Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ecol. Evol.

Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1704400

This article is part of the Research TopicIntensively Monitored Watersheds – A Tool to Help Us Understand How Ecological Processes Function and Are Effected by Stream and Watershed RestorationView all articles

Long-term forestry and climate change effects on watershed processes and salmon populations at Carnation Creek, Vancouver Island, British Columbia

Provisionally accepted
Peter  J TschaplinskiPeter J Tschaplinski1*David  Andrew ReidDavid Andrew Reid2*Robin  G PikeRobin G Pike1David  L. SpittlehouseDavid L. Spittlehouse3
  • 1British Columbia Ministry of Water Land and Resource Stewardship, Victoria, Canada
  • 2Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Ottawa, Canada
  • 3British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The Carnation Creek study is located in a 11.2 km2 watershed on southwestern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, in the territory of the Huu-ay-aht First Nations. It was initiated in 1970 as a case study of the effects of forestry practices on watershed biological and physical processes, stream channels, aquatic habitats, and fish populations. The project's pre-harvest vs. post-harvest-impact observational design was intended to run for no more than 15 years, but continual and unanticipated changes in the responses of the biogeophysical aspects of the watershed to forest harvesting motivated the unprecedented long-term intensive study that continues. Now in year 55, the knowledge gained from this site is relevant not only for informing forestry legislation, regulations, and sustainable practices, but also (1) provides guidance on regenerating stand (second pass) forestry practices in coastal watersheds; (2) allows measurement of the contributions of climate variability to observed changes and the identification of mitigation options; (3) provides science-based guidance for watershed and stream channel restoration; and (4) serves as a logged but unrestored reference watershed for restoration effectiveness evaluations. Between 1976 and 1981, 41% of the watershed was harvested. A mixture of beneficial and harmful effects on juvenile coho salmon were initially observed. Between 1976 and 2004, a warmer thermal regime initially increased growth, freshwater survival, and boosted smolt production. Thermal benefits were partly counteracted by accelerated bank erosion, channel widening, loss of in-stream wood, formation of sediment wedges, and increased streambed scour and sediment transport downstream. Over the longer term, riparian-related impacts were greatly amplified and overwhelmed by the forestry-driven landslide effects that began in 1984. Landslide impacts took more than 20 years to propagate downstream. In the absence of habitat restoration efforts, stream channel and fish habitat complexity and stability have become greatly reduced with accelerated bedload transport, deprived riparian wood input, 2 and loss of large logjams. These delayed effects have reversed short-term, logging-related thermal benefits for coho salmon, with major declines in fry-to-smolt survival and smolt production. The results show that forestry-related impacts may take decades to fully develop and may continue to increase for decades after harvest.

Keywords: Watersheds, Restoration effectiveness, Forest practices, Riparian practices, Landslides, Aquatic habitats, Climate Change, Pacific salmon

Received: 12 Sep 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tschaplinski, Reid, Pike and Spittlehouse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Peter J Tschaplinski, peter.tschaplinski@gov.bc.ca
David Andrew Reid, david.reid@dfo-mpo.gc.ca

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.