ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1621743
This article is part of the Research TopicResearch Ethics and Integrity in the Artificial Intelligence EraView all 7 articles
Examining Academic Integrity Policy and Practice in the Era of AI: A Case Study of Faculty Perspectives
Provisionally accepted- Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study investigates faculty perceptions of academic integrity policies addressing traditional and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) plagiarism at an internationalized higher education institution in the UAE. Employing a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were collected from 71 faculty members representing 37 nations via an online survey, supplemented by qualitative insights from 17 semi-structured interviews. The research assessed perceptions across five dimensions—availability, visibility, clarity, adequacy, and effectiveness—based on Bretag et al.'s (2011) framework. Results revealed significant disparities between traditional and GenAI policies, with both rated only moderately effective. Faculty demonstrated a preference for educative over punitive approaches while identifying workload constraints, insufficient institutional support, detection challenges, cultural leniency, and systemic limitations as barriers to policy enforcement. A hierarchical perception of GenAI plagiarism emerged, with direct content copying considered most serious and AI-assisted practices involving minimal student contribution viewed less severely. Lower response rates to Gen-AI scenarios reflected faculty uncertainty amid insufficient guidelines. The findings underscore the necessity for agile, comprehensive policies that address technological advancements while emphasizing faculty engagement and contextual support. This research contributes novel insights into underexplored scenarios including language assistance, translation, peer idea sharing, and citation errors, illuminating the evolving landscape of academic integrity in digital and collaborative environments. The study advocates for balanced frameworks integrating educative strategies, technological tools, and cultural sensitivities to maintain academic integrity standards in the AI era.
Keywords: Gen-AI Plagiarism, faculty experience, UAE, Policy and practice, higher education
Received: 01 May 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alsharefeen and AlSayari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rami Alsharefeen, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.