Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Clin. Diabetes Healthc.

Sec. Diabetes Self-Management

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2025.1589548

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Benefits of Digital Health Technologies in Diabetes ManagementView all 9 articles

Impact of Digital Health on Type 2 Diabetes Management: a randomised controlled trial of the 'TreC Diabete' Platform (TELEMECHRON Study) Digital health in managing type 2 diabetes

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia Autonoma di Trento (APSS), Trento, Italy
  • 2TrentinoSalute4.0, Competence Center for Digital Health, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Italy, Trento, Italy
  • 3Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK ), Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The use of technologies in the health field has progressively increased. Within the context of a broader project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (TELEMECHRON study), a randomised controlled trial (RCT) has been conducted in the Autonomous Province of Trento on type 2 diabetes individuals with an untargeted glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level.The overall aim was to evaluate the impact of the "TreC Diabete" digital platform, including a smartphone application (app) and a dashboard. This open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 allocation ratio RCT in which the intervention group used the app for data entry, symptoms questionnaire, communication with healthcare staff and medication recording, while the control group received standard care. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c levels at 12 months between groups.Results: Between December 2022 and August 2023, 103 participants were enrolled (51 intervention; 52 control), with a median age of 67 years old, time from diabetes diagnosis to enrolment 13 years, and 72% male.At 12 months, the median change in HbA1c levels did not differ significantly between groups. Regarding app usage, data entries decreased significantly from the first quarter to the second quarter but subsequently stabilised (p = 0.001). System usability (from 42 responders in the intervention group) had a median score of 95 (range: 0-100), indicating a high level of satisfaction with the platform.The study faced several challenges, including platform technical issues, service interruption, data entry anomalies and difficulties in participant recruitment. Study generalisability may be limited by the sample's demographics, as the trial predominantly included younger male individuals with a specific HbA1c level.The study highlighted key factors for future implementations, including understanding technology benefits, addressing adoption barriers, and providing education and support to both patients and healthcare providers.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes, metabolic control, Randomised controlled trial, mHealth, Telemedicine, Digital Health

Received: 07 Mar 2025; Accepted: 20 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Giovanazzi, Gios, Gentilini, Mastellaro, Bartolotta, Nicolussi Giacomaz, Eccher and Inchiostro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Alexia Giovanazzi, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia Autonoma di Trento (APSS), Trento, Italy
Sandro Inchiostro, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia Autonoma di Trento (APSS), Trento, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.