ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1569748

This article is part of the Research TopicInfections in the Intensive Care Unit - Volume IIIView all 18 articles

Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Predictive Model for 28-Day Mortality in ICU Patients with Bloodstream Infections: A Cohort Study

Provisionally accepted
Jun  JinJun Jin1,2Lei  YuLei Yu1Qingshan  ZhouQingshan Zhou1Qian  DuQian Du1Xiangrong  NieXiangrong Nie1Haiyan  YinHaiyan Yin2*Wanjie  GuWanjie Gu2*
  • 1The university of hong kong-Shenzhen hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 2Department of Intensive Care Unit, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a leading cause of sepsis and death in intensive care unit (ICU). Traditional severity scores, including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), exhibit limitations in effectively predicting mortality among BSI patients, primarily due to their reliance on a narrow range of clinical variables. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive nomogram model for 28-day all-cause mortality prediction in BSI patients.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 3,615 patients with positive blood cultures from the MIMIC-IV database, divided into training (n=2,532) and validation (n=1,083) cohorts. Through a two-step variable selection process combining LASSO regression and Boruta algorithm, we identified 12 predictive variables from 58 initial clinical parameters. The model's performance was evaluated using AUROC, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: The nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination (AUROC: 0.760 vs. 0.671, P<0.001 for SOFA; 0.760 vs. 0.705, P<0.001 for APSIII; 0.760 vs. 0.707, P<0.001 for SAPS II) in the training cohort, with consistent performance in the validation cohort (AUROC: 0.742). Key predictors identified in our model included the need for mechanical ventilation, the presence of malignancy, platelet count, and scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The model showed significant improvements in NRI and IDI, with consistent net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities in DCA.Conclusions: This study developed and validated a predictive model for 28-day mortality in BSI patients that demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional severity scores. By integrating clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related variables, the model provides a more comprehensive approach to risk stratification. These findings highlight its potential for improving early identification of high-risk patients and guiding clinical decision-making, though further prospective validation is needed to confirm its generalizability.

Keywords: bloodstream infections, predictive model, nomogram, 28-day all-cause mortality, Sepsis, Intensive Care Unit, MIMICIV database

Received: 01 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jin, Yu, Zhou, Du, Nie, Yin and Gu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Haiyan Yin, Department of Intensive Care Unit, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Wanjie Gu, Department of Intensive Care Unit, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.