Abstract
Plant functional traits are fundamental to the understanding of plant adaptations and distributions. Recently, scientists proposed a trait-based species selection theory to support the selection of suitable plant species to restore the degraded ecosystems, to prevent the invasive exotic species and to manage the sustainable ecosystems. Based on this theory, in a previous study, we developed a species screening model and successfully applied it to a project where plant species were selected for restoring a tropical coral island. However, during this process we learned that a software platform is necessary to automate the selection process because it can flexible to assist users. Here, we developed a generalized software platform called the “Restoration Plant Species Selection (RPSS) Platform.” This flexible software is designed to assist users in selecting plant species for particular purposes (e.g., restore the degraded ecosystems and others). It is written in R language and integrated with external R packages, including the packages that computing similarity indexes, providing graphic outputs, and offering web functions. The software has a web-based graphical user interface that allows users to execute required functions via checkboxes and buttons. The platform has cross-platform functionality, which means that it can run on all common operating systems (e.g., Windows, Linux, macOS, and others). We also illustrate a successful case study in which the software platform was used to select suitable plant species for restoration purpose. The objective of this paper is to introduce the newly developed software platform RPSS and to provide useful guidances on using it for various applications. At this step, we also realized that the software platform should be constantly updated (e.g., add new features) in the future. Based on the existing successful application and the possible updates, we believe that our RPSS software platform will have broader applications in the future.
Introduction
Climate change and human activities (e.g., ore mining and agricultural use) have caused the land ecosystem degraded worldwide (). These degraded ecosystems are known to seriously affect human economic and social life (; ). As such, ecological restoration has rapidly developed to solve the urgent and complex degraded problems (; ). Among all, identifying the suitable species that can successfully restore the degraded ecosystems is the primary challenge in restoration science (). However, this step requires a comprehensive understanding of the ecological restoration theory, including information on species interactions, successional processes, and resource-use patterns. Because these processes differ greatly across different ecosystems, it remains an enormous challenge. As this type of information is typically lacking, the selection of candidate species for restoration purposes are typically chosen using traditional trial-and-error method. Nevertheless, the trial-and-error method based largely on expert knowledge of the ecosystem (), and such information requires the involvement of a restoration practitioner who has a wealth of practical experience which is based on years of training (; ).
Plant functional traits (including morphological, physiological and phenological characteristics that are linked to plant life history strategies) are fundamental to understanding plant adaptations and distributions. In theory, plant functional traits can be useful for selecting suitable species to restore degraded ecosystems by computing the similarity index between the target species (e.g., species have been proved to have high survival rates in the degraded ecosystems) and the potential species (e.g., all possible suitable species) (; ). Several studies have successfully used functional traits to select suitable plant species for restoring degraded ecosystems (; ; ; ; ; ). However, each of these studies used different screening methods or different sets of functional traits to select species. A generalized framework and a software platform which can assist this selection process is necessary to people which are new to this field.
Recently, proposed a quantitative trait-based species selection process for selecting suitable species to restore degraded ecosystems. In a previous study (), we developed a species screening model based on this quantitative trait-based theory (). Also, we successfully applied this model to select best fit plant species for restoring a tropical coral island which is part of Hainan Island, China (). However, along this way we realized that a software platform which can help automate this modeling process is necessary as it will save time for beginners.
In this study, we introduced a newly developed, web-based species selection software platform and named it as “Restoration Plant Species Selection (RPSS) Platform.” The platform aims to select suitable plant species for restoration purpose based on plant functional traits. It was developed using the high-level R programming language1 which is popular for statistical computing and graphics. It is a web-based application that can run on a wide variety of operating systems, like Windows, Linux, and macOS and it can work based on various general browsers (e.g., IE, Chrome, Firefox, and others). The software platform makes use of several external R packages that perform various functions, including computing similarity rankings and drawing multiple graphic functions. For users, there are only two sets of information needed to run the software: (1) the trait values of the target species (species which proved to meet the specific goals) and (2) the trait values of the potential species (species to be chosen from). In addition, the RPSS platform also has a graphic user interface that helps users execute each of the functions.
Trait-Based Plant Species Selection Process
In this section, we will introduce the abiotic filtering theory which is the key selection theory for our software platform, and the trait-based plant species selection process in details.
Abiotic Filtering Theory
Abiotic filtering theory claims that for adapting well to the limiting abiotic environment (e.g., light and soil nutrient), all species have to develop similar traits to optimize fitness and performance (). If we have found at least one or two species that can adapt well to the specific environment in the degraded ecosystem, many species that are appropriate for restoring the degraded ecosystem can easily be selected, as long as we compare the similarities in functional traits among them.
The Trait-Based Plant Species Selection Process
Step 1. Determine the Target Species
The target species are needed as a prerequisite in this process. Generally, the target species are species that have met certain standards of durability in ecosystems. For restoration purposes, the target species are which we already know have high survival rates in the degraded ecosystems. However, in some cases, the restoration is initiated from bare soil conditions which means that the target species are not easily found based on poor background knowledge. We therefore use the traditional trial-and-error method to determine them ().
Step 2. Prepare the Pool of Potential Species
Potential species pool consists all the possible plant species which may be suitable for our specific purposes. For restoration purposes, the potential species pool should include both historical native species and non-native species that have the potential to restore the degraded ecosystems. The non-native species are which found in regions that have similar environments with the study site (). However, in some cases, native species or non-native species are not easily found. For example, the study site may be located on a highly degraded island on which almost no native plants can be found. In such situations, only non-native species will be considered for the potential species pool.
Step 3. Select the Appropriate Functional Traits That Can Capture the Key Characteristics of the Particular Purpose
The selected functional traits should capture the key characteristics of the degraded ecosystems’ environmental conditions. For example, leaf turgor loss point should be measured to reflect plant resistance to the drought stress, if drought stress is a key characteristic for the degraded ecosystem. Additionally, the appropriate traits should be well measurable for laboratories. If there is not any information on the characteristics already, the users may try to measure all possible functional traits (e.g., commonly measured morphological and physiological traits). We focused on different species that expressed similar trait values that were relevant to our objectives.
Step 4. Collect and Prepare Functional Trait Dataset
All trait information was obtained from field observations and laboratory measurements. Many previous studies have addressed how to collect and measure the functional traits. For the detailed information of how to prepare the functional trait dataset, please refer to some previous studies (; ) and Supplementary Tables 2,3 in the Supplementary Materials.
Step 5. Use Functional Traits to Select the Best Fit Species
In our software platform, the maximum entropy (Maxent) model () was used to screen plant species that are most functionally similar to the target species. The model outputs relative abundances to screen suitable species from the potential species pool. We defined relative abundance as the index of similarity between the target species and the potential species. The larger the value of similarity index, the more ecologically similar the two species are, and vice versa. Using this index, we assumed that the most similar species to the target species was also the most suitable species for restoring the degraded ecosystems.
Step 6. Monitor Seedling Survival of the Selected Plant Species
At the final step, the survival rates of the selected species should be monitored to check (1) if they have the high survival rates than the unselected species; and (2) if they have the comparable survival rates to the target species. If both requirements are met, that means our species screening process is succeed.
Overview of the Plant Species Selection Platform
In this study, we developed a web-based software platform named “Restoration Plant Species Selection (RPSS) Platform” to aid in the trait-based plant species selection process. The RPSS platform is written in R language, and the main page of the platform is shown in Figure 1. The user only needs to prepare trait values for the target and potential species in text format (see data examples in Supplementary Tables 2,3) when using the software platform. The software outputs both text and figure results of similarity rankings for each potential plant species, ranked from highest to lowest. The returned similarity index can indicate the similarity rank of each candidate plant species to target species. To establish the whole functions of the platform, we make use of numerous external R packages to perform various functions. For example, the FactoMineR package2 is used to perform the PCA analysis, the FD package3 (; ; ) is used to compute the similarity rankings based on the Maxent model (), the ggplot2 package4 is used for graphic outputs, and the shiny package5 helps accomplish the web functions. The software is open source. Anyone who needs the software can contact the corresponding author to acquire the whole software platform.
FIGURE 1
An Illustration of Using the “Restoration Plant Species Selection (RPSS)” Platform to Solve a Restoration Problem
Problem Description
In this section, we illustrate how to use our RPSS software platform successfully selects suitable plant species to restore a degraded ecosystem. Our study site is located in a tropical coral island which is part of Hainan Island, China. Because of multiple harsh environmental characteristics (e.g., high temperatures, strong light, drought, no soil, and other harsh conditions) (; ), it is difficult for plants to establish and grow in this area. For human habitation and economic development, restoration of the vegetation on this island is important and urgent. Plantations of some species are considered a quick way to vegetate the island and make the island suitable for the development of plant communities native to the region (; ). The objective of this section is to use our newly developed software platform to select suitable plant species that could be used to restore the degraded ecosystem of this area. Specifically, this island can be comparable to primary succession, as it is only made of rock and sand and does not have any soil for plants to colonize. If finally, the species selected by our software platform can indeed be suitable for restoring this extremely degraded island, we believe that our software can be widely used for restoring multiple different types of degraded ecosystems.
Study Site
Our study site is located in a tropical coral island which lays to the southern of Hainan Island (lying between 108°37′—111°03′ E and 18°10′—20°10′ N), China. The study site has an area of approximately 1 km2 and the mean altitude is about 5 meters ().
The coral island our study site located has a tropical monsoon oceanic climate with a mean annual temperature of 28°C. The average annual precipitation on the island is about 2,800 mm, and most precipitation occurs between April and September. The adverse environments in this study site are characterized by high temperatures, intense light, drought and high salinity and alkalinity soil, in which it is difficult for plants to colonize and grow (). For human habitation and economic development, developing successful restoration management strategies for this area is exceedingly important.
Selecting Target and Potential Species
As described earlier, the trait-based species screening process requires target species as a baseline. However, our restoration is initiated from bare soil condition which no native plants can be found. Only the traditional trial-and-error method can be used to acquire the target species. So, we have identified 20 species on a nearby island with similar environmental conditions to the study site. These species were cultivated (watering and fertilizing) in Wenchang City, Hainan Island for 1–3 months and then transplanted to the study site. Three years later (from the year 2014 to 2017), target species were defined as those with survival rates >90% based on trial-and-error method. Ultimately, three species Scaevola sericea, Ipomoea pes-caprae, and Cynodon dactylon‘Yangjiang’ were selected as target species for trees, vines, and herbs (; ; ).
In order to prepare the potential species pool for restoring the degraded coral island, we reviewed literatures and studied surveys of plants in four tropical regions which the climatic and environmental conditions are similar to our study site in global. The four regions are the South China Sea Islands, the South Pacific Islands/Hawaii, the Indian Ocean Islands, and the Caribbean Sea Islands. At last, 66 species were selected to form the potential species pool. These species included a wide range of plant groups containing trees, shrubs, herbs, vines, legumes, semi-mangrove plants, and some medicinal and edible plants. The list of the 66 candidate species is shown in Supplementary Table 1 (). The seedlings of these potential species were cultivated mainly including watering and fertilizing in Wenchang City, Hainan Island.
Species’ Functional Traits
We want to find out key traits that can assist plant species adapt well to the specific environments of the degraded ecosystem. Thus, the traits will help to select suitable species to restore this place well. Based on our previous studies (; ), we identified 28 traits that associated with the harsh environmental conditions on the tropical coral island. The selected functional traits are relate to drought resistance, resource allocation, antioxidant and photosynthetic capacity: specific leaf area (g/cm2), leaf water conductance (mmol m-2 s-1 MPa-1), leaf dry matter content (%), stomatal conductance (mmol m–2 s–1), stomatal density (numbers mm–2), upper epidermic thickness (μm), palisade tissue (μm); spongy tissue (μm), lower epidermic thickness (μm), maximum photosynthetic rate (mol m–2 s–1), stomatal conductance (mmol m–2 s–1), instantaneous water use efficiency (μmol mol–1), transpiration rate (mol m–2 s–1) and others. The 28 selected key traits are listed in Table 1. Because we don’t have enough fresh herb leaf samples, some leaf related traits were not able to measure for herb species. As a result, we only measured 19 traits for herbs, but 28 traits for wood species. The omitted nine leaf structure-related traits are leaf/palisade/spongy tissue thickness, palisade tissue width, upper epidermis thickness, guard cell length, stomatal density, and stomatal area index. For three target species, only Cynodon dactylon‘Yangjiang’ had measured 19 traits while others all had 28 traits. Among all 66 potential species, 6 species had only 19 traits, others had 28 traits. For the selected target and potential species, traits on mature and healthy leaves of ten individuals for each species in a growing season were measured. The measurement methods and trait dataset can be available in the supporting files.
TABLE 1
| Leaf trait category | Trait | Abbreviation | Unit | Ecological relevance |
| Structural traits | Leaf/Palisade/Spongy tissue thickness | LT/PT/ST | μm | Radiation and drought tolerance |
| Leaf palisade/spongy tissue thickness ratio | PST | / | Radiation and drought tolerance | |
| Palisade tissue width | PW | μm | Radiation and drought tolerance | |
| Upper epidermis thickness | UE | μm | Radiation and drought tolerance | |
| Leaf dry mater content | LDMC | mg g–1 | Nutrient acquisition and retention of resources | |
| Specific leaf area | SLA | cm2 g–1 | Resource capture and environment adaptability | |
| Leaf area | LA | cm2 | Water retention and drought tolerance | |
| Guard cell length | SL | μm | Water retention and drought tolerance | |
| Stomatal density | SD | n mm2 | Water retention and drought tolerance | |
| Stomatal area index | SPI | % | Photosynthesis and evaporation intensity | |
| Biochemical traits | Total antioxidant capacity | AOC | U g–1 | Antioxidant capacity |
| Superoxide dismutase activity | SOD | U g–1 | Antioxidant capacity | |
| Peroxidase activity | POD | U g–1 | Antioxidant capacity | |
| Catalase activity | CAT | U g–1 | Antioxidant capacity | |
| Total phenolics content | TP | mg g–1 | Antioxidant capacity | |
| Water soluble protein | CPR | mg g–1 | Osmotic adjustment and nutrient retention | |
| Malondialdehyde content | MDA | nmol g–1 | Lipid peroxidation degree | |
| Proline content | PRO | μg g–1 | Osmotic adjustment | |
| Chlorophyll a/ Chlorophyll b/ Total chlorophyll content | CHLa/ CHLb/ CHLt | mg g–1 | Light capture and photosynthetic capacity | |
| Hydraulic traits | Leaf hydraulic conductance | Kleaf | mmol s–1 m–2 MPa–1 | Water retention and acquisition capacity |
| Gas exchange traits | Maximum photosynthetic rate | Amax | μmol m–2 s–1 | Photosynthetic capacity |
| Stomatal conductivity | gs | mol m–2 s–1 | Stomatal adjustment and water retention | |
| Instantaneous water use efficiency | WUEi | μmol mol–1 | Leaf carbon and water utilization capacity | |
| Transpiration rate | E | mmol m–2 s–1 | Leaf water utilization |
Descriptions of the selected plant traits and abbreviations used in this study.
Sources and physiological functions are also shown.
Results of the Plant Species Selection Process
We input the trait values of target and potential species into the RPSS platform, the input file format can be found in Supplementary Tables 2,3. The software returned the final screening results in both text and graphic formats. In this case study, we used the Windows operating system and Google Chrome browser to accomplish the whole analysis process. The example graphic results are shown in Figures 2–4. For the target species Scaevola sericea, four plant species (Artocarpus heterophyllus, Pluchea indica, Hibiscus tiliaceus, and Ficus microcarpa) were selected as the potential species. For target species Ipomoea pes-caprae, six plant species (Ipomoea tuba, Pluchea indica, Pandanus tectorius, Hibiscus tiliaceus, Medicago sativa, and Sesuvium portulacastrum) were screened to be more similar to the target species. For target species Cynodon dactylon‘Yangjiang,’ four plant species (Spinifex littoreus, Lepturus repens, Miscanthus sinensis, and Cerbera manghas) were outperformed than others. After removing duplicate species, we selected a total of 12 species for vegetation restoration in this study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
Finally, we monitored seedling survival for all species in order to test (1) whether the selected species had the comparable survival rates with the target species; and (2) whether the selected species had higher survival rates than the unselected species. We cultivated 1,000 seedlings for each species in a nursery in Wenchang city, Hainan Island, China. In July 2017, we transplanted seedlings from our nursery to the tropical island. Each plant was planted on the same substrate type, and each row was divided into three repeat planting areas. The planting density was maintained at 80–100 plants per hectare. We recorded each plant’s annual growth rates. After 2 years’ follow-up, we recorded the final survival rate for each species using the following formula:
In final results, comparably high survival rates were found among the three target species and the twelve selected species (about 86 to 94%). However, the survival rates of the non-selected species were significantly lower than the target species in all cases (see Supplementary Figure 1). The results showed that the species selected by our software platform had significantly better survival rates than the non-selected species. This means that the software platform successfully performed the species selection for the purpose of restoration in our study site.
Conclusion
In this study, we introduce a newly developed web-based species screening software platform – the RPSS platform. It uses a trait-based framework to select suitable plant species for particular purposes (e.g., restore the degraded ecosystem and others). The software is implemented in the high-level R language and uses some external R packages (e.g., FD package, ggplot2 package, and shiny package) to realize the model calculations, the picture productions, and the web functions. The GUI equipped in the software allows an easy execution of purposed analyses. Because it is a web-based platform, it can run across different operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS. Compare with other similar work (e.g., Restoring Ecosystem Services Tool, REST, ), our software is a web-based platform which don’t need to install any programs on the local computer. In addition, our RPSS platform not only equipped with a web-based GUI to facilitate execution of various functions, it can also run as a script program in R language batch mode. Thus, users can clearly see which commands are executed, so as to better understand the science nature behind the plant species screening process.
We demonstrated a successful application of this software platform for selecting suitable species to restore a highly degraded coral island in Hainan Island, China. The example shown in the paper is designed to demonstrate the capabilities of the software platform. We have tested our software platform in different operating systems (e.g., Windows, Linux, and macOS) and various browsers (e.g., IE, Firefox, Google Chrome), all the test samples ran normally and the results were the same which proved that our software platform was stable across different systems. The RPSS platform is an evolving program with many directions for future development (e.g., add new features, output multiple types of figures). We believe that our software platform will have broad applications in the future, especially for selecting many appropriate plant species to restore degraded ecosystems.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
CW conceived the ideas and designed the software platform, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. NL collected the data. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and have final approval for publication.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41905094), a start-up fund from Hainan University, China [Grant No. KYQD (ZR) 1876], NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund, China (Grant No. U1701246), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.570454/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
2.^https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FactoMineR/index.html
3.^http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FD
4.^https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/index.html
References
1
BochetE.García-FayosP. (2015). Identifying plant traits: A key aspect for species selection in restoration of eroded roadsides in semiarid environments.Ecol. Eng.83444–451. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.019
2
BrownR. W.AmacherM. C. (1999). “Selecting plant species for ecological restoration: a perspective for land managers,” in Revegetation with native species: Proceedings, 1997 Society for Ecological Restoration annual meeting; 1997 November 12- 15; Ft Lauderdale, FL. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Proceedings RMRS-P-8, edsHolzworthL. K.BrownR., and compilers (Washington, D.C: USDA), 1–16.
3
CardinaleB. J.DuffyJ. E.GonzalezA.HooperD. U.PerringsC.VenailP.et al (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.Nature48659–67. 10.1038/nature11148
4
ChapinF. S.ZavaletaE. S.EvinerV. T.NaylorR. L.VitousekP. M.ReynoldsH. L.et al (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity.Nature405234–242.
5
FryE. L.PowerS. A.ManningP. (2013). Trait-based classification and manipulation of plant functional groups for biodiversity–ecosystem function experiments.J. Veg. Sci.25248–261. 10.1111/jvs.12068
6
GuimarãesZ. T. M.dos SantosV. A. H. F.NogueiraW. L. P.MartinsN. O. de A.FerreiraM. J. (2018). Leaf traits explaining the growth of tree species planted in a Central Amazonian disturbed area.For. Ecol. Manage.430618–628. 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.048
7
LalibertéE.LegendreP. (2010). A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits.Ecology91299–305.
8
LalibertéE.ShipleyB. (2010). FD: Measuring Functional Diversity From Multiple Traits, and Other Tools for Functional Ecology.Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
9
LaughlinD. C. (2014). Applying trait-based models to achieve functional targets for theory-driven ecological restoration.Ecol. Lett.17771–784. 10.1111/ele.12288
10
LaughlinD. C.LaughlinD. E. (2013). Advances in modelling trait-based plant community assembly.Trends Plant Sci.18584–593. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.04.012
11
LegendreL. P. (2010). A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits.Ecology91299–305. 10.1890/08-2244.1
12
LiJ.LiuN.RenH.ShenW. J.JianS. G. (2016). Ecological adaptability of seven plant species to tropical coral island habitat.Ecol. Environ. Sci.25790–794.
13
LuoQ.LiuH.WuG. L.HeP. C.HuaL.ZhuL. W.et al (2018). Using functional traits to evaluate the adaptability of five plant species on tropical coral islands.Acta Ecol. Sin.381256–1263.
14
OstertagR.WarmanL.CordellS.VitousekP. M. (2015). Using plant functional traits to restore Hawaiian rainforest.J. Appl. Ecol.52805–809. 10.1111/1365-2664.12413
15
PadillaF. M.OrtegaR.SánchezJ.PugnaireF. I. (2009). Rethinking species selection for restoration of arid shrublands.Basic Appl. Ecol.10640–647. 10.1016/j.baae.2009.03.003
16
RayomeD.DimannoN.OstertagR.CordellS.FungB.VizzoneA.et al (2019). Restoring Ecosystem Services Tool (Rest): A Program For Selecting Species For Restoration Projects Using A Functional-Trait Approach.Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-262. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 47.
17
RosenthalG. (2003). Selecting target species to evaluate the success of wet grassland restoration.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.98227–246. 10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00083-5
18
ShipleyB.VileD.GarnierÉ (2006). From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity.Science314812–814. 10.1126/science.1131344
19
WangC.ZhangH.LiuH.JianS.YanJ.LiuN. (2020). Application of a trait-based species screening framework for vegetation restoration in a tropical coral island of China.Funct. Ecol.61193–1204. 10.1111/1365-2435.13553
20
WerdenL. K.AlvaradoJ. P.ZargesS.CalderónM. E.SchillingE M.GutiérrezL. M.et al (2018). Using soil amendments and plant functional traits to select native tropical dry forest species for the restoration of degraded vertisols.J. Appl. Ecol.551019–1028. 10.1111/1365-2664.12998
21
WolfeB. T.DentD. H.DeagoJ.WishnieM. H. (2015). Forest regeneration under Tectona grandis and Terminalia Amazonia plantation stands managed for biodiversity conservation in western panama.New Forests46157–165. 10.1007/s11056-014-9448-2
22
ZhangH.ChenH.LianJ. Y.RobertJ.LiR. H.LiuH.et al (2018). Using functional trait diversity patterns to disentangle the scale-dependent ecological processes in a subtropical forest.Funct. Ecol.321379–1389. 10.1111/1365-2435.13079
23
ZhangW.ZhangH.JianS.LiuN. (2019). Tree plantations influence the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in the soils of a coral island.Appl. Soil Ecol.138220–222. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.014
Summary
Keywords
vegetation restoration, plant functional traits, maximum entropy model, restoration plant species selection platform, R language
Citation
Wang C, Jian S, Ren H, Yan J and Liu N (2021) A Web-Based Software Platform for Restoration-Oriented Species Selection Based on Plant Functional Traits. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9:570454. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.570454
Received
08 June 2020
Accepted
15 February 2021
Published
08 March 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Wenxing Long, Hainan University, China
Reviewed by
Tao Su, Nanjing Forestry University, China; Yuzhe Nie, Northeast Forestry University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Wang, Jian, Ren, Yan and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nan Liu, liunan@scbg.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Conservation and Restoration Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.