CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND PEDAGOGY article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1604934
This article is part of the Research TopicAI's Impact on Higher Education: Transforming Research, Teaching, and LearningView all 12 articles
Implementing Generative AI in Class: An Evidence-Based Model for Responsible Adoption of Generative AI Chatbot Platforms in Higher Education
Provisionally accepted
- 1The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
- 2Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Generative AI presents opportunities and challenges for higher education stakeholders. While most campuses are encouraging the use of generative AI, frameworks for responsible integration and evidence-based implementation are still emerging. This Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy article offers a use case of UT Austin's approach to this dilemma through an innovative generative AI teaching and learning chatbot platform called UT Sage. Based on the demonstrated benefits of chatbot technologies in education, we developed UT Sage as a generative AI platform that is both student-and faculty-facing. The platform has two distinct features, one a tutorbot interface for students and the other, an instructional design agent or builder bot designed to coach faculty to create custom tutors using the science of learning. We believe UT Sage offers a first-of-its-kind generative AI tool that supports responsible use and drives active, student-centered learning and evidence-based instructional design at scale. Our findings include an overview of early lessons learned and future implications derived from the development and pilot testing of a campus-wide tutorbot platform at a major research university. We provide a comprehensive report on a single pedagogical innovation rather than an empirical study on generative AI. Our findings are limited by the constraints of autoethnographic approaches (all authors were involved in the project) and user-testing research. The practical implications of this work include two frameworks, derived from autoethnographic analysis, that we used to guide the responsible and pedagogically efficacious implementation of generative AI tutorbots in higher education.
Keywords: generative AI (GenAI), chatbot adoption, Instructional design (ID), higher education, science of learning
Received: 02 Apr 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schell, Ford and Markman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Julie Schell, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.