Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.

Sec. Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1624744

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Paradox of GeneralismView all 3 articles

Comparative morphological analysis of yellow-legged hornet (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) and European hornet (Vespa crabro) based on modern imaging techniques

Provisionally accepted
Tamás  SiposTamás Sipos1*Balázs  KolicsBalázs Kolics2Éva  Kolics-HorváthÉva Kolics-Horváth2Tamás  DonkóTamás Donkó3Ádám  CsókaÁdám Csóka3Kristóf  Kozma-BognárKristóf Kozma-Bognár4András  KovácsAndrás Kovács5Katalin  Somfalvi-TóthKatalin Somfalvi-Tóth1Sándor  KeszthelyiSándor Keszthelyi1
  • 1Department of Agronomy, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • 2Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Festetics Bioinnovation Group, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • 3Medicopus Nonprofit Ltd., Kaposvár, Hungary
  • 4Festetics Doctoral School, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • 5Department of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The yellow-legged hornet (Vespa velutina nigrithorax Lepeletier, 1836) and the European hornet (Vespa crabro L., 1758) are two social generalist predator wasps that have successfully expanded beyond their native ranges, raising ecological concerns in newly colonized regions. This study presents a comparative analysis of the two species based on morphometric morphological parameters derived from digital microscopy and micro-CT imaging. Species were collected from the natural habitats in Hungary and examined in order to assess differences in body size, colouriszation, and flight-related morphology. Our results demonstrate pointed out that the colour analyses revealed significantly darker colouration in V. v. nigrithorax. Morphological measurements confirmed that V. crabro is generally larger and more robust in body size, while V. v. nigrithorax posesses relatively longer legs and a greater wing surface area proportional to body mass, traits associated with enhanced aerial manoeuvrabilitymaneuverability and hovering ability. A linear model based on fourteen 14 flightrelated coefficients revealed that V. v. nigrithorax outperformed V. crabro in most flight-related traits, eg. speed, manoeuvrabilitymaneuverability, balancing ability, hovering and carrying capacity. Correlation analyses supported these findings, showing stronger associations among wing parameters in V. v. nigrithorax and more uniform body-thorax interaction, more robust body composition structure in V. crabro. These results suggest argue that V. v. nigrithorax's better flight performance underlies its effective bee-hawking behaviour and competitive dominance in overlapping habitats which they cooccur. The study highlights how morphological adaptations contribute to predatory success and invasion potential. Our findings also confirm that in the absence of natural enemies, an adventive predator can exhibit significant ecological advantages in competitive interactions, certainly in the initial success of invasive species.

Keywords: Colourization, comparative morphology2, external morphology3, flight abilities4, general predators5

Received: 07 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sipos, Kolics, Kolics-Horváth, Donkó, Csóka, Kozma-Bognár, Kovács, Somfalvi-Tóth and Keszthelyi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tamás Sipos, Department of Agronomy, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.