MINI REVIEW article

Front. Astron. Space Sci., 16 September 2024

Sec. Space Physics

Volume 11 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1464010

Multi-scale processes of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at Earth’s magnetopause

  • 1. PHaSER, Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States

  • 2. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States

  • 3. Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Styria, Austria

  • 4. University of Graz, Institute of Physics, Graz, Styria, Austria

  • 5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States

  • 6. Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM, United States

  • 7. Applied Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD, United States

  • 8. Department of Physical Sciences, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, United States

Abstract

The Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability (KHI) is a large scale convective instability which occurs anywhere the velocity shear between two fluids is large, such as Earth’s magnetopause where the fast flowing magnetosheath abuts the relatively stagnant outer magnetosphere. The KHI was initially believed to contribute only to energy and momentum transfer from the solar wind to the magnetosphere, but was eventually shown to support mass transport and plasma heating. Recent advancements in in-situ observational capabilities and high scale computer modeling have once again shifted our understanding of the KHI from a large scale process, to an active environment which connects the global and kinetic scales through a variety of multi-scale processes and phenomena. In this mini-review, we provide an update on the latest findings in Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) related processes at kinetic scales and the effects of the global environment on KH development.

1 Introduction

The solar wind must supply energy to the magnetosphere at a rate of W to account for the energy dissipated in the auroral oval and the formation of the ring current (). The processes contributing to this energy transfer were first classified in terms of magnetic reconnection (), responsible for mass transfer, and viscous interaction (), responsible for momentum transfer. Spacecraft observations have since verified the existence of magnetic reconnection and its impact on geomagnetic activity (; ; ; ). The primary process responsible for viscous interaction is the velocity shear driven Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI), which is ubiquitous at Earth’s magnetopause (; ).

In the last few decades, it has been shown that the KHI is not only responsible for viscous momentum transfer (), but supports myriad secondary processes down to kinetic scales including reconnection, ion and electron scale plasma waves, and plasma turbulence. These secondary processes can further enhance mixing and heating and in some cases, interact with or drive each other. Recent observations and simulations have also shown that the fluid scale KHI impacts and is impacted by global scale patterns within the magnetosphere and heliosphere. In this mini-review, we provide an overview of the most recent findings which inform our current understanding of the KHI as a phenomena connecting physics across multiple scale sizes.

2 The KHI and kinetic scale processes

Though initially believed to be responsible only for momentum and energy transfer to the magnetosphere (), it is now known that the KHI is also able to drive plasma transport and heating via kinetic scale processes such as reconnection, diffusive transport, and kinetic scale wave modes. Recent technological advances in in-situ measurements (; ; ) and the accessibility of petascale kinetic simulations (), have enabled numerous studies resolving the nature of kinetic scale processes associated with the KHI. In this section we review a few of these phenomena.

2.1 KHI induced reconnection dynamics

As magnetic reconnection requires a thin current sheet, on the order of the ion inertial length, the inertia of the Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) driven vortex motion can provide a powerful external driver for reconnection to occur. An example of one such current sheet driven by KH vortex motion is shown in Figure 1. KHI driven reconnection signatures have been detected by multiple spacecraft missions at both low and high-latitudes (; ; ; ; ; ).

FIGURE 1

. Right panels (A–L) from .

The importance of KHI to reconnection was first recognized by , who compared boundary layer signatures observed by the Geotail spacecraft () during strongly northward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) with two dimensional (2D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations. Those simulations showed that KHI was able to grow to non-linear stages and twist the magnetic fields into an anti-parallel configuration when the IMF and geomagnetic fields were initially parallel along the shear flow direction and the Alfvén speed along the wave vector, , was less than the shear flow speed. This resulted in intense current layers and magnetic reconnection within the high-density filament of the KH vortex. Both 2D MHD () and 2D Hall-MHD () plasma approximations show this mechanism can provide mass transport velocities of 1–2 km/s during strongly northward IMF, corresponding to a diffusion coefficient of 2/s. At this rate, KH activity could populate the plasma sheet with cold, dense magnetosheath material in about two hours.

In three dimensions (3D), magnetic reconnection also occurs above and below the shear flow plane leading to a higher transport rate, /s, during strongly northward IMF (). A comparison of Hall-MHD and test particle simulations with hybrid simulations demonstrated that the particle mixing rates are similar in both cases, but “plasma is transported through a few big magnetic islands […] in the fluid simulation, while magnetic islands in the hybrid simulation are small and patchy” ().

When magnetic fields are initially anti-parallel across the shear flow plane, magnetic reconnection can occur in both the high and low filaments of the vortex, which results in the mixing and capture of low density magnetospheric material into the magnetosheath (; ). In the case of a symmetric plasma density across the shear flow layer, the direction of plasma transport is determined by the strength of the current density in either spine ().

The 3D dynamics of magnetic reconnection driven by the KHI during southward IMF have been associated with Alfvénic plasma jets propagating perpendicular to the initial shear flow plane and the escape of magnetospheric electrons into the magnetosheath (). Simulations of this geometry have shown that the KHI can increase the reconnection rate even when the Hall term is switched off (; ).

Reconnection in KH vortices often leads to the mixing of plasmas with different energies and densities which can lead to anisotropic velocity distribution functions (; ) and the generation of ion and electron scale plasma waves which can in turn lead to ion and electron heating (; ; ). The KHI can also effectively drive plasma turbulence to further enhance plasma heating (; ). Thus, the efficiency of plasma transport due to reconnection within KHI should not be considered in isolation with regard to other kinetic scale processes, as will be discussed in the following sections.

2.2 Diffusive transport within the KHI

The large-scale KHI has been found to drive secondary instabilities like the Rayleigh-Taylor instability () and/or secondary KHI (; ; ) which interfere with the large-scale evolution of KH vortices and influence the transport of plasma. Inside fully developed vortices, turbulence (; ) and magnetic reconnection (see Sec.2.1) lead to diffusive particle transport. At the spine region of the vortices, magnetic reconnection can strongly influence the diffusive transport within the KHI.

Further, the multi-scale nature of the KHI has been discussed in previous studies focusing on turbulent intermittency and anisotropy related to the KHI (), nonlinear wave-particle interactions () and the distortions of the ion distribution functions due to kinetic effects (; ). More recently, and , reported the development of the Lower Hybrid Drift Instability (LHDI) and a related thickening of the spine region of KH vortices by diffusive plasma transport during southward IMF from both kinetic simulations and MMS data. Further, identified small-scale current sheets and ongoing electron-only reconnection related to this diffusive process, shown in Figure 1. These results highlight the importance of a multi-scale and multi-process approach for future studies of the KHI.

2.3 Wave heating driven by the KHI

The plasma mixing, magnetic field twisting, and strong gradients of density, velocity, and pressure inherent to the KHI can support the growth of wave modes which in turn leads to plasma heating. Several wave modes associated with the KHI are known to drive plasma heating across scale sizes at the magnetopause boundary. At the ion scale the most intensely studied are Kinetic Alfvén waves (KAWs), electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves, and magnetosonic waves.

For example, velocity gradients both parallel and perpendicular to the background magnetic field are known to drive electrostatic and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves (; ; ; ). demonstrated that EMIC waves may also be generated in regions where hot anisotropic plasma overlaps with a separate cold and dense population as is the case in well developed KH vortices where hot magnetospheric plasma is mixed or captured into the magnetosheath.

The strong magnetic field gradients present in the KHI also give rise to Alfvén resonance regions, where the surface wave speed matches the local Alfvén speed. At these regions, surface Alfvén waves mode convert to KAWs (; ). KAWs energize and demagnetize ions, allowing cross field transport of sheath ions into the magnetosphere where they contribute to boundary layer formation ; . A portion of the KAW electric field is parallel to the background magnetic field, allowing for field aligned electron heating (; ).

Kinetic magnetosonic waves, the kinetic counterpart of fast mode MHD waves, can arise from shell distributions in the ion population, such as those produced by reconnection within KH vortices. Fast mode waves carry energy perpendicularly across field lines and can be triggered by a combination of fast sheath flows and pressure perturbations, which appear at the center of KH vortices. Fast mode and kinetic magnetosonic waves have been shown, both in theory and observation, to effectively heat ions (; ; ; ).

In recent years, advances in in-situ instrumentation have allowed significant progress investigating the effects of KH associated waves above the ion cyclotron frequency. Observations of ion acoustic waves and turbulence within KH vortices were reported shortly after MMS’s launch (; ). Lower hybrid waves have also been observed and kinetic simulations indicate they are effectively able to heat the cold sheath plasma as it mixes with the magnetospheric population (; ).

3 KHI and global scale influence

The KHI is subject to influence by changes in the larger heliospheric environment, such as IMF orientation and seasonal variations. Consider that even though the KHI can and does occur for all IMF orientations (; ), including southward IMF (; ; ), the IMF orientation can influence its occurrence rate and location. found that during Parker-Spiral IMF, the KHI occurs most frequently at the dawn sector due to smaller magnetic tension (); while at the dusk sector it is detected mostly for strongly northward IMF (; ). The KHI is not restricted to the equatorial plane, and has been detected at high-latitudes close to the exterior cusp (; ; ). The KHI can also, in turn, affect global scale processes, such as the development of the magnetospheric plasma sheet. In this section we provide an overview of the global scale processes affecting and affected by the KHI.

3.1 Comparison of plasma transport at the cusps and flanks

During extended periods of northward IMF, solar wind entry into the magnetosphere leads to the formation of a cold, dense plasma sheet (CDPS) (). The CDPS exhibits a characteristic dawn-dusk asymmetry in density and temperature (). In general, the dawnside plasma sheet is denser than the duskside and exhibits a broad thermal distribution while the duskside plasma sheet comprises disjoint hot and cold populations (). The two primary entry paths of the solar wind into the magnetosphere during northward IMF are the KHI at the low-latitude magnetospheric flanks and double cusp reconnection at high-latitudes.

Only recently has it become feasible for global modeling to directly study the relative importance of cusp and flank entry to the formation of the CDPS and the development of dawn-dusk asymmetry. used a combination of high-resolution global MHD and test particle simulations during a synthetic interval of northward IMF to track the entry of solar wind plasma into the magnetosphere and its acceleration on its way to the central plasma sheet. They found comparable contributions from flank-entering (KHI) and cusp-entering (high-latitude reconnection) plasma, but very different effects on the entering plasma. Flank-entering plasma was largely cold and dawn-dusk symmetric, while cusp-entering plasma was predominantly deflected dawnward and accelerated through its interaction with the dusk-dawn directed high-latitude electric field (). The net impact is that the dawnside plasma contains the cold flank-entering plasma and a wide range of accelerated cusp-entering plasma, consistent with the broad thermal distribution observed, as shown in Figure 2. The duskside plasma consists of cold flank-entering plasma and a high-energy subset of the dawnside cusp-entering plasma that is able to drift to the duskside. In this way, it is found that the observed dawn-dusk thermodynamic asymmetries are a consequence of the combined cusp- and flank-entering populations.

FIGURE 2

, global simulations indicate KHI driven flank entry and reconnection driven cusp entry of solar wind plasma contribute to dawn-dusk asymmetries in the magnetopshere. Energy distributions of test particles that reside in the dusk (A) and dawn (B) flank; and equatorial projections of test particles initialized in the solar wind colored by their energy, using separate color maps based their entry either through the cusp or flank (C). At top right, adapted from , the relative orientation of Earth’s rotation axis (black arrow) to the ecliptic plane is subject to seasonal variation. A survey of in situ observations, bottom right, from , shows KHI occurrence rate (orange bars) is maximized(minimized) at equinoxes(solstices).

3.2 Dipole tilt effects

New results highlight KHI as an important factor in enhanced geomagnetic activity around the equinox. used data from THEMIS () and MMS () over a full solar cycle to investigate the impact of Earth’s dipole orientation on the formation and occurrence of KHI and found that the KHI exhibits seasonal variation. The KHI is more commonly produced during the equinoxes when Earth’s dipole is not tilted toward or away from the Sun, which favors the formation of the KHI at the magnetopause. During solstices, when Earth’s dipole is tilted at extremes toward or away from the Sun, Earth’s magnetic field suppresses KH wave activity ().

At Earth’s magnetopause the KHI is primarily driven by a velocity shear aligned with the wave vector, . Any magnetic field component aligned with acts to stabilize the KHI. This stabilization is facilitated by magnetic tensions in the magnetosheath and magnetosphere, which are associated with the IMF and geomagnetic dipole field, respectively. The orientation of Earth’s magnetic dipole axis varies both seasonally and diurnally due to the combined effects of Earth’s orbit around the Sun (as seen in Figure 2) and the rotation of the magnetic dipole about Earth’s rotation axis. These variations introduce seasonal and diurnal fluctuations in the growth of the KHI by altering the intensity of the magnetic tension forces.

The tilt of Earth’s dipole axis towards or away from the sun modulates the magnetic tension due to the orientation of the magnetospheric field relative to the shear flow in the GSM-X-Y plane. At equinoxes, the dipole axis is aligned with the GSM-Z axis, perpendicular to the velocity, and the magnetospheric magnetic tension diminishes to 0. Consequently, the dipole field lines exert no stabilizing influence on the KHI and the probability of KHI occurrence increases. At solstices, when the dipole is at its maximum angle relative to the GSM-Z axis, the magnetospheric magnetic tension is also maximized and exerts more stabilizing force on the KHI, which decreases the probability of KHI occurrence. These effects have been confirmed in observations by , as shown in Figure 2.

The dominance of the shear flow in the X direction suggests that the magnetosphere’s magnetic tension, influenced by the dipole’s tilt towards or away from the Sun, plays a significant role in stabilizing KHI. Consequently, the equinoctial effect exerts a significant influence on the seasonal and daily variations of KHI, as corroborated by KHI occurrence rate analysis in .

4 Discussion and conclusion

As recounted here, recent advancements in observational and computational capabilities have expanded our understanding of the KHI as an active environment which influences and is influenced by processes across scales sizes. At kinetic scales, reconnection, diffusive transport, and wave activity contribute to enhanced plasma transport and heating. These small scale processes can also interrupt the development of KH vortices from linear to non-linear and rolled up stages. At global scales, the location and occurrence of KHI is modulated by IMF orientation and seasonal dipole tilt effects. The KHI contributes to the formation of the CDPS during northward IMF and its pronounced dawn-dusk asymmetry. Overall, the results summarized here paint a picture of the magnetopause not as a static boundary that is merely traversed by solar wind plasma, but as an active participant in the transfer of mass between the magnetosphere and solar wind, a process in which the KHI plays a significant role.

Questions still remain about the nature and development of the KHI. What are the origins of energetic particles within the KHI? How might geomagetic storm conditions affect the development of the KHI? What effects might heavy ion species have on the behavior of the KHI? What influence does the KHI exert throughout the heliosphere, such as at the edges of coronal mass ejections, co-rotating interaction regions, or other planetary magnetospheres? Evidence of KH activity has been observed at Mercury (), Mars (; ; ), Saturn (; ; ), and Jupiter (; ), but it is not yet known how the scale size of the planetary magnetosphere affects the multi-scale nature of the KHI.

The above questions and our new understanding of the KHI as a multi-scale process should inform the direction of future research. New studies on the diffusive transport within the KH vortices should consider the multi-scale and multi-effect nature of the KHI rather than focusing on single effects and scales. Efforts should be made to relate the KHI to global parameters, such as the solar wind conditions and season, in order to obtain a global picture of the instability, its influences, and the implications for global solar wind transport. Simulation studies should consider the role of more realistic solar wind IMF orientations or the role of kinetic physics (e.g., ) in KHI development and its effects. Space weather forecasters may incorporate dipole tilt effects on KHI into their models, resulting in more accurate and reliable forecasting.

Statements

Author contributions

RR: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KB: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KN: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SK: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KS: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. Y-LL: Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Work by RCR is funded via MMS Early Career Grant #80NSSC23K1601. KB is supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P32175-N27. KN is supported by NASA LWS Grant #80NSSC23K0899. SK is funded by NSF award #2307203. KAS acknowledges support by the NASA DRIVE Science Center for Geospace Storms (CGS) under award 80NSSC22M0163 and NASA grants #80NSSC19K0241, #80NSSC20K1833, #80NSSC17K0679, and #80NSSC24K1106. Y-LL is funded by NASA LWS Grant #80NSSC23K0899 and NSF Grant #2308853. This review was supported by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, through ISSI International Team project #546 “Magnetohydrodynamic Surface Waves at Earth’s Magnetosphere (and Beyond).”

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AngelopoulosV. (2008). The THEMIS mission. Space Sci. Rev.141, 534. 10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1

  • 2

    AngelopoulosV.KennelC. F.CoronitiF. V.PellatR.KivelsonM. G.WalkerR. J.et al (1994). Statistical characteristics of bursty bulk flow events. J. Geophys. Res.99, 2125721280. 10.1029/94JA01263

  • 3

    AxfordW. I.HinesC. O. (1961). A unifying theory of high latitude geophysical phenomena and geomagnetic storms. Can. J. Phys.39, 14331464. 10.1139/p61-172

  • 4

    BlaslK. A.NakamuraT. K. M.NakamuraR.SettinoA.HasegawaH.VörösZ.et al (2023). Electron-scale reconnecting current sheet formed within the lower-hybrid wave-active region of kelvin-helmholtz waves. Geophys. Rev. Lett.50, e2023GL104309. 10.1029/2023GL104309

  • 5

    BlaslK. A.NakamuraT. K. M.PlaschkeF.NakamuraR.HasegawaH.StawarzJ. E.et al (2022). Multi-scale observations of the magnetopause Kelvin–Helmholtz waves during southward IMF. Phys. Plasmas29, 012105. 10.1063/5.0067370

  • 6

    BowersK. J.AlbrightB. J.YinL.DaughtonW.RoytershteynV.BergenB.et al (2009) “Advances in petascale kinetic plasma simulation with VPIC and Roadrunner,” in Journal of physics conference series. 10.1088/1742-6596/180/1/012055012055

  • 7

    BurchJ. L.MooreT. E.TorbertR. B.GilesB. L. (2016a). Magnetospheric multiscale overview and science objectives. Space Sci. Rev.199, 521. 10.1007/s11214-015-0164-9

  • 8

    BurchJ. L.TorbertR. B.PhanT. D.ChenL.-J.MooreT. E.ErgunR. E.et al (2016b). Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space. Science352, aaf2939. 10.1126/science.aaf2939

  • 9

    BurkeW. J.KelleyM. C.SagalynR. C.SmiddyM.LaiS. T. (1979). Polar cap electric field structures with a northward interplanetary magnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett.6, 2124. 10.1029/GL006i001p00021

  • 10

    BurkholderB. L.DelamereP. A.JohnsonJ. R.NgC.-S. (2020a). Identifying active kelvin–helmholtz vortices on saturn’s magnetopause boundary. Geophys. Res. Lett.47. 10.1029/2019GL084206

  • 11

    BurkholderB. L.NykyriK.MaX.RiceR.FuselierS. A.TrattnerK. J.et al (2020b). Magnetospheric multiscale observation of an electron diffusion region at high latitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett.47, e2020GL087268. 10.1029/2020GL087268

  • 12

    ChastonC. C.WilberM.FujimotoM.GoldsteinM. L.AcunaM.RémeH.et al (2007). Mode conversion and anomalous transport in kelvin-helmholtz vortices and kinetic alfvén waves at the earth’s magnetopause. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 175004. 10.1103/physrevlett.99.175004

  • 13

    DelamereP. A.NgC. S.DamianoP. A.NeupaneB. R.JohnsonJ. R.BurkholderB.et al (2021). Kelvin–helmholtz-related turbulent heating at saturn’s magnetopause boundary. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.126, e2020JA028479. 10.1029/2020JA028479

  • 14

    DialynasK. (2018). Cassini/mimi observations on the dungey cycle reconnection and kelvin-helmholtz instability in saturn’s magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.123, 72717275. 10.1029/2018JA025840

  • 15

    DungeyJ. W. (1961). Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones. Physcical6, 4748. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.47

  • 16

    ErikssonS.LavraudB.WilderF. D.StawarzJ. E.GilesB. L.BurchJ. L.et al (2016). Magnetospheric Multiscale observations of magnetic reconnection associated with Kelvin-Helmholtz waves. Geophys. Rev. Lett.43, 56065615. 10.1002/2016GL068783

  • 17

    EscoubetC. P.FehringerM.GoldsteinM. (2001). Introduction: the cluster mission. Ann. Geophys.19, 11971200. 10.5194/angeo-19-1197-2001

  • 18

    FaganelloM.CalifanoF.PegoraroF. (2008). Competing mechanisms of plasma transport in inhomogeneous configurations with velocity shear: the solar-wind interaction with earth’s magnetosphere. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 015001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.015001

  • 19

    FairfieldD. H.OttoA.MukaiT.KokubunS.LeppingR. P.SteinbergJ. T.et al (2000). Geotail observations of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the eqatorial magnetotail boundary for parallel northward fields. J. Geophys. Res.105, 2115921174. 10.1029/1999JA000316

  • 20

    HasegawaA. (1976). Particle acceleration by mhd surface wave and formation of aurora. J. Geophys. Res.81, 50835090. 10.1029/ja081i028p05083

  • 21

    HenryZ. W.NykyriK.MooreT. W.DimmockA. P.MaX. (2017). On the dawn-dusk asymmetry of the kelvin-helmholtz instability between 2007 and 2013. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.122 (11), 88811,900. 10.1002/2017JA024548

  • 22

    HwangK.-J.GoldsteinM. L.KuznetsovaM. M.WangY.VikasA. F.SibeckD. G. (2012). The first in situ observation of kelvin-helmholtz waves at high-latitude magnetopause during strongly dawnward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.117, 21562202. 10.1029/2011JA017256

  • 23

    HwangK.-J.KuznetsovaM. M.SahraouiF.GoldsteinM. L.LeeE.ParksG. K. (2011). Kelvin-Helmholtz waves under southward interplanetary magnetic field. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.116, A08210. 10.1029/2011JA016596

  • 24

    JohnsonJ. R.ChengC. (2001). Stochastic ion heating at the magnetopause due to kinetic alfvén waves. Geophys. Res. Lett.28, 44214424. 10.1029/2001gl013509

  • 25

    KavosiS.RaederJ. (2015). Ubiquity of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves at Earth/’s magnetopause. Nat. Commun.6, 7019. 10.1038/ncomms8019

  • 26

    KavosiS.ReaderJ.JohnsonJ. R.NykyriK.FarrugiaC. J. (2023). Seasonal and diurnal variations of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability at terrestrial magnetopause. Nat. Commun.14, 2513. 10.1038/s41467-023-37485-x

  • 27

    KimS.-H.AgrimsonE.MillerM. J.D’AngeloN.MerlinoR. L.GanguliG. I. (2004). Amplification of electrostatic ion-cyclotron waves in a plasma with magnetic-field-aligned ion flow shear and no electron current. Phys. plasmas11, 45014505. 10.1063/1.1780531

  • 28

    LembegeB.RatliffS.DawsonJ.OhsawaY. (1983). Ion heating and acceleration by strong magnetosonic waves. Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 264267. 10.1103/physrevlett.51.264

  • 29

    LiS.-S.AngelopoulosV.RunovA.KiehasS. A.ZhouX.-Z. (2013). Plasmoid growth and expulsion revealed by two-point ARTEMIS observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.118, 21332144. 10.1002/jgra.50105

  • 30

    LiT.LiW.TangB.KhotyaintsevY. V.GrahamD. B.ArdakaniA.et al (2023). Kelvin-helmholtz waves and magnetic reconnection at the earth’s magnetopause under southward interplanetary magnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett.50, e2023GL105539. 10.1029/2023GL105539

  • 31

    LiW.AndréM.KhotyaintsevY. V.VaivadsA.GrahamD. B.Toledo-RedondoS.et al (2016). Kinetic evidence of magnetic reconnection due to Kelvin-Helmholtz waves. Geophys. Rev. Lett.43, 56355643. 10.1002/2016GL069192

  • 32

    MaX.DelamereP.OttoA.BurkholderB. (2017). Plasma transport driven by the three-dimensional kelvin-helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.122 (10), 1038210395. 10.1002/2017JA024394

  • 33

    MaX.DelamereP. A.NykyriK.BurkholderB.NeupaneB.RiceR. C. (2019). Comparison between fluid simulation with test particles and hybrid simulation for the kelvin-helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.124, 66546668. 10.1029/2019JA026890

  • 34

    MaX.DelamereP. A.OttoA. (2016). Plasma transport driven by the Rayleigh-taylor instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.121, 52605271. 10.1002/2015JA022122

  • 35

    MaX.OttoA.DelamereP. A. (2014a). Interaction of magnetic reconnection and Kelvin-Helmholtz modes for large magnetic shear: 1. Kelvin-Helmholtz trigger. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.119, 781797. 10.1002/2013JA019224

  • 36

    MaX.OttoA.DelamereP. A. (2014b). Interaction of magnetic reconnection and Kelvin-Helmholtz modes for large magnetic shear: 2. reconnection trigger. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.119, 808820. 10.1002/2013JA019225

  • 37

    MaX.StaufferB.DelamereP. A.OttoA. (2015). Asymmetric kelvin-helmholtz propagation at saturn’s dayside magnetopause. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.120, 18671875. 10.1002/2014JA020746

  • 38

    MatsumotoY.HoshinoM. (2004). Onset of turbulence induced by a Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex. Geophys. Rev. Lett.31, L02807. 10.1029/2003GL018195

  • 39

    MiuraA. (1987). Simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetospheric boundary. J. Geophys. Res.92, 31953206. 10.1029/JA092iA04p03195

  • 40

    MontgomeryJ.EbertR. W.AllegriniF.BagenalF.BoltonS. J.DiBraccioG. A.et al (2023). Investigating the occurrence of kelvin-helmholtz instabilities at jupiter’s dawn magnetopause. Geophys. Res. Lett.50. 10.1029/2023GL102921

  • 41

    MooreT. W.NykyriK.DimmockA. P. (2016). Cross-scale energy transport in space plasmas. Nat. Phys.12, 11641169. 10.1038/NPHYS3869

  • 42

    MooreT. W.NykyriK.DimmockA. P. (2017). Ion-scale wave properties and enhanced ion heating across the low-latitude boundary layer during kelvin-helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.122, 11,12811,153. 10.1002/2017JA024591

  • 43

    NakamuraT. K.HayashiD.FujimotoM.ShinoharaI. (2004). Decay of MHD-scale kelvin-helmholtz vortices mediated by parasitic electron dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 145001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.145001

  • 44

    NakamuraT. K. M.BlaslK. A.HasegawaH.UmedaT.LiuY. H.PeeryS. A.et al (2022a). Multi-scale evolution of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves at the Earth’s magnetopause during southward IMF periods. Phys. Plasmas29, 012901. 10.1063/5.0067391

  • 45

    NakamuraT. K. M.BlaslK. A.LiuY. H.PeeryS. A. (2022b). Diffusive plasma transport by the magnetopause Kelvin-Helmholtz instability during southward IMF. Front. Astronomy Space Sci.8. 10.3389/fspas.2021.809045

  • 46

    NishinoM.FujimotoM.UenoG.MaezawaK.MukaiT.SaitoY. (2007). Geotail observations of two-component protons in the midnight plasma sheet. Ann. Geophys. Copernic. Publ. Göttingen, Ger.25, 22292245. 10.5194/angeo-25-2229-2007

  • 47

    NykyriK. (2013). Impact of MHD shock physics on magnetosheath asymmetry and Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.118, 50685081. 10.1002/jgra.50499

  • 48

    NykyriK.GrisonB.CargillP.LavraudB.LucekE.DandourasI.et al (2006a). Origin of the turbulent spectra in the high-altitude cusp: cluster spacecraft observations. Ann. Geophys. Copernic. GmbH24, 10571075. 10.5194/angeo-24-1057-2006

  • 49

    NykyriK.LucekP. J. C. E. A.HorburyT. S.BaloghA.LavraudB.DandourasI.et al (2003a). Ion cyclotron waves in the high altitude cusp: CLUSTER observations at varying spacecraft separations. Geophys. Res. Lett.30. 10.1029/2003GL018594

  • 50

    NykyriK.MaX.BurkholderB.RiceR.JohnsonJ.KimE.-K.et al (2021a). MMS observations of the multi-scale wave structures and parallel electron heating in the vicinity of the southern exterior cusp. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.126. 10.1029/2019JA027698

  • 51

    NykyriK.MaX.JohnsonJ. (2021b). Cross-scale energy transport in space plasmas. Am. Geophys. Union AGU, 109121. chap. 7. 10.1002/9781119815624.ch7

  • 52

    NykyriK.OttoA. (2001). Plasma transport at the magnetospheric boundary due to reconnection in Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices. Geophys. Res. Lett.28, 35653568. 10.1029/2001GL013239

  • 53

    NykyriK.OttoA. (2004). Influence of the Hall term on KH instability and reconnection inside kh vortices. Ann. Geophys.22, 935949. 10.5194/angeo-22-935-2004

  • 54

    NykyriK.OttoA.BüchnerJ.NikutowskiB.BaumjohannW.KistlerL. M.et al (2003b). Equator-S observations of boundary signatures: FTE’s orKelvin-Helmholtz waves?Wash. D.C. Am. Geophys. Union Geophys. Monogr. Ser.133, 205210. 10.1029/133GM20

  • 55

    NykyriK.OttoA.LavraudB.MouikisC.KistlerL.BaloghA.et al (2006b). Cluster observations of reconnection due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the dawn side magnetospheric flank. Ann. Geophys.24, 26192643. 10.5194/angeo-24-2619-2006

  • 56

    OierosetM.RaederJ.PhanT. D.WingS.McFaddenJ. P.LiW.et al (2005). Global cooling and densification of the plasma sheet during an extended period of purely northward IMF on October 22–24, 2003. Geophys. Res. Lett.32. 10.1029/2004GL021523

  • 57

    OsmaneA.DimmockA. P.NaderpourR.PulkkinenT. I.NykyriK. (2015). The impact of solar wind ULFBzfluctuations on geomagnetic activity for viscous timescales during strongly northward and southward IMF. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.120, 93079322. 10.1002/2015JA021505

  • 58

    OttoA.FairfieldD. H. (2000). Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetotail boundary: MHD simulation and comparison with Geotail observations. J. Geophys. Res.105, 2117521190. 10.1029/1999ja000312

  • 59

    ParalJ.RankinR. (2013). Dawn–dusk asymmetry in the kelvin–helmholtz instability at mercury. Nat. Commun.4, 1645. 10.1038/ncomms2676

  • 60

    PaschmannG.PapamastorakisI.SckopkeN.HaerendelG.SonnerupB. U. O.BameS. J.et al (1979). Plasma acceleration at the earth’s magnetopause - evidence for reconnection. Nature282, 243246. 10.1038/282243a0

  • 61

    PeñanoJ. R.GanguliG. (2002). Generation of electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves in the ionosphere by localized transverse dc electric fields. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.107, 1417. 10.1029/2001JA000279

  • 62

    PohG.EspleyJ. R.NykyriK.FowlerC. M.MaX.XuS.et al (2021). On the growth and development of non-linear kelvin–helmholtz instability at mars: maven observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.126. 10.1029/2021JA029224

  • 63

    RanquistD. A.BagenalF.WilsonR. J.HospodarskyG.EbertR. W.AllegriniF.et al (2019). Survey of jupiter’s dawn magnetosheath using juno. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.124, 91069123. 10.1029/2019JA027382

  • 64

    RiceR. C.NykyriK.MaX.BurkholderB. L. (2022). Characteristics of kelvin–helmholtz waves as observed by the mms from september 2015 to march 2020. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.127. 10.1029/2021JA029685

  • 65

    RuhunusiriS.HalekasJ. S.McFaddenJ. P.ConnerneyJ. E. P.EspleyJ. R.HaradaY.et al (2016). Maven observations of partially developed kelvin-helmholtz vortices at mars. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 47634773. 10.1002/2016GL068926

  • 66

    SettinoA.MalaraF.PezziO.OnofriM.PerroneD.ValentiniF. (2020). Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at proton scales with an exact kinetic equilibrium. Astrophysical J.901, 17. 10.3847/1538-4357/abada9

  • 67

    SettinoA.PerroneD.KhotyaintsevY. V.GrahamD. B.ValentiniF. (2021). Kinetic features for the identification of kelvin-helmholtz vortices in in situ observations. Astrophysical J.912, 154. 10.3847/1538-4357/abf1f5

  • 68

    SorathiaK. A.MerkinV. G.UkhorskiyA. Y.AllenR. C.NykyriK.WingS. (2019). Solar wind ion entry into the magnetosphere during northward imf. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.124, 54615481. 10.1029/2019JA026728

  • 69

    Sorriso-ValvoL.CatapanoF.RetinòA.Le ContelO.PerroneD.RobertsO. W.et al (2019). Turbulence-driven ion beams in the magnetospheric kelvin-helmholtz instability. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 035102. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.035102

  • 70

    StawarzJ. E.ErikssonS.WilderF. D.ErgunR. E.SchwartzS. J.PouquetA.et al (2016). Observations of turbulence in a kelvin-helmholtz event on 8 september 2015 by the magnetospheric multiscale mission. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.121, 11,02111,034. 10.1002/2016JA023458

  • 71

    TaylorM. G. G. T.HasegawaH.LavraudB.PhanT.EscoubetC. P.DunlopM. W.et al (2012). Spatial distribution of rolled up Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices at Earth’s dayside and flank magnetopause. Ann. Geophys.30, 10251035. 10.5194/angeo-30-1025-2012

  • 72

    TerasawaT.NambuM. (1989). Ion heating and acceleration by magnetosonic waves via cyclotron subharmonic resonance. Geophys. Res. Lett.16, 357360. 10.1029/gl016i005p00357

  • 73

    WangX.XuX.YeY.WangJ.WangM.ZhouZ.et al (2022). Maven observations of the kelvin-helmholtz instability developing at the ionopause of mars. Geophys. Res. Lett.49. 10.1029/2022GL098673

  • 74

    WilderF.ErgunR.SchwartzS.NewmanD.ErikssonS.StawarzJ.et al (2016). Observations of large-amplitude, parallel, electrostatic waves associated with the kelvin-helmholtz instability by the magnetospheric multiscale mission. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 88598866. 10.1002/2016gl070404

  • 75

    WingS.JohnsonJ. R.ChastonC. C.EchimM.EscoubetC. P.LavraudB.et al (2014). Review of solar wind entry into and transport within the plasma sheet. Space Sci. Rev.184, 3386. 10.1007/s11214-014-0108-9

  • 76

    WingS.JohnsonJ. R.NewellP. T.MengC.-I. (2005). Dawn-dusk asymmetries, ion spectra, and sources in the northward interplanetary magnetic field plasma sheet. J. Geophys. Res.110. 10.1029/2005JA011086

  • 77

    ZhangJ.CoffeyV. N.ChandlerM. O.BoardsenS. A.SaikinA. A.MelloE. M.et al (2017). Properties, propagation, and excitation of emic waves observed by mms: a case study. Marshall Space Flight Center Faculty Fellowship Program, 213.

Summary

Keywords

Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, plasma transport, reconnection, multi-scale processes, diffusive transport, turbulence

Citation

Rice RC, Blasl KA, Nykyri K, Kavosi S, Sorathia KA and Liou Y-L (2024) Multi-scale processes of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at Earth’s magnetopause. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 11:1464010. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2024.1464010

Received

12 July 2024

Accepted

27 August 2024

Published

16 September 2024

Volume

11 - 2024

Edited by

Michel Blanc, UMR5277 Institut de recherche en astrophysique et planétologie (IRAP), France

Reviewed by

Binbin Ni, Wuhan University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Rachel C. Rice,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics