Abstract
The Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability (KHI) is a large scale convective instability which occurs anywhere the velocity shear between two fluids is large, such as Earth’s magnetopause where the fast flowing magnetosheath abuts the relatively stagnant outer magnetosphere. The KHI was initially believed to contribute only to energy and momentum transfer from the solar wind to the magnetosphere, but was eventually shown to support mass transport and plasma heating. Recent advancements in in-situ observational capabilities and high scale computer modeling have once again shifted our understanding of the KHI from a large scale process, to an active environment which connects the global and kinetic scales through a variety of multi-scale processes and phenomena. In this mini-review, we provide an update on the latest findings in Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) related processes at kinetic scales and the effects of the global environment on KH development.
1 Introduction
The solar wind must supply energy to the magnetosphere at a rate of W to account for the energy dissipated in the auroral oval and the formation of the ring current (). The processes contributing to this energy transfer were first classified in terms of magnetic reconnection (), responsible for mass transfer, and viscous interaction (), responsible for momentum transfer. Spacecraft observations have since verified the existence of magnetic reconnection and its impact on geomagnetic activity (; ; ; ). The primary process responsible for viscous interaction is the velocity shear driven Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI), which is ubiquitous at Earth’s magnetopause (; ).
In the last few decades, it has been shown that the KHI is not only responsible for viscous momentum transfer (), but supports myriad secondary processes down to kinetic scales including reconnection, ion and electron scale plasma waves, and plasma turbulence. These secondary processes can further enhance mixing and heating and in some cases, interact with or drive each other. Recent observations and simulations have also shown that the fluid scale KHI impacts and is impacted by global scale patterns within the magnetosphere and heliosphere. In this mini-review, we provide an overview of the most recent findings which inform our current understanding of the KHI as a phenomena connecting physics across multiple scale sizes.
2 The KHI and kinetic scale processes
Though initially believed to be responsible only for momentum and energy transfer to the magnetosphere (), it is now known that the KHI is also able to drive plasma transport and heating via kinetic scale processes such as reconnection, diffusive transport, and kinetic scale wave modes. Recent technological advances in in-situ measurements (; ; ) and the accessibility of petascale kinetic simulations (), have enabled numerous studies resolving the nature of kinetic scale processes associated with the KHI. In this section we review a few of these phenomena.
2.1 KHI induced reconnection dynamics
As magnetic reconnection requires a thin current sheet, on the order of the ion inertial length, the inertia of the Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) driven vortex motion can provide a powerful external driver for reconnection to occur. An example of one such current sheet driven by KH vortex motion is shown in Figure 1. KHI driven reconnection signatures have been detected by multiple spacecraft missions at both low and high-latitudes (; ; ; ; ; ).
FIGURE 1
The importance of KHI to reconnection was first recognized by
In three dimensions (3D), magnetic reconnection also occurs above and below the shear flow plane leading to a higher transport rate, /s, during strongly northward IMF (
When magnetic fields are initially anti-parallel across the shear flow plane, magnetic reconnection can occur in both the high and low filaments of the vortex, which results in the mixing and capture of low density magnetospheric material into the magnetosheath (
The 3D dynamics of magnetic reconnection driven by the KHI during southward IMF have been associated with Alfvénic plasma jets propagating perpendicular to the initial shear flow plane and the escape of magnetospheric electrons into the magnetosheath (
Reconnection in KH vortices often leads to the mixing of plasmas with different energies and densities which can lead to anisotropic velocity distribution functions (
2.2 Diffusive transport within the KHI
The large-scale KHI has been found to drive secondary instabilities like the Rayleigh-Taylor instability (
Further, the multi-scale nature of the KHI has been discussed in previous studies focusing on turbulent intermittency and anisotropy related to the KHI (
2.3 Wave heating driven by the KHI
The plasma mixing, magnetic field twisting, and strong gradients of density, velocity, and pressure inherent to the KHI can support the growth of wave modes which in turn leads to plasma heating. Several wave modes associated with the KHI are known to drive plasma heating across scale sizes at the magnetopause boundary. At the ion scale the most intensely studied are Kinetic Alfvén waves (KAWs), electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves, and magnetosonic waves.
For example, velocity gradients both parallel and perpendicular to the background magnetic field are known to drive electrostatic and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves (
The strong magnetic field gradients present in the KHI also give rise to Alfvén resonance regions, where the surface wave speed matches the local Alfvén speed. At these regions, surface Alfvén waves mode convert to KAWs (
Kinetic magnetosonic waves, the kinetic counterpart of fast mode MHD waves, can arise from shell distributions in the ion population, such as those produced by reconnection within KH vortices. Fast mode waves carry energy perpendicularly across field lines and can be triggered by a combination of fast sheath flows and pressure perturbations, which appear at the center of KH vortices. Fast mode and kinetic magnetosonic waves have been shown, both in theory and observation, to effectively heat ions (
In recent years, advances in in-situ instrumentation have allowed significant progress investigating the effects of KH associated waves above the ion cyclotron frequency. Observations of ion acoustic waves and turbulence within KH vortices were reported shortly after MMS’s launch (
3 KHI and global scale influence
The KHI is subject to influence by changes in the larger heliospheric environment, such as IMF orientation and seasonal variations. Consider that even though the KHI can and does occur for all IMF orientations (
3.1 Comparison of plasma transport at the cusps and flanks
During extended periods of northward IMF, solar wind entry into the magnetosphere leads to the formation of a cold, dense plasma sheet (CDPS) (
Only recently has it become feasible for global modeling to directly study the relative importance of cusp and flank entry to the formation of the CDPS and the development of dawn-dusk asymmetry.
FIGURE 2

KHI on a Global Scale. At left, from
3.2 Dipole tilt effects
New results highlight KHI as an important factor in enhanced geomagnetic activity around the equinox.
At Earth’s magnetopause the KHI is primarily driven by a velocity shear aligned with the wave vector, . Any magnetic field component aligned with acts to stabilize the KHI. This stabilization is facilitated by magnetic tensions in the magnetosheath and magnetosphere, which are associated with the IMF and geomagnetic dipole field, respectively. The orientation of Earth’s magnetic dipole axis varies both seasonally and diurnally due to the combined effects of Earth’s orbit around the Sun (as seen in Figure 2) and the rotation of the magnetic dipole about Earth’s rotation axis. These variations introduce seasonal and diurnal fluctuations in the growth of the KHI by altering the intensity of the magnetic tension forces.
The tilt of Earth’s dipole axis towards or away from the sun modulates the magnetic tension due to the orientation of the magnetospheric field relative to the shear flow in the GSM-X-Y plane. At equinoxes, the dipole axis is aligned with the GSM-Z axis, perpendicular to the velocity, and the magnetospheric magnetic tension diminishes to 0. Consequently, the dipole field lines exert no stabilizing influence on the KHI and the probability of KHI occurrence increases. At solstices, when the dipole is at its maximum angle relative to the GSM-Z axis, the magnetospheric magnetic tension is also maximized and exerts more stabilizing force on the KHI, which decreases the probability of KHI occurrence. These effects have been confirmed in observations by
The dominance of the shear flow in the X direction suggests that the magnetosphere’s magnetic tension, influenced by the dipole’s tilt towards or away from the Sun, plays a significant role in stabilizing KHI. Consequently, the equinoctial effect exerts a significant influence on the seasonal and daily variations of KHI, as corroborated by KHI occurrence rate analysis in
4 Discussion and conclusion
As recounted here, recent advancements in observational and computational capabilities have expanded our understanding of the KHI as an active environment which influences and is influenced by processes across scales sizes. At kinetic scales, reconnection, diffusive transport, and wave activity contribute to enhanced plasma transport and heating. These small scale processes can also interrupt the development of KH vortices from linear to non-linear and rolled up stages. At global scales, the location and occurrence of KHI is modulated by IMF orientation and seasonal dipole tilt effects. The KHI contributes to the formation of the CDPS during northward IMF and its pronounced dawn-dusk asymmetry. Overall, the results summarized here paint a picture of the magnetopause not as a static boundary that is merely traversed by solar wind plasma, but as an active participant in the transfer of mass between the magnetosphere and solar wind, a process in which the KHI plays a significant role.
Questions still remain about the nature and development of the KHI. What are the origins of energetic particles within the KHI? How might geomagetic storm conditions affect the development of the KHI? What effects might heavy ion species have on the behavior of the KHI? What influence does the KHI exert throughout the heliosphere, such as at the edges of coronal mass ejections, co-rotating interaction regions, or other planetary magnetospheres? Evidence of KH activity has been observed at Mercury (
The above questions and our new understanding of the KHI as a multi-scale process should inform the direction of future research. New studies on the diffusive transport within the KH vortices should consider the multi-scale and multi-effect nature of the KHI rather than focusing on single effects and scales. Efforts should be made to relate the KHI to global parameters, such as the solar wind conditions and season, in order to obtain a global picture of the instability, its influences, and the implications for global solar wind transport. Simulation studies should consider the role of more realistic solar wind IMF orientations or the role of kinetic physics (e.g.,
Statements
Author contributions
RR: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KB: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KN: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SK: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. KS: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. Y-LL: Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Work by RCR is funded via MMS Early Career Grant #80NSSC23K1601. KB is supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P32175-N27. KN is supported by NASA LWS Grant #80NSSC23K0899. SK is funded by NSF award #2307203. KAS acknowledges support by the NASA DRIVE Science Center for Geospace Storms (CGS) under award 80NSSC22M0163 and NASA grants #80NSSC19K0241, #80NSSC20K1833, #80NSSC17K0679, and #80NSSC24K1106. Y-LL is funded by NASA LWS Grant #80NSSC23K0899 and NSF Grant #2308853. This review was supported by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, through ISSI International Team project #546 “Magnetohydrodynamic Surface Waves at Earth’s Magnetosphere (and Beyond).”
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AngelopoulosV. (2008). The THEMIS mission. Space Sci. Rev.141, 5–34. 10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1
2
AngelopoulosV.KennelC. F.CoronitiF. V.PellatR.KivelsonM. G.WalkerR. J.et al (1994). Statistical characteristics of bursty bulk flow events. J. Geophys. Res.99, 21257–21280. 10.1029/94JA01263
3
AxfordW. I.HinesC. O. (1961). A unifying theory of high latitude geophysical phenomena and geomagnetic storms. Can. J. Phys.39, 1433–1464. 10.1139/p61-172
4
BlaslK. A.NakamuraT. K. M.NakamuraR.SettinoA.HasegawaH.VörösZ.et al (2023). Electron-scale reconnecting current sheet formed within the lower-hybrid wave-active region of kelvin-helmholtz waves. Geophys. Rev. Lett.50, e2023GL104309. 10.1029/2023GL104309
5
BlaslK. A.NakamuraT. K. M.PlaschkeF.NakamuraR.HasegawaH.StawarzJ. E.et al (2022). Multi-scale observations of the magnetopause Kelvin–Helmholtz waves during southward IMF. Phys. Plasmas29, 012105. 10.1063/5.0067370
6
BowersK. J.AlbrightB. J.YinL.DaughtonW.RoytershteynV.BergenB.et al (2009) “Advances in petascale kinetic plasma simulation with VPIC and Roadrunner,” in Journal of physics conference series. 10.1088/1742-6596/180/1/012055012055
7
BurchJ. L.MooreT. E.TorbertR. B.GilesB. L. (2016a). Magnetospheric multiscale overview and science objectives. Space Sci. Rev.199, 5–21. 10.1007/s11214-015-0164-9
8
BurchJ. L.TorbertR. B.PhanT. D.ChenL.-J.MooreT. E.ErgunR. E.et al (2016b). Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space. Science352, aaf2939. 10.1126/science.aaf2939
9
BurkeW. J.KelleyM. C.SagalynR. C.SmiddyM.LaiS. T. (1979). Polar cap electric field structures with a northward interplanetary magnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett.6, 21–24. 10.1029/GL006i001p00021
10
BurkholderB. L.DelamereP. A.JohnsonJ. R.NgC.-S. (2020a). Identifying active kelvin–helmholtz vortices on saturn’s magnetopause boundary. Geophys. Res. Lett.47. 10.1029/2019GL084206
11
BurkholderB. L.NykyriK.MaX.RiceR.FuselierS. A.TrattnerK. J.et al (2020b). Magnetospheric multiscale observation of an electron diffusion region at high latitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett.47, e2020GL087268. 10.1029/2020GL087268
12
ChastonC. C.WilberM.FujimotoM.GoldsteinM. L.AcunaM.RémeH.et al (2007). Mode conversion and anomalous transport in kelvin-helmholtz vortices and kinetic alfvén waves at the earth’s magnetopause. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 175004. 10.1103/physrevlett.99.175004
13
DelamereP. A.NgC. S.DamianoP. A.NeupaneB. R.JohnsonJ. R.BurkholderB.et al (2021). Kelvin–helmholtz-related turbulent heating at saturn’s magnetopause boundary. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.126, e2020JA028479. 10.1029/2020JA028479
14
DialynasK. (2018). Cassini/mimi observations on the dungey cycle reconnection and kelvin-helmholtz instability in saturn’s magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.123, 7271–7275. 10.1029/2018JA025840
15
DungeyJ. W. (1961). Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones. Physcical6, 47–48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.47
16
ErikssonS.LavraudB.WilderF. D.StawarzJ. E.GilesB. L.BurchJ. L.et al (2016). Magnetospheric Multiscale observations of magnetic reconnection associated with Kelvin-Helmholtz waves. Geophys. Rev. Lett.43, 5606–5615. 10.1002/2016GL068783
17
EscoubetC. P.FehringerM.GoldsteinM. (2001). Introduction: the cluster mission. Ann. Geophys.19, 1197–1200. 10.5194/angeo-19-1197-2001
18
FaganelloM.CalifanoF.PegoraroF. (2008). Competing mechanisms of plasma transport in inhomogeneous configurations with velocity shear: the solar-wind interaction with earth’s magnetosphere. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 015001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.015001
19
FairfieldD. H.OttoA.MukaiT.KokubunS.LeppingR. P.SteinbergJ. T.et al (2000). Geotail observations of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the eqatorial magnetotail boundary for parallel northward fields. J. Geophys. Res.105, 21159–21174. 10.1029/1999JA000316
20
HasegawaA. (1976). Particle acceleration by mhd surface wave and formation of aurora. J. Geophys. Res.81, 5083–5090. 10.1029/ja081i028p05083
21
HenryZ. W.NykyriK.MooreT. W.DimmockA. P.MaX. (2017). On the dawn-dusk asymmetry of the kelvin-helmholtz instability between 2007 and 2013. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.122 (11), 888–11,900. 10.1002/2017JA024548
22
HwangK.-J.GoldsteinM. L.KuznetsovaM. M.WangY.VikasA. F.SibeckD. G. (2012). The first in situ observation of kelvin-helmholtz waves at high-latitude magnetopause during strongly dawnward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.117, 2156–2202. 10.1029/2011JA017256
23
HwangK.-J.KuznetsovaM. M.SahraouiF.GoldsteinM. L.LeeE.ParksG. K. (2011). Kelvin-Helmholtz waves under southward interplanetary magnetic field. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.116, A08210. 10.1029/2011JA016596
24
JohnsonJ. R.ChengC. (2001). Stochastic ion heating at the magnetopause due to kinetic alfvén waves. Geophys. Res. Lett.28, 4421–4424. 10.1029/2001gl013509
25
KavosiS.RaederJ. (2015). Ubiquity of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves at Earth/’s magnetopause. Nat. Commun.6, 7019. 10.1038/ncomms8019
26
KavosiS.ReaderJ.JohnsonJ. R.NykyriK.FarrugiaC. J. (2023). Seasonal and diurnal variations of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability at terrestrial magnetopause. Nat. Commun.14, 2513. 10.1038/s41467-023-37485-x
27
KimS.-H.AgrimsonE.MillerM. J.D’AngeloN.MerlinoR. L.GanguliG. I. (2004). Amplification of electrostatic ion-cyclotron waves in a plasma with magnetic-field-aligned ion flow shear and no electron current. Phys. plasmas11, 4501–4505. 10.1063/1.1780531
28
LembegeB.RatliffS.DawsonJ.OhsawaY. (1983). Ion heating and acceleration by strong magnetosonic waves. Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 264–267. 10.1103/physrevlett.51.264
29
LiS.-S.AngelopoulosV.RunovA.KiehasS. A.ZhouX.-Z. (2013). Plasmoid growth and expulsion revealed by two-point ARTEMIS observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.118, 2133–2144. 10.1002/jgra.50105
30
LiT.LiW.TangB.KhotyaintsevY. V.GrahamD. B.ArdakaniA.et al (2023). Kelvin-helmholtz waves and magnetic reconnection at the earth’s magnetopause under southward interplanetary magnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett.50, e2023GL105539. 10.1029/2023GL105539
31
LiW.AndréM.KhotyaintsevY. V.VaivadsA.GrahamD. B.Toledo-RedondoS.et al (2016). Kinetic evidence of magnetic reconnection due to Kelvin-Helmholtz waves. Geophys. Rev. Lett.43, 5635–5643. 10.1002/2016GL069192
32
MaX.DelamereP.OttoA.BurkholderB. (2017). Plasma transport driven by the three-dimensional kelvin-helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.122 (10), 10382–10395. 10.1002/2017JA024394
33
MaX.DelamereP. A.NykyriK.BurkholderB.NeupaneB.RiceR. C. (2019). Comparison between fluid simulation with test particles and hybrid simulation for the kelvin-helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.124, 6654–6668. 10.1029/2019JA026890
34
MaX.DelamereP. A.OttoA. (2016). Plasma transport driven by the Rayleigh-taylor instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.121, 5260–5271. 10.1002/2015JA022122
35
MaX.OttoA.DelamereP. A. (2014a). Interaction of magnetic reconnection and Kelvin-Helmholtz modes for large magnetic shear: 1. Kelvin-Helmholtz trigger. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.119, 781–797. 10.1002/2013JA019224
36
MaX.OttoA.DelamereP. A. (2014b). Interaction of magnetic reconnection and Kelvin-Helmholtz modes for large magnetic shear: 2. reconnection trigger. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.119, 808–820. 10.1002/2013JA019225
37
MaX.StaufferB.DelamereP. A.OttoA. (2015). Asymmetric kelvin-helmholtz propagation at saturn’s dayside magnetopause. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.120, 1867–1875. 10.1002/2014JA020746
38
MatsumotoY.HoshinoM. (2004). Onset of turbulence induced by a Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex. Geophys. Rev. Lett.31, L02807. 10.1029/2003GL018195
39
MiuraA. (1987). Simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetospheric boundary. J. Geophys. Res.92, 3195–3206. 10.1029/JA092iA04p03195
40
MontgomeryJ.EbertR. W.AllegriniF.BagenalF.BoltonS. J.DiBraccioG. A.et al (2023). Investigating the occurrence of kelvin-helmholtz instabilities at jupiter’s dawn magnetopause. Geophys. Res. Lett.50. 10.1029/2023GL102921
41
MooreT. W.NykyriK.DimmockA. P. (2016). Cross-scale energy transport in space plasmas. Nat. Phys.12, 1164–1169. 10.1038/NPHYS3869
42
MooreT. W.NykyriK.DimmockA. P. (2017). Ion-scale wave properties and enhanced ion heating across the low-latitude boundary layer during kelvin-helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.122, 11,128–11,153. 10.1002/2017JA024591
43
NakamuraT. K.HayashiD.FujimotoM.ShinoharaI. (2004). Decay of MHD-scale kelvin-helmholtz vortices mediated by parasitic electron dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 145001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.145001
44
NakamuraT. K. M.BlaslK. A.HasegawaH.UmedaT.LiuY. H.PeeryS. A.et al (2022a). Multi-scale evolution of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves at the Earth’s magnetopause during southward IMF periods. Phys. Plasmas29, 012901. 10.1063/5.0067391
45
NakamuraT. K. M.BlaslK. A.LiuY. H.PeeryS. A. (2022b). Diffusive plasma transport by the magnetopause Kelvin-Helmholtz instability during southward IMF. Front. Astronomy Space Sci.8. 10.3389/fspas.2021.809045
46
NishinoM.FujimotoM.UenoG.MaezawaK.MukaiT.SaitoY. (2007). Geotail observations of two-component protons in the midnight plasma sheet. Ann. Geophys. Copernic. Publ. Göttingen, Ger.25, 2229–2245. 10.5194/angeo-25-2229-2007
47
NykyriK. (2013). Impact of MHD shock physics on magnetosheath asymmetry and Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.118, 5068–5081. 10.1002/jgra.50499
48
NykyriK.GrisonB.CargillP.LavraudB.LucekE.DandourasI.et al (2006a). Origin of the turbulent spectra in the high-altitude cusp: cluster spacecraft observations. Ann. Geophys. Copernic. GmbH24, 1057–1075. 10.5194/angeo-24-1057-2006
49
NykyriK.LucekP. J. C. E. A.HorburyT. S.BaloghA.LavraudB.DandourasI.et al (2003a). Ion cyclotron waves in the high altitude cusp: CLUSTER observations at varying spacecraft separations. Geophys. Res. Lett.30. 10.1029/2003GL018594
50
NykyriK.MaX.BurkholderB.RiceR.JohnsonJ.KimE.-K.et al (2021a). MMS observations of the multi-scale wave structures and parallel electron heating in the vicinity of the southern exterior cusp. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.126. 10.1029/2019JA027698
51
NykyriK.MaX.JohnsonJ. (2021b). Cross-scale energy transport in space plasmas. Am. Geophys. Union AGU, 109–121. chap. 7. 10.1002/9781119815624.ch7
52
NykyriK.OttoA. (2001). Plasma transport at the magnetospheric boundary due to reconnection in Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices. Geophys. Res. Lett.28, 3565–3568. 10.1029/2001GL013239
53
NykyriK.OttoA. (2004). Influence of the Hall term on KH instability and reconnection inside kh vortices. Ann. Geophys.22, 935–949. 10.5194/angeo-22-935-2004
54
NykyriK.OttoA.BüchnerJ.NikutowskiB.BaumjohannW.KistlerL. M.et al (2003b). Equator-S observations of boundary signatures: FTE’s orKelvin-Helmholtz waves?Wash. D.C. Am. Geophys. Union Geophys. Monogr. Ser.133, 205–210. 10.1029/133GM20
55
NykyriK.OttoA.LavraudB.MouikisC.KistlerL.BaloghA.et al (2006b). Cluster observations of reconnection due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the dawn side magnetospheric flank. Ann. Geophys.24, 2619–2643. 10.5194/angeo-24-2619-2006
56
OierosetM.RaederJ.PhanT. D.WingS.McFaddenJ. P.LiW.et al (2005). Global cooling and densification of the plasma sheet during an extended period of purely northward IMF on October 22–24, 2003. Geophys. Res. Lett.32. 10.1029/2004GL021523
57
OsmaneA.DimmockA. P.NaderpourR.PulkkinenT. I.NykyriK. (2015). The impact of solar wind ULFBzfluctuations on geomagnetic activity for viscous timescales during strongly northward and southward IMF. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.120, 9307–9322. 10.1002/2015JA021505
58
OttoA.FairfieldD. H. (2000). Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetotail boundary: MHD simulation and comparison with Geotail observations. J. Geophys. Res.105, 21175–21190. 10.1029/1999ja000312
59
ParalJ.RankinR. (2013). Dawn–dusk asymmetry in the kelvin–helmholtz instability at mercury. Nat. Commun.4, 1645. 10.1038/ncomms2676
60
PaschmannG.PapamastorakisI.SckopkeN.HaerendelG.SonnerupB. U. O.BameS. J.et al (1979). Plasma acceleration at the earth’s magnetopause - evidence for reconnection. Nature282, 243–246. 10.1038/282243a0
61
PeñanoJ. R.GanguliG. (2002). Generation of electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves in the ionosphere by localized transverse dc electric fields. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.107, 14–17. 10.1029/2001JA000279
62
PohG.EspleyJ. R.NykyriK.FowlerC. M.MaX.XuS.et al (2021). On the growth and development of non-linear kelvin–helmholtz instability at mars: maven observations. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.126. 10.1029/2021JA029224
63
RanquistD. A.BagenalF.WilsonR. J.HospodarskyG.EbertR. W.AllegriniF.et al (2019). Survey of jupiter’s dawn magnetosheath using juno. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.124, 9106–9123. 10.1029/2019JA027382
64
RiceR. C.NykyriK.MaX.BurkholderB. L. (2022). Characteristics of kelvin–helmholtz waves as observed by the mms from september 2015 to march 2020. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.127. 10.1029/2021JA029685
65
RuhunusiriS.HalekasJ. S.McFaddenJ. P.ConnerneyJ. E. P.EspleyJ. R.HaradaY.et al (2016). Maven observations of partially developed kelvin-helmholtz vortices at mars. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 4763–4773. 10.1002/2016GL068926
66
SettinoA.MalaraF.PezziO.OnofriM.PerroneD.ValentiniF. (2020). Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at proton scales with an exact kinetic equilibrium. Astrophysical J.901, 17. 10.3847/1538-4357/abada9
67
SettinoA.PerroneD.KhotyaintsevY. V.GrahamD. B.ValentiniF. (2021). Kinetic features for the identification of kelvin-helmholtz vortices in in situ observations. Astrophysical J.912, 154. 10.3847/1538-4357/abf1f5
68
SorathiaK. A.MerkinV. G.UkhorskiyA. Y.AllenR. C.NykyriK.WingS. (2019). Solar wind ion entry into the magnetosphere during northward imf. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.124, 5461–5481. 10.1029/2019JA026728
69
Sorriso-ValvoL.CatapanoF.RetinòA.Le ContelO.PerroneD.RobertsO. W.et al (2019). Turbulence-driven ion beams in the magnetospheric kelvin-helmholtz instability. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 035102. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.035102
70
StawarzJ. E.ErikssonS.WilderF. D.ErgunR. E.SchwartzS. J.PouquetA.et al (2016). Observations of turbulence in a kelvin-helmholtz event on 8 september 2015 by the magnetospheric multiscale mission. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.121, 11,021–11,034. 10.1002/2016JA023458
71
TaylorM. G. G. T.HasegawaH.LavraudB.PhanT.EscoubetC. P.DunlopM. W.et al (2012). Spatial distribution of rolled up Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices at Earth’s dayside and flank magnetopause. Ann. Geophys.30, 1025–1035. 10.5194/angeo-30-1025-2012
72
TerasawaT.NambuM. (1989). Ion heating and acceleration by magnetosonic waves via cyclotron subharmonic resonance. Geophys. Res. Lett.16, 357–360. 10.1029/gl016i005p00357
73
WangX.XuX.YeY.WangJ.WangM.ZhouZ.et al (2022). Maven observations of the kelvin-helmholtz instability developing at the ionopause of mars. Geophys. Res. Lett.49. 10.1029/2022GL098673
74
WilderF.ErgunR.SchwartzS.NewmanD.ErikssonS.StawarzJ.et al (2016). Observations of large-amplitude, parallel, electrostatic waves associated with the kelvin-helmholtz instability by the magnetospheric multiscale mission. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 8859–8866. 10.1002/2016gl070404
75
WingS.JohnsonJ. R.ChastonC. C.EchimM.EscoubetC. P.LavraudB.et al (2014). Review of solar wind entry into and transport within the plasma sheet. Space Sci. Rev.184, 33–86. 10.1007/s11214-014-0108-9
76
WingS.JohnsonJ. R.NewellP. T.MengC.-I. (2005). Dawn-dusk asymmetries, ion spectra, and sources in the northward interplanetary magnetic field plasma sheet. J. Geophys. Res.110. 10.1029/2005JA011086
77
ZhangJ.CoffeyV. N.ChandlerM. O.BoardsenS. A.SaikinA. A.MelloE. M.et al (2017). Properties, propagation, and excitation of emic waves observed by mms: a case study. Marshall Space Flight Center Faculty Fellowship Program, 213.
Summary
Keywords
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, plasma transport, reconnection, multi-scale processes, diffusive transport, turbulence
Citation
Rice RC, Blasl KA, Nykyri K, Kavosi S, Sorathia KA and Liou Y-L (2024) Multi-scale processes of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at Earth’s magnetopause. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 11:1464010. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2024.1464010
Received
12 July 2024
Accepted
27 August 2024
Published
16 September 2024
Volume
11 - 2024
Edited by
Michel Blanc, UMR5277 Institut de recherche en astrophysique et planétologie (IRAP), France
Reviewed by
Binbin Ni, Wuhan University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Rice, Blasl, Nykyri, Kavosi, Sorathia and Liou.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rachel C. Rice, rcrice@umd.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.