Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. STEM Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1628023

Discontinuities that arise when designing for educational improvement at state scale

Provisionally accepted
Michelle  StephanMichelle Stephan1*Allison  McCullochAllison McCulloch1Catherine  SchwartzCatherine Schwartz2Holt  WilsonHolt Wilson3Katherine  MawhinneyKatherine Mawhinney4
  • 1University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, United States
  • 2East Carolina State University, Greenville, NC, United States
  • 3University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro,, United States
  • 4Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This paper explores the tensions—or discontinuities—that arise when designing for educational improvement at scale through research-practice partnerships (RPPs). Focusing on a statewide mathematics education initiative, the authors examine the complexities of coordinating work across diverse communities of practice and analyze how identity, power, and meaning-making impact collaborative problem definition. Drawing on Wenger’s dualities of participation-reification and identification-negotiation, the study highlights three recurring discontinuities: navigating the ambiguity of the design process, designing for diverse system stakeholders, and negotiating shared vocabulary. Through qualitative analysis of team reflections, activities, and artifacts, the paper offers practical strategies—such as participation structures and system mapping—to support productive boundary encounters and restore continuity. These insights advance both theory and practice for those undertaking equity-oriented design at large scale.

Keywords: Design based research, discontinuities, Community of practice (cop), large scale, Research Practice Partnership

Received: 13 May 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Stephan, McCulloch, Schwartz, Wilson and Mawhinney. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Michelle Stephan, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.