ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Clin. Diabetes Healthc.
Sec. Diabetes Self-Management
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2025.1665240
A call to combat the burden of Allergic Contact Dermatitis among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus using medical adhesives: a cross-sectional observational study
Provisionally accepted- 1College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health,, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- 2Strategy & Institutional Excellence, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- 3Dubai Diabetes Center, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The increasing prevalence of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D) has led to the development of advanced technologies such as Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) and insulin infusion pumps. These devices rely on adhesives to attached to the skin, which can trigger Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) in some individuals. Despite their growing use, data on ACD prevalence among children/adolescents with T1D using adhesive-based medical devices in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region remains limited. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ACD in children/adolescents with T1D using CGMs in the UAE, and evaluate the association between device use and ACD. It also explored trends in immune-related comorbidities that could impact glycemic control. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in collaboration with Dubai Diabetes Center (DDC). Medical records of 232 children/adolescents with T1D , receiving care at DDC between January 2020 and January 2023, were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate proportions, and ACD prevalence was determined with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using Poisson distribution. Fisher’s exact test was applied to explore associations between categorical variables. Results: Among 232 study individuals, 87% (202 out of 232 individuals) used smart medical devices for glucose monitoring. Of these, 16 had a documented history of ACD, indicating a prevalence rate of 7.92% (95% CI: 4.6, 12.54). No statistically significant association was found between smart devices use and ACD development (p-value = 0.581). ACD prevalence was higher among females using adhesives (9.37%) compared to their male counterparts (6.6%). Conclusion: This study aligns with United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 by highlighting ACD prevalence among children/adolescents with T1D using CGMs in the UAE. It underscores the need for biomedical manufacturers disclose adhesive chemical compositions to facilitate the development of safer alternatives. Additionally, healthcare professionals should be educated on dermatological risks associated with adhesive-based devices, enabling them to provide more comprehensive care and improve individual outcomes.
Keywords: type 1 diabetes mellitus, Allergic contact dermatitis, Medical adhesive, PediatricDiabetes, adverse effects, Public Health, Sustainable development goals
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alsuwaidi, Kanj, Rowaiaee, Kanj, Otaki, Otypi and Bejjani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Laila Alsuwaidi, laila.alsuwaidi@mbru.ac.ae
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.