ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Assessment, Testing and Applied Measurement
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1550328
This article is part of the Research TopicStudent Voices in Formative Assessment FeedbackView all 9 articles
Making Student Voice Heard in Dialogic Feedback: Feedback Design Matters
Provisionally accepted- 1The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China
- 2SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- 3National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Making student voice heard is crucial for productive feedback. However, this is seldom in practice in the exam-oriented context because students lack opportunities and support to give voice in feedback processes. To bridge the gap, this collaborative actionparticipatory research explored how feedback could be redesigned to invite student voice in a Singapore secondary school. We collaborated with three Social Studies teachers to transform their error-focused practice into dialogic feedback accentuating student voice. Drawing on the Lundy model of participation and self-determination theory, the teachers designed a feedback log to let was designed to document the voice of 48 secondary four (equivalent to Grade 10) learners articulate their voice and psychological needs for competence and relatedness. in feedback interaction. Analysis of feedback logs, student focus groups and teacher interviews indicated three main aspects of student voice: (i) grades (numeric feedback) as an indicator to monitor one's goal achievement and exam preparation efforts; (ii) challenges in making feedforward; and (iii) learners' feedback engagement and motivation largely shaped by teacher response. Given the context-dependent nature of tasks in Social Studies, verbal reciprocal exchange would be useful in developing students' higher-order thinking skills for feedforward. that the students were eager to articulate task goals, self-reflections and post-task emotions but hesitant to express feedback understanding and make improvement suggestions. Inferred from the findings, the feedback log could give students autonomy to express their competence and relational needs, but the verbal reciprocal exchange between students and teachers is crucial to fulfill their needs and to develop their cognitive skills for making feed-forward. Implications for productive feedback designs are discussed, and avenues for future research outlined.
Keywords: student voice, Dialogic feedback, Feedback design, exam-oriented context, School
Received: 23 Dec 2024; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 To, Aluquin and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jessica To, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.