ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1561078
Foraging strategy and tree structure as drivers of arboreality and suspensory behaviour in savannah chimpanzees
Provisionally accepted- 1Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
- 2Greater Mahale Ecosystem Research and Conservation, Mpanda, Tanzania
- 3University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The association between an open habitat (e.g., savannah-mosaics) and increased terrestriality is central to hypotheses of hominin evolution, especially the emergence and evolution of bipedalism, as well as great ape evolution as far back as the early Miocene. However, the selective pressures that act on apes in an open habitat remain poorly understood. Observations of chimpanzees that live in savannahmosaics, analogous to some reconstructed hominoid palaeohabitats, can provide valuable insight into the behavioural adaptations of a large-bodied, semi-arboreal ape to an open habitat, characterised by sparsely distributed food sources and a broken canopy. We previously showed that savannah-dwelling chimpanzees in the Issa Valley, western Tanzania, maintain a high level of arboreality, and particularly suspensory behaviour, largely associated with foraging. Here, we investigate how chimpanzee foraging strategy in a savannah-mosaic may drive a high frequency of arboreal behaviours despite reduced arboreal pathways. Specifically, we hypothesized that Issa chimpanzees would spend more time foraging (and moving) per tree to maximize utilization of food in a sparse landscape. This foraging strategy would be facilitated by foraging in trees with large crowns and abundant terminal-branch foods, which are characteristic of miombo woodlands. However, the link between foraging positional behaviour and tree structure remains understudied. We collected data on arboreal foraging behaviour and corresponding tree structural characteristics over five months in the dry season, and used generalized linear mixed models to test for any effect of food type and tree structural characteristics on (1) duration of foraging bouts, (2) frequency of locomotion, and (3) use of suspensory behaviour. We found that food types and tree structures found in woodland vegetation are associated with more time spent in foraging trees, a higher rate of locomotion, and the use of suspension in particular. Our results suggest that arboreal, and especially suspensory, locomotion can be advantageous for foraging in a savannah-mosaic and not just closed forest habitats. These findings have implications for reconstructing hominoid positional behaviour from the fossil record and provide a model for how arboreality, and specifically suspensory behaviour, could have been an important part of the hominoid niche in savannah-mosaic habitats.
Keywords: human evolution, Positional behaviour, Diet, Savannah-mosaic, Pan troglodytes
Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Drummond-Clarke, Reuben, Stewart, Piel and Kivell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rhianna Charlotte Drummond-Clarke, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.