ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Language, Culture and Diversity
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1494454
"Just having experience is not enough": Development and Evaluation of a Training for Interpreters Working in Community Settings -A Mixed-Methods Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 2SEGEMI, NGO for Mental Health, Migration and Flight e.V., Hamburg, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Across community settings, such as healthcare, interpreters play an important role in facilitating communication when service users and providers do not share a common language sufficiently. Because most countries lack legal standards in the field of Community Interpreting, Community Interpreters (CIPs) are often not adequately trained for this activity, and the need for formal training is increasingly emphasised. This study aims to evaluate a generic training for CIPs in Germany. The training was developed for interpreters working in health and social care, education and authorities in Germany. It consists of 500 units and a final examination. A mixed-methods design was applied to evaluate the training. Training participants' (TPs) satisfaction, knowledge, competence, and professional self-efficacy expectations were measured by self-developed questionnaires. A pre-post multiple-choice knowledge test was developed to objectively assess the impact on knowledge. Qualitative pre-post-interviews were conducted for an in-depth evaluation of TPs' motives for participating in training, their experiences, improvements in knowledge, skills, and attitude changes. Trainers' qualifications and satisfaction were assessed using self-developed questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using a content analysis approach. In total, n = 21 TPs and n = 18 trainers were included. Quantitative analysis revealed that trainers and TPs were overall satisfied with the training. TPs showed increased subjective and objective knowledge, competence, and professional self-efficacy expectations. Qualitative findings revealed changes in TPs' knowledge about their role and ethical principles; they reported increased skills and confidence on both professional and personal levels. Due to the training, their interpreting performance changed from being relatively intuitive and 'natural' to being informed and skills-based. They recognized the complexity of interpreting, thereby acknowledging their professional status. Obtaining a certificate after completing the examination increased their feeling of professionalism. However, TPs expressed the need for further in-depth training, as the training was rather generic and broad. The study demonstrates that generic training can enhance CIPs' knowledge, skills, competence, professional and personal confidence, and perceived professionalism. It highlights the critical need for formalized training, certification, and overall qualification programs to ensure the quality of interpreting services and to shape the profession of CIPs.
Keywords: community interpreting, public service interpreting, Evaluation, training, Mixed-methods Research
Received: 10 Sep 2024; Accepted: 01 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hanft-Robert, Iannone, Breitsprecher and Mösko. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Saskia Hanft-Robert, Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.