Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1631174

TASK-ORIENTED READING IN HIGHER EDUCATION 1 Task-Oriented Reading in Higher Education: Effects of Two Types of Scripted Collaboration

Provisionally accepted
  • Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Task-oriented reading is an important skill in higher education. However, many students in higher education have little experience in this type of reading and lack strategies for executing it efficiently and effectively. The aim of the present study is to design and test a learning environment in realistic classroom settings to foster taskoriented reading in higher education. A learning environment was designed and tested experimentally in a series of lessons to aid teacher students of different disciplines (N = 105) in the process of task-oriented reading in two stages: homework and group discussion. Using a prepost experimental design, two types of scripted collaboration were compared: one group received role assignment only, while the other group additionally received instructions about different phases in the collaboration process. Two task-oriented reading tasks (pre-and post-test) were designed, each consisting of four texts and 11 open-ended questions about these texts. Students' activities during task execution were logged.Both groups significantly improved performance between pre-and posttest. However, results showed no significant differences between the two groups in growth between pre-and posttest. Logs of task execution showed that all students spent more time on reading relevant text parts at posttest and spent less time on question reading and answering at posttest, suggesting that students executed task-oriented reading more efficiently as a result of the learning environment.The results suggest that students exhibited greater efficiency in navigating between their task and text representation, which is in accordance with literature on the process of task-oriented reading. No significant differences were found between the two types of scripting, indicating that the phased discussion did not confer any advantage over role assignment only. This difference may be attributed to the relatively small difference between the two types of scripting.

Keywords: Task-oriented reading, reading-to-learn, Learning environment, Technology-enhanced, Reciprocal teaching

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Okkinga and Van Gelderen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mariska Okkinga, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.