ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Media Governance and the Public Sphere
Discursive Polarization Sustains Contested Statehood: Positive Self and Negative Other in the Kosovo–Serbia Conflict
Provisionally accepted
- 1Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- 2Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This article examines how political elites in Kosovo and Serbia employ rhetorical polarization to establish legitimacy amid disputed statehood. This study analyzes 180 quotes of political leaders published in international media spanning 2012 to 2020, using keyword frequency analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis within van Dijk's socio-cognitive framework (text–cognition–society) to explore how positive self-representations and negative portrayals of others influence the conflict narrative. Serbian discourse often uses delegitimizing terms like "so-called state" and "illegal," while Kosovo's rhetoric emphasizes themes of recognition and sovereignty. Both sides advocate for peace and stability while accusing each other of fueling insecurity. Although justice and victimhood are important, they are less prominent, with Kosovo stressing accountability for war crimes and missing persons, and Serbia casting itself as a guardian of minorities. International alliances have further sharpened the division between the two countries; Kosovo supports the EU and NATO, while Serbia references the UN, Russia, and China. This research contributes theoretically by applying the ideological square to recognition conflicts; methodologically, by combining quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis; and empirically, by providing enriched insights by situating the Kosovo–Serbia dialogue within broader discussions of contested sovereignty. The corpus reveals cross-actor convergence and shared ideological grammar with findings showing a shift from procedural to moral–affective legitimation and a pattern of mirror polarization across Kosovo and Serbia. Given that ongoing discursive polarization hinders conflict resolution, the findings underscore the need for mediation efforts to focus on shared values rather than zero-sum claims.
Keywords: conflict, contested statehood, critical discourse analysis, discourse, Ideological square, Kosovo, Legitimacy, Serbia
Received: 15 Sep 2025; Accepted: 14 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Cerkini and Tenbrink. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Krenare Cerkini
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.