ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Urban Ecology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1657106
This article is part of the Research TopicSpatial Aspects of Urban Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Volume IIView all articles
Bears avoid residential neighborhoods in response to the experimental reduction of anthropogenic attractants
Provisionally accepted- 1Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States
- 2US Geological Survey Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, United States
- 3USDA-APHIS-WS National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, United States
- 4Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Fort Collins, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Urbanization is an extreme form of land use alteration, with human development driving changes in the distribution of resources available to wildlife. Some large carnivores have learned to exploit anthropogenic food resources in urban development, resulting in human-carnivore conflict that can have detrimental impacts to people and carnivores, as exemplified by American black bears. Management agencies commonly promote the use of bear-resistant garbage containers for reducing conflicts, but little is known about the actual behavioral responses of bears to this intervention. To understand whether black bears alter their behavior in response to changes in residential waste management, we investigated patterns of bear behavior in Durango, Colorado, where anthropogenic attractants were experimentally manipulated. Using location data from collared black bears, we modeled resource selection and movement in response to areas that had received bear-resistant garbage containers compared to those that did not. Bears avoided residential areas where garbage availability had been reduced, and this avoidance response increased over subsequent years, potentially suggesting that bears were learning from the management intervention. Bear movement rates, however, were not notably affected by the garbage reduction. Our findings highlight the importance of reducing the availability of anthropogenic attractants for changing bear behavior and reducing risk of urban human-bear conflict, and that these responses can strengthen over time as bears learn from the management intervention.
Keywords: animal behavior, human-wildlife conflict and coexistence, Learning, resource selection and movement, Spatial Ecology, Urban Ecology, Ursus americanus
Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Venumière-Lefebvre, Johnson, Breck, Alldredge and Crooks. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Cassandre Charlotte Venumière-Lefebvre, Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.