ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1613904
Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator-prey system Ecological Monographs
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
- 2New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States
- 3Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
- 4U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Regional Headquarters,, Albuquerque, United States
- 5USGS, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Predation establishes risk, which can indirectly influence prey behavior and ecology. We evaluated the influence of Mexican gray wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) on habitat selection and spatiotemporal predator avoidance strategies of elk (Cervus canadensis). We fit 866 adult female elk with GPS collars across areas of varying wolf densities within the Mexican wolf experimental population area of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico between 2019−2021. Using step-selection functions we examined relative intensity of elk use in relation to landscape attributes, estimated predator/prey diel activity, and measures of risk. Risk metrics included predicted wolf presence, habitat openness, and predicted risky places modeled from attributes of locations where wolves killed elk. Wolf activity varied across seasons and increased midday and night in fall and monsoon seasons. Relative use by elk was best explained by incorporating an interaction between diel period and predicted risky places across all seasons. Elk utilized risky places more in times of nutritional deficit associated with high energetic demands of motherhood and when forage quality was best, during spring and monsoon season. Particularly, use of risky places increased at less risky times in areas with more established wolf presence, suggesting use of risky places varied relative to exposure to Mexican wolves. These behaviors highlight the importance of temporal avoidance when predators and prey are highly mobile and largely overlap in space. Our research suggests temporally responding to predictable and relatively static environmental characteristics associated with encounter and kill rates may better balance energetic trade-offs than anticipating changes in wolf activity or spatially avoiding areas with higher wolf presence. Thus, elk appear to be more willing to take chances and mitigate cursorial predation risk with a more immediate, reactive approach and make proactive trade-offs during the seasons they can best increase fitness.
Keywords: antipredator behavior, elk, Landscape of fear, predation risk, predator-prey interactions, predator restoration, Spatiotemporal risk, Cervus canadensis
Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Thompson, Tatman, Farley, Boyle, Greenleaf and Cain. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: James Cain, USGS, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.