1 pc2) | |||
| NGC 7469_A | 1.11 ± 0.06 | 23.2 ± 1.1 | 21.4 ± 0.4 |
| NGC 7469_B | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 19.0 ± 0.3 | 4.7 ± 0.1 |
| NGC 7469_C | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 15.3 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.1 |
| NGC 7469_D | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 20.9 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.1 |
NGC 7469.
The three subsample datasets are obtained from diverse telescope observations with distinct beam sizes, particularly for HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) observations. In Table 1, we list the FWHM of HCN (4–3) for each galaxy (the FWHMs of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) are similar). The [C i] observations for all galaxies were obtained with Herschel, except for NGC 7469 which was observed with ALMA. Notablely, the line ratios of IR-HCN/HCO+ and , as well as [C i]-CO ratios are calculated at the same resolutions for the Tan18 sample. For the Zhang14 and Imanishi18 samples, most galaxies are point sources with respect to the corresponding FWHM. Therefore, the observed HCN (4–3), HCO+ (4–3), [C i], and CO emissions represent the average properties of the galaxies. Furthermore, aperture corrections are applied for a few extended sources in Zhang14, and spatial Gaussian fits are used for spatially resolved galaxy of IRAS 04315–1808 in the Imanishi18 sample. Meanwhile, NGC 7469 use similar resolutions of HCN (4–3), HCN (4–3), [C i] and CO data. We also test the influence of beam size on line ratios for spatially resolved sample Tan18 and NGC 7469, and find that the correlations of beam size in kpc scale with and are −0.17 and 0.14 (these two line ratios and are what we mainly discuss in next section), respectively. The correlation between beam size and is 0.39, which becomes 0.29 after removing the center point of NGC 1068. This center point could be associated with the significantly high ratios that are correlated with the UV/X-ray illumination by AGN (; Viti et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2018). Consequently, the impact of varying beam sizes on the overall sample is minimal.
Columns 2 to 7 are adopted from Zhang et al. (2014). RSD is the ratio of flux densities within the beam size of HCN (4–3) to that measured in the whole galaxy, and Caper is the aperture correction factor for the beam size (see the details in Zhang et al., 2014). [C i] fluxes in columns 8 and 9 are adopted from Lu et al. (2017), except for NGC 4945 and IC 342 which obtained from . Column 10 is the CO (1–0) fluxes adopted from Jiao et al. (2017). Columns 2 and 3 are the redshift and infrared luminosities adopted from , column 4 and 5 are the HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) luminosities which are adopted from Table 15 in . Columns 6 and 7 are CO (1–0) intensities and references: So97—Solomon et al. (1997), Mi90—Mirabel et al. (1990), Sa91—Sanders et al. (1991), Ji17—Jiao et al. (2017), DC11—. Columns 8, 9, and 10 are [C i] intensities and references: Ka16—Kamenetzky et al. (2016), Lu17—Lu et al. (2017), Fa16—. a The CO (1–0) data is observed with SEST, and is converted from K km s−1 to Jy km s−1 with conversion factor Sv/T (Jy/K) = 27.b The CO (1–0) data is observed with 12m NRAO, and is converted from K km s−1 to Jy km s−1 with conversion factor Sv/T (Jy/K) = 35.The A, B, C, and D of NGC 7469 stand for the AGN position and three bright knots in the starburst ring (see details in ). The is adopted from , and CO (1–0) and [C i] (1–0) luminosities are adopted from Izumi et al. (2020).
2.4 WISE data
We also use the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) 3.4 μm (W1) and 4.6 μm (W2) emissions and uncertainties for each galaxy from the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive. For the samples of Tan18 and Zhang14, we firstly estimate the background for each galaxy using SExtractor (Source-Extractor; ) program with the corresponding uncertainty maps as inputs, and then subtract its estimated background. The background-subtracted image of each galaxy is smoothed to its corresponding HCN (4–3) resolution (JCMT or APEX) with convolution kernels generated by comparing the WISE profiles with JCMT/APEX Gaussian profile of FWHM 14″/18″(). For galaxies in sample of Imanish18 with high resolutions (observed with ALMA with FWHM mostly smaller than 1″at HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3)), we directly use its profile-fit photometry magnitude from “WISE All-Sky Source Catalog” at IPAC.
The WISE images are originally in units of digital numbers (DN), and we convert them to luminosity units of L⊙ with method shown in Supplementary Material. Similar to Tan et al. (2018), in order to convert the units from L⊙ into L⊙ beam−1, we scale the image by a factor of 1.133 × (FWHM/pixel size)2, where FWHM = 14″for JCMT and 18″for APEX, pixel size is the length of a pixel in arcseconds. As shown in Supplementary Material, the WISE uncertainties include the zero-point magnitude uncertainty, and the instrumental uncertainty measured with WISE uncertainty maps.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Correlations between SFEdense with [C i]-CO luminosity ratios
The MALATANG HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) mappings do not satisfy Nyquist sampling theorem with grid spacing of 10″for the JCMT FWHM of at 350 GHz, so we directly use the luminosity ratios of and under JCMT scale from Tan et al. (2018), and compare them with [C i]-CO ratios under Herschel scales. As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, for pixels which have more than one JCMT detection points, we use their mean values of , or as its final values, respectively.
Figure 1 shows the correlations between with , , and R[CI] for three subsamples combined. The scatter plots show that almost has no correlation with , while correlates moderately with both and R[CI]. Besides, for Herschel pixel points where multiple MALATANG sample detections were made, we also use the original values of , and present the correlations of with [C i]-CO luminosity ratios in panel A of Supplementary Figure S2 for all subsamples combined in Supplementary Material. Supplementary Figure S2, 1 show that using the original values of the MALATANG sample produces similar results to the mean values of the sample.
FIGURE 1
We further use Monte Carlo method to estimate the Spearman’s rank correlation with those limits. For the upper limits (as Uupper), we generate 10,000 uniformly distributed random numbers ranging from 0 to Uupper. And for the lower limits (as Ulower), the 10,000 random numbers are uniformly distributed over Ulower to 103Ulower. We then calculate the correlation coefficient 10,000 times using the detection points and the generated random numbers for the limits, and define the average r and p as the final results. As shown in Table 5, the results obtained with and without limits are similar. Moreover, moderately correlates with and R[CI], while it has no significant correlation with .
TABLE 5
| Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | r | p | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
| 0.31 | 0.05 | 0.67 | 1.33 × 10−7 | 0.70 | 7.56 × 10−8 | |
| 0.39 | 7.46 × 10−3 | 0.65 | 4.09 × 10−7 | 0.51 | 1.11 × 10−4 | |
| 0.53 | 2.81 × 10−4 | 0.78 | 3.46 × 10−11 | 0.54 | 1.24 × 10−4 | |
| 0.50 | 1.26 × 10−3 | 0.72 | 5.92 × 10−8 | 0.51 | 1.16 × 10−4 | |
| 0.34 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.22 | −0.29 | 0.18 | |
| 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.80 | |
The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and significance.
We further plot the against , , and R[CI] for three subsamples together using mean values of MALATANG points in Figure 2, and list the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients in Table 5. The correlation coefficients with both lower and upper limits are also listed in Table 5. We also present the results of the total sample with original values of MALATANG detections in panel B of Supplementary Figure S2, respectively. The has moderate correlation with all three line luminosity ratios when analyzing the mean values of MALATANG points. However, when considering the total sample with original values, the correlations between and both and R[CI] are slightly stronger than the correlation between and , as shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Columns (2)−(7): The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r) and the possibility of no correlation (p) without (first row) and with (second row) non-detection points.
FIGURE 2

Comparison of the luminosity ratios of with the line luminosity ratios of (A), (B), and (C), respectively. The symbols are same as in Figure 1.
3.2 The
In Figure 3, we present the correlation between and , , and R[CI] for three subsamples. These correlations are calculated using the mean values of the MALATANG subsample for points which have more than one JCMT detections in Herschel pixel. The four regions of NGC 7469 resolved with ALMA (AGN position A, and three bright starburst knots B, C, D) are also included. Table 5 gives the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients for samples together without and with considering the limits. We also present these correlations for total samples using the original values of MALATANG detections in Supplementary Figure S2. There is no obvious correlation between and , , or R[CI], while the in some galaxies (e.g., NGC 1068, few galaxies in Zhang14) shows slightly higher than the other galaxies.
FIGURE 3

Comparison of the line luminosity ratios of with that of (A), (B), and (C), respectively. We further add galaxy NGC 7469 adopted from
The ratio has been proposed as an indicator of AGN activity due to higher observed in galaxies hosting AGN (e.g., Krips et al., 2008; Izumi et al., 2013;
FIGURE 4

(A) boxes show the medians (colored lines in the boxes), the interquartile ranges (colored boxes), and the full range up to 1.5× the interquartile range (IQR; colored horizontal lines) of for Tan18 sample galaxies, star-forming and AGN systems of whole system. Fliers (points with value IQR) are plotted with colored circles, and the central value for Tan18 galaxies are shown as black asterisks. Upper and lower limits are not included in the box plot. (B) The plots against color of W1 - W2 for the sample together.
Using the WISE surveys in COSMOS field, Stern et al. (2012) present a simple mid-infrared color criterion of W1 − W2 ≥ 0.8 for W2 15.05 mag which identifies a reliable and complete AGN sample. In order to test the with AGNs, we present the ratios with AGN diagnostic of W1 − W2 colors in panel B of Figure 4. All of the W2 in our sample is smaller than the criterion of 15.05 mag. The high ratios are mostly found in the region where W1 − W2 is greater than 0.8 mag. However, in this region, the ratios vary widely, ranging from a minimum of 0.5, which is similar to the values in the region where W1 − W2 is less than 0.8 mag for star-forming points, to a maximum of 5.5, which is significantly higher than most star-forming regions. Meanwhile, most of the values in the region of W1 − W2 0.8 mag are comparable with those values in the region of W1 − W2 ≥ 0.8 mag. This is consistent with panel A of Figure 4, and both indicate that AGN may enhance the ratio of in some systems, while most values of are similar to those in SF systems. Therefore, the reliability of using the ratio as an AGN indicator may be compromised, as discussed in the following.
3.3 Discussion
3.3.1 The relationship between SFEdense and [C i]-CO ratios
The line ratio R[CI] can be used to determine directly the excitation temperature by adopting the equation Tex = 38.8 K/ln[2.11/R[CI]] in optically thin limit (Stutzki et al., 1997). The excitation temperatures are typically in the range of 20–30 K for our sample, which is close to the excitation energy of [C i] (1–0) (24 K) but significantly lower than that of [C i] (2–1) (63 K). Tan et al. (2018) present the ratios of and as a function of color f70/f100 μm for MALATANG galaxies NGC 253, IC 342, and NGC 6946, and find both and correlate moderate and positive with f70/f100 μm. In the study of Jiao et al. (2017); Jiao et al. (2019), they investigate the dependence of , and R[CI] on the color f60/f100μm, and find non-correlation, a weak correlation, and a modest correlation, respectively. The better correlations involving the [C i] (2–1) line ratios with both and found in Figure 1, S2 are consistence with the results in Tan et al. (2018).
According to Jiao et al. (2019), the / and R[CI] ratios exhibit a centrally peaked distribution in starburst galaxies. Krips et al. (2016) and Salak et al. (2019) found that the / ratio tends to be higher in the bright centers of starburst galaxies NGC 253 and NGC 1808, as well as in LIRG IRAS F18293-3413 (Saito et al., 2020), based on well-resolved datasets observed with ALMA. These results indicate that the strong radiation fields in this active star formation regions with high and can enhance carbon emissions, which is agree with our results in Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S2.
However, we note that the scatters of and in resolved galaxies of Tan18 are larger than those in global galaxies of the Zhang14 and Imanishi18 samples. When only considering the Tan18 sample, the correlations between and , and R[CI] are found to be 0.25, 0.66, and 0.78, respectively. Similarly, the correlations between and , and R[CI] are 0.46, 0.79, and 0.80 for Tan18 galaxies. However, in the Zhang14 and Imanishi18 samples, both and show no significant correlations with the [C i]-CO and R[CI] ratios, with correlation coefficients less than 0.26, except for the relationship between and R[CI]. The correlation coefficient for this relationship is −0.41, which is primarily influenced by galaxies NGC 6240 and NGC 4945, in which gas heating is likely dominated by shocks (Wang et al., 2004; Meijerink et al., 2012;
The higher correlations observed in resolved samples indicate that and may be more sensitive to [C i]-CO and R[CI] ratios in normal SF galaxies than in AGNs, as the Tan18 sample is predominantly composed of SF galaxies, while Zhang14 and Imanishi18 samples are mostly AGNs. This is further supported by the relatively smaller dispersions of and in the AGN galaxy NGC 1068 compared to other SF galaxies in Tan18. Additionally, the and values are similar to those observed in the Zhang14 and Imanishi18. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the differences in correlations are due to variations in physical properties between global and resolved regions. Furthermore, variations in and across different regions can be smoothed out when calculating global averages. It should also be noted that the regions detected in HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) do not entirely overlap with those observed in [C i] observations, which could potentially introduce some uncertainty to the results.
3.3.2 The variation of ratio
Izumi et al. (2013),
The ratios in our sample do not show a significant trend between AGN and star-forming galaxies, which is not consistent with the aforementioned results using high resolutions. This inconsistency may be due to the following reasons: (1) The influence of resolution on this line ratio can not be ignored. The effect of AGN can be contaminated and even smoothed out from global average environment when the resolution is not good enough to distinguish AGN from the surrounding SF region. (2) The variation of the line ratio is complex, e.g., it is strongly time-dependent (Meijerink et al., 2013), and easily affected by gas temperature (Viti et al., 2014), molecular chemistry (Izumi et al., 2013; Martín et al., 2015), complicaed opacity (Meier and Turner, 2012), IR pumping by UV/X-ray heated dust (
The ratio of in some SF galaxies, such as NGC 253 and M 83, is comparable to the ratio in AGNs. The higher value observed in NGC 253 may be due to its younger starburst age compared to M 82 (Izumi et al., 2016), which has significantly lower ratios due to the increased fractional abundance of HCO+ resulting from high ionization effects from cosmic rays in frequent supernovae explosions (Meijerink et al., 2011). However, in NGC 253, the molecular gas heating is likely dominated by shocks (Martín et al., 2006) rather than photodissociation and/or supernovae in M 82. Large velocity gradient (LVG) models with , Tkin=80 K, and X(HCN) ∼ 5X(HCO+) abundance ratios have been reported for NGC 253 (Meier et al., 2015). The HCN and HCO+ lines are optically thick and subthermally excited in NGC 253 (Knudsen et al., 2007; Meier et al., 2015), and its dense gas excitations are higher than M 82 and even AGN galaxies of NGC 6240, Mrk 231 via HCN spectral energy distributions (SEDs, Knudsen et al., 2007). Nguyen et al. (1992) reported high ratios in M 83, which is even higher than that in NGC 1068.
Using the IRAM 30 m observations of a sample of 58 local luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies from the Great Observatories All-sky LIRG Survey, Privon et al. (2015) found that the ratio of is higher in AGN-dominated systems compared to composite and starburst-dominated systems. However, the ratios in some composite and starburst systems are comparable to those of AGNs. Therefore, they concluded that enhancement of HCN emission is not uniquely associated with AGNs, which is consistent with our finding in Figure 4. Li et al. (2021) complied a sample with more than 100 galaxies including 70 local galaxies observed with IRAM and samples from
4 Summary
In this paper, we select a sample of 26 galaxies which both have dense gas observations of HCN (4–3) and HCO+ (4–3) from Tan et al. (2018); Zhang et al. (2014);
We plot against , , or R[CI] ratios, and find no obvious correlations for all of them. We present the for AGN and SF galaxies in Tan18, and also plot the with AGN diagnostic of W1 − W2 colors for the total samples. Both show that higher ratios are predominantly found in AGN candidates, while majority of the values in SF galaxies are comparable to those in AGNs, which raises the possibility that may not be a reliable indicator for distinguishing AGN from SF galaxies.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
QJ and YuG designed the study, and QJ was the main author of the article. QT and YaG made significant contributions and edits to the text. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Nos. 12003070 and 12033004). Research Funding of Wuhan Polytechnic University NO. 2022RZ035. Scientific Research Fund of Dezhou University, 3012304024.
Acknowledgments
This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, and NEOWISE, which is a project of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology. WISE and NEOWISE are funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1246978/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Alaghband-ZadehS.ChapmanS.SwinbankA.SmailI.DanielsonA.DecarliR.et al (2013). Using [c i] to probe the interstellar medium in z 2.5 sub-millimeter galaxies. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.435, 1493–1510. 10.1093/mnras/stt1390
2
AnianoG.DraineB. T.GordonK.SandstromK. (2011). Common-resolution convolution kernels for space-and ground-based telescopes. Publ. Astronomical Soc. Pac.123, 1218–1236. 10.1086/662219
3
BaanW. A.HenkelC.LoenenA. F.BaudryA.WiklindT. (2008). Dense gas in luminous infrared galaxies. A&A477, 747–762. 10.1051/0004-6361:20077203
4
BertinE.ArnoutsS. (1996). Sextractor: software for source extraction. Astronomy astrophysics Suppl. Ser.117, 393–404. 10.1051/aas:1996164
5
BétherminM.GreveT.De BreuckC.VieiraJ.AravenaM.ChapmanS.et al (2018). Dense-gas tracers and carbon isotopes in five 2.5< z< 4 lensed dusty star-forming galaxies from the spt smg sample. Astronomy Astrophysics620, A115. 10.1051/0004-6361/201833081
6
BigielF.LeroyA. K.Jiménez-DonaireM. J.PetyJ.UseroA.CormierD.et al (2016). The EMPIRE survey: systematic variations in the dense gas fraction and star formation efficiency from full-disk mapping of M51. Astrophysical J. Lett.822, L26. 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/l26
7
BigielF.LeroyA.WalterF.BrinksE.de BlokW. J. G.MadoreB.et al (2008). The star formation law in nearby galaxies on sub-kpc scales. Astronomical J.136, 2846–2871. 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846
8
BisbasT. G.PapadopoulosP. P.VitiS. (2015). Effective destruction of co by cosmic rays: implications for tracing h2 gas in the universe. Astrophysical J.803, 37. 10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/37
9
BisbasT. G.Van DishoeckE. F.PapadopoulosP. P.SzűcsL.BialyS.ZhangZ.-Y. (2017). Cosmic-ray induced destruction of co in star-forming galaxies. Astrophysical J.839, 90. 10.3847/1538-4357/aa696d
10
BolattoA. D.WolfireM.LeroyA. K. (2013). The co-to-h2 conversion factor. Annu. Rev. Astronomy Astrophysics51, 207–268. 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944
11
BoogaardL. A.van der WerfP.WeissA.PoppingG.DecarliR.WalterF.et al (2020). The alma spectroscopic survey in the hubble ultra deep field: co excitation and atomic carbon in star-forming galaxies at z= 1–3. Astrophysical J.902, 109. 10.3847/1538-4357/abb82f
12
ChenH.BraineJ.GaoY.KodaJ.GuQ. (2017). Dense gas in the outer spiral arm of m51. Astrophysical J.836, 101. 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/101
13
ChenH.GaoY.BraineJ.GuQ. (2015). Spatially resolved dense molecular gas and star formation rate in M51. Astrophysical J.810, 140–149. 10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/140
14
CostagliolaF.AaltoS.RodriguezM.MullerS.SpoonH.MartínS.et al (2011). Molecules as tracers of galaxy evolution: an EMIR survey: I. Presentation of the data and first results⋆. Astronomy Astrophysics528, A30. 10.1051/0004-6361/201015628
15
DaddiE.ElbazD.WalterF.BournaudF.SalmiF.CarilliC.et al (2010). Different star formation laws for disks versus starbursts at low and high redshifts. Astrophysical J. Lett.714, L118–L122. 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/l118
16
DasyraK.CombesF. (2011). Turbulent and fast motions of h2 gas in active galactic nuclei. Astronomy Astrophysics533, L10. 10.1051/0004-6361/201117730
17
DunneL.MaddoxS.PapadopoulosP.IvisonR.GomezH. (2022). Dust, co, and [c i]: cross-calibration of molecular gas mass tracers in metal-rich galaxies across cosmic time. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.517, 962–999. 10.1093/mnras/stac2098
18
EvansN. J.HeidermanA.VutisalchavakulN.et al (2014). Star formation relations in nearby molecular clouds. Astrophysical J.782, 114. 10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/114
19
Fernández-OntiverosJ. A.SpinoglioL.Pereira-SantaellaM.MalkanM. A.AndreaniP.DasyraK. M. (2016). Far-infrared line spectra of active galaxies from the herschel/pacs spectrometer: the complete database. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.226, 19. 10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/19
20
GachesB. A.OffnerS. S.BisbasT. G. (2019). The astrochemical impact of cosmic rays in protoclusters. ii. ci-to-h2 and co-to-h2 conversion factors. Astrophysical J.883, 190. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c5c
21
GalametzM.KennicuttR.CalzettiD.AnianoG.DraineB. T.BoquienM.et al (2013). Calibration of the total infrared luminosity of nearby galaxies from spitzer and herschel bands. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.431, 1956–1986. 10.1093/mnras/stt313
22
GaoY.CarilliC. L.SolomonP. M.BoutP. A. V. (2007). Hcn observations of dense star-forming gas in high-redshift galaxies. Astrophysical J. Lett.660, L93–L96. 10.1086/518244
23
GaoY.SolomonP. M. (2004a). HCN survey of normal spiral, infrared-luminous, and ultraluminous galaxies. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.152, 63–80. 10.1086/383003
24
GaoY.SolomonP. M. (2004b). The star formation rate and dense molecular gas in galaxies. Astrophysical J.606, 271–290. 10.1086/382999
25
García-BurilloS.CombesF.UseroA.AaltoS.KripsM.VitiS.et al (2014). Molecular line emission in ngc 1068 imaged with alma-i. an agn-driven outflow in the dense molecular gas. Astronomy Astrophysics567, A125. 10.1051/0004-6361/201423843
26
García-BurilloS.UseroA.Alonso-HerreroA.Graciá-CarpioJ.Pereira-SantaellaM.ColinaL.et al (2012). Star-formation laws in luminous infrared galaxies: new observational constraints on models⋆. Astronomy Astrophysics539, A8. 10.1051/0004-6361/201117838
27
GloverS. C.ClarkP. C. (2016). Is atomic carbon a good tracer of molecular gas in metal-poor galaxies?Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.456, 3596–3609. 10.1093/mnras/stv2863
28
GloverS. C.ClarkP. C.MicicM.MolinaF. (2015). Modelling [c i] emission from turbulent molecular clouds. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.448, 1607–1627. 10.1093/mnras/stu2699
29
Graciá-CarpioJ.García-BurilloS.PlanesasP.ColinaL. (2006). Is hcn a true tracer of dense molecular gas in luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies?Astrophysical J.640, L135–L138. 10.1086/503361
30
Graciá-CarpioJ.García-BurilloS.PlanesasP.FuenteA.UseroA. (2008). Evidence of enhanced star formation efficiency in luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astronomy Astrophysics479, 703–717. 10.1051/0004-6361:20078223
31
HenkelC.MühleS.BendoG.JózsaG.GongY.VitiS.et al (2018). Molecular line emission in ngc 4945, imaged with alma. Astronomy Astrophysics615, A155. 10.1051/0004-6361/201732174
32
IkedaM.MaezawaH.ItoT.SaitoG.SekimotoY.YamamotoS.et al (1999). Large-scale mapping observations of the C [CSC]i[/CSC] ([TSUP]3[/TSUP] [ital]P[/ITAL] [TINF]1[/TINF]–[TSUP]3[/TSUP] [ital]P[/ITAL] [TINF]0[/TINF]) and CO ([ITAL]J[/ITAL] = 3–2) lines toward the orion A molecular cloud. Astrophysical J.527, L59–L62. 10.1086/312395
33
IkedaM.OkaT.TatematsuK.SekimotoY.YamamotoS. (2002). The distribution of atomic carbon in the orion giant molecular cloud 1. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.139, 467–485. 10.1086/338761
34
ImanishiM.NakanishiK.IzumiT. (2018). Alma multiple-transition observations of high-density molecular tracers in ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astrophysical J.856, 143. 10.3847/1538-4357/aab42f
35
IsraelF.RosenbergM.van der WerfP. (2015). Neutral carbon and co in 76 (u) lirgs and starburst galaxy centers-a method to determine molecular gas properties in luminous galaxies. Astronomy Astrophysics578, A95. 10.1051/0004-6361/201425175
36
IzumiT.KohnoK.AaltoS.DoiA.EspadaD.FathiK.et al (2015). Alma observations of the submillimeter dense molecular gas tracers in the luminous type-1 active nucleus of ngc 7469. Astrophysical J.811, 39. 10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/39
37
IzumiT.KohnoK.AaltoS.EspadaD.FathiK.HaradaN.et al (2016). Submillimeter-hcn diagram for energy diagnostics in the centers of galaxies. Astrophysical J.818, 42. 10.3847/0004-637x/818/1/42
38
IzumiT.KohnoK.MartínS.EspadaD.HaradaN.MatsushitaS.et al (2013). Submillimeter ALMA observations of the dense gas in the low-luminosity type-1 active nucleus of NGC1097. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. Nihon. Tenmon. Gakkai.65, 100. 10.1093/pasj/65.5.100
39
IzumiT.NguyenD. D.ImanishiM.KawamuroT.BabaS.NakanoS.et al (2020). Alma observations of multiple co and c lines toward the active galactic nucleus of ngc 7469: an x-ray-dominated region caught in the act. Astrophysical J.898, 75. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9cb1
40
JiangX.-J.GreveT. R.GaoY.ZhangZ.-Y.TanQ.de GrijsR.et al (2020). The MALATANG survey: dense gas and star formation from high-transition HCN and HCO+ maps of NGC 253. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.494, 1276–1296. 10.1093/mnras/staa794
41
JiaoQ.ZhaoY.LuN.GaoY.SalakD.ZhuM.et al (2019). Resolved neutral carbon emission in nearby galaxies:[c i] lines as total molecular gas tracers. Astrophysical J.880, 133. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29ed
42
JiaoQ.ZhaoY.ZhuM.LuN.GaoY.ZhangZ.-Y. (2017). Neutral carbon emission in luminous infrared galaxies: the [c i] lines as total molecular gas tracers. Astrophysical J. Lett.840, L18. 10.3847/2041-8213/aa6f0f
43
Jiménez-DonaireM. J.BigielF.LeroyA.UseroA.CormierD.PuschnigJ.et al (2019). Empire: the iram 30 m dense gas survey of nearby galaxies. Astrophysical J.880, 127. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b95
44
KamenetzkyJ.RangwalaN.GlennJ.MaloneyP.ConleyA. (2016). Relations with co rotational ladders of galaxies across the herschel spire archive. Astrophysical J.829, 93. 10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/93
45
KennicuttJ. R. C.EvansN. J. (2012). Star formation in the milky way and nearby galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astronomy Astrophysics50, 531–608. 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610
46
KennicuttR. C. J. (1998). The global schmidt law in star-forming galaxies. Astrophysical J.498, 541–552. 10.1086/305588
47
KnudsenK.WalterF.WeissA.BolattoA.RiechersD.MentenK. (2007). New insights on the dense molecular gas in ngc 253 as traced by hcn and hco+. Astrophysical J.666, 156–164. 10.1086/519761
48
KripsM.MartínS.SakamotoK.AaltoS.BisbasT.BolattoA.et al (2016). Aca [ci] observations of the starburst galaxy ngc 253. Astronomy Astrophysics592, L3. 10.1051/0004-6361/201628882
49
KripsM.NeriR.García-BurilloS.MartínS.CombesF.Graciá-CarpioJ.et al (2008). A multi-transition hcn and hco+ study of 12 nearby active galaxies: active galactic nucleus versus starburst environments. Astrophysical J.677, 262–275. 10.1086/527367
50
KunoN.SatoN.NakanishiH.HirotaA.TosakiT.ShioyaY.et al (2007). Nobeyama co atlas of nearby spiral galaxies: distribution of molecular gas in barred and nonbarred spiral galaxies. Publ. Astronomical Soc. Jpn.59, 117–166. 10.1093/pasj/59.1.117
51
LadaC. J.ForbrichJ.LombardiM.AlvesJ. F. (2012). Star formation rates in molecular clouds and the nature of the extragalactic scaling relations. Astrophysical J.745, 190. 10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/190
52
LadaC. J.LombardiM.AlvesJ. F. (2010). On the star formation rates in molecular clouds. Astrophysical J.724, 687–693. 10.1088/0004-637x/724/1/687
53
LeeM. M.TanakaI.IonoD.KawabeR.KodamaT.KohnoK.et al (2021). Revisited cold gas content with atomic carbon [c i] in z= 2.5 protocluster galaxies. Astrophysical J.909, 181. 10.3847/1538-4357/abdbb5
54
LiF.WangJ.FangM.TanQ.-H.ZhangZ.-Y.GaoY.et al (2020). Hcn 3–2 survey towards a sample of local galaxies. Publ. Astronomical Soc. Jpn.72, 41. 10.1093/pasj/psaa025
55
LiF.WangJ.GaoF.LiuS.ZhangZ.-Y.LiS.et al (2021). Dense gas in local galaxies revealed by multiple tracers. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.503, 4508–4528. 10.1093/mnras/stab745
56
LiuD.GaoY.IsaakK.DaddiE.YangC.LuN.et al (2015). High-j co versus far-infrared relations in normal and starburst galaxies. Astrophysical J. Lett.810, L14. 10.1088/2041-8205/810/2/l14
57
LiuT.KimK.-T.YooH.LiuS.-y.TatematsuK.QinS.-L.et al (2016). Star formation laws in both galactic massive clumps and external galaxies: extensive study with dust coninuum, hcn (4-3), and cs (7-6). Astrophysical J.829, 59. 10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/59
58
LuN.ZhaoY.Díaz-SantosT.XuC. K.GaoY.ArmusL.et al (2017). A herschel space observatory spectral line survey of local luminous infrared galaxies from 194 to 671 microns. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.230, 1. 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6476
59
MakiwaG.NaylorD. A.FerletM.SaljiC.SwinyardB.PolehamptonE.et al (2013). Beam profile for the herschel–spire fourier transform spectrometer. Appl. Opt.52, 3864–3875. 10.1364/ao.52.003864
60
MartínS.KohnoK.IzumiT.KripsM.MeierD.AladroR.et al (2015). Multimolecule alma observations toward the seyfert 1 galaxy ngc 1097. Astronomy Astrophysics573, A116. 10.1051/0004-6361/201425105
61
MartínS.MauersbergerR.Martín-PintadoJ.HenkelC.García-BurilloS. (2006). A 2 millimeter spectral line survey of the starburst galaxy ngc 253. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.164, 450–476. 10.1086/503297
62
MatsushitaS.BooneF.KripsM.LimJ.MullerS.et al (2015). Resolving the bright hcn (1- 0) emission toward the seyfert 2 nucleus of m51: shock enhancement by radio jets and weak masing by infrared pumping?Astrophysical J.799, 26. 10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/26
63
MeierD. S.TurnerJ. L. (2012). Spatially resolved chemistry in nearby galaxies. ii. the nuclear bar in maffei 2. Astrophysical J.755, 104. 10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/104
64
MeierD. S.WalterF.BolattoA. D.LeroyA. K.OttJ.RosolowskyE.et al (2015). Alma multi-line imaging of the nearby starburst ngc 253. Astrophysical J.801, 63. 10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/63
65
MeijerinkR.KristensenL.WeißA.Van der WerfP.WalterF.SpaansM.et al (2012). Evidence for co shock excitation in ngc 6240 from herschel spire spectroscopy. Astrophysical J. Lett.762, L16. 10.1088/2041-8205/762/2/l16
66
MeijerinkR.SpaansM. (2005). Diagnostics of irradiated gas in galaxy nuclei-i. a far-ultraviolet and x-ray dominated region code. Astronomy Astrophysics436, 397–409. 10.1051/0004-6361:20042398
67
MeijerinkR.SpaansM.IsraelF. (2007). Diagnostics of irradiated dense gas in galaxy nuclei-ii. a grid of xdr and pdr models. Astronomy Astrophysics461, 793–811. 10.1051/0004-6361:20066130
68
MeijerinkR.SpaansM.KampI.AresuG.ThiW.-F.WoitkeP. (2013). Tracing the physical conditions in active galactic nuclei with time-dependent chemistry. J. Phys. Chem. A117, 9593–9604. 10.1021/jp312289f
69
MeijerinkR.SpaansM.LoenenA.van der WerfP. P. (2011). Star formation in extreme environments: the effects of cosmic rays and mechanical heating. Astronomy Astrophysics525, A119. 10.1051/0004-6361/201015136
70
MirabelI.BoothR.GarayG.JohanssonL.SandersD. (1990). Co (1-0) emission from luminous infrared galaxies in the southern hemisphere. Astronomy Astrophysics236, 327–332.
71
NguyenQ.JacksonJ. M.HenkelC.TruongB.MauersbergerR.et al (1992). A survey for extragalactic hcn and hco (+). Astrophysical J.399, 521–532. 10.1086/171944
72
OffnerS. S.BisbasT. G.BellT. A.VitiS. (2014). An alternative accurate tracer of molecular clouds: the ‘x ci-factor. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc. Lett.440, L81–L85. 10.1093/mnrasl/slu013
73
OteoI.ZhangZ.YangC.IvisonR.OmontA.BremerM.et al (2017). High dense gas fraction in intensely star-forming dusty galaxies. Astrophysical J.850, 170. 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ee3
74
PapadopoulosP.DunneL.MaddoxS. (2022). The subthermal excitation of the c i lines in the molecular gas reservoirs of galaxies: its significance and potential utility. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.510, 725–733. 10.1093/mnras/stab3194
75
PapadopoulosP. P.BisbasT. G.ZhangZ.-Y. (2018). New places and phases of co-poor/c i-rich molecular gas in the universe. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.478, 1716–1725. 10.1093/mnras/sty1077
76
PapadopoulosP. P.GreveT. R. (2004). Ci emission in ultraluminous infrared galaxies as a molecular gas mass tracer. Astrophysical J.615, L29–L32. 10.1086/426059
77
PapadopoulosP. P.ThiW.-F.VitiS. (2004). C i lines as tracers of molecular gas, and their prospects at high redshifts. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.351, 147–160. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07762.x
78
PapadopoulosP. P.van der WerfP. P.XilourisE.IsaakK. G.GaoY.MühleS. (2012). The molecular gas in luminous infrared galaxies–i. co lines, extreme physical conditions and their drivers. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.426, 2601–2629. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21001.x
79
PoppingG.DecarliR.ManA. W.NelsonE. J.BétherminM.De BreuckC.et al (2017). ALMA reveals starburst-like interstellar medium conditions in a compact star-forming galaxy atz∼ 2 using [CI] and CO. Astronomy Astrophysics602, A11. 10.1051/0004-6361/201730391
80
PrivonG. C.RicciC.AaltoS.VitiS.ArmusL.Diaz-SantosT.et al (2020). A hard x-ray test of hcn enhancements as a tracer of embedded black hole growth. Astrophysical J.893, 149. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8015
81
PrivonG.Herrero-IllanaR.EvansA.IwasawaK.Perez-TorresM.ArmusL.et al (2015). Excitation mechanisms for hcn (1–0) and hco+ (1–0) in galaxies from the great observatories all-sky lirg survey. Astrophysical J.814, 39. 10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/39
82
ReiterM.ShirleyY. L.WuJ.BroganC.WoottenA.TatematsuK. (2011). The physical properties of high-mass star-forming clumps: A systematic comparison of molecular tracers. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.195, 1. 10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/1
83
SaitoT.MichiyamaT.LiuD.AoY.IonoD.NakanishiK.et al (2020). The 300-pc scale alma view of [c i] 3 p 1–3 p 0, co j= 1–0, and 609-μ m dust continuum in a luminous infrared galaxy. Mon. Notices R. Astronomical Soc.497, 3591–3600. 10.1093/mnras/staa2086
84
SalakD.NakaiN.MiyamotoY.YamauchiA.TsuruT. G. (2013). Large-field co (j= 1 0) observations of the starburst galaxy m 82. Publ. Astronomical Soc. Jpn.65, 66. 10.1093/pasj/65.3.66
85
SalakD.NakaiN.SetaM.MiyamotoY. (2019). Alma observations of atomic carbon [c i](3p1 3p0) and low-j co lines in the starburst galaxy ngc 1808. Astrophysical J.887, 143. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab55dc
86
SandersD.MazzarellaJ.KimD.-C.SuraceJ.SoiferB. (2003). The iras revised bright galaxy sample. Astronomical J.126, 1607–1664. 10.1086/376841
87
SandersD.ScovilleN.SoiferB. (1991). Molecular gas in luminous infrared galaxies. Astrophysical J.370, 158–171. 10.1086/169800
88
ShimajiriY.AndréP.BraineJ.KönyvesV.SchneiderN.BontempsS.et al (2017). Testing the universality of the star-formation efficiency in dense molecular gas. Astronomy Astrophysics604, A74. 10.1051/0004-6361/201730633
89
ShimajiriY.SakaiT.TsukagoshiT.KitamuraY.MomoseM.SaitoM.et al (2013). Extensive [c i] mapping toward the orion-a giant molecular cloud. Astrophysical J. Lett.774, L20. 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/l20
90
SoiferB.NeugebauerG.MatthewsK.EgamiE.BecklinE.WeinbergerA.et al (2000). High resolution mid-infrared imaging of ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astronomical J.119, 509–523. 10.1086/301233
91
SolomonP.DownesD.RadfordS.BarrettJ. (1997). The molecular interstellar medium in ultraluminous infrared galaxies. Astrophysical J.478, 144–161. 10.1086/303765
92
SolomonP.DownesD.RadfordS. (1992). Dense molecular gas and starbursts in ultraluminous galaxies. Astrophysical J.387, L55–L59. 10.1086/186304
93
SternD.AssefR. J.BenfordD. J.BlainA.CutriR.DeyA.et al (2012). Mid-infrared selection of agn with the wide-field infrared survey explorer. i. characterizing wise-selected agn in cosmos. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.0811.
94
StutzkiJ.GrafU.HaasS.HoninghC.HottgenrothD.JacobsK.et al (1997). Atomic carbon in M82: physical conditions derived from simultaneous observations of the [C [CSC]i[/CSC]] fine-structure submillimeter-wave transitions. Astrophysical J.477, L33–L36. 10.1086/310514
95
TanQ.-H.GaoY.ZhangZ.-Y.GreveT. R.JiangX.-J.WilsonC. D.et al (2018). The malatang survey: the l gas–l ir correlation on sub-kiloparsec scale in six nearby star-forming galaxies as traced by hcn j= 4 3 and hco+ j= 4 3. Astrophysical J.860, 165. 10.3847/1538-4357/aac512
96
UseroA.LeroyA. K.WalterF.SchrubaA.García-BurilloS.SandstromK.et al (2015). Variations in the star formation efficiency of the dense molecular gas across the disks of star-forming galaxies. Astronomical J.150, 115. 10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/115
97
ValentinoF.MagdisG. E.DaddiE.LiuD.AravenaM.BournaudF.et al (2018). A survey of atomic carbon [c i] in high-redshift main-sequence galaxies. Astrophysical J.869, 27. 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb88
98
ValentinoF.MagdisG. E.DaddiE.LiuD.AravenaM.BournaudF.et al (2020). The properties of the interstellar medium of galaxies across time as traced by the neutral atomic carbon [c i]. Astrophysical J.890, 24. 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6603
99
VitiS.García-BurilloS.FuenteA.HuntL.UseroA.HenkelC.et al (2014). Molecular line emission in NGC 1068 imaged with ALMA: II. The chemistry of the dense molecular gas⋆. Astronomy Astrophysics570, A28. 10.1051/0004-6361/201424116
100
WangM.HenkelC.ChinY.-N.WhiteoakJ.CunninghamM. H.MauersbergerR.et al (2004). Dense gas in nearby galaxies: XVI. The nuclear starburst environment in NGC 4945. Astronomy Astrophysics422, 883–905. 10.1051/0004-6361:20035722
101
WeißA.DownesD.HenkelC.WalterF. (2005). Atomic carbon at redshift ∼2.5. Astronomy Astrophysics429, L25–L28. 10.1051/0004-6361:200400085
102
WeißA.HenkelC.DownesD.WalterF. (2003). Gas and dust in the cloverleaf quasar at redshift 2.5. Astronomy Astrophysics409, L41–L45. 10.1051/0004-6361:20031337
103
WuJ.EvansN. J. I.GaoY.SolomonP. M.ShirleyY. L.Vanden BoutP. A. (2005). Connecting dense gas tracers of star formation in our galaxy to high-z star formation. Astrophysical J.635, L173–L176. 10.1086/499623
104
WuJ.EvansN. J.IIShirleyY. L.KnezC. (2010). The properties of massive, dense clumps: mapping surveys of hcn and cs. Astrophysical J. Suppl. Ser.188, 313–357. 10.1088/0067-0049/188/2/313
105
YangC.OmontA.BeelenA.GaoY.van Der WerfP.GavazziR.et al (2017). Molecular gas in theHerschel-selected strongly lensed submillimeter galaxies atz ∼ 2–4 as probed by multi-JCO lines. Astronomy Astrophysics608, A144. 10.1051/0004-6361/201731391
106
ZhangZ.-Y.GaoY.HenkelC.ZhaoY.WangJ.MentenK. M.et al (2014). Dense gas tracers and star formation laws in active galaxies: apex survey of hcn j= 4 3, hco+ j= 4 3, and cs j= 7 6. Astrophysical J. Lett.784, L31. 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/l31
107
ZhouJ.ZhangZ.-Y.GaoY.WangJ.ShiY.GuQ.et al (2022). Dense gas and star formation in nearby infrared-bright galaxies: apex survey of hcn and hco+ j= 2 1. Astrophysical J.936, 58. 10.3847/1538-4357/ac82eb
Summary
Keywords
dense molecular gas, star formation-galaxies, sample, HCN (4−3), HCO + (4−3), AGN -active galactic nucleus
Citation
Jiao Q, Gao Y, Tan Q and Gao Y (2023) Dense gas star formation efficiency and the ratio: insights from a statistical study of infrared bright star-forming galaxies. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 10:1246978. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1246978
Received
25 June 2023
Accepted
13 September 2023
Published
03 October 2023
Volume
10 - 2023
Edited by
Milan S. Dimitrijevic, Astronomical Observatory, Serbia
Reviewed by
Toshiki Saito, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), Japan
Xindi Tang, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Jiao, Gao, Tan and Gao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Qian Jiao, jiaoqian@whpu.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.